ML23129A283
| ML23129A283 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 04/20/2023 |
| From: | Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML23129A261 | List:
|
| References | |
| NLS2023022 | |
| Download: ML23129A283 (1) | |
Text
( r*- (
NPPD GENERAL MANAGER NPPD NUCLEAR PROJECT AIMINISTRATOR I I B&R SR/QA NPPD ENGINEERING WMAI PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT MANAGER MANAGER
- MANAGER*
MANAGER I
I I!
I I l l WMAI I SR/QA NPPD NPPD RESIDENT L.. DENVER SITE SITE r
~ PROJECT STAFF MANAGER REPRESENTATIVE ENGINEER I
~
t'I t::H':lz I I t/l O ~
~n~ > 0 O"
',i,j 'tf.,
-~
- *L-L---: -~-- -,-- -, . L* ~r-. --~* __.. ---- ~-
II
- 0 ~ t_,,,l t'I ~ f **
~ 0 t:j ..., ~ 5 WHAL/QA B&R RESIDENT t, ~ J.. ~ z 'tf SR/QA CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANT 3 ~(~ > c:: = SITE MANAGER MANAGER zni::r PROJECT ENGINEER
~~a t"'= (BROWNVILLE) (BROWNVILLE)
I ~ ""'¢
- ('.BROWNVILLE)
..... ti ~
. "I ::!. t/l ~
~:i::ll 0
-~"" ti ti ~ t/l ~
0 ~ :::t. ~"'"3t:,
.i:,. 0 0 t_,,,i>i;;*
....... ~ :::: 'tf ..., Q-
\D
\D O o ~- OFF-SITE
~
..., z ... INSPECTORS INSPECTORS ON-SITE TESTING SURVEY CONTRACTORS CONTRACTORS
'2 TESTING
[':
~
- V;,P. l'.l~R.* ..I*: '* '. {(. \
( . POWER . .
DIVISION.
I NPPD ASST. MGR~ NUCLEAR POWER PROJECT DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR Cj
- (.l >i3 ; I
... i:::,
~ NPPD
~ l'"J
~ t:::inz (0
- -PROJECT PROJECT
'.?:] Cl t'/l O
~- (")~ >O~
"':l ~., EXE~I-VE MANAGER
- C "I
~ Cl K) l'"J l'"J !:l . I t--. '15 ;:: ""3 ::i:i r; . I:"
V °" I:) -< z ~
- "'I - I
~
Y;:: ~-- ~
>o= I
~C'l:i ,._ I I t"'=
I ~ V'!I
..... I:) to
- Zn~
t"' l'"J n
"'I ;:: > ;;?~
-<t'/l ::i:i
,_ ti Q.A. NPPD
-- ~*;::: ~ t'/l ~
0 I:) C'l SITE
- i:J""3t:,
o::::~ l'"l * !i,*
PROJECT
~§ a ~""3 a MANAGER MANAGER
\0 ~ Oon
\0 I:)
- i
- i:lz ....
""3
~ '2 t'/l I
Cl I I
- i >
~
QA SITE B&R (DENVER) MANAGER CONSTRUC-QA STAFF (BROWNVILLE TION MGR.
I I I I I I I ELECTRICAL CONCRETE MECHANICAL VENDOR SURVEY CIVIL DOCUMENT DOCUMENT TECHNICAL STRUCTURAJ CONTROL TEST CONTROL DOCUMENT INSPECTION REVIEW I
~ GE APED
- OTIIER VENDORS WAREHOUSING
,oRM 11* <8>
PAGi;__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
JOB NO, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ oA i:..._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ay_ _ _ _ _ _ _ cH*, _ _ _ _ _ _ __
cusTOMcR Nebraska Public Power Dist~ROJECT__C_o_o~p~e~r~N~u_;.c~l~e~a~r.....;;S_t~a~t~i_o~n~-------
SUBJECT Document Review Log C:
0
~
~* !
~
M u
a,
~
.,;, Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Document Review Log
.Figure D(J)-3-2 10/04/99
l,,'f-A lllVISION uSJlGE IP I 1*1' ls11 Iv, lsP ~N*J IPOr Bnstne*r in.g Standar d FE04.l Page 1 IX I. I I I I S SUED WELD PROCEDURE EVALUATION REVISED Project _____ ____
Customer
----- ----- ----- S-R No.
Contract No.
Vendor
-----Rev.----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Procedure No. U
--- Transmit tal No, & Date Edition and _____ _____ _____ ___Codes ASME Section IX
- 1. ___ Procedure is accepted w/o comment.
- 2. ___ Procedure is accepted as noted below. Revised, corrected pro-cedure is to be resubmitt ed for record.
- 3. ___ Procedure is not acceptabl e due to deficienc ies noted below.
Revised procedti're to be resubmitt ed for approval.
4* COMMENTS. . _--** . _
A. ___ All pages are not numbered and/or do not carry procedure number.
B. ___ Q-1 form number does not agree with weld procedure specifica -
tion number.
C. ___ Q-1 form does not carry signature of authorize d employee of manufactu rer.
D. All welding processes used for qualifica tion are not desig-nated or process designate d is not used for this procedure qualifica tion.
E. _ _,__ ASME, ASTM or other base metal specifica tions used are not specified or '.'P" number is incorrect .
F. ___ ASME, ASTM or other filler metal specifica tions are not specified or are incorrect for base material used.
G. ___ Group "F" number per ASME Section IX, Table Qll. 2, is not specified or is incorrect .
H. ___ Chemical analysis "A" number per ASME Section IX, Table Qll.3, is not specified or is incorrect .
I. Flux for submerged arc welding not specified or incorrect .
Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Weld Procedure Evaluation Figure D(J)-3-3 Page I of 2 10/04/99
[)f VI 'ii()!\ US/bE
,.,A I ,* I Pr ls11 h I lsr FE04.1 Page 2 I
I xi I I I ISSUED WELD PROCEDURE EV~UATION REV I SEO
- 4. COMMENTS (CONTD)
J. Gas for inert-gas welding not specified, incorrect or incorrect flow range.
K. Position not properly specified or not in accordance with ASME Section IX.
L. Preheat not specified or incorrect for material used.
M. Postweld heat treat cycle not complete or temperatures incorrect.
N. Backing strip use or material not specified.
- o. Thickness qualified not stated or incorrect per test material.
P. Preparation of base material improper for this process.
'--'" Q.
R. Defect repairs.not specified to a qualified procedure for the process designated.
- s. Peening requirements omitted or incorrect.
T. Treatment of backside of double welded joints not specified or incorrect.
- u. Other STEARNS-ROGER CORPORATION BY - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DATE ____________
Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Weld Procedure Evaluation Figu,:e D(J)-3~3 Page 2 o/2 10/04/99
l'ORM 11-4 <(!>
PAG..__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
JOB NO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OA _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 9y_ _ _ _ _ _ _ CH'.,.__ _ _ _ _ __
CUSTOMER Nebraska Public Power DistPROJECT Cooper Nuclear Station SUBJECT Purchase Order and Mill Test Report Status Cll
..i
~ i
~
c.;,
- ~ I Cll
..i 113
..i Cl.I 1M Cll oe
- a, *
/ o..i . '
ZH ell
..i a,
- i
- i;:::,
z o .c ZIC
~~
a, u
C:.-4
~ '
rn~
(/]~
~'"'0 Cll
- , : i
..i i
..,113 Cl.I
~
a, I
~
g: :
Cl.I Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION I UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR) 0 z
Purchase Order and Mill Test Report Status 0 Figure D(J)-3-4 10/04/99
- !"L
Form CNS - 20Zl2 Page 1 of _ _5____
\~
SHOP INSPECTION OF REACTOR FEED PUMP TURBINES A. Referenc e Documents
- 1. Nebraska Public Power District Contract E68-13 and Addendum No. 1 and Amendments No. 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Reactor Feed Pump Turbines
- 2. Codes and Standard s incorpor ated by referenc e a) ASTM - A27; A48; A201; A216; A217; A276; A293; A296; A285; B23; Bl49 b) AISI - Type 410; Type 422 c) ASME d) AISC e) AWS f) NEMA g) NEC-h) IEEE i) NBFU j) Hydraul ics Institut e k) State of Nebraska local codes and regulati ons
- 1) Uniform Building Code - Internat ional Conferen ce of Building Officia ls B. Document Referenc e for Q. A. Checks
- 1. Turbine F"eatures a) General Requirem ents - Pg. G-9, Para. 3.1, subpara. a, sub-subpara. 1, 2 and 3.
b) Casing, Lagging and Blading - Pg. G-9, Para. 3.1, subpara.
b, sub-subp ara. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
c) Stop Valves - Pgs. G-9 and G-10, Para. 3.1, subpara. c.
d) Governin g Devices - Pg. G-10, Para. 3.1, subpara. d, sub-
-~- subpara. 1, 2 and 3. -
Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Shop Inspection Check/"ist - Example:
Shop Inspection ofReactor Feed Pump Turbines Figure D(l)-3-5 Page I of 5 *. 10/04/99
Form CNS - 20Zl2
(* Page 2 of ___s__
\,_,,
B. Document Reference for Q. A. Checks (cont'd) e) Pro tecttve*Be-.I.ces .-1c= P-g..=.-* lO:;i:* Para.-.*.* 3 d::r~:sub-para .--,*.e; ,..sub:- __
subpara. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
f) Lubrication System - Pgs. G-10 and G-11, Para. 3.1, subpara.
f, sub-subpara. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8.
g) Steam Sealing System - Pg. G-11, Para. 3.1, subpara. g.
h) Turning Gear - Pg. G-11, Para. 3. 1, subpara. h.
i) Instrumentation and Controls - Pgs. G-12 and G-13, Para.
3.1, subpara. i, sub-subpara. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13.
j) Soles Plates - Pg. G-13, Para. 3.1, subpara. j.
k) Materials and Workmanship - Pg. G-13, Para. 3.2, subpara.
a, b, c and d.
- 1) Painting and Protection - Pgs. G-13 and G-14, Para. 3. 3.
(. .
Elec-tric.ahlRequi't'.-eriiem:s-.-r:~~"""--,G-i..-'!:-,.,-and~~i:&,:..Pa:ra.. :-: *3~i:4.,~
'-~ m) subpara. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i and j, sub-subpara. l and 2.
n) Shop Tests - Pg. G-15 and G-16, Para. 3.5, subpara. a, sub-subpara. i, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
o) Conformed Data Sheets - Pgs. G-19 thru G-23, Para. l.*O; l.l; 1.2; 1.3; 1.4; 1.5; 1.6; 1.7; 1.8; 1.9; 1.10; 1.11; 1.12; 1.13; 1.14; 1.15; 1.16 and l.17~
p) Contractors Drawing Submittal DeLaval Turbine Incorporated Drawing No. CC-90946 *
- Latest Revision Drawing No. *cc-90945 Latest Revision.,
Drawing No. CC-90943 Latest Revision Drawing No. so- 704564- 5 Latest Revision Drawing No. CCA-1788 Latest Revision Drawing No. H-38_32 Latest Revision Drawing No. F'.-8736 Latest Revision Drawing No. D-60234 Latest Revision Drawing No. D-60232 Latest Revision q) Other Applicable Data - DeLavel Alternate Proposal, T-2001 Telegrams,* May 23 and 24, 1968 and CPPD letter of June 26, 1968 and DeLavel letter of May 24, 1968 - attached to contract documents.
Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Shop Inspection Checklist - Example:
Shop Inspection ofReactor Feed Pump Turbines Figure D(l)-3-5 Page 2 of 5 10/04/99
Form CNS - 20Zl2
(\...,,; Page 3 of __s;;,___
- c. Rejec table Crite ria CNS - 20Zl2 .
A check mark under "No" for any item in check list Nebrask a Public Power District COOPE R NUCLE AR STATIO N UPDAT ED SAFET Y ANALY SIS REPOR T (USAR)
Shop Inspection Checklist - Example:
Shop Inspection ofReactor Feed Pump Turbines Figure D(.1)-3-5 Pqge 3 of 5 10/04/99
(
(
Form CNS - 20Zl2 Page 4 of 5 CHECK LIST FOR SHOP INSPECTION OF REACTOR FEED PUMP TURBINES Location of. Shop - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Not
~ No Applicabl e Inspector Date
- 1. General Requireme nts per reference B.l.a
- 2. Casing, Lagging and Blading per reference B.l.b
- 3. Stop Valves per reference B.l.c
- 4. Governing Devices per reference B.l.d
- 5. Protectiv e Devices per reference B. 1. e
- 6. Lubricatio n System per reference B.l.f
- 7. Steam Sealing System per reference B.l.g d 8. Turning Gear per.refere nce B.l.h
~ -
'.ll-§ 0q* ::i" ~ ~ 9. Instrumen tation and Controls per reference
.:: "' t,:l
~ '1::l .g::t- t:::H"Lz B.l.i t, ~ ,__, Cll O to 7'. :::- :::t > 0 O"
..._ c*~ 1-.:l "ti.,
'i'::i~ t,:l t,:l !;; 10. Sole Plates per .reference B.l.j y,~ '"3 ::,::, 5
,._, ::-, ao* ><: z "ti
~ ::I > d = 11. Materi'als and Workmanship per reference B. l. k__
"1::, ti ,..._ z n O" ti ::s:: > t"' ~
~
()<:j aC
-~ "'I C') t"' t,:l "ti 12. Painting and Protection per reference B.1.1
~ ><:
Cll ::,::,
> ::I!0
-I>..~ --
-~ ~;:;. rn Cll ~
,._,, s:i_ I
- ,::, '"3 0 13. Electrica l Requireme nts per reference B.l.rn t,:l>t;;*
- p ~
..... SI ti "ti '"3 ::t 0 'ti ..§ 0 0 ~-
- ,::,z ....
25"
~ ~ 1i, "' '"3
....... "'I **
'°'° ;.;*~ '2
~
~
(,~
<U
<"CJ Q
~
0 N
..4 N ,....._
~
0 Q N
E-<
I ll"I z 0
C/l u z
u e
Cl.I
<U oO ~
0 C1l H p..
~
~
E-<
~
0.4 Q
ui z,....
0 ....
w w
I:"<
~,
0:::
0 E-<
c., JEI
~
I:"<
0 z
0 1-(
CIJ h
(J c.,;. c::
w c:: O" P-1 C/l CIJ M .....
z 1-( 1:0 CIJ
'4-1 1:0 CIJ CIJ M CIJ P-1 tJ (J 0
- i::: c:: M c::
CIJ CIJ CIJ C/l M 0. M
~
CIJ
'4-1 ..... ~
CIJ ca
""E-<
CIJ <II M .u M C/l 1-4 ....e
.u M
CIJ CIJ 1-(
..:l
- 0. .c 0.
- .:: 0. Ul C/l ca
.u 0 .u c., .a CIJ 00 u
~ C/l
'4-1
. *(II
.a C/l
....c::
~
~
(II
- o ca ,-f re, ).a .0 c:: .u Q Ill
.....u 0
Q ft!
CQ ....
(J re, -0 0 0.
(J <II .u 0.
.0 E (J
..:l re, 0 *1-4 0. 1-4
.u (I) c:: c:: ..... .a
~
0 0 .u c.o u c., 1:0 0 .u c::
-:t
'° I0
<:.:)
~ ~
Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Shop Inspection Checklist - Example:
Shop Inspection ofReactor Feed Pump Turbines Figure [)(1)-3-5 Page 5 -of 5
- 10/04/99
IHSPECTIOH E XPEDITIHG P.O. No. ltem(a) Datt
'OPINtf Vendor No. ,s. tt Hepr... ntatlve I *Acldreu Pa. 1 nf Contacts w/Title:
De Ii very Promise: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
NARRATIVE REPORT
. Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Inspection and Expediting Narrative Report Figure D(J)-3-6 10/04/99
- **- --------- -- ---~u,;arns*p. --~ *- -**- - - -*- *-- - --- ---**-**---*----*-
( .
COR.,ORATION [
COOPER NUCLE :.. ._ __ ~fATION Page:
( __
)ate 1 INSPECTION PUNci LIST REPORT Contract No:
[nspector Distribution: Stearns-Roger QA - Original+ 3 Contractor:
Burns & I}oe CM - 1
\pproved Contractor - 2 Location:
NPPD (Site) - 2 Description*
1 I Disposition, If Required Item of Work To Be Corrected Correct Date *Acceptable Date 1, If "Acceptable".- state reasons.
REMARKS:
Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Inspection Punch List Report Figure D(l)-3-7 10/04/99
.*.. -* ***-***** ----- --~ --*** ,_
~~~ ' -._11~:aw-,.;* COOPER NUCLEAR~ TON Conti.*act No: -
Date:l_ DEVIATION RE!. Contractor:
(
Inspector: Distribution: S-R Q.A. - Original+ 3 Location:
NPPD - 2 Approved: B&R, CM & Eng. - 2 Dwg. No.: Rev. No.:
Contractor - 2 Spec. Pg. No.: ppg.
Site Management Accepted DEVIATION Disposition Rework Acceptable S-R Inspector Date As Is
\
e
~
t:I
-,l i:,:,
t:I ("'.) z Cll O ~
~i;::
> 0 O"
":l~..,
i:,:, I:>:!~
~ t, t, ~ ~ ::o r I -*
.:::: a z ("'.) ~: O" v.,C I ::! > t"' i;-
Oo ::,:, t"'l':I~
-<Cll > 0
~ :,0 ~
.... C riJ Cll ~
S2::t 0 :ti -,l
.l'>, i:,:,
- t:It;;*
- a ~-,ls
0 0 n*
'° ::0
-,l z- ..*,
'2Cll
-ES
--**--*------*----***-~-
CONTRACT NO. DEVIATION REPORT LOG CONTRA CTOR'-- ---------- ---~'--
i LOCATION------ ------ ---- - SHEET NO.
r
(\...
D.R. NO. I DESCRill'lON . I DA'l'E I INITIATED I BY £CCEPTED DA_ TE I ACCl-:l'TJ*;
BY INITIATED
......... J 1
I
I' Deviation Report Log Figure D(l)-3-9 10/04/99 I
I I.
COOPER NUCLEAR STATION CONTRACTOR: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
CONCRETE PLACEMENT CHECKOUT SHEET Pour Description _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Pour No. and Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Contract No. _ _ __
CONTRACTOR CHECKOUT QUALITY ASSURANCE CHECKOUT Item Representat ive Date Item Representat ive Date Carp. Fore. Fonns & B lockouts Lab. Fore. Cleanuo Resteel Resteel Struct. Steel Struct. Steel&Bolt s Xechanical Pipin~
Electrical Elec. Installation Engineer Line & Grade Suot. Embedded Ttems Anchor Bolts & Sleeves
- ,o,,1*
Weather Protection STEARNS-ROGER CORP. BURNS AND ROE, INC, QUALITY ASSURANCE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CONSTRUCTION MANAGE MENT--- -----
(ALL ABOVE ITEMS MUST BE SIGNED OFF WHEN APPLICABLE)
CONCRETE PLANT NOTIFIED: DATE _ _ _ _ _ _ TJME _ _ _ __
SITE MANAGEMENT NOTIFIED: DATE TlME-----
INSPECTOR NOTIFIED: DATE TIME-- ---
P.OUR STARTED: DATE TlME-----
POt.JR COMPLETED: DATE TlME-----
CLASS OF CONCR ETE:-*- --------- --
CUBIC YARDS ESTil1ATED: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
CUBIC YARDS P L A C E D : - - - - - - - - - - - -
WEATHER CONDIT IONS:-.- ---------- -
DISTRIBUTION:
.,,NPPD (2 copies)
BURNS & ROE (2 copies)
S-R, Q.A. (2 copies)
BATCH PI.ANT (1 copy)
BLOUNT BROS. (2 copies)
Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Concrete Placement Checkout Sheet Figure D(J)-3-10 10/04/99
QUALITY ASSURANCE NPPD - COOPER NUCLEAR STATION CONTRACT NO: -----
PIPE BACKFILL TICKET INSPECTOR;___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ DATE GRADE & INTER.i.'l'AL
!DENT. LINE CLEANING t{DT COATING COMMENT CONT. Q.A. CONT. Q.A. CONT. Q.A.
I CONT. I Q.A.
~:
........., -- ---*--~ *- -
Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
SUE XANAGEt1ENT Pipe Backfill Ticket Figure D(l)-3-11 10/04/99
( ( {
Page of COOPER NUCLEAR STATION ELECTRICAL INSTALIATION CHECK OFF LIST Contract _______ _______ ____ Contractor Description-----,----------------------------------------~-----
System
- Location Manufacture r P. 0.
D n h
- 1. Identificati on Nameplate -
Tag Data Mill Number
- 2. Routing Trav Conduit Other
- 3. Termination Identificati on Tags I
~ Continuitv
'tl
~~ I 4. Grounding I t"'l
~ t::H":l z
~a (IQ' "Ii tl.l O ~
- : n* >Oi::r
- 5. Insulation Per Drawing/Spec ~
~ e.. : ~; I t, :i' ~ ::0 5 ification Test
'tl I
<z ,*
2s >~=
I t.,,i5"- :zni::r t"'~ 6. Supports I - I t-v §
-- *~ t"'l 'tl tl.l ~ 0
\J .... ;11
..... ::s,.. Cl.! Cl.!~ ..
0"" ::o~o I 7. Recorcts Contractor' s Qualitv c5 0
_.,.,:;- t"'l>!ii' Control
'tl ..,
~~ Oo s:*
'°~ t--, ::0 z !l.
c:;* ~
I
- '2Cl.!
~
NS*L4 CONCRET E BATCH PLANT INSPECTIO N REPORT
('-,.
DATE: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ CONTR ACT:-- -------
CLASS:---------
WEATHER: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ INSPECTOR: _ _ _ _ _ _
MIX DESIGN WEIGHTS PER YD
_ _ _ _ no., _ _ _ _ sks Excess Cement: Agg. Water Sand: (ssd) _ _ _ _ _ no. Mo: _ _ _ _ % _ _ _ _ _ _ lb. _ _ _ _ lb. _ _ _ gal 3/4" Rock: (ssd)
_ _ _ _ _ no. Mo: % - - - - - - lb. lb. gal
lb. gal 11/2" Rock: (ssd) no. Mo: % _ _ _ _ _ _ lb.
Admixture:
Admixture:
_______ oz. _ _ __
oz.
_ _ _ _ _ gal. _ _ _ _ _ _ gal Design Water:
Total Water: _ _ _ _ gal/yd Plant Time Ticket Cement Sand 3/4" Rock 11/2" Rock Adm. Adm. Water Truck Vo~
In No. yd lb. lb. lb. lb. oz. oz. gal.
No. Out
('-' -- --- *---:----;:-. 1-,-.. .......- * ....,....
i I
II
~ ,
Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Concrete Batch Plant Inspection Report Figure D(l)-3-13 10/04/99
CNS- L5 LAB. WORK SHEET AND FILE
(\....,
TIME : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
DATE : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
SAMPLE LOCA TION: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
MATE RIAL: SAND DRY WT.+ TARE WET WT. + TARE TARE DRY WT.+ TARE
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ x 100 = %
- r,:
Moisture In Sand TIME : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
DATE : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
SAMPLE LOCA TION : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
( ~ MATE RIAL: --:314 " ROCK DRYW T.+TA RE WET WT.+ TARE TARE DRYW T.+TA RE _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ x 100= . %
.. 7 Moisture In Rock TIME : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
DATE : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
SAMPLE LOCA TION : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
MATE RIAL: 11/2" ROCK DRY WT.+ TARE WET WT.+ TARE TARE DRY WT.+ TARE
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ x100 = .%
.*7 Moisture in Rock Nebras ka Public Power Distric t COOP ER NUCLE AR STATI ON UPDATED SAFET Y ANALYSIS REPOR T (USAR)
Lab Work Sheet and File Figure D(l)-3 -] 4 I 0/04/9 9
CNS*L9 NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT Cooper Nuclear Station Lab No.: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Project Laboratory LAB DATA Material: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date Sampled: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Mark: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Time Sampled: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Sampled by: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Sample Source: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Acc.
Weight %
Sieve Ret: % Specs Retained Ret.
2" Initial Wet Wt:
11/2" Initial Dry Wt:
1" Diff:
3/4" Moisture:
3/8" Initial Dry Sample Wt.:
- 4 Dry Wt. After
- 8 (# 200) Wash:
- 16 Oiff:
- 30 Loss:
- 50 *Remarks:
- 100
- 200 Pan Total Date:
Lab. Technician Tested by: _ _ _ _ _ __
Lab.Technician Cale. by: _ _ _ _ _ __
Nebraska Public Power District Lab. Technician Checked b y : - - - - - -
COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR) Lab. Manager Approved by: _ _ _ _ __
Lab Data Figure D(J)-3-15 10/04/99
CNS-L3 DATE: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
NEBRA SKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRIC T COOPER NUCLEA R STATIO N CLASS: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
PROJECT LABOR ATORY LOCATIO N: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
CONCRETE FIELD INSPECTION REPORT JOB YDS. REMARK S INSF TIME TICKET SLUMP AIR TEMP. BATCH NO. WATER WATER
\
}
I Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATE D SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR) REVIEWE D BY:
Concrete Field Inspection Report REVIEWE D BY:
Figure D(J)-3-16 10/04/99
I'-'
CNS*L l NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT Cooper Nuc lear Stat ion Proj ect Labo rator y Lab No.:
LAB FIELD DATA Clas s: Mat eria l:
Date Samp led: By:
Mark:
Con tract : Time:
Tick et No.:
Sample Sour ce:
Slump: inch Spec . Stre ngth :
gals . Wet Wt: cf Wate r Added Job:
Air: %
Batc h Volume:
(_'-" Remarks: ..
