ML17011A165: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17011A165
| number = ML17011A165
| issue date = 01/11/2017
| issue date = 01/11/2017
| title = 2017/01/11 NRR E-mail Capture - Catawba, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment for TSTF-361-A, Rev. 2  Allow Standby SDC-RHR-DHR Loop to Be Inoperable to Support Testing (CACs MF8973 & MF8974)
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - Catawba, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment for TSTF-361-A, Rev. 2  Allow Standby SDC-RHR-DHR Loop to Be Inoperable to Support Testing (CACs MF8973 & MF8974)
| author name = Mahoney M
| author name = Mahoney M
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| addressee name = Fletcher C A
| addressee name = Fletcher C
| addressee affiliation = Duke Energy Corp
| addressee affiliation = Duke Energy Corp
| docket = 05000413, 05000414
| docket = 05000413, 05000414
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
| project =  
| project = CAC:MF8973
| stage = Acceptance Review
| stage = Acceptance Review
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Mahoney, MichaelSent:Wednesday, January 11, 2017 10:02 AMTo:Fletcher II, Cecil AlexanderCc:'Wilson, Carrie'
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                               Mahoney, Michael Sent:                               Wednesday, January 11, 2017 10:02 AM To:                                 Fletcher II, Cecil Alexander Cc:                                 'Wilson, Carrie'


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Catawba, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re: Amendment for TSTF-361-A, Rev. 2 , "Allow Standby SDC-RHR-DHR Loop to be Inoperable to Support Testing" (CACs MF8973 & MF8974)Cecil,   By letter dated December 15, 2016, Duke Energy submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Catawba Nuclear Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The LAR adopts TSTF-361-A, Rev. 2 , "Allow Standby SDC-RHR-DHR Loop to be Inoperable to Support Testing" (CACs MF8973 & MF8974).
Catawba, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re:
Amendment for TSTF-361-A, Rev. 2 , "Allow Standby SDC-RHR-DHR Loop to be Inoperable to Support Testing" (CACs MF8973 & MF8974)
: Cecil, By letter dated December 15, 2016, Duke Energy submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Catawba Nuclear Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The LAR adopts TSTF-361-A, Rev. 2 , Allow Standby SDC-RHR-DHR Loop to be Inoperable to Support Testing (CACs MF8973 & MF8974).
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::295 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is December, 2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Thanks Mike Michael Mahoney McGuire and Catawba Project Manager, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Desk: (301)-415-3867 1


The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Email: Michael.Mahoney@NRC.GOV 2
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
 
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::295 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is December, 2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.


If you have any questions, please contact me. Thanks Mike  Michael Mahoney McGuire and Catawba Project Manager, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing  Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Desk: (301)-415-3867 2Email: Michael.Mahoney@NRC.GOV Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3260   Mail Envelope Properties   (58e1d1f0ac3d4e4eab70c97b38f2dded)  
Hearing Identifier:       NRR_PMDA Email Number:             3260 Mail Envelope Properties       (58e1d1f0ac3d4e4eab70c97b38f2dded)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Catawba, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re: Amendment for TSTF-361-A, Rev. 2 , "Allow Standby SDC-RHR-DHR Loop to be Inoperable to Support Testing" (CACs MF8973 & MF8974)
Catawba, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re:
Sent Date:   1/11/2017 10:01:42 AM Received Date: 1/11/2017 10:01:46 AM From:   Mahoney, Michael Created By:   Michael.Mahoney@nrc.gov Recipients:     "'Wilson, Carrie'" <Carrie.Wilson@duke-energy.com> Tracking Status: None "Fletcher II, Cecil Alexander" <Cecil.Fletcher@duke-energy.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office:   R4PWMSMRS03.nrc.gov   Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   2766     1/11/2017 10:01:46 AM   Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Amendment for TSTF-361-A, Rev. 2 , "Allow Standby SDC-RHR-DHR Loop to be Inoperable to Support Testing" (CACs MF8973 & MF8974)
Sent Date:               1/11/2017 10:01:42 AM Received Date:           1/11/2017 10:01:46 AM From:                     Mahoney, Michael Created By:               Michael.Mahoney@nrc.gov Recipients:
"'Wilson, Carrie'" <Carrie.Wilson@duke-energy.com>
Tracking Status: None "Fletcher II, Cecil Alexander" <Cecil.Fletcher@duke-energy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:             R4PWMSMRS03.nrc.gov Files                             Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                           2766                   1/11/2017 10:01:46 AM Options Priority:                         Standard Return Notification:             No Reply Requested:                 No Sensitivity:                     Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 02:08, 9 March 2020

NRR E-mail Capture - Catawba, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment for TSTF-361-A, Rev. 2 Allow Standby SDC-RHR-DHR Loop to Be Inoperable to Support Testing (CACs MF8973 & MF8974)
ML17011A165
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/11/2017
From: Michael Mahoney
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Fletcher C
Duke Energy Corp
References
MF8973, MF8974
Download: ML17011A165 (3)
v • d • e


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Mahoney, Michael Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 10:02 AM To: Fletcher II, Cecil Alexander Cc: 'Wilson, Carrie'

Subject:

Catawba, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re:

Amendment for TSTF-361-A, Rev. 2 , "Allow Standby SDC-RHR-DHR Loop to be Inoperable to Support Testing" (CACs MF8973 & MF8974)

Cecil, By letter dated December 15, 2016, Duke Energy submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Catawba Nuclear Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The LAR adopts TSTF-361-A, Rev. 2 , Allow Standby SDC-RHR-DHR Loop to be Inoperable to Support Testing (CACs MF8973 & MF8974).

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 295 hours12.292 days <br />1.756 weeks <br />0.404 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is December, 2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Thanks Mike Michael Mahoney McGuire and Catawba Project Manager, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Desk: (301)-415-3867 1

Email: Michael.Mahoney@NRC.GOV 2

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3260 Mail Envelope Properties (58e1d1f0ac3d4e4eab70c97b38f2dded)

Subject:

Catawba, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re:

Amendment for TSTF-361-A, Rev. 2 , "Allow Standby SDC-RHR-DHR Loop to be Inoperable to Support Testing" (CACs MF8973 & MF8974)

Sent Date: 1/11/2017 10:01:42 AM Received Date: 1/11/2017 10:01:46 AM From: Mahoney, Michael Created By: Michael.Mahoney@nrc.gov Recipients:

"'Wilson, Carrie'" <Carrie.Wilson@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None "Fletcher II, Cecil Alexander" <Cecil.Fletcher@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: R4PWMSMRS03.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2766 1/11/2017 10:01:46 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17011A165&oldid=2539517"