ML20265A180

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
ES-403-1
ML20265A180
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/21/2020
From:
Nuclear Management Co
To:
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Callaway G
Shared Package
ML19127A300 List:
References
Download: ML20265A180 (2)


Text

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: gA Date of Exam: ,J Exam Level: RO igT SRO

'j7 il It:. I SLA/\JO , / ?P?o

'8 LI Item Description Initials a b C

{)J--

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading R
2. Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required N/

(N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted) JJ/ '< K_ N/R

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors 4.

(reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 9J-80%, as applicable, :E4o/o-eft-t./=ie-&R8=-ofll) reviewed in detail ' I

.0 1<. I u ( N/R

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified rJ/( 1v I rz. N/R
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants R: 9:t Date Printed Name/Signature cgJ#
a. Grader Ff!fef2tc.t: <bLLrrn / s/Ji/(zoio
b. Facility Reviewer(*) -"" "' HA<,;£ I <6/7-cJI l6z-0 8/28/2020 C. NRC Chief Examiner (*) Gary W. Callaway/
d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO igT SRO PR.Al¥-((: IS LA-rJD - /2- I /'7,Jl,V 8

Item Description Initials a b C

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading R
2. Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted) tJ/ tZ tJ )R, ,._JIR.
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors 4.

(reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or R (jj-80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in detail ' tJ/rz ,._JIR. ,._JIR.

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified tJIR N/,<._ ,._JIR.
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants 9c-Printed Name/Signature - Date

//- /

a. Grader Fl?.GDt1d( ,,.,,, I;{ / -_,/'/ bl(po?I)
b. Facility Reviewer(*) jv..-r 1/V µR-1 UJI- r;)V-!h,oio C. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

Gary W. Callaway/ /'f!J 8/28/2020

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6