ML15128A250: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/22/2014
| issue date = 08/22/2014
| title = 2014 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-403-1
| title = 2014 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-403-1
| author name = Bielby M E
| author name = Bielby M
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Item Description 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*) c. NRC Chief Examiner(*) d. NRC Supervisor(*) Form ES-403-1 SRO Initials a b c Date (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. ES-403, Page 6 of 6 ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facility: !?Al i; A.1b<:> Date of Exam: 8/;:;/; Exam Level: RO Item Description 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a plicants Printed Name/Signature a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*) C. d. NRC Supervisor(*) Initials Date a//B/IY g/;!)4 9/!(c,j/4-9#f;/J'I (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403                             Written Examination Grading                       Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist SRO Initials Item Description                                   a      b      c
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
: 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
: 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature                             Date
: a. Grader
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)
: c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
: d. NRC Supervisor(*)
(*)   The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6
 
ES-403                                 Written Examination Grading                     Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: !?Al   i; ,fs/;1J~ A.1b<:>   Date of Exam: 8/;:;/;       Exam Level: RO Initials Item Description
: 1.       Clean answer sheets copied before grading
: 2.       Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
: 3.      Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
: 4.      Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable , +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
: 5.      All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
: 6.      Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a plicants Printed Name/Signature                           Date
: a. Grader                                                                               a//B/IY
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)                                                                 g/;!)4
                                                                                          ~fib/it./
C.                                                                                      9/!(c,j/4-
: d. NRC Supervisor(*)                                                                  9#f;/J'I
(*)     The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}

Latest revision as of 12:40, 31 October 2019

2014 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-403-1
ML15128A250
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/22/2014
From: Bielby M
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Northern States Power Co
Shared Package
ML13093A444 List:
References
Download: ML15128A250 (2)
v • d • e


Text

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist SRO Initials Item Description a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
d. NRC Supervisor(*)

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: !?Al i; ,fs/;1J~ A.1b<:> Date of Exam: 8/;:;/; Exam Level: RO Initials Item Description

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable , +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a plicants Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader a//B/IY
b. Facility Reviewer(*) g/;!)4

~fib/it./

C. 9/!(c,j/4-

d. NRC Supervisor(*) 9#f;/J'I

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15128A250&oldid=2033737"