ML17055B530

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to Site Administrative Procedure AP-6.1, Procedure for Mod & Addition.
ML17055B530
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/20/1986
From:
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML17055B512 List:
References
AP-6.1, NUDOCS 8604280278
Download: ML17055B530 (88)


Text

Enclosure 89 1 %1m ~

,I NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES PROCEDURE NO. AP-6.1 PROCEDURE FOR MODIFICATION AND ADDITION - UNIT 2 DATE AND INITIALS APPROVALS S IGNATURES REVISION.O REVISION 1 REVISION 2 Station Superintendent NMPNS Unit 2 R. B. Abbott General Superintendent Nuclear Generation QQ V T. J. Perkins Manager, Pg'feaO Ehj~neering C.

Co( i ce Manager Materials Management R.~ T. Kotcamp Concurrence guality Assurance Concurrence Manager, ~

Nuclear gA Operations

~ W. A. Hansen Summary of Pa es Revision 0 (Effective

~Pa es Date i-ii, 1-42 March, 19B6 NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION THIS PROCEDURE NOT TO BE USED AFTER SUBJECT TO PERIODIC REVIEW.

8604280278 860415 Q s PDR ADOCK 050004iO):

P 'DR+

AP-6.1 TABLE lFZUATENTS SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE

).o PURPOSE

2.0 REFERENCES

3.0 SCOPE 4.0 GENERAL PROCEDURE 4.1 Excepti on s 4.2 Modifications (Temporary Or Permanent) 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Request For Modi fication Or Addition 5.2 Functi onal Speci ficati on And Conceptual Engineering 5.3 Desi@ Phase 5.4 Installati on Plan And Scheduling

. 10 5.5 Installation Of Modification 14 5.6 Acceptance For Operati on 16 s~ Coordinated Project Management 16 6.0 CLOSEOUT PHASE 17 7.0 RESPONSI B ILITIES 17 7.1 SITE ORGANIZATION 17 7.2 Engineering Organi zati on 19 7.3 guali ty Assurance Organi zati on 21 8.0 PROJECT RECORDS AND CONTROLS 21 8.1 Modi fication Engineer 22 8.2 Fi les 22 8.3 Design Document Revisions 22 8.4 Machine Records Log 22 8.5 Forms In Appendix 22 9.0 APPENDIX

SUMMARY

23 AP-6.1 -i - March, 1986

INTRODUCTION to AP-6.1, PROCEDURE FOR MODIFICATION h ADDITION - UNIT 2 The following Policy Statement from the Engineering Transition Plan i s not part of this procedure. It is provided as background information, and e stabli she s organi zati ona1 and functi onal re spon sibi li ties during the transition period.

"This policy statement is to describe the transition plan for the NMP2 Engineering Organi zati on and i denti fy responsibili ties during the peri od from fuel 1 oad through co+re rci al ope ra ti on. At fuel 1 oa 4, plant ope ra ti on and admini strati on i s governed by NMPC '

Admini strative Procedures. Modi ficati ons to plant systems, structure s, and components am under the control of NMPC Admini strative Procedures and changes are processed in accordance with the requiremnts contained therein, as modified for NMP2 during the tran si ti on pe ri od. At fuel 1 oa d, the ove ra 1 1 techni ca 1 msponsibility relating to the engineering and design of Unit 2 rests with NMPC's Manager of Nuclear Engineering.

Duri n g the pe ri od of power a scen si on (fuel 1 oad to cooee rci al oper ati on), Project Engineering will be ali gned along the organizational structure of the future Unit f2 Design Organization.

Personnel desi gnated for the NMP2 Desi gn Organi zati on will be matri xed into the Project Engineering Organi zati on and assume wsponsibilities associated with both groups during the transition period. This includes three discipline leads (mechanical, electrical and structural) and a Lead Modification Engineer. this organization +

will provide the direct interface for NMPC Operations for Engineering Servi ces (provi ded by SWEC or others) <equi md during the power ascensi on phase.

Functions and msponsibilities presently delegated to the Project Engineering Organization will be retained during this period. 'the technical responsibilities and authority for Engineering and Design wi11 rest with te NMPC Manager of Nuclear Engineering, and may be dele gated to the Manage r of Engineering - NMP2 Project. Desi gn Services, technical support of power a scen si on and assi gned modifications can be provided by SWEC and conducted in accordance wi th their Corporate procedures and the Project bhnual. Interface procedure s aequi md to integrate NMPC Ope rati on s, NMPC Licensing, Project Engineering and SWEC Engineering and Design will be developed such that the applicable admini strative procedural requi r ments are impl emen te d.

Modifications identified as .being post-fuel load will be under the review and approval control of the NMP2 Change Review Commi ttee.

Design of modifications may be assigned to NMPC during the transition period in accordance with NMPC's Corporate Engineering Procedures or to the Project Engineering organi zati on for Uni t 2. Where the tran smi ttal of desi gn informati on to SWEC i s mquired during the transition period, speci fic interface procedures will be developed."

AP-6.1 -ii- March, 1986

PROCEDURE FOR MODIFICATIOH AND ADDITION - UNIT 2 PURPOSE Thi s procedure de seri be s the mechani sms for the ini ti a ti on and control of, replacements, additions, or modi fications (temporary or permanent) of plant systems or equipment. It delineates the persons and groups and their responsibilities and pmscribes the methods to be employed for documenting these changes.

lhis procedure shall become effective for modifications to systems that have been accepted for Operations and will n.main in effect for modi ficati ons assi gned to the HMP2 Project organi zati on for impleoentation in accordance with the NMP2 Project Procedures Program.

2.0 REFERENCES

NOTE'hi s list of re fe mnces does not of i tsel f consti tute incorporati on into thi s procedure of all or part of any reference. Regulations, guides and other procedures which are a part of this procedure am noted in the text where applicable.

2.1 NMPC-QATR-1, Quality Assurance Program, Topical Report For Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Operations, December 1985.

2.2 Administrative Procedure AP-5.0, Procedure For Repair.

2.3 Administrative Procedure AP-7.0, Control of Material and Services.

Administrative Procedure AP-10.1, Management of Station Records.

'.5 Admi ni strati ve Procedure AP-3.3. 2, Placement of Jumpers/Bl ocks or Lifted Leads.

2.6 Appendix 8 of 10CFR50.

2.7 Quality Assurance Procedures - Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.

2.8 ANSI/ASME NQA-1 -1 983, Qua 1 i ty Assurance Program Requi remen ts for Nuclear Faci1i ties.

2.9 NMPC Nuclear Engineering & Licensing Procedures (HEL's, ND's, NT's) 2.10 U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.26, Duality Group Classification and Standards for Water, Steam, and Radi oactive Waste Containing Components of Nuclear Power Plants.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

ANSI/ASME BSPV Secti on XI, Article IWA 7200-through winter 1983 Addenda 2.12 10CFR50 Appendix R, 10CFR50.49

.E.> S 10CFR21 2.14 ANSI/ASME NgA-2-1 983, t)uali ty Assurance Requi mments for Nuclea r Pomr Plants.

2.15 ANSI N45.2.4 - 1972 (Unit 2) 2.1.6 ANSI/ANS 3.2 - 1982 Administrative Controls and guality Assurance for Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants.

2.17 Project Manual for Nine Mile Point Unit 82 which defines and controls the NMP2 Project Procedures Program.

2.18 Administrative Procedure AP 6.0, Rev. 1, October 1985, Procedure for Modification and Addition.

2.19 NMPC (}-List, Unit 2 3.0 SCOPE 3.1 This procedure covers all modi fications (temporary or permanent) and additions to the station process systems, structures, or components.

Changes as defined in 10CFR50.59 require a safety evaluation and are sub ject to the gual i ty Assurance requi remen ts of Appen di x 8, 10CFR50. Procedures for all design activities involving safety related systems shall be in accordance with gATR-l, Section 5.0. The Niagara Mohawk Policy for changes to station design is contained in the gATR-1, Section 3.0.

4.0 GENERAL PROCEDURE 4.1.1 Re 1 acements 1 Exact replacements procured in accordance with t. e NMP2 l}ATR-1, Sect. 7.2.5 and/or ASME,Section XI, IWA-7210 (a or (b) may be installed without recourse to a new design safet analysi s. Applicable procurement and guali ty Assuranc requi remnts shall be oat and station documentati on of these d t ovid station components an con

2. Replacements of quality listed components or systems which are procured in accord with ASME, Section XI, IWA7210(c) shall be subject to an analysis as noted in IWA7210(c) and in IWA-7220.

Applicable procurement and quality assurance requi reagents shall be met for these replacements and station documentation shall be updated to reflect any changes.

AP-6.1 Ma rch, 1986

When noti fied by a vendor that replacements for quality listed components or subcomponents -are not considered t

safety m1 a ted, i shall be the m sponsibi ty of the li department which requested the components to request that the responsible desi gn organi zati on perform or obtain an independent determination or safety evaluation to classify these components, unless this evaluation has already been performed as indicated by classi fication in the Unit 2 Q-Li st.

