05000263/FIN-2014009-02: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| identified by = NRC | | identified by = NRC | ||
| Inspection procedure = IP 95002 | | Inspection procedure = IP 95002 | ||
| Inspector = B Kemker, G Hansen, J Corujo | | Inspector = B Kemker, G Hansen, J Corujo-Sandin, J Rutkowski, K Riemer, M Ziolkowski, P Voss, R Edwards, P Chaput, W Wang | ||
| CCA = N/A for ROP | | CCA = N/A for ROP | ||
| INPO aspect = | | INPO aspect = | ||
| description = The inspectors identified a Severity Level IV NCV of the NRCs reporting requirements in 10 CFR 50.72(a)(1), Immediate Notification Requirements for Operating Nuclear Power Reactors, and 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Licensee Event Report System. The licensee failed to make a required 8-hour non-emergency notification call to the NRC Operations Center and also failed to submit a required LER within 60 days after discovery in November 2012 of a condition that resulted in the nuclear power plant being in an unanalyzed condition that significantly degraded plant safety, a condition that could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems needed to mitigate the consequences of an accident, and a condition prohibited by the plants TSs. The licensee subsequently made an 8-hour notification call to the NRC Operations Center via the Emergency Notification System to report the event on August 29, 2013 (Event Notice 49314) and subsequently submitted LER 05000263/201300700, Unanalyzed Condition Due to Inadequate Flooding Procedures, on October 28, 2013. Consistent with the guidance in IMC 0612, Power Reactor Inspection Reports, Appendix B, Issue Screening, dated September 7, 2012, the inspectors determined the performance deficiency was not of more than minor significance based on No answers to the more-than-minor screening questions. In accordance with Section 6.9.d.9 of the NRC Enforcement Policy, this violation was categorized as Severity Level IV because the licensee failed to report as required by 10 CFR 50.72(a)(1)(ii) and 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1). No cross-cutting aspect is associated with this traditional enforcement violation because the associated performance deficiency was determined to be of minor significance and therefore not a finding. | | description = The inspectors identified a Severity Level IV NCV of the NRCs reporting requirements in 10 CFR 50.72(a)(1), Immediate Notification Requirements for Operating Nuclear Power Reactors, and 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Licensee Event Report System. The licensee failed to make a required 8-hour non-emergency notification call to the NRC Operations Center and also failed to submit a required LER within 60 days after discovery in November 2012 of a condition that resulted in the nuclear power plant being in an unanalyzed condition that significantly degraded plant safety, a condition that could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems needed to mitigate the consequences of an accident, and a condition prohibited by the plants TSs. The licensee subsequently made an 8-hour notification call to the NRC Operations Center via the Emergency Notification System to report the event on August 29, 2013 (Event Notice 49314) and subsequently submitted LER 05000263/201300700, Unanalyzed Condition Due to Inadequate Flooding Procedures, on October 28, 2013. Consistent with the guidance in IMC 0612, Power Reactor Inspection Reports, Appendix B, Issue Screening, dated September 7, 2012, the inspectors determined the performance deficiency was not of more than minor significance based on No answers to the more-than-minor screening questions. In accordance with Section 6.9.d.9 of the NRC Enforcement Policy, this violation was categorized as Severity Level IV because the licensee failed to report as required by 10 CFR 50.72(a)(1)(ii) and 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1). No cross-cutting aspect is associated with this traditional enforcement violation because the associated performance deficiency was determined to be of minor significance and therefore not a finding. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:52, 20 February 2018
| Site: | Monticello  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000263/2014009 Section 4OA4 |
| Date counted | Dec 31, 2014 (2014Q4) |
| Type: | TEV: Severity level IV |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 95002 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | B Kemker G Hansen J Corujo-Sandin J Rutkowski K Riemer M Ziolkowski P Voss R Edwards P Chaput W Wang |
| Violation of: | 10 CFR 50.72(a)(1)(ii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Submit an LER, Invalid Actuation |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |