ML20008D575: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of the above request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of the above request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the license amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the license amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the license amendment request will take approximately 450 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete the review of the licensing action by January 2021. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the license amendment request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::450 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete the review of the licensing action by January 2021. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delays may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delays may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | ||
Latest revision as of 05:49, 2 March 2020
| ML20008D575 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 01/08/2020 |
| From: | Booma Venkataraman NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL3 |
| To: | Offerle M DTE Electric Company |
| References | |
| L-2019-LLA-0270 | |
| Download: ML20008D575 (3) | |
Text
From: Venkataraman, Booma Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 10:07 AM To: Margaret M Offerle Cc: Salgado, Nancy
Subject:
RE: ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: Fermi 2- LAR to Revise Technical Specification for Secondary Containment Surveillance Requirements (EPID: L-2019-LLA-0270)
Expires: Sunday, March 8, 2020 12:00 AM Correction below.
From: Venkataraman, Booma Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2020 4:46 PM To: Margaret M Offerle <margaret.offerle@dteenergy.com>
Cc: Salgado, Nancy <Nancy.Salgado@nrc.gov>
Subject:
ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: Fermi 2- LAR to Revise Technical Specification for Secondary Containment Surveillance Requirements (EPID: L-2019-LLA-0270)
Ms. Offerle, By letter dated December 6, 2019 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML19340A088), DTE Electric Company (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) in accordance with 10 CFR 50.90 to make changes to the Technical Specifications (TS) Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.6.4.1.1, to address conditions during which the secondary containment pressure may not meet the SR pressure requirements. In addition, this LAR proposes to change SR 3.6.4.1.3 to acknowledge that secondary containment access openings may be open for entry and exit. An administrative change is also proposed for SR 3.6.4.1.5. The proposed changes are similar to those identified in the TS Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-551 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16277A226) and approved by the NRC (ADAMS Accession No. ML17236A365).
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of the above request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the license amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the license amendment request will take approximately 450 hours18.75 days <br />2.679 weeks <br />0.616 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete the review of the licensing action by January 2021. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delays may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2934.
Sincerely, Booma Booma Venkataraman, P.E.
Project Manager, NRR/DORL/LPL3 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Booma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov 301.415.2934
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DRMA Email Number: 378 Mail Envelope Properties (MN2PR09MB4000520E146631E9748BDD16863E0)
Subject:
RE: ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: Fermi 2- LAR to Revise Technical Specification for Secondary Containment Surveillance Requirements (EPID: L-2019-LLA-0270)
Sent Date: 1/8/2020 10:07:24 AM Received Date: 1/8/2020 10:07:00 AM From: Venkataraman, Booma Created By: Booma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Salgado, Nancy" <Nancy.Salgado@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Margaret M Offerle" <margaret.offerle@dteenergy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: MN2PR09MB4000.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3895 1/8/2020 10:07:00 AM Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: 3/8/2020