ML17186A421: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML17186A421 | |||
| issue date = 07/05/2017 | |||
| title = WAT3 - Notification of NRC Inspection of the Implementation of Mitigation Strategies and Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Orders and Emergency Preparedness Communication/Staffing/Multi-Unit Dose Assessment Plans (05000382/2017009) and Reques | |||
| author name = Miller G | |||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRP/RPB-A | |||
| addressee name = Chisum M | |||
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc | |||
| docket = 05000382 | |||
| license number = NPF-038 | |||
| contact person = Miller G | |||
| case reference number = TI-191 | |||
| document report number = 05000382/2017009, IR 2017009 | |||
| document type = Letter | |||
| page count = 7 | |||
}} | |||
See also: [[see also::IR 05000382/2017009]] | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | |||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
REGION IV | |||
1600 E. LAMAR BLVD. | |||
ARLINGTON, TX 76011-4511 | |||
July 5, 2017 | |||
Mr. Michael R. Chisum, Vice President | |||
Entergy Operations, Inc. | |||
17265 River Road | |||
Killona, LA 70057-0751 | |||
SUBJECT: WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3 - NOTIFICATION OF NRC | |||
INSPECTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MITIGATION STRATEGIES | |||
AND SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION ORDERS AND EMERGENCY | |||
PREPAREDNESS COMMUNICATION/ STAFFING/MULTI-UNIT DOSE | |||
ASSESSMENT PLANS (05000382/2017009) AND REQUEST FOR | |||
INFORMATION | |||
Dear Mr. Chisum: | |||
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | |||
staff will conduct a mitigation strategies for beyond-design-basis external events, spent fuel pool | |||
instrumentation, and emergency preparedness enhancements inspection at the Waterford | |||
Steam Electric Station, Unit 3, from September 18 - 22, 2017. The inspection will consist of | |||
three reactor inspectors from the NRCs Region IV office, plus one of the assigned Resident | |||
Inspectors at the Waterford Station for one week. The inspection will be conducted in | |||
accordance with the NRCs Temporary Instruction 2515/191, Inspection of the Implementation | |||
of Mitigating Strategies and Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Orders, and Emergency | |||
Preparedness Communication/ Staffing/Multi-Unit Dose Assessment Plans. | |||
Experience has shown that this inspection is resource intensive both for the NRC inspectors | |||
and licensee staff. In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources and to ensure a | |||
productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for this inspection | |||
activity. Please note that the documents are requested to be provided by September 1, 2017. | |||
During the onsite inspection, inspectors will verify that plans for complying with NRC Orders | |||
EA-12-049 and EA-12-051 are in place and are being implemented. Inspectors will also verify | |||
the establishment of staffing and communications plans provided in response to the March 12, | |||
2012, request for information letter, and multi-unit dose assessment information provided per | |||
COMSECY-13-0010, Schedule and Plans for Tier 2 Order on Emergency Preparedness for | |||
Japan Lessons Learned, dated March 27, 2013. These plans and information were provided in | |||
the site specific submittals, which were subsequently reviewed by the NRC staff for | |||
understanding and documented in the NRCs plant safety evaluations (SEs) and safety | |||
assessments. Therefore, appropriate personnel knowledgeable of the stations FLEX | |||
strategies, spent fuel pool instrumentation, and emergency preparedness enhancements should | |||
be available to support the inspectors at the site during the inspection. | |||
M. Chisum 2 | |||
We have discussed the schedule for this inspection activity with your staff and understand that | |||
our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Alan Harris of your licensing organization. If | |||
there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead | |||
inspector, Ryan D. Alexander, by telephone at 817-200-1195 or by e-mail at | |||
Ryan.Alexander@nrc.gov. | |||
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the | |||
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection | |||
requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control | |||
number 3150 0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to | |||
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the | |||
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control | |||
number. | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its | |||
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document | |||
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system | |||
(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading- | |||
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Geoffrey B. Miller, Chief | |||
Project Branch D | |||
Division of Reactor Projects | |||
Docket: 50-382 | |||
License: NPF-38 | |||
Enclosure: | |||
FLEX Strategies, Spent Fuel Pool | |||
Instrumentation, & EP Enhancements | |||
Inspection Request for Information | |||
Request for Information | |||
FLEX Strategies, Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, & EP Enhancements Inspection | |||
Waterford Station, Unit 3 | |||
Inspection Report: 05000382/2017009 | |||
Inspection Dates: September 18 - 22, 2017 | |||
Inspection Procedure: Temporary Instruction 2515/191, Inspection of the | |||
Implementation of Mitigating Strategies and Spent Fuel Pool | |||
Instrumentation Orders, and Emergency Preparedness | |||
Communication/Staffing/Multi-Unit Dose Assessment Plans | |||
Inspectors: Ryan D. Alexander, Team Lead, Sr. Project Engineer, Region IV | |||
Chris Speer, Waterford Resident Inspector | |||
John Mateychick, Sr. Reactor Inspector, Region IV | |||
Eduardo Uribe, Project Engineer, Region IV | |||
Information Requested for the In-Office Preparation Week | |||
The following information should be sent to the Region IV office in hard copy or electronic | |||
format (use of the Certrec IMS information portal is preferred), to the attention of Ryan | |||
Alexander, by September 1, 2017. The inspectors will select specific items from the information | |||
requested below and then request from your staff additional documents needed during the | |||
onsite inspection week. Also, we request that you categorize the documents in your response | |||
with the numbered list below. Please provide requested documentation electronically if possible. | |||
If requested documents are large and only hard copy formats are available, please inform the | |||
lead inspector, and provide subject documentation during the first day of the onsite inspection. | |||
If you have any questions regarding this information request, please call the lead inspector as | |||
soon as possible. | |||
TI 2515/191 - Appendix A | |||
A. Provide current revision of the FLEX Final Integrated Plan (i.e., current FLEX Program | |||
Document), including any revisions since July 2016 submission to the NRC. | |||
B. Provide the FLEX Strategy Basis Document. | |||
C. Provide each operating, off-normal, abnormal, and/or emergency procedures where entry | |||
into one or more FLEX Support Guideline(s) are initiated. | |||
D. Provide a list and copies of every FLEX Support Guideline (FSG) or equivalent procedure | |||
which you developed or revised to implement your mitigating strategies. | |||
E. Provide a list of key pieces of equipment that directly perform a FLEX mitigation strategy for | |||
core cooling (RCS and Steam Generators), containment, and/or spent fuel pool cooling. | |||
F. Provide a listing/summaries of plant modifications completed related to the FLEX program. | |||
G. Provide a listing of calculations, evaluations, and 50.59 reviews related to the FLEX program | |||
and modifications. | |||
1 Enclosure | |||
H. Applicable site specific hazards for the Waterford Station: | |||
1) Provide documents which show the locations and configuration of structure(s) which | |||
store FLEX equipment. | |||
2) Seismic | |||
a) Provide the travel route(s) for FLEX equipment from storage location(s) to their | |||
location(s) of use, AND evaluation(s) which demonstrate that for the potential for soil | |||
liquefaction is not of a concern for these travel route(s). | |||
b) Seismic concerns for water source(s) | |||
(1) If the FLEX water sources are seismically robust, then provide the assessment | |||
that shows that they are. | |||
(2) If the FLEX water sources are not seismically robust, then provide: | |||
(a) an assessment of alternate water sources, and | |||
(b) the procedure(s) which describe when and how to access those sources. | |||
3) External Flooding | |||
a) Provide description of where FLEX equipment is stored relative to protection from | |||
flood waters in accordance with site flood analysis. | |||
(1) If any FLEX equipment is stored below flood level, then (i) on an event timeline, | |||
show when that equipment will be needed; and (ii) provide the procedure(s) used | |||
to retrieve and deploy that equipment. | |||
b) Provide your plans/procedures to support successful FLEX equipment deployment | |||
for floods which persist over a long time period. | |||
c) If credited in the strategy, provide plans/procedures for storage and deployment of | |||
temporary flood barriers, including timeline of deployment strategy. | |||
4) Severe storms with high winds | |||
a) Provide evaluation/evidence as to how FLEX equipment is stored relative to | |||
