ML13232A134

PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1, Pilgrim Station Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment C, Page C174 of C413 Through Page C250 of C413

ML13232A134
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	06/17/2013
From:	Maclay L Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
2.13.056 PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev 1
Download: ML13232A134 (77)

Text

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 0174 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ NEI ULISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 049Equipment ID No. MO1400-24B Equip. Class, Motor-Operated

& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection ValveLocation:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area NORTH SIDEInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[-] NEY[-I NEi U[iE N/A[DYE! NE! UEl N/A[YEI NE-I Ur N/A[' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C175 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NF-Z U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 049Equipment ID No. M01400-24B Equip. Class Motor-Operated

& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection Valve5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NE] U-] N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[] UEpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 64.4 (C942Sh 1, EO) is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Scaffolding is currently being erected below to the valves to allowaccess to them. This is a work in progress and is tagged appropriately.

All extra equipment in the area is properly secured and cart wheels arechoked.YZ NEJ uE1 N/AD-YZ NE- uEr N/A[-]YZ NEl U[-fl N/AEDYZ NEI UE-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 0176 of C413AT'rACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YZ NEI UM-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 049Equipment ID No. M01400-24B Equip. Class Motor-Operated

& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description Core Spray B Iniection ValveOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YZ NUEI 1Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is AWC-019.4oj"Wacha Evaluated by: Laura MaclayV I(JDate: 10-15-1210-15-12QA, .A 1,hk , -AGarv SwederEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C177 of C413SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMATTACHMEI Sheet 4 ofT 9.64Status: YZ N[- ULISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 049Equipment ID No. M01400-24B Equip. Class Motor-Operated

& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection ValvePhotographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 0 178 of 0413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: Y[ NE] U-IIISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 050Equipment ID No. MO1400-25B Equip. Classi Motor-Operated

& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection ValveLocation:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 RiManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area NORTH SIDEInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[-] NZY[E] N[-] U-I N/ASY[E] NEi ULE- NWASYEI NEI UL-- N/A[I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C179 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YN N-] UrSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 050Equipment ID No. M01400-25B Equip. Class Motor-Operated

& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection Valve5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[-] N[-] UF- N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y] Nr] UiE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Noted a hanging light next to the valve is property restrained againstlateral movement, therefore not a seismic hazard.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 64.4 (C942Sh 1, EO) is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Scaffolding is currently being erected below to the valves to allowaccess to them. This is a work in progress and is tagged appropriately.

All extra equipment in the area is properly secured and cart wheels arechoked.YZ NEI U[E] N/AE]Y0 NE'] u[-] NIAE]YZ NE] uE] NIAE]Y NE-I U-]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C 180 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: Y[ NF U-ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 050Equipment ID No. M01400-25B Equip. Class Motor-Operated

& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection ValveOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEJ UL-Iadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments

.(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is AWC-019.TSG" ." "k. ý,Evaluated by: Gary SwederDate: 10-15-120I Ltqd/qv10-15-12I aura MaClav %-kW 0,-ý ac -0(11 jVWciEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 0 181 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ NE] U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 050Equipment ID No. M01400-25B Equip. Class Motor-Operated

& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection ValveNote: Equipment tag 1400-25BNote: Overall view of valve from sideEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C182 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: Y[ NFI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 050Equipment ID No. M01400-25B Equip. Class Motor-Operated

& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection ValveNote: Scaffold erection in progressNote:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C183 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: Y[ NFl UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 051Equipment ID No. M01400-3A Equip. Class, Motor-Operated

& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description Core SprayA Supp Pool SuctionLocation:

Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Room, Area SE QDManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YLI NZYE-] N[-] UI-- N/ANYE] NE] U[-] N/AEYEr NE] U[:] N/AI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0O01, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C 184 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YN NEI U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 051Equipment ID No. M01400-3A Equip. Class Motor-Operated

& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description Core Spray A Supp Pool Suction5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[-I NEi Ur1 N/A0(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE] U[]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead lighting adequately mounted at an angle over the valve,therefore not a seismic hazard.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y[ NEI uEr N/AE-YZ NEI UE- N/A[-]Y[I NEI U[-] N/A[--10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C185 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YN NEO UEISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 051Equipment ID No. M01400-3A Equip. Class Motor-Operated

& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description Core Sorav A Suaw Pool SuctionOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YNNEI UEJComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is on AWC-032.Evaluated by: Gary Sweder Date: 10-9-12qv""-Wac-Qý Laura Maclay10-9-12LauraMacla EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C 186 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YE NEI UDSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 051Equipment ID No. M01400-3A Equip. Class Motor-Operated

& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)Equipment Description Core Spray A Supp Pool SuctionPhotographs Note: Equipment TagEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OO001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 0 187 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YZ NF Ur-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 052Equipment ID No. VAC-202A Equip. Class' Fans (9), Air Handlers (10), Temp. Sensors (19)Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm CoolingLocation:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 2.75 Room, Area SW QDManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Reference C359Sh 1, E1 (Detail 8)2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE NFIY[ NEI U[I N/AZ-Y; NEI ULI N/AZ"Y[ NEI UIE- N/AE-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 0188 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YZ NE-] uIILSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 052Equipment ID No. VAC-202A Equip. Class Fans (9), Air Handlers (10). Temp. Sensors (19)Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm Coolinq5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NEI UD- N/A[-](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference drawing C359 SHI, detail 8. Anchorage for the steel frameon which VAC-202A is mounted was verified.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ ND"] UD]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ N[D] UD- N/AD-]YZ ND] U[-] N/AD-YZ NDl UD-- N/AD-YZ NF-D UrEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C0189 of 0413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: Y[ NO Ur-ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 052Equipment ID No. VAC-202A Equip. Class Fans (9). Air Handlers (10). Temp. Sensors (19)Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm CoolingOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N[: U-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Mild surface oxidation on the frame due to lack of paint after work wascompleted (See Picture).

Facilities Request 9477 has been made torequest painting of frame.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SEWs package for VAC-202A indicates neoprene vibration isolators need to be addressed to preventunacceptable horizontal or vertical displacements during a seismic event. FRN 98-01-33 providesdetails for the installation of limit stop devices.

The walkdown verified the installation of the limit stopdevices per the FRN documentation.

Area Walk-By Checklist is A WC-006.Evaluated by: Gary Sweder )AdAO 4 N k .Date: 10/3/12I-cu r,, (3I RI~rR MAklv~I10/3/12Laura Maclavt/ .QJEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C 190 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: Y[ Nr ] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 052Equipment ID No. VAC-202A Equip. Class Fans (9). Air Handlers (10), Temp. Sensors (19)Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm CoolingPhotographs Note:Note: overall view of equipment EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C191 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YZ Nr-1 U--iSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 052Equipment ID No. VAC-202A Equip. Class Fans (9), Air Handlers (10), Temp. Sensors (19)Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm CoolingNote: Limit stop device and lack of paint atlocations of work areaEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage 0192 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ NF UD-'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 053Equipment ID No. VAC-202B Equip. Classi Fans (9), Air Handlers (10), Temp. Sensors (19)Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm CoolinqLocation:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 2.75 RManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) oom, Area SWQDInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

C91, E2 Detail I used to verify anchorage

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YN N[-]YN NEl U[D] N/AD-Y[ ND U[-] N/ADlY] NDI UED N/ADIEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C193 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NEi UrLSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 053Equipment ID No. VAC-202B Equip. Class Fans (9), Air Handlers (10), Temp. Sensors (19)Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm Cooling5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ ND] UF] N/AD](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Dimensions were spot checked using C91, E2 and verified to beaccurate.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ ND- Ur-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

VAC-202A overhead9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NDI uED N/AD]YN NDI uD-] N/AD-]YN N[D] UD- N/AD-YZ NDJ UD-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C194 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: Y[ N[- UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 053Equipment ID No. VAC-202B Equip. Class Fans (9). Air Handlers (10). Temp. Sensors (19)Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm CoolingOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 N[E] U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SEWs package for VAC-202B indicates neoprene vibration isolators need to be addressed to preventunacceptable horizontal or vertical displacements during a seismic event. FRN 98-01-33 providesdetails for the installation of limit stop devices.

The walkdown verified the installation of the limit stopdevices per the FRN documentation.

Area Walk-By Checklist is A WC-006.Evaluated by: Gary Sweder ,dQ, ..oGDate: 10-03-12Ym=7JAffa?~o ajLaura Maclav10-03-12Laura MaclavI(JEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C195 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ NIF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 053Equipment ID No. VAC-202B Equip. Class Fans (9), Air Handlers (10), Temp. Sensors (19)Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm CoolingPhotographs EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C196 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YE NF-] Ur-DSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 054Equipment ID No. P208C Equip. Class' Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description SSW Pump CLocation:

Bldg. IS Floor El. 25.5 Room, Area C COMPManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE Nil2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YZ NEI UiZ N/AZ--YZ N[-] Uil N/AZlYZ NEI U N/ARlTight vertical crack (less than 1/8') on northwest comer of pedestal.

Judged to be insignificant; therefore, it presents no seismic hazard. Seeattached photo.1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C197 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YM NE] Ur--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 054Equipment ID No. P208C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description SSWPump C5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NEi UrI N/AE-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Calculation C15.0.2901, Rev. 1, and Drawing C-45, Rev.E18.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N-] Ur-]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry block wall 45.2 is seismically qualified.

See drawing C-939 SH1, Rev. EO.Fluorescent light fixture above the west side of the P208C cubicle issuspended by an open S-hook. The fixture does not pose a crediblethreat to P208C; however, it could possibly damage other instruments within the room if it were to swing/fall during a seismic event. SeeAWC-031 for details.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YZ NE] uiE] N/A[-]YZ N-] UE] N/AE]YN NE] u[-] N/AE]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NE]i UIEof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C198 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: Yo NE] Ur-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 054Equipment ID No. P208C Equip. Class Vertical Pumos (06)Equipment Description SSW Pump COther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

P208C was out of service at the time of inspection.

The motor was decoupled from the pump and thetop cover was removed from the motor. This was not noted as a concern, as the opening had theappropriate FME cover (see attached photo).SWEL 1-054 is on AWC-031.dn 2-P iiEvaluated by: David SmallDate: 10/03/2012 Halie Aroz d 1!)10/03/2012

%</- IEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C199 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: Y[ NMJ U'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 054Equipment ID No. P208C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description SSWPump CPhotographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C200 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YZ NI-] UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 054Equipment ID No. P208C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description SSWPump CNote: Typical anchor bolts.Note: Tight vertical crack in pedestal.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C201 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YE NFj UDlSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 055Equipment ID No. P208D Equip. Class, Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description SSWPump DLocation:

Bldg. IS Floor El. 25.5 Room, Area B COMPManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ NEi2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE NEi U[-] N/A[-]YE NEi U[L N/A'-YE NE] Ur- N/A[-]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C202 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YZ NIT U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 055Equipment ID No. P208D Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description SSWPump D5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ NF] Ur- N/AR(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Calculation C15.0.1869, Rev. 1, and Drawing C-45, Rev.E18.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NEI U[potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry walls 45.2 and 45.3 are seismically qualified.

See drawing C-939 SH 1, Rev. EO.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y] N[D] Ul-- N/AD--Y[ NDJ U-- N/AD-]YO ND:] UDJ N/AD-]YZ ND:] urEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C203 of C413Ar"ACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YE NE] UF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 055Equipment ID No. P208D Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description SSWPump DOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D NE] U[-Iadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-055 is on AWC-005.Evaluated by:David Small 2 9J AA44Halie ArozDate: 10/03/2012 10/03/2012 L.)EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C204 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ No- UfiSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 055Equipment ID No. P208D Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description SSWPump DPhotographs Note:Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C205 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YZ No UF']Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 055Equipment ID No. P208D Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description SSWPump DEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. IAttachment CPage C206 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 4Status: YZ NE] UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 056Equipment ID No. P208E Equip. Class, Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description SSWPump ELocation:

Bldg. IS Floor El. 25.5 Room, Area B COMPManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YZ N[-]2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Pedestal is cut on southeast comer to accommodate piping. This looksdeliberate and is not close to the bolt, so it is therefore not considered aseismic hazard.YO NE]I U11 N/AL]YE N[] ULI N/A[--YZ NF-] U-] N/A[I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C207 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NE U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 056Equipment ID No. P208E Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description SSWPump E5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YM NEI UI-- N/A--(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Calculation C15.0.1869, Rev. 1, and Drawing C-45, Rev.E18.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry walls 45.2 and 45.3 are seismically qualified.

See drawing C-939 SH 1, Rev. EO.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UE- N/A[--YZ NEi UI- N/AE--YN NR U[-- N/AE1YZ NEI UErEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C208 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: Y[ NZ UEZSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 056Equipment ID No. P208E Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description SSW Pump EOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI uEFadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-056 is on A WC-005.D ,=J Li?Evaluated by: David SmallHalie ArozDate: 10/03/2012 10/03/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C209 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: YZ NRI UrLSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 056Equipment ID No. P208E Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)Equipment Description SSWPump EPhotographs Note:Note: Typical anchor bolt.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C210 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: Y[ NF Ul-'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 057Equipment ID No. P202D Equip. Class' Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCWPump D Loop BLocation:

Bldg. AXBAY Floor El. 3 Room, Area B COMPManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YZ Nr-12. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YZ NEIl UEI N/A[-YZ NEil U[] N/Ar-Y[ N[] UEI N/ADIEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C211 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YN NE] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 057Equipment ID No. P202D Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCWPump D Loop B5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[E N[-] U[-I N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Drawings C-185, Rev. E7 and C-186, Rev. E3.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN ND] U[-Dpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

There is some loose foam insulation secured with duct tape on thedischarge valve for P202D. As the mass for the insulation is very low, itdoes not present an adverse seismic interaction.

CR-PNP-2012-04405 was written to address this as a general plant housekeeping concern,and WR 286056 was initiated for repair.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NDl UD- N/AD-]YZ NDI UD- N/AD-YZ NDI UD- N/AD]YM N[-- UrEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C212 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YZ NEI UEISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 057Equipment ID No. P202D Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCW Pump D Loop BOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL1-057 is on AWC-003.00,w L4AEvaluated by: David SmallDate: 10/04/2012 Halie ArozIte010/04/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C213 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ NR UrSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 057Equipment ID No. P202D Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCWPump D Loop BPhotographs Note:Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C214 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YZ NE] UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 057Equipment ID No. P202D Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCWPump D Loop BNote: Typical anchor bolt.Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C215 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 5Status: Y[ NI]I ULISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 058Equipment ID No. P202E Equip. Classi Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCWPump E Loop BLocation:

Bldg. AXBAY Floor El. 3 Room, Area B COMPManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ NEIl2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YZ NElI UL N/A[--Y[ Nj3 IEu N/AZ]Y[ NEJ Ur] N/AD-]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C216 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: Y[ NE] UW--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 058Equipment ID No. P202E -Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCWPump E Loop B5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NEI Ur-] N/A[--(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Drawings C-185, Rev. E7 and C-186, Rev. E3.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YJZ NW UW-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

There is some loose foam insulation secured with duct tape on thedischarge valve for P202E. As the mass for the insulation is very low, itdoes not present an adverse seismic interaction.

CR-PNP-2012-04405 was written to address this as a general plant housekeeping concern,and WR 286056 was initiated for repair.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NW1 UW1 N/AE-]YN NW UW N/A--YM NW U-] N/A EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C217 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YZ NE] Ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 058Equipment ID No. P202E Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCWPump E Loop BOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI Ur-Wadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

One alignment (jacking) bolt on the southeast corner of P202E wasmissing from the motor. This screw has no function in the operation ofthe equipment after installation, so this is not considered an adverseseismic condition.

Three alignment (jacking) bolts were observed to be in contact with themotor housing which is contrary to standard practice of backing out thealignment bolts after alignment is achieved and primary mountinghardware is secured.

This condition was previously identified by CR-PNP-2011-3626.

Work Order 286700 is scheduled to correct thiscondition.

See attached photo.Comments

.(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The tag number on P202E was missing.

Operations was notified, and an ESOMS label request wasinitiated.

See CR-PNP-2012-044

11. The equipment was verified for the walkdown using auxiliary equipment tags (see attached photo).SWEL 1-058 is on A WC-003.[99 JL1Evaluated by: David SmallDate: 10/04/2012 Ha Aryi7U10/04/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C218 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: Y[ NEI U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 058Equipment ID No. P202E Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCWPump E Loop BPhotographs Note: Tag number of auxiliary equipment thatalso identifies P202E.Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C219 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YZ NI] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 058Equipment ID No. P202E Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCWPumj E Loo) BNote: Typical anchor bolt.Note: Alignment bolt in contact with motorhousing.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C220 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 5Status: YM NF] UISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 059Equipment ID No. P202F Equip. Class' Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCWPump F Loop BLocation:

Bldg. AXBAY Floor El. 3 Room, Area B COMPManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN NE]2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?There is a small chip out of the east end of the pedestal that is judgedto be insignificant.

YZ N[] U-I N/AI3YE N] U[-I] N/A-]YZ N[] U-] N/A[-]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C221 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YZ NR UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 059Equipment ID No. P202F Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCWPump F Loop B5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ N[l UiD N/A[-](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Drawings C-185, Rev. E7 and C-186, Rev. E3.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NDI UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YZ NDI UD] N/AD-There is some partially detached foam insulation on the discharge valvefor P202F. As the mass for the insulation is very low, it does notpresent an adverse seismic interaction.

CR-PNP-2012-04405 waswritten to address this as a general plant housekeeping

concern, andWR 286056 was initiated for repair.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDl UD-- N/ADand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y[ NDI UD1 N/AD-10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDl UDlof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C222 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: Y0I NEI Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 059Equipment ID No. P202F Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCWPump F Loop BOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NE] U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL1-059 is on AWC-003.Evaluated by: David Small .A /, e /dHalie Aroz jIDate: 10/04/2012 10/04/2012 C)EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C223 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ NF Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 059Equipment ID No. P202F Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCWPump F Loop BPhotographs EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C224 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: Y[ N[-I U[IIISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 059Equipment ID No. P202F Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)Equipment Description RBCCWPump F Loop BNote: Typical anchor bolt.Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C225 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 6Status: Y[ NE] U-DSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 060Equipment ID No. E209B Equip. Class, Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description RBCCW Loop B Heat Exchanger Location:

Bldg. AXBAY Floor El. 3 Room, Area B COMPManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NOIof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Both anchors in the south pedestal and the east anchor in the northpedestal are slightly skewed, and the west anchor in the north pedestalis not engaged by a small amount (approx.

Y2 thread).

These conditions are judged to be acceptable, and are not considered a seismic hazard.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[ N[-] Ur-] N/Ar-YE ND] ul- N/AD-'YN NDI uF- N/ADII Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C226 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 6Status: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 060Equipment ID No. E209B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description RBCCW Loop B Heat Exchanger

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NEi Ur- N/AF-](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Drawing C-185, Rev. E7, FRN 98-01-78, and FRN 95-01-60.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] UI-'potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

There is scaffolding very close to E209B that has a seismic evaluation tag, so it is acceptable for interaction effects.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The Marinite board separating cable trays in the southwest corner ofthe room has some pieces missing.

There are currently no pieces thatare hanging off or look ready to fall, so it does not present a seismicinteraction hazard.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YZ NE] UE-- N/AE-YZ NE] UEr] N/AE]Y[ NE[] U[] N/AE110. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C227 of C413ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 6Status: YZ NO UMISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 060Equipment ID No. E209B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description RBCCW Loop B Heat Exchanger Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 Nr-I UMadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A loose label for equipment

1. 29-HO-3840 was found on the west side of E209B on the northpedestal.

This was reported to Operations and an ESOMS request has been initiated.

See CR-PNP-2012-04411.

SWEL 1-060 is on AWC-003.Evaluated by: David Small 22Date: 10/04/2012 Halie Aroz a10/04/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C228 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 6Status: YZ NF UFSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 060Equipment ID No. E209B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description RBCCWLooo B Heat Exchanger Photographs Note:Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C229 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 6Status: YE NE] UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 060Equipment ID No. E209B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description RBCCWLooo B Heat Exchanqer Note: Typical south pedestal anchor bolt.Note: Typical north pedestal anchor bolt.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C230 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 6 of 6Status: Y[ NEI UIrSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 060Equipment ID No. E209B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)Equipment Description RBCCW Loop B Heat Exchanger Note: North pedestal modification.

Note: North pedestal modification.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering ReportNo. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C231 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YZ NIF UI-ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 061Equipment ID No. C2205A Equip. Class, Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackLocation:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 Room, Area EastManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The SEWs package for this component conservatively evaluates one offour various instrument rack anchorages.

This rack was not evaluated, and therefore configuration can not be verified by the package.

Allbolts are visible, so the remainder of this section is applicable.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[-] YN NDJ UEI N/AL:]Y[ NDJ U-- N/ADYN NDI U-- N/AD1Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C232 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YE NEI UDSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 061Equipment ID No. C2205A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr Rack5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[-- NO UI- N/AE(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question

1. 1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ ND UDpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

C2205A is bolted to C2205B, so this is not a seismic interaction concern.

C2205A is also adjacent to but not bolted to A TWS rack 2275;however, there is sufficient clearance

( > 2") between the racks.Therefore, this is not considered a potentially adverse seismicinteraction.

One set screw is missing on the fence enclosing the racks. This is not aseismic hazard since the fence is judged to still be securely mounted tothe floor, but CR-PNP-2012-04659 was written and WR 287549initiated to address the concern.

See attached photo.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YN NW UW N/A[D]YN ND u[:] N/AD-IYS NW UD:] N/AD-I10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C233 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YoI NEI ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 061Equipment ID No. C2205A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-061 is on AWC-021.Evaluated by: Laura Maclay & AQL-2& "Halie Aroz 11 KDate: 10/17/2012 10/17/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C234 of C413ATnACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: Y] NF- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 061Equipment ID No. C2205A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackPhotographs Note:Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C235 of C413AT-IACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: Y[ NE] U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 061Equipment ID No. C2205A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackNote: Missing set screw on fence.Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C236 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 4Status: YZ NR- U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 062Equipment ID No. C2205B Equip. Class, Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackLocation:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 Room, Area EastManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The SEWs package for this component conservatively evaluates one offour various instrument rack anchorages.

This rack was not evaluated, and therefore configuration can not be verified by the package.

Allbolts are visible, so the remainder of this section is applicable.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[--] NO:YEE NEJ URL N/AD--YO NE] U[] N/AL]YN N[] U-- N/Ar-' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C237 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NIEj U[-']Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 062Equipment ID No. C2205B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr Rack5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YrI NR] U[I N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question

1. 1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UrIpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NI] u[-] N/A[-]YN NE] U-I] N/A--Y[ NEI UL-] N/Ar]Y[ NE] U[-EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C238 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 4Status: YO] NnZur U]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 062Equipment ID No. C2205B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI U[:]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL1-062 is on AWC-021.Evaluated Date: 10/17/2012 10/17/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C239 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 4Status: Y[ NF- U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 062Equipment ID No. C2205B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackPhotographs Note: Equipment tagNote: Overall view of instrument rack fromoutside of fencing.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C240 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 6Status: YE NDI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 063Equipment ID No. C2206A Equip. Class, Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackLocation:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 Room, Area WestManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The SEWs package conservatively evaluates similar rack C2206B,which has only six anchors, and comparatively accepts the eightanchorage configuration for rack C2206A. Therefore, since a drawingdoes not specify the eight bolt configuration, this component was notchosen for the 50% verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[-] NZYE NI UE-I N/A[--YE ND UD N/ADYE NDI U' N/AD' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C241 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 6Status: YZ NIF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 063Equipment ID No. C2206A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr Rack5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YrI NR UI- N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question

1. 1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEi UIZpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Racks C2206A and C2206B are bolted together and therefore do notpose a seismic risk to each other.The robust barrier fence around Racks C2206A & C2206B has setscrews missing from the base brackets of three of the vertical posts.The fence consists of an interconnected framework of light supportmembers and wire mesh. The weight and mass of the assembly isrelatively low. The remaining posts (approx 5) have the set screwsinstalled.

The base brackets with the missing set screws still function toresist lateral loads. Since vertical seismic accelerations are less than Ig(Ref Spec C114ERQ),

there is no expected uplift at the post locations.

Based on these considerations, the identified condition does notrepresent a potential adverse seismic interaction.

CR-PNP-2012-04627 was written to replace missing screws.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The west masonry block walls next to the rack, 65.9 and 65.10 aresafety related.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NDI UD- N/AD-]YZ NDl UD- N/AD-'YZ NDI Ur- N/AD-Y[ NDl UD1EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C242 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 6Status: YZ NE] ULISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 063Equipment ID No. C2206A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[-] Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cover for pressure transmitter 36-PT-654 is missing one of fourbolts which keep the cover secured to the equipment.

This is not aseismic concern due the redundancy of the other three bolts. CR-PNP-2012-04629 was written to address this item and calls for replacement of the missing fastener.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is A WC-020.~&]flAcA~~?fYJ~ic

~Evaluated by. Laura Ma .Date: 10-16-12,ý"ma-Wac OamAq I A. 16-12IJUI V !dUSwg'Jg

'.1A.4 %-1LJ AjEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C243 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 6Status: YZ NR UDSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 063Equipment ID No. C2206A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackPhotographs Note: Equipment tagNote: Overall view of rack outside of fencingEN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C244 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 6Status: Y[ NI I U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 063Equipment ID No. C2206A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackNote: Typical anchorsNote: Back of cover for pressure transmitter ismissing a bolt (CR-PNP-2012-04629).

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C245 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 6 of 6Status: Y[ NI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 063Equipment ID No. C2206A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackNote: Missing screw in fence base bracket(CR-PNP-2012-04627).

Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C246 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 5Status: YZ NE] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 064Equipment ID No. C2206B Equip. Class, Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackLocation:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 Room, Area WestManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ NE]2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE NE] ULI N/AElYE NE] UE] N/AE]YE NE] UE] N/Ar-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C247 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YN NE] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 064Equipment ID No. C2206B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr Rack5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YN NEI U[r] N/A[-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to SEWs package dated 6/19/95 for anchorage configuration.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI ULIpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Racks C2206A and C2206B are bolted together and therefore do notpose a seismic risk to each other.There is a 3" gap between C2276 and C2206B. However, both racksare well anchored.

The robust barrier fence around Racks C2206A & C2206B has setscrews missing from the base brackets of three of the vertical posts.The fence consists of an interconnected framework of light supportmembers and wire mesh. The weight and mass of the assembly isrelatively low. The remaining posts (approx 5) have the set screwsinstalled.

The base brackets with the missing set screws still function toresist lateral loads. Since vertical seismic accelerations are less than Ig(Ref Spec C1 14ERQ), there is no expected uplift at the post locations.

Based on these considerations, the identified condition does notrepresent a potential adverse seismic interaction.

CR-PNP-2012-04627 was written to replace missing screws.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The west masonry block walls next to the rack, 65.9 and 65.10 aresafety related.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UE- N/A[-]YZ NEI U[-] N/A[-]YN NEI UE] N/AE-YN NE ]UE]EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C248 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YZ NEI UDýSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 064Equipment ID No. C2206B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE]i Ur]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is A WC-020.Evaluated by: Laura Maly '~aA A kCkQVLGary Sweder Aal~ \~.tL.o_(3 -Date: 10-16-1210-16-12EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C249 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YN Nn--I UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 064Equipment ID No. C2206B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackPhotographs Note: Equipment tagNote: Overall view of both racks C2206A andC2206B.EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment CPage C250 of C413ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: Y[ NR UrSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 064Equipment ID No. C2206B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr RackNote: Missing set screw in surrounding fencing (CR-PNP-2012-04627)

Note:EN-DC-168 REV 0