ML16144A006: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm | {{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Purnell, Blake Sent:Friday, May 20, 2016 8:59 AM To:Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc) | ||
(thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com) | |||
Cc:Gudger, David T:(GenCo-Nuc) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Exelon Generation Company, LLC - Fleet Relief Request to use Code Case N-513-4 (CAC Nos. MF7301 - MF7322)Attachments:Exelon Code Case N-513-4 RAI.pdfMr. Loomis: | Exelon Generation Company, LLC - Fleet Relief Request to use Code Case N-513-4 (CAC Nos. MF7301 - MF7322) | ||
Attachments: | |||
Exelon Code Case N-513-4 RAI.pdfMr. Loomis: | |||
By application dated January 28, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16029A003), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) submitted a request in accordance with Paragraph 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) for a proposed alternative to the requirements of Section XI, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code) for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Limerick Generation Station, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2; R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant; and Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The proposed alternative would allow the licensee to use ASME Code Case N 513-4, "Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping section XI, Division 1," for the evaluation and temporary acceptance of flaws in moderate energy Class 2 and 3 piping in lieu of specified ASME Code requirements. | |||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the application and determined that additional information is needed for the staff to complete its review. Provide a response to the attached request for additional information within 30 days. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-1380. | |||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
Blake Purnell, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission DOCKET NOS. STN 50-456, STN 50-457, STN 50-454, STN 50-455, 50-317, 50-318, 50-461, 50-237, 50-249, 50-373, 50-374, 50-352, 50-353, 50-220, 50-410, 50-219, 50-277, 50-278, 50-254, 50-265, 50-244, AND 50-289 Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA | Blake Purnell, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
DOCKET NOS. STN 50-456, STN 50-457, STN 50-454, STN 50-455, 50-317, 50-318, 50-461, 50-237, 50-249, 50-373, 50-374, 50-352, 50-353, 50-220, 50-410, 50-219, 50-277, 50-278, 50-254, 50-265, 50-244, AND 50-289 Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2856 Mail Envelope Properties (Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov20160520085800) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Exelon Generation Company, LLC - Fleet Relief Request to use Code Case N-513-4 (CAC Nos. MF7301 - MF7322) Sent Date: 5/20/2016 8:58:45 AM Received Date: 5/20/2016 8:58:00 AM | Exelon Generation Company, LLC - Fleet Relief Request to use Code Case N-513-4 (CAC Nos. MF7301 - MF7322) Sent Date: 5/20/2016 8:58:45 AM Received Date: 5/20/2016 8:58:00 AM From: Purnell, Blake Created By: Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov Recipients: "Gudger, David T:(GenCo-Nuc)" <David.Gudger@exeloncorp.com> Tracking Status: None "Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc) (thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com)" <thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2165 5/20/2016 8:58:00 AM Exelon Code Case N-513-4 RAI.pdf 78190 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: | ||
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE TO USE ASME CODE CASE N-789 BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; BYRON STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2; CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2; CLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1; DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3; LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION; PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3; QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; AND THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1. | ||
Ginna Nuclear Power Plant; and Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The proposed alternative would allow the licensee to use ASME Code Case N-513-4, "Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping section XI, Division 1," for the evaluation and temporary acceptance of flaws in moderate energy Class 2 and 3 piping in lieu of specified ASME Code requirements. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the application and determined that the following information is needed for the staff to complete its review. | EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC DOCKET NOS. STN 50-456, STN 50-457, STN 50-454, STN 50-455, 50-317, 50-318, 50-461, 50-237, 50-249, 50-373, 50-374, 50-352, 50-353, 50-220, 50-410, 50-219, 50-277, 50-278, 50-254, 50-265, 50-244, AND 50-289 By application dated January 28, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16029A003), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) submitted a request in accordance with Paragraph 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) for a proposed alternative to the requirements of Section XI, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code) for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Limerick Generation Station, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2; R. E. | ||
Ginna Nuclear Power Plant; and Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The proposed alternative would allow the licensee to use ASME Code Case N-513-4, "Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping section XI, Division 1," for the evaluation and temporary acceptance of flaws in moderate energy Class 2 and 3 piping in lieu of specified ASME Code requirements. | |||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the application and determined that the following information is needed for the staff to complete its review. | |||
RAI-1 Code Case N-513-4 provides criteria which would allow the licensee to accept flaws, including through-wall flaws, in moderate energy Class 2 or 3 piping including elbows, bent pipe, reducers, expanders, and branch tees, without performing a repair or replacement activity for a limited time, not to exceed the next schedule refueling outage. Paragraph 1(f) states: | |||
The provisions of this Case demonstrate the integrity of the item and not the consequences of leakage. It is the responsibility of the Owner to consider effects of leakage in demonstrating system operability and performing plant flooding analyses. | |||
The proposed alternative does not specify a maximum leakage rate for which the alternative may be used. Through operating experience and information provided in other relief requests, the NRC staff has identified cases where leak rates increased from drops per minute to gallons per minute (gpm) before the next refueling schedule. Based on this, the staff requires additional information regarding the management of leakage and the possibility of large leak rates which can erode defense-in-depth and lead to adverse consequences. The NRC has approved similar alternatives which were limited to a maximum leakage rate of 5 gpm (e.g., see ADAMS Accession No. ML15070A428). | |||
Revise the proposed alternative to include a maximum leakage rate for which Code Case N-513-4 will be used. Explain how the proposed maximum leakage rate is adequate to ensure defense-in-depth is maintained and that adverse consequences are minimized. | Revise the proposed alternative to include a maximum leakage rate for which Code Case N-513-4 will be used. Explain how the proposed maximum leakage rate is adequate to ensure defense-in-depth is maintained and that adverse consequences are minimized. | ||
1NRR-PMDAPEm | 1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Purnell, Blake Sent:Friday, May 20, 2016 8:59 AM To:Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc) | ||
(thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com) | |||
Cc:Gudger, David T:(GenCo-Nuc) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Exelon Generation Company, LLC - Fleet Relief Request to use Code Case N-513-4 (CAC Nos. MF7301 - MF7322)Attachments:Exelon Code Case N-513-4 RAI.pdfMr. Loomis: | Exelon Generation Company, LLC - Fleet Relief Request to use Code Case N-513-4 (CAC Nos. MF7301 - MF7322) | ||
Attachments: | |||
Exelon Code Case N-513-4 RAI.pdfMr. Loomis: | |||
By application dated January 28, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16029A003), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) submitted a request in accordance with Paragraph 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) for a proposed alternative to the requirements of Section XI, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code) for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Limerick Generation Station, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2; R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant; and Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The proposed alternative would allow the licensee to use ASME Code Case N 513-4, "Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping section XI, Division 1," for the evaluation and temporary acceptance of flaws in moderate energy Class 2 and 3 piping in lieu of specified ASME Code requirements. | |||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the application and determined that additional information is needed for the staff to complete its review. Provide a response to the attached request for additional information within 30 days. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-1380. | |||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
Blake Purnell, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission DOCKET NOS. STN 50-456, STN 50-457, STN 50-454, STN 50-455, 50-317, 50-318, 50-461, 50-237, 50-249, 50-373, 50-374, 50-352, 50-353, 50-220, 50-410, 50-219, 50-277, 50-278, 50-254, 50-265, 50-244, AND 50-289 Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA | Blake Purnell, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
DOCKET NOS. STN 50-456, STN 50-457, STN 50-454, STN 50-455, 50-317, 50-318, 50-461, 50-237, 50-249, 50-373, 50-374, 50-352, 50-353, 50-220, 50-410, 50-219, 50-277, 50-278, 50-254, 50-265, 50-244, AND 50-289 Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2856 Mail Envelope Properties (Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov20160520085800) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Exelon Generation Company, LLC - Fleet Relief Request to use Code Case N-513-4 (CAC Nos. MF7301 - MF7322) Sent Date: 5/20/2016 8:58:45 AM Received Date: 5/20/2016 8:58:00 AM | Exelon Generation Company, LLC - Fleet Relief Request to use Code Case N-513-4 (CAC Nos. MF7301 - MF7322) Sent Date: 5/20/2016 8:58:45 AM Received Date: 5/20/2016 8:58:00 AM From: Purnell, Blake Created By: Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov Recipients: "Gudger, David T:(GenCo-Nuc)" <David.Gudger@exeloncorp.com> Tracking Status: None "Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc) (thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com)" <thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2165 5/20/2016 8:58:00 AM Exelon Code Case N-513-4 RAI.pdf 78190 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: | ||
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE TO USE ASME CODE CASE N-789 BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; BYRON STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2; CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2; CLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1; DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3; LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION; PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3; QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; AND THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1. | ||
Ginna Nuclear Power Plant; and Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The proposed alternative would allow the licensee to use ASME Code Case N-513-4, "Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping section XI, Division 1," for the evaluation and temporary acceptance of flaws in moderate energy Class 2 and 3 piping in lieu of specified ASME Code requirements. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the application and determined that the following information is needed for the staff to complete its review. | EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC DOCKET NOS. STN 50-456, STN 50-457, STN 50-454, STN 50-455, 50-317, 50-318, 50-461, 50-237, 50-249, 50-373, 50-374, 50-352, 50-353, 50-220, 50-410, 50-219, 50-277, 50-278, 50-254, 50-265, 50-244, AND 50-289 By application dated January 28, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16029A003), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) submitted a request in accordance with Paragraph 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) for a proposed alternative to the requirements of Section XI, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code) for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Limerick Generation Station, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2; R. E. | ||
Ginna Nuclear Power Plant; and Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The proposed alternative would allow the licensee to use ASME Code Case N-513-4, "Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping section XI, Division 1," for the evaluation and temporary acceptance of flaws in moderate energy Class 2 and 3 piping in lieu of specified ASME Code requirements. | |||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the application and determined that the following information is needed for the staff to complete its review. | |||
RAI-1 Code Case N-513-4 provides criteria which would allow the licensee to accept flaws, including through-wall flaws, in moderate energy Class 2 or 3 piping including elbows, bent pipe, reducers, expanders, and branch tees, without performing a repair or replacement activity for a limited time, not to exceed the next schedule refueling outage. Paragraph 1(f) states: | |||
The provisions of this Case demonstrate the integrity of the item and not the consequences of leakage. It is the responsibility of the Owner to consider effects of leakage in demonstrating system operability and performing plant flooding analyses. | |||
The proposed alternative does not specify a maximum leakage rate for which the alternative may be used. Through operating experience and information provided in other relief requests, the NRC staff has identified cases where leak rates increased from drops per minute to gallons per minute (gpm) before the next refueling schedule. Based on this, the staff requires additional information regarding the management of leakage and the possibility of large leak rates which can erode defense-in-depth and lead to adverse consequences. The NRC has approved similar alternatives which were limited to a maximum leakage rate of 5 gpm (e.g., see ADAMS Accession No. ML15070A428). | |||
Revise the proposed alternative to include a maximum leakage rate for which Code Case N-513-4 will be used. Explain how the proposed maximum leakage rate is adequate to ensure defense-in-depth is maintained and that adverse consequences are minimized.}} | Revise the proposed alternative to include a maximum leakage rate for which Code Case N-513-4 will be used. Explain how the proposed maximum leakage rate is adequate to ensure defense-in-depth is maintained and that adverse consequences are minimized.}} |
Revision as of 07:28, 30 June 2018
ML16144A006 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Peach Bottom, Nine Mile Point, Oyster Creek, Byron, Three Mile Island, Braidwood, Limerick, Ginna, Clinton, Quad Cities, LaSalle |
Issue date: | 05/20/2016 |
From: | Purnell B A Plant Licensing Branch III |
To: | Loomis T R Exelon Corp |
References | |
MF7301, MF7302, MF7303, MF7304, MF7305, MF7306, MF7307-MF7322 | |
Download: ML16144A006 (4) | |
Text
1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Purnell, Blake Sent:Friday, May 20, 2016 8:59 AM To:Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc)
(thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com)
Cc:Gudger, David T:(GenCo-Nuc)
Subject:
Exelon Generation Company, LLC - Fleet Relief Request to use Code Case N-513-4 (CAC Nos. MF7301 - MF7322)
Attachments:
Exelon Code Case N-513-4 RAI.pdfMr. Loomis:
By application dated January 28, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16029A003), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) submitted a request in accordance with Paragraph 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) for a proposed alternative to the requirements of Section XI, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code) for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Limerick Generation Station, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2; R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant; and Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The proposed alternative would allow the licensee to use ASME Code Case N 513-4, "Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping section XI, Division 1," for the evaluation and temporary acceptance of flaws in moderate energy Class 2 and 3 piping in lieu of specified ASME Code requirements.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the application and determined that additional information is needed for the staff to complete its review. Provide a response to the attached request for additional information within 30 days. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-1380.
Sincerely,
Blake Purnell, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
DOCKET NOS. STN 50-456, STN 50-457, STN 50-454, STN 50-455, 50-317, 50-318, 50-461, 50-237, 50-249, 50-373, 50-374, 50-352, 50-353, 50-220, 50-410, 50-219, 50-277, 50-278, 50-254, 50-265, 50-244, AND 50-289 Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2856 Mail Envelope Properties (Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov20160520085800)
Subject:
Exelon Generation Company, LLC - Fleet Relief Request to use Code Case N-513-4 (CAC Nos. MF7301 - MF7322) Sent Date: 5/20/2016 8:58:45 AM Received Date: 5/20/2016 8:58:00 AM From: Purnell, Blake Created By: Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov Recipients: "Gudger, David T:(GenCo-Nuc)" <David.Gudger@exeloncorp.com> Tracking Status: None "Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc) (thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com)" <thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2165 5/20/2016 8:58:00 AM Exelon Code Case N-513-4 RAI.pdf 78190 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE TO USE ASME CODE CASE N-789 BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; BYRON STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2; CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2; CLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1; DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3; LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION; PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3; QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; AND THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1.
EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC DOCKET NOS. STN 50-456, STN 50-457, STN 50-454, STN 50-455, 50-317, 50-318, 50-461, 50-237, 50-249, 50-373, 50-374, 50-352, 50-353, 50-220, 50-410, 50-219, 50-277, 50-278, 50-254, 50-265, 50-244, AND 50-289 By application dated January 28, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16029A003), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) submitted a request in accordance with Paragraph 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) for a proposed alternative to the requirements of Section XI, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code) for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Limerick Generation Station, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2; R. E.
Ginna Nuclear Power Plant; and Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The proposed alternative would allow the licensee to use ASME Code Case N-513-4, "Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping section XI, Division 1," for the evaluation and temporary acceptance of flaws in moderate energy Class 2 and 3 piping in lieu of specified ASME Code requirements.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the application and determined that the following information is needed for the staff to complete its review.
RAI-1 Code Case N-513-4 provides criteria which would allow the licensee to accept flaws, including through-wall flaws, in moderate energy Class 2 or 3 piping including elbows, bent pipe, reducers, expanders, and branch tees, without performing a repair or replacement activity for a limited time, not to exceed the next schedule refueling outage. Paragraph 1(f) states:
The provisions of this Case demonstrate the integrity of the item and not the consequences of leakage. It is the responsibility of the Owner to consider effects of leakage in demonstrating system operability and performing plant flooding analyses.
The proposed alternative does not specify a maximum leakage rate for which the alternative may be used. Through operating experience and information provided in other relief requests, the NRC staff has identified cases where leak rates increased from drops per minute to gallons per minute (gpm) before the next refueling schedule. Based on this, the staff requires additional information regarding the management of leakage and the possibility of large leak rates which can erode defense-in-depth and lead to adverse consequences. The NRC has approved similar alternatives which were limited to a maximum leakage rate of 5 gpm (e.g., see ADAMS Accession No. ML15070A428).
Revise the proposed alternative to include a maximum leakage rate for which Code Case N-513-4 will be used. Explain how the proposed maximum leakage rate is adequate to ensure defense-in-depth is maintained and that adverse consequences are minimized.
1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Purnell, Blake Sent:Friday, May 20, 2016 8:59 AM To:Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc)
(thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com)
Cc:Gudger, David T:(GenCo-Nuc)
Subject:
Exelon Generation Company, LLC - Fleet Relief Request to use Code Case N-513-4 (CAC Nos. MF7301 - MF7322)
Attachments:
Exelon Code Case N-513-4 RAI.pdfMr. Loomis:
By application dated January 28, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16029A003), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) submitted a request in accordance with Paragraph 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) for a proposed alternative to the requirements of Section XI, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code) for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Limerick Generation Station, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2; R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant; and Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The proposed alternative would allow the licensee to use ASME Code Case N 513-4, "Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping section XI, Division 1," for the evaluation and temporary acceptance of flaws in moderate energy Class 2 and 3 piping in lieu of specified ASME Code requirements.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the application and determined that additional information is needed for the staff to complete its review. Provide a response to the attached request for additional information within 30 days. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-1380.
Sincerely,
Blake Purnell, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
DOCKET NOS. STN 50-456, STN 50-457, STN 50-454, STN 50-455, 50-317, 50-318, 50-461, 50-237, 50-249, 50-373, 50-374, 50-352, 50-353, 50-220, 50-410, 50-219, 50-277, 50-278, 50-254, 50-265, 50-244, AND 50-289 Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2856 Mail Envelope Properties (Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov20160520085800)
Subject:
Exelon Generation Company, LLC - Fleet Relief Request to use Code Case N-513-4 (CAC Nos. MF7301 - MF7322) Sent Date: 5/20/2016 8:58:45 AM Received Date: 5/20/2016 8:58:00 AM From: Purnell, Blake Created By: Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov Recipients: "Gudger, David T:(GenCo-Nuc)" <David.Gudger@exeloncorp.com> Tracking Status: None "Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc) (thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com)" <thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2165 5/20/2016 8:58:00 AM Exelon Code Case N-513-4 RAI.pdf 78190 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE TO USE ASME CODE CASE N-789 BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; BYRON STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2; CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2; CLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1; DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3; LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION; PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3; QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; AND THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1.
EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC DOCKET NOS. STN 50-456, STN 50-457, STN 50-454, STN 50-455, 50-317, 50-318, 50-461, 50-237, 50-249, 50-373, 50-374, 50-352, 50-353, 50-220, 50-410, 50-219, 50-277, 50-278, 50-254, 50-265, 50-244, AND 50-289 By application dated January 28, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16029A003), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee) submitted a request in accordance with Paragraph 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) for a proposed alternative to the requirements of Section XI, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code) for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Limerick Generation Station, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2; R. E.
Ginna Nuclear Power Plant; and Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The proposed alternative would allow the licensee to use ASME Code Case N-513-4, "Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping section XI, Division 1," for the evaluation and temporary acceptance of flaws in moderate energy Class 2 and 3 piping in lieu of specified ASME Code requirements.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the application and determined that the following information is needed for the staff to complete its review.
RAI-1 Code Case N-513-4 provides criteria which would allow the licensee to accept flaws, including through-wall flaws, in moderate energy Class 2 or 3 piping including elbows, bent pipe, reducers, expanders, and branch tees, without performing a repair or replacement activity for a limited time, not to exceed the next schedule refueling outage. Paragraph 1(f) states:
The provisions of this Case demonstrate the integrity of the item and not the consequences of leakage. It is the responsibility of the Owner to consider effects of leakage in demonstrating system operability and performing plant flooding analyses.
The proposed alternative does not specify a maximum leakage rate for which the alternative may be used. Through operating experience and information provided in other relief requests, the NRC staff has identified cases where leak rates increased from drops per minute to gallons per minute (gpm) before the next refueling schedule. Based on this, the staff requires additional information regarding the management of leakage and the possibility of large leak rates which can erode defense-in-depth and lead to adverse consequences. The NRC has approved similar alternatives which were limited to a maximum leakage rate of 5 gpm (e.g., see ADAMS Accession No. ML15070A428).
Revise the proposed alternative to include a maximum leakage rate for which Code Case N-513-4 will be used. Explain how the proposed maximum leakage rate is adequate to ensure defense-in-depth is maintained and that adverse consequences are minimized.