IR 05000391/2011612: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
==Dear Mr. Skaggs:== | ==Dear Mr. Skaggs:== | ||
On November 18, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a team inspection of construction activities at your Watts Bar Unit 2 reactor facility. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on November 18, 2011, with Mr. David Stinson and other members of your staff | On November 18, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a team inspection of construction activities at your Watts Bar Unit 2 reactor facility. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on November 18, 2011, with Mr. David Stinson and other members of your staff. | ||
The NRC team performed an Electrical Distribution System Functional Inspection (EDSFI) using selected portions of NRC Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/107. This inspection examined activities conducted under your Unit 2 construction permit as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations, with the conditions of your construction permit, and with fulfillment of Unit 2 regulatory framework commitments. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. | |||
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings or violations of significance were identified. | |||
TVA 2 In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | TVA 2 In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | ||
Line 41: | Line 39: | ||
Inspection Report 05000391/2011612 w/attachment cc w/encl: (See page 3) | Inspection Report 05000391/2011612 w/attachment cc w/encl: (See page 3) | ||
___ML11348A081_____________ | |||
# SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE | |||
# FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DCI RII:DCI RII:DCI RII:DCI RII:DCP RII:DCP SIGNATURE RXM3 GWM1 viaemail GXC2 CAJ via email CJE RCH NAME R. Mathis G Morris G Crespo C Julian C Even R Haag DATE 12/8/2011 12/8/2011 12/8/2011 12/14/2011 12/12/2011 12/14/2011 12/ /2011 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO TVA 3 cc w/encl: | |||
Mr. Gordon P. Arent, Manager WBN Unit 2 Licensing Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Spring City, Tennessee 37381 Mr. David Stinson Vice President WBN Unit Two WBN Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Spring City, Tennessee 37381 Ms. Donna Guinn, Manager Licensing and Industry Affairs WBN Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Spring City, Tennessee 37381 | |||
Mr. Preston D. Swafford Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 3R Lookout Place 1101 Market Place Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801 County Executive 375 Church Street Suite 215 Dayton, Tennessee 37321 Mr. Dave Gronek Plant Manager, WBN Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Spring City, Tennessee 37381 Mr. T. J. Neissen General Manager Quality Assurance Nuclear Generation and Development and Construction 1101 Market Street Blue Ridge 3A Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801 | |||
Mr. Joseph Shea Acting Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority LP 4B 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 | |||
SUBJECT: WBN NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 CONSTRUCTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000391/2011612 Distribution w/encl: L. Raghavan, NRR S. Campbell, NRR P. Milano, NRR C. Evans, RII R. Haag, RII T. Nazario, RII WBN Unit 2 SRI L. Douglas, RII EICS S. Schaffer, RII DRP R. Monk, RII WBN Unit 1 SRI OE Mail (email address if applicable) PUBLIC Enclosure NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II Docket No.: 50-391 Construction Permit No.: CPPR-92 Report No.: 05000391/2011612 Applicant: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Facility: Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Location: 1260 Nuclear Plant Rd Spring City TN 37381 Dates: October 24 - November 18, 2011 Inspectors: Caudle Julian, Team Leader, Construction Inspection Branch 1 (CIB 1), Division of Construction Inspection (DCI) Region II (RII) G. Crespo, Senior Construction Inspector, CIB1, DCI, RII R. Mathis, Construction Inspector, CIB1, DCI, RII C. Even, Project Inspector, Construction Projects Branch 3 (CPB 3), Division of Construction Projects (DCP), RII G. Morris, Consultant | Mr. E. J. Vigluicci Assistant General Counsel Tennessee Valley Authority 6A West Tower 400 West Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, Tennessee 37402 Mr. Lawrence E. Nanney, Director Tennessee Department of Environmental Health & Conservation Division of Radiological Health 3rd Floor, L&C Annex 401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243-1532 Mr. D. E. Grissette Site Vice President WBN Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Spring City, Tennessee 37381 | ||
County Mayor P.O. Box 156 Decatur, Tennessee 37322 | |||
Ms. Ann P. Harris Public 341 Swing Loop Rockwood, TN 37854 | |||
cc email distribution w/encl: | |||
Greg Scott Tennessee Valley Authority Electronic Mail Distribution Watts Bar 2 Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority Electronic Mail Distribution | |||
TVA 4 Letter to Michael from Mark S. Lesser dated December 14, 2011 | |||
SUBJECT: WBN NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 CONSTRUCTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000391/2011612 Distribution w/encl | |||