Tota l Load Com press ive Test ed Test Date Age 1
(#) Stre ngth (psi ) by:
(Days)
Nebraska Public Power District COOP ER NUCLEAR STATION
)
UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPO RT (USAR Lab Field Data Figure D{l)- 3-17 10/04/99
CNS-L S T
NEB RAS KA PUB LIC POWER DIST RIC Cooper Nuclear Stati on Project Labo rator y COMPRESSION TES T OF CONCRETE Report Date: _ _ _ _ _ __
- Lab No: _ _ _ _ _ _ __
_ _ _ Con tract No.: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Tick et No.: _ _
Class: _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sam pled By: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Time: _
Date Sampled Source:----------
CON CRE TE PROPERTIES MIX DAT A SLUMP: ------INCH CEME NT: ------LBS - - - - - - PCF MO: _ _ _ _ _ _ %* WET WEIG HT/C UBIC FOOT:
SAND :
LBS MO: %* AIR CONT ENT: -- -- -- %
3/4" ROCK ------LBS
LBS MO: _ _ _ _ _ _ %* SKS/Y O 11/2"R OCK :
NOM INAL CEME NT FACT OR:
,.l'.'IMIXTURE: - - - - - - OZ SKS/Y O ACTU AL CEME NT FACT OR:
"IXTU RE: _ _ _ _ _ _ oz .:....*. - .
-~.,-. . . - - - - - - GAL/ YD WATER/CEMENTRATJ.Q _ _ _ _ _ _ __
.s~D REMA RKS: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l~T ER :
BATCH WATE R:
BATC H: ADO JOB W A T E R : - - - - -
_ _ _ _ yi)5 AGG. WATE R:
TOTA L WATE R:
COMPRESSION TES T 70A Y 28D AY -- DAY Com p. Comp.
Comp. Max. Load .Max. Load Strength Max. Lciad Strength Strength lbs.
lbs. (psi)
(psi) lbs. (psi)
I Spec ified 28 Day Strength (psi)
-"'* Aggregate weights satur ated surfa ce dry.
Mois ture exces s over satur ated surfa ce dry.
Project Labo rator y Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUC LEA R STATION By: _ _ _ _ _ _- - ' - - - -
(USAR)
UPD ATE D SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Lab. Mana ger Compression Test of Concrete Figure D(l)- 3-18
- 10/04/~9
't Sheet No. (
\ Issue Date COOPER NUCLBAR STATION DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS Description ________ _______ Contractor Contract No.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Checked By _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date R : Required P. O. No. _ -------- A: Accomplished Supplier-----------------------
Cert tert Mfr's No MTR Compl PT MT UT RT Hydro .Leak Rep' t Certs Item R A. R A RA R AR A RA RA R A RA Req 1 d Additional Requirements and Comments cj
~
o-'l t"l
- !) t, on '.2!
tl.l O (0
~ C
- (") > 0 C"
"':l .,, .,
iil ;:
t, ~ t"l t"l' o-'l ::i:,5
-::::~ -<'.;ii!.,,
'--' ::i > cj =
~~ '.;ii! (":) C" I C
..... :::i > t"" if-
'O >.:,
~ ~~~
>t:l tl.l ::i:, ::!
v.l tl.l i; 0 ~- ::i:,o-'lo c3 ::!
.j::,.~
t"l>i;;-
........ :::i .,, o-'l 3:
~c:,- Oot>* ,.
- i:,z-o-'l
'2tl.l
,ES
Sheet No.
COOPER NUCLEAR STATION Issue Date DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS (ELECTRICAL)
Contr actor_ _ _ _ _ __
Contr act No. _ _ _ __ Descr iption P. 0. No. ___ ____ Prepa red By___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Suppl ier Inser t Speci fic requir emen t numbe r in ColUIIlll Rand note accom Jlishm ent in A.
R A R ARA RA RA R A R A R A RA B A Comments Item Ident ificat ion Legen d of Docum ent Requi remen t Numbe rs:
- 1. Cert of Comp liance (Mfg. and testin g)
- 2. Cert of Comp liance (Mate rials)
- Nebraska Public Power District
- 3. Diele ctric Test Repor ts COOPE R NUCLE AR STATIO N 4 .. Conti nuity Test Repor ts UPJ;>ATE~ SAFET Y.ANAL YSIS REPOR T (USAR)
S. Radia tion Servi ce Certi ficati ons
- 6. Stand ard Shop Test Repor ts Documentation Requirements (Electrical)
- 7. Funct ional Check Repor ts Figure D(J) 20 10/04/99
- 8. Calib ration Data
- 9. Instru ction Books numbe rs)
- 10. Other requir emen ts (list each and assig n seque ntial
.....,_ _ _ _-1 ~JEG T cSUlOE-LE:G E:t-J D:
___! ACTIOtJ6 0%2 F-UNCTIO>-J~
0 E:J.JTl11E:."'.;)
Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEA R STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Organization Flow Chart Figure D(l)-4-1 10/04/99
ENGINEERING STANDARDS DESIGN CRITERIA*~----*;.
AND QUALITY CONTROL GN :1- --- --- --,
..-- --- -~' EN GI NE ER IN G AND DE SI
' IBID DRAWINGS I
SPECIFICATIONS BID PACKAGE PROCUREMENT BY NPP:O BID SUBMITTAL AND EVALUATION
,------------4 CONBYTRACTNPPDAW AR Di --- --- --,
r "AS-BUILT" INFORMATION APPROVED AND DRAWINGS DRAWINGS Nebr aska Publi c Powe r Distr ict COO PER NUC LEA R STAT ION UPD ATED SAFE TY ANA LYSI S REPO RT (USAR)
Engineering and Design Flow Char t Figure D(l)- 4-2 10/04/99
r~0
-J.
ol/'I
'2.
.no J) ill
'5)
-~'-J I-
- z \))-
- z
~,J\
i,:2 I- IL '2 0
-..>::i 2 Q 0
,J\- 0
,du. UJ 1111-c?;1j ~
v ~
~ 0 :z~~
~gM LL v
_J
~i iJJ 0
_I 0
.u Q_ -<l Cf_
\)) v 5
~
ct "I:
2
() ,(\ tU i=- "2 i!J J
-4 ()
- 1. Li:
~
'=u fr ~
u I-u Ill &lJ cl LIi Cl 0
'J:
u ~
Q.
\.J Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Specifications and Calculations Flow Chart Figure D(])-4-3 10/04/99
Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Drawings Flow Chart Figure D(l)-4-4 10/04/99
a\l\
o::z \l\
II\ Q w 0 ::z 1-- !::-
ou 2 j:::Z I-tlJ \.)::J -:2
-<t IL w G
w D0
_J 1--
~ w
.u~ .J
..J--.:i ii 8 u_
d) a
,u
}-
0.
0 lJ 0..
0 lJ (J
- z Q
ex
~
Cl Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Vendor and As-Built Drawings Flow Chart Figure D(l)-4-5 10/04/99
NPPD NUCLEAR PROJECT
. . ADMINISTRATOR PROJECT MANAGER I Cj I I I I C) "'ti=
~ Otj C) l:)
> I I C) ;::: t"'~l Isl ~.- ------ I
. ~ ~* ti ("'.! z I
~K:) l:) ~ Ill O ~
> 0 O"
~-§it g ""l '1 RESIDENT NPPD t"'l "'t"'=l ~ PROJECT PROJECT
~.Wto ~ := 5 tl:t,.g ~ i<z"'= ENGINEER MANAGER
~ Co "l ~
> C: =
'ri=~,
...,,i:l.:: (") z ("'.! 51:
> t"' ;;*
I H Co C) I (Is
.!... C);::: C) t"' t"'l "'=
(Is Rsi~ --< > 0 Ill i= ~
-"-:,:t,."l rn Ill ~ I
!;:tio.:;:,;: := ~ ti 0
..,. ~ Co.::
C) C) t"'l>!ii* NPPD
\0 Ci ::l. ii,' "'= ~ 3: ASSISTANT NPPD
\0 ::! l:) l:) r,* SITE SITE
~ "l
~~
- =0 0
~
z ..... PROJECT MANAGER IREPRESENTATIVE
- l
- ) ENGINEER
~ §"* '2 Ill (BROWNVILLE) c!
I LABORATORY DEWATERING INSP. EARTHWORK SECRETARY SUPERVISOR ENGINEER INSPECTOR LABORATORY DEWATER ING EARTHWORK TECHNICIANS TECHNICIANS TECHNICIANS
I Sample obtained from in-place density test j I Sample identified according to area, date, and consecutive sample number I Sample transported to laboratory with field density test results and entered in log book I Sample weighed and visually classified I Sample oven-dried at 105°C 24 hrs for cohesive soil and 3 hrs for cohesionless soil and weighed I In-placeI dry unit weight and water content calculated I I
I COHESIVE SOIL I I COHESIONLESS SOIL I I l Determine percent fines and liquid Determine maximum and minimum dry and plastic limits unit weights*
I I
~alculate degree of compaction using Calculate relative density reference compaction curves I
I I
Results checked & reported to Assistant Project Engineer
' I I I Test results meeting specifications Test results not meeting specifica-summarized and filed tions reported to project engineer I
Addit.ional coverages *of compaction requested in the field or construe-tion *Management informed of the need for corrective measures j
- Vibratory table used for the determination of th2 maximum dry unit weight; every tenth determination was repeated for reproducibility check; and approx every tenth sample used to determine the maximum dry unit weight according to the "Basic" method.
Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Flow Diagram of Laboratory Phase of Quality Control Testing of Structural and General Fills Figure D(J)-5-2 10/04/99
I 0
0 0 <l
! 0
<l 0
) <lo
~
..,0
(/)
0 0
- -§ 0
-~
~
0 0
r=-=-
<l 0
<b <l 0
(" 0
) 0 0
~l:J
-~ti
!~...
C: C:
(
- i*u ~ ~
Q
(.)
- l:J l:J Q.
g8
~ ~ *- l:J ::,.
- t:;
'f' I l:J
~::, .!:, (.) .!:,
-~.2 I
g ... 't ~
-f\\ir
~
i= = =
.5: .£: ~
~~ ;g~ ~C: 2 c:: -~
0 0,
"E .... :c:~ .~l:J A 0
... l:J ...
e :t:; *o 0 :~ 0 ~
~a: ~ ~ ~o
~ ::: -~ :.:: ] t-~
It C:
- a *~t
,S!
'<tlll<..>~ ;Q.~
I I I
"""Q.Q_: ,.::,
o *!:::
0::,
i::,* ... ~~ &~
" E l:J ... 1
~ 8C: 'tic; ~...::, .qti.... ,." ....l:J i
... Nebraska Public Power District
,. C:
._g Q.Q.A,e: isi~
...I co 8 l:J '<t E ::,.
(.) COOPER NUCLEAR STATION I
.! ~~~~Cl:X :Q::
Cf) u
... 0 UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
I ~
~:,.
ii:~
0 ** * <l X I I I ";;
I()
I I I <ti
'- Locations ofPiezometers, Heave Points, Deep Wells, Verification Borings, and In-Situ Compaction and Structural Fill Construction Areas Figure D(I)-5-3 I 0/04/99
e
-g iii 0
C:
2u vi C:
0 u
- - u 0
".' 8.
c: E
-o u
cu C
C 0
0 8><
l.LJ
./
.5 I "O ...
c::~
4)
- E 4)
I i 0 t t Q)
I § I
C:
- - N
- 4>
o*a.
- 4) * -
> ~C: al I ~i C.
- i
... I-""'
4)
I 0 C.
N
... Q.
o ...~
/ 4> .,... C)
- r; E g~
-0 ::i
/ C) Ill
/ . .
/ .
/
/
/
(
I I
{
....a.
\ <(
\
0 0 0 0 0 (\I
- 0 f'- U)
U")
<X)
'll;f" <X)
- ~
<X)
<X) <X) <X) <X)
(1)
Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEA R STATION UPDATE D SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Results oJObse,v ations ofExcavation and Groun_dwater Levels in Reactor Building Area Figure D(l)-5-4 I 0/04/99
0 0 * ***** * * * * * * *** ** ** *
- s * *
~
0 0
a Cl)
_ _ tt_
( /)
C:
Q)
-0 Q)
> 0 I.D 0
Q) 0::
~+-- --~- ----r ----- ---.- ----- -
0 Cl) 0 0
.1!:?
<D
§_1 0
3:
.c 0 Q)
CIQ) g...
- Q) z 0 Cl) I.D Q)
(.)
~
C 0
- en
( /)
Q)
C 0 0 s::t 0
- I*
V"-.
Cl)
-c~
C:
\ CD CD It) g';.!::r---
Q.)
0.
-0 I
- a::
0 Q
0 C\J
-0 C:
0 CJ) 0
<D 0 0 (\J ~ I.D U 's1 !OS ni!S-U! }O a:>o}*J ns Mo1aq 4idaa Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Results of Standard Penetration Tests and Calculated Relative Densities ofIn-Situ Compacted Material
- Figure D(l)-5-5 10/04199
U &. 11T AHOAIIO &II: V[ .. Z.C
.. ,:-::: . ~- i
-llN HO.* HO. IO HO .00 4 Ii
- Z()O l t- -
T l, T I I I I ii,,-
I I
--l t-*
-4
- -+.- ::..::: ~
I I Ii
~
I I' I
~ ' 11 : 11 i I: i--, I*
5rain-size ___
~ ,. :'-I~,
IO I I 11 f- .. Representat Ve I
111i d1"Str1but.1on eo1.1rve5 l'or sand_
I l
!! I l
.l ii I "N l lf'rom main ~xcavat,on-r.t I, ~\11
-rr--- :r1 ;-r*i-- n t f -*-
1 ' 11 I \ \ I
_J _ .. ,;i\ t--
I
- 1 .* , ..... ! .
