IR 05000263/2007302: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 23: Line 23:
MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT NRC INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION REPORT 05000263/2007302(DRS)
MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT NRC INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION REPORT 05000263/2007302(DRS)


==Dear Mr. O'Connor:==
==Dear Mr. OConnor:==
On October 3, 2007, Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP) trainers administered an initial operator license re-take written examination to a license applicant that failed the February 2007 initial license written examination. The enclosed report documents the results of the re-take examination which were discussed on October 3, 2007, with Mr. J. Earl, MNGP Operations Training Supervisor. There were no post-examination comments submitted by the facility.
On October 3, 2007, Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP) trainers administered an initial operator license re-take written examination to a license applicant that failed the February 2007 initial license written examination. The enclosed report documents the results of the re-take examination which were discussed on October 3, 2007, with Mr. J. Earl, MNGP Operations Training Supervisor. There were no post-examination comments submitted by the facility.


Line 34: Line 34:
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
/RA/
/RA/
Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety  
Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-22
 
Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-22  


===Enclosures:===
===Enclosures:===
1. Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000263/2007302(DRS)
1. Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000263/2007302(DRS)
w/Attachment: Supplemental Information 2. Simulation Facility Report 3. Written Examinations and Answer Keys (RO/SRO)  
w/Attachment: Supplemental Information 2. Simulation Facility Report 3. Written Examinations and Answer Keys (RO/SRO)


REGION III==
REGION III==
 
Docket No: 50-263 License No: DPR-22 Report No: 05000263/2007302 Licensee: Nuclear Management Company, LLC Facility: Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Location: Monticello, Minnesota Date: October 3, 2007 Examiner: D. McNeil, Senior Operations Engineer Approved by: Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure 1
Docket No: 50-263 License No: DPR-22  
 
Report No: 05000263/2007302  
 
Licensee: Nuclear Management Company, LLC  
 
Facility: Monticello Nuclear Gener ating Plant  
 
Location: Monticello, Minnesota  
 
Date: October 3, 2007  
 
Examiner: D. McNeil, Senior Operations Engineer  
 
Approved by: Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure 1 1  


=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
ER 05000263/2007302(DRS); 10/03/2007; Nuclear Management Company, LLC,  
ER 05000263/2007302(DRS); 10/03/2007; Nuclear Management Company, LLC,


Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. Initial License Examination Report.
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. Initial License Examination Report.
Line 67: Line 50:
A written re-take initial operator licensing examination was administered by Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant training department personnel in accordance with the guidance of NUREG-1021, AOperator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ Revision 9.
A written re-take initial operator licensing examination was administered by Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant training department personnel in accordance with the guidance of NUREG-1021, AOperator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ Revision 9.


Examination Summary
Examination Summary:
:
One Senior Reactor Operator applicant passed the written re-take examination. The operating test was waived based on the applicants performance on a previous NRC examination. The applicant was issued a Senior Reactor Operator license. (Section 4OA5.1).
One Senior Reactor Operator applicant passed the written re-take examination. The operating test was waived based on the applicant's performance on a previous NRC examination. The applicant was issued a Senior Reactor Operator license. (Section 4OA5.1).
 
2


=REPORT DETAILS=
=REPORT DETAILS=
Line 82: Line 62:


