ML14129A278: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML14129A278
| number = ML14129A278
| issue date = 05/09/2014
| issue date = 05/09/2014
| title = NRC Staff'S Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 and 4 License Amendment Request LAR-229 to Adopt TSTF-425 (TAC Nos. MF3931 and MF3932)
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - NRC Staff'S Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 and 4 License Amendment Request LAR-229 to Adopt TSTF-425
| author name = Klett A
| author name = Klett A
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
Line 23: Line 23:
==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NRC Staffs Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 and 4 License Amendment Request LAR-229 to adopt TSTF-425 (TAC Nos. MF3931 and MF3932)
NRC Staffs Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 and 4 License Amendment Request LAR-229 to adopt TSTF-425 (TAC Nos. MF3931 and MF3932)
By letter dated April 9, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No.
By letter dated April 9, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML14105A042), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested a license amendment for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. This email provides the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this application.
ML14105A042), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested a license amendment for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. This email provides the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this application.
The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff concluded that the application provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff concluded that the application provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence.

Latest revision as of 21:54, 19 March 2020

NRR E-mail Capture - NRC Staff'S Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 and 4 License Amendment Request LAR-229 to Adopt TSTF-425
ML14129A278
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/09/2014
From: Audrey Klett
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Tomonto B
Florida Power & Light Co
References
MF3931, MF3932
Download: ML14129A278 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Klett, Audrey Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 7:45 AM To: Cross, William (WILLIAM.CROSS@fpl.com); Tomonto, Bob (Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com);

'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)

Subject:

NRC Staffs Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 and 4 License Amendment Request LAR-229 to adopt TSTF-425 (TAC Nos. MF3931 and MF3932)

By letter dated April 9, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML14105A042), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested a license amendment for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. This email provides the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this application.

The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff concluded that the application provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-0489.

Audrey Klett Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 301-415-0489 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1273 Mail Envelope Properties (Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov20140509074400)

Subject:

NRC Staffs Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 and 4 License Amendment Request LAR-229 to adopt TSTF-425 (TAC Nos. MF3931 and MF3932)

Sent Date: 5/9/2014 7:44:45 AM Received Date: 5/9/2014 7:44:00 AM From: Klett, Audrey Created By: Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Cross, William (WILLIAM.CROSS@fpl.com)" <WILLIAM.CROSS@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None "Tomonto, Bob (Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com)" <Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None

"'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1699 5/9/2014 7:44:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: