ML17325B516: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 04/01/1999
| issue date = 04/01/1999
| title = LER 99-007-00:on 981020,calculations Showed That Divider Barrier Between Upper & Lower Containment Vols Were Overstressed.Engineers Are Currently Working on Analyses of Loads & Stress on Enclosures
| title = LER 99-007-00:on 981020,calculations Showed That Divider Barrier Between Upper & Lower Containment Vols Were Overstressed.Engineers Are Currently Working on Analyses of Loads & Stress on Enclosures
| author name = KOSLOFF D C
| author name = Kosloff D
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO.
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO.
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC Form 366 U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (6-1998)LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)(See reverse for required number of digits/characters for each block)APPROVED BY OMB NO.3160%104 EXPIRES 06/30)2001 ESTIMATED BORDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS MANDATORY INFORMATION COILECAON REOVEST'.50 0 HRS.REPORTED lESSONS lEARNED ARE INCORPORATED NTO THE LICENSING PROCESS AND FED SACK TO INDVSTRY, FORWARD COMMENTS REGARIXNG SVRDEN ESTNATE TO THE INFORMATION ANO RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (T4 F55).V.S.NVCLEAR REGVLATORY COMMISSlON.
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC Form 366             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                   APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3160%104                 EXPIRES 06/30)2001 (6-1998)
WASHINGTON, DC 20555400), ANO TO THE PAPERWORK REDVCTION PROJECT (51504)05), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT ANO SICGET.WASHINGTON.
ESTIMATED BORDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS MANDATORY INFORMATION COILECAON REOVEST'. 50 0 HRS. REPORTED lESSONS lEARNED ARE INCORPORATED NTO THE LICENSING PROCESS AND FED SACK TO INDVSTRY, LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)                                              FORWARD COMMENTS REGARIXNG SVRDEN ESTNATE TO THE INFORMATION ANO RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (T4 F55). V.S. NVCLEAR REGVLATORY COMMISSlON. WASHINGTON, DC 20555400), ANO TO THE PAPERWORK REDVCTION PROJECT (51504)05), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT ANO SICGET. WASHINGTON. OC (See reverse for required number of                                  20505 digits/characters for each block)
OC 20505 FACIUTY NAME (1)Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 DOCKETNUMBER(2) 05000-315 PAGE (2)1 of 1 TITLE (4)Calculations Show that the Divider Barrier Between Upper and Lower Containment Volumes May Be Overstressed EVENT DATE (5)LER NUMBER (6)REPORT DATE (7)OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)MONTH 10 DAY YEAR 20 1998 YEAR 1999 SEQUENTIAL NUMBER 007 REVISION NUMBER 00 MONTH DAY 04 01 YEAR 1999 A I I NAM Cook Unit 2 ILI NAM D NUMB R 05000-316 D NUM OPERATING MODE (9)re)(11)20.2201 (b)50.73(a)(2)(viii) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(i)
FACIUTY NAME (1)                                                                                   DOCKETNUMBER(2)                            PAGE (2)
THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR li: (Check one or mo POWER LEVEL (10)00 20.2203(a)(1) 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 20.2203(a)(3)(i) 20.2203(a)(3)(ii) 20.2203(a)(4) 50.36(c)(1) 50.36(c)(2)
Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1                                             05000-315                                 1 of 1 TITLE (4)
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(iv) 50.73(a)(2)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(vii) 50.73(a)(2)(x) 73.71 OTHER Speofy SI Abetraor be)rwr or n NRC Form 366A Mr: Donald C.Kosloff, Compliance Engineer TELEPHONE NUMBER (Indude Area Code)616/465-5901, X2129 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE To EPIX CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO EPIX SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)X YES (If Yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE)NO EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE (15)MONTH 08 DAY 20 1999 Abstract (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines)(16)While working on a preliminary calculation for the Unit 1 steam generator replacement project, it was concluded that some of the structural load cases indicated overstressed conditions in the steam generator enclosures.
Calculations Show that the Divider Barrier Between Upper and Lower Containment Volumes May Be Overstressed EVENT DATE (5)                     LER NUMBER (6)                       REPORT DATE (7)                         OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)
Based on these preliminaiy analyses, on October 20, 1998, with both units in Mode 5, engineering personnel determined that a postulated steam line break could result in calculated stresses exceeding the code allowable stresses for the Unit 1 steam generator enclosures.
A  I I  NAM                        D        NUMB R SEQUENTIAL        REVISION                                          Cook Unit 2                          05000-316 MONTH DAY             YEAR     YEAR         NUMBER           NUMBER     MONTH         DAY       YEAR ILI NAM                       D         NUM 10        20      1998    1999            007            00        04          01        1999 OPERATING                   THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR li: (Check one or mo re) (11)
