05000259/FIN-2013005-03: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
| identified by = NRC
| identified by = NRC
| Inspection procedure = IP 71111.11
| Inspection procedure = IP 71111.11
| Inspector = A Sengupta, C Kontz, D Dumbacher, J Bartley, L Pressley, M Riches, R Baldwin, T Stephenr, Baldwin T, Stephen A, Sengupta C, Kontz D, Dumbacher J, Bartley L, Pressley M, Riche
| Inspector = A Sengupta, C Kontz, D Dumbacher, J Bartley, L Pressley, M Riches, R Baldwin, T Stephenr, Baldwint Stephen, A Sengupta, C Kontz, D Dumbacher, J Bartley, L Pressley, M Riches
| CCA = N/A for ROP
| CCA = N/A for ROP
| INPO aspect =  
| INPO aspect =  
| description = The NRC identified two examples of an Apparent Violation of 10 CFR 50.9, Completeness and accuracy of information, for the licensees apparent failure to provide complete and accurate information associated with emergency response on-shift staffing requirements. Specifically, on two occasions the licensee apparently provided inaccurate information to the NRC concerning onsite emergency response organization minimum staffing requirements. The licensee augmented on-shift staffing levels on October 30, 2013. These issues were entered into the Browns Ferry corrective action program as PERs 790109, 790092, and 801057. These apparent violations had the potential to impede or impact the regulatory process, and therefore subject to traditional enforcement as described in the NRC Enforcement Policy, dated July 9, 2013. Because these apparent violations involved the traditional enforcement process with no underlying technical violation that would be considered more than minor in accordance with IMC 0612, a cross-cutting aspect was not assigned to this violation.  
| description = The NRC identified two examples of an Apparent Violation of 10 CFR 50.9, Completeness and accuracy of information, for the licensees apparent failure to provide complete and accurate information associated with emergency response on-shift staffing requirements. Specifically, on two occasions the licensee apparently provided inaccurate information to the NRC concerning onsite emergency response organization minimum staffing requirements. The licensee augmented on-shift staffing levels on October 30, 2013. These issues were entered into the Browns Ferry corrective action program as PERs 790109, 790092, and 801057. These apparent violations had the potential to impede or impact the regulatory process, and therefore subject to traditional enforcement as described in the NRC Enforcement Policy, dated July 9, 2013. Because these apparent violations involved the traditional enforcement process with no underlying technical violation that would be considered more than minor in accordance with IMC 0612, a cross-cutting aspect was not assigned to this violation.  
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 19:49, 20 February 2018

03
Site: Browns Ferry Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Report IR 05000259/2013005 Section 1R11
Date counted Dec 31, 2013 (2013Q4)
Type: AV:
cornerstone Emergency Prep
Identified by: NRC identified
Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.11
Inspectors (proximate) A Sengupta
C Kontz
D Dumbacher
J Bartley
L Pressley
M Riches
R Baldwin
T Stephenr
Baldwint Stephen
A Sengupta
C Kontz
D Dumbacher
J Bartley
L Pressley
M Riches
INPO aspect
'