ML20209A815: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML20209A815 | |||
| issue date = 04/22/1987 | |||
| title = App to SALP 6 Repts 50-373/86-06 & 50-374/86-07 for 851001-861115,summarizing 870313 Meeting | |||
| author name = | |||
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) | |||
| addressee name = | |||
| addressee affiliation = | |||
| docket = 05000373, 05000374 | |||
| license number = | |||
| contact person = | |||
| document report number = 50-373-86-06, 50-373-86-6, 50-374-86-07, 50-374-86-7, NUDOCS 8704280286 | |||
| package number = ML20209A740 | |||
| document type = SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS | |||
| page count = 3 | |||
}} | |||
See also: [[see also::IR 05000373/1986006]] | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:0 | |||
. | |||
APPENDIX | |||
SALP 6 | |||
SALP BOARD REPORT | |||
U.S. f;UCLEAR REGULATORY COM11SSION | |||
REGI0l4 III | |||
SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMAf4CE | |||
50-373/86006 50-374/86007 | |||
Inspection Report flo. | |||
Comonwealth Edison Company_ | |||
Name of Licensee | |||
laSalle County Nuclear Power Station | |||
Ndme Of facility | |||
October 1, 1985 through November 15,1986 | |||
Assessment Period | |||
8704280286 070422 | |||
gDR ADOCK 05000373 | |||
PDR | |||
I | |||
' | |||
.. , | |||
. | |||
. | |||
LaSalle County Nuclear Power Station | |||
Meeting Summary | |||
The findings and conclusions of the SALP Board are documented in Inspection | |||
Reports No. 50-373/86006 and No. 50-374/86007. They were discussed with the | |||
licensee on March 13, 1987, at the Brookfield Township Hall in Seneca, | |||
Illinois. The licensee's regulatory performance was presented in each | |||
functional area and it was noted that LaSalle had improved ratings from | |||
Category 3 to Category 2 in four functional areas. A decline in rating was | |||
noted in the area of Fire Protection / Housekeeping where the rating went from | |||
a Category 1 to a Category 2. In addition, the Category 2 rating for security | |||
showed a declining trend. | |||
The NRC acknowledged the improvements in performance at LaSalle over the | |||
assessement period and suggested continued attention be given by licensee | |||
management to improve further. | |||
While this meeting was primarily a iliscussion between the licensee and NRC, | |||
it was open to members of the public as observers. | |||
The following personnel attended the r.eeting. | |||
Consonwealth Edison Company ' | |||
B. Thomas, Executive Vice President | |||
C. Reed, Vice President, Nuclear Operations | |||
D. Galle, Assistant Vice President and General Manager, Nuclear Stations | |||
L. DelGeorge, Assistant Vice President Engineering and Licensing | |||
K. Graesser, Division Vice President, Nuclear Stations | |||
G. Diederich, Station Mancger, LaSalle | |||
M. Turbak, Nuclear Licensing ' | |||
L. Gerner, Regulatory Assurance Superintendent | |||
D. Demos District Superintendent | |||
. R. Stobert, Station Quality Assurance Superintendent | |||
i D. Scott, Nuclear Stations Division | |||
i' | |||
B. Stephenson, Department of Nuclear Safety i | |||
N. Wandke, Nuclear Services | |||
NRC - Region !!! | |||
A. B. Davis, Regional Administrator | |||
C. Norelius, Director, Division of Reactor Projects | |||
R. Warnick, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 1 | |||
M. Ring, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 1C | |||
G. Wright, Chief, Test Programs Section | |||
M. Jordon, Senior Resident inspector LaSalle | |||
J. Malloy, Resident inspector, LaSalle | |||
I | |||
L____________--_____--------------------- | |||
- | |||
* | |||
, | |||
. | |||
. | |||
NRC - Headquarters | |||
E. Adensam, Project Director, HRR | |||
A. Bournia, Project Manager, NRR | |||
Public | |||
R. Minue. Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety | |||
D. Muffler, Brookfield Resident | |||
H. Johnson, Brookfield Resident | |||
R. Widman, Brookfield Resident | |||
i | |||
2 | |||
1 | |||
. | |||
' | |||
* | |||
/n\ Commonwealth Edloon | |||
_ | |||
Enclosure 2 | |||
. | |||
( 4" )7One FwW Neonal | |||
Address % Chea00. | |||
Reply M | |||
to: Post Omco Box 767 | |||
\' V Chca00. Ilinois 60690 0767 | |||
April 6, 1987 | |||
Mr. A. Bert Davis | |||
Regional Administrator | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comunission | |||
Region III | |||
799 Roosevelt Road | |||
Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 | |||
Subject: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 | |||
SALp 6 Board Report | |||
NRC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374 | |||
Reference: A. Bert Davis letter to Cordell Reed dated | |||
March 9, 1987 | |||
Dear Mr. Davis: | |||
; On March 13, 1987, representatives of Commonwealth Edison Company met | |||
with you and members of your staff to discuss the SALP 6 Board Report transmit- | |||
ted by reference (a). | |||
Commonwealth Edison appreciated the opportunity to discuss the report | |||
with you. We acknowledge your conclusions in reference (a) that LaSalle | |||
Station " performance was found acceptable and directed toward safe facility | |||
operation", and has " improved regulatory performance during the agreement | |||
period". We have developed and implemented programs to improve Station | |||
performance and believe the improved operating performance in the latter half | |||
of 1986 highly reflects these initiatives. | |||
We recognize the need for continued management attention in | |||
surveillance, security and housekeeping. | |||
Overall, we believe this report is a good assessment of our | |||
; | |||
performance. | |||
We are encouraged that the NRC has seen an overall improvement in | |||
LaSalle Station's regulatory performance. The Station has challenged | |||
themselves in their goals program to continue their pursuit of excellence. | |||
Very t y yours, | |||
/ "_= - | |||
D. L. Farrar | |||
Director of Nuclear Licensing | |||
im | |||
. | |||
2938K APR 7 987 | |||
1 | |||
Mcf30ygr. a | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 13:07, 19 December 2021
ML20209A815 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | LaSalle |
Issue date: | 04/22/1987 |
From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML20209A740 | List: |
References | |
50-373-86-06, 50-373-86-6, 50-374-86-07, 50-374-86-7, NUDOCS 8704280286 | |
Download: ML20209A815 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000373/1986006
Text
0
.
APPENDIX
SALP 6
SALP BOARD REPORT
U.S. f;UCLEAR REGULATORY COM11SSION
REGI0l4 III
SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMAf4CE
50-373/86006 50-374/86007
Inspection Report flo.
Comonwealth Edison Company_
Name of Licensee
laSalle County Nuclear Power Station
Ndme Of facility
October 1, 1985 through November 15,1986
Assessment Period
8704280286 070422
gDR ADOCK 05000373
I
'
.. ,
.
.
LaSalle County Nuclear Power Station
Meeting Summary
The findings and conclusions of the SALP Board are documented in Inspection
Reports No. 50-373/86006 and No. 50-374/86007. They were discussed with the
licensee on March 13, 1987, at the Brookfield Township Hall in Seneca,
Illinois. The licensee's regulatory performance was presented in each
functional area and it was noted that LaSalle had improved ratings from
Category 3 to Category 2 in four functional areas. A decline in rating was
noted in the area of Fire Protection / Housekeeping where the rating went from
a Category 1 to a Category 2. In addition, the Category 2 rating for security
showed a declining trend.
The NRC acknowledged the improvements in performance at LaSalle over the
assessement period and suggested continued attention be given by licensee
management to improve further.
While this meeting was primarily a iliscussion between the licensee and NRC,
it was open to members of the public as observers.
The following personnel attended the r.eeting.
Consonwealth Edison Company '
B. Thomas, Executive Vice President
C. Reed, Vice President, Nuclear Operations
D. Galle, Assistant Vice President and General Manager, Nuclear Stations
L. DelGeorge, Assistant Vice President Engineering and Licensing
K. Graesser, Division Vice President, Nuclear Stations
G. Diederich, Station Mancger, LaSalle
M. Turbak, Nuclear Licensing '
L. Gerner, Regulatory Assurance Superintendent
D. Demos District Superintendent
. R. Stobert, Station Quality Assurance Superintendent
i D. Scott, Nuclear Stations Division
i'
B. Stephenson, Department of Nuclear Safety i
N. Wandke, Nuclear Services
NRC - Region !!!
A. B. Davis, Regional Administrator
C. Norelius, Director, Division of Reactor Projects
R. Warnick, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 1
M. Ring, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 1C
G. Wright, Chief, Test Programs Section
M. Jordon, Senior Resident inspector LaSalle
J. Malloy, Resident inspector, LaSalle
I
L____________--_____---------------------
-
,
.
.
NRC - Headquarters
E. Adensam, Project Director, HRR
A. Bournia, Project Manager, NRR
Public
R. Minue. Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety
D. Muffler, Brookfield Resident
H. Johnson, Brookfield Resident
R. Widman, Brookfield Resident
i
2
1
.
'
/n\ Commonwealth Edloon
_
Enclosure 2
.
( 4" )7One FwW Neonal
Address % Chea00.
Reply M
to: Post Omco Box 767
\' V Chca00. Ilinois 60690 0767
April 6, 1987
Mr. A. Bert Davis
Regional Administrator
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comunission
Region III
799 Roosevelt Road
Glen Ellyn, IL 60137
Subject: LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2
SALp 6 Board Report
NRC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374
Reference: A. Bert Davis letter to Cordell Reed dated
March 9, 1987
Dear Mr. Davis:
- On March 13, 1987, representatives of Commonwealth Edison Company met
with you and members of your staff to discuss the SALP 6 Board Report transmit-
ted by reference (a).
Commonwealth Edison appreciated the opportunity to discuss the report
with you. We acknowledge your conclusions in reference (a) that LaSalle
Station " performance was found acceptable and directed toward safe facility
operation", and has " improved regulatory performance during the agreement
period". We have developed and implemented programs to improve Station
performance and believe the improved operating performance in the latter half
of 1986 highly reflects these initiatives.
We recognize the need for continued management attention in
surveillance, security and housekeeping.
Overall, we believe this report is a good assessment of our
performance.
We are encouraged that the NRC has seen an overall improvement in
LaSalle Station's regulatory performance. The Station has challenged
themselves in their goals program to continue their pursuit of excellence.
Very t y yours,
/ "_= -
D. L. Farrar
Director of Nuclear Licensing
im
.
2938K APR 7 987
1
Mcf30ygr. a