ML092020349: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML092020349 | | number = ML092020349 | ||
| issue date = 08/13/2009 | | issue date = 08/13/2009 | ||
| title = | | title = Request for Additional Information Regarding the Upgrade of Emergency Core Cooling System Requirements Per NUREG-1431 | ||
| author name = Lingam S | | author name = Lingam S | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 | ||
| addressee name = Swafford P | | addressee name = Swafford P | ||
| addressee affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority | | addressee affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority | ||
| docket = 05000327, 05000328 | | docket = 05000327, 05000328 | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555*0001 August 13, 2009 Mr. Preston D. Swafford Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 3R Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555*0001 August 13, 2009 Mr. Preston D. Swafford Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 3R Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 -REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE UPGRADE OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS PER NUREG-1431 (TAC NO. ME1115 AND ME1116) | SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE UPGRADE OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS PER NUREG-1431 (TAC NO. ME1115 AND ME1116) | ||
==Dear Mr. Swafford:== | ==Dear Mr. Swafford:== | ||
By letter dated April 21,2009, you submitted an application for license amendment to revise the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN) Technical Specifications (TSs), and upgrade the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) requirements to be more consistent with NUREG-1431, Revision 3, "Standard Technical Specifications | By letter dated April 21,2009, you submitted an application for license amendment to revise the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN) Technical Specifications (TSs), and upgrade the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) requirements to be more consistent with NUREG-1431, Revision 3, "Standard Technical Specifications - Westinghouse Plants." The upgrade revises SQN TS Section 3/4.5.2, "ECCS Subsystems - T avg Greater Than or Equal to 350 of,'' TS Section 3/4.5.3, "ECCS Subsystems - Tavg Less Than 350 of,'' and the corresponding surveillance requirements (SRs) that will resolve a nonconforming condition associated with SR 4.5.2.f. | ||
-Westinghouse Plants." The upgrade revises SQN TS Section 3/4.5.2, "ECCS Subsystems -T avg Greater Than or Equal to 350 of,'' TS Section 3/4.5.3, "ECCS Subsystems - | The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is required to complete its evaluation. This request was discussed with Mr. Rusty Proffitt of your staff on August 13, 2009, and it was agreed that a response would be provided within 30 days from the date of this letter. | ||
This request was discussed with Mr. Rusty Proffitt of your staff on August 13, 2009, and it was agreed that a response would be provided within 30 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at 301-415-1564. | If you have any questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at 301-415-1564. | ||
Sincerely, Siva P. Lingam, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-327 and 50-328 | Sincerely, | ||
~~~'~ | |||
Siva P. Lingam, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-327 and 50-328 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv | |||
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES AND UPGRADE OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS PER NUREG-1431. REVISION 3 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-327 AND 50-328 By letter dated April 21, 2009 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML091120193). the Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee), submitted a license amendment request to revise the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN) | |||
REVISION 3 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-327 AND 50-328 By letter dated April 21, 2009 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML091120193). | Technical Specifications (TSs) and upgrade the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) requirements to be more consistent with NUREG-1431, Revision 3, "Standard Technical Specifications - Westinghouse Plants." The upgrade revises SQN TS Section 3/4.5.2, "ECCS Subsystems - Tavg Greater Than or Equal to 350 of,'' TS Section 3/4.5.3, "ECCS Subsystems Tavg Less Than 350 of,'' and the corresponding surveillance requirements (SRs) that will resolve a nonconforming condition associated with SR 4.5.2.f. In order to complete its review of the above document, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff needs the following additional information: | ||
the Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee), submitted a license amendment request to revise the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN) Technical Specifications (TSs) and upgrade the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) requirements to be more consistent with NUREG-1431, Revision 3, "Standard Technical Specifications | : 1. Numerous statements in the submittal used phrases such as, "standard language," | ||
-Westinghouse Plants." The upgrade revises SQN TS Section 3/4.5.2, "ECCS Subsystems - | "standard action requirements," "standard surveillance," "standard title," etc. Please confirm whether the term "standard" used in such phrases implied Improved Standard Technical Specifications (ISTS). If any of those statements did not mean ISTS, then clarify. | ||
-2 analyses and ASME [American Society of Mechanical Engineers] | : 2. In page E-4 of the submittal, the Iicensee's proposed change to SR 4.5.2.b states, "Verify ECCS piping is full of water by venting the ECCS pump casings and accessible piping high points ...." Please provide the following additional information: | ||
Section XI test criteria. | a) Define the phrase "full of water." Does this mean zero voids? If not, what is the acceptance criterion for void dimension and what is the basis for that? | ||
Although compliance with SR 4.5.2.f is being met, surveillance testing of the EGGS pumps is being performed in accordance with ASME Section XI inservice inspection requirements, in accordance with TS 4.0.5." Please provide the following additional information: Discuss the minimum pump performance requirements that were credited in the SON safety analyses, and the above mentioned nonconservatism in the current SR 4.5.2.f discharge pressure values for the safety injection pumps and the centrifugal charging pumps. Discuss how compliance with ASME Section XI in-service testing criteria ensured that the safety analyses minimum performance requirements are satisfied. As part of the modification of the SON EGGS TS, several SRs, such as SR 4.5.2.c, SR 4.5.2.g, and SR 4.5.2.h, items have been relocated to plant procedures. | b) In light of the proposed TS Change No. 07-05 for SQN ECCS, discuss your plan to implement the NRC Generic Letter (GL) 2008-01, "Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems," for SQN, including modification of the TSs and the SRs, to make the plant consistent with the GL requirements related to ECCS voids. | ||
The NRG staff believes that relocating an item from the TSs to plant procedures is a significant relaxation of the required action from the standpoint of regulatory enforcement because plant procedures are licensee controlled actions. Please justify why it was necessary to relocate the SR items from the TSs to plant procedure, when the same task was being performed under the TSs, without any problem. | : 3. In page E-1 of the submittal, it was stated, "SR 4.5.2.f contains specific pump discharge pressure requirements for emergency core cooling system (ECCS) quarterly minimum flow recirculation testing. The discharge pressure values for the safety injection pumps and the centrifugal charging pumps are non-conservative to ensure that the performance of the ECCS pumps is consistent with the minimum performance credited by the plant safety Enclosure | ||
August 13, 2009 Mr. Preston D. Swafford Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 3R Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 -REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE UPGRADE OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS PER NUREG-1431 (TAC NO. ME1115 AND ME1116) | |||
-2 analyses and ASME [American Society of Mechanical Engineers] Section XI test criteria. | |||
Although compliance with SR 4.5.2.f is being met, surveillance testing of the EGGS pumps is being performed in accordance with ASME Section XI inservice inspection requirements, in accordance with TS 4.0.5." Please provide the following additional information: | |||
a) Discuss the minimum pump performance requirements that were credited in the SON safety analyses, and the above mentioned nonconservatism in the current SR 4.5.2.f discharge pressure values for the safety injection pumps and the centrifugal charging pumps. | |||
b) Discuss how compliance with ASME Section XI in-service testing criteria ensured that the safety analyses minimum performance requirements are satisfied. | |||
: 4. As part of the modification of the SON EGGS TS, several SRs, such as SR 4.5.2.c, SR 4.5.2.g, and SR 4.5.2.h, items have been relocated to plant procedures. The NRG staff believes that relocating an item from the TSs to plant procedures is a significant relaxation of the required action from the standpoint of regulatory enforcement because plant procedures are licensee controlled actions. Please justify why it was necessary to relocate the SR items from the TSs to plant procedure, when the same task was being performed under the TSs, without any problem. | |||
August 13, 2009 Mr. Preston D. Swafford Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 3R Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE UPGRADE OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS PER NUREG-1431 (TAC NO. ME1115 AND ME1116) | |||
==Dear Mr. Swafford:== | ==Dear Mr. Swafford:== | ||
By letter dated April 21, 2009, you submitted an application for license amendment to revise the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN) Technical Specifications (TSs), and upgrade the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) requirements to be more consistent with NUREG-1431, Revision 3, "Standard Technical Specifications | By letter dated April 21, 2009, you submitted an application for license amendment to revise the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN) Technical Specifications (TSs), and upgrade the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) requirements to be more consistent with NUREG-1431, Revision 3, "Standard Technical Specifications - Westinghouse Plants." The upgrade revises SQN TS Section 3/4.5.2, "ECCS Subsystems - Tavg Greater Than or Equal to 350 of,'' TS Section 3/4.5.3, "ECCS Subsystems - T avg Less Than 350 of,'' and the corresponding surveillance requirements (SRs) that will resolve a nonconforming condition associated with SR 4.5.2.f. | ||
