IR 05000352/2018001: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:May 11, 2018 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
LIMERICK GENERATING STATION - INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000352/2018001 AND 05000353/2018001 | |||
SUBJECT: LIMERICK GENERATING STATION - INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000352/2018001 AND 05000353/2018001 | |||
==Dear Mr. Hanson:== | ==Dear Mr. Hanson:== | ||
| Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
NRC inspectors documented two findings of very low safety significance (Green) in this report. | NRC inspectors documented two findings of very low safety significance (Green) in this report. | ||
These findings involved violations of NRC | These findings involved violations of NRC requirements. The NRC is treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the Enforcement Policy. | ||
If you contest the violations or significance of these NCVs, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC Resident Inspector at LGS. In addition, if you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC, 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I, and the NRC Resident Inspector at LGS. | If you contest the violations or significance of these NCVs, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC Resident Inspector at LGS. In addition, if you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC, 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I, and the NRC Resident Inspector at LGS. | ||
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the | This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the NRCs Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding. | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ | /RA/ | ||
James A. Krafty, Acting Chief Reactor Projects Branch 4 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Numbers: 50-352 and 50-353 License Numbers: NPF-39 and NPF-85 | James A. Krafty, Acting Chief Reactor Projects Branch 4 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Numbers: 50-352 and 50-353 License Numbers: NPF-39 and NPF-85 | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
==Inspection Report== | ==Inspection Report== | ||
Docket Numbers: 50-352 and 50-353 | Docket Numbers: | ||
50-352 and 50-353 | |||
License Numbers: | |||
NPF-39 and NPF-85 | |||
Report Numbers: | |||
05000352/2018001 and 05000353/2018001 | |||
Enterprise Identifier: | |||
I-2018-001-0071 | |||
Licensee: | |||
Exelon Generation Company, LLC | |||
Facility: | |||
Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 & 2 | |||
Location: | |||
Sanatoga, PA 19464 | |||
Inspection Dates: | |||
January 1, 2018 through March 31, 2018 | |||
Inspectors: | |||
S. Rutenkroger, PhD, Senior Resident Inspector | |||
M. Fannon, Resident Inspector | |||
H. Anagnostopoulos, Senior Health Physicist | |||
J. Furia, Senior Health Physicist | |||
Approved By: | |||
J. Krafty, Acting Chief | |||
Reactor Projects Branch 4 | |||
Division of Reactor Projects | |||
=SUMMARY= | |||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring Exelons performance at | |||
Limerick Generating Station Units 1 and 2 by conducting the baseline inspections described in this report in accordance with the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process is the NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors. | |||
Refer to https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more information. NRC identified and self-revealed findings, violations, and additional items are summarized in the table below. | |||
Opened/Closed | ===List of Findings and Violations=== | ||
Failure of Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Pipe Nipple Fitting Cornerstone Significance Cross-cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating Systems Green NCV 05000353/2018001-01 Opened/Closed | |||
[P.1] - | |||
Identification 71153 A self-revealed Green non-cited violation (NCV) of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, | |||
Corrective Action, and LGS Unit 2 technical specification (TS) 3.8.1.1 was identified when Exelon failed to correct a degraded lube oil pipe nipple fitting on the D22 emergency diesel generator (EDG) when maintenance was performed to address leakage which caused inoperability of the EDG for greater than its TS allowed outage time. | |||
Emergency Diesel Generator Combustion Air Overheating Cornerstone Significance Cross-cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating Systems Green NCV 05000352/2018001-02 Opened/Closed | |||
[P.3] - | |||
Resolution 71153 A self-revealed Green NCV of LGS Unit 1 TS 6.8.1 and TS 3.8.1.1 was identified when Exelon failed to properly maintain an operating procedure to maintain a fail-safe design feature for the EDGs which led to the D12 EDG combustion air overheating and caused the EDG to be inoperable for greater than its TS allowed outage time. | |||
===Additional Tracking Items=== | |||
Type Issue number Title Report Section Status LER 05000353/2017-008-00 05000353/2017-008-01 EDG Inoperable for Greater Than 30 Days Resulting in a Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications 71153 Closed LER 05000352/2018-001-00 D12 EDG Inoperable for Greater than 30 Days Resulting in a Condition Prohibited by TS 71153 Closed | |||
=PLANT STATUS= | =PLANT STATUS= | ||
Unit 1 began the inspection period at rated thermal power. On March 25 to 26, 2018, the unit was down powered and shutdown for a planned refueling outage. The unit remained shutdown for the refueling outage for the remainder of the inspection period. | |||
Unit 2 began the inspection period at rated thermal power. On March 17, 2018, the unit was down powered to 64 percent to repair a main condenser tube leak. The unit was returned to rated thermal power the same day and remained at or near rated thermal power for the remainder of the inspection period. | Unit 2 began the inspection period at rated thermal power. On March 17, 2018, the unit was down powered to 64 percent to repair a main condenser tube leak. The unit was returned to rated thermal power the same day and remained at or near rated thermal power for the remainder of the inspection period. | ||
==INSPECTION SCOPES== | ==INSPECTION SCOPES== | ||
Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, | Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors performed plant status activities described in IMC 2515 Appendix D, Plant Status and conducted routine reviews using IP 71152, Problem Identification and Resolution. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess Exelons performance and compliance with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards. | ||
==REACTOR SAFETY== | ==REACTOR SAFETY== | ||
==71111.01 - Adverse Weather Protection== | ==71111.01 - Adverse Weather Protection== | ||
===Impending Severe Weather (2 samples)=== | |||
===Impending Severe Weather=== | |||
: (1) The inspectors evaluated readiness for impending adverse weather conditions for the onset of winter weather, including high winds, on January 5, 2018. | : (1) The inspectors evaluated readiness for impending adverse weather conditions for the onset of winter weather, including high winds, on January 5, 2018. | ||
: (2) The inspectors evaluated readiness for impending adverse weather conditions for the onset of winter weather, including high winds, on March 2, 2018. | : (2) The inspectors evaluated readiness for impending adverse weather conditions for the onset of winter weather, including high winds, on March 2, 2018. | ||
==71111.04 - Equipment Alignment== | ==71111.04 - Equipment Alignment== | ||
===Partial Walkdown (5 samples)=== | |||
===Partial Walkdown=== | |||
The inspectors evaluated system configurations during partial walkdowns of the following systems/trains: | The inspectors evaluated system configurations during partial walkdowns of the following systems/trains: | ||
: (1) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection on January 16 and 17, 2018 | : (1) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection on January 16 and 17, 2018 | ||
: (2) Unit 1 | : (2) Unit 1 D11 and D13 emergency diesel generators (EDGs) on February 5, 2018 | ||
: (3) Unit 2 | : (3) Unit 2 2A batteries and chargers during 2BD101 battery planned maintenance on February 5 through 9, 2018 | ||
: (4) Unit 1 | : (4) Unit 1 B residual heat removal subsystem in shutdown cooling during the A emergency core cooling subsystem maintenance window on March 27, 2018 | ||
: (5) Unit 1 | : (5) Unit 1 D12 EDG during the division 1 and 3 direct current bus maintenance window on March 28, 2018 | ||
==71111.05 - Fire Protection== | ==71111.05 - Fire Protection== | ||
===Quarterly Inspection (5 samples)=== | |||
===Quarterly Inspection=== | The inspectors evaluated fire protection program implementation in the following selected areas: | ||
: (1) Fire area 2, Unit common 13.2kV switchgear room, elevation 217, on January 8, 2018 | |||
: (2) Fire area 8, Unit 1 class 1E battery room, elevation 239, on January 23, 2018 | |||
The inspectors evaluated fire protection program implementation in the following selected | : (3) Fire area 10, Unit 2 class 1E battery rooms, elevation 239, on February 5, 2018 | ||
: (4) Fire area 28, Unit common standby gas treatment area rooms, elevation 332, on February 27, 201 | |||
areas: | : (5) Fire area 43, Unit 1 safeguard isolation valve area room 309, elevation 217, on March 28, 2018 | ||
: (1) Fire area 2, Unit common 13.2kV switchgear room, elevation 217 | |||
: (2) Fire area 8, Unit 1 class 1E battery room, elevation 239 | |||
: (3) Fire area 10, Unit 2 class 1E battery rooms, elevation 239 | |||
: (4) Fire area 28, Unit common standby gas treatment area rooms, elevation 332 | |||
: (5) Fire area 43, Unit 1 safeguard isolation valve area room 309, elevation 217 | |||
==71111.11 - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance== | ==71111.11 - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance== | ||
===Operator Requalification (1 sample)=== | |||
===Operator Requalification=== | |||
The inspectors observed and evaluated licensed operator simulator training scenarios on February 20, 2018. | The inspectors observed and evaluated licensed operator simulator training scenarios on February 20, 2018. | ||
Operator Performance (1 sample)=== | ===Operator Performance (1 sample)=== | ||
The inspectors observed the downpower and normal plant shutdown of Unit 1 for a planned refueling outage on March 25 and 26, 2018 | |||
==71111.12 - Maintenance Effectiveness== | ==71111.12 - Maintenance Effectiveness== | ||
===Routine Maintenance Effectiveness (2 samples)=== | |||
===Routine Maintenance Effectiveness=== | |||
The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of routine maintenance activities associated with the following equipment and/or safety significant functions: | The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of routine maintenance activities associated with the following equipment and/or safety significant functions: | ||
: (1) Unit 1 reactor manual control system | : (1) Unit 1 reactor manual control system | ||
| Line 148: | Line 159: | ||
==71111.13 - Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control (6 samples)== | ==71111.13 - Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control (6 samples)== | ||
The inspectors evaluated the risk assessments for the following planned and emergent work activities: | |||
: (1) Unit 2 reactor core isolation cooling relay replacements on January 16 and 17, 2018 | : (1) Unit 2 reactor core isolation cooling relay replacements on January 16 and 17, 2018 | ||
: (2) Unit common | : (2) Unit common B control room emergency fresh air system testing on February 7, 2018 | ||
: (3) Unit 2 | : (3) Unit 2 A residual heat removal maintenance on February 26 and 27, 2018 | ||
: (4) Unit common | : (4) Unit common A standby gas treatment system maintenance on February 27, 2018 | ||
: (5) Unit common | : (5) Unit common A emergency service water, A standby gas treatment system, and Unit 2 A reactor enclosure recirculation system maintenance on March 1, 2018 | ||
: (6) Unit 1 | : (6) Unit 1 A emergency core cooling system maintenance during reduced core inventory in the refueling outage on March 27 and 28, 2018 | ||
==71111.15 - Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments (6 samples)== | |||
The inspectors evaluated the following operability determinations and functionality assessments: | The inspectors evaluated the following operability determinations and functionality assessments: | ||
: (1) Unit 2, | : (1) Unit 2, D21 EDG room low temperature alarm on December 31, 2017 | ||
: (2) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection condensate pump discharge check valve failure on January 25, 2018 | : (2) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection condensate pump discharge check valve failure on January 25, 2018 | ||
: (3) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection vacuum breaker check valve oversized disc on January 31, 2018 | : (3) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection vacuum breaker check valve oversized disc on January 31, 2018 | ||
: (4) Unit common | : (4) Unit common A emergency service water pump motor step voltage test leakage current on January 31, 2018 | ||
: (5) Unit 2 | : (5) Unit 2 D21 EDG multiple battery ground alarms while raising speed during the slow start surveillance test on February 2, 2018 | ||
: (6) Unit common, | : (6) Unit common, B control room air supply controller not properly maintaining room temperature on February 4, 2018 | ||
==71111.18 - Plant Modifications (2 samples)== | ==71111.18 - Plant Modifications (2 samples)== | ||
The inspectors evaluated the following temporary or permanent modifications: | |||
: (1) Engineering change package 622647 - Inflatable Seal - Secondary Containment | : (1) Engineering change package 622647 - Inflatable Seal - Secondary Containment | ||
: (2) Engineering change request 433952, | : (2) Engineering change request 433952, D23 Repair of the Blower Inspection Cover Bolt Holes Using Stainless Steel Heli-Coil Thread Inserts | ||
==71111.19 - Post Maintenance Testing (6 samples)== | |||
The inspectors evaluated post maintenance testing for the following maintenance/repair activities: | The inspectors evaluated post maintenance testing for the following maintenance/repair activities: | ||
: (1) Unit 2 | : (1) Unit 2 D24 EDG fuse replacement following an intermittent issue in the automatic start logic circuit on December 6, 2017 | ||
: (2) Unit 2 reactor core isolation cooling relay replacements on January 16 and 17, 2018 | : (2) Unit 2 reactor core isolation cooling relay replacements on January 16 and 17, 2018 | ||
: (3) Unit 1 | : (3) Unit 1 D12 EDG air cooler temperature indicator controller pressure control valve (PCV)replacement on February 5, 2018 | ||
: (4) Unit 2 | : (4) Unit 2 B2 battery cell replacements on February 5 and 6, 2018 | ||
: (5) Unit 2 | : (5) Unit 2 B2 battery charger current adjustment on February 15, 2018 | ||
: (6) Unit 2 | : (6) Unit 2 D24 EDG heating, ventilation, and cooling fan controller replacement on February 22, 2018 | ||
==71111.20 - Refueling and Other Outage Activities== | ==71111.20 - Refueling and Other Outage Activities== | ||
The inspectors evaluated the Unit 1 refueling outage 1R17 from March 26, 2018, through the end of the inspection period. The following portions of the inspection procedure were not performed during this period. | |||
: (1) Fatigue Management | : (1) Fatigue Management | ||
: (2) Startup | : (2) Startup | ||
==71111.22 - Surveillance Testing== | ==71111.22 - Surveillance Testing== | ||
The inspectors evaluated the following surveillance tests: | The inspectors evaluated the following surveillance tests: | ||
Routine=== | ===Routine=== | ||
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111. | {{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.22|count=3}} | ||
: (1) ST-6-092-113-2, | : (1) ST-6-092-113-2, D23 EDG 24 hour endurance run on January 18 and 19, 2018 | ||
: (2) RT-6-051-320-1, Unit 1 | : (2) RT-6-051-320-1, Unit 1 B residual heat removal remote operation test on February 7, 2018 | ||
: (3) ST-2-074-642-1, Unit 1 source range and intermediate range neutron monitors pre-shutdown testing on March 18 | : (3) ST-2-074-642-1, Unit 1 source range and intermediate range neutron monitors pre-shutdown testing on March 18, 2018 | ||
===(2) ST-6-052- | ===In-service (2 samples)=== | ||
: (1) ST-6-052-231-1, Unit 1 A core spray pump, valve, and flow test on January 4, 2018 | |||
: (2) ST- | : (2) ST-6-052-232-1, Unit 1 B core spray pump, valve, and flow test on March 10, 2018 | ||
==== | ===Containment Isolation Valve (2 samples)=== | ||
: (1) ST-4-LLR-031-1, Unit 1 main steam line A inboard and outboard isolation valves leakage rate testing on March 29, 2018 | |||
: (2) ST-4-LLR-041-1, Unit 1 main steam line B inboard and outboard isolation valves leakage rate testing on March 29, | |||
==RADIATION SAFETY== | |||
==71124.02 - Occupational As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) Planning and Controls== | ==71124.02 - Occupational As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) Planning and Controls== | ||
===Radiological Work Planning (1 sample)=== | |||
===Radiological Work Planning=== | The inspectors evaluated Exelons radiological work planning by reviewing the following activities: | ||
The inspectors evaluated | |||
: (1) ALARA Plan 2017-101 | : (1) ALARA Plan 2017-101 | ||
: (2) ALARA Plan 2017-050 | : (2) ALARA Plan 2017-050 | ||
: (3) ALARA Plan 2017-052 | : (3) ALARA Plan 2017-052 | ||
Verification of Dose Estimates and Exposure Tracking Systems (1 sample)=== | ===Verification of Dose Estimates and Exposure Tracking Systems (1 sample)=== | ||
The inspectors evaluated dose estimates and exposure tracking. | The inspectors evaluated dose estimates and exposure tracking. | ||
==71124.08 - Radioactive Solid Waste Processing and Radioactive Material Handling, Storage,== | |||
and Transportation | |||
===Radioactive Material Storage=== | ===Radioactive Material Storage=== | ||
| Line 230: | Line 231: | ||
The inspectors observed radioactive waste container storage areas and verified the postings and controls and that Exelon had established a process for monitoring the impact of long-term storage of the waste. | The inspectors observed radioactive waste container storage areas and verified the postings and controls and that Exelon had established a process for monitoring the impact of long-term storage of the waste. | ||
Radioactive Waste System Walkdown (1 sample)=== | ===Radioactive Waste System Walkdown (1 sample)=== | ||
The inspectors walked down the following: | The inspectors walked down the following: | ||
Accessible portions of liquid and solid radioactive waste processing systems to verify current system alignment and material condition | |||
Abandoned in place radioactive waste processing equipment to review the controls in place to ensure protection of personnel | |||
Changes made to the radioactive waste processing systems since the last inspection | |||
Processes for mixing and transferring radioactive waste resin and/or sludge discharges into shipping/disposal containers | |||
Current methods and procedures for dewatering waste | |||
===Waste Characterization and Classification (1 sample)=== | |||
The inspectors identified radioactive waste streams and reviewed radiochemical sample analysis results to support radioactive waste characterization. The inspectors reviewed the use of scaling factors and calculations to account for difficult-to-measure radionuclides. | The inspectors identified radioactive waste streams and reviewed radiochemical sample analysis results to support radioactive waste characterization. The inspectors reviewed the use of scaling factors and calculations to account for difficult-to-measure radionuclides. | ||
===Shipment Preparation (1 sample)=== | ===Shipment Preparation (1 sample)=== | ||
The inspectors reviewed the records of shipment packaging, surveying, labeling, marking, placarding, vehicle checks, emergency instructions, disposal manifest, shipping papers provided to the driver, and | The inspectors reviewed the records of shipment packaging, surveying, labeling, marking, placarding, vehicle checks, emergency instructions, disposal manifest, shipping papers provided to the driver, and Exelons verification of shipment readiness. | ||
===Shipping Records (1 sample)=== | ===Shipping Records (1 sample)=== | ||
| Line 243: | Line 254: | ||
==OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE== | ==OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE== | ||
===71151 - Performance Indicator Verification=== | |||
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71151|count=6}} | |||
The inspectors verified Exelons performance indicator submittals listed below for the period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. | |||
The inspectors verified | |||
: (1) Unit 1 and Unit 2 Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours | : (1) Unit 1 and Unit 2 Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours | ||
: (2) Unit 1 and Unit 2 High Pressure Injection Systems | : (2) Unit 1 and Unit 2 High Pressure Injection Systems | ||
: (3) Unit 1 and Unit 2 Heat Removal Systems | : (3) Unit 1 and Unit 2 Heat Removal Systems | ||
===71153 - Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion | ===71153 - Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion Licensee Event Reports (LER)=== | ||
Licensee Event Reports (LER) === | |||
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71153|count=2}} | {{IP sample|IP=IP 71153|count=2}} | ||
The inspectors evaluated the following licensee event reports which can be accessed at https://lersearch.inl.gov/LERSearchCriteria.aspx | The inspectors evaluated the following licensee event reports which can be accessed at https://lersearch.inl.gov/LERSearchCriteria.aspx: | ||
: | |||
: (1) LER 05000353/2017-008-00 and 05000353/2017-008-01, EDG Inoperable for Greater Than 30 Days Resulting in a Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications, on December 11, 2017, and February 22, 2018. The review for this event is documented in the inspection results section. | : (1) LER 05000353/2017-008-00 and 05000353/2017-008-01, EDG Inoperable for Greater Than 30 Days Resulting in a Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications, on December 11, 2017, and February 22, 2018. The review for this event is documented in the inspection results section. | ||
: (2) LER 05000352/2018-001-00, D12 EDG Inoperable for Greater than 30 Days Resulting in a Condition Prohibited by TS, on February 5, 2018. The review for this event is documented in the inspection results section. | : (2) LER 05000352/2018-001-00, D12 EDG Inoperable for Greater than 30 Days Resulting in a Condition Prohibited by TS, on February 5, 2018. The review for this event is documented in the inspection results section. | ||
==INSPECTION RESULTS== | ==INSPECTION RESULTS== | ||
Failure of Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Pipe Nipple Fitting Cornerstone Significance Cross-cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating Systems Green NCV 05000353/2018001-01 | Failure of Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Pipe Nipple Fitting Cornerstone Significance Cross-cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating Systems Green NCV 05000353/2018001-01 Opened/Closed | ||
[P.1] - | |||
Opened/Closed [P.1] - Identification 71153 A self-revealed Green non-cited violation (NCV) of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, | Identification 71153 A self-revealed Green non-cited violation (NCV) of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, and LGS Unit 2 technical specification (TS) 3.8.1.1 was identified when Exelon failed to correct a degraded lube oil pipe nipple fitting on the D22 EDG when maintenance was performed to address leakage which caused inoperability of the EDG for greater than its TS allowed outage time. | ||
=====Description:===== | =====Description:===== | ||
The EDG systems are safety related standby emergency power systems for LGS Units 1 and 2 consisting of four diesel generator sets per unit. Each EDG has a lube oil system that cools the diesel engine, lubricates the engine wear surfaces (moving parts), and captures friction wear products. On October 11, 2017, during testing of the | The EDG systems are safety related standby emergency power systems for LGS Units 1 and 2 consisting of four diesel generator sets per unit. Each EDG has a lube oil system that cools the diesel engine, lubricates the engine wear surfaces (moving parts), and captures friction wear products. On October 11, 2017, during testing of the D22 EDG, Exelon personnel identified a lube oil leak from a 0.5 inch tapered thread pipe nipple fitting between the lube oil filter and the lube oil filter vent valve. The personnel estimated the leak to be approximately 0.03125 gallons per minute (gpm) (about one-half cup per minute), and Exelon declared the EDG inoperable. | ||
Exelon performed an equipment corrective action program evaluation and identified that the same fitting was found to be leaking and/or weeping on August 31, 2010, and October 3, 2012. After identifying leakage on August 31, 2010, Exelon removed, cleaned, visually inspected, and reinstalled the fitting with thread sealant on November 29, 2011. After the second identification of leakage on October 3, 2012, Exelon performed a similar repair for a second time on August 29, 2013. Exelon planned a similar repair when the fitting leaked for a third time on September 7, 2017. The repair was initially planned for October 6, 2017, but was subsequently rescheduled for November 3, 2017. Exelon identified three through-wall cracks and irregular threads in the fitting and concluded the apparent cause of the failure on October 11, 2017, was age related cyclic fatigue induced by diesel engine vibration. Exelon also determined that the repairs made in 2011 and 2013 contributed to the stresses and crack development and propagation rate based on galling of the threads, wrench marks on the exterior of the fitting, and deeper thread engagement. | Exelon performed an equipment corrective action program evaluation and identified that the same fitting was found to be leaking and/or weeping on August 31, 2010, and October 3, 2012. After identifying leakage on August 31, 2010, Exelon removed, cleaned, visually inspected, and reinstalled the fitting with thread sealant on November 29, 2011. After the second identification of leakage on October 3, 2012, Exelon performed a similar repair for a second time on August 29, 2013. Exelon planned a similar repair when the fitting leaked for a third time on September 7, 2017. The repair was initially planned for October 6, 2017, but was subsequently rescheduled for November 3, 2017. Exelon identified three through-wall cracks and irregular threads in the fitting and concluded the apparent cause of the failure on October 11, 2017, was age related cyclic fatigue induced by diesel engine vibration. Exelon also determined that the repairs made in 2011 and 2013 contributed to the stresses and crack development and propagation rate based on galling of the threads, wrench marks on the exterior of the fitting, and deeper thread engagement. | ||
The inspectors determined that a rework investigation was required by Exelon procedure MA-AA-716-017, | The inspectors determined that a rework investigation was required by Exelon procedure MA-AA-716-017, Station Rework Reduction Program, when leakage was identified the second time. Exelon was unable to find evidence that a rework investigation was performed or provide a basis for not performing one. The inspectors concluded a rework investigation would have reasonably provided additional focus and oversight on the subsequent maintenance performed on August 29, 2013. The inspectors determined that additional focus would have provided an opportunity to identify the galled threads on the pipe nipple, the high installation torque required to insert the nipple, and the deeper thread engagement of the nipple following the repair (the nipple was essentially fully inserted into the housing). The fittings condition indicated additional tightening of at least two additional threads beyond original installation which is outside the tolerances of ASME B1.20.1, Pipe Threads, General Purpose (Inch). Based on these conditions, the inspectors determined that Exelon had a reasonable opportunity to foresee and correct the degraded fitting as required by Exelon procedure PI-AA-125, Corrective Action Program (CAP) Procedure, when the second repair was performed. | ||
would have reasonably provided additional focus and oversight on the subsequent maintenance performed on August 29, 2013. The inspectors determined that additional focus would have provided an opportunity to identify the galled threads on the pipe nipple, the high installation torque required to insert the nipple, and the deeper thread engagement of the nipple following the repair (the nipple was essentially fully inserted into the housing). The | |||
was performed. | |||
The inspectors also noted that when maintenance personnel fabricated a replacement fitting after the October 11, 2017, failure, the new fitting leaked during post-maintenance testing. | The inspectors also noted that when maintenance personnel fabricated a replacement fitting after the October 11, 2017, failure, the new fitting leaked during post-maintenance testing. | ||
| Line 281: | Line 285: | ||
Maintenance personnel responded by tightening the fitting further, and the fitting leaked again during post-maintenance testing. Exelon then removed the fitting, determined the threads of the new fitting were not satisfactory, that personnel had not verified the threads were properly cut, and fabricated a second new fitting. Although the performance deficiency occurred on August 29, 2013, the inspectors considered the above and determined the applicable cross-cutting aspect of not recognizing deviations from ASME standards, training, and skill of the craft when taking action to address leakage was indicative of current performance. | Maintenance personnel responded by tightening the fitting further, and the fitting leaked again during post-maintenance testing. Exelon then removed the fitting, determined the threads of the new fitting were not satisfactory, that personnel had not verified the threads were properly cut, and fabricated a second new fitting. Although the performance deficiency occurred on August 29, 2013, the inspectors considered the above and determined the applicable cross-cutting aspect of not recognizing deviations from ASME standards, training, and skill of the craft when taking action to address leakage was indicative of current performance. | ||
Corrective Action(s): | Corrective Action(s): Exelon replaced the fitting and restored operability of the EDG on October 15, 2017, revised equipment data to require replacement of a pipe nipple fitting instead of reusing if a future leak is identified, and initiated actions to replace similar fittings for extent of condition. | ||
Corrective Action Reference(s): | Corrective Action Reference(s): Issue Report (IR) 4070641 | ||
=====Performance Assessment:===== | =====Performance Assessment:===== | ||
Performance Deficiency: | Performance Deficiency: The inspectors determined that the failure to correct a degraded lube oil pipe nipple fitting on the D22 EDG when maintenance was performed to address leakage was reasonably within Exelons ability to foresee and correct and should have been prevented. | ||
Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor because it adversely affected the equipment performance attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone to ensure the availability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences (i.e. core damage). Specifically, the issue caused the D22 EDG to be inoperable from September 7 to October 15, 2017. | |||
Screening: | |||
Significance: | Significance: The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using IMC 0609, Appendix A, Exhibit 2, and determined that this finding was of very low safety significance (Green). Specifically, the inspectors, in consultation with a Region I senior reactor analyst (SRA), determined that the condition did not represent an actual loss of the D22 EDG probabilistic risk assessment safety function, i.e. the capability to provide power for up to 24 hours. The lube oil storage tank contained over 216 gallons during the period. | ||
The lube oil consumption rate was less than 0.05 gpm. The leak rate was consistent at about 0.03125 gpm. Therefore, at a minimum the lube oil storage tank contained sufficient oil to make up to the | The lube oil consumption rate was less than 0.05 gpm. The leak rate was consistent at about 0.03125 gpm. Therefore, at a minimum the lube oil storage tank contained sufficient oil to make up to the D22 EDG oil reservoir for over 40 hours of EDG operation. | ||
Cross-Cutting Aspect: | Cross-Cutting Aspect: The inspectors determined that this finding has a cross-cutting aspect in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution, Identification, because Exelon personnel did not recognize deviations from standards, training, and skill of the craft when addressing leakage. [P.1] | ||
=====Enforcement:===== | =====Enforcement:===== | ||
Violation: | Violation: 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, requires, in part, that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as deficiencies, defective material, and non-conformances are promptly identified and corrected. | ||
LGS Unit 2 TS 3.8.1.1 requires that an inoperable diesel generator be restored to an operable status within 30 days or the unit be in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours and in cold shutdown within the following 24 hours. Contrary to the above, from August 29, 2013 to October 15, 2017, a condition adverse to quality was not promptly corrected. Specifically, repairs made to the D22 lube oil filter housing to vent valve pipe nipple fitting failed to correct the cracked fitting which caused the leakage. This caused the D22 EDG to be inoperable from September 7, 2017, to October 15, 2017. The action to restore the diesel within 30 days was not met on October 7, 2017, and Unit 2 was not in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours and in cold shutdown within the following 24 hours. | |||
Disposition: This violation is being treated as an NCV, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy. | |||
Opened/Closed [P.3] - Resolution 71153 A self-revealed Green NCV of LGS Unit 1 TS 6.8.1 and TS 3.8.1.1 was identified when Exelon failed to properly maintain an operating procedure to maintain a fail-safe design feature for the EDGs which led to the | Emergency Diesel Generator Combustion Air Overheating Cornerstone Significance Cross-cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating System Green NCV 05000352/2018001-02 Opened/Closed | ||
[P.3] - | |||
Resolution 71153 A self-revealed Green NCV of LGS Unit 1 TS 6.8.1 and TS 3.8.1.1 was identified when Exelon failed to properly maintain an operating procedure to maintain a fail-safe design feature for the EDGs which led to the D12 EDG combustion air overheating and caused the EDG to be inoperable for greater than its TS allowed outage time. | |||
=====Description:===== | =====Description:===== | ||
The EDG systems are safety related standby emergency power systems for LGS Units 1 and 2. Each EDG has an air cooler coolant heat exchanger that cools the water that cools the combustion air entering the engine. A three-way thermostatic control valve maintains combustion air temperature between 115 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) and 145 °F by controlling how much emergency service water flows through this heat exchanger. | The EDG systems are safety related standby emergency power systems for LGS Units 1 and 2. Each EDG has an air cooler coolant heat exchanger that cools the water that cools the combustion air entering the engine. A three-way thermostatic control valve maintains combustion air temperature between 115 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) and 145 °F by controlling how much emergency service water flows through this heat exchanger. | ||
On December 7, 2017, during surveillance testing of the | On December 7, 2017, during surveillance testing of the D12 EDG, Exelon personnel recognized that the combustion air temperature was abnormally high at 220 °F, with an expected band of 115 °F to 145 °F. The D12 EDG had run unloaded for about two hours, then fully loaded for about one hour when the condition was recognized. Exelon shutdown and declared the D12 EDG inoperable and entered TS Limiting Condition for Operation 3.8.1.1. As part of troubleshooting, the temperature indicating controller (TIC) was removed, bench tested satisfactorily, re-installed, and recalibrated to a setpoint temperature of 130°F. | ||
Exelon | Exelon found the cooling water controllers setpoint dial set at 200°F instead of at the required setpoint of 130°F. On December 12, 2017, Exelon restored and declared the D12 EDG operable. | ||
Exelon performed a past operability review and root cause evaluation and determined that the past functionality of the D12 EDG was adversely impacted such that the EDG was inoperable since performance of the 24-hour endurance run that began on November 6, 2017. Specifically, Exelon determined that on November 6, 2017, while performing a routine running check of engine operation, an equipment operator identified that the air cooler temperature controller setpoint was not at 130°F with process temperatures off-scale low. | |||
The low temperatures were previously identified with an existing IR, initiated on June 12, 2017. The operator adjusted the dial in order to adjust the temperature controller setpoint, in accordance with operating procedure S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel Generators. However, Exelon determined that an intermittent malfunction of the PCV in the supply air to the temperature controller caused the TIC setpoint to be lower and fail to respond. During the next engine run on December 7, 2017, the PCV delivered proper air pressure after three hours of runtime which resulted in the TIC setpoint being at 200 °F based on the as-left dial position that was established on November 6, 2017. | |||
Exelon determined the root cause of the issue was the intermittent condition of the PCV that caused intermittent combustion air low temperature operation. Exelon further determined the contributing cause of the issue was the operating procedure directing action which introduced a failure mechanism for the cooling system that was otherwise designed to fail safe (i.e. loss of supply air results in maximum cooling with no loss of diesel function). Finally, Exelon determined the most significant organizational contributor to the issue was the organizations failure to take effective corrective action to address the known low temperature condition which was caused by the degraded pressure control valve. | |||
Corrective Action Reference(s): | Corrective Action(s): Exelon recalibrated and reinstalled the TIC, revised the operating procedure to ensure EDG functionality is maintained, and replaced the degraded PCV. | ||
Corrective Action Reference(s): IR 4081882 | |||
=====Performance Assessment:===== | =====Performance Assessment:===== | ||
Performance Deficiency: | Performance Deficiency: The inspectors determined that the failure to properly maintain an operating procedure for the EDGs to maintain a fail-safe design feature was reasonably within Exelons ability to foresee and correct and should have been prevented. Specifically, there was a reasonable ability to ensure the operating procedure was appropriate to the circumstances given the previously identified intermittent combustion air low temperature operation and the failure of the TIC to respond to the dial adjustment that was directed by the operating procedure. | ||
Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor because it adversely affected the equipment performance attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone to ensure the availability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences (i.e. core damage). Specifically, the inadequate procedure resulted in the D12 EDG being inoperable from November 6 to December 12, 2017. | |||
Significance: The inspectors screened the significance of the finding using IMC 0609, Appendix A, Exhibit 2, and determined that this finding required a detailed risk evaluation (DRE) since the inoperability exceeded the TS allowed outage time of 30 days. | |||
Significance: | |||
A Region I SRA completed the DRE and estimated the increase in core damage frequency (CDF) associated with this performance deficiency to be 8.8E-8/yr, or of very low safety significance (Green). To perform the DRE, the SRA used the Systems Analysis Programs for Hands-On Evaluation (SAPHIRE), Revision 8.1.6, Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR) | A Region I SRA completed the DRE and estimated the increase in core damage frequency (CDF) associated with this performance deficiency to be 8.8E-8/yr, or of very low safety significance (Green). To perform the DRE, the SRA used the Systems Analysis Programs for Hands-On Evaluation (SAPHIRE), Revision 8.1.6, Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR) | ||
Model, version 8.50 for LGS Unit 1. This model was determined to require an update to appropriately modify logic and power dependencies associated with the low pressure injection motor operated valve logic. These modifications were assessed and performed by an Idaho National Labs (INL) SPAR model contractor. A limited use updated SPAR model version was posted on the INL website and used by the SRA to run the conditional assessment assuming a failure to run for the | Model, version 8.50 for LGS Unit 1. This model was determined to require an update to appropriately modify logic and power dependencies associated with the low pressure injection motor operated valve logic. These modifications were assessed and performed by an Idaho National Labs (INL) SPAR model contractor. A limited use updated SPAR model version was posted on the INL website and used by the SRA to run the conditional assessment assuming a failure to run for the D12 EDG. The failure was assumed given the unexpected high intercooler air outlet temperatures. As noted in Exelons review of the issue, the concern with these higher temperatures was related to blower degradation and engine degradation which was determined to challenge the operability of the EDG. | ||
The SRA reviewed procedures E-1, | The SRA reviewed procedures E-1, Loss of All AC Power, and E-10/20, Loss of Offsite Power, and determined that a best estimate value for the ability to cross-tie power from Unit 2 safety busses to Unit 1 safety busses was 6E-2. This failure probability to take cross-tie actions was calculated through the use of a SPAR-H calculation conservatively assuming barely adequate time exists, high stress, and low experience for the task. Basic event EPS-XHE-XM-DGXT, was therefore changed from TRUE to 6E-2. An exposure time of 36 days was used based on the inoperable time determined for the D12 EDG. Additionally, no recovery credit was given for the high temperature condition. This was considered a conservative assumption by the SRA given that procedure S92.9.N existed and if used during a postulated event may have resulted in observation of the nonconforming condition and subsequent action to dial back the temperature setpoint. The SRA determined this action would have returned temperatures to the normal band. | ||
The dominant core damage sequence involved a weather related loss of offsite power, with failure of the | The dominant core damage sequence involved a weather related loss of offsite power, with failure of the D12 EDG, common cause failure of the remaining Unit 1 EDGs, failure to cross-tie a Unit 2 EDG to a Unit 1 safety bus, failure to depressurize given the eventual loss of direct current (DC) power, and failure to recover either offsite power or an EDG within 5 hours. In accordance with IMC 0609 guidance a review of the external event risk or large early release frequency was not performed given the increase in internal event CDF was below the 1E-7/yr threshold and would not be expected to change the risk estimation. | ||
Cross-Cutting Aspect: | Cross-Cutting Aspect: The inspectors determined that this finding has a cross-cutting aspect in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution, Resolution, because Exelon did not take effective corrective action when the intermittent low temperature condition caused by the degraded PCV was identified. Specifically, Exelon did not take appropriate interim corrective action to address the operating procedures TIC adjustments in order to mitigate the issue while more fundamental causes were being addressed. [P.3] | ||
=====Enforcement:===== | =====Enforcement:===== | ||
Violation: | Violation: LGS Unit 1 TS 6.8.1, requires, in part, written procedures to be established, implemented, and maintained covering applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978. Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, Appendix A, Section 1, requires procedures with instructions prepared as appropriate for the operation of onsite emergency power sources (e.g. diesel generators). In addition, LGS Unit 1 TS 3.8.1.1 requires that an inoperable diesel generator be restored to an operable status within 30 days or the unit be in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours and in cold shutdown within the following 24 hours. Contrary to the above, Exelon did not properly maintain EDG operating procedure S92.9.N as appropriate for the operation of the EDGs. | ||
This caused the | This caused the D12 EDG to be inoperable from November 6, 2017, to December 12, 2017. | ||
Disposition: | The action to restore the diesel within 30 days was not met on December 6, 2017, and Unit 1 was not in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours and in cold shutdown within the following 24 hours. | ||
This violation is being treated as an NCV, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy. | |||
Disposition: This violation is being treated as an NCV, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy. | |||
==EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS== | ==EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS== | ||
| Line 356: | Line 358: | ||
On April 12, 2018, the inspectors presented the quarterly resident inspector inspection results to Rick Libra, Site Vice-President, and other members of the Exelon staff. | On April 12, 2018, the inspectors presented the quarterly resident inspector inspection results to Rick Libra, Site Vice-President, and other members of the Exelon staff. | ||
THIRD PARTY REVIEWS Inspectors reviewed Institute on Nuclear Power Reactor reports that were issued during the inspection period. | THIRD PARTY REVIEWS | ||
Inspectors reviewed Institute on Nuclear Power Reactor reports that were issued during the inspection period. | |||
=DOCUMENTS REVIEWED= | =DOCUMENTS REVIEWED= | ||
71111.01 | 71111.01 | ||
Procedures GP-7, Cold Weather Preparation and Operation, Revision 53 | Procedures | ||
SE-14, Snow, Revision 21 SE-9, Preparation for Severe Weather, Revision 45 | GP-7, Cold Weather Preparation and Operation, Revision 53 | ||
SE-14, Snow, Revision 21 | |||
SE-9, Preparation for Severe Weather, Revision 45 | |||
Condition Reports | Condition Reports | ||
4088765 | 4088765 | ||
71111.04Q | 71111.04Q | ||
Procedures 1S92.1.N (COL-2), Equipment Alignment for 1B Diesel Generator Operation, Revision 32 | Procedures | ||
2S55.1.A (COL), Equipment Alignment for Automatic Operation of HPCI System, Revision 19 GP-6.2, Shutdown Operations - Shutdown Cooling Tech Spec Actions, Revision 54 S51.6.A, Swapping RHR Pumps in RHR SDC Mode, Revision 18 | 1S92.1.N (COL-2), Equipment Alignment for 1B Diesel Generator Operation, Revision 32 | ||
S51.8.B, Shutdown Cooling/Reactor Coolant Recirculation Operation Start-Up and Shutdown, Revision 81 S55.1.A, Normal HPCI Line-Up for Automatic Operation, Revision 37 | 2S55.1.A (COL), Equipment Alignment for Automatic Operation of HPCI System, Revision 19 | ||
ST-6-095-905-2, Unit 2 Safeguard Battery Weekly Inspection, Revision 23 ST-6-095-911-2, Div I 125/250 Vdc 2A1D101/2A2D101 Safeguard Battery Quarterly Inspection, Revision 36 ST-6-095-915-2, Div I 125/250 Vdc 2A1D101/2A2D101 Safeguard Battery Monthly Inspection, Revision 15 | GP-6.2, Shutdown Operations - Shutdown Cooling Tech Spec Actions, Revision 54 | ||
S51.6.A, Swapping RHR Pumps in RHR SDC Mode, Revision 18 | |||
S51.8.B, Shutdown Cooling/Reactor Coolant Recirculation Operation Start-Up and Shutdown, | |||
Revision 81 | |||
S55.1.A, Normal HPCI Line-Up for Automatic Operation, Revision 37 | |||
ST-6-095-905-2, Unit 2 Safeguard Battery Weekly Inspection, Revision 23 | |||
ST-6-095-911-2, Div I 125/250 Vdc 2A1D101/2A2D101 Safeguard Battery Quarterly Inspection, | |||
Revision 36 | |||
ST-6-095-915-2, Div I 125/250 Vdc 2A1D101/2A2D101 Safeguard Battery Monthly Inspection, | |||
Revision 15 | |||
71111.05Q | 71111.05Q | ||
Procedures F-A-336, Pre-Fire Plan Common, 13.2kV Switchgear Room 336, Revision 15 | Procedures | ||
F-A-336, Pre-Fire Plan Common, 13.2kV Switchgear Room 336, Revision 15 | |||
F-A-425, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Unit 1, Class 1E Battery 5, Revision 13 | F-A-425, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Unit 1, Class 1E Battery 5, Revision 13 | ||
F-A-426, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Unit 2, Class 1E Battery 426 and 454, Revision 9 F-A-624, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Standby Gas Treatment Area Rooms 624 and 625, Revision 7 F-R-309, Unit 1, Safeguard Isolation Valve Area Room 309 (El 217), Revision 11 | F-A-426, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Unit 2, Class 1E Battery 426 and 454, Revision 9 | ||
F-A-624, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Standby Gas Treatment Area Rooms 624 and 625, Revision 7 | |||
F-R-309, Unit 1, Safeguard Isolation Valve Area Room 309 (El 217), Revision 11 | |||
Condition Reports | Condition Reports | ||
20254 | 20254 | ||
20452 | |||
71111.11Q | 71111.11Q | ||
Procedures GP-3, Normal Plant Shutdown, Revision 164 | Procedures | ||
GP-3, Normal Plant Shutdown, Revision 164 | |||
S91.6.B, Transferring House Loads to S/U Buses, Revision 19 | S91.6.B, Transferring House Loads to S/U Buses, Revision 19 | ||
71111.12Q | 71111.12Q | ||
Condition Reports | Condition Reports | ||
2632557 2655420 2663432 3986074 3988302 3991456 4003680 4011371 4076445 4106926 | 2632557 | ||
Miscellaneous Engage System Health Reports | 2655420 | ||
2663432 | |||
3986074 | |||
3988302 | |||
3991456 | |||
4003680 | |||
4011371 | |||
4076445 | |||
4106926 | |||
Miscellaneous | |||
Engage System Health Reports | |||
71111.13 | 71111.13 | ||
Procedures ER-AA-600-1042, On-Line Risk Management, Revision 11 OP-LG-108-117-1000, Limerick Protected Equipment Program, Revision 6 WC-AA-101-1006, On-Line Risk Management and Assessment, Revision 2 | Procedures | ||
ER-AA-600-1042, On-Line Risk Management, Revision 11 | |||
OP-LG-108-117-1000, Limerick Protected Equipment Program, Revision 6 | |||
WC-AA-101-1006, On-Line Risk Management and Assessment, Revision 2 | |||
Condition Reports | Condition Reports | ||
4102016 4102082 | 4102016 | ||
Miscellaneous E2 Work Schedule for Week of 2/25/18 | 4102082 | ||
Miscellaneous | |||
E2 Work Schedule for Week of 2/25/18 | |||
Protected Equipment Scheme on 2/27/18 | Protected Equipment Scheme on 2/27/18 | ||
Protected Equipment Scheme on 3/1/18 Protected Equipment Scheme on 3/27/18 and 3/28/18 | Protected Equipment Scheme on 3/1/18 | ||
Protected Equipment Scheme on 3/27/18 and 3/28/18 | |||
71111.15 | 71111.15 | ||
Procedures OP-AA-102-103, Operator Work-Around Program, Revision 4 OP-AA-102-106, Operator Response Time Program, Revision 4 ON-115, Loss of Control Enclosure Cooling, Revision 25 | Procedures | ||
OP-AA-102-103, Operator Work-Around Program, Revision 4 | |||
OP-AA-102-106, Operator Response Time Program, Revision 4 | |||
ON-115, Loss of Control Enclosure Cooling, Revision 25 | |||
Condition Reports | Condition Reports | ||
4082004 4088765 4089921 4099141 4099223 4100277 4100294 4100598 4117844 | 4082004 | ||
4088765 | |||
4089921 | |||
4099141 | |||
4099223 | |||
4100277 | |||
4100294 | |||
4100598 | |||
4117844 | |||
Work Order | Work Order | ||
4308130 | 4308130 | ||
Miscellaneous L-S-29, Chilled Water System, Revision 14 | Miscellaneous | ||
L-S-29, Chilled Water System, Revision 14 | |||
71111.18 | 71111.18 | ||
Procedures CC-AA-10, Configuration Control Process, Revision 9 | Procedures | ||
CC-AA-10, Configuration Control Process, Revision 9 | |||
CC-AA-101, Engineering Change Requests, Revision 5 | CC-AA-101, Engineering Change Requests, Revision 5 | ||
IP-ENG-001, Standard Design Process, Revision 0 | IP-ENG-001, Standard Design Process, Revision 0 | ||
ST-6-076-310-2, SGTS Reactor Enclosure Secondary Containment Integrity Test, Revision 21 | ST-6-076-310-2, SGTS Reactor Enclosure Secondary Containment Integrity Test, Revision 21 | ||
Condition Reports | |||
Condition Reports 4085733 4105709 | 4085733 | ||
4105709 | |||
Work Orders 4703263 | 21117 | ||
Work Orders | |||
4703263 | |||
27391 | |||
4733863 | |||
4738484 | |||
4750273 | |||
Miscellaneous | |||
EC 622647, Inflatable Seal - Secondary Containment, Revision 2 | |||
ECR 433952 | |||
71111.19 | 71111.19 | ||
Procedures M-095-005, Replacement of Station Battery Cells, Revision 10 | Procedures | ||
M-095-005, Replacement of Station Battery Cells, Revision 10 | |||
PES-S-004, Sampling Plan, Revision 2 | PES-S-004, Sampling Plan, Revision 2 | ||
ST-2-049-100-2, RCIC Logic System Functional: Simulated Automatic Actuation Test, Revision | ST-2-049-100-2, RCIC Logic System Functional: Simulated Automatic Actuation Test, Revision | ||
ST-2-049-101-2, RCIC Logic System Functional: Isolation Logic Test, Revision 16 ST-6-092-312-1, D12 Diesel Generator Slow Start Operability Test Run, Revision 103 | ST-2-049-101-2, RCIC Logic System Functional: Isolation Logic Test, Revision 16 | ||
ST-6-092-312-1, D12 Diesel Generator Slow Start Operability Test Run, Revision 103 | |||
Condition Reports | Condition Reports | ||
0379493 0381794 4081625 4094240 4103817 4104251 | 0379493 | ||
0381794 | |||
4081625 | |||
4094240 | |||
4103817 | |||
4104251 | |||
Work Orders | Work Orders | ||
1382270 | 1382270 | ||
Miscellaneous CGIFU01, EPRI CGI Joint Utility Task Group Commercial Grade Item Evaluation for UL 198E | 243506 | ||
Inspection Report 0101903 LIM-72331, Failure Analysis of Fuses, 12/27/17 Listed Fuses, 7/9/91 | 255083 | ||
4595702 | |||
71111.22 | 4699475 | ||
Miscellaneous | |||
CGIFU01, EPRI CGI Joint Utility Task Group Commercial Grade Item Evaluation for UL 198E | |||
Inspection Report 0101903 | |||
LIM-72331, Failure Analysis of Fuses, 12/27/17 | |||
Listed Fuses, 7/9/91 | |||
71111.22 | |||
IST | |||
Procedures | |||
ST-6-052-231-1, A Loop Core Spray Pump, Valve, and Flow Test, Revision 83 | |||
ST-6-052-232-1, B Loop Core Spray Pump, Valve, and Flow Test, Revision 74 | ST-6-052-232-1, B Loop Core Spray Pump, Valve, and Flow Test, Revision 74 | ||
Routine | Routine | ||
ST-2-074-642-1, Source Range and Intermediate Range Neutron Monitor Pre-Shutdown Functional Test, Revision 8 ST-6-092-113-2, D23 Diesel Generator 24 Hour Endurance Test, Revision 43 | Procedures | ||
RT-6-051-320-1, B RHR Remote Operability Test, Revision 7 | |||
Condition Reports 4116219 | ST-2-074-642-1, Source Range and Intermediate Range Neutron Monitor Pre-Shutdown | ||
Functional Test, Revision 8 | |||
ST-6-092-113-2, D23 Diesel Generator 24 Hour Endurance Test, Revision 43 | |||
Condition Reports | |||
4116219 | |||
Containment Isolation Valve | Containment Isolation Valve | ||
Procedures ST-4-LLR-031-1, Main Steam Line | Procedures | ||
ST-4-LLR-041-1, Main Steam Line | ST-4-LLR-031-1, Main Steam Line A, Revision 13 | ||
ST-4-LLR-041-1, Main Steam Line B, Revision 12 | |||
Work Orders | Work Orders | ||
4309668 4310968 | 4309668 | ||
4310968 | |||
71124.08 | 71124.08 | ||
Procedures RP-AA-600, Radioactive Material/Waste Shipments, Revision 16 | Procedures | ||
RP-AA-600-1001, Exclusive Use and | RP-AA-600, Radioactive Material/Waste Shipments, Revision 16 | ||
RP-AA-600-1001, Exclusive Use and Emergency Response Information, Revision 9 | |||
Facility (DCF), Revision 10 RP-AA-600-1004, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Energy | RP-AA-600-1002, Highway Route Controlled Quantity/Advanced Notification for | ||
RP-AA-600-1006, Shipment of Category 1 Quantities of Radioactive Material or Waste (Category 1 RAMQC), Revision 11 RP-AA-600-1007, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Energy | Radioactive/Waste Shipments, Revision 6 | ||
RP-AA-600-1003, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Barnwell and the Defense Consolidation | |||
Facility (DCF), Revision 10 | |||
RP-AA-600-1004, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Energy Solutions Clive Utah Disposal Site | |||
Containerized Waste Facility, Revision 13 | |||
RP-AA-600-1005, Radioactive Material and Non Disposal Site Waste Shipments, Rev 19 | |||
RP-AA-600-1006, Shipment of Category 1 Quantities of Radioactive Material or Waste | |||
(Category 1 RAMQC), Revision 11 | |||
RP-AA-600-1007, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Energy Solutions Clive Utah Disposal | |||
Facility Bulk Waste Facility (BWF), Revision 8 | |||
RP-AA-600-1008, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Waste Control Specialists (WCS) Disposal | |||
Facility, Revision 5 | |||
RP-AA-600-1009, Shipment of Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive Material or Waste | |||
(Category 2 RAMQC), Revision 2 | |||
RP-AA-600-1010, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Creating Containers, Samples, | |||
Waste Streams and Waste Types, Revision 2 | |||
RP-AA-600-1011, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Gross Gamma Characterization and | |||
Generation of Shipping Paperwork, Revision 4 | |||
RP-AA-600-1012, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Direct Sample Characterization and | |||
Generation of Shipping Paperwork, Revision 2 | |||
RP-AA-600-1014, Use and Operation of WMG Software Filter Module, Revision 2 | |||
RP-AA-600-1015, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Outage Service Module, Revision 3 | RP-AA-600-1015, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Outage Service Module, Revision 3 | ||
RP-AA-600-1016, Use and Operation of the WMG Software for Characterization of Miscellaneous Items, Revision 0 RP-AA-601, Surveying Radioactive Material Shipments, Revision 20 RP-AA-602, Packaging of Radioactive Material Shipments, Revision 20 RP-AA-602-1001, Packaging of Radioactive Material/Waste Shipments, Revision 17 | RP-AA-600-1016, Use and Operation of the WMG Software for Characterization of | ||
RP-AA-602-1002, Loading Dry Active Waste and Other Waste Forms for Energy | Miscellaneous Items, Revision 0 | ||
RP-AA-601, Surveying Radioactive Material Shipments, Revision 20 | |||
RP-AA-602, Packaging of Radioactive Material Shipments, Revision 20 | |||
RP-AA-602-1001, Packaging of Radioactive Material/Waste Shipments, Revision 17 | |||
RP-AA-602-1002, Loading Dry Active Waste and Other Waste Forms for Energy Solutions | |||
Waste Acceptance Guide (WAG-501), Revision 0 | |||
RP-AA-602-1003, Radioactive Materials/Waste Shipments Transported Via Rail, Revision 1 | |||
RP-AA-603, Inspection and Loading of Radioactive Material Shipments, Rev 10 | |||
RP-AA-605, 10 CFR 61 Program, Revision 7 | |||
RP-AA-607, Radioactive Material Shipped in Accordance With IATA requirements, Revision 5 | RP-AA-607, Radioactive Material Shipped in Accordance With IATA requirements, Revision 5 | ||
RW-AA-100, Process Control Program for Radioactive Wastes, Revision 12 | RW-AA-100, Process Control Program for Radioactive Wastes, Revision 12 | ||
RW-AA-605, 10 CFR 61 Program, Revision 7 | RW-AA-605, 10 CFR 61 Program, Revision 7 | ||
Quality Assurance NOSA-LIM-16-04, Chemistry, Radwaste, Effluent and Environmental Monitoring Audit Report EnergySolutions Internal Audit CORP-16-004, Clive Facility NUPIC 24365, EnergySolutions | Quality Assurance | ||
NOSA-LIM-16-04, Chemistry, Radwaste, Effluent and Environmental Monitoring Audit Report | |||
EnergySolutions Internal Audit CORP-16-004, Clive Facility | |||
NUPIC 24365, EnergySolutions | |||
NUPIC 24515, Waste Control Specialists, LLC | NUPIC 24515, Waste Control Specialists, LLC | ||
CFR Part 61 Scaling Factors | |||
Waste Sludge Tank; Deep Bed; Dry Active Waste; Fuel Floor; Reactor Water Clean-Up | |||
Condition Reports | Condition Reports | ||
3955208 | 3955208 | ||
28930 | 28930 | ||
4085448 4092536 4092545 | 4085448 | ||
4092536 | |||
4092545 | |||
4092549 | 4092549 | ||
4092556 | 4092556 | ||
4092578 | 4092578 | ||
Training | |||
RC-102, Use of WMG Programs and Regulatory Interface | |||
RC-300, Transportation of Radioactive Material by Air | RC-300, Transportation of Radioactive Material by Air | ||
Shipments MW-16-010; MW-16-045; MW-16-059; MW-17-006; MW-17-031 | Shipments | ||
MW-16-010; MW-16-045; MW-16-059; MW-17-006; MW-17-031 | |||
71151 | 71151 | ||
Procedures LS-AA-2200, Mitigating System Performance Index Data Acquisition and Reporting, Revision 5 | Procedures | ||
NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7 | LS-AA-2200, Mitigating System Performance Index Data Acquisition and Reporting, Revision 5 | ||
NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7 | |||
Miscellaneous | |||
Operation Narrative Logs Power History Graphs | MSPI Data | ||
Operation Narrative Logs | |||
Power History Graphs | |||
71153 | 71153 | ||
Procedures ARC-BOP-1BC514 C1, Lube Oil Temp High, Revision 1 | Procedures | ||
ARC-BOP-1BC514 C1, Lube Oil Temp High, Revision 1 | |||
ARC-BOP-2BC514 B2, | ARC-BOP-2BC514 B2, | ||
: [[contact::J.W. Temp High]], Revision 1 | : [[contact::J.W. Temp High]], Revision 1 | ||
E-1, Loss of All AC Power (Station Blackout), Revision 51 | E-1, Loss of All AC Power (Station Blackout), Revision 51 | ||
E-1, Loss of All AC Power (Station Blackout), Revision 51 | E-1, Loss of All AC Power (Station Blackout), Revision 51 | ||
E-10/20, Loss of Offsite Power, Revision 56 E-10/20, Loss of Offsite Power, Revision 56 MA-AA-716-017, Station Rework Reduction Program, Revision 7 | E-10/20, Loss of Offsite Power, Revision 56 | ||
E-10/20, Loss of Offsite Power, Revision 56 | |||
MA-AA-716-017, Station Rework Reduction Program, Revision 7 | |||
S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel Generators, Revision 73 | S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel Generators, Revision 73 | ||
S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel Generators, Revision 74 | S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel Generators, Revision 74 | ||
ST-2-020-401-1, Electrical Power Systems 1BG501 Diesel Generator Critical and Non-Critical Instruments Calibration / Functional Test, Revision 31 ST-6-092-112-1, D12 Diesel Generator 24 Hour Endurance Test, Revision 39 ST-6-092-312-1, D12 Diesel Generator Slow Start Operability Test Run, Revision 103 | ST-2-020-401-1, Electrical Power Systems 1BG501 Diesel Generator Critical and Non-Critical | ||
Instruments Calibration / Functional Test, Revision 31 | |||
ST-6-092-112-1, D12 Diesel Generator 24 Hour Endurance Test, Revision 39 | |||
ST-6-092-312-1, D12 Diesel Generator Slow Start Operability Test Run, Revision 103 | |||
ST-6-092-316-1, D12 Diesel Generator Fast Start Operability Test Run, Revision 54 | ST-6-092-316-1, D12 Diesel Generator Fast Start Operability Test Run, Revision 54 | ||
ST-6-092-362-2, D22 Diesel Generator Operability Verification, Revision 40 | ST-6-092-362-2, D22 Diesel Generator Operability Verification, Revision 40 | ||
ST-6-092-362-2, D22 Diesel Generator Operability Verification, Revision 40 | ST-6-092-362-2, D22 Diesel Generator Operability Verification, Revision 40 | ||
Condition Reports 1108417 | Condition Reports | ||
4069001 4070641 4073004 4081882 4082219 | 1108417 | ||
22131 | |||
24515 | |||
21268 | |||
4049989 | |||
4062096 | |||
4069001 | |||
4070641 | |||
4073004 | |||
4081882 | |||
4082219 | |||
Work Orders | Work Orders | ||
2075815 2079589 | 2075815 | ||
4650858 4652385 4652410 4652412 4663824 4672813 | 2079589 | ||
4686262 4697246 | 292476 | ||
Miscellaneous ANSI/ASME B1.20.1, Pipe Threads, General Purpose (Inch), 1983 | 4318057 | ||
LIM-64785, Failure Analysis of a Threaded Pipe Nipple from Limerick Station, 12/5/2017 L-S-07, Diesel Generator and Auxiliary Systems, Revision 15 L-S-07, Diesel Generator and Auxiliary Systems, Revision 15 | 4642785 | ||
4650838 | |||
4650858 | |||
4652385 | |||
4652410 | |||
4652412 | |||
4663824 | |||
4672813 | |||
4686262 | |||
4697246 | |||
Miscellaneous | |||
ANSI/ASME B1.20.1, Pipe Threads, General Purpose (Inch), 1983 | |||
LIM-64785, Failure Analysis of a Threaded Pipe Nipple from Limerick Station, 12/5/2017 | |||
L-S-07, Diesel Generator and Auxiliary Systems, Revision 15 | |||
L-S-07, Diesel Generator and Auxiliary Systems, Revision 15 | |||
PES-S-006, Code Reconciliation, Revision 6 | PES-S-006, Code Reconciliation, Revision 6 | ||
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 2100 RENAISSANCE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100 KING OF PRUSSIA, PA | UNITED STATES | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
REGION I | |||
2100 RENAISSANCE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100 | |||
KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-2713 | |||
May 11, 2018 | May 11, 2018 | ||
Mr. Bryan C. Hanson | Mr. Bryan C. Hanson | ||
Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC | Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC | ||
President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL | President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear | ||
4300 Winfield Road | |||
SUBJECT: LIMERICK GENERATING STATION - INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT | Warrenville, IL 60555 | ||
SUBJECT: | |||
LIMERICK GENERATING STATION - INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT | |||
05000352/2018001 AND 05000353/2018001 | 05000352/2018001 AND 05000353/2018001 | ||
Dear Mr. Hanson: | Dear Mr. Hanson: | ||
On March 31, 2018, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection | On March 31, 2018, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection | ||
at Limerick Generating Station (LGS), Units 1 and 2. On April 12, 2018, the NRC inspectors | at Limerick Generating Station (LGS), Units 1 and 2. On April 12, 2018, the NRC inspectors | ||
discussed the results of this inspection with Rick Libra, Site Vice-President, and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report. | discussed the results of this inspection with Rick Libra, Site Vice-President, and other members | ||
of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report. | |||
NRC inspectors documented two findings of very low safety significance (Green) in this report. | NRC inspectors documented two findings of very low safety significance (Green) in this report. | ||
These findings involved violations of NRC | These findings involved violations of NRC requirements. The NRC is treating these violations | ||
as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the Enforcement Policy. | |||
If you contest the violations or significance of these NCVs, you should provide a response within | If you contest the violations or significance of these NCVs, you should provide a response within | ||
Regulatory Commission, ATTN: | days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear | ||
Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with | |||
copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC | copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC | ||
Resident Inspector at LG | Resident Inspector at LG | ||
: [[contact::S. In addition]], if you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the | : [[contact::S. In addition]], if you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment, | ||
: [[contact::U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission]], ATTN: | you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis | ||
for your disagreement, to the | |||
: [[contact::U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission]], ATTN: Document Control | |||
Desk, Washington, DC, 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I, and | Desk, Washington, DC, 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I, and | ||
the NRC Resident Inspector at LGS. | the NRC Resident Inspector at LGS. | ||
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection | This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection | ||
and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the | and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the NRCs Public Document | ||
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2.390, | Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2.390, | ||
Sincerely, | Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding. | ||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
James | James | ||
: [[contact::A. Krafty]], Acting Chief Reactor Projects Branch 4 | : [[contact::A. Krafty]], Acting Chief | ||
Reactor Projects Branch 4 | |||
Division of Reactor Projects | Division of Reactor Projects | ||
B. Hanson | B. Hanson | ||
Docket Numbers: 50-352 and 50-353 | |||
License Numbers: NPF-39 and NPF-85 | |||
Enclosure: | Enclosure: | ||
Inspection Report 05000352/2018001 | Inspection Report 05000352/2018001 | ||
| Line 532: | Line 692: | ||
Distribution via ListServ | Distribution via ListServ | ||
ML18131A015 | ML18131A015 | ||
Non-Sensitive | SUNSI Review | ||
Publicly Available | |||
OFFICE RI/DRP RI/DRP RI/DRP | Non-Sensitive | ||
Sensitive | |||
Publicly Available | |||
Non-Publicly Available | |||
OFFICE | |||
RI/DRP | |||
RI/DRP | |||
RI/DRP | |||
NAME | |||
S. Rutenkroger | |||
S. Barber/jk for | |||
J. Krafty | |||
DATE | |||
05/10/18 | |||
5/10/18 | |||
5/11/18 | |||
Report | U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
Inspection Report | |||
Docket Numbers: | |||
50-352 and 50-353 | |||
License Numbers: | |||
NPF-39 and NPF-85 | |||
Report Numbers: | |||
05000352/2018001 and 05000353/2018001 | |||
Enterprise Identifier: | |||
I-2018-001-0071 | |||
Inspectors: | Licensee: | ||
: [[contact::S. Rutenkroger]], PhD, Senior Resident Inspector | Exelon Generation Company, LLC | ||
Facility: | |||
Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 & 2 | |||
Location: | |||
Sanatoga, PA 19464 | |||
Inspection Dates: | |||
January 1, 2018 through March 31, 2018 | |||
Inspectors: | |||
: [[contact::S. Rutenkroger]], PhD, Senior Resident Inspector | |||
: [[contact::M. Fannon]], Resident Inspector | : [[contact::M. Fannon]], Resident Inspector | ||
: [[contact::H. Anagnostopoulos]], Senior Health Physicist | : [[contact::H. Anagnostopoulos]], Senior Health Physicist | ||
: [[contact::J. Furia]], Senior Health Physicist | : [[contact::J. Furia]], Senior Health Physicist | ||
Approved By: | Approved By: | ||
: [[contact::J. Krafty]], Acting Chief | : [[contact::J. Krafty]], Acting Chief | ||
Division of Reactor Projects | |||
SUMMARY | Reactor Projects Branch 4 | ||
Division of Reactor Projects | |||
SUMMARY | |||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring Exelons performance at | |||
Limerick Generating Station Units 1 and 2 by conducting the baseline inspections described in | Limerick Generating Station Units 1 and 2 by conducting the baseline inspections described in | ||
this report in accordance with the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process | this report in accordance with the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process | ||
is the | is the NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors. | ||
Refer to https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more information. NRC | |||
Refer to https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html | identified and self-revealed findings, violations, and additional items are summarized in the table | ||
for more information. NRC identified and self-revealed findings, violations, and additional items are summarized in the table below. | below. | ||
List of Findings and Violations | List of Findings and Violations | ||
Failure of Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Pipe Nipple Fitting Cornerstone Significance Cross-cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating | Failure of Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Pipe Nipple Fitting | ||
Systems Green NCV | Cornerstone | ||
Significance | |||
Cross-cutting | |||
Aspect | |||
Report | |||
Section | |||
Mitigating | |||
Systems | |||
Green NCV | |||
05000353/2018001-01 | 05000353/2018001-01 | ||
Opened/Closed [P.1] - Identification 71153 A self-revealed Green non-cited violation (NCV) of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, | Opened/Closed | ||
Exelon failed to correct a degraded lube oil pipe nipple fitting on the | [P.1] - | ||
Identification | |||
71153 | |||
A self-revealed Green non-cited violation (NCV) of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, | |||
Corrective Action, and LGS Unit 2 technical specification (TS) 3.8.1.1 was identified when | |||
Exelon failed to correct a degraded lube oil pipe nipple fitting on the D22 emergency diesel | |||
generator (EDG) when maintenance was performed to address leakage which caused | generator (EDG) when maintenance was performed to address leakage which caused | ||
inoperability of the EDG for greater than its TS allowed outage time. | inoperability of the EDG for greater than its TS allowed outage time. | ||
Emergency Diesel Generator Combustion Air Overheating Cornerstone Significance Cross-cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating | Emergency Diesel Generator Combustion Air Overheating | ||
Systems Green NCV | Cornerstone | ||
Significance | |||
Cross-cutting | |||
Aspect | |||
Report | |||
Section | |||
Mitigating | |||
Systems | |||
Green NCV | |||
05000352/2018001-02 | 05000352/2018001-02 | ||
Opened/Closed | Opened/Closed | ||
[P.3] - | |||
EDGs which led to the | Resolution | ||
71153 | |||
A self-revealed Green NCV of LGS Unit 1 TS 6.8.1 and TS 3.8.1.1 was identified when Exelon | |||
failed to properly maintain an operating procedure to maintain a fail-safe design feature for the | |||
EDGs which led to the D12 EDG combustion air overheating and caused the EDG to be | |||
inoperable for greater than its TS allowed outage time. | inoperable for greater than its TS allowed outage time. | ||
Additional Tracking Items | Additional Tracking Items | ||
Type Issue number Title Report | Type | ||
Section Status LER 05000353/2017-008-00 | Issue number | ||
Title | |||
Report | |||
Section | |||
Status | |||
LER | |||
05000353/2017-008-00 | |||
05000353/2017-008-01 | 05000353/2017-008-01 | ||
EDG Inoperable for Greater | EDG Inoperable for Greater | ||
Than 30 Days Resulting in a | Than 30 Days Resulting in a | ||
Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications 71153 Closed | Condition Prohibited by | ||
LER 05000352/2018-001-00 D12 EDG Inoperable for | Technical Specifications | ||
71153 | |||
Closed | |||
LER | |||
05000352/2018-001-00 | |||
D12 EDG Inoperable for | |||
Greater than 30 Days | Greater than 30 Days | ||
Resulting in a Condition | Resulting in a Condition | ||
Prohibited by TS 71153 Closed | Prohibited by TS | ||
71153 | |||
Closed | |||
PLANT STATUS | PLANT STATUS | ||
Unit 1 began the inspection period at rated thermal power. On March 25 to 26, 2018, the unit | Unit 1 began the inspection period at rated thermal power. On March 25 to 26, 2018, the unit | ||
was down powered and shutdown for a planned refueling outage. The unit remained shutdown | was down powered and shutdown for a planned refueling outage. The unit remained shutdown | ||
for the refueling outage for the remainder of the inspection period. | for the refueling outage for the remainder of the inspection period. | ||
Unit 2 began the inspection period at rated thermal power. On March 17, 2018, the unit was | |||
Unit 2 began the inspection period at rated thermal power. On March 17, 2018, the unit was down powered to 64 percent to repair a main condenser tube leak. The unit was returned to rated thermal power the same day and remained at or near rated thermal power for the | down powered to 64 percent to repair a main condenser tube leak. The unit was returned to | ||
rated thermal power the same day and remained at or near rated thermal power for the | |||
remainder of the inspection period. | remainder of the inspection period. | ||
INSPECTION SCOPES | INSPECTION SCOPES | ||
Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, | Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in | ||
Identification and Resolution. | effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with | ||
observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess | their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading- | ||
rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared | |||
complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met | |||
consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection | |||
Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors performed plant status activities described in | |||
IMC 2515 Appendix D, Plant Status and conducted routine reviews using IP 71152, Problem | |||
Identification and Resolution. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, | |||
observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess Exelons performance and compliance | |||
with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards. | with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards. | ||
REACTOR SAFETY | REACTOR SAFETY | ||
71111.01 - Adverse Weather Protection | 71111.01 - Adverse Weather Protection | ||
Impending Severe Weather (2 samples) | Impending Severe Weather (2 samples) | ||
(1) The inspectors evaluated readiness for impending adverse weather conditions for the | |||
onset of winter weather, including high winds, on January 5, 2018. | |||
(2) The inspectors evaluated readiness for impending adverse weather conditions for the | |||
onset of winter weather, including high winds, on March 2, 2018. | |||
71111.04 - Equipment Alignment | 71111.04 - Equipment Alignment | ||
Partial Walkdown (5 samples) | Partial Walkdown (5 samples) | ||
The inspectors evaluated system configurations during partial walkdowns of the following | The inspectors evaluated system configurations during partial walkdowns of the following | ||
systems/trains: | systems/trains: | ||
(1) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection on January 16 and 17, 2018 | |||
(3) Unit 2 | (2) Unit 1 D11 and D13 emergency diesel generators (EDGs) on February 5, 2018 | ||
February 5 through 9, 2018 (4) Unit 1 | (3) Unit 2 2A batteries and chargers during 2BD101 battery planned maintenance on | ||
February 5 through 9, 2018 | |||
(4) Unit 1 B residual heat removal subsystem in shutdown cooling during the A emergency | |||
core cooling subsystem maintenance window on March 27, 2018 | |||
(5) Unit 1 D12 EDG during the division 1 and 3 direct current bus maintenance window on | |||
March 28, 2018 | March 28, 2018 | ||
| Line 625: | Line 872: | ||
The inspectors evaluated fire protection program implementation in the following selected | The inspectors evaluated fire protection program implementation in the following selected | ||
areas: | areas: | ||
(1) Fire area 2, Unit common 13.2kV switchgear room, elevation 217, on January 8, 2018 | |||
(3) Fire area 10, Unit 2 class 1E battery rooms, elevation 239 | (2) Fire area 8, Unit 1 class 1E battery room, elevation 239, on January 23, 2018 | ||
(4) Fire area 28, Unit common standby gas treatment area rooms, elevation 332 | (3) Fire area 10, Unit 2 class 1E battery rooms, elevation 239, on February 5, 2018 | ||
February 27, 201 (5) Fire area 43, Unit 1 safeguard isolation valve area room 309, elevation 217 | (4) Fire area 28, Unit common standby gas treatment area rooms, elevation 332, on | ||
February 27, 201 | |||
(5) Fire area 43, Unit 1 safeguard isolation valve area room 309, elevation 217, on | |||
March 28, 2018 | March 28, 2018 | ||
71111.11 - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance | 71111.11 - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance | ||
Operator Requalification (1 sample) | Operator Requalification (1 sample) | ||
The inspectors observed and evaluated | The inspectors observed and evaluated licensed operator simulator training scenarios on | ||
licensed operator simulator training scenarios on | February 20, 2018. | ||
February 20, 2018. | |||
Operator Performance (1 sample) | Operator Performance (1 sample) | ||
The inspectors observed the downpower and normal plant shutdown of Unit 1 for a planned | The inspectors observed the downpower and normal plant shutdown of Unit 1 for a planned | ||
| Line 641: | Line 888: | ||
71111.12 - Maintenance Effectiveness | 71111.12 - Maintenance Effectiveness | ||
Routine Maintenance Effectiveness (2 samples) | Routine Maintenance Effectiveness (2 samples) | ||
The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of routine maintenance activities associated with the following equipment and/or safety significant functions: | The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of routine maintenance activities associated | ||
with the following equipment and/or safety significant functions: | |||
(1) Unit 1 reactor manual control system | |||
(2) Unit 2 reactor manual control system | (2) Unit 2 reactor manual control system | ||
71111.13 - Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control (6 samples) | 71111.13 - Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control (6 samples) | ||
The inspectors evaluated the risk assessments for the following planned and emergent | The inspectors evaluated the risk assessments for the following planned and emergent | ||
work activities: | work activities: | ||
(1) Unit 2 reactor core isolation cooling relay replacements on January 16 and 17, 2018 | |||
(3) Unit 2 | (2) Unit common B control room emergency fresh air system testing on February 7, 2018 | ||
(4) Unit common | (3) Unit 2 A residual heat removal maintenance on February 26 and 27, 2018 | ||
(5) Unit common | (4) Unit common A standby gas treatment system maintenance on February 27, 2018 | ||
(5) Unit common A emergency service water, A standby gas treatment system, and | |||
Unit 2 A reactor enclosure recirculation system maintenance on March 1, 2018 | |||
(6) Unit 1 A emergency core cooling system maintenance during reduced core inventory | |||
in the refueling outage on March 27 and 28, 2018 | |||
71111.15 - Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments (6 samples) | 71111.15 - Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments (6 samples) | ||
The inspectors evaluated the following operability determinations and functionality | The inspectors evaluated the following operability determinations and functionality | ||
assessments: | assessments: | ||
(1) Unit 2, D21 EDG room low temperature alarm on December 31, 2017 | |||
(2) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection condensate pump discharge check valve failure on | (2) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection condensate pump discharge check valve failure on | ||
January 25, 2018 (3) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection vacuum breaker check valve oversized disc on | January 25, 2018 | ||
January 31, 2018 (4) Unit common | (3) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection vacuum breaker check valve oversized disc on | ||
on January 31, 2018 (5) Unit 2 | January 31, 2018 | ||
(4) Unit common A emergency service water pump motor step voltage test leakage current | |||
on January 31, 2018 | |||
(5) Unit 2 D21 EDG multiple battery ground alarms while raising speed during the slow | |||
start surveillance test on February 2, 2018 | |||
(6) Unit common, B control room air supply controller not properly maintaining room | |||
temperature on February 4, 2018 | temperature on February 4, 2018 | ||
71111.18 - Plant Modifications (2 samples) | 71111.18 - Plant Modifications (2 samples) | ||
The inspectors evaluated the following temporary or permanent modifications: | The inspectors evaluated the following temporary or permanent modifications: | ||
(1) Engineering change package 622647 - Inflatable Seal - Secondary Containment | (1) Engineering change package 622647 - Inflatable Seal - Secondary Containment | ||
(2) Engineering change request 433952, | (2) Engineering change request 433952, D23 Repair of the Blower Inspection Cover Bolt | ||
Holes Using Stainless Steel Heli-Coil Thread Inserts | |||
71111.19 - Post Maintenance Testing (6 samples) | 71111.19 - Post Maintenance Testing (6 samples) | ||
The inspectors evaluated post maintenance testing for the following maintenance/repair activities: | The inspectors evaluated post maintenance testing for the following maintenance/repair | ||
activities: | |||
(3) Unit 1 | (1) Unit 2 D24 EDG fuse replacement following an intermittent issue in the automatic start | ||
replacement on February 5, 2018 (4) Unit 2 | logic circuit on December 6, 2017 | ||
(5) Unit 2 | (2) Unit 2 reactor core isolation cooling relay replacements on January 16 and 17, 2018 | ||
(6) Unit 2 | (3) Unit 1 D12 EDG air cooler temperature indicator controller pressure control valve (PCV) | ||
replacement on February 5, 2018 | |||
(4) Unit 2 B2 battery cell replacements on February 5 and 6, 2018 | |||
(5) Unit 2 B2 battery charger current adjustment on February 15, 2018 | |||
(6) Unit 2 D24 EDG heating, ventilation, and cooling fan controller replacement on | |||
February 22, 2018 | February 22, 2018 | ||
71111.20 - Refueling and Other Outage Activities | 71111.20 - Refueling and Other Outage Activities | ||
The inspectors evaluated the Unit 1 refueling outage 1R17 from March 26, 2018, through the end of the inspection period. The following portions of the inspection procedure were | The inspectors evaluated the Unit 1 refueling outage 1R17 from March 26, 2018, through | ||
the end of the inspection period. The following portions of the inspection procedure were | |||
not performed during this period. | not performed during this period. | ||
(1) Fatigue Management | |||
(2) Startup | (2) Startup | ||
71111.22 - Surveillance Testing | 71111.22 - Surveillance Testing | ||
The inspectors evaluated the following surveillance tests: | The inspectors evaluated the following surveillance tests: | ||
Routine (3 samples) | Routine (3 samples) | ||
(1) ST-6-092-113-2, D23 EDG 24 hour endurance run on January 18 and 19, 2018 | |||
(2) RT-6-051-320-1, Unit 1 B residual heat removal remote operation test on | |||
February 7, 2018 | |||
(3) ST-2-074-642-1, Unit 1 source range and intermediate range neutron monitors pre- | |||
shutdown testing on March 18, 2018 | |||
In-service (2 samples) | In-service (2 samples) | ||
(1) ST-6-052-231-1, Unit 1 A core spray pump, valve, and flow test on January 4, 2018 | |||
(2) ST-6-052-232-1, Unit 1 | (2) ST-6-052-232-1, Unit 1 B core spray pump, valve, and flow test on March 10, 2018 | ||
Containment Isolation Valve (2 samples) | Containment Isolation Valve (2 samples) | ||
(1) ST-4-LLR-031-1, Unit 1 main steam line A inboard and outboard isolation valves | |||
leakage rate testing on March 29, 2018 | |||
(2) ST-4-LLR-041-1, Unit 1 main steam line B inboard and outboard isolation valves | |||
leakage rate testing on March 29, 2018 | |||
RADIATION SAFETY | RADIATION SAFETY | ||
71124.02 - Occupational As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) Planning and Controls | 71124.02 - Occupational As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) Planning and Controls | ||
Radiological Work Planning (1 sample) | Radiological Work Planning (1 sample) | ||
The inspectors evaluated | The inspectors evaluated Exelons radiological work planning by reviewing the following | ||
activities: | |||
(1) ALARA Plan 2017-101 | |||
(2) ALARA Plan 2017-050 | (2) ALARA Plan 2017-050 | ||
(3) ALARA Plan 2017-052 | (3) ALARA Plan 2017-052 | ||
Verification of Dose Estimates and Exposure Tracking Systems (1 sample) | Verification of Dose Estimates and Exposure Tracking Systems (1 sample) | ||
The inspectors evaluated dose estimates and exposure tracking. | The inspectors evaluated dose estimates and exposure tracking. | ||
71124.08 - Radioactive Solid Waste Processing and Radioactive Material Handling, Storage, and Transportation | 71124.08 - Radioactive Solid Waste Processing and Radioactive Material Handling, Storage, | ||
and Transportation | |||
Radioactive Material Storage (1 sample) | Radioactive Material Storage (1 sample) | ||
The inspectors observed radioactive waste container storage areas and verified the postings | The inspectors observed radioactive waste container storage areas and verified the postings | ||
| Line 706: | Line 976: | ||
Radioactive Waste System Walkdown (1 sample) | Radioactive Waste System Walkdown (1 sample) | ||
The inspectors walked down the following: | The inspectors walked down the following: | ||
Accessible portions of liquid and solid radioactive waste processing systems to verify current system alignment and material condition | |||
Accessible portions of liquid and solid radioactive waste processing systems to verify | |||
current system alignment and material condition | |||
Abandoned in place radioactive waste processing equipment to review the controls | |||
in place to ensure protection of personnel | |||
Changes made to the radioactive waste processing systems since the last inspection | |||
Processes for mixing and transferring radioactive waste resin and/or sludge | |||
discharges into shipping/disposal containers | |||
Current methods and procedures for dewatering waste | |||
Waste Characterization and Classification (1 sample) | Waste Characterization and Classification (1 sample) | ||
The inspectors identified radioactive waste streams and reviewed radiochemical sample analysis results to support radioactive waste characterization. The inspectors reviewed the use of scaling factors and calculations to account for difficult-to-measure radionuclides. | The inspectors identified radioactive waste streams and reviewed radiochemical sample | ||
analysis results to support radioactive waste characterization. The inspectors reviewed the | |||
use of scaling factors and calculations to account for difficult-to-measure radionuclides. | |||
Shipment Preparation (1 sample) | Shipment Preparation (1 sample) | ||
The inspectors reviewed the records of shipment packaging, surveying, labeling, marking, placarding, vehicle checks, emergency instructions, disposal manifest, shipping papers provided to the driver, and | The inspectors reviewed the records of shipment packaging, surveying, labeling, marking, | ||
placarding, vehicle checks, emergency instructions, disposal manifest, shipping papers | |||
provided to the driver, and Exelons verification of shipment readiness. | |||
Shipping Records (1 sample) | Shipping Records (1 sample) | ||
The inspectors reviewed selected non-excepted package shipment records. | The inspectors reviewed selected non-excepted package shipment records. | ||
OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE | OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE | ||
71151 - Performance Indicator Verification (6 samples) | 71151 - Performance Indicator Verification (6 samples) | ||
The inspectors verified | The inspectors verified Exelons performance indicator submittals listed below for the | ||
period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. | period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. | ||
(1) Unit 1 and Unit 2 Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours | |||
(1) Unit 1 and Unit 2 Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours | (2) Unit 1 and Unit 2 High Pressure Injection Systems | ||
(2) Unit 1 and Unit 2 High Pressure Injection Systems | (3) Unit 1 and Unit 2 Heat Removal Systems | ||
71153 - Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion | 71153 - Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion | ||
Licensee Event Reports (LER) (2 samples) | Licensee Event Reports (LER) (2 samples) | ||
The inspectors evaluated the following licensee event reports which can be accessed at | The inspectors evaluated the following licensee event reports which can be accessed at | ||
https://lersearch.inl.gov/LERSearchCriteria.aspx | https://lersearch.inl.gov/LERSearchCriteria.aspx: | ||
(1) LER 05000353/2017-008-00 and 05000353/2017-008-01, EDG Inoperable for Greater | |||
a Condition Prohibited by TS, on February 5, 2018. The review for this event is documented in the inspection results section. | Than 30 Days Resulting in a Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications, on | ||
December 11, 2017, and February 22, 2018. The review for this event is documented in | |||
the inspection results section. | |||
(2) LER 05000352/2018-001-00, D12 EDG Inoperable for Greater than 30 Days Resulting in | |||
a Condition Prohibited by TS, on February 5, 2018. The review for this event is | |||
documented in the inspection results section. | |||
INSPECTION RESULTS | INSPECTION RESULTS | ||
Failure of Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Pipe Nipple Fitting | Failure of Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Pipe Nipple Fitting | ||
Cornerstone | Cornerstone | ||
Significance Cross-cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating | Significance | ||
Systems Green NCV | Cross-cutting | ||
Aspect | |||
Report | |||
Section | |||
Mitigating | |||
Systems | |||
Green | |||
NCV | |||
05000353/2018001-01 | 05000353/2018001-01 | ||
Opened/Closed [P.1] - Identification 71153 A self-revealed Green non-cited violation (NCV) of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, | Opened/Closed | ||
greater than its TS allowed outage time. Description: | [P.1] - | ||
Identification | |||
71153 | |||
A self-revealed Green non-cited violation (NCV) of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, | |||
Corrective Action, and LGS Unit 2 technical specification (TS) 3.8.1.1 was identified when | |||
Exelon failed to correct a degraded lube oil pipe nipple fitting on the D22 EDG when | |||
maintenance was performed to address leakage which caused inoperability of the EDG for | |||
greater than its TS allowed outage time. | |||
Description: The EDG systems are safety related standby emergency power systems for | |||
LGS Units 1 and 2 consisting of four diesel generator sets per unit. Each EDG has a lube oil | |||
system that cools the diesel engine, lubricates the engine wear surfaces (moving parts), and | |||
captures friction wear products. On October 11, 2017, during testing of the D22 EDG, | |||
Exelon personnel identified a lube oil leak from a 0.5 inch tapered thread pipe nipple fitting | Exelon personnel identified a lube oil leak from a 0.5 inch tapered thread pipe nipple fitting | ||
between the lube oil filter and the lube oil filter vent valve. The personnel estimated the leak to be approximately 0.03125 gallons per minute (gpm) (about one-half cup per minute), and | between the lube oil filter and the lube oil filter vent valve. The personnel estimated the leak | ||
Exelon declared the EDG inoperable. | to be approximately 0.03125 gallons per minute (gpm) (about one-half cup per minute), and | ||
Exelon declared the EDG inoperable. | |||
Exelon performed an equipment corrective action program evaluation and identified that the same fitting was found to be leaking and/or weeping on August 31, 2010, and October 3, 2012. After identifying leakage on August 31, 2010, Exelon removed, cleaned, visually inspected, and reinstalled the fitting with thread sealant on November 29, 2011. After the | Exelon performed an equipment corrective action program evaluation and identified that the | ||
same fitting was found to be leaking and/or weeping on August 31, 2010, and October 3, | |||
2012. After identifying leakage on August 31, 2010, Exelon removed, cleaned, visually | |||
inspected, and reinstalled the fitting with thread sealant on November 29, 2011. After the | |||
second identification of leakage on October 3, 2012, Exelon performed a similar repair for a | second identification of leakage on October 3, 2012, Exelon performed a similar repair for a | ||
second time on August 29, 2013. Exelon planned a similar repair when the fitting leaked for a | second time on August 29, 2013. Exelon planned a similar repair when the fitting leaked for a | ||
third time on September 7, 2017. The repair was initially planned for October 6, 2017, but | third time on September 7, 2017. The repair was initially planned for October 6, 2017, but | ||
was subsequently rescheduled for November 3, 2017. Exelon identified three through-wall cracks and irregular threads in the fitting and concluded the apparent cause of the failure on October 11, 2017, was age related cyclic fatigue induced by diesel engine vibration. Exelon | was subsequently rescheduled for November 3, 2017. Exelon identified three through-wall | ||
cracks and irregular threads in the fitting and concluded the apparent cause of the failure on | |||
October 11, 2017, was age related cyclic fatigue induced by diesel engine vibration. Exelon | |||
also determined that the repairs made in 2011 and 2013 contributed to the stresses and crack | also determined that the repairs made in 2011 and 2013 contributed to the stresses and crack | ||
development and propagation rate based on galling of the threads, wrench marks on the | development and propagation rate based on galling of the threads, wrench marks on the | ||
exterior of the fitting, and deeper thread engagement. | exterior of the fitting, and deeper thread engagement. | ||
The inspectors determined that a rework investigation was required by Exelon procedure MA- | The inspectors determined that a rework investigation was required by Exelon procedure MA- | ||
AA-716-017, | AA-716-017, Station Rework Reduction Program, when leakage was identified the second | ||
time. Exelon was unable to find evidence that a rework investigation was performed or | time. Exelon was unable to find evidence that a rework investigation was performed or | ||
provide a basis for not performing one. The inspectors concluded a rework investigation | provide a basis for not performing one. The inspectors concluded a rework investigation | ||
would have reasonably provided additional focus and oversight on the subsequent maintenance performed on August 29, 2013. The inspectors determined that additional focus would have provided an opportunity to identify the galled threads on the pipe nipple, the high | would have reasonably provided additional focus and oversight on the subsequent | ||
maintenance performed on August 29, 2013. The inspectors determined that additional focus | |||
would have provided an opportunity to identify the galled threads on the pipe nipple, the high | |||
installation torque required to insert the nipple, and the deeper thread engagement of the | installation torque required to insert the nipple, and the deeper thread engagement of the | ||
nipple following the repair (the nipple was essentially fully inserted into the housing). The | nipple following the repair (the nipple was essentially fully inserted into the housing). The | ||
fittings condition indicated additional tightening of at least two additional threads beyond | |||
reasonable opportunity to foresee and correct the degraded fitting as required by Exelon procedure PI-AA-125, | original installation which is outside the tolerances of ASME B1.20.1, Pipe Threads, General | ||
Purpose (Inch). Based on these conditions, the inspectors determined that Exelon had a | |||
reasonable opportunity to foresee and correct the degraded fitting as required by Exelon | |||
procedure PI-AA-125, Corrective Action Program (CAP) Procedure, when the second repair | |||
was performed. | was performed. | ||
The inspectors also noted that when maintenance personnel fabricated a replacement fitting | The inspectors also noted that when maintenance personnel fabricated a replacement fitting | ||
after the October 11, 2017, failure, the new fitting leaked during post-maintenance testing. | after the October 11, 2017, failure, the new fitting leaked during post-maintenance testing. | ||
Maintenance personnel responded by tightening the fitting further, and the fitting leaked again | Maintenance personnel responded by tightening the fitting further, and the fitting leaked again | ||
during post-maintenance testing. Exelon then removed the fitting, determined the threads of the new fitting were not satisfactory, that personnel had not verified the threads were properly cut, and fabricated a second new fitting. Although the performance deficiency occurred on | during post-maintenance testing. Exelon then removed the fitting, determined the threads of | ||
the new fitting were not satisfactory, that personnel had not verified the threads were properly | |||
cut, and fabricated a second new fitting. Although the performance deficiency occurred on | |||
August 29, 2013, the inspectors considered the above and determined the applicable cross- | August 29, 2013, the inspectors considered the above and determined the applicable cross- | ||
cutting aspect of not recognizing deviations from ASME standards, training, and skill of the | cutting aspect of not recognizing deviations from ASME standards, training, and skill of the | ||
craft when taking action to address leakage was indicative of current performance. | craft when taking action to address leakage was indicative of current performance. | ||
Corrective Action(s): | Corrective Action(s): Exelon replaced the fitting and restored operability of the EDG on | ||
October 15, 2017, revised equipment data to require replacement of a pipe nipple fitting | |||
instead of reusing if a future leak is identified, and initiated actions to replace similar fittings | instead of reusing if a future leak is identified, and initiated actions to replace similar fittings | ||
for extent of condition. | for extent of condition. | ||
Corrective Action Reference(s): | Corrective Action Reference(s): Issue Report (IR) 4070641 | ||
Performance Deficiency: | Performance Assessment: | ||
lube oil pipe nipple fitting on the | Performance Deficiency: The inspectors determined that the failure to correct a degraded | ||
leakage was reasonably within | lube oil pipe nipple fitting on the D22 EDG when maintenance was performed to address | ||
leakage was reasonably within Exelons ability to foresee and correct and should have been | |||
prevented. | prevented. | ||
Screening: | Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor | ||
because it adversely affected the equipment performance attribute of the mitigating systems | because it adversely affected the equipment performance attribute of the mitigating systems | ||
cornerstone to ensure the availability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences (i.e. core damage). Specifically, the issue caused the | cornerstone to ensure the availability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent | ||
undesirable consequences (i.e. core damage). Specifically, the issue caused the D22 EDG | |||
to be inoperable from September 7 to October 15, 2017. | to be inoperable from September 7 to October 15, 2017. | ||
Significance: | Significance: The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using IMC 0609, | ||
Appendix A, Exhibit 2, and determined that this finding was of very low safety significance | |||
(Green). Specifically, the inspectors, in consultation with a Region I senior reactor analyst | (Green). Specifically, the inspectors, in consultation with a Region I senior reactor analyst | ||
(SRA), determined that the condition did not represent an actual loss of the | (SRA), determined that the condition did not represent an actual loss of the D22 EDG | ||
probabilistic risk assessment safety function, i.e. the capability to provide power for up to 24 | |||
hours. The lube oil storage tank contained over 216 gallons during the period. | |||
The lube oil consumption rate was less than 0.05 gpm. The leak rate was consistent at about | The lube oil consumption rate was less than 0.05 gpm. The leak rate was consistent at about | ||
0.03125 gpm. Therefore, at a minimum the lube oil storage tank contained sufficient oil to | 0.03125 gpm. Therefore, at a minimum the lube oil storage tank contained sufficient oil to | ||
make up to the | make up to the D22 EDG oil reservoir for over 40 hours of EDG operation. | ||
Cross-Cutting Aspect: | Cross-Cutting Aspect: The inspectors determined that this finding has a cross-cutting aspect | ||
in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution, Identification, because Exelon personnel | |||
did not recognize deviations from standards, training, and skill of the craft when addressing | |||
leakage. [P.1] | |||
Enforcement: | Enforcement: | ||
Violation: | Violation: 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, requires, in part, that | ||
LGS Unit 2 TS 3.8.1.1 requires that an inoperable diesel generator be restored to an operable status within 30 days or the unit be in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours and in | measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as | ||
cold shutdown within the following 24 hours. Contrary to the above, from August 29, 2013 to October 15, 2017, a condition adverse to quality was not promptly corrected. Specifically, repairs made to the | deficiencies, defective material, and non-conformances are promptly identified and corrected. | ||
the cracked fitting which caused the leakage. This caused the | |||
LGS Unit 2 TS 3.8.1.1 requires that an inoperable diesel generator be restored to an operable | |||
status within 30 days or the unit be in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours and in | |||
cold shutdown within the following 24 hours. Contrary to the above, from August 29, 2013 to | |||
October 15, 2017, a condition adverse to quality was not promptly corrected. Specifically, | |||
repairs made to the D22 lube oil filter housing to vent valve pipe nipple fitting failed to correct | |||
the cracked fitting which caused the leakage. This caused the D22 EDG to be inoperable | |||
from September 7, 2017, to October 15, 2017. The action to restore the diesel within 30 days | from September 7, 2017, to October 15, 2017. The action to restore the diesel within 30 days | ||
was not met on October 7, 2017, and Unit 2 was not in at least hot shutdown within the next | was not met on October 7, 2017, and Unit 2 was not in at least hot shutdown within the next | ||
Disposition: | hours and in cold shutdown within the following 24 hours. | ||
This violation is being treated as an NCV, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the | Disposition: This violation is being treated as an NCV, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the | ||
Enforcement Policy. | Enforcement Policy. | ||
Emergency Diesel Generator Combustion Air Overheating | Emergency Diesel Generator Combustion Air Overheating | ||
Cornerstone | Cornerstone | ||
Significance Cross-cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating System Green NCV | Significance | ||
Cross-cutting | |||
Aspect | |||
Report | |||
Section | |||
Mitigating System | |||
Green | |||
NCV | |||
05000352/2018001-02 | 05000352/2018001-02 | ||
Opened/Closed [P.3] - Resolution 71153 A self-revealed Green NCV of LGS Unit 1 TS 6.8.1 and TS 3.8.1.1 was identified when Exelon failed to properly maintain an operating procedure to maintain a fail-safe design | Opened/Closed | ||
feature for the EDGs which led to the | [P.3] - | ||
controlling how much emergency service water flows through this heat exchanger. | Resolution | ||
71153 | |||
On December 7, 2017, during surveillance testing of the | A self-revealed Green NCV of LGS Unit 1 TS 6.8.1 and TS 3.8.1.1 was identified when | ||
recognized that the combustion air temperature was abnormally high at 220 °F, with an expected band of 115 °F to 145 ° | Exelon failed to properly maintain an operating procedure to maintain a fail-safe design | ||
: [[contact::F. The | feature for the EDGs which led to the D12 EDG combustion air overheating and caused the | ||
and declared the | EDG to be inoperable for greater than its TS allowed outage time. | ||
Description: The EDG systems are safety related standby emergency power systems for | |||
LGS Units 1 and 2. Each EDG has an air cooler coolant heat exchanger that cools the water | |||
that cools the combustion air entering the engine. A three-way thermostatic control valve | |||
maintains combustion air temperature between 115 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) and 145 °F by | |||
controlling how much emergency service water flows through this heat exchanger. | |||
On December 7, 2017, during surveillance testing of the D12 EDG, Exelon personnel | |||
recognized that the combustion air temperature was abnormally high at 220 °F, with an | |||
expected band of 115 °F to 145 ° | |||
: [[contact::F. The D12 EDG had run unloaded for about two hours]], | |||
then fully loaded for about one hour when the condition was recognized. Exelon shutdown | |||
and declared the D12 EDG inoperable and entered TS Limiting Condition for Operation | |||
3.8.1.1. As part of troubleshooting, the temperature indicating controller (TIC) was removed, | 3.8.1.1. As part of troubleshooting, the temperature indicating controller (TIC) was removed, | ||
bench tested satisfactorily, re-installed, and recalibrated to a setpoint temperature of 130° | bench tested satisfactorily, re-installed, and recalibrated to a setpoint temperature of 130°F. | ||
Exelon found the cooling water controllers setpoint dial set at 200°F instead of at the required | |||
operable. | setpoint of 130° | ||
: [[contact::F. On December 12]], 2017, Exelon restored and declared the D12 EDG | |||
operable. | |||
Exelon performed a past operability review and root cause evaluation and determined that the | Exelon performed a past operability review and root cause evaluation and determined that the | ||
past functionality of the | past functionality of the D12 EDG was adversely impacted such that the EDG was | ||
inoperable since performance of the 24-hour endurance run that began on November 6, | |||
2017. Specifically, Exelon determined that on November 6, 2017, while performing a routine | |||
running check of engine operation, an equipment operator identified that the air cooler | running check of engine operation, an equipment operator identified that the air cooler | ||
temperature controller setpoint was not at 130°F with process temperatures off-scale low. | temperature controller setpoint was not at 130°F with process temperatures off-scale low. | ||
The low temperatures were previously identified with an existing IR, initiated on June 12, 2017. The operator adjusted the dial in order to adjust the temperature controller setpoint, in accordance with operating procedure S92.9.N, | The low temperatures were previously identified with an existing IR, initiated on | ||
Generators. | June 12, 2017. The operator adjusted the dial in order to adjust the temperature controller | ||
supply air to the temperature controller caused the TIC setpoint to be lower and fail to | setpoint, in accordance with operating procedure S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel | ||
respond. During the next engine run on December 7, 2017, the PCV delivered proper air pressure after three hours of runtime which resulted in the TIC setpoint being at 200 °F based | Generators. However, Exelon determined that an intermittent malfunction of the PCV in the | ||
supply air to the temperature controller caused the TIC setpoint to be lower and fail to | |||
respond. During the next engine run on December 7, 2017, the PCV delivered proper air | |||
pressure after three hours of runtime which resulted in the TIC setpoint being at 200 °F based | |||
on the as-left dial position that was established on November 6, 2017. | on the as-left dial position that was established on November 6, 2017. | ||
Exelon determined the root cause of the issue was the intermittent condition of the PCV that | Exelon determined the root cause of the issue was the intermittent condition of the PCV that | ||
caused intermittent combustion air low temperature operation. Exelon further determined the | caused intermittent combustion air low temperature operation. Exelon further determined the | ||
contributing cause of the issue was the operating procedure directing action which introduced | contributing cause of the issue was the operating procedure directing action which introduced | ||
a failure mechanism for the cooling system that was otherwise designed to fail safe (i.e. loss of supply air results in maximum cooling with no loss of diesel function). Finally, Exelon determined the most significant organizational contributor to the issue was the | a failure mechanism for the cooling system that was otherwise designed to fail safe (i.e. loss | ||
of supply air results in maximum cooling with no loss of diesel function). Finally, Exelon | |||
determined the most significant organizational contributor to the issue was the organizations | |||
failure to take effective corrective action to address the known low temperature condition | failure to take effective corrective action to address the known low temperature condition | ||
which was caused by the degraded pressure control valve. | which was caused by the degraded pressure control valve. | ||
Corrective Action(s): Exelon recalibrated and reinstalled the TIC, revised the operating | |||
Corrective Action(s): | procedure to ensure EDG functionality is maintained, and replaced the degraded PCV. | ||
Corrective Action Reference(s): | Corrective Action Reference(s): IR 4081882 | ||
Performance Deficiency: | Performance Assessment: | ||
operating procedure for the EDGs to maintain a fail-safe design feature was reasonably within | Performance Deficiency: The inspectors determined that the failure to properly maintain an | ||
circumstances given the previously identified intermittent combustion air low temperature operation and the failure of the TIC to respond to the dial adjustment that was directed by the | operating procedure for the EDGs to maintain a fail-safe design feature was reasonably within | ||
Exelons ability to foresee and correct and should have been prevented. Specifically, there | |||
was a reasonable ability to ensure the operating procedure was appropriate to the | |||
circumstances given the previously identified intermittent combustion air low temperature | |||
operation and the failure of the TIC to respond to the dial adjustment that was directed by the | |||
operating procedure. | operating procedure. | ||
Screening: | Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor | ||
because it adversely affected the equipment performance attribute of the mitigating systems | because it adversely affected the equipment performance attribute of the mitigating systems | ||