====a. Examination Scope====
====a. Examination Scope====
Members of the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Training Department prepared the examination outline and developed the written examination. The operating test was waived for the applicant based on the applicant's performance on a February 2007 license examination. The training staff administered the written re-take examination on October 3, 2007. The station
Members of the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Training Department prepared the examination outline and developed the written examination. The operating test was waived for the applicant based on the applicants performance on a February 2007 license examination. The training staff administered the written re-take examination on October 3, 2007. The station=s examination developers and the NRC examiners used the guidance established in NUREG-1021, AOperator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ Revision 9, to prepare, validate, revise, administer, and grade the examination.
=s examination developers and the NRC examiners used the guidance established in NUREG-1021, AOperator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ Revision 9, to prepare, validate, revise, administer, and grade the examination.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Written Examination During the validation of the written examination several questions were modified or replaced as requested by the NRC examiners. Changes made to the written examination were documented on Form ES-401-9, AWritten Examination Review Worksheet,@ which is available electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). Less than 20 percent of the examination was considered unsatisfactory for examination use and therefore, met the NRC
Written Examination During the validation of the written examination several questions were modified or replaced as requested by the NRC examiners. Changes made to the written examination were documented on Form ES-401-9, AWritten Examination Review Worksheet,@ which is available electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). Less than 20 percent of the examination was considered unsatisfactory for examination use and therefore, met the NRC=s expectations for a submitted examination. There were no comments from the NRC examiners on the submitted examination outline. The licensee stated that there were no written examination post-examination comments for consideration by the NRC examiners. The NRC examiners graded the written examination on October 25, 2007.
=s expectations for a submitted examination. There were no comments from the NRC examiners on the submitted examination outline. The licensee stated that there were no written examination post-examination comments for consideration by the NRC examiners. The NRC examiners graded the written examination on October 25, 2007.


Operating Test
Operating Test Because of the applicants performance on the operating test administered during February 2007, the applicants request for a waiver of an operating test was granted. No operating test was developed for this examination.
 
Because of the applicant's performance on the operating test administered during February 2007, the applicant's request for a waiver of an operating test was granted. No operating test was developed for this examination.


Examination Results The Senior Reactor Operator applicant was administered a written retake examination.
Examination Results The Senior Reactor Operator applicant was administered a written retake examination.
Line 100: Line 76:


====a. Scope====
====a. Scope====
The NRC examiners reviewed the licensee's implementation of examination security requirements during the examination development and administration to assure compliance with 10 CFR 55.49, AIntegrity of Examinations and Tests.
The NRC examiners reviewed the licensee's implementation of examination security requirements during the examination development and administration to assure compliance with 10 CFR 55.49, AIntegrity of Examinations and Tests.@ The examiners used the guidelines provided in NUREG 1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ to determine acceptability of the licensee=s examination security activities.
 
@ The examiners used the guidelines provided in NUREG 1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ to determine acceptability of the licensee
=s examination security activities.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were observed in the area of examination security.
No findings of significance were observed in the area of examination security.
 
{{a|4OA6}}
{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Meetings==
==4OA6 Meetings==


Exit Meeting The chief examiner, Mr. Dell McNeil, Senior Operations Engineer, and Mr. John Earl, Operations Training Manager, discussed the station's preliminary grading results for the re-take written examination on October 3, 2007. The chief examiner asked the licensee whether any of the material used to develop or administer the examination should be considered proprietary. No proprietary or sensitive information was identified during the examination development or exit meeting.
Exit Meeting The chief examiner, Mr. Dell McNeil, Senior Operations Engineer, and Mr. John Earl, Operations Training Manager, discussed the stations preliminary grading results for the re-take written examination on October 3, 2007. The chief examiner asked the licensee whether any of the material used to develop or administer the examination should be considered proprietary. No proprietary or sensitive information was identified during the examination development or exit meeting.


ATTACHMENT:
ATTACHMENT:  


=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
Line 119: Line 91:
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==


Licensee  
Licensee
: [[contact::J. Earl]], Monticello Operations Training Supervisor  
: [[contact::J. Earl]], Monticello Operations Training Supervisor
 
NRC
NRC  
: [[contact::D. McNeil]], Senior Operations Engineer
: [[contact::D. McNeil]], Senior Operations Engineer  


==ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
==ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
Line 129: Line 100:
===Opened, Closed, and Discussed===
===Opened, Closed, and Discussed===


None  
None


==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==


}}
}}

Latest revision as of 06:23, 22 December 2019

Er 05000263-07-302(DRS); 10/03/2007, Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, NRC Initial License Examination Report
ML073100394
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/31/2007
From: Hironori Peterson
Operations Branch III
To: O'Connor T
Nuclear Management Co
References
IR-07-302
Download: ML073100394 (12)


Text

ber 31, 2007

SUBJECT:

MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT NRC INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION REPORT 05000263/2007302(DRS)

Dear Mr. OConnor:

On October 3, 2007, Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP) trainers administered an initial operator license re-take written examination to a license applicant that failed the February 2007 initial license written examination. The enclosed report documents the results of the re-take examination which were discussed on October 3, 2007, with Mr. J. Earl, MNGP Operations Training Supervisor. There were no post-examination comments submitted by the facility.

One Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicant was administered a re-take written examination.

The applicant was a previously licensed Reactor Operator at MNGP. The result of the examination was finalized on October 30, 2007. The applicant passed the re-take written examination and was issued a Senior Reactor Operator license.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this examination.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-22

Enclosures:

1. Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000263/2007302(DRS)

w/Attachment: Supplemental Information 2. Simulation Facility Report 3. Written Examinations and Answer Keys (RO/SRO)

REGION III==

Docket No: 50-263 License No: DPR-22 Report No: 05000263/2007302 Licensee: Nuclear Management Company, LLC Facility: Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Location: Monticello, Minnesota Date: October 3, 2007 Examiner: D. McNeil, Senior Operations Engineer Approved by: Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure 1

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

ER 05000263/2007302(DRS); 10/03/2007; Nuclear Management Company, LLC,

Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. Initial License Examination Report.

A written re-take initial operator licensing examination was administered by Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant training department personnel in accordance with the guidance of NUREG-1021, AOperator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ Revision 9.

Examination Summary:

One Senior Reactor Operator applicant passed the written re-take examination. The operating test was waived based on the applicants performance on a previous NRC examination. The applicant was issued a Senior Reactor Operator license. (Section 4OA5.1).

REPORT DETAILS

OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)

4OA5 Other

.1 Initial Licensing Examinations

a. Examination Scope

Members of the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Training Department prepared the examination outline and developed the written examination. The operating test was waived for the applicant based on the applicants performance on a February 2007 license examination. The training staff administered the written re-take examination on October 3, 2007. The station=s examination developers and the NRC examiners used the guidance established in NUREG-1021, AOperator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ Revision 9, to prepare, validate, revise, administer, and grade the examination.

b. Findings

Written Examination During the validation of the written examination several questions were modified or replaced as requested by the NRC examiners. Changes made to the written examination were documented on Form ES-401-9, AWritten Examination Review Worksheet,@ which is available electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). Less than 20 percent of the examination was considered unsatisfactory for examination use and therefore, met the NRC=s expectations for a submitted examination. There were no comments from the NRC examiners on the submitted examination outline. The licensee stated that there were no written examination post-examination comments for consideration by the NRC examiners. The NRC examiners graded the written examination on October 25, 2007.

Operating Test Because of the applicants performance on the operating test administered during February 2007, the applicants request for a waiver of an operating test was granted. No operating test was developed for this examination.

Examination Results The Senior Reactor Operator applicant was administered a written retake examination.

The applicant passed the examination and was issued an operating license.

.2 Examination Security

a. Scope

The NRC examiners reviewed the licensee's implementation of examination security requirements during the examination development and administration to assure compliance with 10 CFR 55.49, AIntegrity of Examinations and Tests.@ The examiners used the guidelines provided in NUREG 1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ to determine acceptability of the licensee=s examination security activities.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were observed in the area of examination security.

4OA6 Meetings

Exit Meeting The chief examiner, Mr. Dell McNeil, Senior Operations Engineer, and Mr. John Earl, Operations Training Manager, discussed the stations preliminary grading results for the re-take written examination on October 3, 2007. The chief examiner asked the licensee whether any of the material used to develop or administer the examination should be considered proprietary. No proprietary or sensitive information was identified during the examination development or exit meeting.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee

J. Earl, Monticello Operations Training Supervisor

NRC

D. McNeil, Senior Operations Engineer

ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

Opened, Closed, and Discussed

None

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED