ML071020505: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:I Alicia Williamson - EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule                                               Page I11 From:             "Scheffer, Jacob" <JScheff@entergy.com>
{{#Wiki_filter:I Alicia Williamson - EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule Page I11 From:  
To:               <arwl @nrc.gov>
"Scheffer, Jacob" <JScheff@entergy.com>
Date:             03/21/2007 3:19:50 PM
To:  
<arwl @nrc.gov>
Date:
03/21/2007 3:19:50 PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule Alicia:
EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule Alicia:
As a follow up to our conversation of yesterday, attached for your information is an EPA memo from Benjamin Grumbles, Assistant Administrator, to the Regional Administrators, informing them that the 316(b) rule should be considered suspended. At this point, I am not sure what this means for us, but hopefully clarification will be forthcoming.
As a follow up to our conversation of yesterday, attached for your information is an EPA memo from Benjamin Grumbles, Assistant Administrator, to the Regional Administrators, informing them that the 316(b) rule should be considered suspended. At this point, I am not sure what this means for us, but hopefully clarification will be forthcoming.
Jay CC:               "Bethay, Stephen" <SBethay@entergy.com>, "Mogolesko, Fred"
Jay CC:  
              <fmogole@entergy.com>, "Ford, Bryan" <BFord@entergy.com>
"Bethay, Stephen" <SBethay@entergy.com>, "Mogolesko, Fred"
<fmogole@entergy.com>, "Ford, Bryan" <BFord@entergy.com>


I c:\temp\GW)00006.TMP                                                                               Page I c:~temp~(~VV1UUOU~.TMP                                                                             Page 11 I Mail Envelope Properties       (46018550.338: 11 : 21304)
I c:\\temp\\GW)00006.TMP Page 1 I c:~temp~(~VV1UUOU~.TMP Page 1 I Mail Envelope Properties (46018550.338: 11 : 21304)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule Creation Date            03/21/2007 3:19:23 PM From:                    "Scheffer, Jacob" <JScheff(@entergy.com>
Creation Date From:
Created By:              JScheff(,entergM.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 ARWI (Alicia Williamson) entergy.corn BFord CC (Bryan Ford) finogole CC (Fred Mogolesko)
Created By:
EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule 03/21/2007 3:19:23 PM "Scheffer, Jacob" <JScheff(@entergy.com>
JScheff(,entergM.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 ARWI (Alicia Williamson) entergy.corn BFord CC (Bryan Ford) finogole CC (Fred Mogolesko)
SBethay CC (Stephen Bethay)
SBethay CC (Stephen Bethay)
Post Office                                                               Route TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01                                                       nrc.gov entergy.comr Files                             Size               Date & Time MESSAGE                         373                 03/21/2007 3:19:23 PM TEXT.htm ,                      2436 image00l .gif                   862 EPA suspends 316b Phase II Rule 20 Mar 07.pdf       73253 Mime.822                         107840 Options Expiration Date:                 None Priority:                       Standard ReplyRequested:                 No Return Notification:             None Concealed  
Post Office TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 Files Size MESSAGE 373 TEXT.htm 2436 image00l.gif 862 EPA suspends 316b Phase II Rule 20 Mar 07.pdf Mime.822 107840 Route nrc.gov entergy.comr Date & Time 03/21/2007 3:19:23 PM 73253 Options Expiration Date:
Priority:
ReplyRequested:
Return Notification:
Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
No Security:                       Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User
Security:
None Standard No None No Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User


                                                                                                                                                      ]
I Alicia Williamson - EPA suspends 316b Phase 11 Rule 20 Mar 07.pdf
I Alicia Williamson - EPA suspends 316b Phase 11Rule 20 Mar 07.pdf                                                                           Page I I L~iciW,,sn-           P sspns,1b                 hse-       Ru...e 20Mr0.                                                                 ae1i rm                   UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 P,,u*r&#xb6;2 0     iA&
]
MEMORANDUM                                                                                             OWFT OF
Page I I L~iciW,  
,sn-P sspns,1b hse-Ru...e 20Mr0.
ae1i rm UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 P,,u*r&#xb6; 2 0 iA&
MEMORANDUM OWFT OF


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Implementation of the Decision in Riverkeeper,Inc. v. EPA, Remanding the Cooling Water Intake Structures Phase 11Regul ion                     0 FROM:               Benjamin Grumbles, Assistant Admini TO:                 Regional Administrators The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance on the status of the Cooling Water Intake Structures Phase II regulation under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act ("Phase II rule" or "Rule"). The Phase 11 rule set national standards for cooling water withdrawals by large, existing power producing facilities ("Phase II facilities"). See 40 C.F.R. Part 125 Subpart J; 69 Fed. Reg. 41576 (July 6, 2004).The Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in the litigation over the Phase 11 regulation. SE Riverkeeper. Inc., v. EPA, No. 04-6692, (2d Cir. Jan. 25, 2007).
Implementation of the Decision in Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA, Remanding the Cooling Water Intake Structures Phase 11Regul ion 0
FROM:
Benjamin Grumbles, Assistant Admini TO:
Regional Administrators The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance on the status of the Cooling Water Intake Structures Phase II regulation under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act ("Phase II rule" or "Rule"). The Phase 11 rule set national standards for cooling water withdrawals by large, existing power producing facilities ("Phase II facilities"). See 40 C.F.R. Part 125 Subpart J; 69 Fed. Reg. 41576 (July 6, 2004).The Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in the litigation over the Phase 11 regulation. SE Riverkeeper. Inc., v. EPA, No. 04-6692, (2d Cir. Jan. 25, 2007).
The court's decision remanded several provisions ofthe Rule on various grounds.
The court's decision remanded several provisions ofthe Rule on various grounds.
The provisions remanded include:
The provisions remanded include:
                                  "   EPA's determination of the Best Technology Available under section 316(b);
" EPA's determination of the Best Technology Available under section 316(b);
                                  "   The Rule's performance standard ranges;
" The Rule's performance standard ranges;
                                  "   The cost-cost and cost-benefit compliance alternatives;
" The cost-cost and cost-benefit compliance alternatives;
                                  "   The Technology Installation and Operation Plan provision;
" The Technology Installation and Operation Plan provision;
* The restoration provisions; and
* The restoration provisions; and
                                  "   The "independent supplier" provision.
" The "independent supplier" provision.
With so many provisions of the Phase II rule affected by the decision, the rule should be considered suspended. I anticipate issuing a Federal Register notice formally suspending the Rule in the near future.' In the meantime, all permits for Phase I1 facilities should include conditions under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act developed on a Best Professional Judgment basis. See 40 C.F.R. &sect; 401.14.
With so many provisions of the Phase II rule affected by the decision, the rule should be considered suspended. I anticipate issuing a Federal Register notice formally suspending the Rule in the near future.' In the meantime, all permits for Phase I1 facilities should include conditions under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act developed on a Best Professional Judgment basis. See 40 C.F.R. &sect; 401.14.
If you have questions regarding the application of section 316(b) at Phase 11 facilities, please contact either Janet Goodwin with the Office ofScience and Technology at 202-566-1060 (goodwin.ianet*,,epa.nov) or Deborah Nagle with the Office of Wastewater Management at 202-564-I 185 (nagle.deborah(iiepa.gov .
If you have questions regarding the application of section 316(b) at Phase 11 facilities, please contact either Janet Goodwin with the Office ofScience and Technology at 202-566-1060 (goodwin.ianet*,,epa.nov) or Deborah Nagle with the Office of Wastewater Management at 202-564-I 185 (nagle.deborah(iiepa.gov.
1 In.the event that the court's decision is overturned prior to publication of the Federal Register notice. then I will nol proceed to effect the suspension; if'the court's decision is overturned after publication of the notice, the Agency will take appropriate action in response.
1 In.the event that the court's decision is overturned prior to publication of the Federal Register notice. then I will nol proceed to effect the suspension; if'the court's decision is overturned after publication of the notice, the Agency will take appropriate action in response.
kWemall Address(URL) 0 ttlpJwWw.sa.gov Nteacled~ecycbl~oe 0 Prined withVegetable OilBasedlrfton 100%Poslcorisumer, Proces~s Ohlonre FreeRecycledPaper}}
kWemall Address (URL) 0 ttlpJwWw.sa.gov Nteacled~ecycbl~oe 0 Prined with Vegetable Oil Based lrfton 100% Poslcorisumer, Proces~s Ohlonre Free Recycled Paper}}

Latest revision as of 02:12, 15 January 2025

E-MAIL: (PA) EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule
ML071020505
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 03/21/2007
From: Scheffer J
Entergy Corp
To: Williamson A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TAC MD3698
Download: ML071020505 (3)
v • d • e


Text

I Alicia Williamson - EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule Page I11 From:

"Scheffer, Jacob" <JScheff@entergy.com>

To:

<arwl @nrc.gov>

Date:

03/21/2007 3:19:50 PM

Subject:

EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule Alicia:

As a follow up to our conversation of yesterday, attached for your information is an EPA memo from Benjamin Grumbles, Assistant Administrator, to the Regional Administrators, informing them that the 316(b) rule should be considered suspended. At this point, I am not sure what this means for us, but hopefully clarification will be forthcoming.

Jay CC:

"Bethay, Stephen" <SBethay@entergy.com>, "Mogolesko, Fred"

<fmogole@entergy.com>, "Ford, Bryan" <BFord@entergy.com>

I c:\\temp\\GW)00006.TMP Page 1 I c:~temp~(~VV1UUOU~.TMP Page 1 I Mail Envelope Properties (46018550.338: 11 : 21304)

Subject:

Creation Date From:

Created By:

EPA Suspends 316(b) Rule 03/21/2007 3:19:23 PM "Scheffer, Jacob" <JScheff(@entergy.com>

JScheff(,entergM.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 ARWI (Alicia Williamson) entergy.corn BFord CC (Bryan Ford) finogole CC (Fred Mogolesko)

SBethay CC (Stephen Bethay)

Post Office TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 Files Size MESSAGE 373 TEXT.htm 2436 image00l.gif 862 EPA suspends 316b Phase II Rule 20 Mar 07.pdf Mime.822 107840 Route nrc.gov entergy.comr Date & Time 03/21/2007 3:19:23 PM 73253 Options Expiration Date:

Priority:

ReplyRequested:

Return Notification:

Concealed

Subject:

Security:

None Standard No None No Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User

I Alicia Williamson - EPA suspends 316b Phase 11 Rule 20 Mar 07.pdf

]

Page I I L~iciW,

,sn-P sspns,1b hse-Ru...e 20Mr0.

ae1i rm UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 P,,u*r¶ 2 0 iA&

MEMORANDUM OWFT OF

SUBJECT:

Implementation of the Decision in Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA, Remanding the Cooling Water Intake Structures Phase 11Regul ion 0

FROM:

Benjamin Grumbles, Assistant Admini TO:

Regional Administrators The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance on the status of the Cooling Water Intake Structures Phase II regulation under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act ("Phase II rule" or "Rule"). The Phase 11 rule set national standards for cooling water withdrawals by large, existing power producing facilities ("Phase II facilities"). See 40 C.F.R. Part 125 Subpart J; 69 Fed. Reg. 41576 (July 6, 2004).The Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in the litigation over the Phase 11 regulation. SE Riverkeeper. Inc., v. EPA, No. 04-6692, (2d Cir. Jan. 25, 2007).

The court's decision remanded several provisions ofthe Rule on various grounds.

The provisions remanded include:

" EPA's determination of the Best Technology Available under section 316(b);

" The Rule's performance standard ranges;

" The cost-cost and cost-benefit compliance alternatives;

" The Technology Installation and Operation Plan provision;

  • The restoration provisions; and

" The "independent supplier" provision.

With so many provisions of the Phase II rule affected by the decision, the rule should be considered suspended. I anticipate issuing a Federal Register notice formally suspending the Rule in the near future.' In the meantime, all permits for Phase I1 facilities should include conditions under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act developed on a Best Professional Judgment basis. See 40 C.F.R. § 401.14.

If you have questions regarding the application of section 316(b) at Phase 11 facilities, please contact either Janet Goodwin with the Office ofScience and Technology at 202-566-1060 (goodwin.ianet*,,epa.nov) or Deborah Nagle with the Office of Wastewater Management at 202-564-I 185 (nagle.deborah(iiepa.gov.

1 In.the event that the court's decision is overturned prior to publication of the Federal Register notice. then I will nol proceed to effect the suspension; if'the court's decision is overturned after publication of the notice, the Agency will take appropriate action in response.

kWemall Address (URL) 0 ttlpJwWw.sa.gov Nteacled~ecycbl~oe 0 Prined with Vegetable Oil Based lrfton 100% Poslcorisumer, Proces~s Ohlonre Free Recycled Paper

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML071020505&oldid=5348509"