3. Replacements which involve a change in design as described in 10CFR50.59 and hence requi re a 'sa fety evaluati on shall be considered modifications and will be handled in accordance with paragraph 4.2 below.
4. All replacements which are not subject to the Quality Assurance Program and do not involve a design change as described in 10CFR 50.59 shall be made in accordance with established Project and Nuclear Generation Department procedures. Purchase requi sitions originating on site shall be handled as required in accordance with the NMP2 Project Procedures Program. Station docuaentation shall be updated to reflect any changes.

4.1. 2 Punchl i st Work i tems that are documented against equi plant/systems on the Ma ste r Track) ng System (MTS) or tran s ferred to the Work Tracking System (WTS) at system acceptance, may be installed without recourse to a new desi @ sa fety analysi s. Any changes to the desi gn installation must be evaluated as required by Section 5.5.7 of this procedure. Applicable Project/NMPC Corporate procurement and Quali ty Assurance requimaants shall be m t and station documentation shall be updated in accordance with the NMP2 Project Procedures Program to provide a current record of station components and configuration.

4.1. 3 Non-Im act Documentati on Changes to desi gn documents may be i ssued for correcti ons, clarifications or procedural reasons as long as those changes do not impact the basi s on whi ch the plant was accepted (i .e., sa fety analysi s).

4.2 Modifications (Tem orary or Permanent) 4.2.1 Site Modi fication Concept:

lee concept for a change may originate with anyone. Ibis may be the result of observed station performance, surveillance test experience or equipment failure frequency. Other sources of equipment or system change concepts may be one of the following sports (not necessarily all inclusive):

AP-6.1 March, 1986

NMPC Problem Reports (NMPR) as de fined in the Startup Admini strative Procedures (SAP's).

NRC LER's, 8ulletins, Circulars, Notices NRC Reactor Operating Experience Reports (ROE's)

NRC Reactor Construction Experience Reports (RCE's)

General Electric Operating Experience Reports (OR's)

General Electric Technical Information Letter (TIL's)

General Electric Service Infomation Letter (SIL's)

General Electric Field Disposition Instruction (FDI's)

General Electric Field Deviation Disposition Request (FDDR's)

General Electric Product Service Information Letter (PSIL's)

General Electric Operating 8ulletins INPO (SERS 4 SOER)

General Electric Product Experience Report manufacturers or vendor bulletins or advi sories i ssued in compliance with 10CFR21 or as the result of inservice inspection.

As a result of any of the above conditions or change concepts, a modification may be required. A Modification Request Form shall be prepared as delineated in Appendix 1 of this procedure:

~ Mhen required by the NMP2 Project Procedures Program, OR

~, Mhen condi a change ti ons/change i s indi cated concepts noted.

based on review of the The reason for the change shall be inserted on the Modification Request by the originator.

Sa fety Evaluati ons A safety evaluation is aequi red for all modifications performed in accordance wi th thi s procedure. Mhen the conceptual desi gn of a modi ficati on has been sufficiently developed, a safety evaluati on shoul d be p rformed and included in the conceptual engineering package. The safety evaluati on shall be in accordance wi th 10CFR 50.59. Sa fety evaluati ons completed by the responsible desi gn organi zati on shall be per the NMP2 Project Procedures Program.

Safety evaluations are submitted to SORC for review at the option of the General Superintendent t in accordance wi th Uni 2 Technical Specification and the guality Assurance Programs. Safety evaluations a re review d by SORC pe r AP-3.4.1. Sa fe ty eva 1 ua ti on s sha 1 1 be reviewed and revised, if mquired, after the design is finalized and after the modi ficati on i s accepted for service. Final safety evaluations shall .be reviewed by SORC.

Non Safety Related Changes:

Non safety related modifications shall be presented to the Station Superintendent or Gene ra 1 Supe ri nten dent for approval .

Implenentati on and documentati on shoul d be in accordance wi th thi s Procedure and the NMP2 Project Procedures Program and Nuclear Generation Procedures.

Safety and guality Related Changes:

Sa fety rel ated modi fi cati ons and modi ficati ons which pertain to quali ty related systems (as desi gnated in Note 34 of FSAR Table 3.2-1) shall be subject to all the controls of this procedure.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

15O PROCEDURE 5.1.0 Re uest for Modification or Addition All requests for modi ficati ons or addi ti ons shall be mceived, mviewd and processed by tHe NHPC Modification Engineer using the instructi on and standardi zed format as provi ded in Appendi x 1 Modi fication Request fons. Requests originating from sources other than those described in Section 4.2.1 should be reformatted by the Modification Engineer on the standard form. Inputs for these forms should be taken from appropriate initiating documents.

The Modi fication Engineer assigns a serial number and enters the proposed modification in the computerized Modification Log (Appendix

2) (See 5.1.3 and 5.7.1). He also records this information on the Modification Request Form.

5.1.1 Review of Re uest (See Appendix 1) 5.1. 2 Tran smi tta1 (See Appendix 1) 5.i.3 ~fhdlfl The Modification Log shall be a machine record of the schedule and status of all modifications or additions which have been proposed, are in progress, or have been completed. Each modification should be represented by a report line or set of contiguous lines and each major project event should be represented by a column . Appendix 2 lists the proposed data columns.

The NMPC Modification Engineering Group shall be responsible for maintaining thi s log.

5.1. 4 Hodi ficati on Request Di sapproval The ori ginator and the m sponsible desi gn organi zati on shall be iamediately noti fied of any modi fication request which has been disapproved in order to stop and cancel any engineering activities and documents.

5.2 Functional S cification and Conce tual En ineerin 5.2.1 As soon as a desi gn change is determined to be mandatory or required based on action by the Change Review Committee (CRC), the msponsible desi gn organization will initiate conceptual design activi ties. In order to expedite design changes, design activities may start upon receipt of a Modification Request by the Lead Modification Engineer.

Should the modification be disapproved during mview, then all design acti vi ties will stop upon proper noti ficati on by the Modi ficati on Engineer.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

To ensure that the Operators are aware of pending changes to the configuration of the plant, the Modification Engineer shall ensure that the critical drawings as defined by NMP2 Project procedures at each controlled location are marked with the Modi fication Request number and approval date.

The responsible design organization will assign a Responsible Design Engineer (RDE) who will contact Operati ons and Con structi on to determine schedule mqui rements for desi gn completi on. Cost information will also be compiled (as required by Project Procedures) at this time, and will be supplied to the Project Cost organization.

As requi red by the NMP2 Project Procedures Program, the RDE will contac't other en ginee rin g disciplines, specialists, Con structi on, and Operations as necessary to complete the conceptual design.

5.2.2 The Responsible Desi gn Engineer shall pm pa re the Conceptual Engf nee ring Package, as detailed in the NMP2 Project Procedure s Program, which includes as a minimum:

l. Functional Specification (Appendix 9 or equivalent)
2. Conceptual Safety Evaluation
3. Fire Protection Review
4. ALARA Benefit and Impact Review 5.2.3 ~ The safety evaluation associated with the Conceptual Engineering Package shall be sufficient to establish either that the modification is not safety related or that there is no unreviewed safety question in accordance with 10CFR 50.59. If the Conceptual Safety Evaluation results in an opinion that the modification is safety mlated, then an in-depth safety evaluation shall be performed by the responsible design organization in accordance with the NMP2 Project Procedures Program. lhe responsible desi gn organi zati on will coordinate wi th NMPC Nuclear Licensing to ensue that proper notification is provided to the NRC and approval requested when appropriate.

If there is (or potentially i s) an unreviewed safety question, there must be a re port to NRC accordin g to 10CFR 50. 59. NMPC Nucl ea r Licensing shall manage the preparation of a pm'sentation which should be reviewed by SORC and SRAB according to Technical Specifications.

5.2.4 Afte r the Conceptual En ginee ring Packa ge i s approved wi thin the en ginee rin g group and a conceptual desi gn i s avai 1 able, the Modification Engineer should arrange a review using the Modification Review Form in AP 3.4.1 with the appropriate site, l}.A., Purchasing, Enginee ring, Con structi on, Fi re Protecti on and ALARA pe r sonnel to review the desi gn. The results of the desi'gn review should be documented by the Modi fication Engineer.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

5.2.5 If during the course of conceptual engineering, it becomes evident that the modification, as originally proposed, should be subdivided into two or more separate testable functional designs, Modification Requests shall be generated for each new modi fication. Separate presentations should be prepared for SORC. Each pmsentation should follow the foregoing procedural steps.

( If constraints to completion of portions of the design for individual modifications to support issuance of a complete engineering package at one time are known and workaround plans can be developed, then the Conceptual Engineering package shall contain this information and be presented to SORC for review. Final SORC approval for full implementation/installati on/operati on of any modi ficati on, however, requires the design to be completed and reviewd as detailed in this AP.

5.2.6 The Modi fication Engineer should arrange a SORC aaeting to review nd/or approve the Conceptual Engineering Package. The ROE should attend that SORC meeting; unless, after discussion with the Station Superintendent, involvement i s it is required.

determined The that SORC. Modi no desi gn engineering ficati on Review form in AP-3.4.1 shoul d be pre pa red for the SORC mee tin g. 'the Stati on Superintendent may waive,a conceptual desi gn review for minor modifications at the wquest of Modification Engineer.

