ML18151A671

Rev 0 to Surry Unit 2 Cycle 12 Startup Physics Tests Rept. W/930723 Ltr

ML18151A671
Person / Time
Site:	Surry
Issue date:	06/30/1993
From:	Trace D VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
93-443, NE-943, NE-943-R, NE-943-R00, NUDOCS 9307290150
Download: ML18151A671 (62)

Text

Al,.; l,.;..l!,L.1!,.KA J. ~.U .UV\., U lV.i..Cll~ J. . J.J J.~ .1.KJ.D U .1 .1 V l "t ~ l. ~ .1. ..c,1\'.1.

REGULA~Y. I~fORMATION DISTRIBUTIO.,YSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9307290150 DOC.DATE: 93/06/30 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET#

FACIL:50-281 Surry Power Station, Unit 2, Virginia Electric & Powe 05000281 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION TRACE,D.A. Virginia Power (Virginia Electric & Power Co.)

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION I

SUBJECT:

Rev Oto "Surry Unit 2 Cycle 12 Startup Physics Tests Rept."

W/930723 ltr.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE26D COPIES REC~IVED:LTR .1_ ENCL~ SIZE: ~ /

I TITLE: Startup Report/Refueling Report (per Tech Specs)

...c; NOTES:lcy NMSS/SCDB/PM. 05000281 I

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES p ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD2-2 PD 1 1 BUCKLEY,B 2 2 I

INTERNAL: ACRS 5 5 AEOD/DSP/TPAB 1 1

~,LSRXB 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 [

~!~ 02 1 1 RGN2 FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 s

NOTES: l 1 R

I D

s I

A C

C NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT TIIE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, s ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION I.JSTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 16 ENCL

.F

/0

f VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 July 23, 1993 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No.93-443

~ttention: Document Control Desk NL&P/CGL RO Washington, D. C. 20555 Docket Nos. 50-281 License Nos.

• DPR-37 Gentlemen:

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS REPORT As required by Surry Technical Specification 6.6.A.1, enclosed are five (5) copies of the Virginia Electric and Power Company Technical Report NE-943, Revision 0, entitled "Surry Unit 2, Cycle 12 Startup Physics Tests Report." This report summarizes the results of the physics testing program .performed after initial criticality of Cycle 12 on May 4, 1993. The results of the physics tests were within the applicable Technical Specification limits.

Very truly yours,

~Id~

M. L. Bowling, Manager Nuclear Licensing & Programs Enclosures - Surry Unit 2, Cycle 12 Startup Physics Tests Report (5 copies) cc: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.

Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. M. W. Branch NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station 9307290150 930630

~DR ADOCK 0500~~:1 fl

~

. . . . . _,.~ -.:-¥~:.-.:. ,,

,

:~~l

• C  :)51: L,

. *.*:q:

/:~,

~

i TECHNICAL REPORT NE-943 - Rev. 0 SURRY UNIT 2, CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS REPORT NUCLEAR ANALYSIS AND FUEL NUCLEAR ENGINEERING SERVICES VIRGINIA POWER JUNE 1993

,r\ r*-,/1

( Jr,,.~-* . } , ~ ., .' I ,*.,.,.,~

PREPARED BY :__;,~--=---v__;;_"'"'..a=a::'-':.._"'_-_._ ..... ~ , ;;J D. A. Trace . Date REVIEWED BY: dJl,._.. ~lls-b,_Q~l,/Jl,t:13 A.Ysvr::!I REVIEWED BY: ___ ~-=-..._-..._'-"-~.:~----'=- ~

/J--..l...

D. C. Lawrence d ~~::,k, Date APPROVED BY: 2> ~<".'.'. . ~h*h3 D*. Dz.i' i:iosz Date QA Category: Nuclear Safety Related Keywords: SPS2, S2C12, Startup

• CLASSIFICATION/DISCLAIMER The data, techniques, information, and conclusions in this report have been prepared solely for use by. Virginia Electric and Power Company (the Company), and they may not be appropriate for use in situations other than those for. which they have been specifically prepared. The Company therefore makes no claim or warranty whatsoever, express or implied, as to their accuracy, usefulness, or applicability.

• In particular, THE COMPANY MAKES NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NOR SHALL ANY WARRANTY BE DEEMED TO ARISE FROM COURSE OF DEALING.

OR USAGE OF TRADE, with respect to this report or any of the data, techniques, information, or conclusions . in it. By making this report available, the Company does not authorize its use by others, and any such use is expressly forbidden except with the prior written* approval of the Company. Any such written approval shall itself be deemed to incorporate the disclaimers of liability and .disclaimers of warranties provided herein. In no event shall the Company be liable, under any legal theory whatsoever ( whether contract, tort, warranty, or strict or absolute liability), for any property damage, mental or physical injury or death, loss of use of property, or other damage resulting from or arising out of the use, authorized or unauthorized,

• of this report or the data, techniques, information, or conclusions in it.

NE-9.43 S2C12 Startup Physics. Tests Report Page 1 of 58

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Classification/Disclaimer ............... ." ...............

• 1 Table of Contents ....... *. . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 List of Tables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 List of Figures ........ ~ . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Preface ..................................... ; ..........*. . 5 Section *1 Introduction and Summary................... 7 Section 2 Control Rod Drop T~me Measurements ........ ; 17 Section 3 Control Rod Bank Worth Measurements........ 22 Section 4 Boron Endpoint and Worth Measurements...... 27 Section 5 Temperature Coefficient Measurement........ 31 Section 6 Power Distribution Measurements............ 33 Section 7 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 41 APPENDIX. Startup Physics Test Results and Evaluation Sheets........................ 42

\....

NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report

• Page 2 of 58

• LIST OF TABLES TABLE TITLE PAGE

1. 1 Chronology of Tests ......................... _........ *... 11 2.1 Hot Rod Drop Time Summary............................. 19 3.1 Control Rod Bank Worth Summary ................... ~.... 24 4.1 Boron Endpoints Summary............................... 29 5.1 Isothermal Temperature Coefficient Summary............ 32 6.1 Incore Flux Map Summary............................... 35 6.2 Comparison of Measured Power Distribution Parameters With Their Technical Specification Limits............. 36 NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 3 of 58

• LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE . TITLE PAGE

1. 1 Core J;.oading Map .......-......................_....... *. . . . . . 12

1. 2 Beginning of Cycle Fuel Assembly Burnups. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

1. 3 Incore Thimble Locations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 1.4 _Burnable Poison *and Source Assembly Locations............ 15

1. 5 Control Rod Locations ............... *......... *. . . . . . . . . . . . - 16

2. 1 Typica 1 Rod Drop Trace. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.2 Rod Drop Time-. Hot Full Flow Conditions................. 21 3.1 Bank B Integral Rod Worth -. HZP.......................... 25 3.2 Bank B Differential Rod Worth - HZP...................... 26 4.1 Boron Worth Coefficient.................................. 30 6.1 Assemblywise Power Distribution - 30% Power .............. 37 6.2 Assemblywise Power Distribution - 57% Power .............. 38 6.3 Assemblywise Power Distribution - 90% Power .............. 39 6.4 Assemblywise .Power Distribution - 100% Power ............. 40 NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 4 of 58

PREFACE This report presents the analysis and evaluation of the physics tests which were performed to verify that the Surry 2, Cycle 12*core could be operated safely, and makes an initial evaluation of the performance o~

the core. It is not the intent of this report to discuss the particular methods of testing or to present the detailed data taken. Standard test techniques and methods of data analysis were used. The test data, results, and evaluations, coupled with the detailed *startup procedures, are on file at the Surry Power Station. Therefore, only a cursory discussion of these items is included .in this report. The analyses presented include a brief summary of each test, a comparison of the test results with design predictions, and an evaluation of the results.

The Surry 2, Cycle 12%Startup Physics Test Results* and Evaluation Sheets are included as an appendix to provide additional information on the startup test results. Each data sheet provides the following information: 1) test identification, 2) test conditions (design), 3) test conditions (actual), 4) test results, 5) acceptance criteria, and 6) comments concerning the test. These sheets provide a compact summary of the startup* test results in a consistent format. The design test conditions and design values at these design conditions for the measured parameters were completed prior to the startup physics testing. The entries for the design values were based on the calculations performed by Virginia Electric and Power Company's Nuclear Analysis and Fuel Group 1

• During the tests, the data sheets were used as guidelines both to verify that the proper test conditions were met and to facilitate the NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 5 of 58

preliminary comparison between measured and predicted test resulrs, thus enabling.a quick identification of possible problems occuring during the tests.

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 6 of 58

~

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION AND

SUMMARY

On March 6, 1993 Surry Unit 2 shut down for its eleventh refueling.

During this shutdown, 69 of the 157 fuel assemblies in the core were replaced with 68 fresh assemblies and one once-burned assembly. The Cycle 12 core consists of eight sub-batches of fuel: two fresh batches (batches 14A and 14B); three once-burned *batches, two from Cycle 11 (batches 13A and 13B) and one from Surry 1 Cycle 6 (batch Sl/8B); and three twice-burned batches, all from Cycles ~O

• and 11 (batches 12A, 12B and 12C). The core loading pattern and the design parameters for each sub-batch are shown in Figure 1.1. Beginning-of-cycle (BOC) fuel assembly burnups are given in Figure 1.2. The incore thimble locations available during startup physics testing are identified in Figure 1.3. Figure 1.4 identifies the location and number of burnable poison rods and secondary source locations for Cycle 12, while Figure 1.5 identifies the control rod locations.

During system pressurization prior to initial criticality, it was discovered that a pressurizer safety valve (PSV) began . simmering near normal operating pressures (2235 psig)°, causing the loop seal to not completely form, which resulted in the valve leaking., A safety analy_sis was performed which showed that operation at 2135 psig ( 100 psi below

.6 normal operating pressure) was acceptable. The safety evaluation and applicable Technical Specification changes were verbally presented to the NRC with approval obtained *prior to the initial startup. Written NE-943

• S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 7 of 58

confirmation from the NRC was received shortly thereafter. 7 After the appropriate reactor trip setpoints were reset to compensate for the lower operating pressure, the Cycle 12 core achieved initial criticality at 2101 on May 4, 1993. Following criticality, startup physics tests. were performed as outlined in Table 1.1.

Even though the physics tests were performed at approximately 2135 psig, the physics predictions, which were calculated assuming an operating pressure of 2235 psig, were not modified. Op~rating at 100 psi below normal operating conditions has a negligible impact on physics parameters. Therefore, changes to the design predictions were not deemed necessary. A summary .of the physics test results follows.

1. The measured drop time of each control rod was within the 2 .4 second limit of Technical Specification j.12.c.1.

2. The reference control rod bank was measured with the dilution method, and the result was within 2.3% of the design prediction.

Individual control rod bank worths were measured using the rod swap technique 2 a 3 and the results were within 6.9% of the design predictions. The sum of the individual measured control rod bank worths was within 1.7% of the design prediction. These results are within the design tolerance of +/-15% for individual bank worths

(+/-10% for the rod swap reference bank worth) and the design tolerance of +/-10% for the sum of the individual control rod bank WOJ."ths.

3. Measured critical boron concentrations for two control bank configurations were within 51 ppm of the design predictions. The NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 8 of 58

all-rods-out

• (ARO) result was not within the 50 ppm design tolerance, but met the Technical Specification 4.10.A criterion that the overall core reactivity balance shall be within +/-1%. Ak/k of the design prediction. Further analysis was performed to confirm the boron misprediction had no adverse affect on the safety analysis 4

• The reference bank in critical boron concentration was within its design tolerance.

4. *The boron worth coefficient measurement was within 1.4% of the design predict.ion, which is within the design tolerance of +/-10%.

5. The measured isothermal temperature coefficient ( ITC) for the aH-rods-out configuration was within O .41 pcm/°F of the design prediction. This result is within the design tolerance of +/-3 pcm/°F. The measured ITC was -0.77 pcm/°F. When the Doppler temperature coefficient (-1.69 pcm/°F) and a 0.5 pcm/°F uncertainty are accounted for in the +3.0 pcm/°F MTC limit of Technical Specification 3.1.E.1, the MTC requirement is satisfied as long as the ITC is less than 0.81 pcm/°F.*

6. Measured core power distributions were within established acceptance criteria and Technical Specification limits~

Generally, the measured core power distribution was within 2.0%

of the design predictions. The heat flux hot channel factors, F-Q(Z), and enthalpy rise hot channel factors, F-DH(N),

• were within the limits of Technical Specification Section 3.12.B.1.

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 9 of 58

In summary,

• all startup physics test results were acceptable.

Detailed results, specific design tolerances and acceptance criteria for each measurement are presented in the fol_lowing sections of this report.

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 10 of 58

-~.. ...

Table 1.1 SURRY 2 - CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS CHRONOLOGY. OF TESTS Reference Test Date Time Power Procedure Hot Rod Drop - Hot Full Flow 4/30/93 0340 HSD 2-NPT-RX-007 Zero Power Testing Range 5/ 4/93 2219 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Reactivity Computer Checkout 5/ 4/93 2311 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Boron Endpoint* - ARO 5/ 5/93 0315 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Temperature Coefficient - ARO 5/ 5/93 042.4. HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Bank B Worth 5/ 5/93 0620 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Boron Endpoint - B in 5/ 5/93 0930 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Bank D Worth - Rod Swap 5/ 5/93 1020 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Bank C Worth - Rod Swap 5/ 5/93 1118 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Bank A Worth - Rod Swap 5/ 5/93 1207 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008.

Bank SB Worth - Rod Swap 5/ 5/93 1229 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Bank SA Worth - Rod Swap 5/- 5/93 1307 HZP 2-NPT-RX-008 Flux Map - 30% Power 5/ 6/93 0902 29.7% 2-NPT-RX-002 Peaking Factor Verification 2-NPT-RX-005

& Power Range Calibration Flux Map - 57% Power 5/ 8/93 0703 57.2% 2-NPT-RX-002 Peaking Factor Verification 2-NPT-RX-005

& Power Range Calibration Flux Map - 90% Power 5/ 9/93 1246 89.9% 2-NPT-RX-002 Peaking Factor Verification 2-NPT-RX-005

& Power Range Calibration Flux Map - 100% Power 5/29/93 0653 99.9% 2-NPT-RX-002 Peaking Factor Verification 2-NPT-RX-005

& Power Range Calibration NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 11 of 58

• --\,.-. .

Figure 1.1 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 CORE LOADING MAP p IC J H G F E D C I A R N

" L I 12A I 13.A 12A I I 1114 I OV3 I IUD I 1

- - ~ - 1 ~ _ 1 _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _-,-_ _

I l2B I 13A I lltA I 13.A I 14A I 13.A I l2B *1 I 3U9 I 1V3 I DWI I ZV7 I 1119 I 1V7 I SUD I 2

_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1~_1 _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _

I l2B I 14A I l4B I 131 I l4B I 138 I l4B I 14A I 1211 I I 5Ul I OWB I *SU2 I 5V2 I 4W5 I 4VO I 6115 I lW3 I 3U7 I 3

_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1~_1 _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _

I l2B I l3B I l4B I 1311 I l4B I 13A I l4B I 138 I l4B I 138 I l2B I I 3UO I 5V7 I 3119 I 3V3 I 6W7 I lVl I 5W7 I 4V8 I 4W6 I 3V4 I 4U9 I 4

_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1~_1 _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _

I l2B I 14A I 148 I l3B I 141 I 138 I 14A I 138 I 148 I 138 I 148 I 14A I 128 I l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~I 5 1_ _ 1_ _ ._1 _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1~_1 _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_._1~_1 I 13A I 148 I 13B I 141 I llA I 14A I 13A I 14A I 13A I 148 I 138 I 14B I 13A I I 2V4 I 5Wl I 6VO I 4W7 I 1119 I lW4 I 2VI I 2W8 I 2V5 I 5W6 I 6Vl I 6110 I 2V3 I 6

_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1~_1 _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_*_ _ 1~_1 _ _

I lZC I 14A I 13B I 148 I 13B I 14A

• I 13A I 14A I 13A I 14A I l3B I l4B I l3B I 14A I lZA I

• I SU3 I 1W2 I SV5 I 4W9 I 4V2 I 2W5 I DV4 I 3W2 I OY7 I 3WO I 4V3 I 4Wl I 4V5 I 1116 I oua I 7 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ , _ _ , _ _ 1 I 13A I 13A I 148 I 13A I 14A I 13" I 14A ISl/88 I 14A I 13A I 14A I 13A I 148 I 13A I 13A I I 2VO I 1V5 I 3W4 I OV6 I 1W7 I ovs I 2119 I 4Cl I 1W5 I OV2 I 2W4 I OVl I 4W2 I lVO I 1V2 I 8 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I 12A I 14A I 13B I 1411 I 13B I 14A I 13" I 14A I 13A I 14A I 138 I 1411 I 1311 I 14A I 12A I I OU9 I 2ND I 4V9 I 4W3 I 3V8 I OW4 I 2'19. I 2W2 I 2Y2 I 2W6 I 5Vl I 3W6 I 3YS I 2W3 I lU8 I 9

, _ _ , _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ ,_._1 _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I 13A I 148 I 13B I l4B I 13" I 14A I 13A I 14A I 13A I 148 I 138 I 14B I 13A I I 3Vl I 6W2 I 5VO I 6W6 I 3VO I 1W8 I 2V8 I 3Wl I DV9 I 4WO I 4Vl I 6W8 1*3v2 I 10 1_ _ , _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I 128 I 14A I 148 I 13B I l4B I 138 I 14A I 138 I l4B I 13B I 148 I 14A I 128 I l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~l~I 11

, _ _ 1_ _ , _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ , _ _ 1_ _ , _ _ 1_ _ , _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ ,

I 12B I l3B I 148 I 13B I 1411 I 13A I l4B I 13B I 148 I 1311 I l2B I I 4U5 I 3V9 I 4W4 I 5V6 I 5119 I JV4 I 5W5 I 4V6 I 5W3 I 4V7 I 4U2 I 12 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ , _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ , _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I l2B I 14A I l4B I 1311 I 148 I 13B I 148 I 14A I 128 I I 2U9 I 0119 I 6W4 I 6V2 I 3W7 I 5V8 I 5W8 I 2Wl I 4Ul I 13 1_ _ 1 ~ - 1 ~ _ 1 _ _ 1_ _ , _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ *1 I lU I 13" I lltA I 13" I lltA I 13" I lU I I 3U2 I OV8 I 2W7 I 2V6 I lWl I 1V6 I 4U4 I 14 1_ _ 1 ~ - 1 ~ _ 1 _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I 12A I 13A I 12A I I *I--> BATCH I lUI I IVB I 1U9 I 15 I 1--> ASSENBLY ID 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ ,

I__ I Fl£L ASSEMBLY DESIGN PARAMETERS

. SUB-BATCH Sl/88 12A 1211 12C 13A l3B 14A 141 INITIAL ENRICHMENT 3.40 3.79 4.00 3.80 3.81 4.00 3.81 4.00 (W/0 U-235)

BURNUP AT BOC 12 ll348 32950 39661 33819 24142 21067

• 0 0 (ltllD/MTUJ ASSEMBLY TYPE 15xl5

• 15Xl5 15Xl5 15Xl5 15Xl5 15Xl5 15Xl5 15Xl5 NUMBER OF ASSEMBLIES l 7 16 l 32 32 32 36 FUEL RODS PER ASSEMBLY 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 204 NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 12 of 58

• Figure 1.2 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 BEGINNING OF CYCLE FUEL ASSEMBLY BURNUPS p G F E B A R N

" l K .J H D C I 1U4 I DV3 lUO I 328131 243991 327S6I l

--~--'--'--'--'-----

' 3U9 I 1V3 I 0111 I 2V7 I 1119 I 1V7 I 5UO I I 415921 244S6I 11 244791 OI 247981 412721 2

' 5Ul I 0118 I 382911 ol I 5W2 I 5V2 I 4115 I 4VO I 6115 I 1113 I 3U7 I OI 193471 OI 185981 OI DI 375811 3

' 3UO I 5V7 I 3119 I 3V3 I 6117 I lVl I 5117 I 4V8 I 4116 I 3V4 I 4119 I I 379781 221961 OI 192751 OI 228331 OI 197671 DI 227111 372861 4

' 4118 I OW6 I 3W5 I 5V9 I 6W3 I 6V3 I OW7 I 419951 OI OI 230231 OI 230931 I" 5V4 I 6111 I 4V4 I 3W3 I OW2 I 3U6 I OI 236441 OI 220181 OI OI 411861 5 I 2V4 I 5111. I 6VO I 4117 I 1V9 I 242991 OI 193821 OI 240081 f 1W4

• I 2Vl I 2118 I 2V5 OI 240071 OI 239191 I 5116 I 6Vl I 6110 I 2V3 I OI 192381 OI 245401 6

' 5U3 I 1112 I 5V5 I 4119 I 4V2 I 2115 I OV4 I 3W2 I OV7 I 3110 I 4V3 I 4111 I 4V5 I 1116 I 0118 I I 338191 OI 183761 OI 233901 OI 241871 OI 244111 OI 230441 OI 190011 OI 329991 7 I 2VO I 1V5 I 3114 I OV6 I 1117 I DV5 I 2119 I 4Cl I 1115 I OV2 I 2114 I DVl I 4W2 I lVO I 1V2 I I 246311 243391 DI 229561 DI 239781 OI 113481 DI 243831 DI 226801 DI 244931 241721 8 I DU9 I 2ND I 4V9 I 4113 I 3V8 I DW4 I 2V9 I 2112 I 331101 DI 189001 DI 235061 OI 239981  : ol I 2V2 I 2116 I 5Vl I 3116 I 3V5 I 2113 I lU8 I 241031 OI 239071 I 3Vl I 6112 I 5VO I 6116 I 3VO I 1W8 I 2V8 I 3Wl I OV9 I 4WO I 4Vl I 6W8 I 3V2 I DI 186021 DI 333201 9 I 248741 DI 193831 ol 240111 DI 246991 OI 239001 DI 197171 DI 245271 _10 I 4U7 I 0115 I 5W4 I 3V6 I 4118 I 6V4 I OW3 I 3V7 I 5WO I 5V3 I 3118 I lWO I 4U3 I I 416061 OI DI 223161 OI 235881 DI 235421 DI 228711 OI OI 413241 11 I 4U5 I 3V9 I 4114 I 380311 226261 I 5V6 I 5119 I 1V4 I 5W5 ol 200171 OI 229841 ol I 4V6 I 5W3 I 4V7 I 4U2 I 193741 DI 223021 379771 12 I 2U9 I 0119 I 375691 I 6114 ol

• I 6V2 I 3W7 I 5V8 I 5118 I ZIil I 4Ul I OI 186531 OI 186881 OI GI 378121 13 I 3U2 I OV8 I 2117 I .ZV6 I 1111 I 1V6 I 4U4 I I 417721 244111 OI 240681 DI 241641 413001 14 I lUl I 1V8 I 1119 I I 330791 248521 325751 15 1--> ASSENBLY ID I 1--> ASSENBLV BURNUP (NIID/NTUI NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 13 of 58

• *~,

Figure I. J SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 INCORE THIMBLE LOCATIONS p N L K H G F E D C a A R

" .J I

I I IT I I 1 I --..---'--'--'--'---:---

I I I I I I I I

_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ I I IT I I Z I I I I

• I I I I I I

. I IT I I I IT I IT. I I I I IT I 3

_ _ 1_ _ 1_*_._1 _ _ . 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_._1 _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _

I . I I I I I I I I I I I

_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_IT_ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_IT_ 1_ _ 1_IT_ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_*__ 1_ _

I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I

• I I I I I I I I I I I I 1I _ _ 1I _IT_ 1I _ _ 1I _IT_ 1I _ _ 1l _IT_ 1I _ _ 1I _ _ 1I _ _ 1I _IT_ 1I _IT_ 1I _ _ 1I _IT_ 1I 5 I *1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IT I I I IT I I IT I I I I . I 6

_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1__._1 _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I1_ _ I1_ _ I 1_ IT_I1_ _ I1_ _ I1_ _ I 1_ IT _I1_ _ I 1_IT _I1_._1I _ _ I ,_IT_I1_ _ I 1_ IT

_I1_ _ I, 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

_1I_ ITI

_ 1_ _ 1l°ITI _ _ 1_ _ 1I_ ITI

_ 1_ _ 1I _ _ 1I _ _ 1I _ _ I 1_ ITI

_ 1_ _ 1I _ _ I 1_ITIITI

_ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1I _ _ 1I _ __I1_ _ 1I _ _ 1I _IT_ 1I _ _ 1I _ _  : 1I _ _ I, _IT_ I, _IT_ 1I _ _ 1 I_ _ 1 I _ _ I, _ _ 1 I _IT_ 1I 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IT I I I I IT I I I- I I IT I I IT I 10 I __ . _I_*__ 1_ _ 1_*__ I _ _ I _ _ I _ _ I _ _ I _ _ I _ _ I _ _ I _ _ I _ _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IT I I I IT I I IT I IT I I I I 11 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_*_ _ , _ _ 1_ _ , _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ , _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ , _ _ 1 I I I. I I I I I I I I I 1I _IT_ 1I _ _ ,I _ _ I, _ _ 1_* I IT I

_ 1 _ _ 1I _ _ 1I _ _ 1I _ _ 1I _IT_ 1I _IT_ 1I lZ I I . I I I

• I I I I I I, _ _ 1 I_ _ 1 I_ _.I1_ _ I 1_ H_I1_ _ 1I_ IT_I1_ _ 1I _ _ 1I 13 I I I I I I I I I IT I I I I IT I I I 14 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I I I I IT - Incore Thi*ble I IT I I I 15 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1

• - Unavailable Location NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 14 of 58

Figure 1.4 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 BURNABLE POISON AND SOURCE ASSEMBLY LOCATIONS p F D I A R H

" L K J H G E. C I

I I I I l I

I I

I I

I I

I I I I z I

l~l~I IIPZ54 IBPZ:58 I l~I IIPZIO I l~l~I IIPZ39 IIPZ56 I I

I 3 I

--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'~-

I I

IZDP I 1BPZ4D I IZOP I IIPZZZ I IZDP 1-l1PZZ3 I IZDP I IIPZ41 I I

I I

I 1 --'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'-- I I SS4 I 4P I ZDP I 1BPZ55 IBPZ4Z I I ZOP I IBPZ30 I I ZOP I 1BPZ06 I I ZOP I IIPZ31 I I ZOP I 4P I 1BPZ43 1BPZ57 I I

5 l _ _ l _ _ l _ _ l _ _ l _ _ l _ _ l _ _._l _ _ l _ _ l _ _ l _ _ l ~ _ I _ _ I I I ZOP I I ZOP I I ZOP I I ZOP I I ZOP I I ZOP I I I IBPZ44 I I BPZlZ I I BP214 I I 1P215 I I BP233 I I BP245 I I 6

~-'--'-~'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'-~'--'-~

,__ ,__ ,__ ,__ ,__ ,__ ,__.,__ ,__ ,__ ,__ ,__ ,~-'--'--'

I I I I ZOP I I ZOP I I 16P I I ZOP I I ZOP I I I I I I I 1BPZZ4 I IIPZ16 I IBPZOZ I IBPZ17 I 1BPZZ5 I I I I 7 I I I ZOP I I ZOP I I 16P I I 16P I I ZDP I I ZOP I I I I I IBPZll I IIPZ07 I IIPZ03 I IIPZ04 I IIPZ08 I 1BP21Z I I I 8

'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'-~'--'-~'

I I I I ZOP I I ZOP I I 16P

• I I ZDP I I ZOP I I I I

,__ ,__ ,__ ,__ ,__ ,__ ,__ ,_*__ '--'--'--'--'*-~'--'-~'

I SS3 I

• I I

I ZOP I IBP2Z6 I I ZOP I l1P218 I I ZOP I 1BPZ05 I I ZOP I IIPZ19 I I ZOP I IBPZZ7 I I ZOP I I I SS5 I*

I 9 I I BPZ46 I I 1PZl4 I

• 1BPZZO I I BPZZl I I BPZ35 I I BPZ4 7 I I 10

'--'--'--'--'--'--'~-'--'--'--'--'-~'--'

I I

I 4P I 20P I 1BPZ60 IBPZ48 I I ZOP I IIPZ36 I I ZOP I IBPZ09 I I ZOP I l11PZ37 I I ZOP I 4P I l1PZ49 IBPZ58 I I

. I 11

'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'--'-~'--'

I I

I I

• I ZOP I IBPZ50 I I ZOP I IBPZZII I I 20P I IBPZZ9 I I ZOP I IBPZ51 I I

I I

I IZ I I 4P I ZOP I I ZDP I I ZOP I 4P I I I IBPZ61 IBPZ5Z I IBPZ13 I IBP25l IIPZ59 I I 13 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I 14 4P - 4 BURNABLE POISON ROD CLUSTER I

I I

I I

I I

I 15 16P ZOP SSx

- 16 BURNABLE POISON ROD CLUSTER

- ZO BURNABLE POISON ROD'CLUSTER

- SECONDARY SOURCE xxP or SSx BPIU _,

- I OF BP RODS or SECONDARY SOURCE ID

- BP ASSEHBLY ID NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 15 of 58

Figure 1.5 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 CONTROL ROD LOCATIONS p .J H G F E D C 8 A R N

" L IC 180° I

Loop A I I I I Loop C 1 Outlet . I_._I __ I __ I Inlet 9i:: I I A. I ID I I A I I / 2

~_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_.

N-41 I I I I SA I I SA I I SP I I N-43 3

-.-1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_

I I c I I B I I I I B I I c I I 4

_1_1_*_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_

I I SP I I SB I I SP I I I I SB I I I I 5 1_1_1_1_1_1_._1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1 IAI IBI IDI ICI IDI IBI IAI 6 Loop A _ _ I __ I_._I __ I __ I __ I __ I __ I __ I __ I __ I __ I __ I __ I__ Loop C Inlet I I I SA I I I

• I SB I I SB I I SP I I SA I I I Outlet 7

\1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1 ,,

90°- I ID I I I I c I I I I c I I I ID I I~ 210° 8 I _ I _ I _ I _ I _ I _ I _ I _ I _ I _ I _ I _ I _ I _ I _ .I I I I SA I I SP I I SB I : I SB. I I I I SA I I

• I 9 1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_*_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1 I A I* 1B I ID I I c I ID I I B I I A I 10 1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1 I I I I SB I I I I SP I I SB I I SP I I 11 l_l_l_l_l_l_._l_*I_I_I_I_I_I_I I I c I I B I I I I B I I c I I 12 1_1_1_1_*_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1 I ISPI ISAI ISAI I I I 13 N-44 I __ I __ I __ I __ I __ I __ I __ I __ I __ I .N-42 I I A I I D .I I A I I 14 1_1_1_1_1_1_1_1 Loop B~

15 II __ II __ II __ II "Loop B Absorber Outlet *Inlet Naterial I Ag-In-Cd 00 Function Number of Clusters Control Bank D 8 Control Bank C 8 Control Bank B 8 Control Bank A 8 Shutdown Bank SB 8 Shutdown Bank SA 8 SP (Spare Rod Locations) 8 NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 16 of 58

• SECTION 2 CONTROL ROD DROP TINE HEASUREHENTS The drop time of each control rod was measured at hot full-flow reactor coolant system (RCS) conditions (Tavg of 547+/-5°F) in order to verify that the time from initiation of the rod drop to the entry of the rod into the dashpot was less than or equal to the.maximum allowed by Technical Specification 3.12.C.l. Even though this test was performed at approximately 2100 psig, which is 135 psi below normal operating pressures, the test conditions .were performed near the actual cycle operating pressure of 2135 psig. The slightly lower testing condition RCS pressure would not impact any results presented here.

The rod drop times were measured by withdrawing a bank to its fully withdrawn position, and removing the movable and stationary gripper coil

~:

fuses for the particular rod to be...dropped. This allowed the rod to drop into the core as it would during a plant trip. The stationary gripper coil voltage and the Individual Rod Position Indication (!RPI) primary coil voltage signals were recorded to determine the rod drop time. This procedure was repeated for each control rod.

As shown on the sample rod drop trace inF.i:gure 2.1, the initiation of the rod drop is indicated by the decay of the stationary gripper coil voltage- when the stationary gripper coil fuse is removed. As the rod drops, a voltage is induced in the !RPI primary coil. The magnitude of this voltage is a function of control roci velocity. As the rod enters the dashpot region of the guide tube, its velocity slows causing a voltage decrease in the IRP~ coil. This voltage reaches a minimum when the rod NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 17 of 58

"i._ ..

reaches the bottom of the dashpot.

Subsequent variations in the trace are caused by rod bouncing.

The measured drop times for each control rod are recorded on Figure

.2.2. The slowest, fastest, and average drop times are summarized in Table 2 .1. Technical Specification 3 .12. C .1 specifies a. maximum* rod drop time from loss of stationary gripper coil voltage to dashpot entry of 2.4 seconds with the RCS at hot, full flow conditions. The test results satisfied this limit.

NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 18 of 58

• Table 2.1 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS HOT ROD DROP TIME

SUMMARY

ROD DROP TIME TO DASHPOT ENTRY SLOWEST ROD FASTEST RODS AVERAGE TIME M-06 F-06 1.38 sec. C-07 1.24 sec. 1.28 sec.

P-06 NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 19 of 58

• Figure 2.1 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS TYPICAL ROD DROP TRACE au rn a a....

(II pi&IIJ OI Fnl UIIUIIMT--,

I

---

~------.....---------+Sllllarlll,Grmoar COl'Ma;eT,..

.ROD CROP TIME MEASUREMENT NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 20 of 58

• Figure 2.2 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS ROD DROP TIME - HOT FULL FLOW CONDITIONS p ,N l K J H G F C R

" E D B A I I I I I I I l

- - - , - - - - l _ _ l _ _ l_*_I _ _ _ __

I I I I I I I I I 1.za I I l.Z6 I I l.3Z I I 2

_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.2s I I 1.29 I I I I 3

__ ._1 _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.26 I I 1.26 I I I I 1.2a I I 1.31 I I 4

_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _

I I I I I I I I

• I I I I I I I I I I 1.26 I I I I

• I I 1.zs I I I I s 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11.241 ll.Z41 ll.311 11.ZBI ll.381 ll.281 ll.321 6

_ _ 1_ _ 1_.__ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11.ZBI I I ll.291 ll.ZBI 1* I 1*1.241 I I 7 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l.Z7 I I I I 1.29 I I I I 1.29 I I I I 1.31 I I a 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l. 29 I I I I 1. 30 I . I l. 31 I I I I l. zs I I I 9 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_*_1 _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. 26 I I l. 27 I I 1. 29 I I 1.. 31 I I l. 31 I I 1. 26 I I 1. za I 10 1_ _ 1__._l_*_l _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.26 I I I I I I 1.21 I I I I 11 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I I

• I I I I I I I I I I I I l.Z6 I I l .ZS I I I I 1.31 I I l. 26 I I lZ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.21 I I 1.2a I I I I 13 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I I I I I I I I I ll.301 ll.Z61 ll.Z91 I 14 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ , _ _ 1_ _ 1_ _ 1 I I I I I I I I 15 1_ _ 1_ _ 1___ 1 I I IX.XX 1--> ROD DROP TINE TO DASHPOT ENTRY (SEC)

I__ I NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 21 of 58

• SECTION 3 CONTROL ROD BANK WORTH MEASUREMENTS Control rod bank worths were measured for the control* and shutdown banks using the rod swap technique 2 > 3

• The initial step of the rod swap method diluted the predicted most reactive control rod bank (hereafter referred to as the ret:erence bank) into the core and measured its reactivity worth using conventional test techniques. The reactivity changes resulting from the reference bank movements were recorded continuously by the reactivity computer and were used to determine the differential and integral worth of the reference bank. For Cycle 12, Control Bank B was used as the reference bank.

After the completion of the reference bank reactivity worth measurement, the reactor coolant system temperature and boron concentration were stabilized with the reactor just critical and the reference bank near full insertion. Initial statepoint data for the rod swap maneuver were obtained by moving the reference bank to its fully inserted position with all other banks fully withdrawn and recording the core reactivity and moderator temperature. From this point, a rod swap maneuver was performed by withdrawing the _reference bank several steps and then one of the

• other control rod banks (i.e. a test bank) was inserted to balance the reactivity of the reference ,bank withdrawal. This sequence was repeated. until the

• test bank was fully inserted .and the reference bank was positioned such that the core was just critical or near the initial statepoint reactivity. This measured critical position (HCP) of the reference bank with the test bank fully inserted was used to NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 22 of 58

determine the integral reactivity worth of the test bank.

• The core reactivity, moderator temperature, and the differential worth of the reference bank were recorded with the reference bank at the HCP. The rod swap maneuver then was repeated in reverse such that the reference bank again was fully inserted with the test bank fully withdrawn 'from the core.

This rod swap process was then repeated for each of the other control and shutdown banks.

A summary of the test results is given in Table 3*.1. As shown in this table and the Startup Physics Test Results and Evaluation Sheets given in the Appendix, the individual measured bank worths for the control and shutdown banks were within the design tolerance (+/-10% for the reference bank, +/-15% for test banks worth greater than 600 pcm, and +/-100 pcm for test banks worth less than or equal to 600 pcm). The sum of the individual measured rod ba:nk worths was within 1. 7% of the design prediction. This is well within the design tolerance of +/-10% for the sum of the individual control rod bank worths.

The integral and differential reactivity worths of the reference bank (Control Bank B) are shown in Figures 3.1 and 3.2, respectively.

The design predictions and the measured data are plotted together in order to illustrate their agreement. In summary, the measured rod worth values were satisfactory.

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 23 of 58

• Table J.1 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS CONTROL ROD BANK WORTH

SUMMARY

MEASURED PREDICTED PERCENT DIFFERENCE WORTH WORTH (%)

BANK (PCM) (PCM) (M-P)/P X 100 B-Re ference Bank 1539.0 1504.0 2.3 D 891.3 925.5 -3.7 C. 761.0 784.0 -2.9 A 317.6 341.0 -6.9*

SB 1005.9 1012.3 -0.6 SA 1098.5 1144.0 -4.0 Tota 1 Worth 5613.3 5710.8 * -1. 7

• The difference is less than 100 pcm.

\

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 24 of 58

Figure 3.1 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS BANK B INTEGRAL ROD WORTH - HZP ALL OTHER RODS WITHDRAWN I I I I I I I.  !  : I 1,500 I I I  ! I ' I I I , I

! I I 1,400 I I

I I

• "' I I

I I

I l.'

1,300 I I I I ' I 1111 I 7"--r-t I '\, I I  : I I I 1,200 l'I I I I I I I I i 1,100 I

I I

I I

11

. 11 I

I i

I

-a 1,000 I

I I 11 *

'\

l'1.

I I

Ill 900 '  ! I i i

I I

I ":\ I I i I I

c i I

I I i  ! I

. "'\ I i 800 ' '

'\

'I.'

I

'\.

II, I

i

~

I "\

700 I  ; i .....

ra:i  !

I I

I I ' I"\, I I  : I . :

E,'4

z. 600 I I I I"\! I 1-1 i

I  !

I I I I I i I

"\

i 1'1. I I

I I I 500 ' I I  !

I I I  ! ?\.' 1 i I i I I I I I  ;  ! * "  : I I  ; I I  ! I i I I '1. I I i I I I ,,: I I I 400 I  : I - I'\,.

' I

' I I  ! I  : 11..i i I

' 'I . ,i,"' I I I

' I I  : ' ' ! '"

300 I I  ; i I 1, I ' I I* . .,.  :

I I I I I

I 1,

I

' I i I"-

200 I I , I I I I I i I I i 1'.I

! I I I I I I I I  ! I ""'

I I I I I I I I 1*; "'-

100 ' I I i '

I I I i I

I I  !

I I

I I

l I

I I I I I l I I i I I

I I I I I I

I I

I I I I I  ! I I I I I I I I 0 ' ""

I I \ I I

I ' I I I 0 20 40 60 BO 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 BANK POSITION (STEPS)

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 25 of 58

• Figure 3.2 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 STA_RTUP PHYSICS TESTS BANK B DIFFERENTIAL ROD WORTH - HZP ALL OTHER RODS WITHDRAWN 14 Il I

p. \. I I ' II I!

'\ -

• I 12 I

! I 1 ' \  !

i i I i iI

\  !

I p,

~

10 I

! I en l;

I

! ' \ I p,

L 8

II: i \

E-1 I! '~ *

~  ! i !

I I ", II !

~ II I

I I '

i' I I I

- I H 6 - I E-1

z: I i ' i I I

I I i i

~ I i  : I I I

i l I r--

ii ... ,1 I

'"I !

i E

H I

' I I

I i i I

\s!

I Q

4 j I  :

\

I ii I

2 1,/

j I

II I

! i i I *

-11 I i I

~ i i I

. .v i i : I I  ! !

O* r I

. I I 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 BANK POSITION (STEPS)

NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 26 of 58

• SECTION 4 BORON ENDPOINT AND WORTH KEASUREHENTS Boron Endpoint With the reactor critical at hot zero power, reactor coolant. system (RCS) boron concentrations were measured at selected

• rod bank configurations to enable a direct comparison of measured boron endpoints.

with design predictions. For each critical boron concentration measurement, the RCS conditions were stabilized with the control banks at or very near a selected endpoint position. Adjustments to the measured critical boron concentration values were:made to account for off-nominal control rod position and moderator temperature, if necessary; The results of th~se measurements are given in Table 4.1. As shown in this. table and in the Startup Physics Test Results and Evaluation Sheets given in the Appendix, the measured all-rods-out (ARO) critical boron endpoint value was not within its design tolerance (+/-50 ppm), but did meet the requirements of Technical. Specification 4.10 .A regarding core rea~tivity balance. A review of the safety analysis was performed and showed that there were no adverse consequences resulting from the design tolerance not being met'. In summary, the boron endpoint results were satisfactory.

Boron Worth Coefficient The measured boron endpoint values provide stable statepoint data from which the boron worth coefficient or differential boron worth (DBW) was determined. By relating each endpoint concentration to the integrated NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 27 of 58

• rod worth present in the core at the time of the endpoint measurement, the value of the DBW over the range of boron endpoint concentrations was obtained.

A plot of the boron concentration versus inserted control rod worth is shown in Figure 4.1. As indicated in this figure and iri the Appendix, the measured DBW was -7.40 pcm/ppm. This is within 1.4% of the predicted value of -7 .30 pcm/ppin and is well within the design tolerance of +/-10%.

In summary, the measured boron worth coefficient was satisfactory.

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 28 of 58

• Table 4.1 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS BORON ENDP.OINTS SUHHARY Measured Predicted Difference Control Rod Endpoint Endpoint M-P Configuration (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)

ARO 1961 1910 +51 B Bank In 1753 1755* -2

• The predicted endpoint for the B Bank In configuration was adjusted for the difference between the measured and predicted values of the endpoint taken at the ARO configuration as shown in the boron endpoint Startup Phy~ics Test Results and Evaluation Sheet in the Appendix.

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 29 of 58

Figure 4.1 SURRY UNIT 2

• CYCLE.12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS BORON WORTH COEFFICIENT Measured DBW= -7.40 pcm/ppm 1,600

--- I 1,500 <x \

--- \ - i 1,400

! I i I I I

-- I I

1.,300 I I\ I 1,200

-- \ I ..

- II, 1,100

-- \

a *.

. 1,000 --

I.

"\

-t:

Di 900 .

800 i

I I I

\

\  : I

- I I

"\ i i I'

-- I E 700 I

I I

I I\ I I 1-4

~

,1 J f;! 600 -- I' 500

- I I I \ I I I

- I

-- I I I I I \ I 400 - "\

-- Ii I I I

300

! \ I

-- \

200 100

- I \

-- \

- I '

0 -. I I I I I I I I I I I II I II I

I I II I I I I II I I II I I'< .I I I I II I

I I II V

I I I BORON CONCENTRATION (PPM)

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 30 of 58

• SECTION 5 TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT MEASUREMENT The isothermal temperature coefficient (ITC) at the all-rods-out condition is measured by controlling the reactor coolant system (RCS) temperature* through varying the steam generator blowdown flow, establishing a constant heatup or.* cooldown rate,. and monitoring the resulting reactivity changes on the . reactivity computer. This test sequence includes a cooldown followed by a heatup.

Reactivity was measured during an RCS cooldown of approximately 5.6°F and an RCS heatup of 3.0°F. Rea.~tivity and temperature data was taken from the reactivity computer and strip chart recorders. Using the statepoint method, the temperature coefficient was determined by dividing the change in reactivity by the change in RCS temperature. An X-Y plotter, which plotted reactivity versus temperature, confirmed the statepoint method in calculating the measured ITC.

The predicted and measured isothermal temperature coefficient values are compared in Table 5.1. As can be seen from this summary and from the Startup Physics Test Results and Evaluation Sheet given in the Appendix, the measured isothermal temperature coefficient value was within the design tolerance of +/-3 pcm/°F. Accounting for the Doppler temperature coefficient (-1.69 pcm/°F) and a 0.5 pcm/°F uricert~,inty, the moderator temperature coefficient was 1.42 pcm/°F, which meets the requirements of Technical Specification 3.1.E.1. In summary, the measured result was satisfactory.

NE-943 S2Cl2 _Startup Physics Tests Report Page 31 of 58

. ... ***~

Table 5.1 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS ISOTHERMAL TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT

SUMMARY

CORE CONDITIONS ISOTHERMAL TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT (PCM/°F)

BANK TEMPERATURE BORON POSITION RANGE CONCENTRATION C/D H/U AVE. DIFFER.

(.OF) (ppm) MEAS. PRED. (M-P) 542.0 D/207 to 1958 -0.36 -1.17 -o. 77 -1.18 0.41 548.0 NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 32 of 58

• SECTION 6 POWER DISTRIBUTION MEASUREMENTS The core power distribution.s were measured using the movable incore detector flux mapping system. This system consists of five fission chamber detectors which traverse fuel assembly instrumentation thimbles depicted in Figure 1.3. For each traverse, the detector_ voltage output is continuously monitored on a strip chart recorder, and scanned for 61 discrete axial points by the PRODAC P-250 process computer. Full *core, -

three-dimensional power distributions are d.etermined from this data using the Westinghouse computer program, INCORE 5

• INCORE couples the measured voltages with predetermined analytic p~wer-to-flux ratios in order to determine the power distribution for the whole core.

A list of the full-core flux maps taken during the startup test program and the measured values of the important power distribution parameters are given in Table 6.1. A comparison of these measured values with their Techn.ical Specification limits is given in Table 6.2. Flux map 1 was taken at approximately 30% power to verify the radial power distribution (RPD) predictions at low power. Figure 6 .1 shows the measured RPDs from this flux map. Flux maps 2 through 4 were taken near 57%, 90% and 100% power, respectively, with different control rod configurations. These flux maps were taken to check at-power design predictions and to. .

measure core power distributions at various operating conditions. The radial power distributions for these maps are given in Figures 6.2 through 6.4. These figures show that the measured relative assembly power values were generally within 2.0% of the predicted values.

The measured F-Q(Z) and F-DH(N) peaking factor values for all flux maps NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 33 of 58

were within the limits of Technical Specification 3.12.B.1. AU maps were used to recalibrate the power range excore detectors.

In conclusion, the power distribution measurement results were considered to be acceptable with respect to the design tolerances, the accident analysis acceptance criteria, and the Technical' Specification limits. It is therefore anticipated that the core will continue to operate safely throughout Cycle 12.

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 34 *of 58

• TABLE 6.1 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS /

INCORE FLUX KAP.

SUMMARY

I I I I I I 1 I I z I I I 3 I I I BURNI I I F-QCZJ HOT I F-IIH<N> HOT I CORE FCZJ POWER I I I I NAP INAPI I UP I IBANK I CHANNEL FACTOR I CHIil.FACTOR I IIAX TILT I AXIAL I NO. I I DESCRIPTION IND.I DATE I IIWD/IPWRI D I I I I I OFF I OF I

.I I I I NTU ICZ) ISTEPSIASSYIPINIAXIAL I IASSYIPINIF-DHIN)IAXIAL I FCZJ I IIAX !LOCI SET ITHINI I I I I I I I I IPOINTIF-QCZJ I I I IPOINTI I I I CZJ IBLESI

• --:--=-:-==---'-'--='--'-'--'-'-'-*-'--'-'-'--'--'--'

I LOW POWER I P.F.V.

I 1 IS- 6-931 11 I 301 1S2 IF 41 OOI 50 I Z.340 IF 41 001 I.S54 I 30 ll.43911.0061 _1_ ,_

MEI _ 1_1

-3.661 I Z I s- a-931 za I S71 l6!i I Olli HII 30 I Z.llS I F 41 001 1.499 I 30 ll.33311.0031 NEI -3.Sll 40 I 44 I I P.F.V. I 3 I S* 9-931 S7 I 901 Z03 I F 41 001 26 I 1.942 I F 41 OOI 1.444 I 30 ll.ZSlll.0031 NEI +Z.371 41 I I FULL POWER I 4 I S-29-931 646 11001 ZZ4 I Olli HII 32 I 1.890 IF 41 001 1.424 I 31 11.zze11*.0011 NEI +O.Z71 46 I I I_I I_ _ I_I _ _ I _ I _ I _ _ I_ _ I _ I _ I _ _ I_ _ I_ _ I_ _ I_I _ _ I _ I NOTES: HOT SPOT LOCATIONS ARE SPECIFIED BY GIVING ASSENBLY LOCATIONS (E.G. Ha IS THE CENTER-OF-CORE ASSENBLYJ, FOLLOWED BY THE PIN LOCATION (DENOTED BY THE "Y" COORDINATE WITH THE FIFTEEN ROWS OF FUEL RODS LETTERED A THROUGH O AND THE "X" COORDINATE DESIGNATED IN A SINILAR NANNER).

IN THE "Z" DIRECTION THE CORE IS DIVIDED INTO 61 AXIAL POINTS STARTING FRON THE TOP OF THE CORE.

l. F-QCZJ INCLUDES A.TOTAL UNCERTAINTY OF 1.08.

Z. POWER TILT - DEFINED AS THE AVERAGE QUADRANT POWER TILT FRON INCORE.

3. P.F.V. - PEAKING FACTOR VERIFICATION

4. EACH NAP WAS USED TO PERFORlt A POWER RANGE EXCORE DETECTOR CALIBRATION.

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 35 of 58

• • Table 6.2 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS COMPARISION OF MEASURED POWER DISTRIBUTION PARAMETERS WITH .. THEIR TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION LIMITS PEAK F-Q(Z) HOT F-Q(Z) HOT F-DH(N) HOT CHANNEL FACTOR* CHANNEL FACTOR** . CHANNEL FACTOR

. (AT NODE OF MINIMUM MARGIN)

MAP MEAS LIMIT. NODE MEAS LIMIT .NODE MARGIN MEAS LIMIT MARGIN NO. (%) (%)

1 2.340 4.628 30 2.340 4.628 30 49.4 1.554 1.889 17. 7 2 2.115 4.048 30 2.115 .4.048 30 47.8 1.499 1.760 14.8 3 1.942 2.549 26 1.942 2.549 26 23.8 1.444 1.607 10.1 4 1.890 2.321 32 1.882 2.292 26 17.9 1.424 1.560 8.7

• The Technical Specification's limit for the heat flux hot channel factor, F:-Q(Z), is a function of core height and power level.

The values for F-Q(Z) listed are the maximum value of F-Q(Z) in the core. The Technical Spe~ification's limit listed above is evaluated at the plane of maximum F-Q(Z).

• • The value for F-Q(Z) listed above is the value at the plane of m1n1mum margin. The minimum margin values listed are the minimum percent difference between the measured values of F-Q(Z) and the Technical Specification's limit at that node for each map.

The measured F-Q(Z) hot channel factors include 8% total uncertainty.

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 36 of 58

• -~-.,..... -

Figure 6.1 SURRY UNIT 2 - -CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS ASSEMBLYWISE POWER DISTRIBUTION 30% POWER R p G II N

" L IC J H F E D C A PREDICTED

• o.za D.34 o.za. PREDICTED *

• IIEASURED *

• o.za

• o.34

• o.z8 .- IIEASURED

• PCT DIFFERENCE .*

• 1.0

• 0.5. 1.9 * .PCT DIFFERENCE *

• o.31. o.64. 1.ca. a.al 1.08. a.64. o.31

• o.33. o.63. 1.01. o.ao. 1.09. o.6(,. D.33. z

• 6.1 ** -1.4. -0.1. -o.a. 1.4. 3.z. 5.7 *

• o.38. 1.14. l.Z9. 1.za. 1.za. J.Z9. l.Z9. 1.14. o.38 *

• 0.40. 1.17. l.Z7. l.Z7. l.Z6. 1.30. 1.33. l.Zl

• D.41. 3

• 5.3. Z.l. -1.9. -1.4. -1.4. l.Z. 3.1

• 5.9. 9.6 *

• 0.38 . 0.88

• 1.35

• 1.38

• l.3Z

• l.Z3

• l.3Z . 1.38

• 1.35 * *o.88

• 0.38 .

• 0.40. 0.90. 1.34. 1.39. 1.35. l.Z4. 1.34. l.4Z. 1.40. 0.92. 0.39 .

. 6.1

• 1.7. -0.9. 0.7. Z.3. J.O. 1.3. Z.9 *. 3.4. 3.9. Z.7 *

. 0.31. 1.14. 1.35. l.Z8. 1.24 1.18. 1.17. 1.18. l.Z4. l.Z8 1.35. 1.14 0.31 *

• 0.31

• 1.15

• 1.34

• l.Z8

• I.ZS . l.Z3

• l.ZO

• l.ZO

• l.Z7

• 1.31

• 1.35

• 1.14

• 0.31

• 5

. -0.6. 0.6. -0.8. -o.o ~ 0.9. 4.Z. Z.8. 1.9. Z.5. z.z. -0.5. -a.a. -0.5 *

• 0.64 l.Z9. 1.38. 1.24. 0.99 1.06 1.05 1.06 0.99. 1.24 1.38 l.Z9 0.63 *

. 0.63. l.Z9. 1.37. l.ZZ. 1.00. 1.08. 1.07. 1.06. 1.01. 1.26. 1.38. l.Z6. 0.61

• 6

• -o.6*. -o.6. -a.a. -1.s. o.9. Z.6. 1.1 . o.3. 1.z, 1.s. D.4. -2.6. -3.3 *

• O.Z7

• l.D7

• l.Z9

• l.3Z

• 1.18

• 1.05

• 1.01

• 1.10

• Loz _- 1.06

• 1.18

• l.3Z

• l.Z8 . 1.07

• O.Z7 *

• O.Z7 . 1.os*. l.Z7

• 1.30 . 1.16

• 1.05 . 1.04

• 1.11 ; I.OZ . 1.06

• l.ZO

• l.Z6

• l.Z3*. 1.01

• O.Z6

• 7

. -0.7. -Z.l. -1.z. -1.a. -1.6. D.l. Z.4. 0.7. -0.8. 0.3. 1.4. -4.6. -4.3. -5.4. -4.4 *

. 0.34 . o,ao

• l.Z8 . l.ZZ

• 1.16

• 1.05

• 1.09

• 1.14 . l.lZ

• 1.06 . 1.17 . l.Z3 . l.Z8

• 0.80 . 0.34 *

. 0.32

• 0.78 . l.Z3 . l.ZO . 1.15

• 1.05

• 1.12

• 1.14 *. 1.11

• 1.06

• 1.17

• 1.17

• l.Z3 . 0.78

• 0.33

• 8

• -4.Z. ~z.a. -3.7. -1.6. -1.0. 0.4. Z.6. 0.6. -0.4. 0.3. -o.z. -4.6. -4.Z. -3.0. -3.5.

O.Z7. 1.06 l.Z7. 1.31. 1.18. 1.05. 1.01. 1.10. I.OZ. 1.06. 1.19 1.32. J.Z9. 1.07. 0.27

. O.Z5. 1.00. l.Zl. l.Z8. 1.18. 1.06. 1.03. 1.12. 1.02. 1.05. 1.19. 1.31 . l.Z6. 1.04. O.Z6. 9

. -6.4. -5.3. -5.4. -Z.3. ~-7. 0.6. Z.3. l.Z. *o.z. -1.Z. -0.l. -0.8. -Z.3. -3.l . -3.Z .

. 0.63. l.Z8. 1.37. 1.23. 0.99. 1.05. l.D5. 1.06-. 0.99. 1.24. 1.38. 1.30. 0.64 *

• 0.59. l.ZO. 1.34. l.Z5. 1.00. J.08. 1.07. 1.06. 0.99. J.Z4. 1.40. l.Z8. 0.61. 10

• -6.6. -6.7. -Z.l. 1.5. 1.8. Z.Z. 1.8. 0.0. -0.9. 0.1. 1.5. -1.2. -3.9 *

• o.31

• 1.-14

• 1.35 . 1.z1

• 1.24 . 1.1a . 1.16

• 1.18 . 1.z4

• 1.za

• 1.36

• 1.15

• o.31 .

• . 0.30

• 1.10 . 1.33

• 1.30 . 1.26 . 1.20

• 1.19 . 1.19

• 1.23

• 1.28 . 1.37

• 1.16 . 0.31

• 11

. -3.Z. -3.2. -1.l . 1.8. 2.0. Z.l. Z.l

• D.6. -0.7. 0.3. 1.3. 0.9. -0.7 *

. 0.37. 0.88. 1.35. 1.37. 1.32. l.Z3. 1.32. 1.38. 1.35. 0.89. 0.38 .

. 0.38. 0.89. 1.37. 1.40. 1.34. 1.25. 1.32. 1.36. 1.35. D.89. 0.39. 12

• 0;2. a.a. 1.1. 1.8. 1.a. 2.0. -o.3. -1.1 * -o.s. o.5. 3.7 *

• 0.37. 1.14. 1.29 .. J.Z9. 1.28. 1.28. 1.29. 1.14. 0.38 *

. 0.38. 1.18. 1.32. 1.31

• l.Z9. 1.27. l.Z7. 1.13. 0.38. 13 1.7. 3.2. 2.5. 1.8. 0.5. -1.5. -Z.l. -1.4. 1.6 *

• 0.31

• 0.64. 1.08. 0.81. 1.08. 0.64. 0.31 *

• 0.32. 0.66. 1.11. 0.81. 1.07. 0.63. 0.30. 14 .

• 3.2. 3.1. z.a. o.3. -1.0. -1.s. -2.3.

STANDARD

• 0.2a o.34

• e.za AVERAGE

• DEVIATION *

• 0.2a. o.35. o.z1. .PCT DIFFERENCE. 15

=l.667

• 2 .8 . l

• Z *. -o. 9 * =

• Z.D SuttNARY NAP NO: S2~12-0l DATE: 5/ 6/93 POWER: 29.77.

CONTROL ROD POSITIONS: F-QCZJ = 2.340 QPTR:

D BANK AT 152 STEPS F-DH(NJ = 1.554 NW 1.0010 NE 1.0058 F(ZJ = 1.439 SW 0.9969 SE 0.99&3 BURNUP = 11 tlWD/NTU A.O.= -3.664%

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 37 of*ss

• Figure 6.2 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS ASSEKBLYWISE POWER DISTRIBUTION 57% POWER R p H F B A N

" l I( .J G E D C PREDICTED *

• O.Z9. 0.37 0.30.

• PREDICTED *

• IEASURED

• O.Z9. 0.37. 0.30. *' IEASURED 1

• PCT DIFFERENCE. * -0.6. -0.9. -0.6. .PCT DIFFERENCE

• 0.3Z 0.65 1.10 0.85 1.10 0.65 0.3Z

• 0.34

• 0.64

• 1.09

• 0.84

• l.09

• 0.66

• 0.35

• z

• 6.6. -1.5 - -1.0. -1.5. -1.0. 1.4. 8.3 *

• o.38 1.13. 1.z1. 1.za. 1.za 1.za. 1.z1 1.13. o.38 *

. 0.40. 1.16. l.Z5. 1.Z7. 1.Z7. 1.ZB. l.Z9. 1.19. 0.41. 3

• 5.7. Z.3. -1.a. -o.3. -1.1

• o.z. 1.3. 5.5. a.z *

• 0.38-. 0.118.: 1.3Z 1.35. 1.30. 1.ZZ 1.30 1.35. l.3Z. o.aa. 0.38 .

• 0.41

• 0.89 . 1.31

• 1.34

• 1.31 .. 1.Z3

• 1.31 . 1.37

• 1.35

• 0.90

• 0.39 ** 4*

• 6.5. 1.a. ~o.9. -1.1

• o.4. 1.z. o.a. 1.4. z.z. z.a. z.5.

• 0.3Z. 1.13. J.3Z. 1.Z6 l.Z3. 1.18 1.16 1.18. l.Z3 1.Z6 l.3Z. 1.13 0.3Z

• 0.32. 1.13. 1.31. ).ZS. 1.zz. 1.ZO. 1.18. 1.19. 1.2s*. 1.27. 1.31

• 1.13. 0.3Z. 5

• -1.z. 0~1. -0.11. -o.3. ~a.a. i;1. 1.1. 1.4. 1.3. 1.1. -1.2. -o.3. 1.1 *

• 0.65. 1.Z7. 1.35 1.Z3 1.03 1.07. 1.06 1.07. 1.03. l.Z3*. 1.35. l.Z7. 0.64 *

• 0.6;4

• 1.26

• 1.34

• 1.Zl

• 1.03

• 1.10

• 1.09

• 1.08

• 1.04 ** 1.Z3

• 1.33

• 1.Z4

• 0.63

• 6

• -1.2 ~ -1.2. ~o.a. -1.0. o.4. 2.1. 1.9. _1.3. o.9. -0.2. -1.5. -2.2. -1.9 *

• o.z9. 1.09. 1.28. 1.30 1.18* 1.01. 1.03. 1,1z 1.04. 1.01. 1.1a: 1.30. 1.za. 1.09. o.Z9 .

• 0.28. 1,07. 1.Z6. 1.28. 1.16. 1.08. 1.07 ~ 1.14. 1.05. 1.08. 1.17. l.Z6. 1.Z3. 1.04. 0.28. 7

• 0.36

• 0.85

. -4.1 * *Z.3. -1.2. -1.Z. -1.Z. 1.8. 3.5. 2.3. 1~2. 0.7. -1.1. -3.3. -3.11. -4.5. -3.9

• 1.27 *. 1.21,. _1.15

• L06

• 1.11 . 1.16

• 1.13 . 1.07 . 1.16

• 1.22

• 1.211_. 0.115

• 0.36 *

. 0.35. 0.82. 1.26. 1.21. 1.16. 1.08. 1.15. 1.18. 1.14. 1.07. 1.15. 1.17. 1.23. O.IIZ. 0.35. 8

• ~4.3. -3.3. -1.2. -o.z. D.8. Z.2. 3.8. 2.1. 0.8. 0.3. -1.Z. -3.7. -3.9. -2.9. -2.6 *

, 0.28. 1.09. 1.27. l.Z9. 1.17. 1.06. 1.03. 1.12. 1.04. 1.07. 1.18. 1.30. 1.211. 1.10. 0.29 .

• 0.27. 1.04. 1.22. 1.ZB. 1.111. 1.07. 1.03. 1.12. 1.05. 1.08. 1.18. 1.25. 1.24. 1.07. 0.28. 9

. -4.1 . -4.0. *4.2. -1.2. 0.7. 0.4. -0.2. 0.6. 1.0. 0.5. 0.1. -4.1. -2.B. -Z.1 * -1.4.

0.64 1.27. 1.35. 1.ZZ 1.02. 1.06. 1.06. 1.07. 1.03. l.Z3. 1.35. 1.28. 0.65 .

• 0.61 . 1.21. 1.33. 1.Z3. 1.03. 1.06. 1.07. 1.08. 1.03. 1.23. 1.37. 1.Z6. 0.64. 10

. -4.2. -4.3. -1.5. 0.7. 0.4. 0.0. 0.9. 0.6. -0;1. 0.0. 0.9. -1.6. -1.5.

0.32 1.13 1.32 1.25 1.23. 1.17 1.16 1.111. 1.23 1.26. 1.33. 1.14. 0.32

• 0.31

• 1.11

• 1.31. 1.Z6. 1.23. 1.111. 1.17. 1.18. 1.22. 1.27. 1.36. 1.16. 0.32. 11

• -1.9. -1.9. -0.8. 0.7. 0.3. 0.6. 1.6. 0.3. -1.1. 0.11. 2.4. 2.2. O.J.

0.38 0.117 1.3Z 1.35. 1.30 1.Zl 1.30 1.35 l.3Z 0.118. D.38 *

• 0.38 . 0.811

• 1.33

• 1.35

• 1.30

• 1.23

• 1.30 . 1.35

• 1.34

• 0.90

• 0.40

• 12

. 0.6. 0.6. 0.6*. 0.3. 0.2. 1.0. 0.3. -0.5. 1.0. 2.6. 4.1 *.

0.38 1.13 1.Z7 1.Z8 1.28 1.28 1.27 1.13 0.311 *

• 0.39

• l.111

• 1.30

• 1.211

• 1.27

• 1.25 . 1.25

• 1.16

• 0.39

• 13

• 2.7. 4.8. Z.4. 0.0. *1.1. -2.2. -2.Z. Z.5. 3.2.

D.3Z D.65. 1.10. 0.115. 1.10. 0.65. 0.32 *

• 0.33*. o.67. 1.1z. a.as. 1.01. o.63. 0.31. 14

• 4.a. 3.11. z.2. -o.a. -z.3. -2.2. -2.1.

STANDARD

• O.Z9 D.37 O.Z9 *

• AVERAGE

• DEVIATION *

• 0.30. 0.37. 0.29; .PCT DIFFERENCE

• 15

=) .5611

• 2.1. 0.3. -2.4. = 1.8 SUHNARY NAP NO: *S2-12-02 DATE~ S/ 8/93 POWER: S7.2Y.

CONTROL ROD POSITIONS: F-OlZ) = 2.11S OPTR:

D BANK AT 16S STEPS F-DH(N) = l.lt99 NW 1.0010 NE 1.0026 f(Z) = 1.333 SW 0.9972 SE 0.9991 BURNUP = 28 NWD/NTU A.O. = -3.508%

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physic~ Tests Report Page 38 of 58

• Figure 6.3 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS ASSEHBLYWISE POWER DISTRIBUTION 90% POWER R p J H F E D II A N

" L IC C C PREDICTED

• 0.31 0.40 0.32 PREDICTED

• NEASURED *

• 0.31. 0.39. 0.31. IEASURED l

• PCT DIFFERENCE. * -z.o * -z.z .* -2.0 * .PCT DIFFERENCE.

0.32 0.65 l.lZ 0.91 1.12 0.65 0.3Z

• • 0.34 . 0.65 * .I.ID

• 0.90 . 1.10

• 0.66

• 0.35

• z

• 6.0. -1.Z. -1.5. -1.11. -1.5. l.O. 11.4 *

• 0.38. 1.11. l.Z4. l.Z7. l.ZII. l.Z7. l.Z4. 1.11. 0.38 *

• 0.40

• 1.13

• l.Z3 * *l.Z7

• l.Z7

• l.Z7

• l.Z6

• 1.17

• 0.41 . 3

• 5.Z. Z.4. -1.Z. 1.1. -0.7. 0.3. 1.0. 5.5. 11.4 *

. 0.38. 0.86. l.Z8 l.3Z. l.ZII. l.Zl l.Z8 1.32 1.28 0.86 0.38

• o.41 . 0.118

• 1*.28

• 1.31 . 1.29 . 1.22 . 1.29 . 1.33

• 1.31 . 0.119

• ci.39

• 4

. 5.9. 1.8. -0.4. -0.7. 0.7. 1.5. 0.8. 1.0. 2.1. 3.2. 2.7 *

~

0.32. 1.11. 1.28. l.Z4 1.22 1.111 1.16 1.18 1.22 l.Z4 1.28 1.11. 0.32.

. 0.32. 1.11

• 1.28. 1.24. 1.22. 1.20. 1.17. 1.19. 1.24. 1.25. 1.28. 1.11. 0.33

• 5

• -1.5. -0.0. -0.5. -0.2. -0.4. 1.5. 1.5. 1.4. 1.1

• 0.9. -0.4. -0.l. 0.3.

o.65 1.24. 1.32. 1.22 1.08 1.09. 1:011 1.09 1.09 1.22 1.32 1.24 o.65

• o.64 .* 1.z3

• 1.31

• 1.22

• 1.09

• 1.11 .* 1.09

• 1.10

• 1.10

• 1.22 *. 1.31

• 1.22

• o.64 ** 6

• -1.5. *1.5. -0.6. -0.4. 0.7. Z.l. 1.3. 1.1. 1.3. 0.1. *l.O. -1.11. 0 1.9 *

• 0.31 . 1.12

• 1.27

• 1.211 . 1.111

• 1.09

• 1.06

• 1.14

• J°.07

• 1.09

• 1.18

• 1.28 . 1.27

• 1.11

• 0.31 *

• 0.29 . 1.09

• 1.25 . 1.26

• 1.17 . 1.11

• 1.09

• 1.16 ** 1.08

• 1.10 . 1.17

• 1.24

• 1.23

• 1.07

• 0.30

• 7

• -4.3. -2.6_ .. -1.5. -1.l * -0.4. 1.8. 3.1. 1.8, 0.9. 0.11. -0.8. -Z.9. -3.3. -3.11. *3.2 .

0.39

• 0.91

• 1.27

• 1.20

• 1.15 . 1.011

• 1.13 . 1.18 . 1.-15 . 1.08

• 1.16

• 1.21

• 1.211

• 0.91

• 0.40 *

• 0.38 * -0.117 . 1.25

• 1.20

• 1.16

• 1.10

• 1.16 . 1.20 . 1.16

• 1.09

• 1.14

• 1.17

• 1.23

• 0.811

• 0.38 *

• 8

• -4.5. ~3.4. -1.5. -0.4. 0.11. z.o. 3.3. 1.6. *o.5. 0.2. -1.l. *3.4. -3.6. *2.7. -2.7.

0.30 1.11 1.26. 1.27. 1.17. 1;09. 1.05. 1.14. 1.06. 1.09. 1.18. 1.28. l.Z7. 1.12. 0.31 *

• 0.29. 1.07. 1.22. 1.26: 1.111. 1.09. 1.06. 1.14. 1.07. 1.10. 1.18. 1.23. 1.24. 1.09. 0.30. 9

• -4.3. *3.9. -3.6. -0.9. 0.8. 0.5. 0.1. 0.4. 0.4. 0.2. o.o. -4.0. -2.11. -Z.4. -2.3.

o.65 1.24 1.32

• 1.22

• 1.011 . 1.09

• 1.08

• 1.09 . 1.09

• 1*.22

• 1.32

• 1.24

• o.65

. 0.63. 1.19. 1.30. 1.22. 1.08. l.D9. 1.09. 1.10. 1.09. 1.23. 1.34. 1.22 .*0.64. 10

• -3.6. -3.6. -1.2*. 0.6. 0.4. 0.4. 1.1. 0.8. 0.2. 0.5. 1.1 * -1.11. *l.9 *

• 0.32. 1.10. 1.28. l.Z4. 1.22. 1.111. 1.15. 1.18. 1.22. 1.24. 1.211. 1.11

• 0.32.

• 0.3Z . 1.08 . 1.27 . 1.24 .* 1.22 . 1.19 . 1.18 . 1.19 . 1.22

• 1.25 . 1.31 . 1.12

• 0.3Z

• 11

. -1.9. -1.9. -0.9. 0.4. 0.3. 0.9. 2.0. 1.0. -0.2. 1.0. 2.0. 1.5. 0.2.

0.38 0.86 1.28 1.32 l.ZII 1.20 l.ZII 1.32 1.28 0.117. 0.38

• o.38 . o.86 . 1.29 . 1.32 . l.Z8 . 1.22 . 1.21 . 1.31 . 1.z9

• 0.1111 _. o.4o

• IZ

. -0.I . O.l . 0.4. 0.3. 0.5. 1.3. -0.1 . -o:8. 0.4. Z.l

• 3.1.

0.38 1.10 l.Z4 l.Z7 l.Z8 l.Z7 1.24 1.11 0.38

• 0.39 . 1.1'4

• l.Z6 . 1.27

• l.Z7 . l.Z4

• I.Zl

• 1.10

• 0.39

• 13

. 1.5. 3.0. 1.7. 0.3. -0.7. -2.0 *. -Z.3. -0.7. 2.5.

0.3Z 0.65 l.lZ 0.91'. l.lZ 0.65 0.3Z

• 0.33. 0.67. 1.13. 0.91

• 1.10. 0.64. 0.32. 14

• 3.0. z.z. *o~7. -0.9. -1.7. -2.0. -Z.4.

STANDARD 0.31 0.40 0.31 *. AVERAGE

• DEVIATION *

• 0.32. 0.40. 0.31.

• PCT DIFFERENCE

• 15

=l.4111

• 0.6. -0.3. -1.7. z*. 1.7 SutlttARV NAP NO: S2-12-03 DATE: . 5/ 9/93 POWER: 89.97.

CONTROL ROD POSITIONS: F-Q(ZJ = 1.942 QPTR:

D BANK AT 203 STEPS F-DH(N) = 1.444 NW 1.0016 NE 1.0031 F(ZJ = 1.251 SW 0.9973 SE 0.9979 BURNUP = 57 NWD/NTU A.O.= +2.3737.

NE-943 S2C12 *startup Physics Tests Report Page . 39 of 58

• Figure 6.4 SURRY UNIT 2 - CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TESTS ASSEMBLYWISE POWER DISTRIBUTION 100% POWER R p N N l IC J .H G. F **** E D C B A PREDICTED *

• 0.3Z. D.40 0.3Z. PREDICTED *

• NEASURED

• 0.31. 1.40. 0.3Z. IEASURED l

• PCT DIFFERENCE. -. ~1.z. -i.z. o.4. .PCT DIFFERENCE

• 0.3Z 0.65 1.11. 0.9Z 1.11 D.65. 0.3Z

• 0.34. 0.64. 1.09. 1.90. 1.11. D.67. 0.34. z

• 6.6. ~l.5. -1.4. -1.4. 0.4. Z.7. 5.5 *

• 0.38. 1.09. l.Z4. l.Z5. 1.za. I.ZS. l.Z3 .*1.09. 0.38 *

• 0.40. 1.lZ. 1.21. l.ZS. 1.26. 1.26. 1.26. 1.15. 0.4Z. 3

• s.1. 2.z. -2.1. -o.4. -1.1. o.6. 1.9. s.4. 9.9 .

~

• o.38. o.86. 1.28. 1.31

• 1.za. 1.20 1.z8. 1.31. 1.za o.86. o.38 *

• 0.41

• 0.87

• 1.26 .

• 1.30

• l.Z9

• l.Zl . 1.28

• l.3Z

• 1.31

• 0.89 . 0.40 .

. 6.6. 1.1. -1.1 * -o.s. o.a. 1.0. o.s. 1.0. 2.4. 3.7. 4.o *

• 0.3Z. 1.09. 1.28. 1.23. l.Z4. 1.18 1.17 1.18. 1.24 1.23 l.Z8. 1.09 0.3Z

• 0.3Z

• 1.09

• 1.26

• l.Z3 ** l.Z3

• 1.20

• 1.18

• 1.zo

• 1.25

• l.Z5

• 1.Z7

• 1.10

• 0.33 .* 5

• ~z.z. -0.1: -1.0 ** -o.5. -o.z. 1.6. 1.4. *1.4. 1.4. 1.0. -o.6. 1.0. z.9 *

~

. 0.65. 1.24. 1.31 . 1.23. 1.11 . 1.11

• 1.09 I.II. 1.11. 1.23. 1.31 . 1.23. 0.65 .

• 0.63. l.Zl. 1.29. 1.z2. l.lZ. 1.14. 1.11. 1.13. 1.13. l.Z4. 1.30. l.ZZ. 0.64. 6

• -z.z. -2.Z. -1.3. -1.3. 0.7. 2.Z. 1.3. 1.5. 1.9. 0.4. -0.9. -1.l . -0.6 *

~

• 0.31

• 1.10 . 1.25

• 1.28

• 1.18

• 1.11

• 1.07 . 1.-15

• l.08

• 1.12

• 1.18 . 1.28

• 1.25

• 1.10 . 0.31 *

• o.3o . 1.oa . 1.23

• 1.25

• L16

• 1.1z

• 1.11 .: 1.1a . 1.09

• 1.u

• 1.18

• 1.z4

• 1.21

• 1.06

• 0.30

• 1

• -2.5. -2.3. -2.2. -1.a*. -1.s. o.a. 3.s. 2.1 . 1.4. 1.3. -o.3. -2.s. -3.o. -3.7. -z.a *

• 0.40. 0.91

• 1.27. 1.20. 1.16. 1.09. 1,14. 1.19. 1.17. 1.09. 1.17. 1.20. 1.27 *. 0.91. 0.40 .

• o.39. o.a9. 1.24. 1.18. 1.15. 1.09. 1.19. 1.21. 1.11. 1.10. 1.16. 1.16. 1.23. o.9o. o.39. a

. -:2.5 * -2.4 * -2.z * -1.2 * *l.3

• o.4

• 3.* 7

• 2.1

• o.6

• o.3 * -o.9 * -3.2 . -3.4 * -1.6 . -1.6 .

0.30 1.10 1.25 1.27. 1.18 1.11

• 1.07. 1.15 1.08. 1.12. 1.18 1.28. 1.26. 1.10 0.31 *

• 0.30 . l.D6 . 1.19

• 1.25

• 1.18

• 1.10

• 1.07

• 1.16 ; 1.09

• 1.11

• 1.18

• 1.26 . J.Z4

• 1.09 .. 0.31

• 9

. -2.5. -3.5. --4.5. -1.6. -0.1. -o.3. 0.1. 0.1. 0.1. -o.8. -o.4. -1.3. -1.4. -1.z. -o.a *

• 0.64. l.Z3. 1.30. 1.23. 1.11

• 1.11. 1.09. 1.11. 1.11. l.Z3. 1.31

• l.Z4. 0.65 .

. 0.61 . 1.18. l.Z8. l.Z3. 1.11

• 1.11. 1.10. l.lZ. 1.11. 1.24. l.3Z. l.Z4. 0.65. 10

~ *4.5. -4.5. -1.a,. o.z. 0.1

• o.z. o.a. 0.1. -o.3. 0.1. o.s. 0.1. -0.1 .

0.3Z 1.09 1.27 l.Z3 l.Z3 1.18 1.17 1.18. 1.24. 1.23 1.28. 1.09. 0.3Z .

• 0.3Z. 1.07. 1.Z6. l.Z3. l;Z3. 1.18. 1.18. 1.18. 1.23. 1.25. 1.31

• l.lZ. 0.33. 11

• *1.7. *l.7. *0.9. o.z. -o.z; O.l

• 1.0. 0.0. -a.a. l.Z. z.z. Z.5. z.z.

0.38 0.86 l.Z8 1.31 . l.Z8 1.20 1.28

• 1.31

• 1.28 0.86

• 0.38 .

• 0.39 ** 0.86 . l.Z8

• 1.30

• l.Z7

• 1.20

• 1.27 . 1.30

• 1.29

• 0.89 . 0.40 . lZ 1.0. 0.1. 0.2. -o.6. -o.a. 0.1. -0.1. -o.9. o.6. 3.o. 5.1 *

• 0.38. 1.09. 1.23. l.Z6. 1.28. 1.25. 1.23. 1.09. 0.38 .

• 0.39. 1.14. 1.26. 1.24. 1.25. 1.22. 1.21. 1.09. 0.40. 13

. z.9. 4.7. 1.a. -1.1. -1.a. -z.3. -2.z. -o.3. 3.a.

0.32 0.65. 1.11 0.92 1.11. 0.65. 0.32

• o.34. 0:61. 1.1z. 1.91. 1.oa. o.63. o.3Z. 14

• 4.7 *. 3.5. 1.6. -0.9. -z.s. -2.3. *2.1

• STANDARD 0.32 D.40 D.3Z. AVERAGE

• DEVIATION *

• 0.3Z. 0.40. 0.31 . .PCT DIFFERENCE

• 15

=l.529

• 1.6. *D.D. *2.5. = 1.7 SUNNARY*

"AP NO: S2-12-04 DATE: . .5/29/93 POWER: 99.97.

CONTROL ROD POSITIONS: F-Q(ZJ = 1.890 QPTR:

D BANK AT 224 STEPS F-DH(NJ = 1.424 NW 0.9989 NE 1.0069 F<ZJ = 1.228 SW 0.9947 SE 0.9994 BURNUP = 646 "WD/NTU A.O. = +0.2717.

NE-94~ S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 40 of 58

• SECTION 7 REFERENCES

1. D. A. Trace, "Surry Unit 2, Cycle 12 Design Report",

Technical Report NE-932, Revision 0, Virginia Power, April, 1993.

2. T. K. Ross, W. C. Beck, "Control Rod Reactivity Worth Determination By The Rod Swap Technique," VEP-FRD-36A, December, 1980.

3. Letter from W.. L. Stewart (Virginia Power) to.the U.S.N.R.C, "Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2, North.Ann~ Power Station Units 1 and 2: Modification of Startup Physics Test Program - Inspector Followup Item 280, 281/88-29-01., Serial No.89-541, December 8, 1989.

4. "Evaluation of Measured S2C12 HZP ARO Critical Boron Concentration",

memorandum from C.B. LaRoe and R.T. Robins to J.W. Henderson,

.dated May*5, 1993.

5. W. Leggett and L. Eisenhart, "The INCORE Code," WCAP-7149, December, 1967.

6. "Safety Evaluation Supporting Operation of Surry 2 Cycle 12 with 100 P&I RCS Pressure Reduction Surry Power Station Unit 2'",

memorandum from K.L. Basehore to J.A. Price, dated May 3, 1993.

1. "Surry Unit 2 - Issuance of'. A.*ndment Re: Operating at Reduced Reactor Coolant System Nominal Operating Pressure (TAC No. M86358)",

letter from G.C. Lainas (NRC) to W.L. Stewart (VP), dated May *14, 1993.

8. Surry Unit 1 and 2 Technical Specifications, Sections 3.1.E.1,.

3.12.B.1, 3.12.C.1, and 4.10.A.

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 41 of 58

APPENDIX STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEETS NE-94*3 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 42 of 58

• ....... *.* ~

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

Zero Power Testing Range Determination

-Reference Proc No /Section: 2-NPT-RX-008 Sequence Step No:

II Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (OF): 547 Test Power Level (1 F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (specify):

(Design) CB: 225 CC:

• CD:

• Below Nuclear Heating III Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature ( °F): S"""° .o Test Power Level (1 F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 *cA: 225 Other (Specify) : 'P"'~!:> s~< : '2.1 (Actual) CB: 225 CC: ;z.~I CD: qg Below Nuclear Heating Date/Time Test Performed:

'5/'+-/q"3 22\°I Reactivity Computer IV Initial Flux _.

Background Reading 5'.'5 ~ 10 amps

_ Flux Reading At

.... "'~ ..:.pt~f-Nuclear -

~.S" ,r.. 10-'7 Heating amps Test Results Zero Power Testing Range l.O ><: 10

-i to ID x.. ID

_. amps Reference Not Appli'.cable V FSAR/Tech Spec Not Applicable Acceptance Criteria Reference Not _Applicable Design Tolerance is met**  : ~YES _NO VI Acceptance Criteria is met**  : iYES ,_'_NO Comments

• At The Just Critical Position

• • Design Tolerance and Acceptance Criteria are met if ZPTR is below Point of Nuclear Heating and above background.

Prepared By:~~~~ Reviewed By: t>.vl. l ~

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 43 _ of 58

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

Reactivity Computer Checkout Reference Proc No /Section: 2-NPT-RX-008 Sequence Step No:

II . Bank Positions (Steps) - RCS Temperature (°F): 547 Test Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (specify):

(Design) CB: 225 CC:

• CD:

• Below Nuclear Heating III Bank Positions (~fteps) RCS Temperature ( °F): <;; 4 7 Test Power Level (l F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SOB: 225 CA: 225 Other (Specify): prf'~S "'.-~

(Actual) CB: 225 CC: 2. 'l. '2. CD : q "-l Below Nuclear Heating Date/Time Test Performed:

5/1-+/q'"; 2 ~ t\

Measured Parameter Pc = Heas. Reactivity using p-compute r IV (Description) Pt = Predicted Reactivity Pc = 5 '3. O - 5 i w.,_

5 3 . '<SC,

- S" 2.  :~5( 1 ,;' /6f IL/qJ

- Measured Value Pt =

M,t- _- __.....

• . a Test Results ID= - I. Co5 - 3.**n*

Design Value ID= {(pc-Pt)/pt} x 100:. :S *4.0:

Reference W~AP 7905, Rev. 1, Table 3.6 V FSAR/Tech Spec Not Applicable Acceptance Criteria Reference Not Applicable Design Tolerance is met Acceptance Criteria is aet

~YES

.,L.YES _NO

- NO VI

• At The Just Critical Position Comments The allowable range will be set based on the above results, as well as the results from the bench test.

Allowable Range= - so

+

Prepared By: l). f. /4iJ.&cw Reviewed By:'1-"~,,~~~ ..v.,,!' J NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 44 of 58

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

Critical Boron Concentration - ARO Reference Pree No /Section: 2-NPT-RX-008 Seq1,1ence Step No:

II Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (OF): 547 Test Power Level (1 F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (specify):

(Design) CB: 225 CC: 225 CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating III Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (OF): 5'17, '-I ,

Test Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (Specify) : _P R~SS/4 R.<: ZI! S"' PS I Er '

(Actual) CB: 225 CC: 225 CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating Date/Time Test Performed:

.3:ts ,

. 5/5'/'f3 Heas Parameter IV (Description)

H

_(CB) ARO* .. _Critical Boron Cone - ARO Measured Value M ,

Test Results (Design Cond) . (CB) ARO = I 9 t. I ff"'

.... M'e:lg;-*;:*lue -

- -'P *

(Design Cond) CB= 1910 +/- 50 ppm Reference Technie;al Report NE-932, Rev. 0 D

V FSAR/Tech Spec aCB x CB :s; 1000 pcm Acceptance

.Criteria Reference Technical Specification 4.10.A Design Tolerance is met  : _YES YNO ,

Acceptance Criteria is met  : V'fES _NO VI Comments aCB = -7.23 pcm/ppm D H CB= I (CB) ARO - CB I ; CB is design value.

Prepared By: Reviewed By: ~ ~t..._

NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 45 of 58

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET

- I Test

Description:

Isothermal Temperature Coefficient - ARO Reference Pree No /Section: 2-NPT-RX-008 Sequence Step No:

II Bank Posit ions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F): 547 Test Power* Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (specify):

(Design) CB: 225 CC: 225 CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating

- III' Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F): SYr."'

Test Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (Specify): .ll 3S P':,I ~

(Ac"tual) CB: 225 CC: 225 CD: Below Nuclear Heating Da-ce/Time Tes"t Performed:

"°'

5/5 {"1'5 O'i ~ 'l '-t

-Meas Parameter :ISO IV (Description) (a T )ARO Isothermal Temp Coeff - ARO ISO Test Results Measured Value (a T )ARO = "."'0.,-, pcm/°F (CB =i9S~ppm)

Design Value ISO :t~.o

.... ~~ual~ond) (a T *)ARO = -1. l~,. pcm/°F (CB = ICf~ppm)

. ISO Design Value (a T )ARO = -1. 63 +/- 3. 0 pcm/°F (Design Cond)

., (CB = 1910 ppm)

Reference Technical Report NE-932, Rev. 0 V ISO Dop Accep"tance FSAR/Tech Spec a T ~ 0.81*pcm/°F a T = -1. 69 pcm/°F Criteria Reference TS 3.1.E, Technical Report NE-932, Rev. 0 Design Tolerance is 111et  : J YES NO VI Acceptance Criteria is met  : JYES =NO Comments

• Uncertainty on aTHOD = 0.5*pcm/°F (

Reference:

memorandum from C. T. Snow to E. J. Lozito dated June 27, 1980).

Prepared By:L~~ Reviewed By:

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 46 of 58

• -* ~--~...

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

Cntl Bank B Worth Meas.,Rod Swap Ref. Bank Reference Proc No /Section: 2-NPT-RX-008 Seq_uence Step No:

II Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F): 547 Test Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (specify):

(Design) CB:Moving CC: 225 CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating III Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F):

Test Power Level (%. F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (Specify):

(Actual) CB:Moving CC: 225 CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating Date/Time Test Performed:~

~ /5'./'13 J2 ~ Jrnt,.zo *lo REF Measured Parameter I B ; Integral Worth of Cntl Bank B, (Description) All Other Rods Out IV REF Test Results Measured Value I B = I ~'3°!

-- f ....-- -

Design Value REF (Design Conditions) I B = 1504 +/- 150 pcm Reference Technical Report NE-932, Rev. 0 If Design Tolerance is exceeded, SNSOC shall evaluate impact of test result V FSAR/Tech Spec on safety analysis. SNSOC may specify Acceptance that additional testing be performed.

Criteria Reference VEP-FRD-36A Design Tolerance is met  : 9Es NO VI Acceptance Criteria is met  : _YES _,'_NO Comments

-- / /"'I .11 Prepared By: V1/dld/ Reviewed B y : 7 ~ ./. tiA< ..e~

' f ,/,. ~ .ifo/1"s NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 47 of 58

'\,, ...

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

Critical Boron Concentration . - B Bank In

• Reference Pree No /Section: 2-NPT-RX-008 Sequence Step No:

II Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F): 547 Test Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (specify):

(Design) CB: 0 CC:. 225 CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating III Bank Posit.ions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F):

Test Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA:* 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (Specify):

(Actual) CB: 0 CC: 225 CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating Date/Time Test Performed:

.'56-1'13 l'>~~D Meas Parameter *-*

H IV (Description) (CB)B; Critical Boron Cone - B Bank .;In H

Test Measured Value (Design Cond)

(CB)B = /7,3 Results

.... ~- .* __ ...... .

Prev Design Value CB = 1704 + ACB +/- (10 + 150.4/laCBl)ppm (Design Cond)

CB = /7,, ppm  ;! 30.~

Reference Techni,:al Report NE-932, Rev. 0 V FSAR/Tech Spec Not Applicable Acceptance Criteria Reference Not Applicable

/

_NO

~~ ._NO Design Tolerance is met  :

Acceptance Criteria is met* :

VI Comments aCB = -7.30 pcm/ppm ,,

ACB Prev H

= (CB)ARO - 1910 - let~/ - 1'110 ,i:;  ?/

.,., .II

__ /]

Prepared By: '//dll /[~V I I Reviewed B y : / ~ / .

NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 48 of 58

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AMO EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

HZP Boron Worth Coefficent Measurement Reference Proc No /Section: 2-NPT-RX-008 Sequ~nce Step No:

II Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F): 547 Test Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (specify):

(Design) CB:Hoving CC: 225 CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating III Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F):

Test Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (Specify):

(Actual) CB:Hoving CC: 225. CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating Date/Time Test Performed:

5"/:;-/f'~ I f)lf Measured Parameter IV (Description) aCB, :Boron Worth Coefficient Measured Value aCB = -7."IO Test Results.,._ ~ . -

Design Value (Design Conditions) aC 8 = -7.30 +/- 0.73 pcm/ppm Reference Technical Report NE-932, Rev. 0 FSAR/Tech Spec Not Applicable V

Acceptance Criteria Reference Not Applicable Design Tolerance is met.  : /vEs _NO VI Acceptance Criteria is met  : DES ~NO Comments Prepared By: 111(/Uf' Reviewed By: ~ J . ~.e, NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 49 of 58

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

Cntl Bank D Worth Measurement-Rod Swap Reference Proc No /Section: 2-NPT-RX-008 Sequence Step No:

II Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (OF): 547 Test Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (specify):

(Design) CB:Hoving CC: 225 CD:Moving Below Nuclear Heating III Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F):

Test Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (Specify):

(Actual) CB:Hoving CC: 225 CD:Moving Below Nuclear Heating Date/T_ime Test Performed:

t.., ,-: _:,. /J ~ ;*

Meas Parameter RS (Description) Io ;* ~tit Worth of Cntl Bank D-Rod Swap IV RS (Adj. Meas. Crit. Ref Bank

Test Results Measured Value In = 'i3'1 I.'> Position = JI)&/ steps)

-. _Design Value r#.!f11~ ~ ' d ) RS Io RS

=

(Adj. Meas. Crit. Ref Bank

/125.5J /jgPosition = //)'f _steps)

Design Value Io= 923 +/- 138 pcm (Critical Ref Bank (Design Cond) Position= 119 steps)

Reference Technical Report NE-932, Rev. 0, VEP-FRD-36 A If Design Tolerance is exceeded, SNSOC shall evaluate impact of test result on V FSAR/Tech Spec safety analysis. SNSOC may specify that Acceptance additional testing be performed.

Criteria Reference VEP-FRD-36A

/

Design Tolerance is met  : ~ES NO VI Acceptance Criteria is 11et  : ES _NO*

Comments A

J/1' ' .,.

Prepared By: 1/11 ., . , *--** Reviewed NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 50 of 58

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

Cntl Bank C Worth Measurement-Rod Swap Reference Pree No /Section: 2-NPT-RX-008 Sequence Step No:

II Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (OF): 547.

Test Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (specify):

(Design) CB:Moving CC:MovingCD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating III Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (OF):

Test. Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SOB: 225 CA: 225 Other (Specify):

(Actual) CB:Moving CC:MovingCD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating Date/Time Test Performed:

~1~/~1 -** I //{j .

Meas Parameter RS (Description) Ic ; Int.-Worth of Cntl Bank C-Rod Swap IV RS ~{p/ (Adj. Meas. Crit. Ref Bank Test* Measured Value Ic = ":J.=18 !iJi,~osit~on = .,G, steps)

Results 11

' Design v*alue RS 7S~~ I

/.(, ~(Ad J*

• Meas . Cr i. t. Re f Ban k

.... ~~l..CO.d) le =*:;;;.;!Jf't Position = t:I{, steps)

'RS Design Value Ic = 779 +/- 117 pcm (Critical Ref Bank (Design Cond) Position= 102 seeps)

~

Reference Technical Report NE-932, Rev. o, VEP-FRD-36 A If Design Tolerance is exceeded, SNSOC shall evaluate impact of test result on V FSAR/Tech Spec safety analysis. SNSOC may specify that Acceptance additional, testing be performed.

Criteria Reference VEP-FRD-36A Design Tolerance is met  : /_:YES ~NO VI Acceptance Criteria is met  : _LYES _NO Comments

• /

Prepared By: Reviewed NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 51 of 58

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS rEsT RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

Cntl Bank A Worth Measurement-Rod Swap Reference Pree No /Section: 2-NPT-RX-008 Sequence Step No:

II Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (OF).: 547 Test Power Level (I F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA:Moving Other (specify):

(Design) CB:Moving CC: 225 CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating III Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (OF):

Test Power Level (%. F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA:Hoving Other (Specify):

(Actual) CB:Moving CC: 225 CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating Date/1'.ime Test Performed:

',  : ...' .,.,. !2C'7 Meas Parameter (Description) I RS.

A .., lnt Worth of Cntl Bank A-Rod Swap IV RS ~Adj. Meas. Crit. Ref Bank Test Measured Value IA = 317* Position = ti, l steps)

Results Design Value RS (Adj. Meas. Crit. Ref Bank

,* * -~* a1:...ceind)

-,-...:-. - IA =-_-~Hf :! /OD Position = GI steps) i RS Design Value IA= 338 +/- 100 pcm (Critical Ref Bank (Design Cond) Position= 64 steps)

Reference Technical Report NE-932, Rev. 0, VEP-FRD-36 A If Design Tolerance is exceeded, SNSOC shall evaluate impact of test result on V FSAR/Tech Spec safety analysis. SNSOC may specify that Acceptance additional testing be performed.

Criteria Reference .VEP-FRD-36A Design Tolerance is met  : ~Y~S _NO VI Acceptance Criteria is met *. _YES _NO Comments

- ~

Prepared By: Reviewed NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 52 of 58

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

Shutdown Bank B Worth Meas. - Rod Swap Reference Proc No /Section: 2-NPT-RX-008 Sequence Step No:

II Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F): 547.

Test Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB:HovingCA: 225 Other (specify) :

(Design) CB:Hoving CC: 225 CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating III Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F):

Test Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB:HovingCA: 225 Other (Specify) :

(Actual) CB:Moving CC: 225 CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating Date;imr- Test Performed:

s- ', '

I '?3 112'1 Meas Parameter RS (Description) I5B; Int:* Worth of Shutdown Bank B-Rod Swap IV. RS I lJ05", CJ (Adj. Meas. Crit. Ref Bank Test Measured Value IsB =

• Position = 12.2.steps)

Results Design Value [0/'2) (Adj. Heas. Crit. Ref Bank

... _ ,*. - --* a-l--CMl'd)

~ -

RS IsB =_- ~ * +/-1~2 Position =IZ'Z. steps)

RS Design Value IsB = 1011 +/- 152 pcm (Critical Ref Bank (Design Cond) Position= 131 steps)

~

Reference Technical Report NE-932, Rev. 0, VEP-FRD-36 A If Design Tolerance is exceeded, SNSOC shall evaluate impact of test result on V FSAR/Tech Spec safety analysis. SNSOC may specify that

• Acceptance additional testing be performed.

Criteria Reference VEP-FRD-36A

/

Design Tolerance is met  : ~S . NO VI Acceptance Criteria is met  : ES =NO Comments

- .ti I' Prepared By:

1{/,11,.

U;L. Reviewed B y : ~ t?

I' I fI~11~ 5/ cs; 7 NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 53 of 58

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12.

STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

Shutdown Bank A Worth Meas. - Rod Swap Reference Proc No /Section: 2-NPT-RX-008 Sequence Step No:

II Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F): 547 Test Power Level (% F .P.): 0 Conditions SDA:HovingSDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (specify):

(Design) CB:Hoving CC: 225 CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating III Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F):

Test. Power Level (% F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA:MovingSDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (Specify):

(Actual) CB:Moving CC: 225 CD: 225 Below Nuclear Heating Date Tzme Test Performed:

~ ~, q3 I

13,0-,

Meas Parameter RS.

(Description). IsA; Int Worth of Shutdown Bank A-Rod Swap IV RS J{)'/~ (Adj. Meas. Crit. Ref Bank_

• Test Measured Value 1sA = *~ Position =l"3"fsteps)

Results Design Value RS J (Adj. Meas. Crit. Ref Bank

.... ~11.~-l -Coild) 1sA =-_- f 'iL/.v: Iii .Position =11'1 steps)

- RS Design Value 1sA = 1140 +/- 171 pcm (Critical Ref Bank (Design Cond) Position = 151 step s)

Reference Technical Report NE-932, Rev. 0' VEP-FRD-36 A If Design Tolerance is exceeded, SNSOC shall evaluate impact of test result on V FSAR/Tech Spec safety analysis. SNSOC may specify that Acceptance additional testing be performed.

Criteria Reference VEP-FRD-36A

/

Design Tolerance is met  : ~S NO VI Acceptance Criteria is met  : _YES _NO Comments t/f .

Prepared By: .y,1.;..e -* . ~ Reviewed By: 7 ~ $d2- ,,,I .

I l I

~. ,,111 o/~/1° 3 NE-943 S2Cl2 Star~up Physics Tests Report Page 54 of 58

• -...~...

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

Total Rod Worth - Rod Swap Reference Proc No /Section: 2-NPT-RX-008 Sequence Step No:

II *Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (OF): 547 Test Power Level (%. .F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA:Hoving SDB:Hoving CA:Hoving Other (specify):

(Design) CB:Hoving CC:Hoving CD:Hoving Below Nuclear Heating III Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (OF):

Test Power Level (1 F.P.): 0 Conditions SDA:H9ving SDB:Hoving CA:Hoving Other (Specify):

(Actual) CB:Hoving CC:Hoving CD:Moving Below Nuclear Heating Oat /T'me Test Perfo_91ed:

~ ~'13 0.31.?

Meas Paralieter (Description) 1 Total; Int Worth of All Banks - Rod Swap IV Test Results Measured Value 1Total = ?,.-~ l"., . 'I.)

k-.

- _Design Value

'J,.

_._.~ ,:a-1-Gcm'd)

Des.ign Value (Design Cond) 1Totar---=:

ITotal 5710.4

= 5695 +/- 570 pcm i f7/

Reference Techni;:al Report NE-932, Rev. 0, VEP-FRD-36 A If Design Tolerance is exceeded, SNSOC shall evaluate impact of test result on V FSAR/Tech Spec safety analysis. Additional testing Acceptance must be performed.

Criteria Reference VEP-FRD-36A Design Tolerance is met  : ~YES

-- NO VI Acceptance Criteria is met  : ~YES ~NO Comments I/)1 ,A Prepared By: f Li,, Reviewed B y : ~ . ) - ~

. . ~ ...,

,;/~

.'S"/s-/tff3 NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 55 of 58

• - -***...'7 SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12

• STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

H/DFlux Hap-At Power Reference Proc No/ Section: 2-NPT-RX-008,002 Sequence Step No:

II Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F):TREF +/-1 Test Power Level(% F.P.): ~30 Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (specify) :

(Design) CB : 225 cc:

• CD:

• Hust h~ve ~ 38 thimbles**

III Bank Positions (Steps)* RCS Temperature( °F) : ~ 5 Test Power Level(% F.P.): 24.1fc Conditions SDA: 225 SOB: 225 CA: 225 Other ( S p e ~

(Actual) CB : 225 CC : '1'2 CS- CD:

Dat~/Time Test Performed:

'~°' l\4 .

6/tnlC,'? h<3 I

MAX *. REL NUC ENTHAL TOTAL HEAT,HAXIHUH POS IV Heas Parameter ASSY PWR RISE HOT FLUX HOT INCORE I (Description)  % DIFF CHAN FACT CHAN FACT !QUADRANT (K-P)/P F-dH(N) F-Q(T) POWER TILT

-(..7 i. P<>,o'l i.a:>.5"~

Test Results - _, __

-Measured.

. --*-*Value Design Value 1.1.r'L r5a.4 t Ill fs: Pl a l.t L ...;-s'"i ;z.3--iO G ,S'"E> 5c, (Design Conds) t In fer Pl

<*i*---->

C l.t NA NA I s: 1.0211 WCAP-79a5 jWCAP-7905 Reference REV.l NONE NONE REV. l I I I

i V FSAR/Tech Specl NONE 1'1.i.MC 1+.J( I.Pl I r~1z1 s ....

• 1111 I NONE Acceptance Criteria Reference NONE TS 3.12.B TS 3.12.B NONE Design Tolerance is met  : LYES _NO Acceptance Criteria is aet  : 4YES ~NO VI Comments

• As Required

• • Hust have at least 16 thimbles for quarter core maps for mu1.w-point calibration.s.

I\ .

Prepared By:

,y_r;~ Reviewed B . lll1 ~b -~

NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 56 of 58

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

H/D Flux Hap-At Power Reference Proc No/ Section: 2-NPT-RX-008,002 Sequence Step No:

II Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature (°F):TREF +/-1 Test Power Level(% F.P.): 50%$1'~75%

Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (specify):

(Design) CB: 225 cc: 225 CD:

• Kust have~ 38 thimbles**

III Test Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Teaperature(°F):

Power Level (% F.P.): S'1, \

s-, :3*

Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (Specify) :

(Actual) ,CB : 225 cc: 225 CD:\C.~

qo ~\fft~\ c.S ~

. Date/Time Test Performed:

~ /.4:f*/q~ (") G1~t>

KAX. REL NUC ENT8AL TOTAL HEAT,HAXIHUM ' POS IV Keas Parameter ASSY PWR RISE HOT FLUX HOT INCORE (Description)  % DIFF CHAN FACT CHAN FACT !QUADRANT (H-P)/P F-dH(N) F-Q(T) !POWER TILT S.6' fi ~6.~ L-00 '\l\

t. ~., 1.4 a,o.o

• l* n cs-Measured Value Test ..._'; ~- -- __..... 'S,l Q,44 5.

Results Design Value a llll 1v**1 a ** , I .

a UI - *1 c ** ,

(Design Conds) <*1 * ....,. llw,) NA NA I ~ 1.0212 WCAP-7905 iWCAP-7905 Reference REV.l NONE NONE REV. l I

V FSAR/Tech Spec NONE r'aai.JW ... JCl*P)I r~r:nsz.D/P

• 1c1, ! NONE Acceptance Criteria Reference NONE TS 3.12.B TS 3.12.BI I NONE Design Tolerance is met  : _NO Acceptance Criteria is met  : ~YES s _NO l

VI Comments

• As Required

• • Hust have at least 16 thimbles for quarter core maps for multi-point calibrations.

Prepared BC J

~ ~ u ~ ~ d\ ~ D. Reviewed By:  ; ,~j~J . ,

I NE-943 S2C12 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 57 of 58

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2 CYCLE 12 STARTUP PHYSICS TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION SHEET I Test

Description:

H/D Flux Hap-At Power Reference Pree No/ Section: 2-NPT-RX-008,002 Sequence Step No:

II Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Temperature ( 1 F):TREF +/-1 Test Power Level(% F.P.): 95%.SPS 100%

Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (specify):

(Design) CB: 225 cc :* 225 CD:

• _Must have ~ 38 thimbles**

III Bank Positions (Steps) RCS Te*perature( 1 F): s,&.\.~

Test Power Level~(% F. P.) : 'l'i .C\\.t Conditions SDA: 225 SDB: 225 CA: 225 Other (Specify): Cu:S ~

(Actual) CB: 225 cc: 225 CD: Z.l3S" p~'

Date/JtmekTest Performed:

S2'i *~ (11,.,54 ~,,.,) ........

MAX. REL NUC ENTHAL TOTAL HEAT MAXIMUM POS IV Meas Paraaeter ASSY PWR

• RISE HOT FLUX HOT INCORE (Description)  % DIFF CHAN FACT CHAN FACT QUADRANT

-(H~P)/P F-dH(N) F-Q(T) POWER TILT Measured Value Test .... t'1i !ll!lf- --* - -* ....

Results *

~q10 r~.,

ls,"\ le.* f'?"° :,

a 111 - *s a,.,

I. ~'2.~ \. 'oi () ,.oce,o Design Value am - , 1 c ,.,

(Design.Conds) IPJ *--,.In.I NA NA S 1.0212 WCAP- 79.,05 IWCAP-7905 Reference REV.1 NONE NONE REV.l r1-.JiO*.J(l*P>I r~msz.n/P

• au I V FSAR/Tech Spec NONE - NONE Acceptance Criteria Reference NONE .TS 3 .12.B TS 3.12.B NONE

.. /

Design Tolerance is met  : ~/v/s' No*

Acceptance Criteria is met  : =:iZYES _NO

\

VI Comments

• As Required

• • Hust have at least 16 thimbles for quarte.r core aaps for multi;point calibrations.

Prepared By.: ri*G

~~'Id I u7£Ih. j) -

- V Reviewed By:

~ ?J I

NE-943 S2Cl2 Startup Physics Tests Report Page 58 of 58