ML22242A303

2.3-1 Exam Outline Quality Checklist

ML22242A303
Person / Time
Site:	Prairie Island
Issue date:	03/24/2022
From:	Jim Nance NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	Nuclear Management Co
Nance J
Shared Package
ML21188A221	List: ML22242A303 ML22242A307
References
Download: ML22242A303 (1)

Text

Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Facility: PRAIRIE ISLAND Date of Examination: August 2022 (Y)es / (N)o Item Task Description a b* c#

a. The outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with the ztu instructions in Section B of ES-4.1, and all knowledge and ability (l(A) categories are fc JN F appropriately sampled.

F t b. The outline does not overemphasize any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. fc G,, JN

= c. Justifications for deselected or rejected t</A statements are acceptable. fc 6, JN

a. Using Form 3.4-1, Events and Evolutions Checklist, veriff that the proposed scenario set contains the required numbei of normal evolutions, reactivity evolutions, instrument #8 and component failures, manual control evolutions, technical specifications, and major fc A,)

transients.

t b.

o F

There are enough scenarios (and spares) for the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule fc tp #7

) without compromising exam integrity. Ensure that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

=

a c.

thJ #3 Ensure that all scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4 fc and that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s).

d. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and fc JN quantitative simulator set criteria specified on Form 2.3-2. ),,

a. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified in the instructions on fc #3 Form 3.2-1 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit tes(s). abJ

b. Verify that the control room and in-plant systems outline meets the criteria specified in a #3 0-

-?

the instructions on Form 3.2-2 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s).

fc N

c. Determine whether the number of job performance measures (JPMs) and JPM types is sufficient for the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are fc bJ JN duplicated on subsequent days.

a. Assess whether the appropriate exam sections cover plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights).

fc b\) #2

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 10 CFR 55.43, and 10 CFR 55.45 sampling is fc JN J appropriate. hJ E. c. Check whether l(A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are greater fc JN ztUtU than or equal to 2.5. tfl,r o d. Check for duplication and overlap across the exam and with the last two NRC exams. fc rDv #6

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. fc bt"t JN f . Assess wi'rether the exam fits the appropriate job level (reactor operator or senior fc JN reactor operator). hrJ Printed Na

a. Author Fredrick Collins I '

ZL

b. Facility Reviewer (*) Bryan Wooster / 2L

c. NRC Reviewer (#) James C. Nance Digitally signed by James C. Nance Date: 2022.03.24 11:50:07 -04'00' See attached outline comments NRC Chief Examiner Charles D. Zoia Digitally signed by Charles D. Zoia Date: 2022.03.24 11:22:07 -05'00' See attached outline comments NRC Supervisor Patricia J. Pelke Digitally signed by Patricia J. Pelke Date: 2022.03.24 11:33:47 -05'00' See attached outline comments

" The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRc-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC revie\,ver performs the steps in column "c." This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the outline under review.

ES-2.3, Page 9 of 19