ML15231A554: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML15231A554 | | number = ML15231A554 | ||
| issue date = 08/18/2015 | | issue date = 08/18/2015 | ||
| title = Ltr. 08/18/15 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Information for an NRC Triennial Pilot Baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (Inspection Report 05000315/2015008; 05000316/2015008) ( | | title = Ltr. 08/18/15 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Information for an NRC Triennial Pilot Baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (Inspection Report 05000315/2015008; 05000316/2015008) (Axd) | ||
| author name = Lipa C | | author name = Lipa C | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2 | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2 | ||
| addressee name = Weber L | | addressee name = Weber L | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 8 | | page count = 8 | ||
}} | }} | ||
See also: [[ | See also: [[see also::IR 05000315/2015008]] | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
REGION III | |||
2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210 | |||
LISLE, IL 60532-4352 | |||
August 18, 2015 | |||
Mr. Larry Weber | |||
Senior VP and Chief Nuclear Officer | |||
Indiana Michigan Power Company | |||
Nuclear Generation Group | |||
One Cook Place | |||
Bridgman, MI 49106 | |||
SUBJECT: DONALD. C. COOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST | |||
FOR INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL PILOT BASELINE COMPONENT | |||
DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (INSPECTION REPORT 05000315/2015008; | |||
05000316/2015008) | |||
Dear Mr. Weber: | |||
On November 2, 2015, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin the team | |||
portion of the triennial pilot baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at Donald C. | |||
Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. This inspection will be performed in accordance with | |||
NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure 71111.21T. A team of six inspectors will perform this | |||
2-week onsite pilot inspection. | |||
The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk-significant components | |||
associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The components to be reviewed | |||
during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office preparation weeks that occur | |||
prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated | |||
with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request | |||
scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from your | |||
simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions, which | |||
would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team will work closely with your | |||
staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with | |||
minimal impact. | |||
This pilot inspection will include two weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of six NRC | |||
inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance and one on operations. The | |||
current inspection schedule is as follows: | |||
* Preparatory weeks: October 19 -23, 2015; and | |||
October 26 - 30, 2015. | |||
* On-site inspection weeks: November 2 - 6, 2015; and | |||
November 16 - 20, 2015. | |||
Mr. | L. Weber -2- | ||
Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown | |||
that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the | |||
licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site, and to ensure a productive | |||
inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the | |||
inspection. | |||
It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the | |||
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of | |||
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead | |||
inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups: | |||
* The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities. | |||
This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than September 14, 2015. | |||
By September 30, 2015, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of | |||
approximately 10 components. | |||
* The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our in-office | |||
preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated with the | |||
initial selected components, should be provided to the lead inspector at the Regional Office | |||
no later than October 14, 2015. During the in-office preparation activities, the team may | |||
identify additional information needed to support the inspection. | |||
* The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific reference | |||
material. This information should be available to the team onsite on November 2, 2015. It is | |||
also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the | |||
inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents are generated. | |||
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Néstor Féliz-Adorno. We understand that our | |||
licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. John Nimtz of your organization. If there are any | |||
questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the | |||
lead inspector at (630) 829-9739, or via e-mail at Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov. | |||
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject | |||
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information | |||
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control | |||
Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required | |||
to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the | |||
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control | |||
Number. | |||
L. Weber -3- | |||
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public | |||
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy | |||
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public | |||
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) | |||
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). | |||
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html | |||
(the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Christine A. Lipa, Chief | |||
Engineering Branch 2 | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Docket Nos. 50-315; 50-316 | |||
License Nos. DPR-58; DPR-74 | |||
Enclosure: | |||
Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection | |||
c w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV | |||
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION | |||
Inspection Report: 05000315/2015008; 05000316/2015008 | |||
Inspection Dates: November 2 - 6, 2015; and | |||
November 16 - 20, 2015. | |||
Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21T, Component Design Bases Inspection (Teams) | |||
Lead Inspector: Néstor Féliz Adorno, Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS | |||
(630) 829-9739 | |||
Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov | |||
I. Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week | |||
The following information is requested by September 14, 2015, or sooner, to facilitate | |||
inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please | |||
call the team leader as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically | |||
in pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic | |||
media (e.g., CDROM, DVD, flash drive, etc.). The portable electronic media should | |||
contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. | |||
Information in lists should contain enough information to be easily understood by | |||
someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology). | |||
1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific Probabilistic Safety | |||
Analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth (RAW). Include values for | |||
Birnbaum Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley (as applicable). | |||
2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e. Large Early Release | |||
Frequency (LERF)) from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW. | |||
3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA. | |||
4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that | |||
contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency. | |||
5. Copies of PSA system notebooks, and latest PSA summary document. | |||
6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job | |||
performance measures. | |||
7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures. | |||
8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested | |||
in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative description of each | |||
coded event (including fire, flood zone description). | |||
Enclosure | |||
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION | |||
9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events, | |||
if available. | |||
10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with | |||
low-design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, | |||
diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated | |||
design heat removal etc.). | |||
11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction | |||
(identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and | |||
Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was determined. | |||
12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering or | |||
expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the PRA). | |||
13. Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category for | |||
the last 3 years. | |||
14. Site top 10 issues list (if applicable). | |||
15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years. | |||
16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last | |||
5 years at your facility. | |||
17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design issues | |||
initiated/completed in the last five years. | |||
18. List of open operability evaluations. | |||
19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming. | |||
20. Current management and engineering organizational chart. | |||
21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications, | |||
Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual. | |||
22. Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc), and key diagrams (paper copies). | |||
23. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs) (if available). | |||
II. Information Requested (for the approximate 10 selected components) to be | |||
Available by October 14, 2015, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional | |||
office during the weeks of October 19 - 23, 2015, and October 26 - 30, 2015). | |||
This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if | |||
provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations, | |||
condition reports, maintenance history, etc.). | |||
1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of the | |||
selected components for the last 6 years. | |||
2 | |||
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION | |||
2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with each | |||
of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of preventive | |||
maintenance activities. | |||
3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not | |||
previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also | |||
provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering | |||
requests, and vendor letters). Pipe stress calculations are excluded from this | |||
request. | |||
4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or | |||
Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components. | |||
5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes, | |||
associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a | |||
descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list | |||
only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications. | |||
6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with | |||
each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable. | |||
7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the | |||
selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable. | |||
8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected | |||
components, if applicable. | |||
9. Copy of latest completed surveillance tests for each component (e.g., for pumps this | |||
would include: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.; for valves: | |||
stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, etc.). Acceptance criteria basis | |||
calculations should also be included. | |||
10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with the | |||
selected components and selected scenarios. | |||
11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective action | |||
documents generated in preparation for the inspection. | |||
12. Copy of the last three completed tests and surveillances for each component, for | |||
example: | |||
* Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc. | |||
* Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc. | |||
* Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan | |||
flows, etc. | |||
Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included. | |||
13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years. | |||
3 | |||
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION 2 | INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION | ||
III. Additional Information to be Provided on November 2, 2015, Onsite (for final | |||
selected components) | |||
1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections and | |||
may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead | |||
inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of | |||
October 19 - 23, 2015. | |||
2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected | |||
components during the three onsite inspection weeks. | |||
IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection | |||
1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams | |||
questions or queries during this inspection. | |||
2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the | |||
status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection to | |||
each team member). | |||
3. One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies). | |||
4. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all on-site weeks): | |||
* Individual Plant Examination/ PRA report; | |||
* Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable); | |||
* Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); | |||
* Original Final Safety Analysis Report; and | |||
* Vendor manuals. | |||
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector. | |||
4 | |||
L. Weber -3- | |||
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public | |||
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy | |||
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public | |||
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) | |||
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). | |||
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html | |||
(the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Christine A. Lipa, Chief | |||
Engineering Branch 2 | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Docket Nos. 50-315; 50-316 | |||
License Nos. DPR-58; DPR-74 | |||
Enclosure: | |||
Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection | |||
c w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV | |||
DISTRIBUTION w/encl: | |||
Kimyata MorganButler | |||
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource | |||
RidsNrrPMDCCook Resource | |||
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource | |||
Cynthia Pederson | |||
Darrell Roberts | |||
Richard Skokowski | |||
Allan Barker | |||
Carole Ariano | |||
Linda Linn | |||
DRPIII | |||
DRSIII | |||
Jim Clay | |||
Carmen Olteanu | |||
ADAMS Accession Number ML15231A554 | |||
Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive | |||
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy | |||
OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII | |||
NAME ADunlop for NFéliz-Adorno:cl CLipa | |||
DATE 08/18/15 08/18/15 | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 22:50, 4 December 2019
ML15231A554 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cook ![]() |
Issue date: | 08/18/2015 |
From: | Christine Lipa NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2 |
To: | Weber L Indiana Michigan Power Co |
References | |
IR 2015008 | |
Download: ML15231A554 (8) | |
See also: IR 05000315/2015008
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210
LISLE, IL 60532-4352
August 18, 2015
Mr. Larry Weber
Senior VP and Chief Nuclear Officer
Indiana Michigan Power Company
Nuclear Generation Group
One Cook Place
Bridgman, MI 49106
SUBJECT: DONALD. C. COOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST
FOR INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL PILOT BASELINE COMPONENT
DESIGN BASES INSPECTION (INSPECTION REPORT 05000315/2015008;
Dear Mr. Weber:
On November 2, 2015, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin the team
portion of the triennial pilot baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. This inspection will be performed in accordance with
NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure 71111.21T. A team of six inspectors will perform this
2-week onsite pilot inspection.
The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk-significant components
associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The components to be reviewed
during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office preparation weeks that occur
prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated
with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request
scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from your
simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions, which
would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team will work closely with your
staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with
minimal impact.
This pilot inspection will include two weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of six NRC
inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance and one on operations. The
current inspection schedule is as follows:
- Preparatory weeks: October 19 -23, 2015; and
October 26 - 30, 2015.
- On-site inspection weeks: November 2 - 6, 2015; and
November 16 - 20, 2015.
L. Weber -2-
Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown
that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the
licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site, and to ensure a productive
inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the
inspection.
It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead
inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:
- The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.
This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than September 14, 2015.
By September 30, 2015, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of
approximately 10 components.
- The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our in-office
preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated with the
initial selected components, should be provided to the lead inspector at the Regional Office
no later than October 14, 2015. During the in-office preparation activities, the team may
identify additional information needed to support the inspection.
- The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific reference
material. This information should be available to the team onsite on November 2, 2015. It is
also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the
inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents are generated.
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Néstor Féliz-Adorno. We understand that our
licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. John Nimtz of your organization. If there are any
questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the
lead inspector at (630) 829-9739, or via e-mail at Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control
Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control
Number.
L. Weber -3-
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Christine A. Lipa, Chief
Engineering Branch 2
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-315; 50-316
Enclosure:
Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection
c w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
Inspection Report: 05000315/2015008; 05000316/2015008
Inspection Dates: November 2 - 6, 2015; and
November 16 - 20, 2015.
Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21T, Component Design Bases Inspection (Teams)
Lead Inspector: Néstor Féliz Adorno, Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS
(630) 829-9739
Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov
I. Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week
The following information is requested by September 14, 2015, or sooner, to facilitate
inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please
call the team leader as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically
in pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic
media (e.g., CDROM, DVD, flash drive, etc.). The portable electronic media should
contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.
Information in lists should contain enough information to be easily understood by
someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology).
1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific Probabilistic Safety
Analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth (RAW). Include values for
Birnbaum Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley (as applicable).
2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e. Large Early Release
Frequency (LERF)) from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW.
3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.
4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that
contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.
5. Copies of PSA system notebooks, and latest PSA summary document.
6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job
performance measures.
7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures.
8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested
in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative description of each
coded event (including fire, flood zone description).
Enclosure
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events,
if available.
10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with
low-design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure,
diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated
design heat removal etc.).
11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction
(identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and
Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was determined.
12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering or
expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the PRA).
13. Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category for
the last 3 years.
14. Site top 10 issues list (if applicable).
15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.
16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last
5 years at your facility.
17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design issues
initiated/completed in the last five years.
18. List of open operability evaluations.
19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming.
20. Current management and engineering organizational chart.
21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications,
Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual.
22. Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc), and key diagrams (paper copies).
23. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs) (if available).
II. Information Requested (for the approximate 10 selected components) to be
Available by October 14, 2015, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional
office during the weeks of October 19 - 23, 2015, and October 26 - 30, 2015).
This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if
provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,
condition reports, maintenance history, etc.).
1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of the
selected components for the last 6 years.
2
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with each
of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of preventive
maintenance activities.
3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not
previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also
provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering
requests, and vendor letters). Pipe stress calculations are excluded from this
request.
4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or
Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.
5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,
associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a
descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list
only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.
6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with
each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.
7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the
selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.
8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected
components, if applicable.
9. Copy of latest completed surveillance tests for each component (e.g., for pumps this
would include: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.; for valves:
stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, etc.). Acceptance criteria basis
calculations should also be included.
10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with the
selected components and selected scenarios.
11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective action
documents generated in preparation for the inspection.
12. Copy of the last three completed tests and surveillances for each component, for
example:
- Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.
- Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc.
- Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan
flows, etc.
Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.
13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.
3
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
III. Additional Information to be Provided on November 2, 2015, Onsite (for final
selected components)
1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections and
may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead
inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of
October 19 - 23, 2015.
2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected
components during the three onsite inspection weeks.
IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection
1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams
questions or queries during this inspection.
2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the
status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection to
each team member).
3. One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies).
4. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all on-site weeks):
- Individual Plant Examination/ PRA report;
- Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);
- Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.);
- Original Final Safety Analysis Report; and
- Vendor manuals.
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.
4
L. Weber -3-
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Christine A. Lipa, Chief
Engineering Branch 2
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-315; 50-316
Enclosure:
Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection
c w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV
DISTRIBUTION w/encl:
Kimyata MorganButler
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource
RidsNrrPMDCCook Resource
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
Cynthia Pederson
DRPIII
DRSIII
ADAMS Accession Number ML15231A554
Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy
OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII
NAME ADunlop for NFéliz-Adorno:cl CLipa
DATE 08/18/15 08/18/15
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY