ML21130A080

0 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Appendix D(1), Figures

ML21130A080
Person / Time
Site:	Cooper
Issue date:	04/21/2021
From:	Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD)
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML21130A114	List: ML21130A062 ML21130A063 ML21130A064 ML21130A065 ML21130A066 ML21130A067 ML21130A068 ML21130A069 ML21130A070 ML21130A071 ML21130A072 ML21130A073 ML21130A074 ML21130A075 ML21130A076 ML21130A077 ML21130A078 ML21130A079 ML21130A080 ML21130A081 ML21130A082 ML21130A083 ML21130A084 ML21130A085 ML21130A086 ML21130A087 ML21130A088 ML21130A089 ML21130A090 ML21130A091 ML21130A092 ML21130A094 ML21130A095 ML21130A096 ML21130A097 ML21130A098 ML21130A099 ML21130A100 ML21130A101 ML21130A102 ML21130A103 ML21130A104 ML21130A105 ML21130A106 ML21130A107 ML21130A108 ML21130A110 ML21130A117 ML21130A118 ML21130A119 ... further results
References
NLS2021013
Download: ML21130A080 (48)

Text

~n~

0

~

~ 0 t:j t, ~ J..

3 ~(~

~~a I

~ ""'¢

..... ti ~

"I ::!.

-~""

0 ti ti 0 ~ :::t.

.i:,. 0 0

....... ~ ::::

\\D

\\D

~

~

t'I t::H':lz t/l O ~

> 0 O"

',i,j 'tf.,

t_,,,l t'I ~

..., ~ 5

~ z 'tf

> c:: =

zni::r

• t"'=

~:i t/l ~ ::ll

~ t/l ~

~"'"3t:,

t_,,,i>i;;*

'tf..., Q-O o ~-

~ z...

'2

[':

~

(

I WMAI PROJECT MANAGER I

I l

WMAI RESIDENT PROJECT ENGINEER I

I I L..

I SR/QA PROJECT MANAGER SR/QA DENVER STAFF r*-

NPPD GENERAL MANAGER NPPD NUCLEAR PROJECT AIMINISTRATOR I

NPPD PROJECT MANAGER NPPD SITE MANAGER I

I L

- *L-~r---~-~

---:-~---,---,. L*

__..----~-

WHAL/QA ASSISTANT PROJECT ENGINEER

('.BROWNVILLE)

INSPECTORS TESTING SR/QA SITE MANAGER (BROWNVILLE)

INSPECTORS SURVEY TESTING B&R ENGINEERING PROJECT

• MANAGER*

NPPD SITE REPRESENTATIVE B&R RESIDENT CONSTRUCTION MANAGER (BROWNVILLE)

ON-SITE CONTRACTORS I!

l r I

I f **

(

OFF-SITE CONTRACTORS

(.l

~

~

'.?:]

Cl

~- (")~

C "I

~ Cl K) t--. '15 ;::

V °"

I:)

"'I

~ ~--

Y;:: ~

~C'l:i,._

I

~ V'!I

..... I:)

to

"'I

,_ ti

-- ~*;:::

0 I:)

C'l o::::~

~§a

\\0

~

\\0 I:)

i

~

Cl

i

(

Cj

>i3 i:::,

~

l'"J t:::inz t'/l O (0

>O~

"':l ~.,

l'"J l'"J !:l

""3 ::i:i r;

-< z ~

>o=

Zn~

• t"'=

t"' l'"J n

-< > ;;?

t'/l ::i:i ~

~ t'/l ~

i:J""3t:,

l'"l * !i,*

~""3a Oon

i:lz....

""3

'2 t'/l >

~

(DENVER)

QA STAFF I

DOCUMENT TECHNICAL CONTROL DOCUMENT REVIEW I

VENDOR INSPECTION

~ GE APED

• V;,P. l'.l~R.*.. I*: '* '. {(

. POWER DIVISION.

I ASST. MGR~

POWER DIVISION

• -PROJECT EXE~I-VE

. I:"

I I

Q.A.

PROJECT MANAGER I

I SURVEY I

CIVIL STRUCTURAJ

- OTIIER VENDORS I

NPPD NUCLEAR PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR I

NPPD PROJECT MANAGER

. I I

I NPPD SITE MANAGER I

QA SITE B&R MANAGER CONSTRUC-(BROWNVILLE TION MGR.

I DOCUMENT ELECTRICAL CONTROL

\\

I I

CONCRETE MECHANICAL TEST I

WAREHOUSING

,oRM 11* <8>

PAGi;_ ___________ _

JOB NO, ___________ oA i:... ____________ ay _______ cH*, _______ _

cusTOMcR Nebraska Public Power Dist~ROJECT __

C_o_o~p~e~r~N~u_;.c~l~e~a~r.....;;S_t~a~t~i_o~n~-------

SUBJECT Document Review Log C:

0

~

~*

~

M u a,

~

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Document Review Log

.Figure D(J)-3-2 10/04/99

lllVISION uSJlGE

~N*JIPOr l,,'f-A IP I 1*1' ls11 Iv, lsP FE04.l Page 1 IX I. I I I Bnstne*rin.g Standard WELD PROCEDURE EVALUATION I S SUED REVISED Customer Project ________ _

Contract No.

S-R No.

Vendor -----------------------------------

Procedure No.

Rev. U Transmittal No, & Date ASME Section IX Edition and __________________ Codes

1. ___ Procedure is accepted w/o comment.

2. ___ Procedure is accepted as noted below.

Revised, corrected pro-cedure is to be resubmitted for record.

3. ___ Procedure is not acceptable due to deficiencies noted below.

Revised procedti're to be resubmitted for approval.

4

• COMMENTS.. _ --**. _

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

G.

H.

I.

___ All pages are not numbered and/or do not carry procedure number.

___ Q-1 form number does not agree with weld procedure specifica-tion number.

___ Q-1 form does not carry signature of authorized employee of manufacturer.

All welding processes used for qualification are not desig-nated or process designated is not used for this procedure qualification.

_ _,__ ASME, ASTM or other base metal specifications used are not specified or '.'P" number is incorrect.

___ ASME, ASTM or other filler metal specifications are not specified or are incorrect for base material used.

___ Group "F" number per ASME Section IX, Table Qll. 2, is not specified or is incorrect.

___ Chemical analysis "A" number per ASME Section IX, Table Qll.3, is not specified or is incorrect.

Flux for submerged arc welding not specified or incorrect.

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Weld Procedure Evaluation Figure D(J)-3-3 Page I of 2 10/04/99

[)f VI 'ii()!\\ US/bE

,.,A I,* I Pr ls11 h I lsr I xi I I I WELD PROCEDURE EV~UATION FE04.1 Page 2 ISSUED REV I SEO I

4.

COMMENTS (CONTD)

J.

K.

L.

M.

N.

o.

P.

Q.

R.

s.

T.

u.

Other Gas for inert-gas welding not specified, incorrect or incorrect flow range.

Position not properly specified or not in accordance with ASME Section IX.

Preheat not specified or incorrect for material used.

Postweld heat treat cycle not complete or temperatures incorrect.

Backing strip use or material not specified.

Thickness qualified not stated or incorrect per test material.

Preparation of base material improper for this process.

Defect repairs.not specified to a qualified procedure for the process designated.

Peening requirements omitted or incorrect.

Treatment of backside of double welded joints not specified or incorrect.

STEARNS-ROGER CORPORATION BY --------------

DATE ___________ _

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Weld Procedure Evaluation Figu,:e D(J)-3~3 Page 2 o/2 10/04/99

/

l'ORM 11-4 <(!>

PAG.._ ___________ _

JOB NO ___________ OA _____________ 9y _______ CH'.,._ ______ _

CUSTOMER Nebraska Public Power DistPROJECT Cooper Nuclear Station SUBJECT Purchase Order and Mill Test Report Status Cll

..i

~

i

~

~

I c.;,

Cll

..i 113

..i Cl.I 1M Cll oe

• a, o..i ZH ell

..i a, :i

i;:::, z a, -

o.c ZIC

~~

C:.-4 u

~

rn~

(/]~

~'"'

0 Cll i

..i i

113..,

Cl.I

~

I a,

~

g:

Cl.I Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION I

UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR) 0 z 0

Purchase Order and Mill Test Report Status Figure D(J)-3-4 10/04/99

• !"L

' \\~

-~-

Form CNS -

20Zl2 Page 1

of __ 5 SHOP INSPECTION OF REACTOR FEED PUMP TURBINES A.

Reference Documents B.

1.

Nebraska Public Power District Contract E68-13 and Addendum No. 1 and Amendments No. 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Reactor Feed Pump Turbines

2.

Codes and Standards incorporated by reference a)

ASTM - A27; A48; A201; A216; A217; A276; A293; A296; A285; B23; Bl49 b)

AISI - Type 410; Type 422 c)

ASME d)

AISC e)

AWS f)

NEMA g)

NEC-h)

IEEE i)

NBFU j)

Hydraulics Institute k)

State of Nebraska local codes and regulations

1)

Uniform Building Code - International Conference of Building Officials Document Reference for Q. A. Checks

1.

Turbine F"eatures a)

General Requirements - Pg. G-9, Para. 3.1, subpara. a, sub-subpara. 1, 2 and 3.

b)

Casing, Lagging and Blading - Pg. G-9, Para. 3.1, subpara.

b, sub-subpara. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

c)

Stop Valves - Pgs. G-9 and G-10, Para. 3.1, subpara. c.

d)

Governing Devices - Pg. G-10, Para. 3.1, subpara. d, sub-subpara. 1, 2 and 3. -

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Shop Inspection Check/"ist - Example:

Shop Inspection of Reactor Feed Pump Turbines Figure D(l)-3-5 Page I of 5 *. 10/04/99

(* \\,_,,

(.

'-~

B.

Form CNS -

20Zl2 Page 2

of ___ s __

Document Reference for Q. A. Checks (cont'd) e)

Pro tecttve*Be-.I.ces.-1c= P-g..=.-* lO:;i:* Para.-.*.* 3 d::r~:sub-para.--,*.e;,.. sub:-

subpara. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

f)

Lubrication System - Pgs. G-10 and G-11, Para. 3.1, subpara.

f, sub-subpara. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8.

g)

Steam Sealing System -

Pg. G-11, Para. 3.1, subpara. g.

h) i)

Turning Gear -

Pg. G-11, Para.

Instrumentation and Controls -

3.1, subpara. i, sub-subpara.

10, 11, 12 and 13.

3. 1, subpara. h.

Pgs. G-12 and G-13, Para.

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, j)

Soles Plates - Pg. G-13, Para. 3.1, subpara. j.

k)

Materials and Workmanship - Pg. G-13, Para. 3.2, subpara.

a, b, c and d.

1)

Painting and Protection - Pgs. G-13 and G-14, Para. 3. 3.

m)

Elec-tric.ahlRequi't'.-eriiem:s-.-r:~~"""--,G-i..-'!:-,.,-and~~i:&,:..Pa:ra.. :-: *3~i:4.,~

subpara. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i and j, sub-subpara. l and 2.

n)

Shop Tests - Pg. G-15 and G-16, Para. 3.5, subpara. a, sub-subpara. i, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

o)

Conformed Data Sheets - Pgs. G-19 thru G-23, Para. l.*O; l.l; 1.2; 1.3; 1.4; 1.5; 1.6; 1.7; 1.8; 1.9; 1.10; 1.11; 1.12; 1.13; 1.14; 1.15; 1.16 and l.17~

p)

Contractors Drawing Submittal DeLaval Turbine Incorporated q)

Drawing No. CC-90946 *

• Latest Revision Drawing No. *cc-90945 Latest Revision.,

Drawing No. CC-90943 Latest Revision Drawing No. so-704564-5 Latest Revision Drawing No. CCA-1788 Latest Revision Drawing No. H-38_32 Latest Revision Drawing No. F'.-8736 Latest Revision Drawing No. D-60234 Latest Revision Drawing No. D-60232 Latest Revision Other Applicable Data - DeLavel Alternate Proposal, T-2001 Telegrams,* May 23 and 24, 1968 and CPPD letter of June 26, 1968 and DeLavel letter of May 24, 1968 - attached to contract documents.

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Shop Inspection Checklist - Example:

Shop Inspection of Reactor Feed Pump Turbines Figure D(l)-3-5 Page 2 of 5 10/04/99

(\\...,,;

c.

Form CNS -

20Zl2 Page 3

of __ s;;,_ __

Rejectable Criteria A check mark under "No" for any item in check list CNS -

20Zl2.

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Shop Inspection Checklist - Example:

Shop Inspection of Reactor Feed Pump Turbines Figure D(.1)-3-5 Pqge 3 of 5 10/04/99

~

'.ll-§ 0q* ::i" ~

.:: "' ::t-

~ '1::l.g t, ~,__,

7'. :::-

t

..._ c*~

'i'::i~

y,~ a

,._,, ::-, o*

~ ::I "1::, ti,..._

ti a ::s::

()<:j C

~

-~

"'I C')

~

-I>..~ --

-~ ~;:;.

,._,, s:i_

I

p ~

..... SI ti 0 'ti..§ 25"

~ ~ 1i,

....... "'I

'° ~

'° ;.;*

~

d

~

t,:l t:::H"Lz Cll O to

> 0 O" 1-.:l "ti.,

t,:l t,:l !;;

'"3 ::,::, 5

><: z "ti

> d =

z n O"

> t"' ~

t"' t,:l "ti

><: > 0 Cll ::,::, ::I!

rn Cll ~

,::, '"3 0 t,:l>t;;*

"ti '"3 ::t 0 0 ~-

,::,z....

'"3

'2

~

(

(

Form CNS -

20Zl2 Page 4

of 5

CHECK LIST FOR SHOP INSPECTION OF REACTOR FEED PUMP TURBINES Location of. Shop -------------------------------------

1.

General Requirements per reference B.l.a

2.

Casing, Lagging and Blading per reference B.l.b

3.

Stop Valves per reference B.l.c

4.

Governing Devices per reference B.l.d

5.

Protective Devices per reference B. 1. e

6.

Lubrication System per reference B.l.f

7.

8.

9.

Steam Sealing System per reference B.l.g Turning Gear per.reference B.l.h Instrumentation and Controls per reference B.l.i Sole Plates per.reference B.l.j

~

10.

11.

12.

13.

Materi'als and Workmanship per reference B. l. k __

Painting and Protection per reference B.1.1 Electrical Requirements per reference B.l.rn No Not Applicable Inspector Date

(,~

<U...

<"CJ Q

~

0 N

..4 N

~

0 N

Q E-<

I ll"I z

0 C/l u

z u

Cl.I e

<U

~

oO 0

C1l H

~ p..

~

ui E-<

~

0....

0.4 z,....

Q w

w I:"<

0:::

0 JEI E-<

c., <

~

I:"<

~,

0 z

0 1-(

h c.,;.

w P-1 C/l z 1-(

P-1 0

i:::

C/l

~

E-<

C/l 1-(

..:l

0.

c.,

0.a

~

C/l u

'4-1

• o c::

0....

.u re, (J

.0

..:l CIJ (J

c::

c::

CIJ M

CIJ 1:0

'4-1 CIJ CIJ M

tJ c::

M CIJ CIJ M

0.

CIJ

'4-1 CIJ ca M

.u

.u 1-4 CIJ e

0.

.c Ul C/l

.u CIJ 00

. *(II c::

.a C/l

~

ca re,

).a

.u Q

ft!

Q CQ,...

-0 0

<II

.u E

(J re, 0

• 1-4 0.

~

.u.

c::

c::.....

0 0.

u c., 1:0

-:t

~

~

O".

1:0 CIJ (J

c::

CIJ M

CIJ

~

<II M

M CIJ

0.

ca

.u

~

(II

,-f

.0 Ill (J

0.

0.

1-4 (I).a

.u 0

'° c.o

.u c:: I 0

<:.:)

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Shop Inspection Checklist - Example:

Shop Inspection of Reactor Feed Pump Turbines Figure [)(1)-3-5 Page 5 -of 5

• 10/04/99

IHSPECTIOH E XPEDITIHG

'OPINtf P.O. No.

ltem(a)

Datt I

Vendor No.

,s. tt Hepr... ntatlve

• Acldreu Pa. 1 nf Contacts w/Title: -----------------------------------------

De Ii very Promise: ________________________________________ _

NARRATIVE REPORT

. Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Inspection and Expediting Narrative Report Figure D(J)-3-6 10/04/99

---

-- ---~u,;arns*p. --~ *- -**- -----*-- * -- -

(

COR.,ORATION

[

COOPER NUCLE :...._ __ ~fATION

)ate INSPECTION PUNci1 LIST REPORT

[nspector Distribution:

Stearns-Roger QA - Original+ 3 Burns & I}oe CM

- 1

\\pproved Contractor

- 2 NPPD (Site)

- 2 1

I Item of Work To Be Corrected 1, If "Acceptable".- state reasons.

REMARKS:

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Inspection Punch List Report Figure D(l)-3-7 10/04/99

(

Page:

Contract No:

Contractor:

Location:

Description*

Disposition, If Required Correct Date

• Acceptable Date

~~~ ' -. _

11~:aw-,.;*

--~

COOPER NUCLEAR~

TON Conti.*act No:

Date:l_

DEVIATION RE!.

Contractor:

(

Inspector:

Distribution:

S-R Q.A. - Original+ 3 Location:

NPPD - 2 Approved:

B&R, CM & Eng. - 2 Dwg. No.:

Rev. No.:

Contractor - 2 Spec. Pg. No.:

ppg.

Site Management Accepted DEVIATION Disposition Rework Acceptable S-R Inspector Date As Is

\\

e

~

t:I >

-,l i:,:,

~

t:I ("'.) z Cll O ~

> 0 O" i;::

":l~..,

~ t, i:,:, I:>:!~

t, ~

~ ::o r

-:---.-. * ~:

.:::: a I

z ("'.) O" v.,C

> t"' i;-

I Oo ::,:,

t"'l':I~

-< > 0

~

Cll :,0 ~

.... C riJ Cll ~

S2::t

ti -,l t:I 0

i:,:,

• t;;*

.l'>, ;a

~-,ls:

'° 0 0 n*

0 z -

-,l

'2 Cll >

-ES

. ____, ___ --**--*------*----***-~-

i (\\...

CONTRACT NO.

DEVIATION REPORT LOG CONTRACTOR'---------------~'--

LOCATION ---------------- -

SHEET NO.

D.R. NO. I DESCRill'lON I

DA'l'E I INITIATED I DA_ TE I ACCl-:l'TJ*;

INITIATED BY

£CCEPTED r BY J

1 :

I

• • i I

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION I

UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Deviation Report Log I

Figure D(l)-3-9 10/04/99 I

I.

COOPER NUCLEAR STATION CONTRACTOR: ______________ _

CONCRETE PLACEMENT CHECKOUT SHEET Pour Description _____________________ _

Date _______ _

Pour No. and Location ___________________ _

Contract No. ___ _

CONTRACTOR CHECKOUT QUALITY ASSURANCE CHECKOUT Item Representative Date Item Representative Date Carp. Fore.

Fonns & B lockouts Lab. Fore.

Cleanuo Resteel Resteel Struct. Steel Struct. Steel&Bolts Xechanical Pipin~

Electrical Elec. Installation Engineer Suot.

,o,,1*

Line & Grade Embedded Ttems Anchor Bolts & Sleeves Weather Protection STEARNS-ROGER CORP.

BURNS AND ROE, INC, QUALITY ASSURANCE _____________ CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT--------

(ALL ABOVE ITEMS MUST BE SIGNED OFF WHEN APPLICABLE)

CONCRETE PLANT NOTIFIED:

DATE ______ TJME ____ _

SITE MANAGEMENT NOTIFIED:

DATE TlME-----

INSPECTOR NOTIFIED:

DATE TIME-----

P.OUR STARTED:

DATE TlME-----

POt.JR COMPLETED:

DATE TlME-----

CLASS OF CONCRETE:-*------------

CUBIC YARDS ESTil1ATED: _________ _

CUBIC YARDS PLACED:------------

WEATHER CONDITIONS:-.------------

DISTRIBUTION:

.,,NPPD BURNS & ROE S-R, Q.A.

BATCH PI.ANT BLOUNT BROS.

(2 copies)

(2 copies)

(2 copies)

(1 copy)

(2 copies)

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Concrete Placement Checkout Sheet Figure D(J)-3-10 10/04/99

QUALITY ASSURANCE NPPD -

COOPER NUCLEAR STATION CONTRACT NO: -----

PIPE BACKFILL TICKET DATE INSPECTOR;__ ____________ _

GRADE &

INTER.i.'l'AL

!DENT.

LINE CLEANING t{DT COATING COMMENT CONT.

Q.A.

CONT.

Q.A.

CONT.

Q.A.

I CONT. I Q.A.

~:

-- ---*--~

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

SUE XANAGEt1ENT Pipe Backfill Ticket Figure D(l)-3-11 10/04/99

(

(

Page

{

of ---

COOPER NUCLEAR STATION ELECTRICAL INSTALIATION CHECK OFF LIST Contract __________________ Contractor Description-----,----------------------------------------~-----

System

• Location ------'-------------------

Manufacturer P. 0.

D n

h

1.

Identification Nameplate Tag Data Mill Number

2.

Routing Trav Conduit Other

3.

Termination Identification Tags I

~

Continuitv

'tl

~

I

~

~

4.

t"'l

~a t::H":l z (IQ' "Ii tl.l O ~

n*

>Oi::r

~ e..

~; I

5.

t, :i'

~ ::0 5 2s

< z 'tl I

>~=

t.,,i5"

zni::r I

• t"'~ I 6.

t-v §

~ t"'l 'tl

\\J tl.l ~ 0

11

..... ::s,..

Cl.! Cl.!~

0""

c5 0

o~o I

7.

t"'l>!ii'

~~

'tl.., s:

'°~ Oo

• t--,

0 z !l.

c:;*

~

Grounding I

Insulation Per Drawing/Spec~

ification Test I,*

Supports Recorcts Contractor's Qualitv Control

'2 I

Cl.! >

~

NS*L4

('-,.

Truck No.

-('-'

~

CONCRETE BATCH PLANT INSPECTION REPORT DATE: ___________ _ CLASS:---------

CONTRACT:---------

WEATHER: _______________________ INSPECTOR: ________ _

MIX DESIGN Cement:

Sand: (ssd) 3/4" Rock: (ssd) 11/2" Rock: (ssd)

Admixture:

Admixture:

Design Water:

Plant Time In Out

____ no., ____ sks

_____ no.

_____ no.

no.

---

oz.

_______ oz. ___ _

_____ gal.

Ticket Vo~

Cement No.

yd lb.

-- --- - **--* *---:----;:-. 1-,-......... -

Mo: ____ %

Mo:

Mo:

Sand lb.

WEIGHTS PER YD Agg.

Excess Water

______ lb. ____ lb. ___ gal

---

lb.

lb.

gal

______ lb.

lb.

gal

______ gal Total Water: ____ gal/yd 3/4" Rock 11/2" Rock Adm.

Adm.

lb.

lb.

oz.

oz.

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION Water gal.

i I I I

UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Concrete Batch Plant Inspection Report Figure D(l)-3-13 10/04/99

CNS-L5

(\\....,

LAB. WORK SHEET AND FILE TIME: __________ _

DATE: __________ _

SAMPLE LOCATION: _______________ _

MATERIAL: SAND WET WT. + TARE DRY WT.+ TARE

_______ x 100 =

TIME: __________ _

DATE: __________ _

r,:

DRY WT.+ TARE TARE Moisture In Sand SAMPLE LOCATION: ______________ _

(~ MATERIAL:--:314" ROCK WETWT.+TARE DRYWT.+TARE DRYWT.+TARE ______

TARE

_______ x 100=

.. 7 Moisture In Rock TIME: __________ _

DATE: __________ _

SAMPLE LOCATION: ______________ _

MATERIAL: 11/2" ROCK WET WT.+ TARE DRY WT.+ TARE

_______ x100=

.* 7 DRY WT.+ TARE TARE Moisture in Rock Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Lab Work Sheet and File Figure D(l)-3-] 4 I 0/04/99

CNS*L9 NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT Cooper Nuclear Station Project Laboratory Lab No.: ________ _

LAB DATA Material: ____________________ Date Sampled: ___________ _

Mark: _____________________ Time Sampled: __________ _

Sampled by: ___________ _

Sample Source: __________________________________ _

Weight Acc.

Sieve Ret:

Retained Ret.

2" 11/2" 1"

3/4" 3/8"

1. 4

1. 8

1. 16

1. 30

1. 50

1. 100

1. 200 Pan Total Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Lab Data Figure D(J)-3-15 10/04/99 Specs Initial Wet Wt:

Initial Dry Wt:

Diff:

Moisture:

Initial Dry Sample Wt.:

Dry Wt. After

(# 200) Wash:

Oiff:

Loss:

• Remarks:

Date:

Lab. Technician Tested by: ______ _

Lab.Technician Cale. by: ______ _

Lab. Technician Checked by:------

Lab. Manager Approved by: _____ _

CNS-L3 TIME TICKET NO.

\\

}

I NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT COOPER NUCLEAR STATION PROJECT LABORATORY CONCRETE FIELD INSPECTION REPORT SLUMP AIR TEMP.

BATCH JOB YDS.

WATER WATER Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Concrete Field Inspection Report Figure D(J)-3-16 10/04/99 DATE: _____________ _

CLASS: _____________ _

LOCATION: ___________ _

REMARKS INSF REVIEWED BY:

REVIEWED BY:

I'-'

(_'-"

CNS*Ll NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT Class:

Mark:

Ticket No.:

Sample Source:

Spec. Strength:

Water Added Job:

Batch Volume:

Remarks:

Test Date Age (Days)

Cooper Nuclear Station Project Laboratory Lab No.:

LAB FIELD DATA Material:

Date Sampled:

By:

Contract:

Time:

Slump:

inch 1 Total Load

(#)

gals.

Wet Wt:

cf Air:

Compressive Tested Strength (psi) by:

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Lab Field Data Figure D{l)-3-17 10/04/99

CNS-LS NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT Cooper Nuclear Station Project Laboratory COMPRESSION TEST OF CONCRETE

• Lab No: _______ _

Report Date: ______ _

Class: _________ _ Contract No.: _____________ Ticket No.: _________ _

Date Sampled: __________ Sampled By: ___________ Time: ________ _

Source:------------------------------------------

MIX DATA CEMENT:

---

LBS SAND:

3/4" ROCK

---

LBS MO: ______ %*

---

LBS MO:

11/2"ROCK:

---

LBS MO: ______ %*

,.l'.'IMIXTURE: ------ OZ "IXTURE: ______ oz l~TER:.s~D BATCH WATER:

BATCH:

____ yi)5 ADO JOB WATER:-------

AGG. WATER:

TOTAL WATER:

COMPRESSION TEST 70AY 28DAY Max. Lciad Comp.

Max. Load Comp.

lbs.

Strength lbs.

Strength (psi)

(psi)

I

-"'* Aggregate weights saturated surface dry.

Moisture excess over saturated surface dry.

Nebraska Public Power District CONCRETE PROPERTIES SLUMP:

---

INCH WET WEIGHT/CUBIC FOOT:

---

PCF AIR CONTENT:

NOMINAL CEMENT FACTOR:

SKS/YO ACTUAL CEMENT FACTOR:

SKS/YO WATER/CEMENTRATJ.Q.:....*. - -~.,-....------ GAL/YD REMARKS: _______________

DAY

.Max. Load Comp.

lbs.

Strength (psi)

Specified 28 Day Strength (psi)

Project Laboratory COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

By: ______ --'------

Lab. Manager Compression Test of Concrete Figure D(l)-3-18

• 10/04/~9

!) t,

~ C

(")

iil ;:

t, ~

-::::~

'--' ::i

~~

I C

..... :::i

'O >.:,

~

>t:l 0 ~-

c3 ::!

.j::,.~

........ :::i

~c:,-

't Contract No.

\\

COOPER NUCLBAR STATION DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS Description ______________ _

P. O. No. _________ Checked By ______________ _

Supplier-----------------------

Cert tert Mfr's MTR Compl PT MT UT RT Hydro.Leak Rep' t Item R A. R A RA R AR A RA RA R A RA cj.,,

~

o-'l t"l on '.2!

tl.l O (0

> 0 C"

"':l.,,.,

t"l t"l' o-'l ::i:,5

-<'.;ii!.,,

> cj =

'.;ii! (":) C"

> t"" if-

