ML15098A645: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML15098A645
| number = ML15098A645
| issue date = 04/08/2015
| issue date = 04/08/2015
| title = Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3 - Acceptance Review Email, Alternative Request IR-3-27 (TAC No. MF5868)
| title = Acceptance Review Email, Alternative Request IR-3-27
| author name = Guzman R V
| author name = Guzman R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-1
| addressee name = Craft W D
| addressee name = Craft W
| addressee affiliation = Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc
| addressee affiliation = Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc
| docket = 05000423
| docket = 05000423
| license number = NPF-049
| license number = NPF-049
| contact person = Guzman R V
| contact person = Guzman R
| case reference number = TAC MF5868
| case reference number = TAC MF5868
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Guzman, Richard Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 5:00 PM To: wanda.d.craft@dom.com Cc: 'william.d.bartron@dom.com'; Venkataraman, Booma Subject: Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3 - Acceptance Review Email, Alternative Request IR-3-27 (TAC No. MF5868)  Wanda,  By letter dated March 9, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15075A025), Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., submitted relief request IR-3-27 for implementation of extended reactor vessel inservice inspection interval for the Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed the application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the application in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed to complete the staff's technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                     Guzman, Richard Sent:                     Wednesday, April 08, 2015 5:00 PM To:                       wanda.d.craft@dom.com Cc:                       'william.d.bartron@dom.com'; Venkataraman, Booma


==Subject:==
Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3 - Acceptance Review Email, Alternative Request IR-3-27 (TAC No. MF5868)
: Wanda, By letter dated March 9, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15075A025), Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., submitted relief request IR-3-27 for implementation of extended reactor vessel inservice inspection interval for the Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request.
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed the application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the application in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed to complete the staffs technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely, Rich Guzman Sr. Project Manager NRR/DORL US NRC 301-415-1030  
Sincerely, Rich Guzman Sr. Project Manager NRR/DORL US NRC 301-415-1030}}
}}

Latest revision as of 14:14, 31 October 2019

Acceptance Review Email, Alternative Request IR-3-27
ML15098A645
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 04/08/2015
From: Richard Guzman
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Craft W
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut
Guzman R
References
TAC MF5868
Download: ML15098A645 (1)


Text

From: Guzman, Richard Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 5:00 PM To: wanda.d.craft@dom.com Cc: 'william.d.bartron@dom.com'; Venkataraman, Booma

Subject:

Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3 - Acceptance Review Email, Alternative Request IR-3-27 (TAC No. MF5868)

Wanda, By letter dated March 9, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15075A025), Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., submitted relief request IR-3-27 for implementation of extended reactor vessel inservice inspection interval for the Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 3. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request.

The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed the application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the application in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed to complete the staffs technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Sincerely, Rich Guzman Sr. Project Manager NRR/DORL US NRC 301-415-1030