ML17055B517

Rev 4 to Administrative Procedure AP-2.0, Production & Control of Procedures

ML17055B517
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	03/10/1986
From:	Abbott R, Perkins T, Roman T NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML17055B512	List: ML17055B511 ML17055B513 ML17055B515 ML17055B517 ML17055B520 ML17055B522 ML17055B524 ML17055B525 ML17055B527 ML17055B528 ML17055B530 ML17055B532 ML17055B533 ML17055B534 ML17055B535 ML17055B537 ML17055B538 ML17055B539 ML17055B540 ML17055B541 ML17055B542 ML17055B543 ML17055B544 ML17055B546 ML17055B547 ML17055B549 ML18038A154
References
AP-2.0, NUDOCS 8604280269
Download: ML17055B517 (74)

Text

NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION ADMINISTRATIVEPROCEDURE PROCEDURE NO ~ AP-2 ~ 0 PRODUCTION AND CONTROL OF PROCEDURES DATE AND INITIALS APPROVALS SIGNATURES Station Superintendent NMPNS Unit 1 T ~ W. Roman Station Superintendent NMPNS Unit 2'

~ B. Abbott General SnperinR~R Nuclear Gen T

J Per Qu surance Concurrence Manager Quality Assurance-Nuclear W ~ A. Hansen u'2 REVISION 2 REVISION 3 REVISION 4 r/~/IG

</>/&

r4~/rs-7 8

Summar of Pa es Revision 4

Effective 3/10/86

)

Plane Date 6

December 1984 i,ii,1,2,4-5, I

7-14, 17-'22, 26-32.June 1985 (Reissue) 33-34 June 1985 3

December 1985 23-25 January 1986 15, 16 March 1986 NIAGARA MOHAWR POWER CORPORATION THIS PROCEDURE NOT TO BE USED AFTER iifARCH'1988 SUBJECT TO PERIODIC REVIEWS Sb042802b9 Sb04i5 PDR

'ADOCK 05000410 P

~

PDR

J

~ j'

AP-2 PRODUCTION AND CONTROL OF PROCEDURES Table of Contents Secclcc 1.0 1'icle PURPOSE 2.0 SCOPE 3.0 3,1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.0 4,1 4.2 4.3 4,4 4,5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4,9 4.10 4.11 4el2 4.13 4.14 4.14,1 4.14.2 4.15 4 16 4.17 4.18 4.19 4.20 5.0 6.0 6.1 6.2 GENERATION OF PROCEDURES Site Pxocedures Unit or Station Pzocedures Procedures by Off Site Organizations Site Department Procedures MAJOR PROCEDURE PROGRA16 Admd,nistrative Procedures Emergency Plan and Proceduxes Security Plan and Procedures Operating Proceduxes Special Procedures Surveillance Procedures Tests aad Inspections (Preveative Maintenance)

Maintenance Px'oceduxes (Corrective Maintenance)

Radiation Protection Procedures Reactor Aaalyst Procedures Fuel Handling Procedures Pre~perational and Start-Up Pxocedures Supervisory Procedures Operating Orders and Special Orders Standing Orders Special Orders Pire Protection Procedures Environmental Proceduxes Waste Handling Procedures Office Procedures Modification Procedures Iaservice Inspection Procedures PROCEDURE FORMAT REVIEW OF PROCEDURES The Revievers Procedure fox'eviewers 1

1 2

2 2

2 2

2 3

3 3

3 4

5 5

5 6

6 6

6 7

7 7

7 7

9 9

10 7.0 7.1 APPROVAL OF PROCEDURES Pex'sons Designated to Appz'ove Procedures Ll 11-14 AP-2 -i June 1985 (REISSUE)

AP-2 PRODUCTION AND CONTROL OF PROCEDURES Table of Contents Continue Section 8.0 9.0 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.2+1 10.2.2 10.2.3 10.2.4 10.3 10.3+i 10.3.2 10.3+3 11.0 Il.l 11 2 11 2.1 11.2.2 11.2+3 11.3 LL 3.1 11 3.2 11.3.3 11,4 11.5 12.0 12.1 12.3 12.4 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.2.1 13.2.2 13.2.3 TEMPORARY PROCEDURES JOINT NYPA AND NMPC PROCEDURES REVISIONS AND TEMPORARY CHANGES TO PROCEDURES Regular Revtsions Temporary'hanges to Procedures Temporary Change Notice Temporary'hange Record Non-compliance of Temporary Change Incorporation of Temporary Change into Procedures Drawing Corrections Change to Conform with 'As Is'onfiguration Maxked Up Drawing Error in Station Configuration PUBLICATION AND MAINTENANCE OP PROCEDURES Production Status Publication Pormat Title Page I

Revisions snd Changes Page Format Index and Numbezing of Procedures Procedure Lists Procedure Indexes Procedure Numbezing Table of Contents Proceduze Piles DISTRXBUTION AND CONTROL OZ PROCEDURES Authorised Holders Control Room Pile Individual or Department Piles PERIODIC REVIEW OP PROCEDURES Purpose Review Accounting and Documentation Documentation of Reviews Schedule of Reviews Assignment for Review

~Pa e 15 16 at 16

. 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 AP-2 -ii June 1985 (REISSUE)

4

AP-2 PRODUCTION AND CONTROL OF PROCEDURES 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure describes the generation,

approval, publication, distribution and control of procedures issued by the Nucleex'eneration Department for the Site st Nine MU.e 'Point.

It shall be effective as of the date noted on the cover page for aLL procedures pertaining 'to Unit 1 snd Unit 2 as noted on the SCOPE following.

2.0 SCOPE The description of the facilities and the specifications for operatioa, maintenance, and testing are included in the Final Safety Analysis Reports for Unit 1 and Unit 2.

Procedures shaLL be produced as required in the Technical Specifications end according to the guidelines provided in ANSI/ANS-3.2-19821, Regulatory Guide 1.33.,

and Appendix B of 10 CFR 50 ~

Procedures shaLl contain all the elemeats listed in the referenced documents which are essential to safety and quality and in addition should incorporate desix'able practices essential to economic and reliable opex'ation.

It is intended that formal procedures establish standexds of practice where such standards ere essential to the

orderly, safe, snd consistent admiaistrstion, operation, testing, and maintenance of the

.station.

Detailed procedures should not be required for staxuiardixed operations, such as how to open or close s valve or manipulate e

switch which come within the scope of universal personnel txsiaiag.

3.0 3.1 THE GENERATION OF PROCEDURES Site Procedures The preparation of Administrative Procedures and other procedures applicable to both Unit 1 and Unit 2 shall be assigned to cognizant Niagara Mohawk engineering or operating personnel or designated consultants by authoxity of the General Superintendent Nuclear Generation.

Excluded are matters delegated exclusively to construction management.

Technical Specifications as of October 1984 require compliance with Sections 5.1 and 5.3 of ANSI N18.7-1972.

Use of ANSI/ANS-3.2-1982 assures this compliance and also provides for compliance with regulations expected 'o be in effect for licensing of Unit 2.

References in this procedure to ANSI/ANS-3.2-1982 may be abbreviated to ANSI/ANS-3.2 or ANS>>3.2.

~

AP-2

-1 June 1985 (REISSUE)

3.2 Unit or Station Procedures The preparation of aLL procedures applicable only to a particular unit at the site wiLL be assigned to site or consultant personnel by either the General Superintendent, Nuclear Generation, or the Station Superintendent.

3.3 Procedures b

Offsite Or animations It shaLL be the responsibility of the site supervisor assigned to contact the department or contzactor supplying services to obtain and review applicable procedures as required.

3.4 Site De rtment Procedures Site department superintendents or supervisors may authorise procedures for the purpose of standardizing wozk functions for which they are responsible and for implementing the more general procedures or orders which-are issued through the authority of the General Superintendent or Station Superintendents.

4.0 MAJOR PROCEDURE PROGRAMS This section contains a

summary of ma)or procedure programs which must be maintained at Nine Mile Point.

Detailed zeferences are included in, the reference and approval matrix included with this AP-2.

(Figure 2.0.1) 4.1 Administrative Procedures The administrative procedures desczibe

the, total program zesponsibility for operation and maintenance of the station.

They define the responsibilities and authorities of the plant staff and include the items Listed under "Rules of Practice" and "Operating Orders" in ANSI/ANS-3.2 and Listed under "Ahhnistrative Procedures" of Appendix A, Regulatory Guide 1.33.

Also included in the scope of the administrative procedures is the implementation of the administrative requirements of Appendix B

LOCPR50 which fa11 within the responsibility of the General Superintendent, Nuc1ear Generation.

4.1.1 Chemical and Radiochemical Control Procedures Written procedures shall describe the methods used for chemical and radiochemical activities as required by Section 5.3.1 ANS 3.2,

1982, and as prescribed in Technical Specifications.

4.2 Emer enc Plan and Procedures Implementing procedures for emergency plan shaLL be in accordance with the section of 5.3.9. 3, ANSI/ANS 3.2 titled "Procedures for Implementing the. Emergency PLan".

AP 2

-2 June 1985 (REISSUE)

Securi Plan and Procedures Procedures for implementing the security plan shall be developed to supp~cut the featuzes and physical barriers designed to control access to the plant f 'nd, as appropriate, to vital areas within the plant.

Infozmation concerning specific design features and administrative provisions of the plant security program shall be confidential snd thus accorded limited distribution.

Refezence ANSI/ANS 3.2 Section 5.2. 9 entitled "Plant Securizy and Visitor Control",

ANSI N18.17-.1973 (kNS-3.3),

"Industrial Security for Nuclear Power Plants",

and 10CFR73.

This security plan and procedures is produced and implemented by the Niagara Mohawk Security Department but is sub)ect to 'annual review by

~ the General Superintendent as stated in section 6.G of Technical

- Specifications.

4,4 rat Procedures Operating proceduzes should include the evolutions and systems listed under "General Plant Operating Procedures" and "Procedures for

Startup, Operating snd Shutdown of Safety~lated 3V Systems" in Regulatory Guide lo33o The general format should be in accordance with Sections 5 3.2, 5.3.3,'nd 5.3.4 of (AS 3.2. 1982) except for the references to fuel handling and process monitoring procedures.

See ~, Sections 4.6 and 4.11.

h special section of each operating procedure should be devoted to procedures for correcting

abnormal, offnozmal> or alarm conditions.

Many of these as 'noted in Regulatozy Guide '1.33 may be included in a manual of annunciator details and responseso 4.5 S

cial Procedures Special Procedures or special operating procedures shall include the evolutions listed in the Regulatory Guide 1.33 under "Procedures for Combating Emergencies and Other Significant Events" ~

These shaLl be produced using, the general guidance provided in Section 5.3. 9, AHS 3.2 1982 under "Emergency Procedures".

4.6 Surveillance Procedures These procedures shall include "Process Monitoring Procedures" as called for in Section 5.3.4.4 of hNS 3.2 and the periodic tests and inspections required by the Technical Specifications and Section 5.3.10, ANS 3.2, 1982.

Suzveillance programs shaU.

be sub~uped according to the department performing the work:

(1)

Operations (2)

Instrument and Control (3)

Radiation Protection (4)

Chemistzy (5)

Electrical Maintenance (6)

Mechanical Maintenance (7)

Reactor Analyst (9)

Pire Protection AP-2

-3 December 1985

4.6 (Ccmt.)

The Listing, frequency aad scheduliag of Surveillance Procedures is covered in administrative Procedure ~.2.

4.7 Tests and Xns ectioas (Preventive Maintenance) k, pxogram describing tests aad inspections or preveative maintenance actioas not specificaILy called fox in Technical Specificatioas but othcarLse deemed important for the statioa operation shaLL be the subject of a

sct of procedures subdivided amoag the station depa~ents tn the same manaer as the suxvciXLancc pzocedures.

4.8 Maintenance Px'ocedures (Corrective Maintenance)

Written procedures are required for performing corrective maintenance on all nuclear safe~elated systems and components.

SkSZIa normally possessed by qm61fied maintenance personnel might not require step by step delineations ia a mitten procedure.

The procedures shall be developed so as to maintain safety-related equipmeat at the quaLity required for it to pex'foxm its intcaded fuactioa and to assure quality at least equivalent to that specified in applicable

codes, bases, standards>

design requirements, materLal specificatioas, and inspection requirements, Sections 5.3.5, AS

3. 2, 1982 should be rcfered to for zcference.

These maintcaumce pxocedux'es shall be divided into two sectioas.

one for electrical and mechanical maintenance; ind thc other for inszzument and, control maiat cnsncc o 4.9 Radiatioa Protection Procedures The Radiatioa Protectioa Proceduzes (zcfercncc Section 5 3.6, hNS 3.2 1982) shaIL describe the methods and rules used to a~mixe the exposure of pexsoanel to radiation sad coatandm~tion.

Zt shall conzain the guides and

Limits, for radiation protection aad contamination control as veil as detailed proceduxes to'help insure that these guides and limixs are not exceeded.

4.10

'Reactor Aaal st Procedures The Reactor Aaalyst with the concurrence of the Supervisor Operations shall develop a

set of instructions ox procedures for use by the

analyst, operators, and technicians ia connection vith management of the reactor cox'e.

These procedures in combination Wth the surveillance procedures of Section 4.6 (b) shsL1 be coordinated to complete the requirements of AS 3.2 Section 5.3.4.4 for reactor core moaitoriag.

kP-2 W

June 1985 (REXSSUE)

Fue1 Hand1i Procedures These procedures define the methods to be used to handle,

store, inspect, and load fuel.

The geaeral outliae and scope of these pxocedures is defined ia Section 5.3'.5 of AS 3.2.

Other evolutions which may take place in the reactor refueling area or spent fuel pool such as those involving contx'ol

blades, flux

monitors, or entzy into closed systems (reactor vesseL) requiriag inventory Logs, iay also be included in the category of fuel hsndliag procedures

~

PreW rational aad Starts Procedures (1)

Startup procedures describe the maaaer ia wnich the initial reactor stertup end power test program shal1 be conducted.

The pzogxam shaLl be planned to permit safe fuel loading and

startup, to increase power in safe incremeats, and to perfoxm ma)or testing at specified power plateaus.

(2)

Premperational or acceptance tests are routinely pexformed on virtually all equipment and systems within a aewly commissioned pleat.

These tests arc functional, operational, or performance tests on each individual piece of equipment or unit system uadez prescribed conditions.

These tests are designed to permit evolution of system performance, including, fox

example, the measurement of flow, temperatuxe,

pressure, response time f end vibration; txansf er power supply to emergency power; and accuracy and xesponse of control devices.

The general scope and format are described under the heading "Premperationa1 Tests" Section 5.2.19.1 ANS 3.2.

Procedures for premperationel tests should also bc prepared for new and xevised systems as they are added to the operating auc1eax'tation.

Premperatioaa1 Tests for Unit 2 wQL be prepaxed and conducted undex the Start-Up and Test Progxam which will pxecede the issue of the Operating License.

Prempcx'ational Test Procedures for Uxd.t 2 will not be prepaxed under these hdadaistrative Proceduxcs imtiL after Unit 2 Construction Project Management has effected a

complete tuznovex to the Hucleax Generation Department.

Su rviso Procedures Procedures which detaiL techniques to be used ia performing ans1ysis, cs1ibration,

sampliag, or

routine, mechanical evo1utioas shall be generated by supervisozs to standa~e wozk techniques and assure uniform format for presentation of results.

When appropriate these proceduzes may be composed essentiaLLy of references to standards and/or established texts and manuals.

The fo11owing sets of proceduxes are examples of this category:

V (1)

Reactor Core Parameter Calculatioa Procedures.

(2)

Instrument Shop Procedures.

(3)

Test Xnstzument Calibration Pzoceduxes.

(4)

Lab Instrument Proceduzes.

~2

-5 June 1985 (BEISSUE)

4.13 (Cont.)

( 5)

Sampling Procedures.

(6)

Counting Room Procedures (7)

Chemical Analytical Procedures.

(8)

Carrier Preparation Procedures'9)

Radiation Protection Technical and Analytical Procedures.

(10) Technical Department Procedures (il) Computez Procedures (12) Secuzity Department Operating Procedures (13)

Sewage Treatment Plant Procedures 4.14 eratin Orders and S ecial Orders Xn general standing orders or standard operating procedures as defined in section 5.2.3 "Operating Orders" of ANS 3.2 are incorporated in the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Administrative Procedures.

4.14.1 Standin Orders

/'.14.2 Orders and instructions may be issued as standing ordezs on subjects which do not involve plant modifications or actions which do not affect the quality of systems or components or on matters which do not require prior technical review before becoming effective.

These orders shall originate with the general superintendent, the plant superintendent, or their authorized alternates, They aze not intended to come within the scope of temporary procedures as defined in the technical specifications.

Special Orders Orders and instructions which encompass special operations, housekeeping, data taking, publications, plotting process parameters, personnel

actions, and other similar matters which are of short term applicability shall be issued as special orders.

Orders and instructions pertaining to plant operations shall be issued on a form marked

"-Station Shift Supervisor Instructions" and shall be approved either by the Operations Supervisor or by the Station Superintendent or a

designated alternate.

Other special orders may be issuea by supervisors as required.

See Section 5.2.4 ANS 3.2.

4.15 Fire Protection Procedures Administrative, Operating, Maintenance, ana Surveillance procedures shall be produced which will implement the Fire Protection Program as required by Technical Specifications.

Only pzocedures which do not fail within the existing categories of normal station operation, maintenance, etc.,

shall be placed in a

separate listing as Fire Protection Procedures.

Procedure format shall be compatible with other comparable procedures.

AP-2

-6 December 1984

Environmental Procedures Administrative, Operating, Maintenance and SurveiLLance pzocedures which implement the Envtzonmental Monitoring section of Technical Specifications shall be produced as required by Technical Specification 5.5.

Procedures which may directly affect the station's environmental impact must be prepared fox review according to Technical Specification 6.5.

Othez procedures may be pxepared as supervisory procedures.

While envixonmental px'oceduxes, as such>

aze not covered in FANS

3. 2, the general fozmat prescribed in that standard shall be used where applicable.

Waste Handlin Procedures Procedures covering the transf er, packaging snd trans port of waste shaLL be produced as required by NRC BuIletin 79-19 Office Procedures Procedures which detail techniques used in performing special and x'outine office functions to standardize work techniques and assure uniform results.

The following sets of procedures fall within this category:

1)

Office Instructions 2)

Document Control Znstxuctions 3)

Document Control Computer Procedures Modifications Procedures Written procedures are required fox'he implementation of changes oz additions to nuclear safety xe1ated systems or components.

These procedures may be produced by site technical personnel, corporate engineering personnel or contractors.

In general it is recommended that content of these pzocedures should follow the format and content of maintenance procedures as outlined in hHS 3.2, Section 5.3.

The procedure for implementing modifications is included in ~.0.

Inservice Ins ction Procedures Written procedures are requixed to outline the progzam for inservice inspections as.called for in the Technical Specifications and to describe the procedure for conduct of that progxam.

Procedures are also required to describe the content and conduct of the requix'ed insezvice inspections.

Procedures may be included as additions to the reguLar test and inspection program ox msy be produced as separate documents.

Tz Procedures Procedures shaLL be maintained and produced by the Superintendent Training which outline the

scope, content and schedule for training for each site department as provided in SP>>9.0 BÃSI/AS-3.1 1981, Regulatory Guide 1.58, LOCFR55'nd the Technical Specifications.

~2

-7 June 1985 (REISSUE)

5.0 PROCEDURE PRODUCTION In general procedures shall be produced in the same form and content as was used in February 1984 except whex'e they may fail to fulfill the requirements in the reference to SNSX K18.7 or ENSIGNS-3.2 which is contained in the curxent Technical Specifications for Unit 1 oz Unit 2.

The approval and reference matrix included with this px'ocedure keys the various procedure elements to the applicable sections of kNSX/SNS 3.2 -. 1982.

Precise adherence to the matrLr is not expected or required,

however, every procedure shall be a concise guide for adherence to Technical Specifications and to the applicable USNRC regulations

- and Regulatory

Guides, MSX Standards, kSME and XEEE Codes, and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation procedures which aze contained in or referred to in the Operating Z1censes.

(See also Sections 13.0 and 14.0) 5.1 411 procedures pertaining to the operation, maintenance, ox'esting of all units at the station must be in accord with the saf ety analysis report for the applicable unit.

authors and reviewers of all procedures shall cex'tify that each px'ocedure does not constitute a

change in proceduxes as described in the facility safety analysis report ox'tate that the procedure does effeet changes in the procedures as descxibed in the safety analysis reports Xf a procedure or proceduze change is deemed to make a

change in procedures as described in the safety analysis

report, the author oz reviewer shsLL obtain a

safety analysis for that procedure in accordance with 10 CFR 50 59.

The safety analysis shsL1 establish that implementation of the procedure shsLl be deemed not to involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in 10 CFR 50.59(a)(2) else the procedure shall not be implemented.

Xf a procedure or procedure change is evaluated by the authors or reviewers and it is determined that it xequires a change in technical specifications or a

change & the facility not described in the safety analysis

report, the pxoc'eduze shall be referred to the Nuclear Engineering and.

Licensing Department for analysis and suitable action.

No implementation shall take place until qualified personnel or consultants in the NEU, department have determined that there is no unreviewed safety

question, change in the facility or change in technical specifications involved.

Otherwise 10 CFR 50.59 (b) and (c) shall apply.

5.2 Production Process Duzing the course of production of a procedure or pxocedure

change, the author(s) may deliver preMniaszy drafts to various persons including Qua1ity Assurance fox comment and may also meet with others in committee to assist in the pzoceduxe production.

This preliminary process need not be documented in detail but the names of persons involved and theix'itles should be included on page 2 of the review E

AP-2

-8 June 1985 (REISSUE)

5' (Coat'd) form Pigure 2.0.4.

The consultation with persoas on the qualified revievezs roster during the pzoductioa process should not preclude these persons from being the independent reviewers vhoee signatures appear oa the reviev fozm.

6.0 REVIEW OP PROCEDURES The gencxal re'quirements for technical and safety reviews are contained Xn Tech'.cal Specificatioas (See Technical Specificatioas 6.5.2 and 6.8.2).

Procedure xevievs ehaL1 be conducted according to the level of importance which the proccduze may have coacerniag safety and reliability.

423. procedures shall be xeviewed by pexeoas knovledgeable in the subject of the procedure and feuds.iar with the

codes, regulatioas, ox safety standards vhich may be involved..

(See AP-3.4.3)

Ia

addition, arrangemcats shall be made for interdisciplinary review at the discretion of the pezsons authorised to approve the procedure and as required in Section 6.1 folloving.

To assist rcvievers, the author should attach a

summary and explanation of changes made to en exis ting proceduze or the justification for introduciag a aev procedure.

This should be noted in section 4.1 of Pigure 2.0.4.

6.1 The Reviewers A committee of at least two people shall be designated to review each Site administrative proceduze

'aad each procedure important to the safety or reliability of the station.

hn individual reviever mey be sufficient fox'ther procedures.

Independent x'evievers shaL1 be named by the persoa authorized to approve the procedure oz'y his designee.

They shall be selected from a

panel of authorised revievers as caU.ed for in kP-3.4.3.

a.

The individuals designated to review a procedure ehaL1 be other than the individuals vhich prepax'ed the procedure,

however, the zeviewers may be from the same organization which prepared the procedure.

b.

Each pezson designated for appzoval of procedures in accordance with Technical Specification 6.8.2 and as Meted for appzoval in AP-2.0, Section 7.1 shall also be a reviever.

Ce Requirements for interdisciplinary reviev may be satisfied by selecting persons from the disciplinee as tabulated in Section 7.1.

k Reviewer vhose signature appears as an approver on the cover page of a procedure may utilize the check sheet(e) prepared by members of the Safety Engineering Reviev Panel ae documeatation of his ox her revicv.

kP-2

-9 June 1985 (REISSUE)

6.2 Procedure for Reviewers Revieweze ehal1 complete a

check sheet containing a

summary of the items included in their review aad aay additional comments or recommendations for change from the pxocedure as originally drafted.

Changes should be discussed with the author and the results included in the xeview documentation.

If the author and original reviewers cannot agree oa xecommended

changes, additional reviewers shall be appointed.

The findings of the majority shall prevail but minority views may be included in the record.

Specialized xeview che& sheets should be provided with each series of procedure.

When

used, the specialized review chedc sheet(s) shall be attached to the form or equiva1eat provided ia Figure 2.0.4.

6.3 Use of SORC for Reviews Nothing in this procedure shell preveat the use of SORC for the review of procedures

However, should the General Superintendent desire to have a particular procedure presented to SORC for review, independent reviewers should continue to prepare review documcatation ia accozdance with Technical Specifications and this procedure AP-2 0.

The additional review by SORC sha11 be added to the other review documentation in the procedure file as provided in Figurc 2.0.4.

The reviewers of record may or may not be members of SORC snd need not be pzesent at the SQRC presentation.

When applicable the sddeada to Figure 2.0.4 may be used to document SORC review.

6.4 Review Process 6.4.1 6.4.2 Pxe&miaary to formal review signoff, the author should px'ocure a

typed draft fzom the procedures zyping group with a

copy of the

. review form Figure 2.0.4 attached.

He/she should complete and sign the review form in the same manner as aa indepeadent reviewer.

Items not applicable for initial should be marked Nh,.

ke this, time the date of tx'sasmittal oa page one of the form should be omitted but a date should follow the author's signature on section 4.6.

Thc procedure with attached review sheets should then be delivered to the independent reviewers in succession or in committee, initialed by the reviewers and signed ia section 4.7.

Acknowledgement of review by

~ty assurance should also be obtained at this time and catered on page 2 of Figure 2.0.4.

If the proceduxe is to be reviewed by SORC, copies of the fiaal draft as produced by the author should be delivered in sdvaace to members of SORC with or without the review sheet Figure 2.0.4 attached.

h.

copy with the review sheet signed and dated by the author should be delivered to the SORC chairman and secxetary at the time of the SORC meeting. It is desirable but aot necessary that the review form will include the Independent zeviewex' signatures at this time.

Zn

addition, the addenda review sheet for SORC (Section 6.3) should be included with the chairman's end secx'etazy's copies.

kt the conclusion of the SORC meeting, the SORC secretary should complete the addenda xeview sheet.

AP-2

-10 June 1985 (REIS SUE)

6.4.3 Following the completioa of revievs by the independent reviewers, Qua1ity Assurance aad/or

SORC, a copy of the review documeatatioa aad a

mazked up copy of the procedure, consoLidating all approved recommendatioas, sha11 be delivered to the author to complete a fins1 draft for production by the procedures typing group.

If this final draft differs in substance from that in the hands of thc independent reviewers at the time of their signoff, a aew form Figure 2.0.4 shall be prepared aad signed by the author snd reviewers and if requested st the previous SORC meeting, the SORC review cycle must be repeated snd documented.

7.0 APPROVE OF PROCEDURES When the final draft of a aev or revised procedure is

complete, a

coaformed copy along vith the final revicv documentatioa shaL1 be delivered to the persons designated to approve the procedure.

this time the transmittal date at the top of the fozm Figuxe 2.0.4 should be completed.

Signatures of the pcrsoas approving the procedure shall be placed in section 4.8 of the review form and on the cover sheet of the procedure.

The SORC supplemental reviev sheet which immediately pzeceded the final draft shaL1 be retsiaed with the reviev package.

Should the persons designated to approve the procedure require changes prior to approval, the review process shal1 be repeated so that all reviev

comments, and review and approval endorscments for record shaL1 be applicable to the procedure as finally to be issued The final reviev documentation snd signed approved copies shaL1 be returned to the procedures typing group for filing, publication snd distribution.

(See Section 12 for details of publication and distribution.)

7,1 Persons Desi ted to 4 rove Procedures In accordance with Technical Specificatioas in 6.8.2, the groups of Nine MS1e Point showa in the accompanying table shaLl. be approved by the persons designated.

also, to assure appropriate interdisciplinary reviev.

Members of the reviev panel should be selected from the disciplines listed, as appropriate to the technical content of the procedure.

~tional signatures of concurrence or approval shall be obtained.

foz aay site procedures from supervisors or managers in departments outside of Nucleaz Generation vhen the procedure may impact upon that department or vhca the General Superintendent, Nuclear Generation deems appropriate.

Procedures of other departments or contractors vhich come within the scope of Technical Specification 6.8 shaL1 be reviewed by the Site Superintendent or supervisor charged with the surveiL1ance of the applicable activity and presented for approval to the General Superintendent, Nuclear Generation or his designee prior to implementation.

~2 -ll June 1985 (REISSUE)

7.L (cont'd)

Disagreements or conflicts with parties outside the Nuclear Generation Department pertaining to site acceptance of their procedures or

'( their acceptance of site procedures which cannot be resolved by direct negotiation shaU.

be referred to the V5.ce President Nuclear Generation.

Standardized manufacturer's routines contained in equipment manuals and standard procedures contained in established Laboratory tezts or handbooks need not be repeated as procedures requiring signature of the Station Superintendent or General Superintendent.

Rien applicable, these may be referenced in site procedures.

AP-2

-L2 June 1985 (RZISSUZ)

Table Section 7.1 AP-2.0 Procedure Grou a. All procedures for which Technical Specification 6.8 Unit 1 or 2 requires the approval of the General Super-intendant, Nuclear Generation.

A~rova1 General Superintendent Nuclear Review Per Groups d through m

b. AllAdministrative Procedures and other procedures of Technical Specification 6.8 which pertain to the responsibilities of a Station Superintendent.

Station Superintendent, Unit 1 Per Groups d through m

and Station Superintendent, Unit 2 c. All Administrative Procedures Manager Quality Assurance,

Nuclear, Concurrence d.

Operating and Special Operating Procedurea Unit 1 or Unit 2 Supervisor Operations, Unit 1-or Unit 2 Chemistry and Radiation Management Technical Department e.

Instrument and Control Procedures Unit 1 and Unit 2 Supervisor, Instrument and Control Operations (SRO)

Chemistry and Radiation Management f.

Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Unit 1 and Unit 2 g.

Reactor and Plant Performance Procedures, Fuel flendling

. Procedures, Unit 1 and Unit 2 Superintendent Chemiatry and Radiation Management Reactor Analyst Supervisor Operations (SRO)

Maintenance Technical Department Operations (SRO)

Chemistry and Radiation Management h.

Computer and Communications Procedures Unit 1 and Unit 2

i. All Electrical, Structural and Mechanical Maintenance Procedures Unit 1 and Unit 2 Supervisor, Computer Operations and Maintenance Site Maintenance Superintendent Operations (SRO)

Technical Department including Administrative Services if involved Chealstry and Radiatdon Henadenent Operations (SRO)

Chesdstry and Radiatdon Hanadenent

)t Quality Assurance AP-2

-13 June 198S (REISSUE)

Table Section 7.1 AP-2e0(cont'd )

Bodification Installation Procedures A~revel Site Haintensnce Superintendent or Supervisor Instrument and and Control or other site department head involved'es i en Operations Chesistry and Radiation Hansaesen t quality Assurance k.

Training Procedures 1.

Inservice Inspection Procedures Superintendent Training, Nuclear Supervisor or Superintendent of Depar tment involved Superintendent, Inservice Inspection Operations (SRO)

Chemistry and Radiation Hsnagement Chesietry and Radiation klenadeaent Quality Assurance Operations (SRO)

Haintenance and/or 16C involved m.

Fire Protection Procedures Supervisor Fire Protection, Nuclear Chemistry and Radiation Hanagement Operation (SRO) n.

Preoperational Tests Technical Superintendent>

Nuclear Ceneration Nuclear Operations (SRO)

Chemistry and Radiation Hsnagement Technical Department quality Assurance o.

Start-Up Procedures Technical Superintendent>

Nuclear Generation Nuclear Operations (SRO)

Technical Department Chemistry and Radiation Hanagement quality Assurance AP-2

-I4 June 1985 (REISSQE)

8.0 TEMPORARY PROCEDURES Procedures may be generated to provide guidance in unusual situations not within the scope of the normal procedures

'and to ensure orderly and uniform operations for short periods when a plant, a system, or a component is performing in a

manner not covered by existing procedures or has been modified or extended so that portions of existing procedures do not apply.

Temporary Procedures shaM include designation of the time period during which they shall be used.

A Temporary Procedure should be generated to control the establishment of and restoration from extensive and complex equipment conditions that are either caused by or part of long-term 1aymp of safety related equipment.

The intent of this requirement is to assure that activities associated with safety related equipment are controlled by written procedures.

This also ensures that conditions that exist over a

long time period are controlled to provide assurance that equipment is returned to operable status properly.

Temporary Procedures should not be confused with Emergency Procedures or Temporary Changes to Procedures since the Temporary Procedure requires the same review and approval as any other new procedure.

If urgently needed, it may be necessary to call out key personnel for production, review, and approval.

9.0 JOINT NYPA AND NMPC PROCEDURES Joint procedures, such as Site Environmental Procedures, mutually accepted by NYPA and NMPC shall be effective when signed by both the persons authorized to approve for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station and the persons authorized to approve for the J.A.

Fitzpatrick Plant.

Review and control shall be the same as for Nine Mile Point procedures.

10.0 REVISIONS AND TEMPORART CHANGES TO PROCEDURES Revisions shall be published on revised pages or incorporated in a completely reprinted edition and shall be subject to the same rules for the production,

review, concurrence, publication, and distribution as the original procedure.

(See 10.2 for exception.)

10.1 Publication Corrections Changes to procedures such as typographical corrections which do not alter the original meaning or intent of the procedure may be by the author or one of the approvers or reviewers without recourse to the review procedd os Section 6.0.

Such changes may also include changes in

names, addresses and telephone numbers of persons occupying designated positions in the Emergency Plan or Fire Protection Plan and Procedures.

Also included are changes in the title of a position or the designation of an item of equipment where the equipment is the same as the original equipment or is an authorized replacement for the original equipment.

Not included are major changes in typography or changes in references where these may constitute significant AP-2.0

-15 March 1986

(Cont.d) alterations in the form or content of the procedure.

All changes as authorized by this paragraph shall be subject to the same distribution and document control as the last revision.

They shall include a reissue cover sheet with the revised pages marked by an (*)

and the note:

"" Changes per section 10.1 AP-2.0 Signed Date.

10.2 Tem ora Chan es to Procedure If in the preparation for or implementation of a test, operation'or maintenance function, it is found that the existing procedures wil1 not facilitate the objective of the function which may affect station safety and which requires immediate implementation, the function may be conducted with the concurrent authorization of the department supervisor concerned or his alternate and at least one other member of the site management staff one of whom holds a

Senior Reactor Operator's License on the unit affected.

The function shall be accomplished in accordance with agreed upon changes to an existing procedure or procedures which shall be produced prior to the performance of the function and approved in accordance with Technical Specification 6.8.3.

Procedure revisions so produced shall not change the intent of the original procedure or procedures.

The persons initially approving the change shall initial the first and/or second statements in the review form Figure 2.0.4 and sign the review form ~

Review check sheets and cover as provided in AP-2.0, Section 6;2 shall be attached to the documentation of the temporary change.

10.2.1 Tem ora Chan e Notice (Fi ure 2.0.5)

A, copy of the procedure change or marked copy of the procedure incorporating the change along with a copy of the review sheet shall be attached to a

Temporary Procedure Change Notice.

The original copy shall be delivered to the Station Superintendent.

(See Section 11.2. 2)

On the first business day following implementation, a

copy will be attached to the master copy of the procedure or jumper/block log.

Within fourteen days of implementation an independent review shall be completed as for new procedures and the procedure change shall be presented to the General Superintendent or designee for approval.

The supervisor approving the temporary change shass assure that the temporarily marked and approved copy and all working copies which may be used shall replace the superseded working copies.

It shall be the responsibility of the supervisor that no unmarked or superseded copies of procedures applicable to the subject work or operation shall be used.

AP-2.0

-16 March 1986

0

LOi2.2 Temblor Chan e Record Immediately fol1owing approval by the General Superintendent or

Designee, a copy with signatures shaL1 be attached to the master copy of the procedure or

)umpez/block log.

The original of the change senz to the procedures typing group.

This ensures personnel using procedures or

)umper/block 'og aze in compliance with Technical Specifications.

Office Instruction OI-7 wiLL address paper flow.

This action will provide a feedback mechanism for temporazy changes.

Upon termination of a

'one time'nly procedure, the proceduze and approved Temporary Procedure Change Notice shaLL be maintained in station historical files.

10.2.3 Noncom Liance of Tem ra Chan e If the independent reviewers and/or the General Superintendent or designee detezmines that the temporary change is not in compLiance with Technical Specifications, refer to hP-10.2.2 for reporting zeguizements e

L0.2.4 Inco ration of Tem ra Chan e into Revised rocedure.

Ifit is decided that the Temporary Change is to be incorporated into a

reguLarly revised procedure, the final production,

review, approval, filing and distribution shall proceed the same as for new or regularly revised procedures.

Dzawin Corrections 10.3.1 Change to conform with 'ai is'onfiguration.

Whenever station personnel find that a

correction is needed in a drawing to reflect the as is configuration in the station, a

change to the drawing shaLL be processed through the modification coordinator the same as for modifications in accordance with ~.0 ~

10.3.2 Marked Up Drawing If a working copy drawing or Control Room copy is marked up to reflect a change made in accordance with 10.3.1, the change shall be iniziated and dated by two station supervisors one of whom holds a

senior reactor operators license.

10.3.3 Error in Station Configuration Should it be found that the station configuration is not accordance with a valid drawing but that the drawing is the correct and desired configuration, the change shall be processed as a

modification in accord with SPW-0.

3, report if necessary shaL1 be made in accordance with AP-L0.2 kP-2

-L7 June 1985 (REISSUE)

PUBLICJLCEON AND KLQiTEKQlCE OF PROCEDURES Production Status 1.

Composition by the author, handmf.tten,'ictated or typed.

2.

Typing of draft or producing copies of handwritten draft for review and prelisdnazy acceptance.

3.

Presentation to reviewers as required.

4.

Preparation of Review Documentation.

5.

Typing of final incorporating any changes made during the review and approval process.

6.

Distribution of approval cover sheet with appropziate review check sheets and final draft to designated persons for signature.

7.

The "effective date" shown on the cover sheet of the procedure shall be the date following issue to holders unless otherwise designated by the approving authority.

(See kP-1.0 Section 5.3 and 5,4) 8.

Printing and issue of the required number of approved copies.

Publication Format Title Page Every standing procedure, instruction, or ozder shall have a title page which shall contain the foilowing information:

1.

The name of the company, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.

2 The name of the station and unit as:

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit No. 1 or )ust:

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, if generally applicable to all units on the site.

3.

The title and number of the procedure, instruction, or order.

4.

k.

tabulation listing the names and titles of aII persons approving the procedure with provision for entering signatures and dates of approval.

5.

Approval of a revision as indicated by date and initial under the revision number of a previously signed title page.

6.

The following statement should be included on each procedure cover sheet:

L 4~2

-18 June 1985 (REISSUE)

THIS PROCEDURE NOT TO BE USED kZTZR (Date)

SUBJECT TO PERIODIC REVIEW Each time a new document or revision is issued, a tabulaticm should be provided headed by the cuzrent revision number and effective date listing all the pages, figures and attachments included.

This is so that the holder wQ1 know that he has all of the correct sheets applicable to the edition approved on the cover sheet.

4 suggested model cover sheet is attached to this pzocedure.

(Pigure 2.0.2) 11.2.2 Revisions and, Changes To expedite the issuance of changes these may be issued as separate publications titled as a

Change Notice.

They shall clearly identify where the change is to be made in the procedure and contain the essential authenticating infozmation required on the procedure cover.

Colored paper should be used.

ks soon as practical all changes should be incorporated into the procedure as a

revision unless ca=lier withdrawn.

(See Section 10.2.1) 11.2.3 Page Identificaticm h page

number, procedure

number, snd date of issue shall be printed on each procedure page.

Whenever the content of a given numbered page is changed foz any reascm, such as revision or the repositioning of the text or a

~ set of pages due to retypinga new date of publication sha11 be shown.

The latest revision in the text is deiineated by a vertical line in the margin marked with the revision number or an

(~) in the case of a section 10.1 change.

When an'ntire procedure page or procedure is completely revised as noted on the title

page, a

margin line delineating the change is not required.

4 suggested model page format is'ncluded with this procedure.

(Pigure 2.0.3) 11.3 Index and Numberin of Procedures 11.3.1 Lists of aLL standing procedures, procedure change

notices, instructions, or orders called for in Administrative Procedures shaU.

be maintained under the control of the Supervisor administrative Services.

These lists shs11 contain the procedure or standing order number, title, revision number, and revision date for each document.

The office lists shaU.

be maintained

current, and when changes have been made, revised indexes shou1d be published at least quarterly.

1l.3.2 Indexes to each controlled set of procedures, instructions, or orders shall be maintained with the file of the set h,

comprehensive listing of aU. site and station procedures prepared within the scope of kchninistrative Procedures should also be inc1uded with each set of the administrative procedures.

kP-2

-19 June 1985 (REISSUE)

Proceduxe Numberiag Each procedure shall be desigaated by a

unique letter number combinatioa.

The prefix or suffix N-1 is used for Nine Mme Poiat Unit 1 and the desigaatioa N-2 fox'nit 2.

No unit code is accessary for site procedures applicable to both Unit 1 and Unit 2.

Table of Contents Whea a procedure runs to a large number of pages or is comprised of several sections which in effect constitute ma)or sub~ocedurcs a

table of contents should be included foilowiag the title page.

Procedure Files The covex sheet containiag the pen and ink signatures and one copy of each presently effective standing procedure, instruction, or order shall be maintained as the primary office fQ.e.

Copies of superseded procedures may be discarded after six years.

When superseded,,

each procedure retained in the fQ.es shall be dated and marked "supex'seded"

~

Prior to adoption of this proceduxe, the Document Review form from AN>>3 provides a record of procedure revisions 'and review.

With the approval of this procedure, kP-2, the Procedure Review check sheets and Proceduxe Change Notice forms will provide the record of revisions.

These shall be included in the proceduxc historical file.

These records should coataia the author aad reviewer names and titles and the final dates of approval for each procedure.

Currently effective operating, maiateaance, and test pxocedures should be maintained for the life of the sub5ect equipmcnt.

DISTRISUTION AND CONTROL OF PROCEDURES Authorized Holdex's It shs11 be the responsibility of the Supervisor k9ministrative Services that all procedures and revisions approved by the Station or General Superintendent are distributed to the authorized holders of controlled copies.

Each Station Superintendent shall approve the list of authorized holders for his station.

The General Superintendent shall approve lists of other authorized holders.

Each person receiving a

copy shaU.

be required to return receipt along with certification that he has destroyed any superseded copies or pages.

Lay copies of procedures not sub)ect to the controls of this section and which may be issued to individuals shall be marked "For Iafoxmatioa Only".

AP-2

-20 June 1985 (REISSUE)

4 log of aL1 procedures, revisions, and xeviews shall be maintained in administrative office files until the log is purged and forwarded to Central Piles fox'torage on microfilm.

Poxmat details shall be established by the, Supervisor Administrative Services.

Only one procedux'e should be recorded on any given page of the log.

The log foz each pzocedure shall contain the foU.owing information.

1.

Plant or plants to which the procedure is applicable.

2.

Number and title of the pzocedux'e.

3.

Date of original approval and date of eppx'oval of each revision and/or periodic zevtew, Record of issue shall contain the following infoxmation:

l.

4 serial number for each copy issued.

2.

The date of issue of each revision, 3.

The date transmittal is retuzned fox'ach issue.

h, separate record shall be maintained to key the procedure sezial

'umbers to the individual names to whom the proceduxe is issued This shall be usted whenevex' change in serial number m

'ssignment is made.

Control Room Pile Section 5.5 of ~

designates certain procedures which will be maintained in the control room and marked "Master Copy.

These Master Copies shall be maintained by the Supervisor hdndxiistrative Sezvices (Procedure Dept.).

Other procedures maxked "Master Copy" may be maintained by supervisors in the Chem Rad Management, Technical or Maintenance Departments.

Individual or De rtment Piles Maintenance of individual and department procedures files shall the xesponsibility of the individual to whom the approved copies aze issued.

He shall acknowledge receipt of 'a11 copies and be responsible for disposal of all superseded copies.

P~ODIC ~VZZW OP PROCEDURES

~~ose Each procedure authorized by these hdadaistzative Procedures shaLl be subject to periodic review at minimum intervals of two years for procedures enumerated in Regulatory Guile 1.33 and at internals of fouz years for other procedures.

This section describes the implementation of these reviews.

SP-2

-21 June 1985 (REISSUE)

13,2 Review account and Documentation 13.2.1 Documentation of Reviews Periodic reviews shall be treated the same as reviews for revision or procedure change. If no change results from the review, the review documentation shall be placed in the procedure file and the approval cover sheet sha11 be reissued noting the date of the. periodic review.

13.2.2

'chedule for Reviews The Lists of all procedures and sam~

orders maintained by the Supervisoz hdnLinistzative Services shall include the date of the most recent periodic review,. the date of the most recent revision, and the date scheduled for the next periodic reviews The scheduled date for the next review shaD be calculated from the date of the last revision or the Last peziodic review whichever is later.

Once each month the Supervisor AMaistrative Services wi11 issue lists of procedures due for periodic review.

This list shaD include all procedures due for review within 60 days of issue.

The list shaL1 also include procedures previously listed for review and which have not been recorded as reviewed.

In general, the lists wiD be subdivided into programs listed in Section 4' ~

and distributed to supervisors responsible for those programs.

13,2,3 assi ent for Review Upon the receipt of the list for periodic review the responsible supervisors shall assign the procedure to qualified persons for review.

See hP-3.4,3.

14 0 OTHER REFXZR PROCZDURZS Each supervisor responsible for implementation of one or more of the programs listed in Section 4 ~ 0 shaD be responsible for review of procedures in his category.

Whenever during his regular function as a

group supervisor procedural changes are developed or there is an occasion to audit a procedure and find that it is fuDy adequate, he shaD initiate a revision and or review as required.

hs a result new or revised procedures shall be issued according to their 22-2.0.

hP-2

-22 June 1985 (REISSUE)

Review of Standin Orders Standing orders as defined in the Nine Mile Point Administrative Procedures (AP-2.0 Section 4.15.1) issued within the past 30 days shall be presented for review to a qualified reviewer per AP-3.4.3.

The x'eview shall be reported to the Station Supexintendent or General Superintendent and the results recorded in the standing oxder master file.

At least once every six monthsp all standing orders shall be reviewed by a staff member appointed by the Station Superintendent or General Superintendent.

Recommendations shall be made at that time for

removal, updating, or incorporating in the established Administrative or Operating Procedures.

It shall be the responsibility of the Technical Superintendent or designee to maintain account that this procedure is implemented.

Review of S ecial Ozders Special Orders (AP-2.0 Section 4.14.2) shall be reviewed by the person originating the special order or by a person designated by the Station Superintendent.

Recommendations shall be made at that time for removal or incorporating in standing orders or established operating procedures, When placed in standing

orders, the oziginal date and authentication shall be preserved.

It shall be the responsibility of the Supervisor Opexations or designee to maintain account that this procedure is implemented.

Event Tzi ered Review Information on new or revised NRC Regulations, Regulatory

Guides, ANSI standards, Technical Specifications, changes to the facility and related material is regulaily distributed to station management personnel.

Each supervisor responsible for a

group of procedures shall review all affected procedures in his area and propose new procedures or amendments if required.

The results of this action will become a

procedure review.

It shall be the responsibility of the Technical Superintendent or designee to maintain account that this procedure is implemented.

Scheduled C cle Review The Procedure Review system list outlined in Section 13.2.2 will reflect the results of special reviews and event-triggex'ed reviews such that only procedures not covered by one of these reviews within the designated interval for scheduled cycle review will appear on the monthly lists distributed to supervisors.

Procedures on the monthly 3

review list may be assigned for review at the next occasion for use.

Otherwise a

review or change in accordance with AP-2.0 shall be completed by the end of the month listed.

AP-2.0

-23 January 19S6

pkocEDLNK At'unvAL tULTRIx FICURK 2.0. l STATION DEthklNKNT CARH 5

5 5

5 CARN 5

0 14C N

0 0

H hl.L ChkN H 14C C4kN Rh H

0 Rh ALL Al.l ALL 0 CAEN 0

5 5

0 PROCEDURE CROUt NT 5

CAEN 14C N

Rh 0

T 3 Ii etc0 Nuclear Tralnlnh Site Rsdlocheu 4 lad ~

Hansheaeat Instruucnt 4 Coatro1 Hcchsnlcaf aod Elect

Helot, kesctor hnalrst Operat ink Tccha I ca I Sect!os lo AP-2.0 tkOCEDURK LKITBL CODKSe At SKK NASTKR INDEX~

ADD N I FOR UNIT I N 2 FOR UNIT 2 ~

NAT ADD 5 FOl SITE<<

io O

OI DCI Ett SFP EAt KtNF oM v

8 H

4 O

Ot DIP H

p ol f fi

~o SOF NST ICF ISF ST FSF FFll EST OSF NSF ESP ISI CSP kSt tN IH TKN IHP EtN NtN CFN KHF lit NHF Ckt Ht kSF NOD OM t

Rs cl 4

i-s

)c CSP CkI CAt Ckt tSF SF LIP CCt RCt FHF RFSF RAt RPST RCPC M

POT TDF It RFI CI RRI Ak1 Nl NTI 50 NNF cc

<<i

~0

~

u'Dt Ft St ULLP clci ISI NT AFtROVALS

%y i 'Ia~

X)sfIoa 'Super fnlcaIceQ lfpePK Skpdtrl ddt 1(efnti Super a co eo IkffX CIXP SupcFilso upri Riil Supporf XfiifRPGi~kc W).$~PSPc..

Hcnsher QA (Coneurrenee) d<<1a'~crr ces Supedilior

~iyerrfior Fire Frotectfon Tecli2 SerrICei Supt, Meth Sh~p

~

upfI Ttifa~at u

csr upf lnsefilce Taspe oa Supt, RecoiiTi Nsnsheuent

<<parr~oaf Hkdlr~tturIIX.

Jail LfssWe. Sppt, X

I 1

3 X

(3)

II (3)

(5)

'(5)

(3)

X X

5)'3

5) 0 I

I R

X I

'75 5

'(3 I

.I Q

X~)

Q Bl (3)

@AC

( )

(3

)

I (3)

~ FDI"a Oolr AP-2.0

-24 Jsnuarr luh4

FICURF. 2.0.1 (Conti sued)

PROCEDURE IETTIR CODES ~

At OI DCI Ktt Stt RP SEE HASTER INDEI~

ADD Flt N-I FOR UNIT lo N-2 FOR FlHC UNIT 2s HAZ ADD 8 CORSITKA't SOF MtS leZ ICF ISF ST FST FtH ESZ OSC HIP 1St IS!

CSt tN FHt kTF RCt FNt CRlt IH ft4t CRt RtSF CAt TEH RSt Rht CkP IHP RFSZt FSF FPH SF HFH COT TDP SO Ft NHt Rtl CI RRI ARI NII UI ENVSp MNP HOD IS(

NZ FDF ANS/ANSI 3 2 tkOCEDURE ELEMENTS 5+3.2(I) ~ 5.3.9+i(1)

$.3.2(2) 5.3.9.1(2) ~ 5.3+9+3(F) 5.3.2(3)

$.3.2($ ), fe3.4.1(I) 5.3.4.5(1)

$ 3 5(1) ~ 5 3 9e3($ )

5.3.2(5),

$.3.9.3(6) 5,3.2(6) 5.3.9.1(3), 5.3+9.3(y) 5.3.9.1(4) 5.3.9.3(I).(2),(3),(4)

$.3.2(F), 5.3.4.1(2)

$.3.4.$ (2), 5.3.5(2) 5.3.2(9)

$.3.2(8) 5.3.9.3(8) 5.3.5(4)

TITLE tURtOSK SZHPTOHS RKFERINCES FRIREOUISITES AND/OR FREFARA'ZION PRECAUTIONS LIHITATI0 MS AND ACTIONS AIIIONATICACTIONS INDIVIDUALACTIONS AMD ASSICNHIÃZS STEt RZ STEP HAIN RODT CNECÃ OFF LISTS FINAL CUECX OUT OR ACCEPTANCE SUFFORTINC HAIMTo OOCUNINTS ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS I

I I

I I

0 0

II I

0 0

I 0

0 I

I I

I 0

0 I

I 0

0 I

I 0

I I

I XI I

I I

I I

I I

0 I

I I

I I

I I

0 0

0 D

0 0

0 0

I I

I I

I I

I 0

0 I

I I

I I

II 0II I I I

X I I

0 0

0 I

X 0

I I I

0 I

I 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 I I I

I I 0

I I 0

I I I I I

I I I

I I

I I

0 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

X 0

0 0

0 X

I X

X 0I 0

I 0

I I

0 I

0 I

I 0

I I

I 0

I I

X I

I I

I 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 I

0 I

0 0

0 0

I I I 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

D 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

D 0

0 X

I I I

0 I

X 0

I I I 0

0 II I

I I

0 0

X I

I I

X I

I I

I I

I I

I 0

I I

0 I

X I

I I I 0

I I I 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 I

I I I

I I I I

0 I

X I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I I

I I

I X

I I X

$.2.9 5.2 IO

$.2 12

$.2*13 5.2 14 5 2ol6

$.2.17 5.2.18 5 2 19 5.3.6

$.3.1 5.3.8 5.3.9+2 SECURITZ AND VISITOR CONTROL INUSEREEPINC AND CLEANLINESS CONTROL RECORDS MANAGEMENT FROCUREHFHZ AND MATERIALCONTROL NOH CONFORHINO ITEMS HEASURINC AND TEST EQUIPNINZ INSFECZIONS CONTROL OF SFECIAL PROCESSES TEST CONTROL RADIATION CONTROL PROCEDURES CALIRRATION AMD TEST tkOCKOURES CREHICAL kADIOQIKHICALCONTROL tkOCKDURES EVENTS OF POTENTIAL BQRCENCZ (I)

(2)

(3)

Rerlcu cndlor approval ~ required troccdure Elencot should alusys be cess ldcrcd ll eppl (cable trocedure eleucot nay ba uaelul IZ

~FPIIcablc~

Ss(cry related proceduree only'aried on procedure tlt(c pskc, At seat tehulat oonthly SORC occrloSi Ney be Issued by clrbct Supcrlorcadcnt or Operations Supertlsot Approrsl rcqulrcd lf procedure ls In

~upcrulsors ot aupcrlnreodcnto dcpsrtncnt area Unit 1 ssd Uslt 2 Cot alta procedures othcrulse applicable Ualt only'F-T.O 2$

January ls86

NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION ADMINISTRATIVEPROCEDURES PROCEDURE NO ~ AP-APPROVALS SIGNATURES DATE AND INITIALS REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2 S tation Superintendent NHPNS Unit 1 (Name)

Station Superintendent NMPNS Unit 2 (Name)

General Superintendent Nuclear Generation (Name)

Quality Assurance Concurrence Manager Quality Assurance-Nuclear (Name)

Summa of Pa es Revision 0

(Effective NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION THIS PROCEDURE NOT TO BE USED APTER SUBJECT TO PERIODIC REVIEW ~

• Changes made per section 10.1 AP-2.0 S gnature FIGURE 2.0.2 AP-2

-26 June 1985 (REISSUE)

Date

0

e f.

~sc

~ l 0

00180th

~

o a

om~u m a+

~IL aelbl ~

~

~ I i ~ ai 1i ~

V 3.0 3.F 2 FRO -5~(.

FOR !V~ir.)A C..'.;

01

'tc Ho)C tags shal) bc issued vIth a='nsm))CC cn all nancanfa.&

g Stra anC on the svst~

LhS~L ~v '~ -la ed ir. service~

cause he nonconfomng it's te be pu to use.

a)

'These tags s)all only be p)aced and t~ved "

Citcttion of a a-

.S=e p~ity go=to) Supe.:isor

~

b)

Ho)C gags place o

Wcc c

~1 i e& ins al)ed in <<

plant shall be caoveC after all req"'.eC tests anC Snspectians a-. e ca~)e CC anC all rec"iteC ce. Sfications and docuacnts are an hand~

Si6i3 3.6.4 Should it be Snpossib)e or ~.attica) ta bring -H nance=~a.'ng S'tens Snsa confazwnce p Scr 'to a recj~r~wt ar usc ~ 'the non~

con otning Stm shall be tenored anC re-laceC L"th a ec=

Umg Sac= prior to placing any syste=

Sn service o: cmment in ewe.

The disposition of vaiver or noncanfc=Sag stores Steas (re-fcrcnce paragraph 3.2.2.b this prated.=e) anC the fudge=en to usc a noncanfaruing iten Ce~<ag fm Cesig spe if)actions nay be recoreeended by S,O.R.C.

on)y IIhenl a)

There is no unrevieLvd safety ques icn maw)ved.

b)

The ccrponent and syste" vill neet a)) ergircering functions) require-eats as given in thc FSAR.

c)

This deviation has no advc-.se effect on the safety or process function of the c~~ne-t acd s)wte-.

~

o o

e ooo o

os o roe o

o ooooo

~ ++++ oooae ceo oo I

II I,

III I

I

) 'a I

I

~ ~

I II I

~ ~I

\\ ~III 3,6.5

~ 3.6.6 4 ~)

c ~).I Canpanents hand)ed according to paragraph 3.6.4 and paragraph 3.2.2 of this procedure in effect shall no longe-.

be nan confornin'g SteeLs" but shall, before hey are required to function Sn a safety-re)atcd

systcn, neet all the qua)ity requirenents sct forth Sn Append)a B )0 ~r 50 and the Final Safety Ana)ysis Rcport for the facility.

See {gal-)3.0.

lf the naterial final)y accepted as corfcrUng to the iequirenents of 10 CFJt 50 Appendix B is nac asset)>

as described in the original requisition and purchase

order, a requisition and purchase order change shall be issued to document agree-<<cnt, FnocKOUccg Fog coÃncoL OF sgc'v)tES V~intenance and lnspcc Son Se lect lan hhenevcr it is Sapractica) for qualified s ation personnel to pcrforn na)ntcnance or inspect)on.

ocher q a)if)ed::)agora Nohsvk paver Corporation c=ployees or a succab)c qm)Sf)ed contractor shall be brought in.

AF)i )4

)S August )0.2

~ ~

I I

II III

~ ~

o ~I

~ ~

I

~ ~

'I I

~ (

~ I Fl gQTe 2 ~

one-half'nch

)naTt;in at bottoa Su ested Node l Pape Forgat 2 - g7I 3'one 1985 (RE~SU

PROM:

SdZEZT END TECHNICS, REVIEW OF PROCEDURE Page 1 of 3 Figure 2.0e4 kuthorp Editor D~

TO s The attached procedure No.

(Bevision No.

) Tit1e is presented for yonr approvai or concnrrence.

The undersigned, Page 3, has (have) completed an independent review of the subject procedure as revised 1.0 No Safety Aaa1ysis Required 1.1 The proceduze is not safety related. It is not concerned with the operation, maintenance, oz testing of any systems or equipment important to safety or of any equipment related to the safeguarding of safety related equipment or which might affect the integrity of safety equipment.

initial pate 1.2 The procedure does not make or authorize changes in the station or station procedures as described in the safety analysis zeport (SAR) and a safety analysis is not required in accordance with 10 CPR 50.59. It is in conformance with Technical Specifications and wiLl not change any safety analysis contained in the safety analysis report.

2.0 Safety Analysis Required 2.1 The'procedure may require changes in the station as described in the safety analysis report or in procedures as described in the safety analysis repozt but may be implemented in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 (a)(2) provided an analysis shows that it does not involve an unreviewed safety question oz a change in Techzdcal Specifications.

It should be referred to the Nuclear Enginee ing and Licensing Department for analysis prior to implementation.

2.2 The procedure may involve an unreviewed safety question or a change in Technical Specifications and in the judgment of the reviewers must be referred to the Nuclear Engineering and Licensing Department for analysis and disposition. It should not be implemented until it is determined that it does not iavolve an cnteviese6 safety tnestion or s change in 1echnical Specifications or un', an appropriate license change is obtained.

2 28 June

] 98$

(REISSUE)

SEZETY AND TECHNICAL REVZEW OF PROCEDURE (CONT.)

Page 2 of 3 Pigure 2.0e4 3.'1 The items checked below have been included in the review of the reference procedure and are presented in the place of a specific check sheet for the /

/

procedure.

3.2 4 special check sheet is attached for the reference procedure and is to ba considered supplemental to the items checked below.

/ /

/

/ Compliance with CHU'USNRC ~ Consulted with the following person(s)

Regulatory Guide(s) about this procedure.

Dated Naca Tit1e Dated Nmte Title Dated Name Title Dated Name Title

~ Compliance with ANSI Standard(s)

Dated Dated Dated Number Revision

~ Consistency with the following Station/Site Procedure(s)

~

~ Compliance with ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code(s)

Number Number Revision Revision Section Date Addendum Number Revision S ection Date Addendum Section Date Addendum ~ Procedure(s) contains adequate equipment lists, precautions and limitations, prerequisites,

graphs, diagrams or data sheets as required.

Section Date Addendum

~ Compli,ance with Technical Specifications

/ Procedure references to Valve Numbers,"

Motor Control Center Numbers, Power Supplies Znstrumentation are clear and correct.

Chapter Section Chapter Section Revision ~ The steps in the Procedure are clear and accurate.

They are not unnecessarily Revision difficult to implement.

Chapter Section Revision

~ All references needed to implement the procedures are c1early stated and avaLLable

~

/

7 Procedure reflects latest system oz component configuration.

~ Procedure reflects work as it is actuaLly being done at the station.

Quality assurance has <

has not 0 reviewed this procedure and have made the foilowing remarks:

Signature Qh. Staf Date

>P-2

-29 June 1985 (REZSSUE}

SAFETY AND TECHNICAL REVIEW OF PROCEDURE (CONT.)

Page 3 of 3 Figure 2e0.4 The attached procedure No.

Rev. No.

dated 4.l An ezplanation and summary of changes is attached. ~

4e2 Is recommended for approval as presented. ~

4.3 Recommended changes are marked on the procedure or attached. ~

4.4 The procedure is not recommended for approval for reasons given on the attached report. ~

4 e5 The procedure should be referred to the Nuclear Engineering and licensing Department for further analysis and recommendation. I~

~Si ature 4e6 Author(s) 4.? Revdevets This procedure reviev has been received and accepted by those approving oz concurring within the procedure.

4.8 ~atovets June 1985 (REISSUE)

PROCURE QfAHCK NOTICE A.

TO:

S ATION SUPM~INic'ADBPi'tan.oa or Uat.c 1.

Proposed revision auaber auabcr Tickle to procedure h tenpomry chango Mes asdc to pcoccdure nuabc" g

zs ind'cared oa che at~had rcport a.

TOa CENmaI SUPZZZrrmmENT The tcnporary procedure revision vas approved by cad m bciag i~lencntcd pe AP-2.0 sectioa 10.2. This rev~on

@as rcvicved by thc uade igaed independent avinrers sad aaust bc approved v'thin 14 days of issue acco~4g co Tedanicsl Spe~cat'-oa 6-8.3o C>>

ZNDEDRfT PMVZRf The

'tcaa porn~

change vas revinred by the unde=signed revtcMers Mho vena not involved in che drsf~ or aprovaL o"

thc change.

It is receancadcd that this change bc K.corporated ss 4

permsaeat revision to an ~ting procedure

~

2.

The tcnporary change was cevicveC by thc uadcmigacd reviarcm uho Mc c not involved in the drsf~- or approval of the change Zt is reconncaded that it shouLd be for "one

" use only and should aot become a pc~eat rcv'on to sn arising procedurao CENE'. SU~~~BfT (or desieaee)

APPROVhL Thc tcnpora~

change is approved in accordance Mi h Tcchnical Specificstioa 6.8 3 Dlca Cene"sl Supe= ntcaceat Nuc'car Ccac"scion Figure 2+0+5 June 1985 (REISSUE)

~ ~

SUETY AND TECHNICAL REVIEW OF PROCEDURE (SORC MDENDA)

Figure 2.0.4 The attached procedure Date has been reviewed by the Site Operations Review Committee at a meeting held on Date.

The following vere present at the meeting:

Name Title Review presentations vere made by the following:

The procedure vas recommended for approval as presented.

0 The procedure vas recommended for approval vith changes as noted in the meeting.

0 The procedure vas returned to the author for redraft and resubmittal.

0 The committee voted that a safety analysis should be made.

0 The committee acknowledged statement 1.1 of Figure 2.G.4.

D The committee acknowledged statement 1.2 of Figure 2.0.4.

0 The following remarks vere recorded in SORC minutes concerning the procedure:

Signed Secretary Date AP-2 -31'une 1985 (REISSUE)

lNTERNAI.CORRESPONDENCF.

'ORM 1424 h~

~1MS PROV, T.

E.

Lempg

~

~

~

~

l Ke&ib~n:

AQ, non-eel.ahen ed eke peuonnaL DlsTRlcT Mine %La Point MucLam Stcc~n DATE June 2~>

1985 FILE coDE MMP-10932 SUBJECT Ted~~

Revieso and Co~4 The baLou Tedu~L Spacigcationh

)mqLilcee the GenetaL Supem<endent-MucLecut W donate memb~

o$ ~ e~n supmvLho~ san(]

ah Rue,+ed eau~eh.

This ~t I'LL ba pgruudicaLLy mvLeued by Tec.~'. SuppoM and changes oa daLatione shouLd be, bIcougkt W tLis attention.

PerceonneL ~nad A speci gc unit shouLd pec(own rmv~ onLy on~ per~ining W~

PmbonnaL m ~a po~nh ehaLL )uLLy meat~ job dahcnLptcunh o~ ~ be quaLi +ed W per$ oen mvLeue.

6.5.2.1 Each cecum and Icom ~unread b

Speci. '

6. 8 o

c a

act cd4 ea ah e

e, pcs yap vchaL/ogan-

~n.

Each such pnncedhvce, and ah 4~,

ehaLL be.

mvi.cued by an indi,v~/glcoup o~

~ ~vkhnL/

gmup Io '~vmd Ae pnaced~,

oc changes 4~,

bat ufo may ba ~m &a sama organization as ~kuKvktuaL/

gmup IoLLch ~epaezd Che pnncectc~,

oz changes erato.

AppnovaL o$ pnoc~ee and pnogncune and chancIah 8~ and safety auaQu~nh, shaLL be co~ZLed by ahhince~va pjcocedu~.

6.5.2.2 6.5.2.9 Proposed chccn ah W ~ Ta~~~

Spaciguctconh shan be v

ongamz n.

Tha pnapcna~n o$ each pnapoead Tacit,uaL Speci.+~n'e change shaLL be ru.ui.eu3ed by an mdiuictcucL/gmup o~~ ~

/gmup uhi.ch pmpemf Wa pe@posed

change, but ufo may be

$mm We sama o~couzatcon ah ~ ~v~/go@up which picapmed ~ proposed

change, Proposed changah W Na Teduuzat Speci.gca~ne ehaLL ba appurued by Na Genome Sup~endent

- MucLeuc Generation.

Pn ead mocLi

'h N unit hOcuct~,

eyeCemh and com-pon a

ecz ean. sa s

e designed by a Juan.+Ed ~v~/ohgmuzatcon.

Each such mocKgu~~n shaLL be )mud.efoed by an ~v~/getup o~~ ~

'v~/grroup uthuh dined We mode gccction, but echo may ba ~m Wa sama o~anczation ah ~LeKv~/go@up utch deepened Wa modigu~n.

Pnoposad mocK@cc~nh W eCucctuaah, systems and components and We safety evaLucctionh shaLL ba approved pIuoe W knpLemantc~n by ~ General Sup~endent

- MucZecur Gener~n; oa Wa Sta~n Supe@;

end+< - NucL~ Genatcation; oa Na TachnicaL Supecietznden MucLevt Geneu~n ah pmvioueLy dah~

y

~-2.0 - 33 June 1985 JUN 2 5 t995 N,M.P.C.

OPERATIONS RECofQS MANAGEQENJ lAKiNQ AmP I@8~

Page 2

'.3.2.4 Individu~ )mdponbiMa Joe rmvkeus pm]owned in accordance taMt Specigaa~nh 6.5.2.1, 6,5.2.2 and 6.5.2.9 hhaLL be members o( ~ h~n hupercvihocy b4x$ $, pmvmcc6Ly d bu ~ GeneJraJ'.

S

'nt '- 'bluet'.au> Genena~n N pm own h

4ev4cQ$

~

b CC.v4$4 h 4

a of NtL65c4 04 not adLKiA4lttLL, cJLDbb-cA.

4C.vow 4h necehb~.

T J deemed necehbang h

rmv~ h be pu.$ oenad bp ~ appeopuate dehignated ~ion mv~ penbonnef'.

Qual',

Reviegacs LAC - AP 1.1 [Figure 1.1.1),

AP 1.2 tF~uea 1.2.1)

Sta~n and Site. Sup~enden45 Supen,vihom Genena~n Engutee4 Setied tAhbociate., Genetn~n, Ahbo~ Senior, and Senior LeveQ)

Geneta~n Spe~LQC Sense tAhhoaiata, Geneu~n, Ahbociata Senior,,

and Senior LeveQ)

NOTE t The onigumtoc tau6rue) o$ ~ Mem Joe mviev bhcQ. be mponh~

$oa cnnbh-IQcipUnany evi.ev and i( aebb-dibcig~xcy ere noC necehbcey, document ugly on rmvieto

$onm.

AP-2.0 - 34 June 1985