ML15082A066: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1RULES As of: 3/18/15 4:36 PMReceived: March 18, 2015Status: PendingPostPUBLI I S Pel If: 5 Tracking No. ljz-8hsd-54huComments Due: March 23, 2015Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2015-0004 RF '7\!FDEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Statiofh Post-Shutdown DecommissioningActivities ReportComment On: NRC-2015-0004-0001Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown DecommissioningActivities ReportDocument: NRC-2015-0004-DRAFT-0014Comment on FR Doc # 2015-004505Submitter InformationName: Susan Lantz ' -Address: t9 Northamtpon, MA,Email: susanlantzl@gmail.comGeneral CommentTo the members of the NRC:Living 30 miles downstream and down air from Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant I am deeply concernedabout and committed to monitoring the decommissioning of Vermont Yankee. I understand that there is noestablished protocol for dismantling a merchant plant. I sincerely hope that the NRC listens to the the Tri-StateCitizens Decommissioning Committee and moves carefully and thoughtfully moving forward in this process. Ibelieve safety, not cost, should be the bottom line of actions taken.To that end, I expect the NRC to rule against any decrease in the Emergency Planning Zone in size or securityforce while spent fuel. rods are still in the large overfilled pool. This spent fuel presents as deadly a risk as anoperating plant as is easily shown with Fukuschima. Entergy should not be allowed to decrease the EPZ orreduce the size of the security force until all spent fuel is put into dry cask storage.In that the NRC exists to protect the peoples' rights and safety I expect you to rule against any use by Entergy ofVY's decommissioning fund to place the spent fuel rods into dry cask storage. This process is standardprocedure of running a nuclear power plant and should come from Entergy's budget. The 1/2 million plusdecommissioning fund which Entergy has added nothing to, is about half of what will be needed and should notbe reduced further. Please protect the people of Vermont from inheriting this burden after Entergy has left town.SUNSI Review CompleteTemplate = ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add= ,https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648 1 a4e8a9&tor... 03/18/2015}}
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1RULES As of: 3/18/15 4:36 PMReceived:
March 18, 2015Status: PendingPost PUBLI I S Pel If: 5 Tracking No. ljz-8hsd-54hu Comments Due: March 23, 2015Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2015-0004 RF '7\!FDEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Statiofh Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities ReportComment On: NRC-2015-0004-0001 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities ReportDocument:
NRC-2015-0004-DRAFT-0014 Comment on FR Doc # 2015-00450 5Submitter Information Name: Susan Lantz ' -Address:
t9 Northamtpon, MA,Email: susanlantzl@gmail.com General CommentTo the members of the NRC:Living 30 miles downstream and down air from Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant I am deeply concerned about and committed to monitoring the decommissioning of Vermont Yankee. I understand that there is noestablished protocol for dismantling a merchant plant. I sincerely hope that the NRC listens to the the Tri-State Citizens Decommissioning Committee and moves carefully and thoughtfully moving forward in this process.
Ibelieve safety, not cost, should be the bottom line of actions taken.To that end, I expect the NRC to rule against any decrease in the Emergency Planning Zone in size or securityforce while spent fuel. rods are still in the large overfilled pool. This spent fuel presents as deadly a risk as anoperating plant as is easily shown with Fukuschima.
Entergy should not be allowed to decrease the EPZ orreduce the size of the security force until all spent fuel is put into dry cask storage.In that the NRC exists to protect the peoples' rights and safety I expect you to rule against any use by Entergy ofVY's decommissioning fund to place the spent fuel rods into dry cask storage.
This process is standardprocedure of running a nuclear power plant and should come from Entergy's budget. The 1/2 million plusdecommissioning fund which Entergy has added nothing to, is about half of what will be needed and should notbe reduced further.
Please protect the people of Vermont from inheriting this burden after Entergy has left town.SUNSI Review CompleteTemplate  
= ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add= ,https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648 1 a4e8a9&tor...
03/18/2015}}

Revision as of 03:50, 1 July 2018

Comment (12) of Susan Lantz on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML15082A066
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 03/18/2015
From: Lantz S
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
80FR1975 00012, NRC-2015-0004
Download: ML15082A066 (1)
v • d • e


Text

Page 1 of 1RULES As of: 3/18/15 4:36 PMReceived:

March 18, 2015Status: PendingPost PUBLI I S Pel If: 5 Tracking No. ljz-8hsd-54hu Comments Due: March 23, 2015Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2015-0004 RF '7\!FDEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Statiofh Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities ReportComment On: NRC-2015-0004-0001 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities ReportDocument:

NRC-2015-0004-DRAFT-0014 Comment on FR Doc # 2015-00450 5Submitter Information Name: Susan Lantz ' -Address:

t9 Northamtpon, MA,Email: susanlantzl@gmail.com General CommentTo the members of the NRC:Living 30 miles downstream and down air from Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant I am deeply concerned about and committed to monitoring the decommissioning of Vermont Yankee. I understand that there is noestablished protocol for dismantling a merchant plant. I sincerely hope that the NRC listens to the the Tri-State Citizens Decommissioning Committee and moves carefully and thoughtfully moving forward in this process.

Ibelieve safety, not cost, should be the bottom line of actions taken.To that end, I expect the NRC to rule against any decrease in the Emergency Planning Zone in size or securityforce while spent fuel. rods are still in the large overfilled pool. This spent fuel presents as deadly a risk as anoperating plant as is easily shown with Fukuschima.

Entergy should not be allowed to decrease the EPZ orreduce the size of the security force until all spent fuel is put into dry cask storage.In that the NRC exists to protect the peoples' rights and safety I expect you to rule against any use by Entergy ofVY's decommissioning fund to place the spent fuel rods into dry cask storage.

This process is standardprocedure of running a nuclear power plant and should come from Entergy's budget. The 1/2 million plusdecommissioning fund which Entergy has added nothing to, is about half of what will be needed and should notbe reduced further.

Please protect the people of Vermont from inheriting this burden after Entergy has left town.SUNSI Review CompleteTemplate

= ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add= ,https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648 1 a4e8a9&tor...

03/18/2015

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15082A066&oldid=780770"