protection from severe storms with high winds: | |||
(1) In a structure that meets the plants design basis for high wind hazards (e.g., | |||
existing safety-related structure); OR | |||
(2) In a structure that meets the design requirements as described in ASCE 7-10, | |||
Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, given the limiting | |||
tornado wind speeds from Regulatory Guide 1.76, and/or design-basis hurricane | |||
wind speeds. | |||
b) Provide pathways via which you plan to move FLEX equipment from onsite storage | |||
areas to final deployment locations. | |||
(1) Show how you designated and evaluated those pathways for post-storm | |||
accessibility for staging and connecting FLEX equipment. | |||
5) Snow, Ice, and Extreme Cold | |||
a) Provide procedures/documents demonstrating how the FLEX equipment can be | |||
moved from the storage location to its deployment location during ice storms. | |||
{Snow & Extreme Cold Screened Out for Waterford Station} | |||
2 | |||
6) Extreme high temperatures | |||
For each key piece of equipment described in Item 5 (above) that directly performs or | |||
implements a FLEX mitigation strategy: | |||
(a) Provide procedures/documents which describes the high-temperature limit of the | |||
range within which the equipment will function. | |||
(b) Provide procedures/documents which describe how the equipment is maintained | |||
below that limit in its storage location. | |||
I. Provide the station-specific FLEX strategies time validation study(ies). | |||
J. Provide the relevant station procedure(s)/guideline(s) which describe the testing and | |||
maintenance program for FLEX equipment. As applicable, provide a listing of the model | |||
work orders established to conduct period testing and maintenance activities for FLEX | |||
equipment. [A sample of records for completed maintenance/testing activities may be | |||
requested for review during the onsite inspection week.] | |||
K. Provide documents/procedures which describe the programmatic controls in place to ensure | |||
that if equipment and applicable connections are unavailable (e.g., due to maintenance, | |||
non-functionality), then compensatory measures are implemented in accordance with | |||
guidance outlined NEI 12-06. | |||
L. Provide the station-specific National SAFER Center Playbook | |||
M. Relative to personnel training on FLEX strategies, provide: | |||
1) FLEX training bases document(s) | |||
2) Lesson plans/training documents for site emergency response leaders responsible for | |||
the implementation of FLEX strategies. [Records for staff completing this training may be | |||
requested for review during the onsite inspection week.] | |||
3) Lesson plans/training documents for site personnel responsible for the execution of | |||
mitigating strategies for BDBEEs (i.e., operators, craft personnel, security, radiation | |||
protection, etc.). [Records for staff completing this training may be requested for review | |||
during the onsite inspection week.] | |||
N. A current copy of administrative procedure(s) for the CAP, modification program, operations | |||
procedure writing and implementation, and top-level documents for the work control and | |||
work scheduling programs. (If FLEX related procedures such as FSGs or the FIP are | |||
maintained under a different process, please include copies of those procedures.) | |||
O. A current copy of the U/FSAR, Technical Specifications, and Technical Specification Bases | |||
documents. | |||
P. Listing of corrective action program document summaries generated related to FLEX | |||
equipment, strategies, procedures, and/or training. | |||
Q. A copy of any audits/self-assessments related to your preparation for this inspection, as well | |||
as any related to the implementation or maintenance of the FLEX program. | |||
TI 2515/191 - Appendix B | |||
R. Provide the procedures implemented for maintenance, testing, calibration, and use of the | |||
primary and backup Spent Fuel Pool (SFP) instrumentation channels. | |||
S. Provide lesson plans/training documents which describe the training program that address | |||
the use, maintenance, calibration, surveillance, and the use of alternate power to the | |||
primary and backup SFP instrument channels. | |||
3 | |||
TI 2515/191 - Appendix C | |||
T. Communications: | |||
1) Provide documents which show that the communications system(s), technologies, | |||
equipment and power supplies would be available from the beginning of the event and | |||
operate during an ELAP. | |||
2) Provide the procedures and/or guidance used to implement the communication | |||
capabilities. | |||
3) Provide documents which show that you have added any new communications | |||
equipment, portable power supplies and/or systems have been added to ongoing testing | |||
and preventative maintenance programs. | |||
U. Staffing: | |||
1) Provide documents which show that onsite and augmented staff will be available to | |||
implement the strategies in response to a large scale natural event that results an ELAP | |||
and impedes access to the site, and that functions/tasks have been appropriately | |||
staffed. | |||
2) Provide documents which show that the site access methods (e.g., roadways, navigable | |||
bodies of water and dockage, airlift, etc.) expected to be available following the event | |||
and available to the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) [as described in the | |||
Phase 1 and 2 staffing assessments and NRC safety assessment]. | |||
3) Provide documents which show the testing, training, and drills/exercises performed by | |||
the station to demonstrate the EROs ability to utilize the communications systems | |||
and/or equipment. | |||
V. Provide documents and procedures which show that your dose assessment is capable of | |||
analyzing concurrent radiological releases from all on-site significant sources, including | |||
releases from spent fuel pools (i.e., multi-unit/multi-source dose assessment capability). | |||
Lead Inspector Contact Information: | |||
Ryan D. Alexander, Sr. Project Engineer Mailing Address: | |||
817-200-1195 U.S. NRC, Region IV | |||
Ryan.Alexander@nrc.gov Attn: Ryan Alexander, DRP | |||
1600 East Lamar Blvd. | |||
Arlington, TX 76011-4511 | |||
4 | |||
ML17186A421 | |||
SUNSI Review ADAMS: Sensitive Non-Publicly Available Keyword | |||
By: RDA/rdr Yes No Non-Sensitive Publicly Available NRC-002 | |||
OFFICE DRP/RPBA C:DRP/RPBD | |||
NAME RAlexander GMiller | |||
SIGNATURE /RA/ /RA/ | |||
DATE 07/05/2017 07/ 05/2017 | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 02:21, 30 October 2019
ML17186A421 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Waterford ![]() |
Issue date: | 07/05/2017 |
From: | Geoffrey Miller NRC/RGN-IV/DRP/RPB-A |
To: | Chisum M Entergy Operations |
Miller G | |
References | |
TI-191 05000382/2017009, IR 2017009 | |
Download: ML17186A421 (7) | |
See also: IR 05000382/2017009
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
1600 E. LAMAR BLVD.
ARLINGTON, TX 76011-4511
July 5, 2017
Mr. Michael R. Chisum, Vice President
Entergy Operations, Inc.
17265 River Road
Killona, LA 70057-0751
SUBJECT: WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3 - NOTIFICATION OF NRC
INSPECTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MITIGATION STRATEGIES
AND SPENT FUEL POOL INSTRUMENTATION ORDERS AND EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS COMMUNICATION/ STAFFING/MULTI-UNIT DOSE
ASSESSMENT PLANS (05000382/2017009) AND REQUEST FOR
INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Chisum:
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
staff will conduct a mitigation strategies for beyond-design-basis external events, spent fuel pool
instrumentation, and emergency preparedness enhancements inspection at the Waterford
Steam Electric Station, Unit 3, from September 18 - 22, 2017. The inspection will consist of
three reactor inspectors from the NRCs Region IV office, plus one of the assigned Resident
Inspectors at the Waterford Station for one week. The inspection will be conducted in
accordance with the NRCs Temporary Instruction 2515/191, Inspection of the Implementation
of Mitigating Strategies and Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Orders, and Emergency
Preparedness Communication/ Staffing/Multi-Unit Dose Assessment Plans.
Experience has shown that this inspection is resource intensive both for the NRC inspectors
and licensee staff. In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources and to ensure a
productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for this inspection
activity. Please note that the documents are requested to be provided by September 1, 2017.
During the onsite inspection, inspectors will verify that plans for complying with NRC Orders
EA-12-049 and EA-12-051 are in place and are being implemented. Inspectors will also verify
the establishment of staffing and communications plans provided in response to the March 12,
2012, request for information letter, and multi-unit dose assessment information provided per
COMSECY-13-0010, Schedule and Plans for Tier 2 Order on Emergency Preparedness for
Japan Lessons Learned, dated March 27, 2013. These plans and information were provided in
the site specific submittals, which were subsequently reviewed by the NRC staff for
understanding and documented in the NRCs plant safety evaluations (SEs) and safety
assessments. Therefore, appropriate personnel knowledgeable of the stations FLEX
strategies, spent fuel pool instrumentation, and emergency preparedness enhancements should
be available to support the inspectors at the site during the inspection.
M. Chisum 2
We have discussed the schedule for this inspection activity with your staff and understand that
our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Alan Harris of your licensing organization. If
there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead
inspector, Ryan D. Alexander, by telephone at 817-200-1195 or by e-mail at
Ryan.Alexander@nrc.gov.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection
requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control
number 3150 0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control
number.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system
(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Geoffrey B. Miller, Chief
Project Branch D
Division of Reactor Projects
Docket: 50-382
License: NPF-38
Enclosure:
FLEX Strategies, Spent Fuel Pool
Instrumentation, & EP Enhancements
Inspection Request for Information
Request for Information
FLEX Strategies, Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, & EP Enhancements Inspection
Waterford Station, Unit 3
Inspection Report: 05000382/2017009
Inspection Dates: September 18 - 22, 2017
Inspection Procedure: Temporary Instruction 2515/191, Inspection of the
Implementation of Mitigating Strategies and Spent Fuel Pool
Instrumentation Orders, and Emergency Preparedness
Communication/Staffing/Multi-Unit Dose Assessment Plans
Inspectors: Ryan D. Alexander, Team Lead, Sr. Project Engineer, Region IV
Chris Speer, Waterford Resident Inspector
John Mateychick, Sr. Reactor Inspector, Region IV
Eduardo Uribe, Project Engineer, Region IV
Information Requested for the In-Office Preparation Week
The following information should be sent to the Region IV office in hard copy or electronic
format (use of the Certrec IMS information portal is preferred), to the attention of Ryan
Alexander, by September 1, 2017. The inspectors will select specific items from the information
requested below and then request from your staff additional documents needed during the
onsite inspection week. Also, we request that you categorize the documents in your response
with the numbered list below. Please provide requested documentation electronically if possible.
If requested documents are large and only hard copy formats are available, please inform the
lead inspector, and provide subject documentation during the first day of the onsite inspection.
If you have any questions regarding this information request, please call the lead inspector as
soon as possible.
TI 2515/191 - Appendix A
A. Provide current revision of the FLEX Final Integrated Plan (i.e., current FLEX Program
Document), including any revisions since July 2016 submission to the NRC.
B. Provide the FLEX Strategy Basis Document.
C. Provide each operating, off-normal, abnormal, and/or emergency procedures where entry
into one or more FLEX Support Guideline(s) are initiated.
D. Provide a list and copies of every FLEX Support Guideline (FSG) or equivalent procedure
which you developed or revised to implement your mitigating strategies.
E. Provide a list of key pieces of equipment that directly perform a FLEX mitigation strategy for
core cooling (RCS and Steam Generators), containment, and/or spent fuel pool cooling.
F. Provide a listing/summaries of plant modifications completed related to the FLEX program.
G. Provide a listing of calculations, evaluations, and 50.59 reviews related to the FLEX program
and modifications.
1 Enclosure
H. Applicable site specific hazards for the Waterford Station:
1) Provide documents which show the locations and configuration of structure(s) which
store FLEX equipment.
2) Seismic
a) Provide the travel route(s) for FLEX equipment from storage location(s) to their
location(s) of use, AND evaluation(s) which demonstrate that for the potential for soil
liquefaction is not of a concern for these travel route(s).
b) Seismic concerns for water source(s)
(1) If the FLEX water sources are seismically robust, then provide the assessment
that shows that they are.
(2) If the FLEX water sources are not seismically robust, then provide:
(a) an assessment of alternate water sources, and
(b) the procedure(s) which describe when and how to access those sources.
3) External Flooding
a) Provide description of where FLEX equipment is stored relative to protection from
flood waters in accordance with site flood analysis.
(1) If any FLEX equipment is stored below flood level, then (i) on an event timeline,
show when that equipment will be needed; and (ii) provide the procedure(s) used
to retrieve and deploy that equipment.
b) Provide your plans/procedures to support successful FLEX equipment deployment
for floods which persist over a long time period.
c) If credited in the strategy, provide plans/procedures for storage and deployment of
temporary flood barriers, including timeline of deployment strategy.
4) Severe storms with high winds
a) Provide evaluation/evidence as to how FLEX equipment is stored relative to
protection from severe storms with high winds:
(1) In a structure that meets the plants design basis for high wind hazards (e.g.,
existing safety-related structure); OR
(2) In a structure that meets the design requirements as described in ASCE 7-10,
Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, given the limiting
tornado wind speeds from Regulatory Guide 1.76, and/or design-basis hurricane
wind speeds.
b) Provide pathways via which you plan to move FLEX equipment from onsite storage
areas to final deployment locations.
(1) Show how you designated and evaluated those pathways for post-storm
accessibility for staging and connecting FLEX equipment.
5) Snow, Ice, and Extreme Cold
a) Provide procedures/documents demonstrating how the FLEX equipment can be
moved from the storage location to its deployment location during ice storms.
{Snow & Extreme Cold Screened Out for Waterford Station}
2
6) Extreme high temperatures
For each key piece of equipment described in Item 5 (above) that directly performs or
implements a FLEX mitigation strategy:
(a) Provide procedures/documents which describes the high-temperature limit of the
range within which the equipment will function.
(b) Provide procedures/documents which describe how the equipment is maintained
below that limit in its storage location.
I. Provide the station-specific FLEX strategies time validation study(ies).
J. Provide the relevant station procedure(s)/guideline(s) which describe the testing and
maintenance program for FLEX equipment. As applicable, provide a listing of the model
work orders established to conduct period testing and maintenance activities for FLEX
equipment. [A sample of records for completed maintenance/testing activities may be
requested for review during the onsite inspection week.]
K. Provide documents/procedures which describe the programmatic controls in place to ensure
that if equipment and applicable connections are unavailable (e.g., due to maintenance,
non-functionality), then compensatory measures are implemented in accordance with
guidance outlined NEI 12-06.
L. Provide the station-specific National SAFER Center Playbook
M. Relative to personnel training on FLEX strategies, provide:
1) FLEX training bases document(s)
2) Lesson plans/training documents for site emergency response leaders responsible for
the implementation of FLEX strategies. [Records for staff completing this training may be
requested for review during the onsite inspection week.]
3) Lesson plans/training documents for site personnel responsible for the execution of
mitigating strategies for BDBEEs (i.e., operators, craft personnel, security, radiation
protection, etc.). [Records for staff completing this training may be requested for review
during the onsite inspection week.]
N. A current copy of administrative procedure(s) for the CAP, modification program, operations
procedure writing and implementation, and top-level documents for the work control and
work scheduling programs. (If FLEX related procedures such as FSGs or the FIP are
maintained under a different process, please include copies of those procedures.)
O. A current copy of the U/FSAR, Technical Specifications, and Technical Specification Bases
documents.
P. Listing of corrective action program document summaries generated related to FLEX
equipment, strategies, procedures, and/or training.
Q. A copy of any audits/self-assessments related to your preparation for this inspection, as well
as any related to the implementation or maintenance of the FLEX program.
TI 2515/191 - Appendix B
R. Provide the procedures implemented for maintenance, testing, calibration, and use of the
primary and backup Spent Fuel Pool (SFP) instrumentation channels.
S. Provide lesson plans/training documents which describe the training program that address
the use, maintenance, calibration, surveillance, and the use of alternate power to the
primary and backup SFP instrument channels.
3
TI 2515/191 - Appendix C
T. Communications:
1) Provide documents which show that the communications system(s), technologies,
equipment and power supplies would be available from the beginning of the event and
operate during an ELAP.
2) Provide the procedures and/or guidance used to implement the communication
capabilities.
3) Provide documents which show that you have added any new communications
equipment, portable power supplies and/or systems have been added to ongoing testing
and preventative maintenance programs.
U. Staffing:
1) Provide documents which show that onsite and augmented staff will be available to
implement the strategies in response to a large scale natural event that results an ELAP
and impedes access to the site, and that functions/tasks have been appropriately
staffed.
2) Provide documents which show that the site access methods (e.g., roadways, navigable
bodies of water and dockage, airlift, etc.) expected to be available following the event
and available to the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) [as described in the
Phase 1 and 2 staffing assessments and NRC safety assessment].
3) Provide documents which show the testing, training, and drills/exercises performed by
the station to demonstrate the EROs ability to utilize the communications systems
and/or equipment.
V. Provide documents and procedures which show that your dose assessment is capable of
analyzing concurrent radiological releases from all on-site significant sources, including
releases from spent fuel pools (i.e., multi-unit/multi-source dose assessment capability).
Lead Inspector Contact Information:
Ryan D. Alexander, Sr. Project Engineer Mailing Address:
817-200-1195 U.S. NRC, Region IV
Ryan.Alexander@nrc.gov Attn: Ryan Alexander, DRP
1600 East Lamar Blvd.
Arlington, TX 76011-4511
4
SUNSI Review ADAMS: Sensitive Non-Publicly Available Keyword
By: RDA/rdr Yes No Non-Sensitive Publicly Available NRC-002
OFFICE DRP/RPBA C:DRP/RPBD
NAME RAlexander GMiller
SIGNATURE /RA/ /RA/
DATE 07/05/2017 07/ 05/2017