-Westinghouse Plants." The upgrade revises SQN TS Section 3/4.5.2, "ECCS Subsystems - | The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is required to complete its evaluation. This request was discussed with Mr. Rusty Proffitt of your staff on August 13, 2009, and it was agreed that a response would be provided within 30 days from the date of this letter. | ||
This request was discussed with Mr. Rusty Proffitt of your staff on August 13, 2009, and it was agreed that a response would be provided within 30 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at 301-415-1564. | If you have any questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at 301-415-1564. | ||
Sincerely, IRA! Siva P. Lingam, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-327 and 50-328 | Sincerely, IRA! | ||
Siva P. Lingam, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-327 and 50-328 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION: | Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION: | ||
PUBLIC LPL2-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 RidsNrrPMSequoyah RidsNrrLACSola RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrDorlDpr RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR RidsNrrDssSrxb RidsRgn2MailCenter MRazzaque, SRXB ADAMS Accession No: ML092020349 | PUBLIC LPL2-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 RidsNrrPMSequoyah RidsNrrLACSola RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrDorlDpr RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR RidsNrrDssSrxb RidsRgn2MailCenter MRazzaque, SRXB ADAMS Accession No: ML092020349 . db>y memo date d transmltte OFFICE LPL2-2/PM LPL2-2/LA NRR/DSS/SRXB/BC LPL2-21BC NAME SLingam CSoia GCranston TBoyce DATE 08/13/09 7122109 7/21/09* 08/13/09 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy}} |
Latest revision as of 00:18, 22 March 2020
ML092020349 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Sequoyah |
Issue date: | 08/13/2009 |
From: | Siva Lingam Plant Licensing Branch II |
To: | Swafford P Tennessee Valley Authority |
Lingam, Siva NRR/DORL 415-1564 | |
References | |
TAC ME1115, TAC ME1116 | |
Download: ML092020349 (3) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555*0001 August 13, 2009 Mr. Preston D. Swafford Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 3R Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
SUBJECT:
SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE UPGRADE OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS PER NUREG-1431 (TAC NO. ME1115 AND ME1116)
Dear Mr. Swafford:
By letter dated April 21,2009, you submitted an application for license amendment to revise the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN) Technical Specifications (TSs), and upgrade the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) requirements to be more consistent with NUREG-1431, Revision 3, "Standard Technical Specifications - Westinghouse Plants." The upgrade revises SQN TS Section 3/4.5.2, "ECCS Subsystems - T avg Greater Than or Equal to 350 of, TS Section 3/4.5.3, "ECCS Subsystems - Tavg Less Than 350 of, and the corresponding surveillance requirements (SRs) that will resolve a nonconforming condition associated with SR 4.5.2.f.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is required to complete its evaluation. This request was discussed with Mr. Rusty Proffitt of your staff on August 13, 2009, and it was agreed that a response would be provided within 30 days from the date of this letter.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at 301-415-1564.
Sincerely,
~~~'~
Siva P. Lingam, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES AND UPGRADE OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS PER NUREG-1431. REVISION 3 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-327 AND 50-328 By letter dated April 21, 2009 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML091120193). the Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee), submitted a license amendment request to revise the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN)
Technical Specifications (TSs) and upgrade the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) requirements to be more consistent with NUREG-1431, Revision 3, "Standard Technical Specifications - Westinghouse Plants." The upgrade revises SQN TS Section 3/4.5.2, "ECCS Subsystems - Tavg Greater Than or Equal to 350 of, TS Section 3/4.5.3, "ECCS Subsystems Tavg Less Than 350 of, and the corresponding surveillance requirements (SRs) that will resolve a nonconforming condition associated with SR 4.5.2.f. In order to complete its review of the above document, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff needs the following additional information:
- 1. Numerous statements in the submittal used phrases such as, "standard language,"
"standard action requirements," "standard surveillance," "standard title," etc. Please confirm whether the term "standard" used in such phrases implied Improved Standard Technical Specifications (ISTS). If any of those statements did not mean ISTS, then clarify.
- 2. In page E-4 of the submittal, the Iicensee's proposed change to SR 4.5.2.b states, "Verify ECCS piping is full of water by venting the ECCS pump casings and accessible piping high points ...." Please provide the following additional information:
a) Define the phrase "full of water." Does this mean zero voids? If not, what is the acceptance criterion for void dimension and what is the basis for that?
b) In light of the proposed TS Change No. 07-05 for SQN ECCS, discuss your plan to implement the NRC Generic Letter (GL) 2008-01, "Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems," for SQN, including modification of the TSs and the SRs, to make the plant consistent with the GL requirements related to ECCS voids.
- 3. In page E-1 of the submittal, it was stated, "SR 4.5.2.f contains specific pump discharge pressure requirements for emergency core cooling system (ECCS) quarterly minimum flow recirculation testing. The discharge pressure values for the safety injection pumps and the centrifugal charging pumps are non-conservative to ensure that the performance of the ECCS pumps is consistent with the minimum performance credited by the plant safety Enclosure
-2 analyses and ASME [American Society of Mechanical Engineers] Section XI test criteria.
Although compliance with SR 4.5.2.f is being met, surveillance testing of the EGGS pumps is being performed in accordance with ASME Section XI inservice inspection requirements, in accordance with TS 4.0.5." Please provide the following additional information:
a) Discuss the minimum pump performance requirements that were credited in the SON safety analyses, and the above mentioned nonconservatism in the current SR 4.5.2.f discharge pressure values for the safety injection pumps and the centrifugal charging pumps.
b) Discuss how compliance with ASME Section XI in-service testing criteria ensured that the safety analyses minimum performance requirements are satisfied.
- 4. As part of the modification of the SON EGGS TS, several SRs, such as SR 4.5.2.c, SR 4.5.2.g, and SR 4.5.2.h, items have been relocated to plant procedures. The NRG staff believes that relocating an item from the TSs to plant procedures is a significant relaxation of the required action from the standpoint of regulatory enforcement because plant procedures are licensee controlled actions. Please justify why it was necessary to relocate the SR items from the TSs to plant procedure, when the same task was being performed under the TSs, without any problem.
August 13, 2009 Mr. Preston D. Swafford Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 3R Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
SUBJECT:
SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE UPGRADE OF EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS PER NUREG-1431 (TAC NO. ME1115 AND ME1116)
Dear Mr. Swafford:
By letter dated April 21, 2009, you submitted an application for license amendment to revise the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (SQN) Technical Specifications (TSs), and upgrade the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) requirements to be more consistent with NUREG-1431, Revision 3, "Standard Technical Specifications - Westinghouse Plants." The upgrade revises SQN TS Section 3/4.5.2, "ECCS Subsystems - Tavg Greater Than or Equal to 350 of, TS Section 3/4.5.3, "ECCS Subsystems - T avg Less Than 350 of, and the corresponding surveillance requirements (SRs) that will resolve a nonconforming condition associated with SR 4.5.2.f.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is required to complete its evaluation. This request was discussed with Mr. Rusty Proffitt of your staff on August 13, 2009, and it was agreed that a response would be provided within 30 days from the date of this letter.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at 301-415-1564.
Sincerely, IRA!
Siva P. Lingam, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-327 and 50-328
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC LPL2-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 RidsNrrPMSequoyah RidsNrrLACSola RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrDorlDpr RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR RidsNrrDssSrxb RidsRgn2MailCenter MRazzaque, SRXB ADAMS Accession No: ML092020349 . db>y memo date d transmltte OFFICE LPL2-2/PM LPL2-2/LA NRR/DSS/SRXB/BC LPL2-21BC NAME SLingam CSoia GCranston TBoyce DATE 08/13/09 7122109 7/21/09* 08/13/09 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy