ML11336A355: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 12/02/2011 | | issue date = 12/02/2011 | ||
| title = Ltr 12/2/2011 Davis-Besse CAL 3-11-001 | | title = Ltr 12/2/2011 Davis-Besse CAL 3-11-001 | ||
| author name = Pederson C | | author name = Pederson C | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/ORA | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/ORA | ||
| addressee name = Allen B | | addressee name = Allen B | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 December 2, 2011 | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 December 2, 2011 CAL No. 3-11-001 Mr. Barry Allen Site Vice President FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station 5501 North State Route 2, Mail Stop A-DB-3080 Oak Harbor, OH 43449-9760 | ||
CAL No. 3-11-001 Mr. Barry Allen Site Vice President | |||
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company | |||
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station 5501 North State Route 2, Mail Stop A-DB-3080 Oak Harbor, OH 43449-9760 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER - DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION | CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER - DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION | ||
==Dear Mr. Allen:== | ==Dear Mr. Allen:== | ||
This letter confirms commitments by | This letter confirms commitments by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) regarding the identification of cracks in the reinforced concrete shield building at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station. During the recent mid-cycle outage to replace the reactor vessel closure head, which began on October 1, 2011, FENOC discovered laminar cracking in the safety-related shield building of the containment system while performing hydrodemolition operations. Based on an evaluation of FENOCs extent of condition and technical analysis of the Davis-Besse shield building laminar cracking, the NRC staff concluded that FENOC provided reasonable assurance that the shield building is capable of performing its safety functions. In order to provide continued long-term confidence, FENOC has agreed in telephone conversations between you, Steven West, and Steven Reynolds, on November 21, 2011; a followup telephone conversation between you and Jamnes Cameron on November 22, 2011; in a FENOC commitment letter dated November 23, 2011 (ML11329A033); and a telephone conversation between you and Steven Reynolds on December 2, 2011, to the following actions (both completed and planned): | ||
: 1. FENOC will provide the results of the root cause evaluation and corrective actions to the NRC, including any long-term monitoring requirements, by February 28, 2012. | : 1. FENOC will provide the results of the root cause evaluation and corrective actions to the NRC, including any long-term monitoring requirements, by February 28, 2012. | ||
: 2. FENOC will identify four shield building locations, which were core bored during this evaluation, for examination. These uncracked locations will be directly adjacent to locations that have been confirmed to be cracked. The four uncracked locations, as designated on FENOC drawing C-111A, are: | : 2. FENOC will identify four shield building locations, which were core bored during this evaluation, for examination. These uncracked locations will be directly adjacent to locations that have been confirmed to be cracked. The four uncracked locations, as designated on FENOC drawing C-111A, are: | ||
: a. adjacent to a flute shoulder [S9-666.0-12]; | : a. adjacent to a flute shoulder [S9-666.0-12]; | ||
: b. in a flute area [F4-1-666.0-3]; c. adjacent to Main Steam Line penetration 39 [S7-652.0-6.5]; and d. adjacent to Main Steam Line penetration 40 [S9-650.0-9]. | : b. in a flute area [F4-1-666.0-3]; | ||
B. Allen | : c. adjacent to Main Steam Line penetration 39 [S7-652.0-6.5]; and | ||
: d. adjacent to Main Steam Line penetration 40 [S9-650.0-9]. | |||
B. Allen 3. FENOC will examine the four core bore locations from Commitment 2 above with a borescope to verify cracking has not migrated to these core bores located in solid (i.e., uncracked) concrete, within 90 days following plant restart (Mode 2) from the 2011 mid-cycle outage. | |||
: 4. FENOC will examine the crack interface to identify any changes by performing a core bore in a known crack area within the Main Steam Line Room, within 90 days following plant restart (Mode 2) from the October 2011 mid-cycle outage. | : 4. FENOC will examine the crack interface to identify any changes by performing a core bore in a known crack area within the Main Steam Line Room, within 90 days following plant restart (Mode 2) from the October 2011 mid-cycle outage. | ||
: 5. FENOC will identify two additional shield building locations, which were core bored during this evaluation, for examination. These uncracked locations will be directly adjacent to locations that have been confirmed to be cracked. The two uncracked locations, as designated on FENOC drawing C-111A, are: | : 5. FENOC will identify two additional shield building locations, which were core bored during this evaluation, for examination. These uncracked locations will be directly adjacent to locations that have been confirmed to be cracked. The two uncracked locations, as designated on FENOC drawing C-111A, are: | ||
: a. in a flute area [F5-777.0-4]; and b. adjacent to a flute shoulder [S2-783.5-4.0]. | : a. in a flute area [F5-777.0-4]; and | ||
: b. adjacent to a flute shoulder [S2-783.5-4.0]. | |||
: 6. FENOC will examine the four core bore locations from Commitment 2 along with the two core bore locations from Commitment 5 with a borescope to verify cracking has not migrated to these core bores located in solid (i.e., uncracked) concrete, during the seventeenth refueling outage currently scheduled to commence in 2012. | : 6. FENOC will examine the four core bore locations from Commitment 2 along with the two core bore locations from Commitment 5 with a borescope to verify cracking has not migrated to these core bores located in solid (i.e., uncracked) concrete, during the seventeenth refueling outage currently scheduled to commence in 2012. | ||
: 7. FENOC will examine the crack interface to identify any changes by examining either existing core bore locations with known cracks, or by performing a core bore in a similar | : 7. FENOC will examine the crack interface to identify any changes by examining either existing core bore locations with known cracks, or by performing a core bore in a similar area: | ||
: a. adjacent to a flute shoulder [S9-666.0-11]; | |||
: b. near the top of the shield building [S9-785-22.5]; and | : b. near the top of the shield building [S9-785-22.5]; and | ||
: c. adjacent to Main Steam Line penetration [core bore from Commitment 4]. | : c. adjacent to Main Steam Line penetration [core bore from Commitment 4]. | ||
Line 49: | Line 45: | ||
: 1) Notify me immediately if your understanding differs from that set forth above; | : 1) Notify me immediately if your understanding differs from that set forth above; | ||
: 2) Notify me if for any reason you cannot complete the actions and commitments within the specified schedule and advise me in writing of your modified schedule in advance of the change; and | : 2) Notify me if for any reason you cannot complete the actions and commitments within the specified schedule and advise me in writing of your modified schedule in advance of the change; and | ||
: 3) Notify me in writing when you have completed the actions and commitments addressed in this Confirmatory Action Letter. | : 3) Notify me in writing when you have completed the actions and commitments addressed in this Confirmatory Action Letter. | ||
Issuance of this Confirmatory Action Letter does not preclude issuance of an Order formalizing the above commitments or requiring other actions on the part of FENOC, nor does it | |||
Issuance of this Confirmatory Action Letter does not preclude issuance of an Order formalizing the above commitments or requiring other actions on the part of FENOC, nor does it | |||
B. Allen preclude the NRC from taking enforcement action for violations of NRC requirements that may have prompted the issuance of this letter. Failure to meet the commitments in this Confirmatory Action Letter may result in an Order if FENOCs performance, as demonstrated by the failure to meet any Confirmatory Action Letter commitments, does not provide reasonable assurance that the NRC can rely on FENOC to meet the NRCs requirements and protect public health and safety or the common defense and security. | |||
You should also be aware that while the NRC staff concluded that FENOC provided reasonable assurance that the shield building remains capable of performing its safety functions, NRC staff continues to evaluate whether the shield building (in its current condition) conforms to the design code requirements identified in the plants licensing basis. | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any), will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), | |||
accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
To the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction. If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. If you request withholding of such material, you must specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withheld and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g., | To the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction. If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. If you request withholding of such material, you must specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withheld and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g., | ||
explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.390(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information). If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. | explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.390(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information). If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. | ||
Sincerely, | |||
Sincerely, | /RA/ | ||
Cynthia D. Pederson Acting Regional Administrator Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 cc: Distribution via ListServ TM | |||
/RA/ | |||
Cynthia D. Pederson | |||
Acting Regional Administrator Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 | |||
cc: Distribution via ListServ TM | |||
B. Allen preclude the NRC from taking enforcement action for violations of NRC requirements that may have prompted the issuance of this letter. Failure to meet the commitments in this Confirmatory Action Letter may result in an Order if FENOCs performance, as demonstrated by the failure to meet any Confirmatory Action Letter commitments, does not provide reasonable assurance that the NRC can rely on FENOC to meet the NRCs requirements and protect public health and safety or the common defense and security. | |||
You should also be aware that while the NRC staff concluded that FENOC provided reasonable assurance that the shield building remains capable of performing its safety functions, NRC staff continues to evaluate whether the shield building (in its current condition) conforms to the design code requirements identified in the plants licensing basis. | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any), will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), | |||
accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
To the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction. If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. If you request withholding of such material, you must specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withheld and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g., | To the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction. If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. If you request withholding of such material, you must specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withheld and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g., | ||
explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.390(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information). If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. | explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.390(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information). If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. | ||
Sincerely, /RA/ Cynthia D. Pederson Acting Regional Administrator Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 cc: Distribution via ListServ TM See Previous Concurrence DOCUMENT NAME: | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ | |||
Cynthia D. Pederson Acting Regional Administrator Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 cc: Distribution via ListServ TM See Previous Concurrence DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRSIII\DRS\Work in Progress\Ltr 120211 Draft Davis-Besse CAL 2011 rev 3.docx Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII NAME DHills:jb*MH for JCameron SOrth SWest DATE 12/01/11 12/01/11 12/01/11 12/02/11 OFFICE RIII NRR/D RIII RIII NAME SReynolds ELeeds PH for CPederson per telecon DATE 12/02/11 12/02/11 12/02/11 | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Letter to B. Allen from C. Pederson dated December 2, 2011. | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER - DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION DISTRIBUTION: | CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER - DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION DISTRIBUTION: | ||
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource Amy Snyder | RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource Amy Snyder RidsNrrPMDavisBesse Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Cynthia Pederson Jennifer Uhle Steven Orth Jared Heck Allan Barker Carole Ariano Linda Linn DRPIII DRSIII Patricia Buckley Tammy Tomczak ROPreports Resource}} | ||
RidsNrrPMDavisBesse Resource | |||
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Cynthia Pederson | |||
Jennifer Uhle Steven Orth Jared Heck | |||
Allan Barker | |||
Carole Ariano Linda Linn DRPIII DRSIII Patricia Buckley Tammy Tomczak ROPreports Resource}} |
Latest revision as of 12:14, 12 November 2019
ML11336A355 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Davis Besse ![]() |
Issue date: | 12/02/2011 |
From: | Pederson C Region 3 Administrator |
To: | Allen B FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
John Rutkowksi | |
References | |
CAL-3-11-001, FOIA/PA-2012-0121 | |
Download: ML11336A355 (5) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 December 2, 2011 CAL No. 3-11-001 Mr. Barry Allen Site Vice President FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station 5501 North State Route 2, Mail Stop A-DB-3080 Oak Harbor, OH 43449-9760
SUBJECT:
CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER - DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION
Dear Mr. Allen:
This letter confirms commitments by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) regarding the identification of cracks in the reinforced concrete shield building at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station. During the recent mid-cycle outage to replace the reactor vessel closure head, which began on October 1, 2011, FENOC discovered laminar cracking in the safety-related shield building of the containment system while performing hydrodemolition operations. Based on an evaluation of FENOCs extent of condition and technical analysis of the Davis-Besse shield building laminar cracking, the NRC staff concluded that FENOC provided reasonable assurance that the shield building is capable of performing its safety functions. In order to provide continued long-term confidence, FENOC has agreed in telephone conversations between you, Steven West, and Steven Reynolds, on November 21, 2011; a followup telephone conversation between you and Jamnes Cameron on November 22, 2011; in a FENOC commitment letter dated November 23, 2011 (ML11329A033); and a telephone conversation between you and Steven Reynolds on December 2, 2011, to the following actions (both completed and planned):
- 1. FENOC will provide the results of the root cause evaluation and corrective actions to the NRC, including any long-term monitoring requirements, by February 28, 2012.
- 2. FENOC will identify four shield building locations, which were core bored during this evaluation, for examination. These uncracked locations will be directly adjacent to locations that have been confirmed to be cracked. The four uncracked locations, as designated on FENOC drawing C-111A, are:
- a. adjacent to a flute shoulder [S9-666.0-12];
- b. in a flute area [F4-1-666.0-3];
- c. adjacent to Main Steam Line penetration 39 [S7-652.0-6.5]; and
- d. adjacent to Main Steam Line penetration 40 [S9-650.0-9].
B. Allen 3. FENOC will examine the four core bore locations from Commitment 2 above with a borescope to verify cracking has not migrated to these core bores located in solid (i.e., uncracked) concrete, within 90 days following plant restart (Mode 2) from the 2011 mid-cycle outage.
- 4. FENOC will examine the crack interface to identify any changes by performing a core bore in a known crack area within the Main Steam Line Room, within 90 days following plant restart (Mode 2) from the October 2011 mid-cycle outage.
- 5. FENOC will identify two additional shield building locations, which were core bored during this evaluation, for examination. These uncracked locations will be directly adjacent to locations that have been confirmed to be cracked. The two uncracked locations, as designated on FENOC drawing C-111A, are:
- a. in a flute area [F5-777.0-4]; and
- b. adjacent to a flute shoulder [S2-783.5-4.0].
- 6. FENOC will examine the four core bore locations from Commitment 2 along with the two core bore locations from Commitment 5 with a borescope to verify cracking has not migrated to these core bores located in solid (i.e., uncracked) concrete, during the seventeenth refueling outage currently scheduled to commence in 2012.
- 7. FENOC will examine the crack interface to identify any changes by examining either existing core bore locations with known cracks, or by performing a core bore in a similar area:
- a. adjacent to a flute shoulder [S9-666.0-11];
- b. near the top of the shield building [S9-785-22.5]; and
- c. adjacent to Main Steam Line penetration [core bore from Commitment 4].
during the seventeenth refueling outage currently scheduled to commence in 2012.
Pursuant to Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S.C. 2232, you are required to:
- 1) Notify me immediately if your understanding differs from that set forth above;
- 2) Notify me if for any reason you cannot complete the actions and commitments within the specified schedule and advise me in writing of your modified schedule in advance of the change; and
- 3) Notify me in writing when you have completed the actions and commitments addressed in this Confirmatory Action Letter.
Issuance of this Confirmatory Action Letter does not preclude issuance of an Order formalizing the above commitments or requiring other actions on the part of FENOC, nor does it
B. Allen preclude the NRC from taking enforcement action for violations of NRC requirements that may have prompted the issuance of this letter. Failure to meet the commitments in this Confirmatory Action Letter may result in an Order if FENOCs performance, as demonstrated by the failure to meet any Confirmatory Action Letter commitments, does not provide reasonable assurance that the NRC can rely on FENOC to meet the NRCs requirements and protect public health and safety or the common defense and security.
You should also be aware that while the NRC staff concluded that FENOC provided reasonable assurance that the shield building remains capable of performing its safety functions, NRC staff continues to evaluate whether the shield building (in its current condition) conforms to the design code requirements identified in the plants licensing basis.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any), will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS),
accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
To the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction. If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. If you request withholding of such material, you must specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withheld and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g.,
explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.390(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information). If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Cynthia D. Pederson Acting Regional Administrator Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 cc: Distribution via ListServ TM
B. Allen preclude the NRC from taking enforcement action for violations of NRC requirements that may have prompted the issuance of this letter. Failure to meet the commitments in this Confirmatory Action Letter may result in an Order if FENOCs performance, as demonstrated by the failure to meet any Confirmatory Action Letter commitments, does not provide reasonable assurance that the NRC can rely on FENOC to meet the NRCs requirements and protect public health and safety or the common defense and security.
You should also be aware that while the NRC staff concluded that FENOC provided reasonable assurance that the shield building remains capable of performing its safety functions, NRC staff continues to evaluate whether the shield building (in its current condition) conforms to the design code requirements identified in the plants licensing basis.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any), will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS),
accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
To the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction. If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. If you request withholding of such material, you must specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withheld and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g.,
explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.390(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information). If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Cynthia D. Pederson Acting Regional Administrator Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 cc: Distribution via ListServ TM See Previous Concurrence DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRSIII\DRS\Work in Progress\Ltr 120211 Draft Davis-Besse CAL 2011 rev 3.docx Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII NAME DHills:jb*MH for JCameron SOrth SWest DATE 12/01/11 12/01/11 12/01/11 12/02/11 OFFICE RIII NRR/D RIII RIII NAME SReynolds ELeeds PH for CPederson per telecon DATE 12/02/11 12/02/11 12/02/11
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Letter to B. Allen from C. Pederson dated December 2, 2011.
SUBJECT:
CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER - DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION DISTRIBUTION:
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource Amy Snyder RidsNrrPMDavisBesse Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Cynthia Pederson Jennifer Uhle Steven Orth Jared Heck Allan Barker Carole Ariano Linda Linn DRPIII DRSIII Patricia Buckley Tammy Tomczak ROPreports Resource