Text

Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leak Rate Test,Type a, B & C Periodic Test
	ML18141A057
Person / Time
Site:	Surry
Issue date:	04/30/1983
From:	; STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML18141A056	List: ML18141A055; ML18141A057;
References
	NUDOCS 8307280425
	Download: ML18141A057 (43)
	v • d • e

.. I *.

REACTOR CONTAINMENT BUILDING INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST TYPE A, B, AND C PERIODIC TEST VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY Surry Nuclear Power Station Unit No. 1 April 1983 PREPARED BY STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION BOSTON, MASS

-~~8307280.42~f 830726,- ----~"~

PDR ADOCK 05000280

.. ~-,*~

.p PDR

Section 1

2 3

4 Title REFERENCES TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST of ATTACHMENTS PURPOSE

SUMMARY

iv V

1-1 2-1 2.1 Type A Test.

2-1 2.2 Local Leak Rate Tests (Types Band C) 2-3 TYPE A TEST 3.1 3.2 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4 3.3 3.3.l 3.3.2 3.3.3 Edited Log of Events General Test Description Prerequisites.....

Equipment and Instrumentation Data Acquisition System Data Resolutipn System Test Results Analysis of Test Results 59.7 psia CILRT Results.

Verification Test Results LOCAL LEAK RATE TESTS (TYPES BAND C) iii 3.1-1 3.1-1 3.2-1 3.2-1 3.2-2 3.2-3 3,2-4 3.3-1 3.3-1 3.3-3 3.3-4 4-1

REFERENCES

1.

10CFRSO Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, October 22, 1980.

2.

1-PT-16.3, Reactor Containment Building Integrated Leak Rate Test, 1983.

3.

ANSI N45.4, American National Standard Leakage-Rate Testing of Containment Structures for Nuclear Reactors, March 16, 1972.

4.

ANSI/ANS-56.8, Containment System Leakage Testing Requirements, February 19, 1981 1

1 This document used only as a guideline and any reference to said document in no way implies compliance.

iv

Attachment 2.lA 2.lB 3.2A 3.2B 3.2C 3.2D 3.3A 3.3B 3.3C 3.3D 3.3E 4A 4B LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Title Graph - Containment Air Mass vs. Time Graph - Containment Temperature vs. Time Site Meteorology Instrumentation CILRT Temperature Detector Locations CILRT Dew Point Temperature Sensor Locations Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test - Input Variables Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test - Absolute Method Test Results Graph - Containment Temperature vs. Time Graph - Containment Air Mass vs. Time Graph - Leak Rate and UCL vs. Time Local Leak Rate Test Data C

Leakage Penalties Added to Type A Leakage V

SECTION 1 PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to present a description and analysis of* the April

1983, Type A Periodic Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test (CILRT), and a summary of the Type B and C tests conducted on the Virginia Electric and Power Company's Surry Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1.

This report is submitted as required by 10CFRSO, Appendix J, Paragraph V.B.

1-1

2.1 Type A Test SECTION 2

SUMMARY

Pressurization for the CILRT was started at 0045 hours5.208333e-4 days 0.0125 hours 7.440476e-5 weeks 1.71225e-5 months on April 20, 1983.

A pressurization rate of approximately 4.5 psi per hour was maintained throughout the pressurization interval.

Initial containment air temperature was approximately 74°F and the initial containment dew point temperature was approximately 65°F.

Containment pressurization was secured at 1131 hours0.0131 days 0.314 hours 0.00187 weeks 4.303455e-4 months on April 20,

1983, with a

peak pressure of 61.385 psia.

Containment air temperature and dew point temperature at the start of the stabilization period were approximately 77°F and 68°F respectively.

The temperature stabilization criterion was satisfied at approximately 1604 hours0.0186 days 0.446 hours 0.00265 weeks 6.10322e-4 months on April 20, 1983.

Over the next five hours, temperature increased by approximately 0.5°F.

At 2104 hours0.0244 days 0.584 hours 0.00348 weeks 8.00572e-4 months on April 20,

1983, the contain~ent temperature became stable and showed little change over the next seven hours.

During the early morning hours on April 21,

1983, river water temperature dropped approximately 2°F.

This temperature drop was passed on to Component Cooling (CC)

System which supplies cooling water to the containment air recirculation fan cooling coils and to the Residual Heat Removal (RHR)

System heat exchangers.

This drop in CC temperature in turn affected containment air temperature causing it to drop approximately 0.3°F over a three hour period.

At 0614 hours0.00711 days 0.171 hours 0.00102 weeks 2.33627e-4 months on April 21, 1983, CC was throttled in an attempt to offset the river water temperature drop.

During the test, Unit 2 was shutdown preparing for startup.

At.the time, the unit was on RHR which caused an increased load on CC.

Due to CC being a. common system between both

units, CC temperature stability was also affected by Unit 2 startup.

The inability to control containment air temperature, with the changes in CC temperature, complicated the determination of the actual leakage rate (See Attachments 2.lA and 2.lB).

Throughout the test, personnel performed searches to identify any leakage which might exist.

During these investigations no significant sources of leakage were found.

It was determined that the temperature effects were artificially inflating the leakage rate.

The reported leakage rate was based on a 28.333 hour0.00385 days 0.0925 hours 5.505952e-4 weeks 1.267065e-4 months test, running from 2104 hours0.0244 days 0.584 hours 0.00348 weeks 8.00572e-4 months on April 20, 1983, to 0124 hours0.00144 days 0.0344 hours 2.050265e-4 weeks 4.7182e-5 months on April 22, 1983.

The calculated leakage rate satisfied the requirements of the procedure.

For further discussion and analysis of the leakage calculations, refer to Section 3.3.

2-1

At 0214 hours0.00248 days 0.0594 hours 3.53836e-4 weeks 8.1427e-5 months on April 22,

1983, t.he mass pump-back verification test started.

At 0400 hours0.00463 days 0.111 hours 6.613757e-4 weeks 1.522e-4 months , the mass pump-back test was completed.

The verification test satisfied the requirements of the procedure.

Depressurization of the containment began at 0600 hours0.00694 days 0.167 hours 9.920635e-4 weeks 2.283e-4 months and was completed at 1708 hours0.0198 days 0.474 hours 0.00282 weeks 6.49894e-4 months on April 22, 1983.

2-2

2.2 Local Leak Rate Tests (Types Band C)

The Local Leak Rate Tests of containment isolation valves and primary containment penetrations were conducted as required by station surveillance procedures since the last Type A Test performed in June of 1981.

In accordance with Appendix J data for the Local Leak Rate Section 4 of this report.

2-3 to 10CFRSO, Paragraph V.B.,

Tests are summarized in

-t

l rl I

l:

0 C

~

U)

H U) (') :D ZC0--1

-I ::;;o z -I r, ::;;o -I :n G) -< :n (')

o H I

nzz3:

-I C 3: r, r, (') r, z t:, r z --1 r, -I r :n I\\)

r,::;;o:n*

D H....,.

A"U:itJ:D 0

o L 3

n r, :n

-I ::;;o U) r, U)

U)

-I -I <

r, :n U)

U) -I *

-I H 0 -I ZH 3:

er, z

H

-I 1700

..p. 1800 l 1900 cs;:i 2000 ci) 2 100 w 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900

..p. 1000 l 1100

....... 1200 cb 1300 w 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 AIR HASS -

LBH U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1

~

U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 I\\)

(SJ (SJ I\\)

U1 (SJ w

w (SJ U1 (SJ (SJ

..p.

(SJ

~

CS)

U1 (SJ (SJ U1 U1 (SJ en (SJ (SJ en U1 (SJ

"'-1 (SJ (SJ

"'-1 U1 CS) *

~

536.40 536.30 536.20

~ 536. 10 u

w 536.00 Q

I 535.90 w 535.80

~ 535.70

J t-535.60 a:

~ 535.50 w

ll. 535.40 J:: w 535.30 t-535.20 535. 10

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~mm~-ru~v-ru~vmw~mm~-ru~vmw~mm~-ru~v-ru

---rururururu~~~~~~~~~----------rururururu~~

4-20-83 TIME -

HOURS 4-21-83 ATTACHMENT 2.18 CONTAINMENT TEMPERATURE VS. TIME SURRY NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT 1 INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST

3.1 SECTION 3 TYPE A TEST Edited Log of Events This log was edited from the Official Log of Events.

April 20, 1983 0011 -

0045 -

0330 -

1131 -

Completed containment inspection Initiated containment pressurization Began gross leakage inspection Isolated containment pressurization source April 21, 1983 0614 -

1309 -

1500 -

1701 -

Component Cooling temperature had decreased by approximately 2°F Unit 1

computer failed causing loss of data -

utilized backup data from Unit 2 computer Leakage noted from vent on penetration 53 Quantified penetration 53 leakage at 15 scfh April 22, 1983 0214 -

0400 -

0600 -

1708 -

2230 -

Initiated mass step change verification test Successfully completed verification test Began containment depressurization Containment depressurization complete Containment inspection for pretest deviations complete 3.1-1

3.2 General Test Description 3.2.1 Prerequisites In accordance with the Surry Unit No. 1 CILRT procedure, 1-PT-16.3 (Reference 2),

the following is a

partial listing of the prerequisites that were completed and documented prior to containment pressurization:

a.

Controlled access plan in effect

b.

General inspection of and exterior surfaces structure was performed the accessible interior of the containment

c.

All required Type B

and C leak rate testing completed

d.

All test instrumentation functionally verified within 6

test.

calibrated months of or the

e.

All required system valve line-ups completed

f.

Component cooling and chilled water systems were operable.

g.

h.

i.

Plant computers were operational and programmed for the CILRT.

The Official Log of Events was established and available prior to commencement of the test.

Site meteorology data recorded for 7 days prior to and during the performance of the CILRT (Attachment 3.2A).

3.2-1

3.2.2 Equipment and Instrumentation Pressurization of the containment was achieved by utilization of eight air compressors.*

Air was piped through two aftercoolers in parallel and a refrigerated air dryer.

Instrumentation and valving were installed to maintain proper monitoring and control during pressurization.

The total capacity of the pres~urization system as installed was rated at 9,900 scfm.

During the test the necessary variables used to determine containment leakage were continually monitored using instrumentation which consisted of multiple resistance temperature detectors (RTDs),

chilled mirror dew point indicators, and two absolute pressure quartz manometers (Attachment 3.2B).

The general locations of the temperature and moisture sensors are shown in Attachments 3.2C and 3.2D.

A mass flowmeter in the service air system was used during the mass pump back verification test.

All test instrumentation readings are input into the plant computer for data acquisition and averaging.

3.2-2

3.2.3 Data Acquisition System The Surry Unit No. 1 CILRT utilized a Westinghouse Prodac P250 to scan, log, average, and a.nalyze data received from the containment instrumentation.

The P250 analog scan package reads all the analog inputs in a preestablished manner, converts these readings into engineering units, and then stores these values for use by the plant operators and by the plant application programs.

For the

CILRT, the P250 Plant Computer monitored the following instrumentation:

~

24 RTDs 5 chilled mirrors 2 quartz manometers Scan Rate (sec) 20 20 2

Instantaneous values of the CILRT instruments were recorded every 15 minutes during the test period, using the P250 digital trend function on the operator's console.

A 10-minute time average of the readings, calculated by the P250 Average and Integrate (A&I) package, was used as input in the plant computer CILRT programs.

The plant computer CILRT program consists of ILRTDATA, which runs every 10 minutes, collects A&I data for all the instrumentation, performs sensor validity checks, and calculates weighted average dew point temperature, vapor

pressure, weighted average containment temperature, and containment air mass.

3.2-3

3.2.4 Data Resolution System After the appropriate data have been acquired and averaged, utilizing the plant computer system, the results are manually input to a remote computer system for leakage rate calculations.

Absolute Method of Mass Point Analysis The Absolute Method of Mass Point Analysis consists of calculating air masses within the containment structure, over the test period, from pressure, temperature, and dew point observations made during the CILRT.

The air masses are computed using the ideal gas law as follows:

M =

144V (P-Pv)

RT where:

M =airmass, lbm P

= total pressure, psia Pv = average vapor pressure, psia R

= 53.35 ft lbf/lbm 0 R (for air)

T

= average containment temperature, 0 R (Eq 1)

V

=.containment free volume, l.*8 x 10 6 ft 3 The leakage rate is then determined by plotting the air mass as a function of time, using a least-squares fit to determine the

slope, A

=

dM/dt.

The leakage rate is exQressed as a Qercentage of air mass lost in 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months or symbolically:

Leakage rate= (A/B) (-2400)

(Eq 2) where A is the slope of the least-squares curve and Bis they-intercept.

The sign convention is such that leakage out of the containment is positive and the units are in percent/day.

The air mass is computed and the result is correlated as a

function of time by means of a least-squares fit of the form:

m =At+ B (Eq 3)

The slope A

and the y-intercept B

are then used in Equation 2 to determine the leakage rate.

A 95 percent confidence interval is calculated using a Student's t distribution.

The sum of the leakage rate and the 95 percent confidence interval is the UCL.

The measured leakage rate may be described as 95 percent accurate to within the value of the UCL.

3.2-4

ATTACHMENT 3.2A SITE METEOROLOGY Barometric Dew Point Dry Bulb Pressure Temperature Temperature Date Time (in. Hg)

(OF)

(OF) 04/14/83 0000 30.37 55.4 0400 30.38 55.4 0800 30.38 46 57.0 1200 30.32 53 68.0 1600 30.25 54 61;3 2000 30.24 51 62.6 04/15/83 0800 30.09 56 64 1200 30.02 54 74 04/16/83 0800 30.07 37 1200 29.89 38 59 2000 29.99 35 57.2 04/17/83 0800 30.00 35 51 1200 29.9 30 60 2000 29.9 31 53.6 04/18/83 0800 29.87 32 48 1200 29.83 33 50 1600 29.81 37 40 2100 29.72 35 38 04/19/83 0800 29.68 28 41 1200 29.64 33 49 1600 29.69 04/20/83 0145 29.69 37.5 44.6 0445 29.69 30.0 42.8 Page 1 of 3

ATTACHMENT 3.2A (Cont'd)

Barometric Dew Point Dry Bulb Pressure Temperature Temperature Date Time (in. Hg)

(OF)

(OF) 4/20/83 0845 29.72 34.0 45.5 1245 29.80 26 51 1645 29.84 33 54 2045 29.86 35 55.4 2104 - Begin CILRT Test Period 2145 29.86 30 51.8 2245 29.86 30

51. 8 2345 29.86 30

51. 8 04/21/83 0045 29.84 30 46.0 0145 29.92 30 46.0 0245 30.03 30 48.2 0445 30.00 30 41.0 0545 30.01 30 43.0 0645 30.00 33 44.0 0745 30.03 35 46 0845 30.03 35 48.0 0945 30.02 33 53 1045 30.02 34 57 1145 30.00 35 57 1245 30.00 33 59 1345 30.00 33 59 1445 29.65 35 63 1545 29.63 34.5 63.5 i

1645 29.98 35.0 65 Page 2 of 3

ATTACHMENT 3.2A (Cont'd)

Barometric Dew Point Dry Bulb Pressure Temperature Temperature Date Time (in. Hg)

(OF)

(OF) 4/21/83 1745 29.99 35.0 62 1845 30.00 41 57 1945 30.05 43 53 2045 30.02 45 55 2145 30.02 43 53 2245 30.02 43 52 2345 30.04 30 51 04/22/83 0045 30.04 30 51 0124 - Complete CILRT Page 3 of 3*

ATTACHMENT 3.28 INSTRUMENTATION The fo I I owing instrumentation was calibrated, and functionally tested no greater than 6 months prior to the performance of this test and in accordance with 10CFR50, Appendix J, and field ca I ibration procedures using instrumentation traceable to the National Bureau of St~ndards.

Weight Computer Instrument Factor Point Range Zone Accurac~

Sensitivit~

RTD-LM-100-1 0.025697 T4019A 55-105°F F

+/-0.1°F

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-2 0.022766 T4033A 55-105°f f

+/-0. 1 Of

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-3 0.025609 T4034A 55-105°f f

+/-0. 1 Of

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-4 0.014484 T4035A 55-105°f E

+/-0.1°f

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-5 0.088892 T4036A 55-105°f B

+/-0.1°f

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-6 0.088892 T4037A 55-105°f B

+/-0. 1 Of

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-7 0.088892 T4038A 55-105°F C

+/-0 o 1 Of

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-8 0.088892 T4023A 55-105°f

.C

+/-0.1°f

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-9 0.049432 Y4010A 55-105°f A

+/-0.1°f

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-10 0.049432 Y4011A 55-105°F A

+/-0. 1 Of

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-11 0.049432 Y4015A 55-105°f A

+/-0.1 Of

+/-0.09°f RT-D-LM-100-12 0.024442 Y4019A 55-105°f D

+/-0.1°F

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-13 0.024442 Y4051A 55-i05°f D

+/-0.1°f

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-14 0.024442 Y4005A 55-105°f E

+/-0. 1 Of

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-15 0.024442 T4003A 55-105°f E

+/-0. 1 Of

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-16 0.043602 Y4009A 55-105°f J

+/-0.1°f

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-17 0.043602 T4017A 55-105°f J

+/-0.1°f

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-18 0.043602 T4018A 55-105°f J

+/-0.1°F

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-21 0.024296 T4028A 55-105°f G

+/-0. 1 ° f

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-22 0.053389 T4031A 55-105°f G

+/-0. 1 ° f

+/-0.09°f RTD-LM-100-23 0.035157 T4032A 55-105°F H

+/-0. 1 Of

+/-0.09°f

Page 1 of 2

ATTACHMENT 3.28 (Cont'd)

Weight Computer Instrument Factor Point Range Zone Accuracy Sensitivity RTD-LM-100-24 0.024778 Y4031A 55-105°F

+/-0. 1 °F

+/-0.09°F RTD-LM-100-25

o. 021109 N0060A 55-105°F H

+/-0.1°F

+/-0.09°F RTD-LM-100-26 0.020279 N0062A 55-105°F

+/-0. 1 Of

+/-0.09°F MT-LM-100-6

o. 14064 Y4000A

-40 to +200°F K

+/-0.4°F

+/-0.05°F MT-LM-100-7 0.14064 Y4001A

-40 to +200°F K

+/-0.4°F

+/-0.05°F MT-LM-100-8 0.23959 Y4002A

-40 to +200°F L

+/-0.4°F

+/-0.05°F MT-LM-100-9 0.23959 Y4003A

-40 to +200°F L

+/-0.4°F

+/-0.05°F MT-LM-100-10 0.23959 Y4004A

-40 to +200°F L

+/-0.4°F

+/-0.05°F PI-LM-106 0.5 U0962 0-100 psia

+/-0.068 psi a +/-0.001%

PI-LM-107 0.5 U0963 0-100 psia

+/-0.068 psia +/-0.001%

Page 2 of 2

RTD*6 RTD-11 RTD-2 RT0-5L-----\\-~---~~

NOTES:

1. RTD-1 = RTD-LM-100.;l (TYP)

Z. RTD -19, 20 NOT USED

3. INSTRUMENT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE PLAN VIEW ATTACHMENT '3.2C CILRT TEMPERATURE DETECTOR LOCATIONS RTD-25 RTD-8 RT0-9 SURRY NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 1 PAGEIOF2

NOTES:

RTD-5 RTD-15 RTD-4

l. RTD-1 = RTD-LM-100-l(TYP)

2. RTD-19, 20 NOT USED

3. INSTRUMENT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE RTD-1 EL -27 1-1' 1

PROFILE VIEW PAGE 20F2 ATTACHMENT 3.2C CILRT TEMPERATURE DETECTOR LOCATIONS SURRY NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNITl

NOTES:

1. MT-6= MT-LM-100-6 (TYP)

2. INSTRUMENT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE PLAN VIEW ATTACHMENT 3.20 CILRT DEWPOINT TEMPERATURE SENSOR LOCATIONS SURRY NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 1 PAGE l OF2

NOTES:

1. MT-6 = MT-LM -100-6 (TYP)

2. INSTRUMENT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE EL.142' ZONE J ZONE K EL.12 1-6 11 PROFILE VIEW ATTACHMENT 3.20 CILRT DEWPOINT TEMPERATURE SENSOR LOCATIONS SURRY NUCLEAR POWER STATIO.N-UNITT PAGE20F2

3.3 Test Results 3.3.1 Analysis of Test Results The test data for the period of 2104 hours0.0244 days 0.584 hours 0.00348 weeks 8.00572e-4 months on April 20, 1983, through 0124 hours0.00144 days 0.0344 hours 2.050265e-4 weeks 4.7182e-5 months on April 22, 1983, were analyzed for the final test results using VEPCO's time sharing computer program.

The reduced input data, mass point analysis

results, and the representative graphs are contained in Attachments 3.3A through 3.3E.

In order to evaluate the effect of the component cooling (CC) water temperature fluctuations on the containment air temperature and therefore on the reported leakage rate, the Type A test period has been divided into three distinct time periods.

These time periods, or regions, are identified on the containment air temperature and air mass plots contained on Attachments 3.3C and 3.3D.

The regions are as follows:

Region I -

Depicts trend data from 2104 hours0.0244 days 0.584 hours 0.00348 weeks 8.00572e-4 months on April 20, 1983, to 0804 hours0.00931 days 0.223 hours 0.00133 weeks 3.05922e-4 months on April 21, 1983.

Region II -

Depicts trend data from 0804 hours0.00931 days 0.223 hours 0.00133 weeks 3.05922e-4 months on April 21, 1983, to 1504 hours0.0174 days 0.418 hours 0.00249 weeks 5.72272e-4 months on April 21, 1983.

Region III - Depicts trend data from 1504 hours0.0174 days 0.418 hours 0.00249 weeks 5.72272e-4 months on April 21, 1983, to 0104 hours0.0012 days 0.0289 hours 1.719577e-4 weeks 3.9572e-5 months on April 22, 1983.

The regions were determined primarily by observing the magnitude and algebraic sign of the slope of the containment air temperature plot.

The temperature curve could easily be divided into more regions (as many as six) based entirely on

slope, however three regions are sufficient to demonstrate the CC effect on the leakage rate.

The leakage rate of each region is summarized below:

Region I

II III Leakage rate (%/day) 0.066 0.116 0.038 This leakage rate is based on the total mass loss during each interval with a conversion to percent per day.

The likelihood of obtaining an extended time period with an essentially constant temperature slope (due to Unit 2

Startup) was doubtful.

Thus, the decision was made to use the entire twenty-eight hours as the reported leakage rate realizing that the actual leakage rate would be much lower.

3.3-1

The Absolute Method of Mass Point Analysis results for the reported containment leakage rate are 0.068774 percent per day.

This satisfies the procedural acceptance criteria of 0.072 percent per day which is 0.075 percent per day less the Type C penalty for valves on systems not vented to the containment.

The results, including corrections for Type Band C leakage, are outlined in Section 3.3.2.

The Type A test pump back method.

within 0.25La of 3. 3. 3.

calculations were verified by the mass The computer calculated air mass was the metered mass, as shown in Section 3.3-2

3.3.2 59.7 psia CILRT Results The 59.7 psia CILRT was conducted in accordance with Section 5.0*of periodic test procedure 1-PT-16.3

1. Measured Leakage Rate, Lam

2. 95 Percent Confidence Level

3. Leakage Penalties:

i. Measured Type B Leakage ii. Measured Type C Leakage ii. Total Leakage added to CILRT results (i + ii)

4. Lam Leakage with confidence Level and penalties (1 + 2 + 3ii)

%/DAY 0.0 0.003 0.003

%/Day 0.066756 0.002018 0.071774 Results of the CILRT are acceptable as the measured leakage rate, with confidence level and required penalties, is below the procedural criteria of 0.075 percent per day.

3.3-3

3.3.3 Verification Test Results The supplemental verification test was performed using the Mass Pump Back Method in accordance with Section 5.0 of 1-PT-16.3.

a. Total measured gas flow into containment

b. Difference between initial and final computer air mass readings

c. Difference between measured gas and calculated gas (a-b)

d. 0.25 La verification limit 546 lbm 479 lbm 67 lbm 136 lbm Results of the Mass Step Change Verification Test are acceptable as the difference between the verification test data and the Type A test data is within 0.25 La.

3.3-4

ATTACHMENT 3.3A CONTAINMENT INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST From 2104 Hours on 4/20/83 to 0124 Hours on 4/22/83 INPUT VARIABLES Time Abs. Press.

Vap. Press.

Abs. Temp.

Dewpoint iQtl (psia)

(psia)

(OR)

(OF) 2104 61.128 0.3446

.535. 39 68.49 2204 61.126

0. 3457 535.41 68.58 2304 61.127

0. 3470 535.43 68.69 0004 61.127 0.3480 535.43 68.77 0104 61.126

0. 3493 535.44 68.88 0204 61.126 0.3508 535.44 69.01 0304 61.125 0.3522 535.43 69.12 0404 61.124 0.3536 535.41 69.24 0504 61.120 0.3547 535.37 69.33 0604 61.112 0.3565 535.28 69.48 0704 61.101 0.3579 535.21 69.59 0804 61.101 0.3598 535.18 69.75 0904 61.105

0. 3621 535.24 69.93 1004 61.112 0.3637 535.29 70.06 1104 61.113 0.3658 535.31 70.23 1204 61.120 0.3674 535.40 70.36 1304 61.127 0.3693 535.44 70.51 1404 61.135 0.3714 535.53 70.68 1504 61.156 0.3740 535.72 70.88 1604 61.147 0.3757 535.63 71.02 Page 1 of 2

ATTACHMENT 3. 3A (Cont'd)

Time Abs. Press.

Vap. Press.

Abs. Temp.

Dewpoint

~

(psia)

(OR)

(OF) 1704 61.158 0.3784 535.71 71.23 1804 61.176 0.3811 535.87 71.44 1904 61.194 0.3839 536.00

71. 65 2004

61. 215

0. 3863 536.18

71. 84 2104

61. 225 0.3896

536.23 72.09 2204 61.230 0.3923 536.27 72.29 2304

61. 236 0.3947 536.31 72.47 0004 61.244 0.3969 536.36 72.64 0104

61. 249 0.3995 536.40 72.83 0124

61. 253 0.4004 536.41 72.90 Page 2 of 2

ATTACHMENT 3.3B CONTAINMENT INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST From 2104 Hours on 04/20/83 to 0124 Hours on 04/22/83 ABSOLUTE METHOD TEST RESULTS Time Mass of Air Leak Rate 95 Pct Conf.

UCL D!tl (lbm)

(pct/day)

(pct/day) 2104 551 593.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 2204 551 545.5 0.189 185 0.418 751 0.607 936 2304 551 522.1 0.106 698 0.085 213 0.191 911 0004 551 513.5 0.078 012 0.039 328 0.117 340 0104 551 482.2 0.080 739 0.022 483 0.103 222 0204 551 468.0 0.082 631 0.014 495 0.097 127 0304 551 457.2 0.079 034 0.010 231 0.089 265 0404 551 455.6 0.071 137 0.008 549 0.079 686 0504 551 450.6 0.064 107 0.007 596 0.071 703 0604 551 454.1 0.056 804 0.007 263 0.064 067 0704 551 414.2 0.058 645 0.006 016 0.064 660 0804 551 427.3 0.055 811 0.005 264 0.061 075 0904 551 381. 7 0.056 973 0.004 542 0.061 516 1004 551 379.1 0.057 272 0.003 883 0.061 154 1104 551 348.4 0.055 899 0.004 006 0.059 905 1204 551 304.5 0.059 160 0.004 011 0.063 171 1304 551 309.8 0.062 242 0.003 910 0.066 152 1404 551 270.3 0.066 031 0.004 021 0.070 053 1504 551 242.2 0.068 476 0.003 876 0.072 351 1604 551 237.0 0.069 919 0.003 604 0.073 523 1704 551 230.1 0.070 295 0.003 279 0.073 575 Page 1 of 2

ATTACHMENT 3.3B (Cont'd)

Time Mass of.Air Leak Rate 95 Pct Conf.

UCL 1htl

( lbrn)

(pct/day)

(pct/day) 1804 551 204.2 0.071 385 0.003 038 0.074 423 1904 551 209.0 0.072 122 0.002 819 0.074 942 2004 551 191.8 0.071 508 0.002 611 0.074 120 2104 551 201.2 0.070 676 0.002 444 0.073 120 2204 551 181.5 0.070 103 0.002 275 0.072 379 2304 551 173.1 0.069 157 0.002 165 0.071 322 0004 551 173.6 0.068 180 0.002 088 0.070 269 0104 551 154.7 0.067 270 0.002 004 0.069 274 0124 551 172.1 0.066 756 0.002 018 0.068 774 Page 2 of 2

0020 WI-0010 LH HZ 00b2 I- ::J 00E2

Z 0022 (J) 0

>HI-0012 I- (J) wa:w II I NOI~Jcl 0002 Cl:'. I-I-

J (J) 0061 I-w 0081 a: Cl:'. I-Cl:'. w a:

00t.. 1 w :s: Cl:'.

a.. 0 009 r UL a..~

MW a:

00£!

I-Cl'.: w 00b1 er, a: _J er, 1-W 00E1 OJ 1-Z _JQ I zwuw 0021......

W L::ll-II NOI~Jcl

(\\J LZZCI:

0011 I

IH Cl'.:

v u a: >- (._9 0001 a: I-Cl'.: w 0060 1-Zel'.:I-I- 0 ::J Z 0080 CT:U(J)H 00t..0 0090 00£0 U) 00b0

~

)

I NOI~Jcl 00E0 0

0020 z

0010 00b2 I

00E2 La.I 0022 er, J:

0012 ~

~

0002 IS) 006! ~

008 r v 00 t r IS)

IS)

IS) v er,

(\\J IS) 01 OJ f"-

(.0 LI) v er,

(\\J

(.0

(.D

(.0 LI)

LI)

LD LD LI)

LD LD LD LD er, er, er, er, er, er, er, er, er, er, er, er, er, er, LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD

~~Ja - 3~nll::t~3dW3!

I~

551750 551700 551650 J::

551600 m 551550

_J I

551500 UJ 551450 en

([

551400 J:

~ 551350 a:

551300 551250 551200 I

I I

.H z

0 H

l9 w

ct H

H z

0 H

l9 w

ct H

H H

z 0

H l9 w

ct QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ

~mmQ-ruM~-ruM~mw~mmQ-ruM~mw~mmQ-ruM~-ru

---rururururuQQQQQQQQQ----------rururururuQQ 4-20-83 TIM£ -

HOURS 4-21-83 ATTACHMENT 3.3D CONTAINMENT AIR MASS VS. TIME SURRY NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT 1 INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST

-I

l M

I J:

0 C

o U) 1700

_p. 1800

~ 1900 (S) 2000 cb 2100 w 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900

_p. 1000

,{, 1100

...... 1200 cb 1300 w 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 (S)

I\\)

Ul LEAK RAT£ -

~/DRY (S)

Ul (S)

I\\)

Ul Ul (S)

"'1 Ul

SECTION 4 LOCAL LEAK RATE TEST (TYPE BAND C) A summarizes the Local Leak Rate Test (LLRT) data that was established to support the overall containment leakage testing program. B summarizes the leakage penalties added to the Type A overall leakage for systems that were either isolated or not vented and drained during the Type A Test, These LLRTs were performed by pressurizing the listed penetrations and either measuring leakage across the containment isolation valves (Type C) or across the resilient seals (Type B).

The acceptance criteria for Type Band C testing is in accordance with 10CFRSO, Appendix J (Reference LER 83-018).

The combined leakage rate for all penetrations and valves, subject to Type B and C tests, is well below the acceptable leakage rate of 0.6 La or 165 scfh.

4-1

Penetrat Ion 7

Safety Injection 15 Charging Type Test C

C 19 Cha rg i ng C

20 Safety C

Injection 21 Safety C

Injection 23 Safety C

Injection 24 Residual Heat C

Removal 28 Chemical and C

Volume Contra I 32 Gaseous C

Waste 33 Gaseous C

Ora ins 38 Aerated Ora In 42 Service Air C

C Equipment/Valves Tested 1-Sl-150 MOV-1867C MOV-1867D 1-CH-309 MOV-1289A MOV-1381 1-Sl-32 MOV-1842 MOV-1869B MOV-RH-100 HCV-1200 A,B,C TV-1204 TV-GW-106 TV-GW-107 TV-DG-108A TV-DG-108B TV-DA-100A TV-DA-100B 1-SA-60 1-SA-62 ATTACHMENT 4A LOCAL LEAK RATE TEST DATA Prerepa i r Leakage (scfh),

Date 0.0 (4-11-83) 0.0 (4-11-83) 0.0 (4-11-83) 0.0 (3-19-83) 0.7 (3-19-83) 0.0 (2-24-83) 0.0 (2-23-83) 0.0 (2-15-83)

0. 0 ( 2-11-83) 1.9 (2-16-83) 4.6 (3-29-83) 0.0 (4-1-83) 0.0 (3-28-83) 0.0 (3-28-83) 15.0 (3-18-83) 2.75 (3-18-83)

>98 (4-7-83)

>98 (4-7-83) 0.0 (2-21-83) 0.0 (2-21-83)

Page 1 of 6 Postrepa i r Leakage (scfh),

Date 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1. 9 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1. 4 ( 4-11-83) 0.0 (4-9-83) 0.0 (4-13-83) 5.5 (4-16-83) 0.0 0.0 MR No., Date, Repair NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA S1303182021 (4-7-83) Replaced seat, Lapped seat and plug, Replaced gasket set, cleaned valve S1303182023 (6-7-83) Lapped plug and seat, Adjusted stroke S1304072121 (4-8-83) Replaced seat ring and p I ug S1304072123 (4-8-83) Replaced gauge and plug, seat ring, stem, and diaphragm NA

ATTACHMENT 4A (Cont'd)

Prerepa i r Postrepa i r Type Equipment/Valves Leakage (scfh),

Leakage ( scfh),

Penetration Test Tested Date Date MR No. 1 Date, Repair 43 Air C

1-RM-3

>8 (3-28-83)

1. 7 (4-9-83)

S1303282229 (3-30-83) Replaced Monitoring pivot shaft, lapped disc and seat TV-RM-lOOA 0.0 (3-28-83) 0.0 NA 44 Air C

TV-RM-100B Q.O (3-28-83) 0.0 NA Monitoring TV-RM-lOOC 0.0 (3-28-83) 0.0 45 Primary C

1-RC-160 1.8 (3-31-83)

1. 8 NA Grade Water TV-1519A 0.0 (3-31-83) 0.0 46 Charging C

FCV-1160

>98 (2-16-83) o.o (4-8-83)

S1302160745 (3-24-83) Rep laced stem, plug and gauge assembly, gaskets S1304050803 (4-7-83) Lapped seat and plug, Replaced gasket, Cleaned valve 47 Instrument C

1-IA-446 0.0 (3-25-83) 0.0 NA Air 1-IA-939 o.o (3-25-83) 0.0 NA TV-IA-100

>135 (3-25-83) 0.0 (4-4-83)

S1303250611 (3-31-83) Overhauled valve 48 Vent and C

TV-VG-109A 0.6 (3-15-83) 0.6 Drain TV-VG-109B 30 (3-15-83) 0.0 (3-22-83)

S1303150801 (3-18-83) Cleaned valve, Replaced o-ring and gasket 50 Safety C

TV-Sl-lOlA 0.6 (3-11-83) 0.6 NA Injection TV-Sl-101B 0.0 (3-11-83) 0.0 51 Service C

l-SW-206 1.4 (3-2-83) 1.4 NA Water 1-SW-208 0.0 (3-2-83) o.o 53 Safety C

1-Sl-234 0.85 (3-21-83) 0.85 NA Injection TV-Sl-100 o.o (3-21-83) 0.0 54 Primary C

1-VA-1 0.0 (2-21-83) 0.0 NA Vent 1-VA-6 o.o (2-21-83) o.o 55A Leakage C

TV-LM-lOOE 0.0 (2-14-83) o.o NA Monitoring TV-LM-lOOF 0.0 (2-14-83) 0.0 55D Sample C

TV-SS-104A 0.055 (4-8-83) 0.055 NA System TV-SS-104B 0.0 (4-2-83) o.o Page 2 of 6

Pe net ration 56B Sample System 56C Sample System 56D Sample system 57A Leakage Monitoring 57C Sample System 57D Drain System 58 Instrument Air 60 Safety Injection 61 Safety Injection 62 Safety Injection Type Test C

C C

C Equipment/Valves Tested TV-SS-106A TV-SS-106B TV-SS-100A TV-SS-100B TV-SS-102A TV-SS-102B TV-LM-100G TV-LM-100H TV-SS-101A TV-SS-101B TV-DA-103A TV-DA-103B 2-IA-446 1-IA-938 MOV-1890A MOV-1890C MOV-1864A MOV-1864B MOV-1890B ATTACHMENT 4A (Cont'd)

Prerepa i r Leakage (scfhl, Oate 1. 0 ( 4-2-83 )

o.o (4-6-83) o.o (4-2-83) 0.8 (4-2-83) o.o (4-2-83) 0.0 (4-12-83) o.o (2-14-83) o.o (2-14-83) o.o (4-2-83) 0.088 (4-2-83) o.o (2-23-83) o.o (2-23-83) 0.6 (2-22-83) 0.5 (2-22-83) o.o (2-9-83) 0.0 (2-10-83) o.o (2-10-83) o.o (2-10-83) 8.0 (2-9-83)

Page 3 of 6 Postrepa i r Leakage ( scfh),

Date 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.088 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 MR No., Date, Repair NA NA NA NA NA S1302232331 (2-28-83) Adjusted packing S1302232333 (2-28-83) Adjusted packing S1302222231 (3-22-83) Tightened coup I ing between valve and piping S1302222232 (3-22-83) Tightened coup I ing between valve and piping S1302222233 (3-16-83) Replaced flange gasket NA NA NA

ATTACHMENT 4A (Cont'd)

Prerepair Postrepa i r Type Equipment/Valves Leakage (scfh),

Leakage (scfh),

Penetration Test Tested Date Date MR No., Date, Re[!a i r 63 Containment C

1-CS-24 o.o (3-8-83) 0.0 NA Spray MOV-CS-101C,D 1.4 (3-8-83) 1.4 S1303082311 (3-30-83) Repacked valve packing gland S1303082309 (3-30-83) Replaced flange gaskets S1303082305 (3-30-83) Cleaned and inspected f I a nge surfaces 64 Containment C

1-CS-13 0.0 (3-9-83) 0.0 NA Spray MOV-CS-101A,B 1.6 (3-19-83) 1.6 66 Recirculation C

MOV-RS-155B

>135 (3-23-83) 0.0 (3-26-83)

Sl303231959 (3-25-,83) Adjusted Spray mechanical stops 67 Safety C

MOV-1860B o.o ( 3-17-83) 0.0 NA Injection 68 Safety C

MOV-1860A Injection 0.0 (3-17-83) 0.0 NA 69 Recirculation C

MOV-RS-155A

>135 (3-23-83) 0.0 (3-26-83)

Sl303231957 (3-25-83) Adjusted Spray mechanical stops 70 Rec i rcu I at ion C

1-RS-11 0.0 (3-5-83) 0.0 NA Spray MOV-RS-156B 0.0 (3-7-83) 0.0 71 Rec i rcu I at ion C

1-RS-17

>135 (3-5-83) 0.0 (4-12-83)

S1303051701 (3-10-83) Cleaned Spray valve and rep laced seating rubber MOV-RS-156A o.o ( 3-10-83) 0.0 NA 89 Air Ejector C

1-VP-12

l. 3 (3-8-83)

,. 3 NA Discharge TV-SV-102A 14.7 (3-10-83) 0.0 (4-14-83)

Sl304050801 (4-6-83) Repaired stem disk, Adjusted I imits Sl303101504 (3-21-83) Lapped seat and plug, Replaced gasket, Cleaned valve 90 Vent i I at ion C

MOV-VS-100C,D 1.2 (4-12-83) 1.2 NA 91 Ventilation C

MOV-VS-100A

>135 (4-9-83) 0.0 (4-14-83)

S1304091805 (4-12-83) Cleaned valve MOV-VS-100B 0.0 (4-14-83) 0.0 NA MOV-VS-102 0.0 (4-14-83) o.o NA Page 4 of 6

ATTACHMENT 4A (Cont'd)

Prerepa i r Post repair Type Equipment/Valves Leakage ( scfh),

Leakage ( scfh),

Penetration Test Tested Date Date MR No., Date, Re(!a i r 92 Containment C

TV-GW-100 0.0 (4-1-83) 0.0 NA Vacuum TV-GW-101 0.0 (4-1-83) 0.0 NA TV-CV-150C 26 (3-11-83)

1. 1 (3-26-83)

S1303110903 (3-18-83) Rep I aced gauge, gaskets, and ring; Lapped seat and plug; Cleaned valve TV-CV-150D 115 (3-11-83) 0.5 (3-26-83)

S1303110901 (3-18-83) Rep laced gauge, gaskets, and ring; Lapped seat and p I ug; Cleaned valve 93 Containment C

TV-GW-104 0.0 (4-1-83) 0.0 NA Vacuum TV-GW-105 0.0 (4-1-83) 0.0 NA TV-CV-150A 14 (3-16-83) 0.0 (3-25-83)

S1303162057 (3-23-83) Lapped plug and seat TV-CV-150B 10 (3-28-83) 0.0 (3-30-83)

S1303281113 (3-29-83) Lapped plug and seat 94 Containment C

HCV-CV-100 0.9 (2-21-83) 0.. 9 NA Vacuum 1-cv-2

>74 (2-21-83) 1.2 (3-24-83)

S1302212317 (3-22-83) Cleaned disc and sea I; Genera I valve cleanup 97A Leakage C

TV-LM-lOOA 0.0 (2-14-83) 0.0 NA Monitoring TV-LM-100B 0.0 (2-14-83) 0.0 97D Sample C

TV-SS-103A 0.0 (4-11-83) 0.0 NA System TV-SS-103B 0.0 (4-8-83) 0.0 100 Gaseous C

TV-GW-102 0.0 (3-28-83) 0.0 NA Waste TV-GW-103 0.0 (3-28-83) 0.0 101 Fi re C

1-FP-151 0.0 (4-5-83) 0.0 NA Protection 1-FP-152 0.0 (4-5-83) 0.0 103 Reactor C

1-RL-3 0.0 (2-23-83) 0.0 NA Cavity 1-RL-5 0.0 (2-23-83) 0.0 Purification 104 Reactor C

1-RL-13 0.0 (2-23-83) 0.0 NA Cavity 1-RL-15 0.0 (2-23-83) 0.0 Purification 105A Post C

TV-GW-111A 0.0 (4-15-83) 0.0 S1302061820 (2-7-83) Replaced Accident coi I on valve actuator Sampling TV-GW-111B 0.0 (4-15-83) 0.0 NA 105D Leakage C

TV-LM-lOOC 0.0 (2-14-83) 0.0 NA Monitoring TV-LM-lOOD 0.0 (2-14-83) 0.0 Page 5 of 6

ATTACHMENT 4A (Cont'd)

Prerepa i r Postrepa i r Type Equipment/Valves Leakage (scfh),

Leakage (scfh),

Penetration Test Tested Date Date MR No., Date, Re!;!a i r 106 Safety C

1-Sl-73 Inject ion 0.0 (2-22-83) 0.0 NA 112 Instrument C

TV-IA-101A 0.8 (3-31-83) 0.0 NA Air TV-IA-101B 0.0 (3-31-83) 0.0

113 Safety C

1-Sl-174 0.0 (2-15-83) o.o NA Injection MOV-1869A 0.0 (2-15-83) 0.0 Personnel Air Lock B

a-ring 3.2 (5-4-83) 0.0 NA Equipment Hatch B

a-ring 0.0 (4-19-83) o.o NA Fuel Transfer B

a-ring

1. 381 (4-8-83) 1.381 NA Tube Emergency Air Lock B

a-ring 0.8 (4-19-83) 0.8 NA Al I electrical penetrations and other Type B penetrations were tested prior to perfo*rmance of the CILRT with a combined leakage of 0.21534 scfh.

Page 6 of 6

ATTACHMENT 48 LEAKAGE PENALTIES ADDED TO TYPE A LEAKAGE Type Equipment/Valves Leakage Penetration Test Tested

( Scf/hourl Remarks 20 Safety Injection C

1-Sl-32 o.o Isolated during Type A Test 24 Residual Heat Removal C

MOV-RH-100

,. 9 Water Fi I led during Type A Test 28 Chemical and Volume C

HCV-1200A, B, C 4.6 Isolated during Type A Test Control TV-1204 45 Primary Grade Water C

1-RC-160 TV-1519A 1.8 Isolated during Type A Test 55A Leakage Monitoring C

TV-LM-100E o.o TV-LM-100F In use during Type A Test 57A Leakage Monitoring C

TV-LM-100G 0.0 In use during Type A Test TV-LM-100H 97A Leakage Monitoring C

TV-LM-100A 0.0 In use during Type A Test TV-LM-100B 101 Fi re Protection C

1-FP-151 0.0 Isolated during Type A Test 1-FP-152 105D Leakage Monitoring C

TV-LM-lOOC TV-LM-100D 0.0 In use during Type A Test Page 1 of 1

ML18141A057

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search