: L. Raghavan, NRR S. Campbell, NRR P. Milano, NRR C. Evans, RII R. Haag, RII T. Nazario, RII WBN Unit 2 SRI L. Douglas, RII EICS S. Schaffer, RII DRP R. Monk, RII WBN Unit 1 SRI OE Mail (email address if applicable) PUBLIC Enclosure NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II Docket No.: 50-391 | |||
Construction Permit No.: CPPR-92 Report No.: 05000391/2011612 | |||
Applicant: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) | |||
Facility: Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Location: 1260 Nuclear Plant Rd Spring City TN 37381 Dates: October 24 - November 18, 2011 | |||
Inspectors: | |||
Caudle Julian, Team Leader, Construction Inspection Branch 1 (CIB 1), Division of Construction Inspection (DCI) Region II (RII) G. Crespo, Senior Construction Inspector, CIB1, DCI, RII R. Mathis, Construction Inspector, CIB1, DCI, RII C. Even, Project Inspector, Construction Projects Branch 3 (CPB 3), Division of Construction Projects (DCP), RII G. Morris, Consultant | |||
Approved by: Mark S. Lesser, Chief Construction Inspection Branch 1 Division of Construction Inspection | Approved by: Mark S. Lesser, Chief Construction Inspection Branch 1 Division of Construction Inspection | ||
=EXECUTIVE SUMMARY= | =EXECUTIVE SUMMARY= | ||
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 | Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 | ||
This inspection included aspects of engineering activities performed by TVA associated with the Watts Bar Nuclear (WBN) Plant Unit 2 construction project. This report covered a two week period of inspection in the area of Electrical Distribution System Functional Inspection (EDSFI) as specified in NRC Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/107. The inspection program for Unit 2 construction activities is described in NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2517. Information regarding the WBN Unit 2 Construction Project and NRC inspections can be found at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/plant-specific-items/watts-bar.html. Inspection Results The inspectors assessed the capability of the Electrical Distribution System (EDS) to perform its intended safety function during plant operating and accident conditions. The inspectors reviewed electrical calculations and analyses associated with cable ampacity, voltage analysis, load flow, transformer sizing, circuit protection & coordination, vital battery system, and emergency diesel generator loading. The inspectors interviewed responsible engineering staff to confirm understanding of records. The inspectors determined that in general the calculations were complete, understandable, and technically adequate. | |||
No violations of regulatory requirements were identified. | |||
=REPORT DETAILS= | =REPORT DETAILS= | ||
II. Management Oversight and Control | |||
II. Management Oversight and Control E.1 Engineering Activities E.1.1 (Closed) EDSFI Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/107 | |||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Background: In 1979, the NRC published Generic Letter (GL) 79-36 to ask licensees to examine undervoltage protection of safety related electric equipment for potential damage as a result of sustained degraded voltage from the offsite electric grid system. This generic letter was issued in response to events at a number of operating nuclear plants that brought into question the conformance of the station electric distribution system to 10 CFR 50, Appendix A - General Design Criteria - 17, Electric Power Systems. TI 2515/107 - EDSFI was issued on October 19, 1990 to provide a comprehensive NRC team inspection focused primarily on the EDS at operating nuclear plants to address the concerns raised by the Safety System Functional Inspections performed between 1986-1990 and Generic Letter 79-36. This inspection performed a portion of TI 2515/107 at Watts Bar 2. Using the guidance of TI 2515/107, the inspectors examined the electrical distribution system with focus on the path supplying Shutdown Board 2B-B. The inspectors reviewed available design basis information and conducted plant walk-downs as necessary to assess the capacity of the electrical distribution system to perform its safety functions. | Background: In 1979, the NRC published Generic Letter (GL) 79-36 to ask licensees to examine undervoltage protection of safety related electric equipment for potential damage as a result of sustained degraded voltage from the offsite electric grid system. This generic letter was issued in response to events at a number of operating nuclear plants that brought into question the conformance of the station electric distribution system to 10 CFR 50, Appendix A - General Design Criteria - 17, Electric Power Systems. TI 2515/107 - EDSFI was issued on October 19, 1990 to provide a comprehensive NRC team inspection focused primarily on the EDS at operating nuclear plants to address the concerns raised by the Safety System Functional Inspections performed between 1986-1990 and Generic Letter 79-36. This inspection performed a portion of TI 2515/107 at Watts Bar 2. | ||
Using the guidance of TI 2515/107, the inspectors examined the electrical distribution system with focus on the path supplying Shutdown Board 2B-B. The inspectors reviewed available design basis information and conducted plant walk-downs as necessary to assess the capacity of the electrical distribution system to perform its safety functions. | |||
The inspectors assessed the capability of the EDS to perform its intended safety function during plant operating and accident conditions and reviewed design basis calculations for the EDS to evaluate whether they were coherent, accurate, and complete for supporting dual unit operation. The inspectors reviewed the calculations documenting the loading on various electrical sources such as emergency diesel generators, batteries, and shutdown boards. Specifically the inspectors performed detailed review of 11 electrical calculations focusing on cable ampacity, voltage analysis, load flow, transformer sizing, circuit protection & coordination, vital battery system, and diesel generator loading. The complete list of electrical calculations reviewed is included in the supplemental information at the end of this report. The inspectors also reviewed Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) descriptions, design specifications, drawings, system descriptions, and other design documents to support the assessment of the EDS design. The inspectors reviewed selected referenced supporting calculations to confirm selected design inputs and assumptions. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, performed field walk-downs, and observed software analysis. The supplemental information attachment also includes a list of the documents reviewed in support of the inspection. | |||
The inspection team reviewed the design inputs used in TVA's Electrical Transient Analyzer Program (ETAP) from the emergency diesel generators (EDGs) loading calculation to verify that the ETAP program matched the assumptions and conclusions of the calculation in dealing with the time zero loads in the EDG loading sequence. The inspection team's review of the EDG design calculation focused on the loads that are started at time zero in the loading sequence to verify that all design loads were appropriately captured and analyzed in ETAP. The inspectors took a sample of the time zero components and performed walk-downs of those components to gather nameplate data to verify that the components modeled in ETAP were the same as the components in the plant. | |||
The inspectors interviewed responsible engineering staff to address questions generated from the review of the engineering documentation. The inspectors also reviewed surveillance and test procedures for the 125V DC vital power system and the 125V DC diesel generator system. | The inspectors interviewed responsible engineering staff to address questions generated from the review of the engineering documentation. The inspectors also reviewed surveillance and test procedures for the 125V DC vital power system and the 125V DC diesel generator system. | ||
Line 82: | Line 114: | ||
====b. Observations and Findings==== | ====b. Observations and Findings==== | ||
TVA's method of resolving the CDR was to establish a list which identifies a minimum set of Electrical and Instrumentation and Control (I&C) calculations necessary to fully document the design basis of a TVA nuclear plant. The list was first issued as a memo for electrical branch direction on July 17, 1987, and contained essential and desirable calculations. The content of that list was subsequently issued as Appendix E, Electrical/I&C Engineering Calculation Classifications of TVA NPG Standard Department Procedure NEDP-2, Design Calculation Process Control, Revision 15. TVA calculations are now organized and controlled by the Calculation Cross Reference Information System (CCRIS) computer system. The inspectors examined an index of calculations from CCRIS and found that most of the topics listed in Appendix E had corresponding calculations issued. However the inspectors could not find calculations listed for all of the topics under the headings of Raceway System Calculations or Instrumentation and Control System Calculations. TVA representatives stated that they needed to do more work on this item before it is ready for NRC review and closure and they initiated PER 458200 to track corrective action on this item. No findings of significance were identified | TVA's method of resolving the CDR was to establish a list which identifies a minimum set of Electrical and Instrumentation and Control (I&C) calculations necessary to fully document the design basis of a TVA nuclear plant. The list was first issued as a memo for electrical branch direction on July 17, 1987, and contained essential and desirable calculations. The content of that list was subsequently issued as Appendix E, Electrical/I&C Engineering Calculation Classifications of TVA NPG Standard Department Procedure NEDP-2, Design Calculation Process Control, Revision 15. TVA calculations are now organized and controlled by the Calculation Cross Reference Information System (CCRIS) computer system. The inspectors examined an index of calculations from CCRIS and found that most of the topics listed in Appendix E had corresponding calculations issued. However the inspectors could not find calculations listed for all of the topics under the headings of Raceway System Calculations or Instrumentation and Control System Calculations. TVA representatives stated that they needed to do more work on this item before it is ready for NRC review and closure and they initiated PER 458200 to track corrective action on this item. No findings of significance were identified. | ||
Additional NRC inspection is required to close this item when TVA work is complete. OA.1.2 (Closed) Unresolved Item 05000391/2011606-01, Ninth Example, Electrical Design Issues Requiring Additional Review | c. Conclusion TVA representatives concluded that this item requires more work before it is ready for NRC review and closure and they initiated PER 458200 to track corrective actions. | ||
Additional NRC inspection is required to close this item when TVA work is complete. | |||
OA.1.2 (Closed) Unresolved Item 05000391/2011606-01, Ninth Example, Electrical Design Issues Requiring Additional Review | |||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Line 93: | Line 129: | ||
====b. Observations and Findings==== | ====b. Observations and Findings==== | ||
No findings of significance were identified | No findings of significance were identified The inspectors determined that the essential information was included and the calculation was technically acceptable. | ||
The inspectors concluded that the failure to include information in previous revisions was a minor violation. | The inspectors concluded that the failure to include information in previous revisions was a minor violation. | ||
Line 99: | Line 135: | ||
c. Conclusion The ninth example of this unresolved item is closed. | c. Conclusion The ninth example of this unresolved item is closed. | ||
V. Management Meetings | V. Management Meetings X.1 | ||
=====Exit Meeting Summary===== | =====Exit Meeting Summary===== | ||
Line 105: | Line 141: | ||
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | =SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | ||
Partial List of Persons Contacted | |||
Partial List of Persons Contacted | |||
Applicant personnel | |||
: [[contact::A. Bangalore]], Electrical Design Manager, Bechtel | : [[contact::A. Bangalore]], Electrical Design Manager, Bechtel | ||
: [[contact::D. Beckley]], Electrical Design Engineer, TVA Unit 2 | : [[contact::D. Beckley]], Electrical Design Engineer, TVA Unit 2 | ||
Line 113: | Line 151: | ||
: [[contact::I. Khan]], Electrical Engineer, Washington Group | : [[contact::I. Khan]], Electrical Engineer, Washington Group | ||
: [[contact::G. Scott]], Licensing, TVA | : [[contact::G. Scott]], Licensing, TVA | ||
: [[contact::D. Stinson]], Vice President, TVA Unit 2 | : [[contact::D. Stinson]], Vice President, TVA Unit 2 | ||
conditions. (Section E.1.1) | Inspection Procedure Used | ||
design basis (Section OA.1.1) | TI 2515/107, Electrical Distribution System Functional Inspection (EDSFI) | ||
List of Items Opened, Closed, and Discussed | |||
Closed 2515/107 TI EDSFI - Assess the capacity of the EDS to perform its intended functions during all plant operating and accident | |||
conditions. (Section E.1.1) | |||
2011606-01 (Example #9) | |||
URI Diesel Generator Loading Analysis - Electrical Design Issues (Section OA.1.2) | |||
Discussed 86-13 CDR Inadequate calculations to document electrical system | |||
design basis (Section OA.1.1) | |||
Open Item 7 | |||
SSER-22 (App. HH) | |||
Inadequate calculations to document electrical system design basis (Section OA.1.1) | |||
List of Documents Reviewed | List of Documents Reviewed | ||
Problem Evaluation Reports Generated During This Inspection | Problem Evaluation Reports Generated During This Inspection | ||
PER 464992, NRC identified errors contained in Unit 2 protection and coordination calculations | PER 458200, NRC identified that not all calculations listed in NEDP-2, Appendix E can be found in CCRIS PER 462617, NRC identified discrepancies in calculation EDQ00299920080016, Rev. 5 PER 464997, NRC identified unanalyzed load in calculation EDQ00099920080014, Rev. 14 PER 463429, NRC identified "Calculation of Record" contradiction in calculation EDQ00023620070003, Rev. 12 PER 463512, NRC identified incorrect test result value in 1-EI-82-40A | ||
PER 464992, NRC identified errors contained in Unit 2 protection and coordination calculations | |||
Calculations | |||
EDQ00299920080016, 6.9 kV Protection and Coordination Calculation, Rev. 5 EDQ00299920080004, 480V Class 1E Protection, Coordination and Thermal Overload Heater Calculation - Unit 2, Rev. 12 EDQ00023620070003, 125V DC Vital Battery System Analysis, Rev. 12 | |||
EDQ00223620080011, 125V DC Vital Power Control Voltage Analysis - Unit 2, Rev. 6 EDQ00299920080003, Class 1E MCC Control Circuit Voltage Analysis and Transformer Sizing, Rev. 4 EDQ00299920080010, 120VAC Vital Power Load Flow and Voltage Drop Analysis, Rev. 9 EDQ00099920080014, Diesel Generator Loading, Rev. 14 | EDQ00223620080011, 125V DC Vital Power Control Voltage Analysis - Unit 2, Rev. 6 EDQ00299920080003, Class 1E MCC Control Circuit Voltage Analysis and Transformer Sizing, Rev. 4 EDQ00299920080010, 120VAC Vital Power Load Flow and Voltage Drop Analysis, Rev. 9 EDQ00099920080014, Diesel Generator Loading, Rev. 14 | ||
EDQ00099920070002, AC Auxiliary Power System Analysis, Rev. 21 EDQ00299920080006, Unit 2 Class 1E V3 Cable Ampacity, Rev. 11 EDQ00299920080002, Unit 2 Class 1E V4 Cable Ampacity, Rev. 17 EDQ00299920080001, Unit 2 V5 Cable Ampacity, Rev. 6 WBNEEBMSTI070018, 120 VAC Short Circuit Coordination Study and Protection to examine the coordination and protection of 120 volt safety related circuits, Rev. 81 WBNEEBMSTI070005, Identifies time-current curves for battery boards I-IV on sheets 84, 85 and 86 or TCC-10, 11, & 12, Rev. 49 | EDQ00099920070002, AC Auxiliary Power System Analysis, Rev. 21 EDQ00299920080006, Unit 2 Class 1E V3 Cable Ampacity, Rev. 11 EDQ00299920080002, Unit 2 Class 1E V4 Cable Ampacity, Rev. 17 EDQ00299920080001, Unit 2 V5 Cable Ampacity, Rev. 6 WBNEEBMSTI070018, 120 VAC Short Circuit Coordination Study and Protection to examine the coordination and protection of 120 volt safety related circuits, Rev. 81 WBNEEBMSTI070005, Identifies time-current curves for battery boards I-IV on sheets 84, 85 and 86 or TCC-10, 11, & 12, Rev. 49 | ||