,-..t-I I t-
_J__
-- :Ij
~~
I
- t-. -
l~t- r-*-
I
, I, I I i )ij I I I I I I' I
.... ~I* lI;1-
- ,I
'\
I
-t - --
nt *:, ~
- T I'
.. i I . ... . . .
~
i I ' I
\ !,,
i I I . Ii ~
' -. 1 1--
,i' I
\ I Ii* t I .... - - IL - .......
i*~'
l I
. . I
. -* -r- - -*! *r-I I
I
- --4--
I I I
-L1-f *--
\ .
+--**-+--m......I. _
I.,
-ff.
l i
- ,I
-. I fl I
. ' * - ~-1 I
l : 11 I
~
II i II . :i*
--+ ' i I I
- - , I
.-+.---- ~, i; \H '.!. i j**+
JO I 1'
. I I 7*. I ~ - *- - I I I - . -
I 11 j li \ \' \\ ;1 ; i !' I I I ' I I
- :-f-l-I I I ,.., '. ,.II I \' ~ I,'; I II I !
I I I '
! !11 '-'* I' li I ~\~ ,: I i
~ ___
Ii hµ l:
- I I
- i~ : ; !
JL I I ~: !
I I! I' I I I l rI "-,;
~II I I i I
~ C ... 10 10
.c E::,
z o~;i_-~ ;i......,1 --'--"L.. .-1~-4-- 1.--L--' --'-~--L .....J-..1 -...L-..- -----,---
50 7580 IOO 125 150 175 200 Relative Density, Dr 0/o Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Histograms ofRelative Density Values Obtained in Structural Fill Figure D(l)-5-9 10/04/99
Standard penet ration resist ance N, blows /ft o ____
0 50___ __
100 150___ ___ .._____ _250 200 _.
S tondord penetrot ion Avera<;1e relative fest perfonn ed in density require d3/4 0 In-situ compacted material and strucnxol fill below el 830 75
() Structure I fi 11 between el 830 and el 855 80 e"Structural fill above el 855 65 2
()
(\J
...... 3
()
()It
~
Cl) ()
ta Cl) 0 0..
4 0~
0 0
(..) () 0
()
Cl)
()
> 0
()
Cl) 0
> 5
.: ()
u Cl) w ()
()
6 ()
0
()
0 7
0 8
Nebrask a Public Power District COOPE R NUCLE AR STATIO N UPDAT ED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPOR T (USAR)
Results of Standard Penetration Tests in Structural Fill Figure D(l) 10 10/04/99
LEGEND A Deep well backf ifted and covered with fill.
0 Type A piezorneter N~ TerTWOry piezometer A ~~ wen opercrt,ng MISSOURI RIVER F L O W----*
- 6. Deec w,-11 ac-t ope.-ating
,-"V' ,._A, Sheetpile Clllof f WOii Colle ctor e11pe APPROX. SHORELINE f'~-N g()! /m:n
-.70 indica tes J:s~nD:-J
- 8 4 5 - Grrunctwo!13:r 1:on 1ovr r:h?*.-,:1*c.n Nore s-01-: I t"ti-. br.*s1~ o! w.:::!tet (1} Conrours were interp reted
"""42A(BS.9)
- eleva tions meos i.;red w*th, n be s1 ..:i:etr,:1-~
-== ---m :eve!
J(",) JI~r~"' t ~
______::;:,.__o.,_
1==--1--1-~ --. .:: ::; .,- ~ cutof f wall.
\'1!0..Q.N.l- ______ 1~ have two pumps operoffng.
a: (2)Deep wells W34 and W35
- as 2: ::: -,, ,,k iis ~N 36 and W37 hove one
~A(8 8()_ 7)<~ 52.9 ) ---*----- {3)Deep wells W 18,W 28,W 31,W I Q pump opera ting, hrs.
< I --- --- -- {4)Rlver' eleva tion 881.1 at 0800 853 -._ cellu lar coffe rdam and ING {5)To tal discharge rate from TURBINE-GENERATOR BUILD plart bowl 422 gal/m in.
- ~ is capped and covered (877.510{6) Deep well casln gW8 0 with fifl.
) Groundwater level measurem ents could not be tq,, m 25A, 33A, 39A, 44A, 4 made in piezo mete rs 2A, 13A, 49A, 1051\ and 107A because of dama qe 1o the 048A l8542 ) 025A risers. )
well symb olls deep well (S)Number adjac ent to deep
~ \ CONffl<X.. number.
r symbols are
( :557 R0O, {9) Numbers adjacent to plezomete 1
dwater levels, piezometer numbers and groun respectively.
102A (~'.0 ~3,l(~t
~IA(855.4l0 I RAOWASTE Olo7A r- -- -- -- -- ... ~\ ;J BUILDING Scale I in.= I00f I.
Cooto ur Inter val= 1ft.
e
~ "O
.g
~ QJJ6Al880.3l
~~ teeJ 31 ~ ~~ t:H "lz
-. 0 tll O ~
s:: ~
~ 't ~ > 0 Sf
""J "O II)
~ ~ 't teeJ teeJ"'
t,,,. .. ~ >-'l ::i::, ~
- 7' ~ S' ~Z" 'CJ ()mA
~.-. .::::0 :
I C)' >e 1' ;:i: :::! z ("l =i:r
..... c,, ~ > t"' iir
...... I :::! t"' teeJ "O
. _,: > j
- !a ::i::, ~
tll tll .,
~~~
o;:;
6 ~ ~ :=:, >-'l i::,
..,. l.y ~ teeJ> i;,*
"O >-'l ::t 0*..... Q 0 .... ..i.
\0 ..... .... ::i::, 0~
'o c:, .., z
'-1 §
-C::: ,~
~
~
't i~
15
(/)
COHESIONLESS GENERAL Fl LL Q)
C:
~ 10
- , Minimum Dr required= 65%
0 0
eQ) 5 z
o-,--------+------------1-...__......__.._.,.__._____,.._..___.....,
50 70 90 II 0 130 150 Relative Density Dr%
6 - - _,.
C/l COHESIVE GENERAL FILL Q)
<.J Minimum Cy-require d=90%
C:
0 4
<.J 0
0 0
Q)
.c E
- , 2 - ..--
z 0 I 105*
I 85 89 93 97 101 Degree of Compaction Cr %
Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Histograms ofRelative Density and Degree of Compaction Values Obtained in General Fill Figure D(J)-5-12 10/04/99
Stand ard penet ration resist ance N, blows /ft 250 30C
-i--. .---- -L-- ---- '---- ---- -IL- ---- ---- -'--- ---- --'-- ---- -'
0 50 100 150 200 0
Standar d penetra tion Average relotil
-lest perform ed in densHy requi 0 In-situ compac ted material and structur al till below el 830 75
() Structu ral fit 1 bttwttn
- o* *
- el 830 and el 855 80
- Structu ral fil I above el 85!5 85 0
2 In-situ soi I containi ng cloy and/or oroonic matter f
Q.