~~~

tl.l ::i:, ::!

v.l tl.l i;

i:,o-'lo t"l>i;;-

.,, o-'l 3:

Oot>*

i:,z-o-'l

'2 tl.l >

,ES Contractor Sheet No.

Issue Date

(

Date --------

R : Required A: Accomplished No Certs Req 1d Additional Requirements and Comments

COOPER NUCLEAR STATION DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS (ELECTRICAL)

Sheet No.

Issue Date Contract No. ____ _

Description ---------------

Contractor ______ _

P. 0. No. ______ _

Prepared By ______________ _

Supplier --------

Insert Specific requirement number in ColUIIlll Rand note accomJlishment in A.

Item Identification R A R A R A R A R A R A R A R A R A B A Comments Legend of Document Requirement Numbers:

1.

Cert of Compliance (Mfg. and testing)

2.

Cert of Compliance (Materials)*

3.

Dielectric Test Reports 4..

Continuity Test Reports S.

Radiation Service Certifications

6.

Standard Shop Test Reports

7.

Functional Check Reports

8.

Calibration Data

9.

Instruction Books Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPJ;>ATE~ SAFETY.ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Documentation Requirements (Electrical)

Figure D(J)-3-20 10/04/99

10.

Other requirements (list each and assign sequential numbers)

-1 ~JEGT cSUlOE-L E:G E:t-J D :

___ ! ACTIOtJ6 0%2 F-UNCTIO>-J~

0 E:J.JTl11E:."'.;)

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Organization Flow Chart Figure D(l)-4-1 10/04/99

r ENGINEERING STANDARDS DESIGN CRITERIA*~----*;.

AND QUALITY CONTROL

..------~'ENGINEERING AND DESIGN:1---------,

SPECIFICATIONS I BID PACKAGE PROCUREMENT BY NPP:O BID SUBMITTAL AND EVALUATION I BID DRAWINGS

,------------4 CONTRACT AWARDi--------,

BY NPPD APPROVED DRAWINGS "AS-BUILT" INFORMATION AND DRAWINGS Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Engineering and Design Flow Chart Figure D(l)-4-2 10/04/99

-J.

ol/'I

'2.

J)

.no r~

ill

-~'-J I-

~,J\\

i,:2 I-IL '2

-..>::i 2

Q 0

,du.

UJ

,J\\-

1111-

~ 0 0 c?;1j

z~~

~gM

~i 2

()

i=-

-4

~

'= u *

'5)

z

\\))-

0

z

~

0 v

~

LL

_J v

0 iJJ

_I Q_

-<l

\\))

v 0.u Cf_

5

~

ct "I:

,(\\

tU "2

i!J J

()

1.

Li:

fr

~

I-Ill u

u cl LIi

&lJ Cl

'J:

~

0 u

\\.J Q.

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Specifications and Calculations Flow Chart Figure D(])-4-3 10/04/99

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Drawings Flow Chart Figure D(l)-4-4 10/04/99

a\\l\\

o::z II\\ Q 0

z 1--

ou 2

j:::Z tlJ

\\.)::J G

-<t IL w

D

_J a

,u

}-

0.

0 lJ

\\l\\

w I-

-:2 w

0 1--

~

.u~

..J--.:i ii 8 d) w

.J u_

(J

z Q

ex

~

Cl 0..

0 lJ Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Vendor and As-Built Drawings Flow Chart Figure D(l)-4-5 10/04/99

Cj C)

"'= ti

~ Otj C) l:)

~

C) t"'l

~ ~*

ti ("'.! z Isl

~K:) l:) ~

Ill O ~

> 0 O"

~-§it g

""l "'= '1

~.Wto t"'l t"'l ~

~ := 5 tl:t,.g ~ i<z"'=

~

Co "l ~

> C: =

'ri=~,

z ("'.! 51:

...,,i:l.:: (")

> t"' ;;*

Co C) t"' t"'l "'=

C)

(Is C)

--< > 0 (Is Rsi~

Ill i= ~

-"-:,:t,."l rn Ill ~

!;:tio.:;:,;:

= ~ ti 0~ Co.::

t"'l>!ii*

C)

C)

\\0 Ci ::l. ii,'

"'= ~ 3:

\\0 ::!

l:)

l:)

0 0 r,*

~ "l

= z.....

~~

~

l:)

'2

~ §"*

Ill c!

LABORATORY SUPERVISOR LABORATORY TECHNICIANS PROJECT I

MANAGER I

I

~.-

I I

RESIDENT PROJECT ENGINEER I

I ASSISTANT PROJECT ENGINEER (BROWNVILLE)

DEWATERING INSP.

ENGINEER DEWATER ING TECHNICIANS NPPD NUCLEAR PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR I

H EARTHWORK INSPECTOR EARTHWORK TECHNICIANS I

I I

I NPPD PROJECT MANAGER NPPD SITE MANAGER I NPPD SITE REPRESENTATIVE I

SECRETARY

I I

I Sample obtained from in-place density test j Sample identified according to area, date, and consecutive sample number I Sample transported to laboratory with field density test results and entered in log book I Sample weighed and visually classified I Sample oven-dried at 105°C 24 hrs for cohesive soil and 3 hrs for cohesionless soil and weighed I In-place dry unit weight and water content calculated I I

I I COHESIVE SOIL I I COHESIONLESS SOIL I I

l Determine percent fines and liquid Determine maximum and minimum dry and plastic limits unit weights*

I I

~alculate degree of compaction using Calculate relative density reference compaction curves I

I Results checked & reported to Assistant Project Engineer I I

I Test results meeting specifications Test results not meeting specifica-summarized and filed tions reported to project engineer I

Addit.ional coverages *of compaction requested in the field or construe-tion *Management informed of the need for corrective measures

• Vibratory table used for the determination of th2 maximum dry unit weight; every tenth determination was repeated for reproducibility check; and approx every tenth sample used to determine the maximum dry unit weight according to the "Basic" method.

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Flow Diagram of Laboratory Phase of Quality Control Testing of Structural and General Fills Figure D(J)-5-2 10/04/99 j

• -§ 0

~ -

~

I I

)

("

)

(

0

<l

-f\\\\i

,. C:

.!._g u

r

... 0

~:,.

ii:~

0 0

<l

<lo r=-=-

<b

<l 0

0 C:

C:

• i -~

• u ti

• l:J l:J -

Q.

~ ~

g 8 ~

.2 ~

i=

-~

g...

~

.5:

~~

....£:

E 0...

~

0

... l:J 0

• o

~a:

It

~

~ e :t:; t-~

• a

~ ::: -~ :.:: ] *~t

'<tlll<..>~;Q.~

0::,

I I

I o

~

i::,*...

C: 'ti

"""Q.Q_:,.::,

Q.Q.A,e:isi~

8 c;

(.)

co 8

~~~~Cl:X:Q::...

I I I I

0 * * * <l X I

I I

I I

0

<l 0

~

0 l:J

~

~

!~

Q

(.)

• - l:J

t:;

'f' I

l:J

.!:, (.)

't ~...

0 c:: -~

~ 2

g~

C:...

~....

~ l:J

~o :c:.~

" E..

&~

~~

~ ti l:J...

....q

,. l:J

'<t E Cf) l:J

~

I()

<ti 0

0 0,

,!: A C:

,S! 1

... i 0

~

0..,

(/)

0 0

0 Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Locations of Piezometers, Heave Points, Deep Wells, Verification Borings, and In-Situ Compaction and Structural Fill Construction Areas Figure D(I)-5-3 I 0/04/99

0

<X)

~ <X)

(1) e

-g..

iii 0

C:

2 u

vi C:

0 u 0

• - u

".' 8.

c: E

-o u

C 0

0 8

l.LJ

./

I I

{

\\

\\

0 f'-

<X)

/

/

/

(

I I

I I

I I

"O...

c::~

i Q)

C: § N

4>

4) *-

> C.

~i

... Q.

/

4>.,...

N o... ~

r; E

-0 ::i g~

/

C) Ill

/

/

0 U)

<X) 0 U")

<X)

.5 -...

4) 4)

E 0

t t o*a.

~ al C:

i

4) 0 C.

C) I-0

'll;f"

<X) 0

(\\I

<X) cu C

.... a.

<(

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Results oJObse,vations of Excavation and Groun_dwater Levels in Reactor Building Area Figure D(l)-5-4 I 0/04/99

~

0...

a

(/)

C:

Q)

-0 Q) 0 Q) 0::

.c -

z Cl)

(.)

C 0 -

(/)

• en Q)...

C 0 -

0... -

Cl)

C:

Q.)

0.

-0...

0

-0 C:

0 -

CJ) 0 0

0 Cl) 0 I.D

__ tt_

s *

~+----~-----r--------.-------

0 0

.1!:?

<D 0

3: §_1 0

Q)

CIQ)

Q) 0 g

I.D Q)

~

0 s::t I

I

• 0 C\\J 0

0

(\\J

~

U 's1 !OS ni!S-U!

Cl) 0

-c~

\\

CD CD It) g';.!::r---

• V"..

a:: Q I.D

}O a:>o}*J ns

<D 0

Mo1aq 4idaa Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Results of Standard Penetration Tests and Calculated Relative Densities of In-Situ Compacted Material

• Figure D(l)-5-5 10/04199

- I I

IO I

l 1

I

~

i I

I I

I l

I i

I JO

. I

' I I

~ C t

i +

' I i

I.

I U &. 11T AHOAIIO &II: V[.. Z.C

-llN HO.*

HO. IO HO.00 Z()O I

4 T

I ii,,-

Ii I l, i T I I l

--l I

t-*

-4 Ii I,:-::: ::..::: ~

~. ~-

t- -

I'

~

11 11 I

i I:

I I

~

i--,

I*

I

-+.-

11 f-111 RepresentatVe 5rain-size ___

I

'-I~, l i d1"Str1but.1on eo1.1rve5 l'or sand_

.l ii I

I, "N

~\\11 l

lf'rom main ~xcavat,on r.t 11

-rr---

I

\\ \\

r1 ;-r*i--

n t -

f -*-

I t-

I j I

~~

_J _..,;i\\ I

• • 1.*,..... !.

I

• !-'-- t--

,-..t-

_J__

I

, I, I I' I

i )ij I

- t-I I

I

T

, I l 1-I'

'\\

l~t-r-*-

I -t

. -.... ~I*

.. i I

. Ii

\\

i I

I; I

~

1--

I I I

1 I

\\

~

• ~' I I

IL nt

. -* i Ii* t I

I

-r-

• r-

--4--

i I

I l

,I I.,

\\

I fl I

+--**-+--m...... _

~

-ff.

I

~-1 -L1-f * --

I II I.

i I I l

. ' * - : 11 I *-

. :i*

--+

i I

I ~

, I i;

\\H

'.!. I

. -+.----

7 *. I I

I I 1' i j**+

I I

~,

11 j

li

\\ \\' \\\\

1 ;

I I

i I

I I I I

II I

II I \\' ~

I,'; I

-f-l-li I

~

!11 I' I

Ii I

~\\~

, : I i

JL ___ hµ l:

I I

i~ ~: !

I I!

I I

I l r

"-,; ~II I'

I I

I i I 10 10

.c E

z 75 85 100 125 150 175 Relative Density, Dr0/o Between el 830 and 855 Average Dr required =80%

Minimum Dr required =75%

200 o~;i_-~;i......,1--'--"L...-1~-4--1.--L--'--'-~--L.....J-..1-...L-..------,-----,

50 7580 IOO 125 150 175 200 Relative Density, Dr 0/o Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Histograms of Relative Density Values Obtained in Structural Fill Figure D(l)-5-9 10/04/99

(\\J --

~ -

Cl)...

ta Cl)...

0..

0

(..) -

Cl) >

Cl) u Cl) --

w Standard penetration resistance N, blows/ft 0

50 100 150 200 250 o _______ __,_ _____..__ ____________..__ ____ _.

2 3

4 5

6 7

8

()

0~

0

()

0 0

S tondord penetrot ion fest perfonned in 0 In-situ compacted material and strucnxol fill below el 830

() Structure I fi 11 between el 830 and el 855 e"Structural fill above el 855 Avera<;1e relative density required3/4 75 80 65

()

0 0

()

().

()

()It 0

0

()

()

()

()

()

0

()

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Results of Standard Penetration Tests in Structural Fill Figure D(l)-5-10 10/04/99

N~

MISSOURI RIVER FLOW----*

APPROX. SHORELINE Jr~

,) I~"'

(" J

"""42A(BS.9) *

\\'1!0..Q.N.l-

______::;:,.__o.,_

1==--1--1 -~--..::::;.,-~ t ~

-==

---m

~A(88()_7)<~52.9)

- as2::::-,,,,kiis~Na:

1~

< I --------

I Q

tq,,

0

~ \\

4

55

(

7 CONffl<X..

1

R0O,

)

853-._

TURBINE-GENERATOR BUILDING

- ~

048Al8542) 025A 102A(~'.0 ~3,l(~t r---------... ~\\ ;J

~IA(855.4l0 I RAOWASTE

~

.g

~~

31 ~ ~

~

-. 0

~

s::

~

't ~

~ ~ 't t,,,... ~

• 7' ~ S'

~.-..:::::

I C)' 0 1' ;:i:

..... c,,

~

I

~~

o;:; ~

6 ~ ~

..,. l.y ~

0*

..... Q

\\0.........

'o c:,

'-1 §

-C:::,~

~

~

't e

"O

~

teeJ t:H"lz tll O ~

> 0 Sf

""J "O II) teeJ teeJ"'

>-'l ::i::, ~

~Z"'CJ

>e=

z ("l i:r

> t"' iir t"' teeJ "O

.._,: > j

!a ::i::, ~

tll tll.,

=:, >-'l i::,

teeJ>i;,*

"O >-'l ::t 0......i.

i::, 0~

.., z i

~

BUILDING QJJ6Al880.3l

()mA Olo7A A

0

• A

6.

,-"V',._A, LEGEND Deep well backfifted and covered with fill.

Type A piezorneter TerTWOry piezometer

~~ wen opercrt,ng Deec w,-11 ac-t ope.-ating Sheetpile Cllloff WOii Collector e11pe

---

.70 indicates J:s~nD:-J f'~-N g()! /m:n

-845-Grrunctwo!13:r 1:on1ovr r:h?*.-,:1*c.n Nores-(1} Conrours were interpreted 01-: I t"ti-. br.*s1~ o! w.:::!tet

eve! elevations meosi.;red w*th,n be s1..:i:etr,:1-~

cutoff wall.

(2)Deep wells W34 and W35 have two pumps operoffng.

{3)Deep wells W 18,W28,W31,W36 and W37 hove one pump operating,

{4)Rlver' elevation 881.1 at 0800 hrs.

{5)Total discharge rate from cellular cofferdam and plart bowl 422 gal/min.

(877.510{6) Deep well caslngW8 is capped and covered with fifl.

m Groundwater level measurements could not be made in piezometers 2A, 13A, 25A,33A,39A,44A, 49A, 1051\\ and 107A because of damaqe 1o the risers.

)

(S)Number adjacent to deep well symbolls deep well number.

{9) Numbers adjacent to plezometer symbols are piezometer numbers and groundwater levels, respectively.

Scale I in.= I00f I.

Cootour Interval= 1ft.

(/)

Q)

C:

15

~ 10 0 -

0...

Q) e 5

, z COHESIONLESS GENERAL Fl LL Minimum Dr required= 65%

o-,--------+------------1-...__...... __.._.,.__._ ___ _,.._.. ___.....,

C/l Q)

<.J C:

0...

<.J 0

0 -

0...

Q)

.c E

, z 50 6 -

4 -

2 -

0 85 70 I

89 90 II 0 130 150 Relative Density Dr%

93 97 COHESIVE GENERAL FILL d=90%

Minimum Cy-require I

101 105*

Degree of Compaction Cr %

Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Histograms of Relative Density and Degree of Compaction Values Obtained in General Fill Figure D(J)-5-12 10/04/99

f Q.

CJ >

> *--u * --

UJ Standard penetration resistance N, blows/ft 0

50 100 150 200 250 30C 0 -i--..-----L------'---------IL----------'---------'-------'

2 4

5 6

7 8

• • o*

• Standard penetration

-lest performed in 0

In-situ compacted material Average relotil densHy requi and structural till below el 830 75

() Structural fit 1 bttwttn el 830 and el 855 Structural fil I above el 85!5 0 In-situ soi I containing cloy and/or oroonic matter 80 85 0

5-Relotive density, Or%

()

0 Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Results of Standard Penetration Tests in Verification Borings Figure D(l)-5-13 10/04/99

~

~

~

~~

i:::'f;

~ ~

t, ;::

~C)

.~

9' ~

...... :::: ~-

~

0 5" c5 ::::

+>- a

\\0 Y".l

\\0 ~

~

~

ff&IIO Q:IOE!W.. IIICR.

fMCJM:ERING Cj

~

r.,,l t:H"l z t12 0 (0

> 0 O"

'"'l '"C;:

r.,,lr.,,lr,,

i-3 ::i:qr

-< z '"C

> Cj =

z ('1 O"

• t"'~

~:~

tll :;::, ~

ri.l tll ~

, i-3 t

:,

r.,,l > i;;*

'"C >-3 !:t o -

i.

, 0 ~

>-3 z

'2

~

~

MGII MFIIO MGII.

QUALITY COICTIIOI.

QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY

_CONTROL IIGII UGI!.

MGR D£f1NITIONS NED Rfl.RD A/'£D HID R&FIIO NS&l!Wl'I QA NOTE

• NUCUAR ENERGY DIV1SIDH

- REACTOR FUELS l IIEPl!OCfSSING DEPAl!TllENl

• ATOMICtJWEI! £OUIPMENTDEl'Al!TTl£NT NUCLEAR INSTIIUMENTATION DEl'Al!TlolENT IIEACTOR I. FUELS MANUFACTURING OPERATION NUCUAII SAFETY & 11'11!1 QUALITY ASSURANCE 01'£R1',l1DH TH£ 1111ft QUALITY COUNCIL CONSISTING Of REPRESENTATIVES FRON KEY OIIGAHIZA TIOHAL COMt'OIIEHTS

• 11s CHAIIIED av THE MANAGER BWR QUALIH ASSURANCE DENOTES RECEIVING PROJECT ORIENTED AOMINISlllATIV[

GUIDANCE. TECHNICAL SUPEIIVISIOH IS DENOTED IIY THE SOLID LINE.

NED GENERAL MGII.

NID GENERAL IICI!.

QUALi!*

CONTROi MGR l'IIOJECTS MARKETING IICR lll!OWlfS ftRIIY l i II Ill COOPEII LIIIEll!CK. AND II l'f.ACH IIOTTOII II ANO 111 1'11.GIIIM VfllllON'. fANK~ f NED DEPUTY DIVISION GE.NUALM;ft.

NS&NII-QA MGII.

QUALIT'r ASSUIIAIIC[

SP[CIALIST$

APED GE.HERAL IIGR.

MARKETING DESIGN ENG.

'NUCLEAR *

SYSTEMS P.IIOJECTS I.

P!OCUREMENT MGII.

ll(lj!

QUALITY CONTROL ENGINEERED EQUll'lll:NT IIGR QUALITY CONTROL l'IIOCUIIED EQUIP,ICNT GIIOUP I QIJALITY COHTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALISTS QUALITY CONTROL l'IIOCUREO EQUIPMENT GROUP 11 QU1',L11'" CONTROL EQUIPMENT tHSTALl.ATION MGf:

DEVfLOl'>tENT ENG IIGII.

POWEi! l'LANT l'ftOJECTS IICII PROJECT MGR

~IT(

RlS!C'lft\\l MOIi r-----------J I

I Q:JALi'T\\'

CONTROL t-Sill R£PRE5tt.l:T1vt TfCHNICAl SF'fCIAL:su NUCLEAR SYSTEM l'!!OlfCT Dll!IER STAftT-uf' Tf.ST SPECIALISTS

NPPD Site Representative Burns & Roe En ineerin Review CONSTRUCTION TEST Burns & Roe Construction Management Project Management Review DE Approve Issue Tests OPED Info Review Manufacturers Operating De artment Burns & Roe-CM GE-Site Mana er Quality Assurance Operating Department Coordinate Contracto Perform Tests PE RMED Project Management Evaluate Data Acceptance or Re ection Burns & Roe Engineering Operating Department Burns & Roe Engineering Manufacturers Burns & Roe - Con-struction Mana ement Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Construction Test Figure D(l)-7-1 10/04/99

NPPD Assistance G.E. For NSS Systems NPPD Sit.e Representative Burns & Roe Burns & Roe

&R-Construction Mana ement eo11-ttactt,r1/4 Support

, Manufacturer As Required G.E. On NSS S stems Pre are Coordinate PRE-OP & START-UP TEST Burns & Roe Engineering Pro ect Mana ement Review Approve Issue Tests DEVELOPED Review Manufacturers Op.er,ating De artme G.E.-On NSSS Aux. Interfaces G.E, On Nuclear Forward Results P.E..... ~RME

.. _n __ _

Project Management Burns & Roe Engine*ering Manufacture**

valuate Data Acceptance or Rejection Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Pre-Op and Start-Up Test Figure D(l)-7-2. 10/04/99

NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT COOPER NUCLEAR STATION PRE-OPERATIONAL TEST NO.

TI~LE: _______________________________________ _

PREPARED BY: -----------------------------------------

REVISION: _______________________ ____;DATE: ____________ _

PROCEDURE APPROVAL:

Date Date Date AUTHORIZATION TO PERFORM:

Plant Test and Operations Manager, Burns and Roe (BOP) ______________ _

(or)

Operations Manager, General Electric (NSSS)

Station Superintendent, Nebraska Public Power District CERTIFICATION...OE:.-TES.T...COMPLETION Date Date Date This test has been conducted in accordance with this procedure.

Test Engineer Date Burns and Roe (BOP)

Test Engineer Date General El~ctric (NSSS)

CERTIFICATION OF TEST RESULTS Pre-Op. Test Engr.

N.P.P.D.

Date This test has been satisfactorily completed and the system and equipment have met the requirements contained herein~

Exceptions:

~~~ineering (Site) sand Roe -

BOP Operations Mgr.

General Electric - NSSS Date Date Generation Engrg.

N.P.P.D. (Site)

Date Station Superintendent Cooper Nuclear Station Nebraska Public Power District Date COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)

Pre-Operational Test Procedure Cover Sheet Figure D(l)-7-3. W/04/99