cornerstone to ensure the availability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences (i.e. core damage). Specifically, the inadequate procedure | cornerstone to ensure the availability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent | ||
resulted in the | undesirable consequences (i.e. core damage). Specifically, the inadequate procedure | ||
Significance: | resulted in the D12 EDG being inoperable from November 6 to December 12, 2017. | ||
Significance: The inspectors screened the significance of the finding using IMC 0609, | |||
Appendix A, Exhibit 2, and determined that this finding required a detailed risk evaluation | Appendix A, Exhibit 2, and determined that this finding required a detailed risk evaluation | ||
(DRE) since the inoperability exceeded the TS allowed outage time of 30 days. | (DRE) since the inoperability exceeded the TS allowed outage time of 30 days. | ||
A Region I SRA completed the DRE and estimated the increase in core damage frequency (CDF) associated with this performance deficiency to be 8.8E-8/yr, or of very low safety significance (Green). To perform the DRE, the SRA used the Systems Analysis Programs for Hands-On Evaluation (SAPHIRE), Revision 8.1.6, Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR) | A Region I SRA completed the DRE and estimated the increase in core damage frequency | ||
(CDF) associated with this performance deficiency to be 8.8E-8/yr, or of very low safety | |||
significance (Green). To perform the DRE, the SRA used the Systems Analysis Programs for | |||
Hands-On Evaluation (SAPHIRE), Revision 8.1.6, Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR) | |||
Model, version 8.50 for LGS Unit 1. This model was determined to require an update to | Model, version 8.50 for LGS Unit 1. This model was determined to require an update to | ||
appropriately modify logic and power dependencies associated with the low pressure injection | appropriately modify logic and power dependencies associated with the low pressure injection | ||
motor operated valve logic. These modifications were assessed and performed by an Idaho National Labs (INL) SPAR model contractor. A limited use updated SPAR model version was posted on the INL website and used by the SRA to run the conditional assessment assuming | motor operated valve logic. These modifications were assessed and performed by an Idaho | ||
a failure to run for the | National Labs (INL) SPAR model contractor. A limited use updated SPAR model version was | ||
intercooler air outlet temperatures. As noted in | posted on the INL website and used by the SRA to run the conditional assessment assuming | ||
these higher temperatures was related to blower degradation and engine degradation which was determined to challenge the operability of the EDG. | a failure to run for the D12 EDG. The failure was assumed given the unexpected high | ||
The SRA reviewed procedures E-1, | intercooler air outlet temperatures. As noted in Exelons review of the issue, the concern with | ||
Power, | these higher temperatures was related to blower degradation and engine degradation which | ||
Unit 2 safety busses to Unit 1 safety busses was 6E-2. This failure probability to take cross-tie actions was calculated through the use of a SPAR-H calculation conservatively assuming | was determined to challenge the operability of the EDG. | ||
barely adequate time exists, high stress, and low experience for the task. Basic event EPS-XHE-XM-DGXT, was therefore changed from TRUE to 6E-2. An exposure time of | The SRA reviewed procedures E-1, Loss of All AC Power, and E-10/20, Loss of Offsite | ||
Power, and determined that a best estimate value for the ability to cross-tie power from | |||
Unit 2 safety busses to Unit 1 safety busses was 6E-2. This failure probability to take cross- | |||
tie actions was calculated through the use of a SPAR-H calculation conservatively assuming | |||
barely adequate time exists, high stress, and low experience for the task. Basic event | |||
EPS-XHE-XM-DGXT, was therefore changed from TRUE to 6E-2. An exposure time of | |||
days was used based on the inoperable time determined for the D12 ED | |||
: [[contact::G. Additionally]], | : [[contact::G. Additionally]], | ||
no recovery credit was given for the high temperature condition. This was considered a | no recovery credit was given for the high temperature condition. This was considered a | ||
conservative assumption by the SRA given that procedure S92.9.N existed and if used during | conservative assumption by the SRA given that procedure S92.9.N existed and if used during | ||
a postulated event may have resulted in observation of the nonconforming condition and subsequent action to dial back the temperature setpoint. The SRA determined this action would have returned temperatures to the normal band. | a postulated event may have resulted in observation of the nonconforming condition and | ||
subsequent action to dial back the temperature setpoint. The SRA determined this action | |||
would have returned temperatures to the normal band. | |||
The dominant core damage sequence involved a weather related loss of offsite power, with | The dominant core damage sequence involved a weather related loss of offsite power, with | ||
failure of the | failure of the D12 EDG, common cause failure of the remaining Unit 1 EDGs, failure to cross- | ||
tie a Unit 2 EDG to a Unit 1 safety bus, failure to depressurize given the eventual loss of direct current (DC) power, and failure to recover either offsite power or an EDG within | tie a Unit 2 EDG to a Unit 1 safety bus, failure to depressurize given the eventual loss of | ||
direct current (DC) power, and failure to recover either offsite power or an EDG within | |||
hours. In accordance with IMC 0609 guidance a review of the external event risk or large | |||
early release frequency was not performed given the increase in internal event CDF was | early release frequency was not performed given the increase in internal event CDF was | ||
below the 1E-7/yr threshold and would not be expected to change the risk estimation. | below the 1E-7/yr threshold and would not be expected to change the risk estimation. | ||
Cross-Cutting Aspect: | Cross-Cutting Aspect: The inspectors determined that this finding has a cross-cutting aspect | ||
in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution, Resolution, because Exelon did not take | |||
effective corrective action when the intermittent low temperature condition caused by the | |||
degraded PCV was identified. Specifically, Exelon did not take appropriate interim corrective | degraded PCV was identified. Specifically, Exelon did not take appropriate interim corrective | ||
action to address the operating | action to address the operating procedures TIC adjustments in order to mitigate the issue | ||
while more fundamental causes were being addressed. [P.3] | while more fundamental causes were being addressed. [P.3] | ||
Enforcement: | Enforcement: | ||
Violation: | Violation: LGS Unit 1 TS 6.8.1, requires, in part, written procedures to be established, | ||
implemented, and maintained covering applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of | implemented, and maintained covering applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of | ||
Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978. Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, | Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978. Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, | ||
Appendix A, Section 1, requires procedures with instructions prepared as appropriate for the | Appendix A, Section 1, requires procedures with instructions prepared as appropriate for the | ||
operation of onsite emergency power sources (e.g. diesel generators). In addition, LGS Unit 1 TS 3.8.1.1 requires that an inoperable diesel generator be restored to an operable status within 30 days or the unit be in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours and in | operation of onsite emergency power sources (e.g. diesel generators). In addition, LGS | ||
Unit 1 TS 3.8.1.1 requires that an inoperable diesel generator be restored to an operable | |||
status within 30 days or the unit be in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours and in | |||
cold shutdown within the following 24 hours. Contrary to the above, Exelon did not properly | cold shutdown within the following 24 hours. Contrary to the above, Exelon did not properly | ||
maintain EDG operating procedure S92.9.N as appropriate for the operation of the EDGs. | maintain EDG operating procedure S92.9.N as appropriate for the operation of the EDGs. | ||
This caused the | This caused the D12 EDG to be inoperable from November 6, 2017, to December 12, 2017. | ||
following 24 hours. | The action to restore the diesel within 30 days was not met on December 6, 2017, and Unit 1 | ||
was not in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours and in cold shutdown within the | |||
following 24 hours. | |||
Disposition: This violation is being treated as an NCV, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the | |||
Enforcement Policy. | |||
EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS | |||
The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report. | |||
On April 12, 2018, the inspectors presented the quarterly resident inspector inspection | |||
results to Rick Libra, Site Vice-President, and other members of the Exelon staff. | |||
On April 12, 2018, the inspectors presented the quarterly resident inspector inspection results to Rick Libra, Site Vice-President, and other members of the Exelon staff. | |||
THIRD PARTY REVIEWS | THIRD PARTY REVIEWS | ||
Inspectors reviewed Institute on Nuclear Power Reactor reports that were issued during the | Inspectors reviewed Institute on Nuclear Power Reactor reports that were issued during the | ||
inspection period. | inspection period. | ||
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED | DOCUMENTS REVIEWED | ||
71111.01 | 71111.01 | ||
Procedures GP-7, Cold Weather Preparation and Operation, Revision 53 | Procedures | ||
SE-14, Snow, Revision 21 SE-9, Preparation for Severe Weather, Revision 45 | GP-7, Cold Weather Preparation and Operation, Revision 53 | ||
SE-14, Snow, Revision 21 | |||
SE-9, Preparation for Severe Weather, Revision 45 | |||
Condition Reports | Condition Reports | ||
4088765 | 4088765 | ||
71111.04Q | 71111.04Q | ||
Procedures 1S92.1.N (COL-2), Equipment Alignment for 1B Diesel Generator Operation, Revision 32 | Procedures | ||
2S55.1.A (COL), Equipment Alignment for Automatic Operation of HPCI System, Revision 19 GP-6.2, Shutdown Operations - Shutdown Cooling Tech Spec Actions, Revision 54 S51.6.A, Swapping RHR Pumps in RHR SDC Mode, Revision 18 | 1S92.1.N (COL-2), Equipment Alignment for 1B Diesel Generator Operation, Revision 32 | ||
S51.8.B, Shutdown Cooling/Reactor Coolant Recirculation Operation Start-Up and Shutdown, Revision 81 S55.1.A, Normal HPCI Line-Up for Automatic Operation, Revision 37 | 2S55.1.A (COL), Equipment Alignment for Automatic Operation of HPCI System, Revision 19 | ||
ST-6-095-905-2, Unit 2 Safeguard Battery Weekly Inspection, Revision 23 ST-6-095-911-2, Div I 125/250 Vdc 2A1D101/2A2D101 Safeguard Battery Quarterly Inspection, Revision 36 ST-6-095-915-2, Div I 125/250 Vdc 2A1D101/2A2D101 Safeguard Battery Monthly Inspection, Revision 15 | GP-6.2, Shutdown Operations - Shutdown Cooling Tech Spec Actions, Revision 54 | ||
S51.6.A, Swapping RHR Pumps in RHR SDC Mode, Revision 18 | |||
S51.8.B, Shutdown Cooling/Reactor Coolant Recirculation Operation Start-Up and Shutdown, | |||
Revision 81 | |||
S55.1.A, Normal HPCI Line-Up for Automatic Operation, Revision 37 | |||
ST-6-095-905-2, Unit 2 Safeguard Battery Weekly Inspection, Revision 23 | |||
ST-6-095-911-2, Div I 125/250 Vdc 2A1D101/2A2D101 Safeguard Battery Quarterly Inspection, | |||
Revision 36 | |||
ST-6-095-915-2, Div I 125/250 Vdc 2A1D101/2A2D101 Safeguard Battery Monthly Inspection, | |||
Revision 15 | |||
71111.05Q | 71111.05Q | ||
Procedures F-A-336, Pre-Fire Plan Common, 13.2kV Switchgear Room 336, Revision 15 | Procedures | ||
F-A-336, Pre-Fire Plan Common, 13.2kV Switchgear Room 336, Revision 15 | |||
F-A-425, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Unit 1, Class 1E Battery 5, Revision 13 | F-A-425, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Unit 1, Class 1E Battery 5, Revision 13 | ||
F-A-426, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Unit 2, Class 1E Battery 426 and 454, Revision 9 F-A-624, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Standby Gas Treatment Area Rooms 624 and 625, Revision 7 F-R-309, Unit 1, Safeguard Isolation Valve Area Room 309 (El 217), Revision 11 | F-A-426, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Unit 2, Class 1E Battery 426 and 454, Revision 9 | ||
F-A-624, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Standby Gas Treatment Area Rooms 624 and 625, Revision 7 | |||
F-R-309, Unit 1, Safeguard Isolation Valve Area Room 309 (El 217), Revision 11 | |||
Condition Reports | Condition Reports | ||
20254 | 20254 | ||
20452 | |||
71111.11Q | 71111.11Q | ||
Procedures GP-3, Normal Plant Shutdown, Revision 164 | Procedures | ||
GP-3, Normal Plant Shutdown, Revision 164 | |||
S91.6.B, Transferring House Loads to S/U Buses, Revision 19 | S91.6.B, Transferring House Loads to S/U Buses, Revision 19 | ||
71111.12Q | 71111.12Q | ||
Condition Reports | Condition Reports | ||
2632557 2655420 2663432 3986074 3988302 3991456 4003680 4011371 4076445 4106926 | 2632557 | ||
Miscellaneous Engage System Health Reports | 2655420 | ||
2663432 | |||
3986074 | |||
3988302 | |||
3991456 | |||
4003680 | |||
4011371 | |||
4076445 | |||
4106926 | |||
Miscellaneous | |||
Engage System Health Reports | |||
71111.13 | 71111.13 | ||
Procedures ER-AA-600-1042, On-Line Risk Management, Revision 11 OP-LG-108-117-1000, Limerick Protected Equipment Program, Revision 6 WC-AA-101-1006, On-Line Risk Management and Assessment, Revision 2 | Procedures | ||
ER-AA-600-1042, On-Line Risk Management, Revision 11 | |||
OP-LG-108-117-1000, Limerick Protected Equipment Program, Revision 6 | |||
WC-AA-101-1006, On-Line Risk Management and Assessment, Revision 2 | |||
Condition Reports | Condition Reports | ||
4102016 4102082 | 4102016 | ||
Miscellaneous E2 Work Schedule for Week of 2/25/18 | 4102082 | ||
Miscellaneous | |||
E2 Work Schedule for Week of 2/25/18 | |||
Protected Equipment Scheme on 2/27/18 | Protected Equipment Scheme on 2/27/18 | ||
Protected Equipment Scheme on 3/1/18 Protected Equipment Scheme on 3/27/18 and 3/28/18 | Protected Equipment Scheme on 3/1/18 | ||
Protected Equipment Scheme on 3/27/18 and 3/28/18 | |||
71111.15 | 71111.15 | ||
Procedures OP-AA-102-103, Operator Work-Around Program, Revision 4 OP-AA-102-106, Operator Response Time Program, Revision 4 ON-115, Loss of Control Enclosure Cooling, Revision 25 | Procedures | ||
OP-AA-102-103, Operator Work-Around Program, Revision 4 | |||
OP-AA-102-106, Operator Response Time Program, Revision 4 | |||
ON-115, Loss of Control Enclosure Cooling, Revision 25 | |||
Condition Reports | Condition Reports | ||
4082004 4088765 4089921 4099141 4099223 4100277 4100294 4100598 4117844 | 4082004 | ||
4088765 | |||
4089921 | |||
4099141 | |||
4099223 | |||
4100277 | |||
4100294 | |||
4100598 | |||
4117844 | |||
Work Order | Work Order | ||
4308130 | 4308130 | ||
Miscellaneous L-S-29, Chilled Water System, Revision 14 | Miscellaneous | ||
L-S-29, Chilled Water System, Revision 14 | |||
71111.18 | 71111.18 | ||
Procedures CC-AA-10, Configuration Control Process, Revision 9 | Procedures | ||
CC-AA-10, Configuration Control Process, Revision 9 | |||
CC-AA-101, Engineering Change Requests, Revision 5 | CC-AA-101, Engineering Change Requests, Revision 5 | ||
IP-ENG-001, Standard Design Process, Revision 0 | IP-ENG-001, Standard Design Process, Revision 0 | ||
ST-6-076-310-2, SGTS Reactor Enclosure Secondary Containment Integrity Test, Revision 21 | ST-6-076-310-2, SGTS Reactor Enclosure Secondary Containment Integrity Test, Revision 21 | ||
Condition Reports | |||
Condition Reports 4085733 4105709 | 4085733 | ||
4105709 | |||
Work Orders 4703263 | 21117 | ||
Work Orders | |||
4703263 | |||
27391 | |||
4733863 | |||
4738484 | |||
4750273 | |||
Miscellaneous | |||
EC 622647, Inflatable Seal - Secondary Containment, Revision 2 | |||
ECR 433952 | |||
71111.19 | 71111.19 | ||
Procedures M-095-005, Replacement of Station Battery Cells, Revision 10 | Procedures | ||
M-095-005, Replacement of Station Battery Cells, Revision 10 | |||
PES-S-004, Sampling Plan, Revision 2 | PES-S-004, Sampling Plan, Revision 2 | ||
ST-2-049-100-2, RCIC Logic System Functional: Simulated Automatic Actuation Test, Revision | ST-2-049-100-2, RCIC Logic System Functional: Simulated Automatic Actuation Test, Revision | ||
ST-2-049-101-2, RCIC Logic System Functional: Isolation Logic Test, Revision 16 ST-6-092-312-1, D12 Diesel Generator Slow Start Operability Test Run, Revision 103 | ST-2-049-101-2, RCIC Logic System Functional: Isolation Logic Test, Revision 16 | ||
ST-6-092-312-1, D12 Diesel Generator Slow Start Operability Test Run, Revision 103 | |||
Condition Reports | Condition Reports | ||
0379493 0381794 4081625 4094240 4103817 4104251 | 0379493 | ||
0381794 | |||
4081625 | |||
4094240 | |||
4103817 | |||
4104251 | |||
Work Orders | Work Orders | ||
1382270 | 1382270 | ||
Miscellaneous CGIFU01, EPRI CGI Joint Utility Task Group Commercial Grade Item Evaluation for UL 198E | 243506 | ||
Inspection Report 0101903 LIM-72331, Failure Analysis of Fuses, 12/27/17 Listed Fuses, 7/9/91 | 255083 | ||
4595702 | |||
71111.22 | 4699475 | ||
Miscellaneous | |||
CGIFU01, EPRI CGI Joint Utility Task Group Commercial Grade Item Evaluation for UL 198E | |||
Inspection Report 0101903 | |||
LIM-72331, Failure Analysis of Fuses, 12/27/17 | |||
Listed Fuses, 7/9/91 | |||
71111.22 | |||
IST | |||
Procedures | |||
ST-6-052-231-1, A Loop Core Spray Pump, Valve, and Flow Test, Revision 83 | |||
ST-6-052-232-1, B Loop Core Spray Pump, Valve, and Flow Test, Revision 74 | ST-6-052-232-1, B Loop Core Spray Pump, Valve, and Flow Test, Revision 74 | ||
Routine | Routine | ||
ST-2-074-642-1, Source Range and Intermediate Range Neutron Monitor Pre-Shutdown Functional Test, Revision 8 ST-6-092-113-2, D23 Diesel Generator 24 Hour Endurance Test, Revision 43 | Procedures | ||
RT-6-051-320-1, B RHR Remote Operability Test, Revision 7 | |||
Condition Reports 4116219 | ST-2-074-642-1, Source Range and Intermediate Range Neutron Monitor Pre-Shutdown | ||
Functional Test, Revision 8 | |||
ST-6-092-113-2, D23 Diesel Generator 24 Hour Endurance Test, Revision 43 | |||
Condition Reports | |||
4116219 | |||
Containment Isolation Valve | Containment Isolation Valve | ||
Procedures ST-4-LLR-031-1, Main Steam Line | Procedures | ||
ST-4-LLR-041-1, Main Steam Line | ST-4-LLR-031-1, Main Steam Line A, Revision 13 | ||
ST-4-LLR-041-1, Main Steam Line B, Revision 12 | |||
Work Orders | Work Orders | ||
4309668 4310968 | 4309668 | ||
4310968 | |||
71124.08 | 71124.08 | ||
Procedures RP-AA-600, Radioactive Material/Waste Shipments, Revision 16 | Procedures | ||
RP-AA-600-1001, Exclusive Use and | RP-AA-600, Radioactive Material/Waste Shipments, Revision 16 | ||
RP-AA-600-1001, Exclusive Use and Emergency Response Information, Revision 9 | |||
Facility (DCF), Revision 10 RP-AA-600-1004, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Energy | RP-AA-600-1002, Highway Route Controlled Quantity/Advanced Notification for | ||
RP-AA-600-1006, Shipment of Category 1 Quantities of Radioactive Material or Waste (Category 1 RAMQC), Revision 11 RP-AA-600-1007, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Energy | Radioactive/Waste Shipments, Revision 6 | ||
RP-AA-600-1003, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Barnwell and the Defense Consolidation | |||
Facility (DCF), Revision 10 | |||
RP-AA-600-1004, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Energy Solutions Clive Utah Disposal Site | |||
Containerized Waste Facility, Revision 13 | |||
RP-AA-600-1005, Radioactive Material and Non Disposal Site Waste Shipments, Rev 19 | |||
RP-AA-600-1006, Shipment of Category 1 Quantities of Radioactive Material or Waste | |||
(Category 1 RAMQC), Revision 11 | |||
RP-AA-600-1007, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Energy Solutions Clive Utah Disposal | |||
Facility Bulk Waste Facility (BWF), Revision 8 | |||
RP-AA-600-1008, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Waste Control Specialists (WCS) Disposal | |||
Facility, Revision 5 | |||
RP-AA-600-1009, Shipment of Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive Material or Waste | |||
(Category 2 RAMQC), Revision 2 | |||
RP-AA-600-1010, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Creating Containers, Samples, | |||
Waste Streams and Waste Types, Revision 2 | |||
RP-AA-600-1011, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Gross Gamma Characterization and | |||
Generation of Shipping Paperwork, Revision 4 | |||
RP-AA-600-1012, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Direct Sample Characterization and | |||
Generation of Shipping Paperwork, Revision 2 | |||
RP-AA-600-1014, Use and Operation of WMG Software Filter Module, Revision 2 | |||
RP-AA-600-1015, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Outage Service Module, Revision 3 | RP-AA-600-1015, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Outage Service Module, Revision 3 | ||
RP-AA-600-1016, Use and Operation of the WMG Software for Characterization of Miscellaneous Items, Revision 0 RP-AA-601, Surveying Radioactive Material Shipments, Revision 20 RP-AA-602, Packaging of Radioactive Material Shipments, Revision 20 RP-AA-602-1001, Packaging of Radioactive Material/Waste Shipments, Revision 17 | RP-AA-600-1016, Use and Operation of the WMG Software for Characterization of | ||
RP-AA-602-1002, Loading Dry Active Waste and Other Waste Forms for Energy | Miscellaneous Items, Revision 0 | ||
RP-AA-601, Surveying Radioactive Material Shipments, Revision 20 | |||
RP-AA-602, Packaging of Radioactive Material Shipments, Revision 20 | |||
RP-AA-602-1001, Packaging of Radioactive Material/Waste Shipments, Revision 17 | |||
RP-AA-602-1002, Loading Dry Active Waste and Other Waste Forms for Energy Solutions | |||
Waste Acceptance Guide (WAG-501), Revision 0 | |||
RP-AA-602-1003, Radioactive Materials/Waste Shipments Transported Via Rail, Revision 1 | |||
RP-AA-603, Inspection and Loading of Radioactive Material Shipments, Rev 10 | |||
RP-AA-605, 10 CFR 61 Program, Revision 7 | |||
RP-AA-607, Radioactive Material Shipped in Accordance With IATA requirements, Revision 5 | RP-AA-607, Radioactive Material Shipped in Accordance With IATA requirements, Revision 5 | ||
RW-AA-100, Process Control Program for Radioactive Wastes, Revision 12 | RW-AA-100, Process Control Program for Radioactive Wastes, Revision 12 | ||
RW-AA-605, 10 CFR 61 Program, Revision 7 | RW-AA-605, 10 CFR 61 Program, Revision 7 | ||
Quality Assurance NOSA-LIM-16-04, Chemistry, Radwaste, Effluent and Environmental Monitoring Audit Report EnergySolutions Internal Audit CORP-16-004, Clive Facility NUPIC 24365, EnergySolutions | Quality Assurance | ||
NOSA-LIM-16-04, Chemistry, Radwaste, Effluent and Environmental Monitoring Audit Report | |||
EnergySolutions Internal Audit CORP-16-004, Clive Facility | |||
NUPIC 24365, EnergySolutions | |||
NUPIC 24515, Waste Control Specialists, LLC | NUPIC 24515, Waste Control Specialists, LLC | ||
CFR Part 61 Scaling Factors | |||
Waste Sludge Tank; Deep Bed; Dry Active Waste; Fuel Floor; Reactor Water Clean-Up | |||
Condition Reports | Condition Reports | ||
3955208 | 3955208 | ||
28930 | 28930 | ||
4085448 4092536 4092545 | 4085448 | ||
4092536 | |||
4092545 | |||
4092549 | 4092549 | ||
4092556 | 4092556 | ||
4092578 | 4092578 | ||
Training | |||
RC-102, Use of WMG Programs and Regulatory Interface | |||
RC-300, Transportation of Radioactive Material by Air | RC-300, Transportation of Radioactive Material by Air | ||
Shipments MW-16-010; MW-16-045; MW-16-059; MW-17-006; MW-17-031 | Shipments | ||
MW-16-010; MW-16-045; MW-16-059; MW-17-006; MW-17-031 | |||
71151 | 71151 | ||
Procedures LS-AA-2200, Mitigating System Performance Index Data Acquisition and Reporting, Revision 5 | Procedures | ||
NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7 | LS-AA-2200, Mitigating System Performance Index Data Acquisition and Reporting, Revision 5 | ||
NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7 | |||
Miscellaneous | |||
Operation Narrative Logs Power History Graphs | MSPI Data | ||
Operation Narrative Logs | |||
Power History Graphs | |||
71153 | 71153 | ||
Procedures ARC-BOP-1BC514 C1, Lube Oil Temp High, Revision 1 | Procedures | ||
ARC-BOP-1BC514 C1, Lube Oil Temp High, Revision 1 | |||
ARC-BOP-2BC514 B2, | ARC-BOP-2BC514 B2, | ||
: [[contact::J.W. Temp High]], Revision 1 | : [[contact::J.W. Temp High]], Revision 1 | ||
E-1, Loss of All AC Power (Station Blackout), Revision 51 | E-1, Loss of All AC Power (Station Blackout), Revision 51 | ||
E-1, Loss of All AC Power (Station Blackout), Revision 51 | E-1, Loss of All AC Power (Station Blackout), Revision 51 | ||
E-10/20, Loss of Offsite Power, Revision 56 E-10/20, Loss of Offsite Power, Revision 56 MA-AA-716-017, Station Rework Reduction Program, Revision 7 | E-10/20, Loss of Offsite Power, Revision 56 | ||
E-10/20, Loss of Offsite Power, Revision 56 | |||
MA-AA-716-017, Station Rework Reduction Program, Revision 7 | |||
S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel Generators, Revision 73 | S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel Generators, Revision 73 | ||
S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel Generators, Revision 74 | S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel Generators, Revision 74 | ||
ST-2-020-401-1, Electrical Power Systems 1BG501 Diesel Generator Critical and Non-Critical Instruments Calibration / Functional Test, Revision 31 ST-6-092-112-1, D12 Diesel Generator 24 Hour Endurance Test, Revision 39 ST-6-092-312-1, D12 Diesel Generator Slow Start Operability Test Run, Revision 103 | ST-2-020-401-1, Electrical Power Systems 1BG501 Diesel Generator Critical and Non-Critical | ||
Instruments Calibration / Functional Test, Revision 31 | |||
ST-6-092-112-1, D12 Diesel Generator 24 Hour Endurance Test, Revision 39 | |||
ST-6-092-312-1, D12 Diesel Generator Slow Start Operability Test Run, Revision 103 | |||
ST-6-092-316-1, D12 Diesel Generator Fast Start Operability Test Run, Revision 54 | ST-6-092-316-1, D12 Diesel Generator Fast Start Operability Test Run, Revision 54 | ||
ST-6-092-362-2, D22 Diesel Generator Operability Verification, Revision 40 | ST-6-092-362-2, D22 Diesel Generator Operability Verification, Revision 40 | ||
ST-6-092-362-2, D22 Diesel Generator Operability Verification, Revision 40 | ST-6-092-362-2, D22 Diesel Generator Operability Verification, Revision 40 | ||
Condition Reports 1108417 | Condition Reports | ||
4069001 4070641 4073004 4081882 4082219 | 1108417 | ||
22131 | |||
24515 | |||
21268 | |||
4049989 | |||
4062096 | |||
4069001 | |||
4070641 | |||
4073004 | |||
4081882 | |||
4082219 | |||
Work Orders | Work Orders | ||
2075815 2079589 | 2075815 | ||
4650858 4652385 4652410 4652412 4663824 4672813 | 2079589 | ||
4686262 4697246 | 292476 | ||
Miscellaneous ANSI/ASME B1.20.1, Pipe Threads, General Purpose (Inch), 1983 | 4318057 | ||
LIM-64785, Failure Analysis of a Threaded Pipe Nipple from Limerick Station, 12/5/2017 L-S-07, Diesel Generator and Auxiliary Systems, Revision 15 L-S-07, Diesel Generator and Auxiliary Systems, Revision 15 | 4642785 | ||
4650838 | |||
4650858 | |||
4652385 | |||
4652410 | |||
4652412 | |||
4663824 | |||
4672813 | |||
4686262 | |||
4697246 | |||
Miscellaneous | |||
ANSI/ASME B1.20.1, Pipe Threads, General Purpose (Inch), 1983 | |||
LIM-64785, Failure Analysis of a Threaded Pipe Nipple from Limerick Station, 12/5/2017 | |||
L-S-07, Diesel Generator and Auxiliary Systems, Revision 15 | |||
L-S-07, Diesel Generator and Auxiliary Systems, Revision 15 | |||
PES-S-006, Code Reconciliation, Revision 6 | PES-S-006, Code Reconciliation, Revision 6 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:05, 5 January 2025
| ML18131A015 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick |
| Issue date: | 05/11/2018 |
| From: | James Krafty Reactor Projects Region 1 Branch 4 |
| To: | Bryan Hanson Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
| References | |
| IR 2018001 | |
| Download: ML18131A015 (22) | |
Text
May 11, 2018
SUBJECT:
LIMERICK GENERATING STATION - INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000352/2018001 AND 05000353/2018001
Dear Mr. Hanson:
On March 31, 2018, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at Limerick Generating Station (LGS), Units 1 and 2. On April 12, 2018, the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Rick Libra, Site Vice-President, and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report.
NRC inspectors documented two findings of very low safety significance (Green) in this report.
These findings involved violations of NRC requirements. The NRC is treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the Enforcement Policy.
If you contest the violations or significance of these NCVs, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC Resident Inspector at LGS. In addition, if you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC, 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I, and the NRC Resident Inspector at LGS.
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the NRCs Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
Sincerely,
/RA/
James A. Krafty, Acting Chief Reactor Projects Branch 4 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Numbers: 50-352 and 50-353 License Numbers: NPF-39 and NPF-85
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000352/2018001 and 05000353/2018001
Inspection Report
Docket Numbers:
50-352 and 50-353
License Numbers:
Report Numbers:
05000352/2018001 and 05000353/2018001
Enterprise Identifier:
I-2018-001-0071
Licensee:
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
Facility:
Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 & 2
Location:
Sanatoga, PA 19464
Inspection Dates:
January 1, 2018 through March 31, 2018
Inspectors:
S. Rutenkroger, PhD, Senior Resident Inspector
M. Fannon, Resident Inspector
H. Anagnostopoulos, Senior Health Physicist
J. Furia, Senior Health Physicist
Approved By:
J. Krafty, Acting Chief
Reactor Projects Branch 4
Division of Reactor Projects
SUMMARY
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring Exelons performance at
Limerick Generating Station Units 1 and 2 by conducting the baseline inspections described in this report in accordance with the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process is the NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors.
Refer to https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more information. NRC identified and self-revealed findings, violations, and additional items are summarized in the table below.
List of Findings and Violations
Failure of Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Pipe Nipple Fitting Cornerstone Significance Cross-cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating Systems Green NCV 05000353/2018001-01 Opened/Closed
[P.1] -
Identification 71153 A self-revealed Green non-cited violation (NCV) of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI,
Corrective Action, and LGS Unit 2 technical specification (TS) 3.8.1.1 was identified when Exelon failed to correct a degraded lube oil pipe nipple fitting on the D22 emergency diesel generator (EDG) when maintenance was performed to address leakage which caused inoperability of the EDG for greater than its TS allowed outage time.
Emergency Diesel Generator Combustion Air Overheating Cornerstone Significance Cross-cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating Systems Green NCV 05000352/2018001-02 Opened/Closed
[P.3] -
Resolution 71153 A self-revealed Green NCV of LGS Unit 1 TS 6.8.1 and TS 3.8.1.1 was identified when Exelon failed to properly maintain an operating procedure to maintain a fail-safe design feature for the EDGs which led to the D12 EDG combustion air overheating and caused the EDG to be inoperable for greater than its TS allowed outage time.
Additional Tracking Items
Type Issue number Title Report Section Status LER 05000353/2017-008-00 05000353/2017-008-01 EDG Inoperable for Greater Than 30 Days Resulting in a Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications 71153 Closed LER 05000352/2018-001-00 D12 EDG Inoperable for Greater than 30 Days Resulting in a Condition Prohibited by TS 71153 Closed
PLANT STATUS
Unit 1 began the inspection period at rated thermal power. On March 25 to 26, 2018, the unit was down powered and shutdown for a planned refueling outage. The unit remained shutdown for the refueling outage for the remainder of the inspection period.
Unit 2 began the inspection period at rated thermal power. On March 17, 2018, the unit was down powered to 64 percent to repair a main condenser tube leak. The unit was returned to rated thermal power the same day and remained at or near rated thermal power for the remainder of the inspection period.
INSPECTION SCOPES
Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors performed plant status activities described in IMC 2515 Appendix D, Plant Status and conducted routine reviews using IP 71152, Problem Identification and Resolution. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess Exelons performance and compliance with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards.
REACTOR SAFETY
71111.01 - Adverse Weather Protection
Impending Severe Weather (2 samples)
- (1) The inspectors evaluated readiness for impending adverse weather conditions for the onset of winter weather, including high winds, on January 5, 2018.
- (2) The inspectors evaluated readiness for impending adverse weather conditions for the onset of winter weather, including high winds, on March 2, 2018.
71111.04 - Equipment Alignment
Partial Walkdown (5 samples)
The inspectors evaluated system configurations during partial walkdowns of the following systems/trains:
- (1) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection on January 16 and 17, 2018
- (2) Unit 1 D11 and D13 emergency diesel generators (EDGs) on February 5, 2018
- (3) Unit 2 2A batteries and chargers during 2BD101 battery planned maintenance on February 5 through 9, 2018
- (4) Unit 1 B residual heat removal subsystem in shutdown cooling during the A emergency core cooling subsystem maintenance window on March 27, 2018
- (5) Unit 1 D12 EDG during the division 1 and 3 direct current bus maintenance window on March 28, 2018
71111.05 - Fire Protection
Quarterly Inspection (5 samples)
The inspectors evaluated fire protection program implementation in the following selected areas:
- (1) Fire area 2, Unit common 13.2kV switchgear room, elevation 217, on January 8, 2018
- (2) Fire area 8, Unit 1 class 1E battery room, elevation 239, on January 23, 2018
- (3) Fire area 10, Unit 2 class 1E battery rooms, elevation 239, on February 5, 2018
- (4) Fire area 28, Unit common standby gas treatment area rooms, elevation 332, on February 27, 201
- (5) Fire area 43, Unit 1 safeguard isolation valve area room 309, elevation 217, on March 28, 2018
71111.11 - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance
Operator Requalification (1 sample)
The inspectors observed and evaluated licensed operator simulator training scenarios on February 20, 2018.
Operator Performance (1 sample)
The inspectors observed the downpower and normal plant shutdown of Unit 1 for a planned refueling outage on March 25 and 26, 2018
71111.12 - Maintenance Effectiveness
Routine Maintenance Effectiveness (2 samples)
The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of routine maintenance activities associated with the following equipment and/or safety significant functions:
- (1) Unit 1 reactor manual control system
- (2) Unit 2 reactor manual control system
71111.13 - Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control (6 samples)
The inspectors evaluated the risk assessments for the following planned and emergent work activities:
- (1) Unit 2 reactor core isolation cooling relay replacements on January 16 and 17, 2018
- (2) Unit common B control room emergency fresh air system testing on February 7, 2018
- (3) Unit 2 A residual heat removal maintenance on February 26 and 27, 2018
- (4) Unit common A standby gas treatment system maintenance on February 27, 2018
- (5) Unit common A emergency service water, A standby gas treatment system, and Unit 2 A reactor enclosure recirculation system maintenance on March 1, 2018
- (6) Unit 1 A emergency core cooling system maintenance during reduced core inventory in the refueling outage on March 27 and 28, 2018
71111.15 - Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments (6 samples)
The inspectors evaluated the following operability determinations and functionality assessments:
- (1) Unit 2, D21 EDG room low temperature alarm on December 31, 2017
- (2) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection condensate pump discharge check valve failure on January 25, 2018
- (3) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection vacuum breaker check valve oversized disc on January 31, 2018
- (4) Unit common A emergency service water pump motor step voltage test leakage current on January 31, 2018
- (5) Unit 2 D21 EDG multiple battery ground alarms while raising speed during the slow start surveillance test on February 2, 2018
- (6) Unit common, B control room air supply controller not properly maintaining room temperature on February 4, 2018
71111.18 - Plant Modifications (2 samples)
The inspectors evaluated the following temporary or permanent modifications:
- (1) Engineering change package 622647 - Inflatable Seal - Secondary Containment
- (2) Engineering change request 433952, D23 Repair of the Blower Inspection Cover Bolt Holes Using Stainless Steel Heli-Coil Thread Inserts
71111.19 - Post Maintenance Testing (6 samples)
The inspectors evaluated post maintenance testing for the following maintenance/repair activities:
- (1) Unit 2 D24 EDG fuse replacement following an intermittent issue in the automatic start logic circuit on December 6, 2017
- (2) Unit 2 reactor core isolation cooling relay replacements on January 16 and 17, 2018
- (3) Unit 1 D12 EDG air cooler temperature indicator controller pressure control valve (PCV)replacement on February 5, 2018
- (4) Unit 2 B2 battery cell replacements on February 5 and 6, 2018
- (5) Unit 2 B2 battery charger current adjustment on February 15, 2018
- (6) Unit 2 D24 EDG heating, ventilation, and cooling fan controller replacement on February 22, 2018
71111.20 - Refueling and Other Outage Activities
The inspectors evaluated the Unit 1 refueling outage 1R17 from March 26, 2018, through the end of the inspection period. The following portions of the inspection procedure were not performed during this period.
- (1) Fatigue Management
- (2) Startup
71111.22 - Surveillance Testing
The inspectors evaluated the following surveillance tests:
Routine
- (1) ST-6-092-113-2, D23 EDG 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> endurance run on January 18 and 19, 2018
- (2) RT-6-051-320-1, Unit 1 B residual heat removal remote operation test on February 7, 2018
- (3) ST-2-074-642-1, Unit 1 source range and intermediate range neutron monitors pre-shutdown testing on March 18, 2018
In-service (2 samples)
- (1) ST-6-052-231-1, Unit 1 A core spray pump, valve, and flow test on January 4, 2018
- (2) ST-6-052-232-1, Unit 1 B core spray pump, valve, and flow test on March 10, 2018
Containment Isolation Valve (2 samples)
- (1) ST-4-LLR-031-1, Unit 1 main steam line A inboard and outboard isolation valves leakage rate testing on March 29, 2018
- (2) ST-4-LLR-041-1, Unit 1 main steam line B inboard and outboard isolation valves leakage rate testing on March 29,
RADIATION SAFETY
71124.02 - Occupational As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) Planning and Controls
Radiological Work Planning (1 sample)
The inspectors evaluated Exelons radiological work planning by reviewing the following activities:
- (1) ALARA Plan 2017-101
- (2) ALARA Plan 2017-050
- (3) ALARA Plan 2017-052
Verification of Dose Estimates and Exposure Tracking Systems (1 sample)
The inspectors evaluated dose estimates and exposure tracking.
71124.08 - Radioactive Solid Waste Processing and Radioactive Material Handling, Storage,
and Transportation
Radioactive Material Storage
The inspectors observed radioactive waste container storage areas and verified the postings and controls and that Exelon had established a process for monitoring the impact of long-term storage of the waste.
Radioactive Waste System Walkdown (1 sample)
The inspectors walked down the following:
Accessible portions of liquid and solid radioactive waste processing systems to verify current system alignment and material condition
Abandoned in place radioactive waste processing equipment to review the controls in place to ensure protection of personnel
Changes made to the radioactive waste processing systems since the last inspection
Processes for mixing and transferring radioactive waste resin and/or sludge discharges into shipping/disposal containers
Current methods and procedures for dewatering waste
Waste Characterization and Classification (1 sample)
The inspectors identified radioactive waste streams and reviewed radiochemical sample analysis results to support radioactive waste characterization. The inspectors reviewed the use of scaling factors and calculations to account for difficult-to-measure radionuclides.
Shipment Preparation (1 sample)
The inspectors reviewed the records of shipment packaging, surveying, labeling, marking, placarding, vehicle checks, emergency instructions, disposal manifest, shipping papers provided to the driver, and Exelons verification of shipment readiness.
Shipping Records (1 sample)
The inspectors reviewed selected non-excepted package shipment records.
OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE
71151 - Performance Indicator Verification
The inspectors verified Exelons performance indicator submittals listed below for the period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.
- (1) Unit 1 and Unit 2 Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours
- (2) Unit 1 and Unit 2 High Pressure Injection Systems
- (3) Unit 1 and Unit 2 Heat Removal Systems
71153 - Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion Licensee Event Reports (LER)
The inspectors evaluated the following licensee event reports which can be accessed at https://lersearch.inl.gov/LERSearchCriteria.aspx:
- (1) LER 05000353/2017-008-00 and 05000353/2017-008-01, EDG Inoperable for Greater Than 30 Days Resulting in a Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications, on December 11, 2017, and February 22, 2018. The review for this event is documented in the inspection results section.
- (2) LER 05000352/2018-001-00, D12 EDG Inoperable for Greater than 30 Days Resulting in a Condition Prohibited by TS, on February 5, 2018. The review for this event is documented in the inspection results section.
INSPECTION RESULTS
Failure of Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Pipe Nipple Fitting Cornerstone Significance Cross-cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating Systems Green NCV 05000353/2018001-01 Opened/Closed
[P.1] -
Identification 71153 A self-revealed Green non-cited violation (NCV) of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, and LGS Unit 2 technical specification (TS) 3.8.1.1 was identified when Exelon failed to correct a degraded lube oil pipe nipple fitting on the D22 EDG when maintenance was performed to address leakage which caused inoperability of the EDG for greater than its TS allowed outage time.
Description:
The EDG systems are safety related standby emergency power systems for LGS Units 1 and 2 consisting of four diesel generator sets per unit. Each EDG has a lube oil system that cools the diesel engine, lubricates the engine wear surfaces (moving parts), and captures friction wear products. On October 11, 2017, during testing of the D22 EDG, Exelon personnel identified a lube oil leak from a 0.5 inch tapered thread pipe nipple fitting between the lube oil filter and the lube oil filter vent valve. The personnel estimated the leak to be approximately 0.03125 gallons per minute (gpm) (about one-half cup per minute), and Exelon declared the EDG inoperable.
Exelon performed an equipment corrective action program evaluation and identified that the same fitting was found to be leaking and/or weeping on August 31, 2010, and October 3, 2012. After identifying leakage on August 31, 2010, Exelon removed, cleaned, visually inspected, and reinstalled the fitting with thread sealant on November 29, 2011. After the second identification of leakage on October 3, 2012, Exelon performed a similar repair for a second time on August 29, 2013. Exelon planned a similar repair when the fitting leaked for a third time on September 7, 2017. The repair was initially planned for October 6, 2017, but was subsequently rescheduled for November 3, 2017. Exelon identified three through-wall cracks and irregular threads in the fitting and concluded the apparent cause of the failure on October 11, 2017, was age related cyclic fatigue induced by diesel engine vibration. Exelon also determined that the repairs made in 2011 and 2013 contributed to the stresses and crack development and propagation rate based on galling of the threads, wrench marks on the exterior of the fitting, and deeper thread engagement.
The inspectors determined that a rework investigation was required by Exelon procedure MA-AA-716-017, Station Rework Reduction Program, when leakage was identified the second time. Exelon was unable to find evidence that a rework investigation was performed or provide a basis for not performing one. The inspectors concluded a rework investigation would have reasonably provided additional focus and oversight on the subsequent maintenance performed on August 29, 2013. The inspectors determined that additional focus would have provided an opportunity to identify the galled threads on the pipe nipple, the high installation torque required to insert the nipple, and the deeper thread engagement of the nipple following the repair (the nipple was essentially fully inserted into the housing). The fittings condition indicated additional tightening of at least two additional threads beyond original installation which is outside the tolerances of ASME B1.20.1, Pipe Threads, General Purpose (Inch). Based on these conditions, the inspectors determined that Exelon had a reasonable opportunity to foresee and correct the degraded fitting as required by Exelon procedure PI-AA-125, Corrective Action Program (CAP) Procedure, when the second repair was performed.
The inspectors also noted that when maintenance personnel fabricated a replacement fitting after the October 11, 2017, failure, the new fitting leaked during post-maintenance testing.
Maintenance personnel responded by tightening the fitting further, and the fitting leaked again during post-maintenance testing. Exelon then removed the fitting, determined the threads of the new fitting were not satisfactory, that personnel had not verified the threads were properly cut, and fabricated a second new fitting. Although the performance deficiency occurred on August 29, 2013, the inspectors considered the above and determined the applicable cross-cutting aspect of not recognizing deviations from ASME standards, training, and skill of the craft when taking action to address leakage was indicative of current performance.
Corrective Action(s): Exelon replaced the fitting and restored operability of the EDG on October 15, 2017, revised equipment data to require replacement of a pipe nipple fitting instead of reusing if a future leak is identified, and initiated actions to replace similar fittings for extent of condition.
Corrective Action Reference(s): Issue Report (IR) 4070641
Performance Assessment:
Performance Deficiency: The inspectors determined that the failure to correct a degraded lube oil pipe nipple fitting on the D22 EDG when maintenance was performed to address leakage was reasonably within Exelons ability to foresee and correct and should have been prevented.
Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor because it adversely affected the equipment performance attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone to ensure the availability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences (i.e. core damage). Specifically, the issue caused the D22 EDG to be inoperable from September 7 to October 15, 2017.
Significance: The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using IMC 0609, Appendix A, Exhibit 2, and determined that this finding was of very low safety significance (Green). Specifically, the inspectors, in consultation with a Region I senior reactor analyst (SRA), determined that the condition did not represent an actual loss of the D22 EDG probabilistic risk assessment safety function, i.e. the capability to provide power for up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. The lube oil storage tank contained over 216 gallons during the period.
The lube oil consumption rate was less than 0.05 gpm. The leak rate was consistent at about 0.03125 gpm. Therefore, at a minimum the lube oil storage tank contained sufficient oil to make up to the D22 EDG oil reservoir for over 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> of EDG operation.
Cross-Cutting Aspect: The inspectors determined that this finding has a cross-cutting aspect in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution, Identification, because Exelon personnel did not recognize deviations from standards, training, and skill of the craft when addressing leakage. [P.1]
Enforcement:
Violation: 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, requires, in part, that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as deficiencies, defective material, and non-conformances are promptly identified and corrected.
LGS Unit 2 TS 3.8.1.1 requires that an inoperable diesel generator be restored to an operable status within 30 days or the unit be in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in cold shutdown within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. Contrary to the above, from August 29, 2013 to October 15, 2017, a condition adverse to quality was not promptly corrected. Specifically, repairs made to the D22 lube oil filter housing to vent valve pipe nipple fitting failed to correct the cracked fitting which caused the leakage. This caused the D22 EDG to be inoperable from September 7, 2017, to October 15, 2017. The action to restore the diesel within 30 days was not met on October 7, 2017, and Unit 2 was not in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in cold shutdown within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
Disposition: This violation is being treated as an NCV, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.
Emergency Diesel Generator Combustion Air Overheating Cornerstone Significance Cross-cutting Aspect Report Section Mitigating System Green NCV 05000352/2018001-02 Opened/Closed
[P.3] -
Resolution 71153 A self-revealed Green NCV of LGS Unit 1 TS 6.8.1 and TS 3.8.1.1 was identified when Exelon failed to properly maintain an operating procedure to maintain a fail-safe design feature for the EDGs which led to the D12 EDG combustion air overheating and caused the EDG to be inoperable for greater than its TS allowed outage time.
Description:
The EDG systems are safety related standby emergency power systems for LGS Units 1 and 2. Each EDG has an air cooler coolant heat exchanger that cools the water that cools the combustion air entering the engine. A three-way thermostatic control valve maintains combustion air temperature between 115 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) and 145 °F by controlling how much emergency service water flows through this heat exchanger.
On December 7, 2017, during surveillance testing of the D12 EDG, Exelon personnel recognized that the combustion air temperature was abnormally high at 220 °F, with an expected band of 115 °F to 145 °F. The D12 EDG had run unloaded for about two hours, then fully loaded for about one hour when the condition was recognized. Exelon shutdown and declared the D12 EDG inoperable and entered TS Limiting Condition for Operation 3.8.1.1. As part of troubleshooting, the temperature indicating controller (TIC) was removed, bench tested satisfactorily, re-installed, and recalibrated to a setpoint temperature of 130°F.
Exelon found the cooling water controllers setpoint dial set at 200°F instead of at the required setpoint of 130°F. On December 12, 2017, Exelon restored and declared the D12 EDG operable.
Exelon performed a past operability review and root cause evaluation and determined that the past functionality of the D12 EDG was adversely impacted such that the EDG was inoperable since performance of the 24-hour endurance run that began on November 6, 2017. Specifically, Exelon determined that on November 6, 2017, while performing a routine running check of engine operation, an equipment operator identified that the air cooler temperature controller setpoint was not at 130°F with process temperatures off-scale low.
The low temperatures were previously identified with an existing IR, initiated on June 12, 2017. The operator adjusted the dial in order to adjust the temperature controller setpoint, in accordance with operating procedure S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel Generators. However, Exelon determined that an intermittent malfunction of the PCV in the supply air to the temperature controller caused the TIC setpoint to be lower and fail to respond. During the next engine run on December 7, 2017, the PCV delivered proper air pressure after three hours of runtime which resulted in the TIC setpoint being at 200 °F based on the as-left dial position that was established on November 6, 2017.
Exelon determined the root cause of the issue was the intermittent condition of the PCV that caused intermittent combustion air low temperature operation. Exelon further determined the contributing cause of the issue was the operating procedure directing action which introduced a failure mechanism for the cooling system that was otherwise designed to fail safe (i.e. loss of supply air results in maximum cooling with no loss of diesel function). Finally, Exelon determined the most significant organizational contributor to the issue was the organizations failure to take effective corrective action to address the known low temperature condition which was caused by the degraded pressure control valve.
Corrective Action(s): Exelon recalibrated and reinstalled the TIC, revised the operating procedure to ensure EDG functionality is maintained, and replaced the degraded PCV.
Corrective Action Reference(s): IR 4081882
Performance Assessment:
Performance Deficiency: The inspectors determined that the failure to properly maintain an operating procedure for the EDGs to maintain a fail-safe design feature was reasonably within Exelons ability to foresee and correct and should have been prevented. Specifically, there was a reasonable ability to ensure the operating procedure was appropriate to the circumstances given the previously identified intermittent combustion air low temperature operation and the failure of the TIC to respond to the dial adjustment that was directed by the operating procedure.
Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor because it adversely affected the equipment performance attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone to ensure the availability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences (i.e. core damage). Specifically, the inadequate procedure resulted in the D12 EDG being inoperable from November 6 to December 12, 2017.
Significance: The inspectors screened the significance of the finding using IMC 0609, Appendix A, Exhibit 2, and determined that this finding required a detailed risk evaluation (DRE) since the inoperability exceeded the TS allowed outage time of 30 days.
A Region I SRA completed the DRE and estimated the increase in core damage frequency (CDF) associated with this performance deficiency to be 8.8E-8/yr, or of very low safety significance (Green). To perform the DRE, the SRA used the Systems Analysis Programs for Hands-On Evaluation (SAPHIRE), Revision 8.1.6, Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR)
Model, version 8.50 for LGS Unit 1. This model was determined to require an update to appropriately modify logic and power dependencies associated with the low pressure injection motor operated valve logic. These modifications were assessed and performed by an Idaho National Labs (INL) SPAR model contractor. A limited use updated SPAR model version was posted on the INL website and used by the SRA to run the conditional assessment assuming a failure to run for the D12 EDG. The failure was assumed given the unexpected high intercooler air outlet temperatures. As noted in Exelons review of the issue, the concern with these higher temperatures was related to blower degradation and engine degradation which was determined to challenge the operability of the EDG.
The SRA reviewed procedures E-1, Loss of All AC Power, and E-10/20, Loss of Offsite Power, and determined that a best estimate value for the ability to cross-tie power from Unit 2 safety busses to Unit 1 safety busses was 6E-2. This failure probability to take cross-tie actions was calculated through the use of a SPAR-H calculation conservatively assuming barely adequate time exists, high stress, and low experience for the task. Basic event EPS-XHE-XM-DGXT, was therefore changed from TRUE to 6E-2. An exposure time of 36 days was used based on the inoperable time determined for the D12 EDG. Additionally, no recovery credit was given for the high temperature condition. This was considered a conservative assumption by the SRA given that procedure S92.9.N existed and if used during a postulated event may have resulted in observation of the nonconforming condition and subsequent action to dial back the temperature setpoint. The SRA determined this action would have returned temperatures to the normal band.
The dominant core damage sequence involved a weather related loss of offsite power, with failure of the D12 EDG, common cause failure of the remaining Unit 1 EDGs, failure to cross-tie a Unit 2 EDG to a Unit 1 safety bus, failure to depressurize given the eventual loss of direct current (DC) power, and failure to recover either offsite power or an EDG within 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />. In accordance with IMC 0609 guidance a review of the external event risk or large early release frequency was not performed given the increase in internal event CDF was below the 1E-7/yr threshold and would not be expected to change the risk estimation.
Cross-Cutting Aspect: The inspectors determined that this finding has a cross-cutting aspect in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution, Resolution, because Exelon did not take effective corrective action when the intermittent low temperature condition caused by the degraded PCV was identified. Specifically, Exelon did not take appropriate interim corrective action to address the operating procedures TIC adjustments in order to mitigate the issue while more fundamental causes were being addressed. [P.3]
Enforcement:
Violation: LGS Unit 1 TS 6.8.1, requires, in part, written procedures to be established, implemented, and maintained covering applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978. Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, Appendix A, Section 1, requires procedures with instructions prepared as appropriate for the operation of onsite emergency power sources (e.g. diesel generators). In addition, LGS Unit 1 TS 3.8.1.1 requires that an inoperable diesel generator be restored to an operable status within 30 days or the unit be in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in cold shutdown within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. Contrary to the above, Exelon did not properly maintain EDG operating procedure S92.9.N as appropriate for the operation of the EDGs.
This caused the D12 EDG to be inoperable from November 6, 2017, to December 12, 2017.
The action to restore the diesel within 30 days was not met on December 6, 2017, and Unit 1 was not in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in cold shutdown within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
Disposition: This violation is being treated as an NCV, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.
EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS
The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report.
On April 12, 2018, the inspectors presented the quarterly resident inspector inspection results to Rick Libra, Site Vice-President, and other members of the Exelon staff.
THIRD PARTY REVIEWS
Inspectors reviewed Institute on Nuclear Power Reactor reports that were issued during the inspection period.
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Procedures
GP-7, Cold Weather Preparation and Operation, Revision 53
SE-14, Snow, Revision 21
SE-9, Preparation for Severe Weather, Revision 45
Condition Reports
4088765
Procedures
1S92.1.N (COL-2), Equipment Alignment for 1B Diesel Generator Operation, Revision 32
2S55.1.A (COL), Equipment Alignment for Automatic Operation of HPCI System, Revision 19
GP-6.2, Shutdown Operations - Shutdown Cooling Tech Spec Actions, Revision 54
S51.6.A, Swapping RHR Pumps in RHR SDC Mode, Revision 18
S51.8.B, Shutdown Cooling/Reactor Coolant Recirculation Operation Start-Up and Shutdown,
Revision 81
S55.1.A, Normal HPCI Line-Up for Automatic Operation, Revision 37
ST-6-095-905-2, Unit 2 Safeguard Battery Weekly Inspection, Revision 23
ST-6-095-911-2, Div I 125/250 Vdc 2A1D101/2A2D101 Safeguard Battery Quarterly Inspection,
Revision 36
ST-6-095-915-2, Div I 125/250 Vdc 2A1D101/2A2D101 Safeguard Battery Monthly Inspection,
Revision 15
Procedures
F-A-336, Pre-Fire Plan Common, 13.2kV Switchgear Room 336, Revision 15
F-A-425, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Unit 1, Class 1E Battery 5, Revision 13
F-A-426, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Unit 2, Class 1E Battery 426 and 454, Revision 9
F-A-624, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Standby Gas Treatment Area Rooms 624 and 625, Revision 7
F-R-309, Unit 1, Safeguard Isolation Valve Area Room 309 (El 217), Revision 11
Condition Reports
20254
20452
Procedures
GP-3, Normal Plant Shutdown, Revision 164
S91.6.B, Transferring House Loads to S/U Buses, Revision 19
Condition Reports
2632557
2655420
2663432
3986074
3988302
3991456
4003680
4011371
4076445
4106926
Miscellaneous
Engage System Health Reports
Procedures
ER-AA-600-1042, On-Line Risk Management, Revision 11
OP-LG-108-117-1000, Limerick Protected Equipment Program, Revision 6
WC-AA-101-1006, On-Line Risk Management and Assessment, Revision 2
Condition Reports
4102016
4102082
Miscellaneous
E2 Work Schedule for Week of 2/25/18
Protected Equipment Scheme on 2/27/18
Protected Equipment Scheme on 3/1/18
Protected Equipment Scheme on 3/27/18 and 3/28/18
Procedures
OP-AA-102-103, Operator Work-Around Program, Revision 4
OP-AA-102-106, Operator Response Time Program, Revision 4
ON-115, Loss of Control Enclosure Cooling, Revision 25
Condition Reports
4082004
4088765
4089921
4099141
4099223
4100277
4100294
4100598
4117844
Miscellaneous
L-S-29, Chilled Water System, Revision 14
Procedures
CC-AA-10, Configuration Control Process, Revision 9
CC-AA-101, Engineering Change Requests, Revision 5
IP-ENG-001, Standard Design Process, Revision 0
ST-6-076-310-2, SGTS Reactor Enclosure Secondary Containment Integrity Test, Revision 21
Condition Reports
4085733
4105709
21117
Work Orders
4703263
27391
4733863
4738484
4750273
Miscellaneous
EC 622647, Inflatable Seal - Secondary Containment, Revision 2
ECR 433952
Procedures
M-095-005, Replacement of Station Battery Cells, Revision 10
PES-S-004, Sampling Plan, Revision 2
ST-2-049-100-2, RCIC Logic System Functional: Simulated Automatic Actuation Test, Revision
ST-2-049-101-2, RCIC Logic System Functional: Isolation Logic Test, Revision 16
ST-6-092-312-1, D12 Diesel Generator Slow Start Operability Test Run, Revision 103
Condition Reports
0379493
0381794
4081625
4094240
4103817
4104251
Work Orders
1382270
243506
255083
4595702
4699475
Miscellaneous
CGIFU01, EPRI CGI Joint Utility Task Group Commercial Grade Item Evaluation for UL 198E
Inspection Report 0101903
LIM-72331, Failure Analysis of Fuses, 12/27/17
Listed Fuses, 7/9/91
Procedures
ST-6-052-231-1, A Loop Core Spray Pump, Valve, and Flow Test, Revision 83
ST-6-052-232-1, B Loop Core Spray Pump, Valve, and Flow Test, Revision 74
Routine
Procedures
RT-6-051-320-1, B RHR Remote Operability Test, Revision 7
ST-2-074-642-1, Source Range and Intermediate Range Neutron Monitor Pre-Shutdown
Functional Test, Revision 8
ST-6-092-113-2, D23 Diesel Generator 24 Hour Endurance Test, Revision 43
Condition Reports
4116219
Containment Isolation Valve
Procedures
ST-4-LLR-031-1, Main Steam Line A, Revision 13
ST-4-LLR-041-1, Main Steam Line B, Revision 12
Work Orders
4309668
4310968
Procedures
RP-AA-600, Radioactive Material/Waste Shipments, Revision 16
RP-AA-600-1001, Exclusive Use and Emergency Response Information, Revision 9
RP-AA-600-1002, Highway Route Controlled Quantity/Advanced Notification for
Radioactive/Waste Shipments, Revision 6
RP-AA-600-1003, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Barnwell and the Defense Consolidation
Facility (DCF), Revision 10
RP-AA-600-1004, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Energy Solutions Clive Utah Disposal Site
Containerized Waste Facility, Revision 13
RP-AA-600-1005, Radioactive Material and Non Disposal Site Waste Shipments, Rev 19
RP-AA-600-1006, Shipment of Category 1 Quantities of Radioactive Material or Waste
(Category 1 RAMQC), Revision 11
RP-AA-600-1007, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Energy Solutions Clive Utah Disposal
Facility Bulk Waste Facility (BWF), Revision 8
RP-AA-600-1008, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Waste Control Specialists (WCS) Disposal
Facility, Revision 5
RP-AA-600-1009, Shipment of Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive Material or Waste
(Category 2 RAMQC), Revision 2
RP-AA-600-1010, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Creating Containers, Samples,
Waste Streams and Waste Types, Revision 2
RP-AA-600-1011, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Gross Gamma Characterization and
Generation of Shipping Paperwork, Revision 4
RP-AA-600-1012, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Direct Sample Characterization and
Generation of Shipping Paperwork, Revision 2
RP-AA-600-1014, Use and Operation of WMG Software Filter Module, Revision 2
RP-AA-600-1015, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Outage Service Module, Revision 3
RP-AA-600-1016, Use and Operation of the WMG Software for Characterization of
Miscellaneous Items, Revision 0
RP-AA-601, Surveying Radioactive Material Shipments, Revision 20
RP-AA-602, Packaging of Radioactive Material Shipments, Revision 20
RP-AA-602-1001, Packaging of Radioactive Material/Waste Shipments, Revision 17
RP-AA-602-1002, Loading Dry Active Waste and Other Waste Forms for Energy Solutions
Waste Acceptance Guide (WAG-501), Revision 0
RP-AA-602-1003, Radioactive Materials/Waste Shipments Transported Via Rail, Revision 1
RP-AA-603, Inspection and Loading of Radioactive Material Shipments, Rev 10
RP-AA-605, 10 CFR 61 Program, Revision 7
RP-AA-607, Radioactive Material Shipped in Accordance With IATA requirements, Revision 5
RW-AA-100, Process Control Program for Radioactive Wastes, Revision 12
RW-AA-605, 10 CFR 61 Program, Revision 7
Quality Assurance
NOSA-LIM-16-04, Chemistry, Radwaste, Effluent and Environmental Monitoring Audit Report
EnergySolutions Internal Audit CORP-16-004, Clive Facility
NUPIC 24365, EnergySolutions
NUPIC 24515, Waste Control Specialists, LLC
CFR Part 61 Scaling Factors
Waste Sludge Tank; Deep Bed; Dry Active Waste; Fuel Floor; Reactor Water Clean-Up
Condition Reports
3955208
28930
4085448
4092536
4092545
4092549
4092556
4092578
Training
RC-102, Use of WMG Programs and Regulatory Interface
RC-300, Transportation of Radioactive Material by Air
Shipments
MW-16-010; MW-16-045; MW-16-059; MW-17-006; MW-17-031
71151
Procedures
LS-AA-2200, Mitigating System Performance Index Data Acquisition and Reporting, Revision 5
NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7
Miscellaneous
MSPI Data
Operation Narrative Logs
Power History Graphs
Procedures
ARC-BOP-1BC514 C1, Lube Oil Temp High, Revision 1
ARC-BOP-2BC514 B2,
- J.W. Temp High, Revision 1
E-1, Loss of All AC Power (Station Blackout), Revision 51
E-1, Loss of All AC Power (Station Blackout), Revision 51
E-10/20, Loss of Offsite Power, Revision 56
E-10/20, Loss of Offsite Power, Revision 56
MA-AA-716-017, Station Rework Reduction Program, Revision 7
S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel Generators, Revision 73
S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel Generators, Revision 74
ST-2-020-401-1, Electrical Power Systems 1BG501 Diesel Generator Critical and Non-Critical
Instruments Calibration / Functional Test, Revision 31
ST-6-092-112-1, D12 Diesel Generator 24 Hour Endurance Test, Revision 39
ST-6-092-312-1, D12 Diesel Generator Slow Start Operability Test Run, Revision 103
ST-6-092-316-1, D12 Diesel Generator Fast Start Operability Test Run, Revision 54
ST-6-092-362-2, D22 Diesel Generator Operability Verification, Revision 40
ST-6-092-362-2, D22 Diesel Generator Operability Verification, Revision 40
Condition Reports
1108417
22131
24515
21268
4049989
4062096
4069001
4070641
4073004
4081882
4082219
Work Orders
2075815
2079589
292476
4318057
4642785
4650838
4650858
4652385
4652410
4652412
4663824
4672813
4686262
4697246
Miscellaneous
ANSI/ASME B1.20.1, Pipe Threads, General Purpose (Inch), 1983
LIM-64785, Failure Analysis of a Threaded Pipe Nipple from Limerick Station, 12/5/2017
L-S-07, Diesel Generator and Auxiliary Systems, Revision 15
L-S-07, Diesel Generator and Auxiliary Systems, Revision 15
PES-S-006, Code Reconciliation, Revision 6
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
2100 RENAISSANCE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100
KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-2713
May 11, 2018
Mr. Bryan C. Hanson
Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC
President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear
4300 Winfield Road
Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT:
LIMERICK GENERATING STATION - INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT
05000352/2018001 AND 05000353/2018001
Dear Mr. Hanson:
On March 31, 2018, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection
at Limerick Generating Station (LGS), Units 1 and 2. On April 12, 2018, the NRC inspectors
discussed the results of this inspection with Rick Libra, Site Vice-President, and other members
of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report.
NRC inspectors documented two findings of very low safety significance (Green) in this report.
These findings involved violations of NRC requirements. The NRC is treating these violations
as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the Enforcement Policy.
If you contest the violations or significance of these NCVs, you should provide a response within
days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with
copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC
Resident Inspector at LG
- S. In addition, if you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment,
you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis
for your disagreement, to the
- U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control
Desk, Washington, DC, 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I, and
the NRC Resident Inspector at LGS.
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection
and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the NRCs Public Document
Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2.390,
Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
Sincerely,
/RA/
James
- A. Krafty, Acting Chief
Reactor Projects Branch 4
Division of Reactor Projects
B. Hanson
Docket Numbers: 50-352 and 50-353
License Numbers: NPF-39 and NPF-85
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000352/2018001
and 05000353/2018001
cc w/encl:
Distribution via ListServ
SUNSI Review
Non-Sensitive
Sensitive
Publicly Available
Non-Publicly Available
OFFICE
RI/DRP
RI/DRP
RI/DRP
NAME
S. Rutenkroger
S. Barber/jk for
J. Krafty
DATE
05/10/18
5/10/18
5/11/18
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Inspection Report
Docket Numbers:
50-352 and 50-353
License Numbers:
Report Numbers:
05000352/2018001 and 05000353/2018001
Enterprise Identifier:
I-2018-001-0071
Licensee:
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
Facility:
Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 & 2
Location:
Sanatoga, PA 19464
Inspection Dates:
January 1, 2018 through March 31, 2018
Inspectors:
- S. Rutenkroger, PhD, Senior Resident Inspector
- M. Fannon, Resident Inspector
- H. Anagnostopoulos, Senior Health Physicist
- J. Furia, Senior Health Physicist
Approved By:
- J. Krafty, Acting Chief
Reactor Projects Branch 4
Division of Reactor Projects
SUMMARY
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring Exelons performance at
Limerick Generating Station Units 1 and 2 by conducting the baseline inspections described in
this report in accordance with the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process
is the NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors.
Refer to https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more information. NRC
identified and self-revealed findings, violations, and additional items are summarized in the table
below.
List of Findings and Violations
Failure of Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Pipe Nipple Fitting
Cornerstone
Significance
Cross-cutting
Aspect
Report
Section
Mitigating
Systems
Green NCV 05000353/2018001-01
Opened/Closed
[P.1] -
Identification
A self-revealed Green non-cited violation (NCV) of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI,
Corrective Action, and LGS Unit 2 technical specification (TS) 3.8.1.1 was identified when
Exelon failed to correct a degraded lube oil pipe nipple fitting on the D22 emergency diesel
generator (EDG) when maintenance was performed to address leakage which caused
inoperability of the EDG for greater than its TS allowed outage time.
Emergency Diesel Generator Combustion Air Overheating
Cornerstone
Significance
Cross-cutting
Aspect
Report
Section
Mitigating
Systems
Green NCV 05000352/2018001-02
Opened/Closed
[P.3] -
Resolution
A self-revealed Green NCV of LGS Unit 1 TS 6.8.1 and TS 3.8.1.1 was identified when Exelon
failed to properly maintain an operating procedure to maintain a fail-safe design feature for the
EDGs which led to the D12 EDG combustion air overheating and caused the EDG to be
inoperable for greater than its TS allowed outage time.
Additional Tracking Items
Type
Issue number
Title
Report
Section
Status
05000353/2017-008-01
EDG Inoperable for Greater
Than 30 Days Resulting in a
Condition Prohibited by
Technical Specifications
Closed
D12 EDG Inoperable for
Greater than 30 Days
Resulting in a Condition
Prohibited by TS
Closed
PLANT STATUS
Unit 1 began the inspection period at rated thermal power. On March 25 to 26, 2018, the unit
was down powered and shutdown for a planned refueling outage. The unit remained shutdown
for the refueling outage for the remainder of the inspection period.
Unit 2 began the inspection period at rated thermal power. On March 17, 2018, the unit was
down powered to 64 percent to repair a main condenser tube leak. The unit was returned to
rated thermal power the same day and remained at or near rated thermal power for the
remainder of the inspection period.
INSPECTION SCOPES
Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in
effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with
their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared
complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met
consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection
Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors performed plant status activities described in
IMC 2515 Appendix D, Plant Status and conducted routine reviews using IP 71152, Problem
Identification and Resolution. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records,
observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess Exelons performance and compliance
with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards.
REACTOR SAFETY
71111.01 - Adverse Weather Protection
Impending Severe Weather (2 samples)
(1) The inspectors evaluated readiness for impending adverse weather conditions for the
onset of winter weather, including high winds, on January 5, 2018.
(2) The inspectors evaluated readiness for impending adverse weather conditions for the
onset of winter weather, including high winds, on March 2, 2018.
71111.04 - Equipment Alignment
Partial Walkdown (5 samples)
The inspectors evaluated system configurations during partial walkdowns of the following
systems/trains:
(1) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection on January 16 and 17, 2018
(2) Unit 1 D11 and D13 emergency diesel generators (EDGs) on February 5, 2018
(3) Unit 2 2A batteries and chargers during 2BD101 battery planned maintenance on
February 5 through 9, 2018
(4) Unit 1 B residual heat removal subsystem in shutdown cooling during the A emergency
core cooling subsystem maintenance window on March 27, 2018
(5) Unit 1 D12 EDG during the division 1 and 3 direct current bus maintenance window on
March 28, 2018
71111.05 - Fire Protection
Quarterly Inspection (5 samples)
The inspectors evaluated fire protection program implementation in the following selected
areas:
(1) Fire area 2, Unit common 13.2kV switchgear room, elevation 217, on January 8, 2018
(2) Fire area 8, Unit 1 class 1E battery room, elevation 239, on January 23, 2018
(3) Fire area 10, Unit 2 class 1E battery rooms, elevation 239, on February 5, 2018
(4) Fire area 28, Unit common standby gas treatment area rooms, elevation 332, on
February 27, 201
(5) Fire area 43, Unit 1 safeguard isolation valve area room 309, elevation 217, on
March 28, 2018
71111.11 - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance
Operator Requalification (1 sample)
The inspectors observed and evaluated licensed operator simulator training scenarios on
February 20, 2018.
Operator Performance (1 sample)
The inspectors observed the downpower and normal plant shutdown of Unit 1 for a planned
refueling outage on March 25 and 26, 2018
71111.12 - Maintenance Effectiveness
Routine Maintenance Effectiveness (2 samples)
The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of routine maintenance activities associated
with the following equipment and/or safety significant functions:
(1) Unit 1 reactor manual control system
(2) Unit 2 reactor manual control system
71111.13 - Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control (6 samples)
The inspectors evaluated the risk assessments for the following planned and emergent
work activities:
(1) Unit 2 reactor core isolation cooling relay replacements on January 16 and 17, 2018
(2) Unit common B control room emergency fresh air system testing on February 7, 2018
(3) Unit 2 A residual heat removal maintenance on February 26 and 27, 2018
(4) Unit common A standby gas treatment system maintenance on February 27, 2018
(5) Unit common A emergency service water, A standby gas treatment system, and
Unit 2 A reactor enclosure recirculation system maintenance on March 1, 2018
(6) Unit 1 A emergency core cooling system maintenance during reduced core inventory
in the refueling outage on March 27 and 28, 2018
71111.15 - Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments (6 samples)
The inspectors evaluated the following operability determinations and functionality
assessments:
(1) Unit 2, D21 EDG room low temperature alarm on December 31, 2017
(2) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection condensate pump discharge check valve failure on
January 25, 2018
(3) Unit 2 high pressure coolant injection vacuum breaker check valve oversized disc on
January 31, 2018
(4) Unit common A emergency service water pump motor step voltage test leakage current
on January 31, 2018
(5) Unit 2 D21 EDG multiple battery ground alarms while raising speed during the slow
start surveillance test on February 2, 2018
(6) Unit common, B control room air supply controller not properly maintaining room
temperature on February 4, 2018
71111.18 - Plant Modifications (2 samples)
The inspectors evaluated the following temporary or permanent modifications:
(1) Engineering change package 622647 - Inflatable Seal - Secondary Containment
(2) Engineering change request 433952, D23 Repair of the Blower Inspection Cover Bolt
Holes Using Stainless Steel Heli-Coil Thread Inserts
71111.19 - Post Maintenance Testing (6 samples)
The inspectors evaluated post maintenance testing for the following maintenance/repair
activities:
(1) Unit 2 D24 EDG fuse replacement following an intermittent issue in the automatic start
logic circuit on December 6, 2017
(2) Unit 2 reactor core isolation cooling relay replacements on January 16 and 17, 2018
(3) Unit 1 D12 EDG air cooler temperature indicator controller pressure control valve (PCV)
replacement on February 5, 2018
(4) Unit 2 B2 battery cell replacements on February 5 and 6, 2018
(5) Unit 2 B2 battery charger current adjustment on February 15, 2018
(6) Unit 2 D24 EDG heating, ventilation, and cooling fan controller replacement on
February 22, 2018
71111.20 - Refueling and Other Outage Activities
The inspectors evaluated the Unit 1 refueling outage 1R17 from March 26, 2018, through
the end of the inspection period. The following portions of the inspection procedure were
not performed during this period.
(1) Fatigue Management
(2) Startup
71111.22 - Surveillance Testing
The inspectors evaluated the following surveillance tests:
Routine (3 samples)
(1) ST-6-092-113-2, D23 EDG 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> endurance run on January 18 and 19, 2018
(2) RT-6-051-320-1, Unit 1 B residual heat removal remote operation test on
February 7, 2018
(3) ST-2-074-642-1, Unit 1 source range and intermediate range neutron monitors pre-
shutdown testing on March 18, 2018
In-service (2 samples)
(1) ST-6-052-231-1, Unit 1 A core spray pump, valve, and flow test on January 4, 2018
(2) ST-6-052-232-1, Unit 1 B core spray pump, valve, and flow test on March 10, 2018
Containment Isolation Valve (2 samples)
(1) ST-4-LLR-031-1, Unit 1 main steam line A inboard and outboard isolation valves
leakage rate testing on March 29, 2018
(2) ST-4-LLR-041-1, Unit 1 main steam line B inboard and outboard isolation valves
leakage rate testing on March 29, 2018
RADIATION SAFETY
71124.02 - Occupational As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) Planning and Controls
Radiological Work Planning (1 sample)
The inspectors evaluated Exelons radiological work planning by reviewing the following
activities:
(1) ALARA Plan 2017-101
(2) ALARA Plan 2017-050
(3) ALARA Plan 2017-052
Verification of Dose Estimates and Exposure Tracking Systems (1 sample)
The inspectors evaluated dose estimates and exposure tracking.
71124.08 - Radioactive Solid Waste Processing and Radioactive Material Handling, Storage,
and Transportation
Radioactive Material Storage (1 sample)
The inspectors observed radioactive waste container storage areas and verified the postings
and controls and that Exelon had established a process for monitoring the impact of long-
term storage of the waste.
Radioactive Waste System Walkdown (1 sample)
The inspectors walked down the following:
Accessible portions of liquid and solid radioactive waste processing systems to verify
current system alignment and material condition
Abandoned in place radioactive waste processing equipment to review the controls
in place to ensure protection of personnel
Changes made to the radioactive waste processing systems since the last inspection
Processes for mixing and transferring radioactive waste resin and/or sludge
discharges into shipping/disposal containers
Current methods and procedures for dewatering waste
Waste Characterization and Classification (1 sample)
The inspectors identified radioactive waste streams and reviewed radiochemical sample
analysis results to support radioactive waste characterization. The inspectors reviewed the
use of scaling factors and calculations to account for difficult-to-measure radionuclides.
Shipment Preparation (1 sample)
The inspectors reviewed the records of shipment packaging, surveying, labeling, marking,
placarding, vehicle checks, emergency instructions, disposal manifest, shipping papers
provided to the driver, and Exelons verification of shipment readiness.