4 CJ *
- > ()
- --u 5
UJ 6
0 7
5-Re lotive density, Or%
0 8
Nebrask a Public Power District COOPE R NUCLEAR STATIO N UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPOR T (USAR)
Results of Standar d Penetration Tests in Verification Borings Figure D(l) 13 10/04/99
NED GENERAL MGII.
NED DEPUTY DIVISION GE.NUALM;ft.
NID NS&NII-QA APED NUCLEAR ff&IIO MFIIO SYSTEM MGII. GE.HERAL IIGR. l'!!OlfCT Q:IOE!W.. IIICR. MGII. GENERAL IICI!. Dll!IER
'NUCLEAR
- DEVfLOl'>tENT MARKETING DESIGN fMCJM:ERING
. MARKETING
. ENG.
- SYSTEMS P.IIOJECTS I. ENG MGII IICR MGII. P!OCUREMENT IIGII.
- , ll(lj!
QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY QUALi!* QUALIT'r ENGINEERED
. POWEi! l'LANT COICTIIOI. CONTROL _CONTROL CONTROi ASSUIIAIIC[ l'ftOJECTS EQUll'lll:NT MGR SP[CIALIST$ IIGR IICII IIGII UGI!. MGR Cj
~~
~
r.,,l D£f1NITIONS l'IIOJECTS QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY CONTROL PROJECT l'IIOCUIIED l'IIOCUREO t:H"l z NED
- NUCUAR ENERGY DIV1SIDH lll!OWlfS ftRIIY l i II Ill EQUIP,ICNT EQUIPMENT MGR
~ t12 0 (0 COOPEII .. GIIOUP I GROUP 11 Rfl.RD - REACTOR FUELS l IIEPl!OCfSSING DEPAl!TllENl
~~ >0 O" A/'£D
- ATOMICtJWEI! £OUIPMENTDEl'Al!TTl£NT LIIIEll!CK . AND II i:::'f; '"'l '"C;: HID NUCLEAR INSTIIUMENTATION DEl'Al!TlolENT l'f.ACH IIOTTOII II ANO 111 r.,,lr.,,lr,, 1'11.GIIIM
~ ~ R&FIIO IIEACTOR I. FUELS MANUFACTURING OPERATION i-3 ::i:qr NS&l!Wl'I VfllllON'. fANK~ f t, ;:: QU1',L11'" CONTROL ~IT(
-< z '"C QA NUCUAII SAFETY & 11'11!1 QUALITY ASSURANCE 01'£R1',l1DH QIJALITY COHTROL EQUIPMENT
~C) > SYSTEMS tHSTALl.ATION RlS!C'lft\l z Cj('1 = O" NOTE TH£ 1111ft QUALITY COUNCIL CONSISTING Of REPRESENTATIVES FRON KEY OIIGAHIZA TIOHAL COMt'OIIEHTS
- 11s CHAIIIED av SPECIALISTS MOIi MGf:
.~
9'
...... ::::~
- t"'~ THE MANAGER BWR QUALIH ASSURANCE
~- ~:~ DENOTES RECEIVING PROJECT ORIENTED AOMINISlllATIV[ r-----------J
~ tll :;::, ~ I GUIDANCE. TECHNICAL SUPEIIVISIOH IS DENOTED IIY THE SOLID LINE. I 0 5" ri.l tll ~
c5 :::: :;::, i-3 t::, Q:JALi'T\' STAftT-uf'
+>- a r.,,l > i;;* CONTROL TfCHNICAl &
\0 Y".l '"C >-3 !:t t- Sill Tf.ST
- i. SF'fCIAL
- su
\0 ~ R£PRE5tt.l:T1vt SPECIALISTS
~
o:;::, -0
>-3 z
~
~ '2
~
~
CONSTRUCTION TEST Burns & Roe Cons truct ion Mana geme nt Info Manu factu rers Revie w Oper ating NPPD Site Revie w Proj ect Mana geme nt De artme nt Repr esen tativ e Revie w Appr ove Burns & Roe Issue Test s En ineer in DE OPED Oper ating Depa rtmen t Burns & Roe-CM Coor dinat e GE-S ite Mana er Cont racto Burn s & Roe Engi neeri ng Qual ity Assu rance Perfo rm Test s PE RMED Oper ating Burns & Roe Engi neeri ng Manu factu rers Depa rtmen t Proj ect Mana geme nt Burn s & Roe - Con-struc tion Mana emen t Eval uate Data Acce ptanc e or Re ectio n Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCL EAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Construction Test Figure D(l)-7 -1 10/04/99
NPPD Assistan ce PRE-OP & START-UP TEST G.E. For Pre are Burns & Roe NSS Systems Engineer ing Manufac turers Review Op.er,atin g NPPD Sit.e Represen tative Pro ect Mana ement De artme Review Approve Issue Tests G.E.-On NSSS Burns & Roe Aux. Interfac es
-* DEVELOPED Burns & Roe
&R-Cons truction Coordina te Mana ement eo11-ttac tt,r1/4 Support G.E, On Nuclear
, Manufac turer As Required Forward Results
.. _n_ __
P.E.....~RME Burns & Roe Engine*e ring Manufact ure**
Project Managem ent G.E. On NSS S stems valuate Data Acceptan ce or Rejectio n Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Pre-Op and Start-Up Test Figure D(l)-7-2. 10/04/99
NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT COOPER NUCLEAR STATION PRE-OPERATIONAL TEST NO.
TI~LE: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
PREPARED BY:
REVISION: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____;DATE: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
PROCEDURE APPROVAL: AUTHORIZATION TO PERFORM:
Plant Test and Operations Manager, Burns and Roe (BOP) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date (or) Date Operations Manager, General Electric (NSSS)
Date Date Station Superintende nt, Nebraska Public Power District Date Date CERTIFICATION.. .OE:.-TES.T...COMPLETION This test has been conducted in accordance with this procedure.
Date Test Engineer Date Pre-Op. Test Engr. Date Test Engineer Burns and Roe (BOP) General El~ctric (NSSS) N.P.P.D.
CERTIFICATION OF TEST RESULTS This test has been satisfactori ly completed and the system and equipment have met the requirements contained herein~
Exceptions:
Date Generation Engrg. Date Station Superintende nt Date
~~~ineering (Site) sand Roe - BOP N.P .P .D. (Site) Cooper Nuclear Station Operations Mgr. Date General Electric - NSSS Nebraska Public Power District COOPER NUCLEAR STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (USAR)
Pre-Operational Test Procedure Cover Sheet Figure D(l)-7-3. W/04/99