ML20265A180

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
ES-403-1
ML20265A180
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/21/2020
From:
Nuclear Management Co
To:
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Callaway G
Shared Package
ML19127A300 List:
References
Download: ML20265A180 (2)


Text

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Facility: 'j7gAil It:. I SLA/\\JO Date of Exam:,J, /

'8 LI ?P?o Exam Level:

Item Description 1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2.

Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted) 3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) 4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, :E4o/o-eft-t./=ie-&R8=-ofllc) reviewed in detail 5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified 6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature d

a.

Grader Ff!fef2tc.t: <bLLrrn /

b.

Facility Reviewer(*)

-"" "' HA<,;£ I cgJ#

C. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d.

NRC Supervisor (*)

Form ES-403-1 a

b C

R

{)J--

JJ/ '<

N/K_

b 9J-

.0 I 1<.

u I (

rJ/(

1v I rz.

R: 9:t Date s/Ji/(zoio

<6/7-cJ I l6z-0

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6 RO igT SRO Initials N/R N/R N/R 8/28/2020 Gary W. Callaway/

SIGN

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Facility: PR.Al¥-((: IS LA-rJD Date of Exam:

8 / /

Exam Level:

2-I '7,Jl,V Item Description 1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2.

Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted) 3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) 4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in detail 5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified 6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature

//-

-/

Fl?.GDt1d(,,.,,, I;{

/ -_,/'/

a.

Grader b.

Facility Reviewer(*)

jv..-r 1/V µR-1 UJI-

/'f!J C.

NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d.

NRC Supervisor (*)

Form ES-403-1 RO igT SRO Initials a

b C

R tJ/ tZ tJ )R, R (jj-tJ/rz,._JI R.

tJIR N/,<._

9c- #

Date

bl(po?I) r; )V-!h,oio

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

,._JI R.

,._JI R.

,._JI R.

8/28/2020 Gary W. Callaway/