45B2766-2E Rev. 5, FCR Number 55769-A page 104 / EDCR Number 53287-A page 141 45B2766-17F Rev. 3, FCR Number 55769-A page 147 / EDCR Number 53287-A page 188 | Technical Manuals | ||
GE Relay Instruction Manual GEK-34053G Time Overcurrent Relays IAC51. | |||
Drawings 1-45W760-68-3, R12 - Unit 1, Wiring Diagram, Reactor Coolant System, Schematic Diagrams 1-45W724-4, R21 - Units 1 & 2, Wiring Diagrams, 6900V Shutdown Board 2B-B, Single Line | |||
45B2766-2E Rev. 5, FCR Number 55769-A page 104 / EDCR Number 53287-A page 141 45B2766-17F Rev. 3, FCR Number 55769-A page 147 / EDCR Number 53287-A page 188 | |||
Miscellaneous | |||
Electrical Design Guide DG-E7.1.2 Rev. 0 Titled: Protective Relay System Design for AC Auxiliary Power System, Section 2.1.3.1 Induction Motors Surveillance Procedure 0-SI-82-3, Rev. 0048 WBN Unit 0, 18 Month Loss of Offsite Power With Safety Injection - DG 1A-A, Section 6.2 ESF Actuation - Offsite Power Available DNE Calculation E31850221300, Rev. 4 - 6.9 kV Shutdown Board Normal and Alternate Feeders with EBASCO recommendation letter of February 6, 1992 EB-ALS-92-021; Subject: Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 6.9 kV Board Feeder Relay Settings (DCN M-12051) EDCR 53287 associated with the replacement of obsolete and replacement circuit breakers type ITE model EF3 and FJ3. | |||
EDCR 54172 for the resolution of a number of motor protection settings and cable sizes EDCR 55229 for the replacement of a number of motor feeders that had been undersized EDCR 53287, Rev. A Section 6.1.7 Obsolete and Replacement Circuit Breakers PEG Package No. 2008-94001, Inverter Specification 0-MI-235.002, 120 V AC Vital Inverter Automatic Transfer Test DS-E12.6.3, Auxiliary and Control Power Cable Sizing, Up to 15,000 Volts, Rev.10 | EDCR 54172 for the resolution of a number of motor protection settings and cable sizes EDCR 55229 for the replacement of a number of motor feeders that had been undersized EDCR 53287, Rev. A Section 6.1.7 Obsolete and Replacement Circuit Breakers PEG Package No. 2008-94001, Inverter Specification 0-MI-235.002, 120 V AC Vital Inverter Automatic Transfer Test DS-E12.6.3, Auxiliary and Control Power Cable Sizing, Up to 15,000 Volts, Rev.10 | ||
Integrated Cable and Raceway Design System (ICRDS) Software Requirements Specification, Rev. 5 WB-DC-30-28 titled: Low and Medium Voltage Power Systems, Section 2.10 Protection WBN-EEB-ED-Q000-999-2007-0002, Power System Analysis, Rev. 0 NEDP-2, Design Calculation Process Control, Rev. 15 | Integrated Cable and Raceway Design System (ICRDS) Software Requirements Specification, Rev. 5 WB-DC-30-28 titled: Low and Medium Voltage Power Systems, Section 2.10 Protection WBN-EEB-ED-Q000-999-2007-0002, Power System Analysis, Rev. 0 NEDP-2, Design Calculation Process Control, Rev. 15 | ||
WBRD-50-391/86-13, Lack of Adequate Calculations to Document Electrical System Design Basis List of Acronyms | WBRD-50-391/86-13, Lack of Adequate Calculations to Document Electrical System Design | ||
Basis List of Acronyms | |||
CCRIS Calculation Cross-Reference Information System CDBI Component Design Basis Inspection | |||
CDR Construction Deficiency Report CFR Code of Federal Regulations DC Direct Current DCN Design Change Notice EDCR Engineering Document Construction Release | CDR Construction Deficiency Report CFR Code of Federal Regulations DC Direct Current DCN Design Change Notice EDCR Engineering Document Construction Release | ||
EDG Emergency Diesel Generator EDS Electrical Distribution System EDSFI Electrical Distribution System Functional Inspection ETAP Electrical Transient Analyzer Program FSAR Final Safety Analysis Report | EDG Emergency Diesel Generator EDS Electrical Distribution System EDSFI Electrical Distribution System Functional Inspection ETAP Electrical Transient Analyzer Program FSAR Final Safety Analysis Report |
Revision as of 08:15, 31 July 2018
ML11348A081 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Watts Bar ![]() |
Issue date: | 12/14/2011 |
From: | Lesser M S NRC/RGN-II/DCI/CIB1 |
To: | Skaggs M D Tennessee Valley Authority |
References | |
IR-11-612 | |
Download: ML11348A081 (14) | |
Text
December 14, 2011
Mr. Michael Senior Vice President Nuclear Generation Development and Construction Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
SUBJECT: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 CONSTRUCTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000391/2011612
Dear Mr. Skaggs:
On November 18, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a team inspection of construction activities at your Watts Bar Unit 2 reactor facility. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on November 18, 2011, with Mr. David Stinson and other members of your staff.
The NRC team performed an Electrical Distribution System Functional Inspection (EDSFI) using selected portions of NRC Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/107. This inspection examined activities conducted under your Unit 2 construction permit as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations, with the conditions of your construction permit, and with fulfillment of Unit 2 regulatory framework commitments. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings or violations of significance were identified.
TVA 2 In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,/RA/ Mark S. Lesser, Chief Construction Inspection Branch 1 Division of Construction Inspection Docket No. 50-391 Construction Permit No: CPPR-92
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000391/2011612 w/attachment cc w/encl: (See page 3)
___ML11348A081_____________
- SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE
- FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DCI RII:DCI RII:DCI RII:DCI RII:DCP RII:DCP SIGNATURE RXM3 GWM1 viaemail GXC2 CAJ via email CJE RCH NAME R. Mathis G Morris G Crespo C Julian C Even R Haag DATE 12/8/2011 12/8/2011 12/8/2011 12/14/2011 12/12/2011 12/14/2011 12/ /2011 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO TVA 3 cc w/encl:
Mr. Gordon P. Arent, Manager WBN Unit 2 Licensing Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Spring City, Tennessee 37381 Mr. David Stinson Vice President WBN Unit Two WBN Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Spring City, Tennessee 37381 Ms. Donna Guinn, Manager Licensing and Industry Affairs WBN Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Spring City, Tennessee 37381
Mr. Preston D. Swafford Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 3R Lookout Place 1101 Market Place Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801 County Executive 375 Church Street Suite 215 Dayton, Tennessee 37321 Mr. Dave Gronek Plant Manager, WBN Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Spring City, Tennessee 37381 Mr. T. J. Neissen General Manager Quality Assurance Nuclear Generation and Development and Construction 1101 Market Street Blue Ridge 3A Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801
Mr. Joseph Shea Acting Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority LP 4B 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
Mr. E. J. Vigluicci Assistant General Counsel Tennessee Valley Authority 6A West Tower 400 West Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, Tennessee 37402 Mr. Lawrence E. Nanney, Director Tennessee Department of Environmental Health & Conservation Division of Radiological Health 3rd Floor, L&C Annex 401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243-1532 Mr. D. E. Grissette Site Vice President WBN Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Spring City, Tennessee 37381
County Mayor P.O. Box 156 Decatur, Tennessee 37322
Ms. Ann P. Harris Public 341 Swing Loop Rockwood, TN 37854
cc email distribution w/encl:
Greg Scott Tennessee Valley Authority Electronic Mail Distribution Watts Bar 2 Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority Electronic Mail Distribution
TVA 4 Letter to Michael from Mark S. Lesser dated December 14, 2011
SUBJECT: WBN NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 CONSTRUCTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000391/2011612 Distribution w/encl
- L. Raghavan, NRR S. Campbell, NRR P. Milano, NRR C. Evans, RII R. Haag, RII T. Nazario, RII WBN Unit 2 SRI L. Douglas, RII EICS S. Schaffer, RII DRP R. Monk, RII WBN Unit 1 SRI OE Mail (email address if applicable) PUBLIC Enclosure NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II Docket No.: 50-391
Construction Permit No.: CPPR-92 Report No.: 05000391/2011612
Applicant: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)
Facility: Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Location: 1260 Nuclear Plant Rd Spring City TN 37381 Dates: October 24 - November 18, 2011
Inspectors:
Caudle Julian, Team Leader, Construction Inspection Branch 1 (CIB 1), Division of Construction Inspection (DCI) Region II (RII) G. Crespo, Senior Construction Inspector, CIB1, DCI, RII R. Mathis, Construction Inspector, CIB1, DCI, RII C. Even, Project Inspector, Construction Projects Branch 3 (CPB 3), Division of Construction Projects (DCP), RII G. Morris, Consultant
Approved by: Mark S. Lesser, Chief Construction Inspection Branch 1 Division of Construction Inspection
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2
This inspection included aspects of engineering activities performed by TVA associated with the Watts Bar Nuclear (WBN) Plant Unit 2 construction project. This report covered a two week period of inspection in the area of Electrical Distribution System Functional Inspection (EDSFI) as specified in NRC Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/107. The inspection program for Unit 2 construction activities is described in NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2517. Information regarding the WBN Unit 2 Construction Project and NRC inspections can be found at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/plant-specific-items/watts-bar.html. Inspection Results The inspectors assessed the capability of the Electrical Distribution System (EDS) to perform its intended safety function during plant operating and accident conditions. The inspectors reviewed electrical calculations and analyses associated with cable ampacity, voltage analysis, load flow, transformer sizing, circuit protection & coordination, vital battery system, and emergency diesel generator loading. The inspectors interviewed responsible engineering staff to confirm understanding of records. The inspectors determined that in general the calculations were complete, understandable, and technically adequate.
No violations of regulatory requirements were identified.
REPORT DETAILS
II. Management Oversight and Control E.1 Engineering Activities E.1.1 (Closed) EDSFI Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/107
a. Inspection Scope
Background: In 1979, the NRC published Generic Letter (GL) 79-36 to ask licensees to examine undervoltage protection of safety related electric equipment for potential damage as a result of sustained degraded voltage from the offsite electric grid system. This generic letter was issued in response to events at a number of operating nuclear plants that brought into question the conformance of the station electric distribution system to 10 CFR 50, Appendix A - General Design Criteria - 17, Electric Power Systems. TI 2515/107 - EDSFI was issued on October 19, 1990 to provide a comprehensive NRC team inspection focused primarily on the EDS at operating nuclear plants to address the concerns raised by the Safety System Functional Inspections performed between 1986-1990 and Generic Letter 79-36. This inspection performed a portion of TI 2515/107 at Watts Bar 2.
Using the guidance of TI 2515/107, the inspectors examined the electrical distribution system with focus on the path supplying Shutdown Board 2B-B. The inspectors reviewed available design basis information and conducted plant walk-downs as necessary to assess the capacity of the electrical distribution system to perform its safety functions.
The inspectors assessed the capability of the EDS to perform its intended safety function during plant operating and accident conditions and reviewed design basis calculations for the EDS to evaluate whether they were coherent, accurate, and complete for supporting dual unit operation. The inspectors reviewed the calculations documenting the loading on various electrical sources such as emergency diesel generators, batteries, and shutdown boards. Specifically the inspectors performed detailed review of 11 electrical calculations focusing on cable ampacity, voltage analysis, load flow, transformer sizing, circuit protection & coordination, vital battery system, and diesel generator loading. The complete list of electrical calculations reviewed is included in the supplemental information at the end of this report. The inspectors also reviewed Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) descriptions, design specifications, drawings, system descriptions, and other design documents to support the assessment of the EDS design. The inspectors reviewed selected referenced supporting calculations to confirm selected design inputs and assumptions. The inspectors interviewed responsible personnel, performed field walk-downs, and observed software analysis. The supplemental information attachment also includes a list of the documents reviewed in support of the inspection.
The inspection team reviewed the design inputs used in TVA's Electrical Transient Analyzer Program (ETAP) from the emergency diesel generators (EDGs) loading calculation to verify that the ETAP program matched the assumptions and conclusions of the calculation in dealing with the time zero loads in the EDG loading sequence. The inspection team's review of the EDG design calculation focused on the loads that are started at time zero in the loading sequence to verify that all design loads were appropriately captured and analyzed in ETAP. The inspectors took a sample of the time zero components and performed walk-downs of those components to gather nameplate data to verify that the components modeled in ETAP were the same as the components in the plant.
The inspectors interviewed responsible engineering staff to address questions generated from the review of the engineering documentation. The inspectors also reviewed surveillance and test procedures for the 125V DC vital power system and the 125V DC diesel generator system.
The inspectors confirmed that discrepancies found during this inspection were included by the applicant in their corrective action program. A list of the Problem Evaluation Reports (PERs) resulting from this inspection is included in supplemental information attached to this report.
b. Observations and Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
During the review of the DC vital power system, the inspectors found that Battery IV was degraded and there was evidence of problems from the results of the February 2011 performance test that had not been entered into the corrective action program. This issue was followed up by the Unit 1 NRC Senior Resident Inspector for operability concerns and will be appropriately documented in a subsequent inspection report for Unit 1. The team determined that Degraded Voltage Relay settings and the associated degraded voltage analysis calculation is the subject of Open Item 30 in Appendix HH of NUREG-0847, Supplement 22. This issue will be resolved by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and was not inspected.
c. Conclusions
The inspectors determined that in general the calculations reviewed were complete, understandable, and technically adequate.
IV.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
OA.1.1 (Discussed) Construction Deficiency Report (CDR) WBRD-50-391/86-13, entitled Lack of Adequate Calculations to Document Electrical System Design Basis
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors followed up on TVA resolution of Construction Deficiency Report (CDR)
WBRD-50-391/86-13, entitled Lack of Adequate Calculations to Document Electrical System Design Basis and an associated Action Item 7 in Appendix HH of SSER 22. TVA initiated PER 144072 on February 3, 1989 associated with this issue. The inspectors examined the existing inventory of issued Unit 2 electrical design calculations and compared it to TVA NPG Standard Department Procedure NEDP-2, Design Calculation Process Control, Revision 15, Appendix E, Electrical/I&C Engineering Calculation Classifications. The purpose was to confirm that all TVA specified essential electrical and I&C calculations have been prepared and issued.
b. Observations and Findings
TVA's method of resolving the CDR was to establish a list which identifies a minimum set of Electrical and Instrumentation and Control (I&C) calculations necessary to fully document the design basis of a TVA nuclear plant. The list was first issued as a memo for electrical branch direction on July 17, 1987, and contained essential and desirable calculations. The content of that list was subsequently issued as Appendix E, Electrical/I&C Engineering Calculation Classifications of TVA NPG Standard Department Procedure NEDP-2, Design Calculation Process Control, Revision 15. TVA calculations are now organized and controlled by the Calculation Cross Reference Information System (CCRIS) computer system. The inspectors examined an index of calculations from CCRIS and found that most of the topics listed in Appendix E had corresponding calculations issued. However the inspectors could not find calculations listed for all of the topics under the headings of Raceway System Calculations or Instrumentation and Control System Calculations. TVA representatives stated that they needed to do more work on this item before it is ready for NRC review and closure and they initiated PER 458200 to track corrective action on this item. No findings of significance were identified.
c. Conclusion TVA representatives concluded that this item requires more work before it is ready for NRC review and closure and they initiated PER 458200 to track corrective actions.
Additional NRC inspection is required to close this item when TVA work is complete.
OA.1.2 (Closed) Unresolved Item 05000391/2011606-01, Ninth Example, Electrical Design Issues Requiring Additional Review
a. Inspection Scope
This unresolved item contained nine examples of electrical issues requiring further inspection to determine if a violation existed. The ninth example concerned a lack of information in calculation EDQ00099920080014, Rev. 8, Diesel Generator Loading
Analysis.
During this inspection inspectors reviewed Revision 14 of that calculation.
b. Observations and Findings
No findings of significance were identified The inspectors determined that the essential information was included and the calculation was technically acceptable.
The inspectors concluded that the failure to include information in previous revisions was a minor violation.
c. Conclusion The ninth example of this unresolved item is closed.
V. Management Meetings X.1
Exit Meeting Summary
On November 18, 2011, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. David Stinson and other members of his staff. The inspectors confirmed that no proprietary information was reviewed during this inspection or included in this inspection report.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Partial List of Persons Contacted
Applicant personnel
- A. Bangalore, Electrical Design Manager, Bechtel
- D. Beckley, Electrical Design Engineer, TVA Unit 2
- D. Charlton, Licensing, TVA
- W. Elliott, TVA Oversight
- I. Khan, Electrical Engineer, Washington Group
- D. Stinson, Vice President, TVA Unit 2
Inspection Procedure Used
TI 2515/107, Electrical Distribution System Functional Inspection (EDSFI)
List of Items Opened, Closed, and Discussed
Closed 2515/107 TI EDSFI - Assess the capacity of the EDS to perform its intended functions during all plant operating and accident
conditions. (Section E.1.1)
2011606-01 (Example #9)
URI Diesel Generator Loading Analysis - Electrical Design Issues (Section OA.1.2)
Discussed 86-13 CDR Inadequate calculations to document electrical system
design basis (Section OA.1.1)
Open Item 7
SSER-22 (App. HH)
Inadequate calculations to document electrical system design basis (Section OA.1.1)
List of Documents Reviewed
Problem Evaluation Reports Generated During This Inspection
PER 458200, NRC identified that not all calculations listed in NEDP-2, Appendix E can be found in CCRIS PER 462617, NRC identified discrepancies in calculation EDQ00299920080016, Rev. 5 PER 464997, NRC identified unanalyzed load in calculation EDQ00099920080014, Rev. 14 PER 463429, NRC identified "Calculation of Record" contradiction in calculation EDQ00023620070003, Rev. 12 PER 463512, NRC identified incorrect test result value in 1-EI-82-40A
PER 464992, NRC identified errors contained in Unit 2 protection and coordination calculations
Calculations
EDQ00299920080016, 6.9 kV Protection and Coordination Calculation, Rev. 5 EDQ00299920080004, 480V Class 1E Protection, Coordination and Thermal Overload Heater Calculation - Unit 2, Rev. 12 EDQ00023620070003, 125V DC Vital Battery System Analysis, Rev. 12
EDQ00223620080011, 125V DC Vital Power Control Voltage Analysis - Unit 2, Rev. 6 EDQ00299920080003, Class 1E MCC Control Circuit Voltage Analysis and Transformer Sizing, Rev. 4 EDQ00299920080010, 120VAC Vital Power Load Flow and Voltage Drop Analysis, Rev. 9 EDQ00099920080014, Diesel Generator Loading, Rev. 14
EDQ00099920070002, AC Auxiliary Power System Analysis, Rev. 21 EDQ00299920080006, Unit 2 Class 1E V3 Cable Ampacity, Rev. 11 EDQ00299920080002, Unit 2 Class 1E V4 Cable Ampacity, Rev. 17 EDQ00299920080001, Unit 2 V5 Cable Ampacity, Rev. 6 WBNEEBMSTI070018, 120 VAC Short Circuit Coordination Study and Protection to examine the coordination and protection of 120 volt safety related circuits, Rev. 81 WBNEEBMSTI070005, Identifies time-current curves for battery boards I-IV on sheets 84, 85 and 86 or TCC-10, 11, & 12, Rev. 49
Technical Manuals
GE Relay Instruction Manual GEK-34053G Time Overcurrent Relays IAC51.
Drawings 1-45W760-68-3, R12 - Unit 1, Wiring Diagram, Reactor Coolant System, Schematic Diagrams 1-45W724-4, R21 - Units 1 & 2, Wiring Diagrams, 6900V Shutdown Board 2B-B, Single Line
45B2766-2E Rev. 5, FCR Number 55769-A page 104 / EDCR Number 53287-A page 141 45B2766-17F Rev. 3, FCR Number 55769-A page 147 / EDCR Number 53287-A page 188
Miscellaneous
Electrical Design Guide DG-E7.1.2 Rev. 0 Titled: Protective Relay System Design for AC Auxiliary Power System, Section 2.1.3.1 Induction Motors Surveillance Procedure 0-SI-82-3, Rev. 0048 WBN Unit 0, 18 Month Loss of Offsite Power With Safety Injection - DG 1A-A, Section 6.2 ESF Actuation - Offsite Power Available DNE Calculation E31850221300, Rev. 4 - 6.9 kV Shutdown Board Normal and Alternate Feeders with EBASCO recommendation letter of February 6, 1992 EB-ALS-92-021; Subject: Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 6.9 kV Board Feeder Relay Settings (DCN M-12051) EDCR 53287 associated with the replacement of obsolete and replacement circuit breakers type ITE model EF3 and FJ3.
EDCR 54172 for the resolution of a number of motor protection settings and cable sizes EDCR 55229 for the replacement of a number of motor feeders that had been undersized EDCR 53287, Rev. A Section 6.1.7 Obsolete and Replacement Circuit Breakers PEG Package No. 2008-94001, Inverter Specification 0-MI-235.002, 120 V AC Vital Inverter Automatic Transfer Test DS-E12.6.3, Auxiliary and Control Power Cable Sizing, Up to 15,000 Volts, Rev.10
Integrated Cable and Raceway Design System (ICRDS) Software Requirements Specification, Rev. 5 WB-DC-30-28 titled: Low and Medium Voltage Power Systems, Section 2.10 Protection WBN-EEB-ED-Q000-999-2007-0002, Power System Analysis, Rev. 0 NEDP-2, Design Calculation Process Control, Rev. 15
WBRD-50-391/86-13, Lack of Adequate Calculations to Document Electrical System Design
Basis List of Acronyms
CCRIS Calculation Cross-Reference Information System CDBI Component Design Basis Inspection
CDR Construction Deficiency Report CFR Code of Federal Regulations DC Direct Current DCN Design Change Notice EDCR Engineering Document Construction Release
EDG Emergency Diesel Generator EDS Electrical Distribution System EDSFI Electrical Distribution System Functional Inspection ETAP Electrical Transient Analyzer Program FSAR Final Safety Analysis Report
GL Generic Letter IMC Inspection Manual Chapter IP Inspection Procedure KV Kilovolts MCC Motor Control Center
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission PER Problem Evaluation Report SSER Supplement Safety Evaluation Report SR Service Request TI Temporary Instruction (NRC)
TVA Tennessee Valley Authority URI Unresolved Item VAC Volts Alternating Current VDC Volts Direct Current WBN Watts Bar Nuclear Plant