ML14267A069: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| page count = 8 | | page count = 8 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:-George GellrichExelon Generation Site Vice PresidentCalvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant1650 Calvert Cliffs ParkwayLusby, MD 20657410 495 5200 Office717 497 3463 Mobilewww.exeloncorp.comgeorge.gellrich@exeloncorp.com10 CFR 50.7110 CFR 54.37(b)September 19, 2014U. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionATTN: Document Control DeskWashington, DC 20555Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-53 and DPR-69NRC Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318 | |||
==Subject:== | |||
Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 47Enclosed for your use is one copy (CD) of our Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR),Revision 47. This revision is submitted within six months after the latest refueling outage inaccordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e).The List of Effective pages are included. This electronic copy is a complete revision.Attachment (1) provides a description of changes to commitments made to the NuclearRegulatory Commission.Attachment (2) contains the report describing how newly identified items are managed for agingeffects.There are no new regulatory commitments contained in this correspondence.Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Douglas E. Lauver at(410) 495-5219.Respectfully,George H. GellrichSite Vice President Document Control DeskSeptember 19, 2014Page 2CERTIFICATION:I, George H. Gellrich, certify that I am Vice President-Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC,and that the information contained in this submittal accurately presents changes made since theprevious submittal, necessary to reflect information and analyses submitted to the Commissionor prepared pursuant to Commission requirement.GHG/BJD/bjdAttachments: (1) Changes to Commitments Made to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission(2) Report Consistent with 10 CFR 54.37(b) on How Aging Effects for Newly-Identified Structures, Systems, or Components are Managed | |||
==Enclosure:== | |||
Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 47 (CD)cc: NRC Project Manager, Calvert Cliffs(Without Enclosure)NRC Regional Administrator, Region INRC Resident Inspector, Calvert CliffsS. Gray, MD-DNR ATTACHMENT (1)CHANGES TO COMMITMENTS MADE TOTHE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONCalvert Cliffs Nuclear Power PlantSeptember 19, 2014 ATTACHMENT (1)CHANGES TO COMMITMENTS MADE TO THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONCalvert Cliffs has changed the following commitments made to the Nuclear RegulatoryCommission (NRC):Commitment:Change:Justification:Commitment:Change:Justification:UFSAR Chapter 16 Table 16-2 line item #18 directs inspection of thecontainment emergency sump for corrosion.Delete line item #18 inspection of the containment emergency sump cover anddebris screen for general corrosion.The original emergency containment sump cover was constructed of steel thatwas subject to general corrosion. Inspecting the containment emergency sumpcover and debris screen for general corrosion was credited with managing thisdegradation mechanism. The emergency containment sump cover and debrisscreens were replaced with stainless steel -by ES199502396, Work OrdersC1 19971659 & C21219963827. As a result, general corrosion is no longer acredible aging mechanism. See SE00138 (50.59 evaluation).An aging management program relied on several Operations, for discovery ofconditions that could allow general corrosion to progress for the instrument linesupports by performance of visual inspections of plant operating areas duringplant operator rounds. The purpose of this program is to provide requirementsand guidance on personnel accountability for the correction of housekeeping,material and radiological deficiencies.These Operations procedures are deleted from UFSAR Table 16-2 Lines 7 and156.Several procedures were credited to assess the condition of componentsupports, specifically looking for general corrosion. However, these proceduresnever looked for corrosion or any other aging degradation mechanism. Thepurpose of these procedures is to look for deficiencies or plant abnormalitiessuch as pooled water, leak, loose brackets, irregular temperatures, etc., todocument the deficiency found, and to hold the spa e owner accountable forcorrecting the housekeeping issue. Instead, the licensee will credit theStructures and Systems Walkdown Program (AMBD-0052), which actuallyinspects for the applicable, plausible aging mechanisms for the same componentsupports. Under AMBD-0052, the walkdowns will not be as frequent as the dailyOPS walkdowns; however, with the intent of aging management to monitor forplausible ARDMs prior to degrading the SSC function, these less frequentinspections will not negatively affect the safety of the plant.Since all of the component supports discussed above are alreadyinspected/monitored under other aging management programs, there is no needto rely on the Operations Procedures. All of these AMPs now being credited aresufficient by themselves to detect ARDMs in time to take corrective action.1 ATTACHMENT (2)REPORT CONSISTENT WITH 10 CFR 54.37(b) ON HOW AGINGEFFECTS FOR NEWLY-IDENTIFIED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, ORCOMPONENTS ARE MANAGEDCalvert Cliffs Nuclear Power PlantSeptember 19, 2014 ATTACHMENT (2)REPORT CONSISTENT WITH 10 CFR 54.37(b) ON HOW AGING EFFECTS FOR NEWLY-IDENTIFIED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, OR COMPONENTS ARE MANAGEDThis report is in lieu of adding a level of detail to the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant(CCNPP) Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) that is greater than in the remainderof the UFSAR, including the License Renewal Supplement. An entry on the Nuclear RegulatoryCommission (NRC) website, "Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About License RenewalInspection Procedure (IP) 71003, 'Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal"' relatesto the amount of detail required per 10 CFR 54.37(b). It states, "The NRC staff will consider itacceptable if the summary information included in the FSAR update is consistent with therequirements of 10 CFR 54.21(d), and the guidance provided in Revision 1 of NUREG-1800,'Standard Review Plan for Review of License Renewal Applications for Nuclear Power Plants'(SRP-LR), provided that the licensee has supplied the technical details (as described in RIS2007-16) in another documented submittal to the NRC." The information in this report isconsistent with the technical information previously submitted to the NRC with the LicenseRenewal Application (LRA).On April 8, 1998 CCNPP submitted a LRA to the NRC to renew the operating licenses forCCNPP Units 1 and 2 for an additional 20 years beyond the original expiration dates of July 31,2014 (Unit 1) and August 13, 2016 (Unit 2). Within the LRA, information was provided to definethe component types, functions, and the Aging Management Programs that applied. Lists ofindividual components within the scope of license renewal were not required to be provided.Subsequent to the completion of the necessary reviews, audits, responses to Requests forAdditional Information, and resolutions of other questions, the NRC published NUREG-1705,Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 and 2 in December of 1999, which documented the NRC staffs review of the informationsubmitted to them through July 16, 1999. The renewed operating licenses for CCNPP 1 andCCNPP 2 were issued on March 23, 2000, extending the license for CCNPP 1 to July 31, 2034and CCNPP 2 to August 13, 2036.For holders of a renewed operating license, 10 CFR 54.37(b) requires that newly-identifiedstructures, systems, or components (SSCs) be included in the Final Safety Analysis Report(FSAR) update required by 10 CFR 50.71(e) describing how the effects of aging will bemanaged. Newly-identified SSCs are those SSCs that were installed in the plant at the time ofLicense Renewal of CCNPP 1 and CCNPP 2, but were not evaluated as part of the LRA (asdiscussed in Regulatory Issue Summary 2007-16).During the period of April 2013 to April 2014, a review of the site component database identifiedapproximately 7000 components installed before April 2, 1999 that may not have previouslybeen screened for license renewal applicability.Of the components that were identified as in-scope and subject to aging management review,239 components were found to have not been addressed by the LRA and are, therefore, "newlyidentified" and subject to 10 CFR 54.37(b) reporting requirements. The 239 components can bebroken down into two groups. The first group of 237 is already addressed within the groups ofdevice types submitted with the LRA. The second group consists of 2 components that wouldnot have been addressed under any of the groups of device types in the LRA.The 239 "newly-identified" components have been evaluated for aging effects requiringmanagement and those with such aging have been assigned to existing Aging ManagementPrograms and appropriate aging management strategies have been invoked to adequately1 ATTACHMENT (2)REPORT CONSISTENT WITH 10 CFR 54.37(b) ON HOW AGING EFFECTS FOR NEWLY-IDENTIFIED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, OR COMPONENTS ARE MANAGEDdetect and manage the applicable aging effects throughout the period of extended operation.This can be verified by NRC inspection.The CCNPP LRA was the first submitted to the NRC and the guidance currently available toapplicants in the GALL Report (NUREG-1801) and the SRP (NUREG-1800) did not exist.Hence, the format of the CCNPP LRA does not align with what later applicants submitted.Although the tables and discussion provided in the CCNPP LRA are not actually being revised,the attached tables show, in a format similar to what current LRAs would contain, how aging ofthe 2 newly-identified components would have been addressed, had these components beenincluded in the LRA.Time-Limited Agina AnalysisOne new Time-Limited Aging Analysis was identified for CCNPP in association with aligning theCCNPP AMP for reactor vessel internals with industry guidance and GALL XI.M16A. The Time-Limited Aging Analysis addresses fatigue of reactor vessel internals in accordance with theguidance of MRP-227A. Details of these analyses were reviewed at CCNPP by NRC Region 1Inspectors during the Phase 2, IP71003, Post-Approval Inspection performed during the weeksof May 19th, June 2nd, and July 7th 2014.2 ATTACHMENT (2)REPORT CONSISTENT WITH 10 CFR 54.37(b) ON HOW AGING EFFECTS FOR NEWLY-IDENTIFIED STRUCTURES,SYSTEMS, OR COMPONENTS ARE MANAGEDCCNPP Control Room HVAC System -LRA Section 5.1 IC(2 Components)Component Intended Aging Effect Requiring Aging NUREG-1801 Table 1Type Function Material Environment Management Management Vol 2 Item ItemProgramSolenoid PB Copper Dry Air None N/A VII.J.AP-8Valve Alloy I I I I I I1}} |
Revision as of 15:00, 26 June 2018
ML14267A069 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Calvert Cliffs ![]() |
Issue date: | 09/19/2014 |
From: | Gellrich G H Exelon Generation Co |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
Download: ML14267A069 (8) | |
Text
-George GellrichExelon Generation Site Vice PresidentCalvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant1650 Calvert Cliffs ParkwayLusby, MD 20657410 495 5200 Office717 497 3463 Mobilewww.exeloncorp.comgeorge.gellrich@exeloncorp.com10 CFR 50.7110 CFR 54.37(b)September 19, 2014U. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionATTN: Document Control DeskWashington, DC 20555Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-53 and DPR-69NRC Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318
Subject:
Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 47Enclosed for your use is one copy (CD) of our Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR),Revision 47. This revision is submitted within six months after the latest refueling outage inaccordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e).The List of Effective pages are included. This electronic copy is a complete revision.Attachment (1) provides a description of changes to commitments made to the NuclearRegulatory Commission.Attachment (2) contains the report describing how newly identified items are managed for agingeffects.There are no new regulatory commitments contained in this correspondence.Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Douglas E. Lauver at(410) 495-5219.Respectfully,George H. GellrichSite Vice President Document Control DeskSeptember 19, 2014Page 2CERTIFICATION:I, George H. Gellrich, certify that I am Vice President-Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC,and that the information contained in this submittal accurately presents changes made since theprevious submittal, necessary to reflect information and analyses submitted to the Commissionor prepared pursuant to Commission requirement.GHG/BJD/bjdAttachments: (1) Changes to Commitments Made to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission(2) Report Consistent with 10 CFR 54.37(b) on How Aging Effects for Newly-Identified Structures, Systems, or Components are Managed
Enclosure:
Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 47 (CD)cc: NRC Project Manager, Calvert Cliffs(Without Enclosure)NRC Regional Administrator, Region INRC Resident Inspector, Calvert CliffsS. Gray, MD-DNR ATTACHMENT (1)CHANGES TO COMMITMENTS MADE TOTHE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONCalvert Cliffs Nuclear Power PlantSeptember 19, 2014 ATTACHMENT (1)CHANGES TO COMMITMENTS MADE TO THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONCalvert Cliffs has changed the following commitments made to the Nuclear RegulatoryCommission (NRC):Commitment:Change:Justification:Commitment:Change:Justification:UFSAR Chapter 16 Table 16-2 line item #18 directs inspection of thecontainment emergency sump for corrosion.Delete line item #18 inspection of the containment emergency sump cover anddebris screen for general corrosion.The original emergency containment sump cover was constructed of steel thatwas subject to general corrosion. Inspecting the containment emergency sumpcover and debris screen for general corrosion was credited with managing thisdegradation mechanism. The emergency containment sump cover and debrisscreens were replaced with stainless steel -by ES199502396, Work OrdersC1 19971659 & C21219963827. As a result, general corrosion is no longer acredible aging mechanism. See SE00138 (50.59 evaluation).An aging management program relied on several Operations, for discovery ofconditions that could allow general corrosion to progress for the instrument linesupports by performance of visual inspections of plant operating areas duringplant operator rounds. The purpose of this program is to provide requirementsand guidance on personnel accountability for the correction of housekeeping,material and radiological deficiencies.These Operations procedures are deleted from UFSAR Table 16-2 Lines 7 and156.Several procedures were credited to assess the condition of componentsupports, specifically looking for general corrosion. However, these proceduresnever looked for corrosion or any other aging degradation mechanism. Thepurpose of these procedures is to look for deficiencies or plant abnormalitiessuch as pooled water, leak, loose brackets, irregular temperatures, etc., todocument the deficiency found, and to hold the spa e owner accountable forcorrecting the housekeeping issue. Instead, the licensee will credit theStructures and Systems Walkdown Program (AMBD-0052), which actuallyinspects for the applicable, plausible aging mechanisms for the same componentsupports. Under AMBD-0052, the walkdowns will not be as frequent as the dailyOPS walkdowns; however, with the intent of aging management to monitor forplausible ARDMs prior to degrading the SSC function, these less frequentinspections will not negatively affect the safety of the plant.Since all of the component supports discussed above are alreadyinspected/monitored under other aging management programs, there is no needto rely on the Operations Procedures. All of these AMPs now being credited aresufficient by themselves to detect ARDMs in time to take corrective action.1 ATTACHMENT (2)REPORT CONSISTENT WITH 10 CFR 54.37(b) ON HOW AGINGEFFECTS FOR NEWLY-IDENTIFIED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, ORCOMPONENTS ARE MANAGEDCalvert Cliffs Nuclear Power PlantSeptember 19, 2014 ATTACHMENT (2)REPORT CONSISTENT WITH 10 CFR 54.37(b) ON HOW AGING EFFECTS FOR NEWLY-IDENTIFIED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, OR COMPONENTS ARE MANAGEDThis report is in lieu of adding a level of detail to the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant(CCNPP) Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) that is greater than in the remainderof the UFSAR, including the License Renewal Supplement. An entry on the Nuclear RegulatoryCommission (NRC) website, "Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About License RenewalInspection Procedure (IP) 71003, 'Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal"' relatesto the amount of detail required per 10 CFR 54.37(b). It states, "The NRC staff will consider itacceptable if the summary information included in the FSAR update is consistent with therequirements of 10 CFR 54.21(d), and the guidance provided in Revision 1 of NUREG-1800,'Standard Review Plan for Review of License Renewal Applications for Nuclear Power Plants'(SRP-LR), provided that the licensee has supplied the technical details (as described in RIS2007-16) in another documented submittal to the NRC." The information in this report isconsistent with the technical information previously submitted to the NRC with the LicenseRenewal Application (LRA).On April 8, 1998 CCNPP submitted a LRA to the NRC to renew the operating licenses forCCNPP Units 1 and 2 for an additional 20 years beyond the original expiration dates of July 31,2014 (Unit 1) and August 13, 2016 (Unit 2). Within the LRA, information was provided to definethe component types, functions, and the Aging Management Programs that applied. Lists ofindividual components within the scope of license renewal were not required to be provided.Subsequent to the completion of the necessary reviews, audits, responses to Requests forAdditional Information, and resolutions of other questions, the NRC published NUREG-1705,Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 and 2 in December of 1999, which documented the NRC staffs review of the informationsubmitted to them through July 16, 1999. The renewed operating licenses for CCNPP 1 andCCNPP 2 were issued on March 23, 2000, extending the license for CCNPP 1 to July 31, 2034and CCNPP 2 to August 13, 2036.For holders of a renewed operating license, 10 CFR 54.37(b) requires that newly-identifiedstructures, systems, or components (SSCs) be included in the Final Safety Analysis Report(FSAR) update required by 10 CFR 50.71(e) describing how the effects of aging will bemanaged. Newly-identified SSCs are those SSCs that were installed in the plant at the time ofLicense Renewal of CCNPP 1 and CCNPP 2, but were not evaluated as part of the LRA (asdiscussed in Regulatory Issue Summary 2007-16).During the period of April 2013 to April 2014, a review of the site component database identifiedapproximately 7000 components installed before April 2, 1999 that may not have previouslybeen screened for license renewal applicability.Of the components that were identified as in-scope and subject to aging management review,239 components were found to have not been addressed by the LRA and are, therefore, "newlyidentified" and subject to 10 CFR 54.37(b) reporting requirements. The 239 components can bebroken down into two groups. The first group of 237 is already addressed within the groups ofdevice types submitted with the LRA. The second group consists of 2 components that wouldnot have been addressed under any of the groups of device types in the LRA.The 239 "newly-identified" components have been evaluated for aging effects requiringmanagement and those with such aging have been assigned to existing Aging ManagementPrograms and appropriate aging management strategies have been invoked to adequately1 ATTACHMENT (2)REPORT CONSISTENT WITH 10 CFR 54.37(b) ON HOW AGING EFFECTS FOR NEWLY-IDENTIFIED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, OR COMPONENTS ARE MANAGEDdetect and manage the applicable aging effects throughout the period of extended operation.This can be verified by NRC inspection.The CCNPP LRA was the first submitted to the NRC and the guidance currently available toapplicants in the GALL Report (NUREG-1801) and the SRP (NUREG-1800) did not exist.Hence, the format of the CCNPP LRA does not align with what later applicants submitted.Although the tables and discussion provided in the CCNPP LRA are not actually being revised,the attached tables show, in a format similar to what current LRAs would contain, how aging ofthe 2 newly-identified components would have been addressed, had these components beenincluded in the LRA.Time-Limited Agina AnalysisOne new Time-Limited Aging Analysis was identified for CCNPP in association with aligning theCCNPP AMP for reactor vessel internals with industry guidance and GALL XI.M16A. The Time-Limited Aging Analysis addresses fatigue of reactor vessel internals in accordance with theguidance of MRP-227A. Details of these analyses were reviewed at CCNPP by NRC Region 1Inspectors during the Phase 2, IP71003, Post-Approval Inspection performed during the weeksof May 19th, June 2nd, and July 7th 2014.2 ATTACHMENT (2)REPORT CONSISTENT WITH 10 CFR 54.37(b) ON HOW AGING EFFECTS FOR NEWLY-IDENTIFIED STRUCTURES,SYSTEMS, OR COMPONENTS ARE MANAGEDCCNPP Control Room HVAC System -LRA Section 5.1 IC(2 Components)Component Intended Aging Effect Requiring Aging NUREG-1801 Table 1Type Function Material Environment Management Management Vol 2 Item ItemProgramSolenoid PB Copper Dry Air None N/A VII.J.AP-8Valve Alloy I I I I I I1