5.3 Oesi Phase When SORC%as completed review of the Conceptual Engineering Package, the responsible desi gn organi zati on may proceed 'wi th the complete detailed design. The Final Oesign is culminated by a second SORC review of the safety, evaluation and the Final Oesign documents (See Section 5.3.11). Any required mvisions are incorporated in the design documents and/or Safety Evaluation.

5.3.1 Oesign Criteria responsible For systems as described in the criteria of Appendix A, 10CFR50, the design procedures shall be in conformance with ANSI/ASME N(}A-1 and NgA-2-1 983. The desi gn organi zati on may proceed according to the NMP2 Project Procedures Program.

Approved design documents mlated to Modifications will be noted with the specific Modification Control Number and will not be issued for construction until SORC approval of the final design. Only approved copies of the design documents will be presented to SORC with the final design package. Work copies will be issued in accordance with the NHP2 Project Procedures Program.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

5.3.2 Preliminary Desi cp Review It shall be the objective of the Responsible Design Engineer, that the design package be reviewd for ALARA considerations, installation and inspection requirements and the applicability of any installation plans or inspection plans to be utilized. In addition, any perceived conflicts or impacts of the installation work upon other systems must be addressed. The Responsible Desi gn Engineer and/or any other affected organizations may, at their discretion, schedule a meeting with all parties concerned to ensure that conflicts or impacts, any, are resolved so they will not adversely affect the installation if wo'rk o 5.3.3 Desi gn Production All design, installation and test drawings, instructions and manuals pertaining to the modi ficati on shall be issued in accordance with thi s procedure and appli cable document control procedures as described in the HMP2 Project Procedures Program.

5.3.4 The Responsible performed. Design Engineer, shall review the completed conceptual design to determine into separate distinct modifications if if the modification should be divided this function has not already been A se pa rate Modi ficati on Request Form shall be initiated whenever a new "sub-modification" is identified and the new Modi ficati on Request will be required to undergo full review in accordance with this* proeddure (Refer to Section 5.2.5) 5.3. 5 ihe re sponsibili ty to assure that all materi al s or spa re pa rts speci fied For install ati on have been i denti fied, procured and/or purchased in accordance with all applicable quali ty requirements shall be shared by two organizations.

The Responsible Design Organization shall ensure that all material and equi pment needs to sati sfy the desi gn are i denti fied and speci fied as detailed in appropriate HMP2 Project procedures. In addi ti on, the responsible desi gn or gani zati on shall support the pr ocurement organi zati on as requi red to meet modi ficati on requi rements.

The Responsible Procurement Organizations (i.e., Materials Management and Purchasing) shall ensure the timely procurement, receipt, storage and issuance of requisitioned material and equipment to support the modi fication as, required by appropriate NMP2 Project and Admini strative procedures.

5.3.6 All design, procurement, installation and test activities shall be performed in accordance with applicable codes. Material Defects and None ompli ance s shal 1 be re ported as squired by 10CFR-21 in accordance wi th the NMP2 Project Procedures Program as applicable.

5.3.7 The computeri zed nuclear material s control system managed by the Material s Management Department shall be used for maintaining the status of all materi al s incor porated in the installati on of a modi ficati on. The Responsible Desi gn Organi zati on shall be responsib1e to ensure that information on materials mquirenants are delivered to Materials bhnagement as soon as available. A listing of the data required is shown in Appendix 4.

The %ster Equipment List (MEL) shall also be updated in accordance with NMP2 Project Procedures as requimd.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

5.3.8 Drawing Control Schedule Production and control of required drawings for each modification will be in accordance with the NMP2 Project Procedures Program.

5.3.9 Procedures, Instructions and Manual s Procedures, instructions and manuals required for completion of the modification will be available-through or issued in accordance with the document control procedures as described in the NMP2 Project Procedures Program.

5.3.10 Preliminary Installation Plan When the Responsible Design Engineer determines that design layouts, equi pment, 1 ocati ons, cable routings, pi ping routings, specifications, etc. have been completed in sufficient detail, he sha1 1 arrange to produce preliminary instal1ati on plans an d inspecti on requirem nts.

The installation plan shall be prepared as per Appendix 5. It will include requirements for removal and/or relocation and documentation of exi sting station equipment or facilities and the location and scope of each proposed installation activity module. It i s not expected that suf fi cient detail wi 1 1 be avail able to produce a detailed installation schedule, but tip scope and sequence of each con structi on element shoul d be present. The responsible desi gn engineer should resolve any open items generated as a result of the review of the installation plans by others.

The Supervisor Operations .or his representative will advise on the impact of the modi fication installation plans upon the safety and integrity of the other systems.

2) The l}uality Assurance re pre sentati ve and the installer sha1 1 concur on hold a'nd .witness points for required tests and inspecti ons.
3) The installer will input upon the interrelati onshi p of plans which involve the coordinati on of work between the princi pal crafts such as aechanical, electrical, and instrumentation and control.
4) The ALARA Coordinator or designee, shall review the installation plan and inspection requirements and recommend methods to minimi ze exposures during installati on and inspecti ons.

5.3.11 Final Desi @ Review When the final design has been completed and all documents mviewed for installation, the msponsible design organization shall 'conduct a final review of the safety evaluation and mvise it if required. The ALARA review and fire protection analysis should also be reviewed.

The safety evaluation, by the Modi ficati on ifEngineer, revised, should then be presented to SORC i f necessary, using the SORC evaluati on, the 'a Modification Review Form in AP-3.4.1. If there is no revision to the sa fety fety evaluati on presented wi th the conceptual design should be considered final.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

5.3.12 In addi ti on to the review by SORC, the desi @ de seri pti on, final safety evaluation and mcmmendations for all modifications to plant systems or equipment which constitute changes pursuant to 10CFR50.59 must be submitted to the Safety Review and Audit Board for their review and mcomnendation. Any modi ficati on which involves an unreviewed safety questi on requi res NRC approval pri or to implementati on. Any modi ficati on which involves a Technical Specification change mquims NRC approval prior to acceptance of the modification for operation. Notification to and approvals from the NRC shall be coordinated as requi red by Secti on 5.2.3 of thi s Procedure. Changes to procedures for or pe rtainin g to a sa fety related modification may be made in accordance with Section 6.8 of Technical Speci ficati ons.

5.3.13 Engineering Material s Record During the course of the modi ficati on process, the following documentati on will be generated as required by NMP2 Project Procedures pri or to i ssue of the completed desi gn package for in sta1 1 ati on:

a ~ Specifications for design or purchase

b. Proposals and quotations by vendors c~ Requisitions for materials or services
d. Bid awards and contracts
e. Purchase orders
f. Vendor Certifications, tests and inspections 5.3.14 Install ati on Plans Each modification shall include a comprehensive set of installation plans (Appendix 5) and. inspection plans (Appendix 6 or equivalent) devel oped by the Responsible Desi gn Engineer. It shall be hi s that those plans when taken together will provide foi 'esponsibility complete installati on and testing of the modi ficati on up to the certi ficati on that i t i s lady for acceptance or preoperati onal testin g.

5.4 Installation Plan and Schedulin 5.4.1 Desi gn Completion Transmittal lhe completed design for each modification shall be controlled yia use of the Modi fication bequest number and processed in accordance wi th the NMP2 Project Procedures Program. Coordinati on wi th Operati ons Planning as aequi red in the Project procedures will provi de them wi th the in formati on mqui red to plan and schedule approved plant modi fications.

5.4.1.1 Before endorsing a safety related modification design or portion for implementati on, the Stati on Superintendent or General Superintendent shall be assured that a final safety analysis and review has been completed for all safety related modi fications and that the Modi fi cati on i s in con formance wi th an approved Techni cal Speci ficati on.

AP-6.1 -1 0- March, 1986

5.4.1.2 The required distribution of design documents for construction shall be in accordance with document control procedures as detailed in the NMP2 Project Procedures Program. Hoover, no copies of drawings for construction shall be issued without the knowledge and pemission of the Modi fication Engineer.

5.4. 2 Issue of Modification Work Re uest (MWR)

Upon notice from the Station Superintendent that work planning and implementation of the modification should start, Operations Planning shall issue a Modification Work Request (MWR) (Appendix 7) for each desi gn package delivered for install ati on, and ini ti ate the Work -

Tracking System (WTS) machine record as the official tracking system for modification installation. The MWR shall constitute a cover under which subsequent site documentation on the installation shall be maintained.

If the modification is to be installed by a contract organization, appropri ate MWRs shall be i ssued to the Ni agara Mohawk supervi sor designated responsibility for installation of the modification. He shall be msponsible that data required. for the equipment history and modi ficati on completi on i s obtained and transferred to the Modification Coordinator for installation in the station records.

If Project Contractors are to perform the installati on, the modification installation work may then be sub-assigned in accordaqce with NMP2 Start Up Administrative Procedures (SAP's) as de'line%ted therein. Upon noti ce fran the Stati on Superintendent, Operati on s Planning shall notify Startup and Test as to when the implementation of the modification shall begin.

5.4.3

~ ~ Si te Planning/Scheduling M eting At their discretion, Operations Planning may arrange a meeting with the department supervisors or representatives from all departments to whom installation plans have been i ssued for a particular modi ficati on. 1he meeting should include representatives of Si te guali ty Assurance, the Si te ALARA Group, Radi ati on Protecti on, Technical Support, Operations, and Training. Others may be included as appropri ate. For the more complex modi ficati ons, Engineering repmsentatives should be pn.sent to resolve questions concerning the install ati on plans.

a. Installing Supervi sor s The In stall ati on pe rsonnel aequi resents, 'l Supe rvi sors or pl anne rs shall determine apsed hours, stati on construction equipment mquirenents for each module called for servi ce s the an d in their installation plans. Where a given module is dependent upon another, the intermlations shall be delineated.
b. Install ati on Procedures The In stall ati on Supe rvi sor shall ar range wi th the Supe rvi sor Technical Support or the Responsible Design Organization for the producti on o f any re qui re d proce dure s. The sche dul e for production of these procedures shall be coordinated with ALARA pre-job planning, the schedule for installation and with the overal 1 schedule for pl ant start-up foll owing an outage for modi fication, and/or repair.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

c ~ Tests and Inspections For scheduling purposes, tests and inspecti ons must be integrated wi th the installati on plan. The guali ty Assurance repmsentative shall identi fy the hold and witness points for tests and inspections.

d. ALARA Coordinator The ALARA Coordinator or his ~presentative shall identify any schedule mquirements or special operation or procedures which will have an impact upon schedule or personnel requireaents.
e. Radi ati on Protecti on The Radiation Protection Supervisor or his wpresentative shall arrange for scheduling of radiation protection services.

Operati ons The Supervi sor Operations or hi s mpmsentative shall arrange for the scheduling and production of operating, pm-operational testing and surveillance procedures. AP-8.2 (Surveillance Testing 4 Inspecti on Program) and AP-8.6 (Pr ocedure for Preoperati onal Tests) defines the responsibili ties and activities needed to comply with these requirements. He will also consult with others on the impact of the modification work on the safety and integrity of other station systems.

g, Training The Superintendent Training or his representative shall arrange for producti on of necessary training materials and the scheduling of training for Operati ons and Maintenance personnel. The acti vi ties needed to comply wi th thi s requiremnt are defined in AP-9.0.

h. Schedule Producti on The Operati ons Planning Depa rtment should produce schedules showing the planned start and completion date for each activity, the total elapsed time for the enti re modi ficati on and the msources requi red for each activity. Charts, schedules, elapsed tiaa intervals, and total manpower requirements may be produced by 'compute r to incl.ude in stall ati on work, tests inspections, procedure production, training plans and training.

The schedules for the production of procedures, inspections and tests should be integrated with installation work schedules to assum timely avail abili ty and completi on. Time for the producti on and i ssue of pre requi si te procedures should be considered. Ouality and other tests and inspections should be integrated with the production schedule. (See Section 5.4.3.3).

AP-6.1 March, 1986

5.4.3.1 Producti on of Installati on Procedures

1) Installation procedures for Niagara Mohawk shall be prepared to the requirenents of AP-6.1, AP-7.0 and AP-3.2.1. If the quality provi si on s of these procedure s apply, these procedures shal 1 a@et the applicable requiremnts of ANSI/ASME NgA-1 Requireaant 13, ANSI/ASME NgA-2 Sections 2.4 and 2.8, or other standards as establi shed by Responsible Desi gn Organi zati on. Install ati on procedures shall be reviewed by Responsible Design Organization to these requi remen ts. In stall a ti on procedure s shall be referenced by Responsible Design Organization and indicate any mqui red changes on the de si @ tran smi tta1 . Install ati on procedures shall be reviewed and approved by AP-3.4.1 and AP-2.0. Instal1ati on procedures shall be avail able to the guality Assurance Organization prior to start to work.
2) For modi ficati ons installed by Project organi zati ons, In stall ati on Procedure s wi 1 1 include selected Pro ject and Stati on Procedures whi ch wi 11 be con soli dated via a single Project procedure dedicated fi to Modi cation installati on.

Installati on pr ocedures shall be reviewed and approved by AP-3.4.1 and AP-2.0. Installation procedures shall be available to the guality Assurance Organization prior to start of work.

5.4.3.2 Production of Contractor Procedures Contractor procedures shall be prepa red to the speci ficati on requireaents and should be reviewed by Responsible Desi gn Organization to these requiremnts. Contractor procedures shall be reviewed and approved in accordance wi th AP-3.4.1, Si te Operati on Review Cenni ttee Procedures and AP-2.0, Procedure for Control of Procedures. Approved procedures for installation shall be available to the guality Assurance Or ganization prior to start of work.

5.4.3.3 Issue of Schedule The Operations Planning Department is responsible for preparing and maintaining the installation schedules for each modi fication.

Be fore i ssue of the schedule for implementati on, the Modi ficati on Engineer shall ensure that the ALARA Radiation Protection and guality reviews and the prerequisite procedures for the installation package of the modification have been completed. This documentation shall be furnished to the Installation Supervisor and to the project file via the Modification Engineer as required by the NMP2 Project Procedures Program.

5.4.3.4 Modi ficati on Schedules Work schedules produced by project organizations should be delivered to Operations Planning for integration with schedules by site organizations and to minimize conflicts.

5.4.3.5 Maintenance of Installati on Schedule Operations Planning is responsible for updating work schedules on a weekly basi s.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

inseam ~au on or too> r>cat>on 5.5.1 Initial Documentation at Work Dispatch Location The minimum documentation required to initiate the installation of the modi ficati on shall be in accordance wi th the NMP2 Project procedures and Start-Up Administrative Procedures (SAP's) applicable for the work to be performed. The documentati on package shall include work assignment documents which am prepare'd and processed in accordance with the applicable procedures.

5.5.2 Subsequent Drawings, Instructi ons, Correspondence Unti 1 cl ose out of the modi fica ti on copies of al 1 correspondence, drawings, documents, etc. related to the modification shall be marked wi th the assi gned Modi ficati on Request Number or other oaans to ensure traceabi li ty to Modi ficati on Request Number as requi red by Section 5.7.1. Further defini ti on of document control requi resents an. provided in Section 8 of this procedure.

5.5.3 Assignment of Work Work may cottmence on the modi ficati on whenever authori zed by the General Superintendent or Station Superintendent and upon completion of the following prerequisites:

l. A final safety evaluation reviewed and approved by SORC. For a speci fic modi fication, the Station Superintendent may authorize work to be performed, so long as the modi ficati on i s not connected to an inservice systems, pending final safety evaluati on approval .
2. A modi fi cati on Work Request (MWR) and m femnced documentation have been i ssued. The re ferenced documentation should include the desi gn documents and other documentati on as requi red by applicable Project and Admini strative Procedures.

5.5.4 Start of Work When a definite schedule for starting work is received at the Work Dispatch Station, the installer should obtain the necessary radiation work permits and markups and satisfy other prerequisites as defined in installati on procedures.

5.5.5 Responsibili ties The contractor or Ni a ga ra Mohawk organi za ti on m for install ati on shall proceed in accordance wi th approvedsponsible procedures.

The Stati on Superintendent shall act as the general manager for installation of a modification. Site supervision shall be directly msponsible to him. If a Project Nnager has been designated, he al so sh oui d re port di ectly to the Stati on Supe rin ten dent for scheduling and coordination.

The installing supervisor shall be msponsib1e that all documentation attesting to the completeness and quali ty of the instal ati on are 1 attached to the Modi fication Package or that li sts and schedules attached to the package refer to the location of this documentation.

The Planning Coordinator in the Operations Planning Department shall keep gua1i ty Assurance, Operati ons and the ALARA Coordinator appraised of the installation schedule at all times.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

5.5.6 Out of Plant Organizations In general, out of plant engineering organi zati ons msponsible for the desi gn of modi ficati ons shoul d furni sh fi el d supe rvi si on and inspection personnel to assure that the modification i.s installed as speci fied. Arrangeaants for the cooperative use of station forces and for the receipt and control of material shall be coordinated with the Stati on Superintendent. The facilities of the Material s Management Departm nt shall be used to the maximum extent possible.

5.5.7 Changes During Modi ficati on Installation Changes which may affect the original safety analysis must be processed through the same procedures as the original modification.

Documentation of changes shall be processed in accordance with the NMP2 Project Procedures Program. In ti addi on, chan ge s to installations excluded from this procedure (Section 4.1) which may affect the ori ginal safety analysi s must al so be processed in accordance with this procedure.

5.5.8 Material s and Equi pment All material and equipment to be installed for the modification shall be controlled and handled in accordance with the applicable Project procedures or Administrative procedures.

5.5.9 Tests and Inspecti ons All tests and inspecti ons performed as part of the Constructi on installation shall be in accordance with the applicable Project and Admini strati ve procedures.

5.5.10

~ ~ Logs and Data Lists The Document Control In forma ti on System (DCIS) shall be used to consoli date all the latest revi si ons of drawings, procedures, speci ficati on s, etc. pertinent to the in sta1 1 ati on of a modification. Changes to such material subsequent to a modification shall be in accordance with the applicable NMP2 Project procedures and thi s Admini strative procedure.

5.5.11 Compl e ti on a 0 The in sta 1 ler (s ) shall ensure that a 1 1 porti on s of the modifications are complete and functionally tested for operation as specified in the installation plan indicating work completion and report to his supervisor that the equipment and system is ready fot pre-operational or acceptance testing and/or final inspecti on.

b. The w sponsible supe rvi sor or project engineer to whom the installer sports shall examine the completed work package and document his review by signature and date.

5.5.12 Quality Control Quality Control Work activities mlated to installed equipment shall be performed in accordance wi th the applicable QA/QC program re qui remen ts.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

S re 5 5 13 Defects, Nonconformances Deficiencies i denti fied during constructi on shall be absolved in accordance wi th the NMP2 Project Procedures Program or si te pr ocedures as applicable.

5.5'.l4 Acceptance for Test Pmoperati onal tests shall be performed in accordance with AP-8.6.

Successful completion of a preoperational test according to AP-8.6 is ordinarily prerequisite to full acceptance for operation.

5.6 Acce tance for 0 ration 5.6.1 Procedures for Operation and Test The procedures noted in Section 5.4.3f should be available at the time of completion of the installation work. lhese procedures shall have been reviewed and approved according to AP-2.0 and as required by the Technical Specifications.

Operations and technical personnel shall be trained in the new or revised Operating and Test procedures prior to test and acceptance.

5.6.2 Testing and Operation 5.6.2.1 After installation is completed, a pm-operational test or suitable acceptance run or inspecti on i s required for each stati on modi fication which involves changes or additions to components or systems involved in the operation of safety related systems. lhis may be an incorporation into existing pre-operational tests. %e details of the pmparation and conduct of pm-operational tests is contained in AP-8.6.

The Techni cal Support department wi 1 1 arrange a pre-operati onal test. The Responsible Desi @ Organi zati on should be consulted for any anomalies in the test results. lhese anomalies must be resolved prior to placing the system or component in service.

5.6.2.2 After the pre-operational test is completed, the Responsible Testing Organi zati on repre sentati ve shal 1 submi t the test re sul ts to the Responsible Engineering Organization, SORC, guality Assurance 5 SRAB for review and approval as required by the AP-8.6 and the Technical Speci ficati ons.

5.6.2.3 Once or the a pre-operational rati onal test, if or acceptance applicable, has te st has been approved by SORC been completed, the ope modi ficati on shall be reviewed for acceptance by Operati ons by completing the modi fication operability acceptance form. (Appendix 8)

To ensure that the Ope rators am aware of completed (i .e.,

operationally accepted) changes to the configuration of the plant, the Modification Engineer shall ensure that the critical drawings at each controlled location are marked with the modification completion date. In addition, a copy of the modification package drawings will be stapled to the cri tical drawings. An "as-bui1 t" drawing i ssue will be completed as required by Section 8.3.1 of this procedure.

S7 Coordinated Project Management AP-6.1 March, 1986

5.7.1 Modi fication Request Log The Modi ficati on Engineer i s responsible for assuring that each modification is entered into the Modification Request Log starting wi th the concepti on of the modi ficati on. All subsequent documents

.generated as a part of a specific modification shall be traceable to the Modification Request Number. (See Sections 5.1.0 and 5.1.3) 5.7.2 Integrated Work Schedule and Report Operations Planning will publish an integrated schedule showing all planned modification, major maintenance and major testing operations which will be concurrently in progress. This will be projected to the conclusion of the outage during which modifications am being installed.

6.0 CLOSEOUT PHASE 6.1 The Modification Engineer is responsible for the preparation of the Modi ficati on Cl oseout Checkli st (Appendi x .9).

6.2 Devel opment of as-built drawings shall be as required by Secti on 8.3.1.

6.3 The Modi ficati on Engineer shall coordinate wi th the Responsible Desi gn Engineer to perform a final review of the as-bui 1 t installation and compare with the safety and ALARA evaluations. This review shall be docwented and noted in the Modi fication Closeout Checklist (Appendix 8). All concerns identified shall be resolved in accordance with the applicable Project Procedures. Actual deviations are consi dered modi ficati on revi si ons and are processed per thi s pr ocedure.

The ALARA Coordinator shall prepare a post ALARA Evaluation report in accordance wi th RP-8.

7.0 RESPONSIBILITIES This section is a recap of duties noted throughout the text of the procedure. However, also listed are duties which are implied in the body of the procedure, some of which are derived from the engineering flow chart, Appendix 10, and others which are related only to the forms in the appendices.

7.1 Site Or anization 7.1.1 Stati on Superintendent - The Stati on Superintendent i s responsible for:

(1) Approving modifications using the Modification'Request fom.

(2) Recceeending pri ori ty group for modi ficati on through participation in the Change Review Conmittee.

(3) Assignment of site contacts for modifications.

(4) Assuring timely review, by SORC 8 SRAB, of safety evaluations.

AP-6.1 -1 7- Ma rch, 1986

Si te Contact Site Contacts for a given modification could be from site technical support staff, maintenance staff or the project construction staff.

In any event, the site contacts am responsible for:

(1) Interface with the Station Superintendent to assure proper site mview of conceptual design (AP-3.4.1).

(2) Attend project metings, as mquired, or arrange an alternate to attend.

(3) Coor dinate fiel d install ati on concerns which do not require engineering assistance. 'the site contact may not be responsible for install ati on.

(4) Ensure that modification is installed, tested and accepted for operati on in accordance wi th the requirements establi shed (Appendi x 7)

(5) Ensure that ALARA consi derati ons are incorporated into the phases of install ati on.

In stal le r The installer for a given modification could be from the maintenance sta ff, techni cal support, or Project Construe ti on forces. lhe installer is responsible for:

(1) Ensuring modification is installed in accordance with the design requirements including installati on and inspection plans.

(2) Ti oaly noti ficati on to Responsible Desi gn Organi zati on of proposed deviations to design requirements in accordance with the NMPC Project Procedures Program and Admini strative Procedures.

(3) Tiaaly completi on of install ati on documentati on and as-built drawin gs.

(4) Ensuring contractor documentation is provided and included with the work package.

(5) Noti fying O.C. of impending holdpoints.

Supervisor of Technical Support (1) Coordinator of assignments of Site Contacts (Appendix 1).

(2) Timely development of modification preoperational tests or other final test. Engineering assi stance may be requested, i f aequi red (AP-8.2).

AP-6.1 -1 8- March, 1986

7.1.5 ALARA Coordinator (1) ALARA engineering services during all phases of modifications perforated.

(2) f ALARA Plan (i mquired) for modi fication installation.

(3) f ALARA tracking (i required) during installati on (4) ALARA Review of Pmoperational procedures.

(5) Post ALARA evaluati on.

7.1.6 Start-Up 5 Test (1) Coordinate the assi gnoant, tracking and completion of modification installation activities in accordance with the NMP2 Start-Up Admini strative Procedures.

(2) Coordinate the performance of Pmoperational Tests as directed by the Station Superintendent.

7.2 En neerin Or ani zati on 7.2.1 The NMPC Manager of Project Engineering - The NMPC Manager of Project Engineering is msponsible for:

(1) Ensuring that the modifications, which have been approved by the Stati on Superintendent and the Chan ge Review Caani ttee, are properly planned and staffed for timely implementation.

(2) Assi @ment of 'efgfneering personnel.

(3) Ensuring that all engineering documents and drawings are developed in a timely fashion.

(4) Assurance that all applicable Engineering Procedures are met.

7.2.2

~ ~ Lead Modification Engineer - The NMPC Lead Modification Engineer is responsible for the following:

(1) Ensuring that all modi fi cati ons have properly completed Modi fication Request forms - (Appendix 1).

(2) Conducting modification status review oaetings as mquimd.

(3) Assigning a NMPC Modification Engineer for each modification and ensuring that Responsible Design Organizations have engineering teams/personnel assi@ed for all modi fications.

(4) Preparing input for modi fication status summary reports.

(5) Processing and controllirig Modi ficati on Requests.

(6) Ensuring the proper implementati on of applicable NMP2 Project Procedures in support of modi fications.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

~

7.2.3 Modi ficati on Engineers - The NMPC Modi ficati on Engineer is responsible for the following on all assigned modifications.

(1) Receive, mview and process Modification Request Forms for each modi fication and assignment of control numbers.

(2) Coordination of conceptual design and SORC review.

(3) Ensuring cl ose coordinati on by the responsible desi gn organization with the site contacts and other site participants designated by the Station Superintendent and guality Assurance.

(4) Doctmntation of meetings held for speci fic modi fications.

(5) Coordinate the proper preparation of Safety evaluations by the f

re spon sible desi gn organi zati on and si gnof by NMPC Project Engineering.

(6) Ensure the coordinati on of reviews by the responsible desi gn organi zati on . for fire protecti on and ALARA and ensure coordination with the appropriate site personnel.

(7) Presentation of safety evaluations to SORC. (AP-3.4.1).

(8) Coor dinati on of final desi gn in accordance wi th the aequi md schedul e.

(9) Review or assist in the development of the pre-operational test f

procedure (AP-8.2) i requested by Technical Support. Resolve any anomalies as requested by Technical Support.

(10) Assuring that as-built information is incorporated into the final drawings in accor dance wi th NMP2 Project Procedures Program.

(ll) Ensure the close coordination~of all planning and scheduling activities with Operations Planning for each modification.

(12) Ensure the incorporation of ALARA considerations into design and install ati on planning.

(13) Maintenance of the modification record.

(14) Close-out of the modi fication record.

7.2.4

~ ~ Responsible Design Engineers - All Responsible Design Engineers are responsible for the following on each assigned modi ficati on:

(1) Prepare manhour and equipment estimates as required by Project Procedures.

(2) Compli ance wi th the approved functi onal speci ficati on or recomoand revi si on.

(3) Provi ding schedule in formati on to the appropri ate Planning/Scheduling organi zati on.

(4) Completion of the drawings.

(5) Support procureoant of materi al and equi pment as detailed in NMP2 Project Procedures.

(6) Pmparation of speci fications.

(7) Conduct and documentation of a preliminary design review of the marked up desi gn wi th the procedure si te contact, installers, guali ty Control, and ALARA contacts.

(8) Devel opment and/or mview of si te install ati on procedures to functional speci ficati on requirements and recommending changes as required.

(9) Pre parati on of the requi rements for install ati on. lhi s coul d include speci ficati on s, change recmmendati on s, MSE list review, drawings, and installation plan.

(10) Assuring technical manuals are obtained from vendors, reviewed, and distributed in accordance with Project Procedures.

(11) Disposition of drawing change requests.

(12) Arrange updating of drawings to the as-built condi ti on after installation in accordance with Project Procedures.

(13) Incorporating ALARA con si derati ons into desi gn and in stal 1 ati on planning.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

7.2.5 Lead Scheduling En gi neer - The Lead Schedulin g 'E'n ginee r i s msponsible for the following on all modi fications wf thin Project En gineerin g.

(1 ) Aequi si ti on of data necessary to the plan and schedule the engineering of modi ficati ons.

(2) Devel opment of schedules.

(3) Providing planning information to the Operations Planning for schedulin g.

(4) Reporting status to the Modi ficati on Engineer any mqui red modi fication which is in conflict with the schedule.

(5) Collecting of manhour estimates.

7.2.6 Project ALARA Coordinator (1) ALARA engineering input during the project conceptual phase.

(2) ALARA preliminary design review.

(3) Final ALARA design review.

7.3 guali t Assurance Or ani zati on 7.3.1 Manager of guali ty Assurance - 1he Nna ger of guali ty Assurance responsibilities are as follows:

(1) Assignment of Site and System ()uality Assurance personnel to the project as required.

(2) Assuring modification is designed in accordance with engineering procedure s.

(3) Assuring modification is installed in accordance with site and NMP2 Project procedures as applicable.

(4) Assuring materi al i s procured and contracts are placed in accordance with NMP2 Project procedures.

guality Assurance Contact - guality Assurance contact is wsponsible for the following:

(1) Providing initial input at the preliminary design stage mlative to in spec ti on s and other guali ty Assurance requi remen ts as required by NMP2 Project procedures.

(2) Assuring in specti ons a re performed as required by contract mquirenents or site installation procedures.

(3) Monitoring the project during engineering and construction to assure compliance with regulations, standards and speci fications.

(4) Coordinating the gA review of the final document packa ge to assure that the modi fication documents are in accordance with establi shed requirements.

8.0 PROSPECT RECORDS AND CONTROLS AP-6.1 March, 1986

8el Modi fica ti on En 'eer A Modification Engineer shall be designated to keep track of the status of all temporary and permanent modifications. A log (Appendix

. 2) of all modi ficati ons shall be maintained for the stati on modification files. Whenever the Modification Engineer is inforaed that a proposal has been accepted by the Change Review Caanittee Stati on Superintendent or General Superintendent as a stati on modification, the Modification Engineer sha-11 assign a number to the modi fication (Appendix 1). All required records and reports shall be traceable to the control number assigned to each modification. The flow chart (Appendix 10) attached to this procedure will assist in vi suali zing the steps involved in the accompli shment of a modi ficati on.

8.2 F11ee Docuaentati on related to each modi ficati on will be maintained as aequi red by the document control procedures and NMP2 Records Management Program as detailed in the NMP2 Project Procedures Program. Traceability for records related to specific modifications will be provi ded through the control number assi gned to each Modi fication Request. The mquired content of each file shall be established in accordance with those requiremnts.

8..3 Desi Docutl.nt Revi si ons ~ 'O.

r;P Revi sions to drawings, specifications, instructions, etc. shall be prepared in accordance with applicable design controls procedures in the NMP2 Project Procedures Program.

8.3.1

~ ~ As-bui 1 t doctments:

As-built documents shall be prepared in accordance wi th the applicable NMP2 Project Procedures Program.

8.3.2 Upon completion of the modi fication, approved copies of new and revised drawings shall be issued in accordance with the NMP2 Records Managem nt Program and the NMP2 Project Procedures Program.

8.4 Machine Records Log The basic records for modifications are indexed and controlled on the following set of sortable machine records logs:

presently

a. Modi fication Log Thi s i s a computer ~cord maintained by the Modi ficati on Engineer to present the schedule and status of all pending and working modi ficati ons.

different 8.5 Forms in Appendix The appendices attached to this procedure contain forms referred to in the procedure which an. intended to assi st in management of modi ficati ons. In order to provi de the flexibility to adapt the forms to size modifications, the forms may be adapted to a speci fic modi ficati on.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

9.0 APPENDIX

SUMMARY

~I I

Appendi x Numbe r Fi le Locati on ~Lft ~ 1i Tittle Si te Mod. Engineer Modification Request Form Si te Mod. Engineer Modi fication Log Si te E Resp. Design Engineer Functi onal Speci ficati ons Si te/Eng Z002 Desi gn Eng/Materials Material and Equipment Management Control Log 5 Eng F Desi gn Engineering Installation Plan 6 Eng F Desi gn Engineering Inspecti on Plan 7 Site . A Ops. Ping./Installer Modi fication Work Request 8 Si te K Site Tech. Support Mod Operability Acceptance 9 Si te Z007 Mod. Engineer Modification Closeout 10 Flow Chart AP-6.1 March, 1986

APPENDIX 1 MODIFICATION REQUEST FORM INSTRUCTIONS lhe title is a description in a very few words.

1.2 Provide a sufficient descri pti on of the modi fications to permi t evaluation of the scope and benefit. Include mference to initiating document.

1.3 a. Note the reason for change by checking the appropriate box.

b. If the modification is to consist of replacement of an existing system or component, outline the specification or perfonnance of the existing system and explain what variations are desired in the proposed system or component.
c. If the modification consists of the addition of new systems or components, outline the deficiencies in the existing plant or plant systems and explain the improvements in plant performance or safety which may be accompli shed.

1.4 Provide mference document for change. List any documentation which woul d assi st in the scope defini ti on or justi ficati on of the modi fication. For minor modi fications, attach a marked up elementary or P&ID to show change.

1.5 Nhat do you believe will be the safety class?

QC Class Safety Related 2 - Reliability Related 3 - None of the Above Enter what priority group the modi fication should be completed by and any appropriate remarks.

1.7 Originator si @ s hi s naos and gi ve s to hi s supervisor for review and appr oval.

1.8 Supervisor signs his approval or adds a memorandum citing his reasons for di sa pprova1 . He then forwa rds the reque st to the NMPC Lead Modi fi cati on Engineer for 1 ogging and numbering. Proposal s originating off site shall be routed to the attention of the NMPC Lead Modi fi cation Engineer.

lhe Modification Engineer accords the request in the Modification Log and assigns a control number.

2.1 The recommended desi gn organi zati on, when utilizing AP-6.1, wi ll always be Nuclear Engineerin g. Subsequent assi gnment i s at the discretion of the Manager of Nuclear Engineering.

2.2 Not applicable for AP-6.1.

.AP-6.1 March, 1986

APPENDIX 1 MODIFICATION RE VEST FORM INSTRUCTIONS Upon mceipt of a mquest for modification or addition, the Station Superintendent or General Superintendent will approve or disapprove a request as noted on the Modification Request form. He will also establi sh the prf ori ties for further implementati on of the modification and affirm or alter the recommendation concerning the desi cp organizati on. The Stati on Superintendent or General Superintendent should confer with the Manager of Desi@ E'ngfneering on the modi ficati on being con si dered through the Change Review Commi ttee.

The project priority is assigned by completing the priority group section of the Modi fication Request Form.

3.1 After review by the Station Superintendent or General Superintendent, the Modification Log is updated to show the disposition and date.

lhe Modification Engineer mcords the transmittal on the Request Form.

lhe Request Form and attachments am then sent to the organization desi @ated to perform the design engineering.

3.2 Qe Manager of Nuclear Engineering concurs with the assi@ment and pri ority group.

3.3 The Modification Engineer updates the Modification Log.

AP-6.1 Ma rch, 1986

swaMI.M46,a MODIFICATIONREQUEST FORM

~ ~

)

~

UNIT: Cl 3 CI 2 1.1 MODIRCATIDNTITLE 1.2 DESCRIPTIN OF 1.3REASONFOR CHANGE: QREGUVmRY QSAFETY QEFRCIENCY QALARA QPUHTOPERAB1LITY/MAINTAIMILITY Q OTHER

1.4 REFERENCES

NRC REGULATION CODE OR SQNGARD SYSTEM NO COMPONENT NO. EQUIPMENT Dl%NNG P NON COMFDII 1.6 MODIFICATION CLASS: qC CLASS Q I Q II CI Itl ~ NRC SAFETY RELATED Q YES Q NO 1.6 REOOMMEROEO PRIORITY GROUP REMNIRR 1.7 ORIGINATOR NAME DEPT 1.9 APPROVED 1.9 MOD. CONTROL NO. N Y MX MOD. COORD.

2.1 RECOMMENDED DESIGN ORGANIZATION Cl NUCLEAR'ENG. Q TECH, SUPPORT WITH NUCLEAR ENG. SUPPORT RECOMMENDED SITE CONTACT SUPERVISOR TECH. SERVICES GATE 2.2 PROPOSAL Q APPROVED Q TABLE. RECONSIDER DATE Q DISAPPROVED TECHNICAL SUPEIIINTENOENT 2.3 PROPOSAL Cl APPAOVED Q TAKE. RECONSIDER GATE Q DISAPPROVED PRIORITY GROUP: 1. Cl NEED PRIOR TO NEXT OUTAGE 2. Cl NEED NEXT OUTAGE 3. Q WANT PRIOR TO NEXT OUTAGE

4. Q WANTS NEXT OUTAGE 6. Q WANTS OUTAGE INDEPENDENT 6. Q DEFER PAIOAITIZING
7. CI OTHER ASSIGN TD: CI NUCLEAR ENGINEERING Q TECHNICAL SUPPORT WITH NUCLEAR ENG. SUPPORT OR GENelAL SUPEIIINTENOENT

~

1 3.1 UPDATE MODIRCATION UFi Cl DISAPPROVED Q AEVIEW REQUESTED ON Q TRANSMIT MODIFICATIONAEQUEST TO DESIGN GROUP SENT TO 32 CONCUR ON ASSIGNMENT AND PRIORITY GROUP.

33 INITIATEWORK TRACKING DATA FILE NXL CXÃOIÃlN GATE OISTIIISOTINL PMT 1 IWNTEI SITE RLE: l%RT 2 ITELLlhg ORIQNATOL'

'R 1 EPIN) O STBt LIENGI. N.~'lT l (G'IOLI 0 STEP S.I CXL CÃNL AP-6 .1 M~~~I 1nOG

APPENDIX 2 MODIFICATION LOG This is a machine record to be maintained by the Modification Engineer.

The data for each modification should be maintained on a single line or set of conti guous lines. The data Abbreviations may be used on the computer printout.

columns may be as li sted.

Column No. ~Headfn Request Number

2. Modi fication Title
3. Request date 4, Approved/Di sapproved, Date
5. Assi gned to Engineering/Tech. Services
6. Draft Mod. Work Request, Number, Date
7. 8udget Request Date, i f non-Project scope modification
8. 8udget Approval Date, if non-Project scope modi fication
9. Njor Order Number, if non-Project scope modi fication
10. Major Order Date, i f non-Project scope modification
11. Conceptual Design Schedule Complete Date
12. Conceptual Design 4 Safety Analysis Date SORC Review
13. Final Desi gn Safety Analysi s Date SORC Review
14. Deliver Design to Site Schedule/Actual Date 15.

I Start Installati on Schedule/Actual Date

16. Complete Install ati on Schedule/Actual Date
17. Acceptance for Operation Schedule/Actual Date AP-6.1 Ma rch, 1986

APPENDIX 3 FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION FORM INSTRUCTIONS

l. Enter Modification Title.
2. Enter Modification Control Number.
3. Enter modification description.

4'. Enter system specifications.

5. Enter quality assurance requirements.
6. Prepare safety eval uation and attach. The safety eval uation may be prepared by Nuc . Licensing.
7. Include any attachments zs required by engineering procedures. Additional sheets shall be attached, if required. The Responsible Design Engineer shall attach calculations, analysis, drawings, as appl icabl e.

&.'he Responsible Design Engineer signs that he has prepared the specification.

9. Lead Modification Engineer signs off that the engineering review has been completed and includes any attachments as required.

The compl eted form with attachments shall be reviewed by SORC per AP-3.4.1 using modification review form.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

APPENDIX 3 FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION

1. Modi fication

Title:

2. Modification Control No. N Y M LE

. 3. Detailed Descri tion:

4. S stem S cification:
5. ualit Re uirements:
6. Safety Eva1uati on Prepared and Attached. Site Eng Date
7. Attachments:
8. Prepared by: Design Eng
9. Eng Review Completed: Lead Mod. Eng Date AP-6.1 March, 1986

APPENDIX 4 MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT (R 4 <<

CONTROL LOG f2. d ..8.1)

Column No. ~lb ad< n System Number

2. Equi pment Piece Number
3. Name of Equipment or Material
4. guanti ty Requisition Number
6. Date of Requisition
7. Purchase Order Number
8. Date of Purchase Order
9. Delivery@ate Requested
10. Delivery Date Promised Date Received Materials Management Recei pt Inspecti on, OK, Reject-Return or Hold
13. qua 1 i ty Assurance In specti on
14. Material Issue Number
15. Date of Material Issue
16. guantity on Nterial Issue
17. Date Installed
18. guanti ty Installed The Materi al Control accord shoul d show the di sposi ti on of all material purchased by additional accords of installation i f necessary.
19. Date returned to stores
20. guantity returned to stores AP-6.1 March, 1986

I APPENDIX 5 INSTALLATION PLAN FORM INSTRUCTIONS Enter Modi fication Title.

1.2 Enter modi fication control number and design transmittal.

1.3 Engineering should prepare the installation plan by completing Steps 1.5, 1.6, 1.7. Engineering should blacken in checked column where mqui red.

Concurrence should be obtained by engineering on the original issue from gA and the installer.

1.5 Indicate any references specifically applicable to the plan.

1.6 Indicate the recmmended sequence number of the activity. Sequence may be changed to adapt to field conditions.

1.7 Enter a description of the activity to be completed.

1.8 Enter any procedures, drawings, specifications, and/or technical manuals mquired to complete the fctivity.

1.9 Engineering should blacken in the first column where a signoff is mquired. When the activities are completed, the Installer and g.A.

should sign off next to the blackened boxes.

NOTE: This form may be wvised by the wf th Engineering concurrence.

Installer or gA after it is issued AP-6.1 Ma rch, 1986

APPE 5 1.1 Mod. Ti tie INS~ . ION PLAN 1 2 Mod. ont. o.

In s ta 1 le r 1.5

Reference:

SEg ACTIVITY NO. DESCRIPTION REFERENCE S G 0 S A E AP-6.1 Na rch, 1986

I 41

~ ~ ~ ~

APPENDIX 6 INSPECTION PLAN FORM INSTRUCTIONS 1.1 Enter modi fication title.

1.2 Enter modification control number and design transmittal.

1.3 Engineering should prepam the installation plan by completing steps 1.5 and entering the components in 1.6.

1.4 Concurrence should be obtained by engineering on the original issue from gA and the installer.

1.5 Indicate any mferences specifically applicable to the plan.

1.6 Enter the inspection requirements in the column below the heading.

Inspection requirements should be completed and the form included as part of the applicable si te pr ocedure or contract speci ficati on, where applicable. %i s should be determined by the installer for site procedures and the desi gn engineer for contracts.

1.7 Enter the component identification number in the headings above the columns.

1.8 Engineering should blacken in the first colunn under the check where a si @off i s required. Ken the inspecti ons are completed, the Installer or g.A. should sign off next to the blackened box.

NOTE: 1 ) Thi s form (or equivalent forms included in site installation procedures or contract speci ficati ons) may be completed to include inspection requirements and included in site procedures at the determination of the installer.

2) This form may be mvised by the Installer or i ssued with Engineering concurrence.

gA after it is

3) This form should be prepared by engineering when included in a si te proce dure and the si te proce dure i s appl i cable to the modi fication being installed.
4) This form should be prepared by the Design Engineer and included in contracts when applicable.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

APP 6 1.1 Mod. T)tie Sheet , Cont'd on q.A. ECTION PLAN 1.2 Mod. ont. o. N F DT spare y: / 1.4 Concurrence: A / In sta1 le r /

1.5

Reference:

om onen n cat>on um ers 1.6laments nspecti on nsta er nsta er nsta er nsta er qui SGDAE G D DA E IG DA E SI DATE SIG DATE SIG DATE AP-6.1 March, 1986

~ 1

~s

~ ) I ~

t APPENDIX 7 MODIFICATION WORK RE VEST FORM INSTRUCTIONS

~Hearn Uni t Record the Station Unit Number Date Date the Modification Coordinator first Assigns a MWR to indicate a job number and Modi ficati on Request Number, Modi ficati on Control Number - Unit, Year, Major Order, Log Number. MWR Job. No. - ibis is the number assigned to the Modification Request by the computer.

The title of the Modi fication as contained on the Modi ficati on Request.

1.2 lhe Modification as contained on the Modification Request.

1.3 Record the account number as contained on the Major Order and the date of the Ma jor Order. (The Account Number contains the Ma jor Order Number).

1.4 Check the Safety and guali ty Cl assi ficati on. Record the documentation mference of the final design safety evaluation and the ALARA evaluation.

1.5 Note the SORC approval or disapproval of the Preliminary/Final Design.

If a contractor is to perform the work, list the contractor, purchase order, and mquisitions as appropriate.

Operations Planning issues the MWR to the applicable Construction Services for contractors. Remove Part 4.

department or 2.1 lhi s is the name of the supervisor receiving the MWR for schedule planning along with an Installation Plan from Engineering.

2.2 Enter the desi gn tran smi ttal number and indicate other re femnce docuoentati on attached.

2.3 List the procedures or attach a procedure list.

2.4 Check the reason implementati on.

if any that the MWR is, being held for later 2.5 Check i f the ALARA review of the installation plan is completed and the plan approved for ALARA or if the MWR is on hold for ALARA. List the ALARA coordinators nave approving or holding.

2.6 Check f i the installation plan review for guality is complete and the plan approve by telephone.

for installation or on hold. Check if the OK received List the gA supervisor's name approving or holding.

Remove Part 3 and forward copy to the Modification Engineer.

AP-6.1 March, 1986

h

~ ~ ~ ~

APPENDIX 7

'cCont.

3.1 Name the per son assi gned the MWR for install ati on and the date assi gned.

3.2 Give the Scheduled start date and the dates the gA department, the ALARA group, and the SSS were notified when the work would start.

3.3 When the work cal led for on the MWR i s complete, check off by cate gory that all the doc ultan tati on requi red to atte st that the modification was installed as engineered is assembled and attached to the MWR at least by reference. Check also that complete lists of safety Markups, RWPs and gCIRs are also attached.

3,4 Enter any remarks applicable to the completed modification .

3.5 The Installer signs that the work called for on the MWR and in the attached Installation Plan and Schedule is complete as directed.

4.1 The imnediate or Department Supervisor signs that he has reviewed the MWR package, inspected the work, and is satisfied that the MWR has been completed as required.

4.2 An 'uthorized guality Assurance representative signs that an inspecti on of the docmantati on package i s completed and that the portion of the modification called for on this MWR is completed as requi red.

a.3 The Stati on Shi ft Supervi sor or authori zed Technical Department Supervisor signs that he accepts this portion of the modification for testing and final inspection prior to operation.

4.4 The Operations Planning Department logs out the MWR. Remove Part 2 and forward the copy to the Eng. Mod. Group.

AP-6.1 Ma rch, 1986

a S.'NIASARA u MOHAWK s ~

~

a I

aIOD .

g'. 4 C31 02 MODIFICATIONTITLE

1.2 DESCRIPTION

1.3 ACCOUNT 1.4 MODIRCATION IS 0 SAFETY RELATED 0 NON SAFETY RELATED QC CLASS 0 I 0 II C3 III 0 EQ FINAL SAFETY EWLUATION REFERENCE N Y M LE ALARADESIGN EVALUATIONREFERENCE N Y M LE 1.5 SORC REVIEW OF FINAL DESIGN 0 ACCEPTED 0 DISAPPROVED DATE 1.6 CONTRACTOR PAL REQ.

1.7 ISSUED BY SITE PLANNING DATE 2 .1 RECENED BY 22 REFERENCE DOCUMENTATION ATTACHED:

a 0 DESIGN TRANSMITTAL N Y M LF DT

b. C3 INSTALLATIONPLAN c. C3M 4 E LIST d.0 DRAWING UST e. QOTHER ATTACHMENTS 2.3 PROCEDURE LIST: QATTACHED QNA

/ / / / / /

2.4 ON HOLD DUE TO: 0 PARTS 0 SORC REVIEW 0 ENGINEERING 0 PLANT SHUTDOWN REQ.

2.5 AUNA REVIEW Q YES 0 HOLD ALARA COORDINATOR DATE 2.6 OA REVIEW r DATE 3.1 ASSIGNED TO DATE 3.2 SCHEDULED START DATE QA NOTIFIED DATE gag ggPRED [ply ALA!NNOTIFIEO OATE 3.3 ATTACHED COMPLETED DOCUMENTATION:

a. 0 INSTALLATIONPLAN f. C3 NARRATIVE

SUMMARY

II. 0 OTHER ATTACHMENTS:

b. 0 PROCEDURES g. C3 LIST OF MARKUPS
c. 0 MATERIAL ISSUES h. 0 LIST OF RWP'S
d. 0 LIST OF REMOVED EQUIPMENT i. QLIST OF QIR'S
e. 0 INSPECTION REPORTS J. 0 TRANSMITTALFOR SIGNED PRINTS 3.4 REMARKS 3.5 WORK REQUEST TASKS COMPLETED BY SUPERVISOR REVIEW BY DATE OA REVIEW OF DOCUMENT PACKAGE DATE ACCEPTED FOR FINAL INSPECTION AND TEST BY C3 SSS 0 SUP V DATE 4.4 LOGGED COMP/CLOSED BY SITE PLANNING DATE OISTIIINmNI:PNIT 1 (WHITE}SITE RLE; MT 2 (TELU}W}E}6}llN00. GROIN'SA (PIICh@~PP.6 WRg80RQ.: PNT4 IG'161} e STEP 1.T MOO. COONl AP R 1 a7 M+~+w s Aos

'I ~

~

~

APPENDIX 8 MODIFICATION OPERABILITY ACCEPTANCE FORM INSTRUCTIONS Enter modi fication title 1.2 Enter mod.control no.-

2.1 Attach a copy of the appli cable safety evaluati ons (for Ops Supervisor infomation) and check that they have been SORC reviewd.

Reference Site Document Log for APN-3.4.1 documents.

2.2 Review the si te document document 1 og and enter the desi gn tran smi ttal s installed for this modification.

2.3 Review the si te 1 og for the required test for thi s modi ficati on and check that they have been sati sfactorily completed.

2.4 Enter any operating procedures affected by or requi red for thi s modification.

2.5 Contact Nuclear Li cen sin g and enter any technical speci fica ti on s affected by or required for this modification.

'2.6 Indicate any comments significant to the completion review.

2.7/2.8 Si te Contact or Supervi sor and guali ty Assurance review the completion fom.

Ope ra ti on s Supe rvi sor accepts modi fica ti on 3.2 Document Control contacts Engineering and updates operating drawings per updated Engineering Drawing Li st.

3.3 Office Supervisor notifies Modification Engineer of need to initiate property in service repor t. Modi ficati on Engineer signs when completed.

3.4 Acceptance form is closed on site document log.

Di stributi on: Ori ginal pl aced in modi ficati on file. Copies distributed to Station Superintendent, Eng. Planning, Project Engineer and Lead Modi ficati on En gf nee r.

Addi ti ona1 di stri buti on s to be made by Si te and Engineering Modi fication Group as requested.

AP-6.1 Ma rch, 1986

~

~ ~

~ r ~ ~ ~

cI 1.0 HEAOING

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

555lllm)55%5%

2 0 COMPLETION ITEVIEVl

~ ~

~ ~ 8 0 0 C 0~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ K~C h QS ~

IIIIIIIIIII5III IIHIIIIIIII5lll .

IIIIIFIIIIIHIII IIHllllllll5III.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIII . IIEIIIIIIIIBIII.

~ 0 ~ ~ 4

~ ~

~ ~ i ~50 ~ 5~ ~ S ~

~ ~ ~ ~

~ i ~

~ ~ l~ ~

3.0 ACCEPTANCE

~ ~ ~ ~ P OO ~

~ ~ ~ ~ l~

~ Dl ~ ~ ~ ~ C E ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0~ ~ '

APPENDIX 9

~ ~

MODIFICATION CLOSEOUT FORM INSTRUCTIONS

'EADING Enter Modification title 1.2 Enter modification control number. The M digit shall be the major order i f written.

1.3 Not applicable for AP-6.1.

1.4 Indi cate if modi ficati on i s cl osed due to i t being canceled or modi fication control number massi gned.

1.5 Modification Engineer mviews form and distributes accordingly for cl oseout acti on.

2.0 CLOSEOUT ACTION As each closeout action is completed or marked N/A for the subject modification, the msponsible department should sign and complete and return to the Modi ficati on Engineer. On the ori ginal fom, the Modi ficati on Engineer should print in the name of the person completing the action and initial and date. When all actions are completed the file should be closed.

CLOSEOUT COMPLETION

'.1 The Modification Engineer closes the file for the modification and places in permanent plant files. Site document log and attachments should be attached to the modification closeout form if available.

3.2 l}A reviews completed files.

3.3 File shall be placed in archives by document control. Modification Engineer should log that the modi fication is completed in Appendix 2.

AP-6.1 Ma rch, 1986

~

Q . 5 'R

+m-,,g 4g H

)5 8@l 4 V

.r y