These reinforced concrete enclosures are part of the divider barrier between the upper and lower containment volumes.Overstressed conditions in these enclosures could allow increased steam bypass flow around the ice condensers which could result in higher than expected containment pressure.When the potential overstress conditions were identified, it was concluded that the conditions could be due to significant conservatisms in the preliminary calculation and in its interpretation.
MODE (9)                      20.2201 (b)                         20.2203(a)(2)(v)                         50.73(a)(2)(i)                   50.73(a)(2)(viii)
Engineering continued their evaluation of this issue.However, as evaluations continued, a lack of information confirming an acceptable condition led to the conclusion that there was no longer a reasonable expectation that the structures would not be overstressed.
POWER                         20.2203(a)(1)                       20.2203(a)(3)(i)                         50.73(a)(2)(ii)                 50.73(a)(2)(x)
On March 2, 1999, with both units still in Mode 5, the apparent overstress conditions were determined to be reportable under 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(i) and 50.73(a)(2)(ii).
LEVEL (10)         00 20.2203(a)(2)(i)                   20.2203(a)(3)(ii)                       50.73(a)(2)(iii)                 73.71 20.2203(a)(2)(ii)                   20.2203(a)(4)                           50.73(a)(2)(iv)                   OTHER 20.2203(a)(2)(iii)                 50.36(c)(1)                             50.73(a)(2)(v)
Based on this determination, an ENS notification was made on March 2, 1999, at 1314 hours in accordance with 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(i).
Speofy SI Abetraor be)rwr 20.2203(a)(2)(iv)                   50.36(c)(2)                             50.73(a)(2)(vii)             or n NRC Form 366A LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
Structural engineers are currently developing appropriate analyses of the loads and stresses on the enclosures.
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Indude Area Code)
The results of these analyses will determine if an overstressed condition could have occurred and, if so, the safety significance of the overstressed condition.
Mr: Donald C. Kosloff, Compliance Engineer                                                     616/465-5901, X2129 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)
Appropriate corrective action will be developed based on an evaluation of the analytical results.9904070426 990401 PDR ADQCK 05000315 S , PDR}}
REPORTABLE                                                                                  REPORTABLE TO CAUSE       SYSTEM     COMPONENT     MANUFACTURER         To EPIX             CAUSE       SYSTEM       COMPONENT           MANUFACTURER                 EPIX SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)                                         EXPECTED                        MONTH          DAY X     YES                                                                                   SUBMISSION                        08            20            1999 (If Yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE)                         NO                   DATE (15)
Abstract (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)
While working on a preliminary calculation for the Unit 1 steam generator replacement project, it was concluded that some of the structural load cases indicated overstressed conditions in the steam generator enclosures. Based on these preliminaiy analyses, on October 20, 1998, with both units in Mode 5, engineering personnel determined that a postulated steam line break could result in calculated stresses exceeding the code allowable stresses for the Unit 1 steam generator enclosures. These reinforced concrete enclosures are part of the divider barrier between the upper and lower containment volumes. Overstressed conditions in these enclosures could allow increased steam bypass flow around the ice condensers which could result in higher than expected containment pressure.
When the potential overstress conditions were identified, it was concluded that the conditions could be due to significant conservatisms in the preliminary calculation and in its interpretation. Engineering continued their evaluation of this issue.
However, as evaluations continued, a lack of information confirming an acceptable condition led to the conclusion that there was no longer a reasonable expectation that the structures would not be overstressed. On March 2, 1999, with both units still in Mode 5, the apparent overstress conditions were determined to be reportable under 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(i) and 50.73(a)(2)(ii). Based on this determination, an ENS notification was made on March 2, 1999, at 1314 hours in accordance with 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(i).
Structural engineers are currently developing appropriate analyses of the loads and stresses on the enclosures. The results of these analyses will determine if an overstressed condition could have occurred and, if so, the safety significance of the overstressed condition. Appropriate corrective action will be developed based on an evaluation of the analytical results.
9904070426 990401 PDR         ADQCK 05000315 S         ,                   PDR}}

Latest revision as of 05:37, 29 October 2019

LER 99-007-00:on 981020,calculations Showed That Divider Barrier Between Upper & Lower Containment Vols Were Overstressed.Engineers Are Currently Working on Analyses of Loads & Stress on Enclosures
ML17325B516
Person / Time
Site: Cook American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 04/01/1999
From: Kosloff D
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17325B513 List:
References
LER-99-007, LER-99-7, NUDOCS 9904070426
Download: ML17325B516 (1)


Text

NRC Form 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3160%104 EXPIRES 06/30)2001 (6-1998)

ESTIMATED BORDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS MANDATORY INFORMATION COILECAON REOVEST'. 50 0 HRS. REPORTED lESSONS lEARNED ARE INCORPORATED NTO THE LICENSING PROCESS AND FED SACK TO INDVSTRY, LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) FORWARD COMMENTS REGARIXNG SVRDEN ESTNATE TO THE INFORMATION ANO RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (T4 F55). V.S. NVCLEAR REGVLATORY COMMISSlON. WASHINGTON, DC 20555400), ANO TO THE PAPERWORK REDVCTION PROJECT (51504)05), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT ANO SICGET. WASHINGTON. OC (See reverse for required number of 20505 digits/characters for each block)

FACIUTY NAME (1) DOCKETNUMBER(2) PAGE (2)

Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 05000-315 1 of 1 TITLE (4)

Calculations Show that the Divider Barrier Between Upper and Lower Containment Volumes May Be Overstressed EVENT DATE (5) LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)

A I I NAM D NUMB R SEQUENTIAL REVISION Cook Unit 2 05000-316 MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR NUMBER NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR ILI NAM D NUM 10 20 1998 1999 007 00 04 01 1999 OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR li: (Check one or mo re) (11)

MODE (9) 20.2201 (b) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)

POWER 20.2203(a)(1) 20.2203(a)(3)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(x)

LEVEL (10) 00 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 20.2203(a)(3)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 73.71 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a)(4) 50.73(a)(2)(iv) OTHER 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 50.36(c)(1) 50.73(a)(2)(v)

Speofy SI Abetraor be)rwr 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(vii) or n NRC Form 366A LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)

TELEPHONE NUMBER (Indude Area Code)

Mr: Donald C. Kosloff, Compliance Engineer 616/465-5901, X2129 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)

REPORTABLE REPORTABLE TO CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER To EPIX CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER EPIX SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14) EXPECTED MONTH DAY X YES SUBMISSION 08 20 1999 (If Yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE) NO DATE (15)

Abstract (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)

While working on a preliminary calculation for the Unit 1 steam generator replacement project, it was concluded that some of the structural load cases indicated overstressed conditions in the steam generator enclosures. Based on these preliminaiy analyses, on October 20, 1998, with both units in Mode 5, engineering personnel determined that a postulated steam line break could result in calculated stresses exceeding the code allowable stresses for the Unit 1 steam generator enclosures. These reinforced concrete enclosures are part of the divider barrier between the upper and lower containment volumes. Overstressed conditions in these enclosures could allow increased steam bypass flow around the ice condensers which could result in higher than expected containment pressure.

When the potential overstress conditions were identified, it was concluded that the conditions could be due to significant conservatisms in the preliminary calculation and in its interpretation. Engineering continued their evaluation of this issue.

However, as evaluations continued, a lack of information confirming an acceptable condition led to the conclusion that there was no longer a reasonable expectation that the structures would not be overstressed. On March 2, 1999, with both units still in Mode 5, the apparent overstress conditions were determined to be reportable under 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(i) and 50.73(a)(2)(ii). Based on this determination, an ENS notification was made on March 2, 1999, at 1314 hours0.0152 days <br />0.365 hours <br />0.00217 weeks <br />4.99977e-4 months <br /> in accordance with 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(i).

Structural engineers are currently developing appropriate analyses of the loads and stresses on the enclosures. The results of these analyses will determine if an overstressed condition could have occurred and, if so, the safety significance of the overstressed condition. Appropriate corrective action will be developed based on an evaluation of the analytical results.

9904070426 990401 PDR ADQCK 05000315 S , PDR