ML112500380: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review Result | Acceptance Review Result Susan, When you get a chance, could you please include this email in ADAMS? | ||
Thanks | Thanks | ||
Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
By letter dated July 20, 2011, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) submitted "License Amendment Request, Technical Specification Change Regarding Steam Generator Tube Integrity," for Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3). | By letter dated July 20, 2011, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) submitted "License Amendment Request, Technical Specification Change Regarding Steam Generator Tube Integrity," for Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3). | ||
Entergy will be replacing the two Waterford 3 steam generators (SGs) during the | Entergy will be replacing the two Waterford 3 steam generators (SGs) during the 18 th refueling outage which commences in the fall of 2012. The existing Waterford 3 SG Program under TS 6.5.9 contains an alternate repair criterion f or SG tube inspections that is no longer applicable to the replacement SGs. Additionally, the replacement SGs will contain improved Alloy 690 thermally treated (TT) tubing material. Therefore, the SG tubing inservice inspection frequencies may be extended beyond that currently allowed by the Waterford TSs. | ||
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | ||
Line 49: | Line 51: | ||
If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned, at (301) 415-1480. | If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned, at (301) 415-1480. | ||
N. Kalyanam Project Manager ANO-1and 2 & Waterford 3 DORL/NRR/NRC Email: kaly.kalyanam@nrc.gov | N. Kalyanam Project Manager ANO-1and 2 & Waterford 3 DORL/NRR/NRC Email: kaly.kalyanam@nrc.gov}} | ||
}} |
Revision as of 08:09, 3 August 2018
ML112500380 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Waterford ![]() |
Issue date: | 09/07/2011 |
From: | Kalyanam N K Plant Licensing Branch IV |
To: | Steelman W J Entergy Operations |
Kalyanam N, NRR/DORL/LPL4, 415-1480 | |
References | |
TAC ME6852 | |
Download: ML112500380 (2) | |
Text
From: Kalyanam, Kaly Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:06 PM To: STEELMAN, WILLIAM J Cc: Lent, Susan; Burkhardt, Janet
Subject:
Acceptance Review Result Susan, When you get a chance, could you please include this email in ADAMS?
Thanks
Kaly
The SUNSI information as follows:
Subject:
License Amendment Request Technical Specification Change Regarding Steam Generator Tube Integrity Plant: Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 Docket No.: 50/382
Subject:
TAC Nos.: ME6852 SUNSI Review Done: Yes. Publicly Available, Normal Release, Non-sensitive, From: N. Kalyanam To: W. Steelman
Subject:
Acceptance Review Result for License Amendment Request, dated July 20, 2011.
Mr. Steelman:
By letter dated July 20, 2011, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) submitted "License Amendment Request, Technical Specification Change Regarding Steam Generator Tube Integrity," for Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3).
Entergy will be replacing the two Waterford 3 steam generators (SGs) during the 18 th refueling outage which commences in the fall of 2012. The existing Waterford 3 SG Program under TS 6.5.9 contains an alternate repair criterion f or SG tube inspections that is no longer applicable to the replacement SGs. Additionally, the replacement SGs will contain improved Alloy 690 thermally treated (TT) tubing material. Therefore, the SG tubing inservice inspection frequencies may be extended beyond that currently allowed by the Waterford TSs.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned, at (301) 415-1480.
N. Kalyanam Project Manager ANO-1and 2 & Waterford 3 DORL/NRR/NRC Email: kaly.kalyanam@nrc.gov