Shipping Records (1 sample)
The inspectors reviewed selected non-excepted package shipment records.
OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE
71151 - Performance Indicator Verification (6 samples)
The inspectors verified Exelons performance indicator submittals listed below for the
period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.
(1) Unit 1 and Unit 2 Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours
(2) Unit 1 and Unit 2 High Pressure Injection Systems
(3) Unit 1 and Unit 2 Heat Removal Systems
71153 - Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion
Licensee Event Reports (LER) (2 samples)
The inspectors evaluated the following licensee event reports which can be accessed at
https://lersearch.inl.gov/LERSearchCriteria.aspx:
(1) LER 05000353/2017-008-00 and 05000353/2017-008-01, EDG Inoperable for Greater
Than 30 Days Resulting in a Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications, on
December 11, 2017, and February 22, 2018. The review for this event is documented in
the inspection results section.
(2) LER 05000352/2018-001-00, D12 EDG Inoperable for Greater than 30 Days Resulting in
a Condition Prohibited by TS, on February 5, 2018. The review for this event is
documented in the inspection results section.
INSPECTION RESULTS
Failure of Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Pipe Nipple Fitting
Cornerstone
Significance
Cross-cutting
Aspect
Report
Section
Mitigating
Systems
Green
Opened/Closed
[P.1] -
Identification
A self-revealed Green non-cited violation (NCV) of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI,
Corrective Action, and LGS Unit 2 technical specification (TS) 3.8.1.1 was identified when
Exelon failed to correct a degraded lube oil pipe nipple fitting on the D22 EDG when
maintenance was performed to address leakage which caused inoperability of the EDG for
greater than its TS allowed outage time.
Description: The EDG systems are safety related standby emergency power systems for
LGS Units 1 and 2 consisting of four diesel generator sets per unit. Each EDG has a lube oil
system that cools the diesel engine, lubricates the engine wear surfaces (moving parts), and
captures friction wear products. On October 11, 2017, during testing of the D22 EDG,
Exelon personnel identified a lube oil leak from a 0.5 inch tapered thread pipe nipple fitting
between the lube oil filter and the lube oil filter vent valve. The personnel estimated the leak
to be approximately 0.03125 gallons per minute (gpm) (about one-half cup per minute), and
Exelon declared the EDG inoperable.
Exelon performed an equipment corrective action program evaluation and identified that the
same fitting was found to be leaking and/or weeping on August 31, 2010, and October 3,
2012. After identifying leakage on August 31, 2010, Exelon removed, cleaned, visually
inspected, and reinstalled the fitting with thread sealant on November 29, 2011. After the
second identification of leakage on October 3, 2012, Exelon performed a similar repair for a
second time on August 29, 2013. Exelon planned a similar repair when the fitting leaked for a
third time on September 7, 2017. The repair was initially planned for October 6, 2017, but
was subsequently rescheduled for November 3, 2017. Exelon identified three through-wall
cracks and irregular threads in the fitting and concluded the apparent cause of the failure on
October 11, 2017, was age related cyclic fatigue induced by diesel engine vibration. Exelon
also determined that the repairs made in 2011 and 2013 contributed to the stresses and crack
development and propagation rate based on galling of the threads, wrench marks on the
exterior of the fitting, and deeper thread engagement.
The inspectors determined that a rework investigation was required by Exelon procedure MA-
AA-716-017, Station Rework Reduction Program, when leakage was identified the second
time. Exelon was unable to find evidence that a rework investigation was performed or
provide a basis for not performing one. The inspectors concluded a rework investigation
would have reasonably provided additional focus and oversight on the subsequent
maintenance performed on August 29, 2013. The inspectors determined that additional focus
would have provided an opportunity to identify the galled threads on the pipe nipple, the high
installation torque required to insert the nipple, and the deeper thread engagement of the
nipple following the repair (the nipple was essentially fully inserted into the housing). The
fittings condition indicated additional tightening of at least two additional threads beyond
original installation which is outside the tolerances of ASME B1.20.1, Pipe Threads, General
Purpose (Inch). Based on these conditions, the inspectors determined that Exelon had a
reasonable opportunity to foresee and correct the degraded fitting as required by Exelon
procedure PI-AA-125, Corrective Action Program (CAP) Procedure, when the second repair
was performed.
The inspectors also noted that when maintenance personnel fabricated a replacement fitting
after the October 11, 2017, failure, the new fitting leaked during post-maintenance testing.
Maintenance personnel responded by tightening the fitting further, and the fitting leaked again
during post-maintenance testing. Exelon then removed the fitting, determined the threads of
the new fitting were not satisfactory, that personnel had not verified the threads were properly
cut, and fabricated a second new fitting. Although the performance deficiency occurred on
August 29, 2013, the inspectors considered the above and determined the applicable cross-
cutting aspect of not recognizing deviations from ASME standards, training, and skill of the
craft when taking action to address leakage was indicative of current performance.
Corrective Action(s): Exelon replaced the fitting and restored operability of the EDG on
October 15, 2017, revised equipment data to require replacement of a pipe nipple fitting
instead of reusing if a future leak is identified, and initiated actions to replace similar fittings
for extent of condition.
Corrective Action Reference(s): Issue Report (IR) 4070641
Performance Assessment:
Performance Deficiency: The inspectors determined that the failure to correct a degraded
lube oil pipe nipple fitting on the D22 EDG when maintenance was performed to address
leakage was reasonably within Exelons ability to foresee and correct and should have been
prevented.
Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor
because it adversely affected the equipment performance attribute of the mitigating systems
cornerstone to ensure the availability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent
undesirable consequences (i.e. core damage). Specifically, the issue caused the D22 EDG
to be inoperable from September 7 to October 15, 2017.
Significance: The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using IMC 0609,
Appendix AProperty "Inspection Manual Chapter" (as page type) with input value "NRC Inspection Manual 0609,</br></br>Appendix A" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process., Exhibit 2, and determined that this finding was of very low safety significance
(Green). Specifically, the inspectors, in consultation with a Region I senior reactor analyst
(SRA), determined that the condition did not represent an actual loss of the D22 EDG
probabilistic risk assessment safety function, i.e. the capability to provide power for up to 24
hours. The lube oil storage tank contained over 216 gallons during the period.
The lube oil consumption rate was less than 0.05 gpm. The leak rate was consistent at about
0.03125 gpm. Therefore, at a minimum the lube oil storage tank contained sufficient oil to
make up to the D22 EDG oil reservoir for over 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> of EDG operation.
Cross-Cutting Aspect: The inspectors determined that this finding has a cross-cutting aspect
in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution, Identification, because Exelon personnel
did not recognize deviations from standards, training, and skill of the craft when addressing
leakage. [P.1]
Enforcement:
Violation: 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, requires, in part, that
measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as
deficiencies, defective material, and non-conformances are promptly identified and corrected.
LGS Unit 2 TS 3.8.1.1 requires that an inoperable diesel generator be restored to an operable
status within 30 days or the unit be in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in
cold shutdown within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. Contrary to the above, from August 29, 2013 to
October 15, 2017, a condition adverse to quality was not promptly corrected. Specifically,
repairs made to the D22 lube oil filter housing to vent valve pipe nipple fitting failed to correct
the cracked fitting which caused the leakage. This caused the D22 EDG to be inoperable
from September 7, 2017, to October 15, 2017. The action to restore the diesel within 30 days
was not met on October 7, 2017, and Unit 2 was not in at least hot shutdown within the next
hours and in cold shutdown within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
Disposition: This violation is being treated as an NCV, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the
Emergency Diesel Generator Combustion Air Overheating
Cornerstone
Significance
Cross-cutting
Aspect
Report
Section
Mitigating System
Green
Opened/Closed
[P.3] -
Resolution
A self-revealed Green NCV of LGS Unit 1 TS 6.8.1 and TS 3.8.1.1 was identified when
Exelon failed to properly maintain an operating procedure to maintain a fail-safe design
feature for the EDGs which led to the D12 EDG combustion air overheating and caused the
EDG to be inoperable for greater than its TS allowed outage time.
Description: The EDG systems are safety related standby emergency power systems for
LGS Units 1 and 2. Each EDG has an air cooler coolant heat exchanger that cools the water
that cools the combustion air entering the engine. A three-way thermostatic control valve
maintains combustion air temperature between 115 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) and 145 °F by
controlling how much emergency service water flows through this heat exchanger.
On December 7, 2017, during surveillance testing of the D12 EDG, Exelon personnel
recognized that the combustion air temperature was abnormally high at 220 °F, with an
expected band of 115 °F to 145 °
then fully loaded for about one hour when the condition was recognized. Exelon shutdown
and declared the D12 EDG inoperable and entered TS Limiting Condition for Operation
3.8.1.1. As part of troubleshooting, the temperature indicating controller (TIC) was removed,
bench tested satisfactorily, re-installed, and recalibrated to a setpoint temperature of 130°F.
Exelon found the cooling water controllers setpoint dial set at 200°F instead of at the required
setpoint of 130°
- F. On December 12, 2017, Exelon restored and declared the D12 EDG
Exelon performed a past operability review and root cause evaluation and determined that the
past functionality of the D12 EDG was adversely impacted such that the EDG was
inoperable since performance of the 24-hour endurance run that began on November 6,
2017. Specifically, Exelon determined that on November 6, 2017, while performing a routine
running check of engine operation, an equipment operator identified that the air cooler
temperature controller setpoint was not at 130°F with process temperatures off-scale low.
The low temperatures were previously identified with an existing IR, initiated on
June 12, 2017. The operator adjusted the dial in order to adjust the temperature controller
setpoint, in accordance with operating procedure S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel
Generators. However, Exelon determined that an intermittent malfunction of the PCV in the
supply air to the temperature controller caused the TIC setpoint to be lower and fail to
respond. During the next engine run on December 7, 2017, the PCV delivered proper air
pressure after three hours of runtime which resulted in the TIC setpoint being at 200 °F based
on the as-left dial position that was established on November 6, 2017.
Exelon determined the root cause of the issue was the intermittent condition of the PCV that
caused intermittent combustion air low temperature operation. Exelon further determined the
contributing cause of the issue was the operating procedure directing action which introduced
a failure mechanism for the cooling system that was otherwise designed to fail safe (i.e. loss
of supply air results in maximum cooling with no loss of diesel function). Finally, Exelon
determined the most significant organizational contributor to the issue was the organizations
failure to take effective corrective action to address the known low temperature condition
which was caused by the degraded pressure control valve.
Corrective Action(s): Exelon recalibrated and reinstalled the TIC, revised the operating
procedure to ensure EDG functionality is maintained, and replaced the degraded PCV.
Corrective Action Reference(s): IR 4081882
Performance Assessment:
Performance Deficiency: The inspectors determined that the failure to properly maintain an
operating procedure for the EDGs to maintain a fail-safe design feature was reasonably within
Exelons ability to foresee and correct and should have been prevented. Specifically, there
was a reasonable ability to ensure the operating procedure was appropriate to the
circumstances given the previously identified intermittent combustion air low temperature
operation and the failure of the TIC to respond to the dial adjustment that was directed by the
operating procedure.
Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor
because it adversely affected the equipment performance attribute of the mitigating systems
cornerstone to ensure the availability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent
undesirable consequences (i.e. core damage). Specifically, the inadequate procedure
resulted in the D12 EDG being inoperable from November 6 to December 12, 2017.
Significance: The inspectors screened the significance of the finding using IMC 0609,
Appendix AProperty "Inspection Manual Chapter" (as page type) with input value "NRC Inspection Manual 0609,</br></br>Appendix A" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process., Exhibit 2, and determined that this finding required a detailed risk evaluation
(DRE) since the inoperability exceeded the TS allowed outage time of 30 days.
A Region I SRA completed the DRE and estimated the increase in core damage frequency
(CDF) associated with this performance deficiency to be 8.8E-8/yr, or of very low safety
significance (Green). To perform the DRE, the SRA used the Systems Analysis Programs for
Hands-On Evaluation (SAPHIRE), Revision 8.1.6, Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR)
Model, version 8.50 for LGS Unit 1. This model was determined to require an update to
appropriately modify logic and power dependencies associated with the low pressure injection
motor operated valve logic. These modifications were assessed and performed by an Idaho
National Labs (INL) SPAR model contractor. A limited use updated SPAR model version was
posted on the INL website and used by the SRA to run the conditional assessment assuming
a failure to run for the D12 EDG. The failure was assumed given the unexpected high
intercooler air outlet temperatures. As noted in Exelons review of the issue, the concern with
these higher temperatures was related to blower degradation and engine degradation which
was determined to challenge the operability of the EDG.
The SRA reviewed procedures E-1, Loss of All AC Power, and E-10/20, Loss of Offsite
Power, and determined that a best estimate value for the ability to cross-tie power from
Unit 2 safety busses to Unit 1 safety busses was 6E-2. This failure probability to take cross-
tie actions was calculated through the use of a SPAR-H calculation conservatively assuming
barely adequate time exists, high stress, and low experience for the task. Basic event
EPS-XHE-XM-DGXT, was therefore changed from TRUE to 6E-2. An exposure time of
days was used based on the inoperable time determined for the D12 ED
no recovery credit was given for the high temperature condition. This was considered a
conservative assumption by the SRA given that procedure S92.9.N existed and if used during
a postulated event may have resulted in observation of the nonconforming condition and
subsequent action to dial back the temperature setpoint. The SRA determined this action
would have returned temperatures to the normal band.
The dominant core damage sequence involved a weather related loss of offsite power, with
failure of the D12 EDG, common cause failure of the remaining Unit 1 EDGs, failure to cross-
tie a Unit 2 EDG to a Unit 1 safety bus, failure to depressurize given the eventual loss of
direct current (DC) power, and failure to recover either offsite power or an EDG within
hours. In accordance with IMC 0609 guidance a review of the external event risk or large
early release frequency was not performed given the increase in internal event CDF was
below the 1E-7/yr threshold and would not be expected to change the risk estimation.
Cross-Cutting Aspect: The inspectors determined that this finding has a cross-cutting aspect
in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution, Resolution, because Exelon did not take
effective corrective action when the intermittent low temperature condition caused by the
degraded PCV was identified. Specifically, Exelon did not take appropriate interim corrective
action to address the operating procedures TIC adjustments in order to mitigate the issue
while more fundamental causes were being addressed. [P.3]
Enforcement:
Violation: LGS Unit 1 TS 6.8.1, requires, in part, written procedures to be established,
implemented, and maintained covering applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of
Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978. Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2,
Appendix A, Section 1, requires procedures with instructions prepared as appropriate for the
operation of onsite emergency power sources (e.g. diesel generators). In addition, LGS
Unit 1 TS 3.8.1.1 requires that an inoperable diesel generator be restored to an operable
status within 30 days or the unit be in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in
cold shutdown within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. Contrary to the above, Exelon did not properly
maintain EDG operating procedure S92.9.N as appropriate for the operation of the EDGs.
This caused the D12 EDG to be inoperable from November 6, 2017, to December 12, 2017.
The action to restore the diesel within 30 days was not met on December 6, 2017, and Unit 1
was not in at least hot shutdown within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in cold shutdown within the
following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
Disposition: This violation is being treated as an NCV, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the
EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS
The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report.
On April 12, 2018, the inspectors presented the quarterly resident inspector inspection
results to Rick Libra, Site Vice-President, and other members of the Exelon staff.
THIRD PARTY REVIEWS
Inspectors reviewed Institute on Nuclear Power Reactor reports that were issued during the
inspection period.
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Procedures
GP-7, Cold Weather Preparation and Operation, Revision 53
SE-14, Snow, Revision 21
SE-9, Preparation for Severe Weather, Revision 45
Condition Reports
4088765
Procedures
1S92.1.N (COL-2), Equipment Alignment for 1B Diesel Generator Operation, Revision 32
2S55.1.A (COL), Equipment Alignment for Automatic Operation of HPCI System, Revision 19
GP-6.2, Shutdown Operations - Shutdown Cooling Tech Spec Actions, Revision 54
S51.6.A, Swapping RHR Pumps in RHR SDC Mode, Revision 18
S51.8.B, Shutdown Cooling/Reactor Coolant Recirculation Operation Start-Up and Shutdown,
Revision 81
S55.1.A, Normal HPCI Line-Up for Automatic Operation, Revision 37
ST-6-095-905-2, Unit 2 Safeguard Battery Weekly Inspection, Revision 23
ST-6-095-911-2, Div I 125/250 Vdc 2A1D101/2A2D101 Safeguard Battery Quarterly Inspection,
Revision 36
ST-6-095-915-2, Div I 125/250 Vdc 2A1D101/2A2D101 Safeguard Battery Monthly Inspection,
Revision 15
Procedures
F-A-336, Pre-Fire Plan Common, 13.2kV Switchgear Room 336, Revision 15
F-A-425, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Unit 1, Class 1E Battery 5, Revision 13
F-A-426, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Unit 2, Class 1E Battery 426 and 454, Revision 9
F-A-624, Pre-Fire Plan Common, Standby Gas Treatment Area Rooms 624 and 625, Revision 7
F-R-309, Unit 1, Safeguard Isolation Valve Area Room 309 (El 217), Revision 11
Condition Reports
20254
20452
Procedures
GP-3, Normal Plant Shutdown, Revision 164
S91.6.B, Transferring House Loads to S/U Buses, Revision 19
Condition Reports
2632557
2655420
2663432
3986074
3988302
3991456
4003680
4011371
4076445
4106926
Miscellaneous
Engage System Health Reports
Procedures
ER-AA-600-1042, On-Line Risk Management, Revision 11
OP-LG-108-117-1000, Limerick Protected Equipment Program, Revision 6
WC-AA-101-1006, On-Line Risk Management and Assessment, Revision 2
Condition Reports
4102016
4102082
Miscellaneous
E2 Work Schedule for Week of 2/25/18
Protected Equipment Scheme on 2/27/18
Protected Equipment Scheme on 3/1/18
Protected Equipment Scheme on 3/27/18 and 3/28/18
Procedures
OP-AA-102-103, Operator Work-Around Program, Revision 4
OP-AA-102-106, Operator Response Time Program, Revision 4
ON-115, Loss of Control Enclosure Cooling, Revision 25
Condition Reports
4082004
4088765
4089921
4099141
4099223
4100277
4100294
4100598
4117844
Miscellaneous
L-S-29, Chilled Water System, Revision 14
Procedures
CC-AA-10, Configuration Control Process, Revision 9
CC-AA-101, Engineering Change Requests, Revision 5
IP-ENG-001, Standard Design Process, Revision 0
ST-6-076-310-2, SGTS Reactor Enclosure Secondary Containment Integrity Test, Revision 21
Condition Reports
4085733
4105709
21117
Work Orders
4703263
27391
4733863
4738484
4750273
Miscellaneous
EC 622647, Inflatable Seal - Secondary Containment, Revision 2
ECR 433952
Procedures
M-095-005, Replacement of Station Battery Cells, Revision 10
PES-S-004, Sampling Plan, Revision 2
ST-2-049-100-2, RCIC Logic System Functional: Simulated Automatic Actuation Test, Revision
ST-2-049-101-2, RCIC Logic System Functional: Isolation Logic Test, Revision 16
ST-6-092-312-1, D12 Diesel Generator Slow Start Operability Test Run, Revision 103
Condition Reports
0379493
0381794
4081625
4094240
4103817
4104251
Work Orders
1382270
243506
255083
4595702
4699475
Miscellaneous
CGIFU01, EPRI CGI Joint Utility Task Group Commercial Grade Item Evaluation for UL 198E
Inspection Report 0101903
LIM-72331, Failure Analysis of Fuses, 12/27/17
Listed Fuses, 7/9/91
Procedures
ST-6-052-231-1, A Loop Core Spray Pump, Valve, and Flow Test, Revision 83
ST-6-052-232-1, B Loop Core Spray Pump, Valve, and Flow Test, Revision 74
Routine
Procedures
RT-6-051-320-1, B RHR Remote Operability Test, Revision 7
ST-2-074-642-1, Source Range and Intermediate Range Neutron Monitor Pre-Shutdown
Functional Test, Revision 8
ST-6-092-113-2, D23 Diesel Generator 24 Hour Endurance Test, Revision 43
Condition Reports
4116219
Containment Isolation Valve
Procedures
ST-4-LLR-031-1, Main Steam Line A, Revision 13
ST-4-LLR-041-1, Main Steam Line B, Revision 12
Work Orders
4309668
4310968
Procedures
RP-AA-600, Radioactive Material/Waste Shipments, Revision 16
RP-AA-600-1001, Exclusive Use and Emergency Response Information, Revision 9
RP-AA-600-1002, Highway Route Controlled Quantity/Advanced Notification for
Radioactive/Waste Shipments, Revision 6
RP-AA-600-1003, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Barnwell and the Defense Consolidation
Facility (DCF), Revision 10
RP-AA-600-1004, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Energy Solutions Clive Utah Disposal Site
Containerized Waste Facility, Revision 13
RP-AA-600-1005, Radioactive Material and Non Disposal Site Waste Shipments, Rev 19
RP-AA-600-1006, Shipment of Category 1 Quantities of Radioactive Material or Waste
(Category 1 RAMQC), Revision 11
RP-AA-600-1007, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Energy Solutions Clive Utah Disposal
Facility Bulk Waste Facility (BWF), Revision 8
RP-AA-600-1008, Radioactive Waste Shipments to Waste Control Specialists (WCS) Disposal
Facility, Revision 5
RP-AA-600-1009, Shipment of Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive Material or Waste
(Category 2 RAMQC), Revision 2
RP-AA-600-1010, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Creating Containers, Samples,
Waste Streams and Waste Types, Revision 2
RP-AA-600-1011, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Gross Gamma Characterization and
Generation of Shipping Paperwork, Revision 4
RP-AA-600-1012, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Direct Sample Characterization and
Generation of Shipping Paperwork, Revision 2
RP-AA-600-1014, Use and Operation of WMG Software Filter Module, Revision 2
RP-AA-600-1015, Use and Operation of WMG Software for Outage Service Module, Revision 3
RP-AA-600-1016, Use and Operation of the WMG Software for Characterization of
Miscellaneous Items, Revision 0
RP-AA-601, Surveying Radioactive Material Shipments, Revision 20
RP-AA-602, Packaging of Radioactive Material Shipments, Revision 20
RP-AA-602-1001, Packaging of Radioactive Material/Waste Shipments, Revision 17
RP-AA-602-1002, Loading Dry Active Waste and Other Waste Forms for Energy Solutions
Waste Acceptance Guide (WAG-501), Revision 0
RP-AA-602-1003, Radioactive Materials/Waste Shipments Transported Via Rail, Revision 1
RP-AA-603, Inspection and Loading of Radioactive Material Shipments, Rev 10
RP-AA-605, 10 CFR 61 Program, Revision 7
RP-AA-607, Radioactive Material Shipped in Accordance With IATA requirements, Revision 5
RW-AA-100, Process Control Program for Radioactive Wastes, Revision 12
RW-AA-605, 10 CFR 61 Program, Revision 7
Quality Assurance
NOSA-LIM-16-04, Chemistry, Radwaste, Effluent and Environmental Monitoring Audit Report
EnergySolutions Internal Audit CORP-16-004, Clive Facility
NUPIC 24365, EnergySolutions
NUPIC 24515, Waste Control Specialists, LLC
CFR Part 61 Scaling Factors
Waste Sludge Tank; Deep Bed; Dry Active Waste; Fuel Floor; Reactor Water Clean-Up
Condition Reports
3955208
28930
4085448
4092536
4092545
4092549
4092556
4092578
Training
RC-102, Use of WMG Programs and Regulatory Interface
RC-300, Transportation of Radioactive Material by Air
Shipments
MW-16-010; MW-16-045; MW-16-059; MW-17-006; MW-17-031
71151
Procedures
LS-AA-2200, Mitigating System Performance Index Data Acquisition and Reporting, Revision 5
NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7
Miscellaneous
MSPI Data
Operation Narrative Logs
Power History Graphs
Procedures
ARC-BOP-1BC514 C1, Lube Oil Temp High, Revision 1
ARC-BOP-2BC514 B2,
- J.W. Temp High, Revision 1
E-1, Loss of All AC Power (Station Blackout), Revision 51
E-1, Loss of All AC Power (Station Blackout), Revision 51
E-10/20, Loss of Offsite Power, Revision 56
E-10/20, Loss of Offsite Power, Revision 56
MA-AA-716-017, Station Rework Reduction Program, Revision 7
S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel Generators, Revision 73
S92.9.N, Routine Inspection of the Diesel Generators, Revision 74
ST-2-020-401-1, Electrical Power Systems 1BG501 Diesel Generator Critical and Non-Critical
Instruments Calibration / Functional Test, Revision 31
ST-6-092-112-1, D12 Diesel Generator 24 Hour Endurance Test, Revision 39
ST-6-092-312-1, D12 Diesel Generator Slow Start Operability Test Run, Revision 103
ST-6-092-316-1, D12 Diesel Generator Fast Start Operability Test Run, Revision 54
ST-6-092-362-2, D22 Diesel Generator Operability Verification, Revision 40
ST-6-092-362-2, D22 Diesel Generator Operability Verification, Revision 40
Condition Reports
1108417
22131
24515
21268
4049989
4062096
4069001
4070641
4073004
4081882
4082219
Work Orders
2075815
2079589
292476
4318057
4642785
4650838
4650858
4652385
4652410
4652412
4663824
4672813
4686262
4697246
Miscellaneous
ANSI/ASME B1.20.1, Pipe Threads, General Purpose (Inch), 1983
LIM-64785, Failure Analysis of a Threaded Pipe Nipple from Limerick Station, 12/5/2017
L-S-07, Diesel Generator and Auxiliary Systems, Revision 15
L-S-07, Diesel Generator and Auxiliary Systems, Revision 15
PES-S-006, Code Reconciliation, Revision 6