ML15005A161

Southern California Edison Company, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3; Notice of Receipt; Availability; Public Meeting, and Request for Comment

ML15005A161
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	12/19/2014
From:	Nouri H, Rollinger V, Strombotne C - No Known Affiliation
To:	Bladey C K Division of Administrative Services
References
79FR61668, NRC-2014-0223
Download: ML15005A161 (23)

Text

RULEr; D RL-,' C7VF ... ,' U -" TI,-,-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC ?OII U-C29 P,1 1:29 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

Zi -i\/_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, C O N ` "Y/n m i qo h -)eron-@jT~M cbm RULES 1-, -[}-fICTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 0171 2l 9 PR i 29 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF .,R\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULES I,:L)ý RECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC C0JL r _' 29 PH1 4: 29 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFQ'IE,/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.S*c+ -eIy,, r~ / /03 -:,a 0Ue1X 4 Re/Aax),

RULS TI-VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011H C 2(2 P1 4: 29 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

-(' \ /I fl)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,6 3 I o A V et,\;I" c M r ((, 14-9)1 t 50 3 RULES Al) LD;.RICTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 DEC 29 PM 41: 29 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

-F , F /\/F 17)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern Califomia Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,&,- rot o.Vg o. 6 __.

RULES r,1, 'Lý' L ECTiVES , ... ..U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC ZL"ON ,C. 29 Pi 14: 29 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

H\/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULES) D1 11ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2011 299 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RP -As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULE) i "NL.CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20 1L rp C 29 PM1 1: 29 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

L.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerlly, RULES AIHECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC q0117 'C 29 PM H: 3_0 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

F -If/[-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULES,"L -E U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20141 LEC 29 PM 4:: 30 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFOr F- \L/F7D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, rýU F' c::,'l4J U DIKCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7o1m1 nV £ 29 PM 14: 30 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

FF- I"-\!FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spentfuel -rods remain there.&2~3l 7- C RULES ;i ©IE L"TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 701q ?EE 29 PH 4: 30 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFOF-\/'D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.cwA_ ~ ~2L HULEES Il) RECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7fJ21 0EC 29 P 14: 30 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFQFU\I/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULES ET' IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011 DEC 29 P1I1 L: 30 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF(- \/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Si ce elyS/7 e7c BULES ',,.TI IES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 0 Office of Administration, NRC , 29 P11 30 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFfF'As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, 1A A ( cI ,CA RULES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201q KC 2 9 PR q: 3o Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RPV --.... -I\.,/i--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

HULES fid ECItVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201q r,5 219 Pm 4: 30 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R F r.'-- 1\1/ D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, D1 ~C LoS A1105 Af 4.)021 M f5 5 oR\ V 1-eS0 CA ) .:i )(,c,,1 RULES i rF 'E U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 0 OFT 29 PH 4 30 Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 R F

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.S in c e r e ly , _b Vý c, t , "l , ) "

RULE, ", l IES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC ?LI 99 PHA LI: 30 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

FI- !/-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long a-s the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I ýC0-A ~f FIU .L:C CTiV,-S PULLJ ",tL(2I C U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201q DEC 29 4: 30 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

FQ' R!! D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely y,116'C,)f RULES, -, L ---,-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70LI n!,r 29 PIN Office of Administration, NRC ' U-C 2 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R F_-.Q \/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULES .f>iZiflT1VE$

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 70111 fVC 29 PI t4: m o Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF R CI- I\/"D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, 0 _ _6 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 RULES , , u FIVES 291q DEC 29 P 4: 29

Dear Commissioners,

RFOFl\I/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.

(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,