ML17228A570: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:INDEXLISTOFTABLES{Continued)
{{#Wiki_filter:INDEX LIST    OF TABLES            {Continued)
$$$$$$$$$$$$'$$$$$'$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$TABLE3.7-1PAGMAXIMUMALLOWABLE LINEARPOWERLEVEL-HIGH TRIPSETPOINTWITHINOPERABLE STEAMLINESAFETYVALVESDURINGOPERA-TIONWITHBOTHSTEAMGENERATORS......................
TABLE                                                                                                                                  PAG 3.7-1            MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LINEAR POWER LEVEL-HIGH TRIP SETPOINT WITH INOPERABLE STEAM LINE SAFETY VALVES DURING OPERA-TION WITH BOTH STEAM                        GENERATORS......................                                     3/4 7-2 STEAM        LINE SAFETY VALVES PER LOOP...                                                                     3/4 7-3 4.7-1            SECONDARY COOLANT SYSTEM                            SPECIFIC ACTIVITY SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM..                             ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~   3/4 7-8 4.7-2            SNUBBER VISUAL INSPECTION                            INTERVAL....................                               3/4 7-22 3.7-3a            D ELETED ~         ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~   3/4 7-26 3.7-3b            D  ELETED......                                                                                                  3/4 7-27 3.7-4              FIRE HOSE            STATIONS....................................                                               3/4 7-36 3.7-5            YARD FIRE HYDRANTS AND ASSOCIATED HYDRANT HOSE HOUSES                                                            3/4 7-38 4.8-1            DIESEL GENERATOR TEST                          SCHEDULE......"..................                                 3/4 8-8 4.8-2            BATTERY SURVEILLANCE                        REQUIREMENT...'...................                                   3/4 8-12 3.8-1            MOTOR-OPERATED VALVES THERMAL OVERLOAD PROTECTION BYPASS          DEVICES........................................                                                   3/4 8-18 4.1')-1          RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS P ROGRAH  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~       ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~   ~ ~ 3/4 11-2 4.11-2            RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS P ROGRAM  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~       ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~   ~ ~ 3/4 11-8 3.12-1            RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING                                           PROGRAM.........                 3/4 12-3 3.12-2            REPORTING LEVELS fOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN FNVIRONHENTAL                  SAMPLES.................................                                           3/4 12-7 4.12-1            DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONHENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS o          i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~   3/4 12-8 B  3/4.2-1      D ELETED ~       ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~   i' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B 3/4 2-3 B  3/4..4-1      REACTOR VESSEL                  TOUGHNESS..............................                                         B 3/4 4-9
3/47-24.7-1STEAMLINESAFETYVALVESPERLOOP...SECONDARY COOLANTSYSTEMSPECIFICACTIVITYSAMPLEANDANALYSISPROGRAM..
: 5. 7-1            COMPONENT CYCLIC OR TRANSIENT                                  LIMITS..................                           5-5 6.2-1            MINIMUM SHIFT CREW COHPOSITION-TWO UNITS WITH TWO SEPARATE CONTROL ROOMS                                                                                            6-5 9406010046 940523 PDR      ADDt K 05000389                        i PDR, ~~"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~3/47-33/47-84.7-23.7-3a3.7-3b3.7-43.7-54.8-14.8-23.8-1SNUBBERVISUALINSPECTION INTERVAL....................
ST. LUCIE UNIT 2                                                  XXV                                          Amendment No.         S,.M 53
3/47-22ELETED~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~DELETED......
 
DFIREHOSESTATIONS....................................
'I ~
3/47-263/47-273/47-36MOTOR-OPERATED VALVESTHERMALOVERLOADPROTECTION BYPASSDEVICES........................................
  ~ ~
3/48-18YARDFIREHYDRANTSANDASSOCIATED HYDRANTHOSEHOUSES3/47-38DIESELGENERATOR TESTSCHEDULE......"..................
a 3/4.7    PLANT SYSTBtS 3/4.7.1    TURBINE CYCLE SAFETY VALVES Lr Cr TING CONDITION      FOR OPERATION 9.7.1.1    All                  line        safety valves shall
3/48-8BATTERYSURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT...'...................
                  /R'r. main steam p
3/48-124.1')-1RADIOACTIVE LIQUIDWASTESAMPLINGANDANALYSISROGRAH~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~P3/411-24.11-2RADIOACTIVE GASEOUSWASTESAMPLINGANDANALYSISROGRAM~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~P3/411-83.12-13.12-24.12-1RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM.........
code                      be OPERABLE~cui4 APPLICABILITY:         MODES  1, Z  and 3.
3/412-3REPORTING LEVELSfORRADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS INFNVIRONHENTAL SAMPLES.................................
ACTION:
3/412-7DETECTION CAPABILITIES FORENVIRONHENTAL SAMPLEB3/4.2-1NALYSISoi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~AELETED~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i'~~~~~DB3/4..4-1REACTORVESSELTOUGHNESS..............................
: a. With both reactor coolant loops and associated            steam generators in operation and with one or more main steam line code safety valves inoperable, operation in MODES 1, 2 and 3 may proceed provided that, within 4 hours, either the inoperable valve is restored to OPERABLE status or the Power Level-High trip setpoint is reduced per Table 3.7-1; otherwise, be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours and 'in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours.
3/412-8B3/42-3B3/44-95.7-16.2-1MINIMUMSHIFTCREWCOHPOSITION-TWO UNITSWITHTWOSEPARATECONTROLROOMS6-5COMPONENT CYCLICORTRANSIENT LIMITS..................
: b. The    provisions of Specification 3.0.4 are not applicable.
5-59406010046 940523PDRADDtK05000389iPDR,~~"ST.LUCIE-UNIT2XXVAmendment No.S,.M53
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.7.1.     E  ch  m  in s    am  li e  code s fety val    shall e demon trated PERA (E, w~thJlif sett        ngs  nd  or    ice siz as show in Tab 4.7-0 in ac rdan wig    Se  ion    I  o  the      NE Boile and Pre sure Yes el Cod , 1974      dftio .
'I~  
rt4 cac/HiXjo~al Jo'der<'y'<rvcwr Ee~~y~d ~w~pJ o 7g~~
~~a3/4.7PLANTSYSTBtS3/4.7.1TURBINECYCLESAFETYVALVESLrCrTINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 9.7.1.1AllmainsteamlinecodesafetyvalvesshallbeOPERABLE~cui4
                              " ">"- ~~v                   ~~.-
/R'r.pAPPLICABILITY:
ST. LUG IE    - UNIT 2                      3/4 7-1              Amendment No8
MODES1,Zand3.ACTION:a.Withbothreactorcoolantloopsandassociated steamgenerators inoperation andwithoneormoremainsteamlinecodesafetyvalvesinoperable, operation inMODES1,2and3mayproceedprovidedthat,within4hours,eithertheinoperable valveisrestoredtoOPERABLEstatusorthePowerLevel-High tripsetpointisreducedperTable3.7-1;otherwise, beinatleastHOTSTANDBYwithinthenext6hoursand'inCOLDSHUTDOWNwithinthefollowing 30hours.b.Theprovisions ofSpecification 3.0.4arenotapplicable.
 
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.7.1.EchminsamliecodesfetyvalshalledemontratedPERA(E,w~thJlifsettngsndoricesizasshowinTab4.7-0inacrdanwigSeionIotheNEBoileandPresureYeselCod,1974dftio.rt4cac/HiXjo~al Jo'der<'y'<rvcwr Ee~~y~d~w~pJo7g~~"">"-~~v~~.-ST.LUGIE-UNIT23/47-1Amendment No8 J''lh VALVENUMBER37-2TABLESTEANLINESAFETYVALVESPERLOOPLIFTSETTING1%ORIFICESI2Ea.e.8202020382048209821082118212.8206820782088213821482158216HeaderAHeaderB820182051000psia1000psia1000psia1000psia1040psia1040psia1040psia1040psia16in.216in.216in.16in.16in.16in.216in.216in.
J'
St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Administrative ChanetoDeleteASMECodeReference ATTACHMENT 2SAFETYANALYSISIntroduction AchangeisproposedtorevisetheSt.LucieUnit2Technical Specifications Section3/4.7.1.1 tochangethereference to,aspecificeditionoftheASMECodetoareference totestinginaccordance withTechnical Specification 4.0.5andrenumberthesafetyvalvesetpointTable4.7-0toTable3.7-2.Thelistoftablesintheindexisalsorevised.Discussion TheproposedchangetotheSt.LucieUnit2Technical Specifications revisesthespecificreference totheSectionXIoftheASMEBoilerandPressureVesselCode,1974EditiontobesimilartotheUnit1Technical Specification andconsistent withtherevisedStandardTechnical Specifications forCombustion Engineering Plants,NUREG1432.Inaddition, thechangerenumbers thesafetyvalvesetpointtablefromasurveillance tabletoanLimitingCondition forOperation (LCO)table.Surveillance requirement 4.7.1.1currently statesthat,eachmainsteamlinecodesafetyvalveshallbedemonstrated
'l h
: OPERABLE, withliftsettingsandorificesizesasshowninTable4.7-0,inaccordance withSectionXIoftheASMEBoilerandPressureVesselCode,1974Edition.TheEditionoftheASMECodeendorsedforthesecondtenyearintervalforSt.LucieUnit2isthe1986EditionoftheASMECode.Thisproposedchangerelocates thereference tothesetpointtabletoLimitingCondition forOperation (LCO)3.7.1.1andrenumbers thetableaccordingly.
 
ThisTechnical Specification changeeliminates theneedforfuturechangestotheTechnical Specification becauseSpecification 4.0.5ensuresthatin-service testingofASMECodeClass1,2and3pumpsandvalveswillbeperformed inaccordance withaperiodically updatedversionofSectionXIoftheASMEBoilerandPressureVesselCodeandAddendaasrequiredby10CFR50.55a.
3 7-2 TABLE STEAN LINE SAFETY VALVES PER LOOP VALVE NUMBER                      LIFT SETTING    1%     ORIFICE SI2E Header A Header B
n)*I'  
: a. 8201    8205                  1000 psia            16 in. 2 8202    .8206                  1000 psia            16 in. 2 0203    8207                  1000 psia            16 in.
-St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Administrative ChanetoDeleteASMECodeReference ATTACHMENT 3DETERMINATION OFNOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION Thestandards usedtoarriveatadetermination thatarequestforamendment involvesanosignificant hazardsconsideration areincludedintheCommission sregulation, 10CFR50.92,whichstatesthatnosignificant hazardsconsiderations areinvolvediftheoperation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnot(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(3)involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Eachstandardisdiscussed asfollows:(1)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences of'anaccidentpreviously evaluated.
8204    8208                  1000 psia            16 in.
Theproposedamendment doesnotinvolveasignificant, increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated becausethemainsteamcodesafetyvalveswillcontinuetobetestedinaccordance withcurrentNRCrequirements asimplemented through10CFR50.55a.TheNRCspecifies theASMEcoderequirements
: e. 8209    8213                  1040 psia            16  in.
'forafacilitythroughrevisions to10CFR50.55aandthroughthereviewandapprovaloftheplantspecificin-service testingplanforpumpsandvalvesatthebeginning ofeachin-service inspection interval.
8210    8214                  1040 psia            16  in. 2 8211    8215                  1040 psia            16  in. 2 8212    8216                  1040 psia            16  in.
Theprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentarenotincreased becausetestingofthemainsteamsafetyvalvesisinaccordance withtheappropriate NRCrequirements.
 
(2)Useofthemodifiedspecification wouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent, kindofaccidentfromanypreviously evaluated.
St. Lucie Unit 2 Docket No. 50-389 Proposed License Amendment Administrative Chan e to Delete  ASME Code  Reference ATTACHMENT 2 SAFETY ANALYSIS Introduction A change  is proposed to revise the St. Lucie Unit 2 Technical Specifications Section 3/4.7.1.1 to change the reference to, a specific edition of the ASME Code to a reference to testing in accordance with Technical Specification 4.0.5 and renumber      the safety valve set point Table 4.7-0 to Table 3.7-2. The list of tables in the index is also revised.
Theuseof,thismodifiedspecification cannotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanypreviously evaluated sincethereisnophysicalchangetothefacilityorthesetpointsforthemainsteamsafetyvalves.Thevalveswillbetestedinaccordance withcurrentrequirements.
Discussion The  proposed  change  to the St. Lucie Unit 2 Technical Specifications revises the specific reference to the Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 1974 Edition to be similar to the Unit 1 Technical Specification and consistent with the revised Standard Technical Specifications for Combustion Engineering Plants, NUREG 1432. In addition, the change renumbers the safety valve set point table from a surveillance table to an Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) table.
Nonewfailuremodeisintroduced duetothechangebecausenoplantchangeisbeingmadeandmainsteamsafetyvalvetestmethodsareconsistent withtheendorsededitionoftheASMECode.
Surveillance requirement 4.7.1.1 currently states that, each main steam line code safety valve shall be demonstrated OPERABLE, with lift  settings and orifice sizes as shown in Table 4.7-0, in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 1974 Edition. The Edition of the ASME Code endorsed for the second ten year interval for St. Lucie Unit 2 is the 1986 Edition of the ASME Code.
tfIE~It1" 1'IV"(3)Useofthemodifiedspecification wouldnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Theexistingtechnical specification references anoutdatedversionoftheASMECode.Thischangecorrectsthereference toSpecification 4.0.5whichensuresthatin-service testingofASMECodeClass1,2and3pumpsandvalveswillbeperformed inaccordance withaperiodically updatedversionofSectionXIoftheASMEBoilerandPressureVesselCodeandAddendaasrequiredby10CFR50.55a.Safetyvalvesetpoints ortolerances arenotchangedbythisproposal.
This proposed change relocates the reference to the set point table to Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.7.1.1 and renumbers the table accordingly.       This Technical Specification change eliminates the need for future changes to the Technical Specification because Specification 4.0.5 ensures that in-service testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2 and 3 pumps and valves will be performed in accordance with a periodically updated version of Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code and Addenda as required by 10 CFR 50.55a.
Therefore, themodifiedspecification correctstheASMECodereference anddoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Basedontheabove,wehavedetermined thattheproposedamendment doesnot(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated, (2)createtheprobability ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanypreviously evaluated, or(3)involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety;andtherefore doesnotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration.
 
01Iepl}}
  )* I' n
 
-St. Lucie Unit  2 Docket No. 50-389 Proposed License Amendment Administrative   Chan e to Delete  ASME Code Reference ATTACHMENT 3 DETERMINATION OF NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION The standards used to  arrive at a determination that a request for amendment involves a    no significant hazards consideration are included in the Commission s regulation, 10 CFR 50.92, which states that no significant hazards considerations are involved if the operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. Each standard is discussed as follows:
(1) Operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of 'an accident previously evaluated.
The proposed amendment does  not involve a significant, increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated because the main steam code safety valves will continue to be tested in accordance with current NRC requirements as implemented through 10 CFR 50.55a. The NRC specifies the ASME code requirements 'for a facility through revisions to 10 CFR 50.55a and through the review and approval of the plant specific in-service testing plan for pumps and valves at the beginning of each in-service inspection interval. The probability or consequences of an accident are not increased because testing of the main steam safety valves is in accordance with the appropriate NRC requirements.
(2)   Use of the modified specification would not create the possibility of a new or different, kind of accident from any previously evaluated.
The use of, this modified specification can not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated since there is no physical change to the facility or the set points for the main steam safety valves.
The valves will be tested        in accordance with current requirements. No new failure mode is introduced due to the change because no plant change is being made and main steam safety valve test methods are consistent with the endorsed edition of the ASME Code.
 
t f
IE
  ~
I t 1"
 
1 V
I
    "(3)   Use  of the modified specification would not involve        a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
The existing technical specification references an outdated version of the ASME Code. This change corrects the reference to Specification 4.0.5 which ensures that in-service testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2 and 3 pumps and valves will be performed in accordance with a periodically updated version of Section XI of the  ASME Boiler  and Pressure Vessel Code and Addenda as  required by 10 CFR 50.55a.
Safety valve setpoints or tolerances are not changed by this proposal. Therefore, the modified specification corrects the ASME Code reference    and does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
Based on the above, we have determined that the proposed amendment does not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, (2) create the probability of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated, or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety; and therefore does not involve a significant hazards consideration.
 
0 1 I
ep l}}

Latest revision as of 12:35, 4 February 2020

Proposed TS Section 3/4.7.1.1,turbine Cycle,Safety Valves, Deleting Ref to 1974 Edition of ASME Code & Referring to Testing in Accordance W/Ts 4.0.5,ISI & IST Spec
ML17228A570
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/23/1994
From:
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17228A568 List:
References
NUDOCS 9406010046
Download: ML17228A570 (11)


Text

INDEX LIST OF TABLES {Continued)

TABLE PAG 3.7-1 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LINEAR POWER LEVEL-HIGH TRIP SETPOINT WITH INOPERABLE STEAM LINE SAFETY VALVES DURING OPERA-TION WITH BOTH STEAM GENERATORS...................... 3/4 7-2 STEAM LINE SAFETY VALVES PER LOOP... 3/4 7-3 4.7-1 SECONDARY COOLANT SYSTEM SPECIFIC ACTIVITY SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3/4 7-8 4.7-2 SNUBBER VISUAL INSPECTION INTERVAL.................... 3/4 7-22 3.7-3a D ELETED ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3/4 7-26 3.7-3b D ELETED...... 3/4 7-27 3.7-4 FIRE HOSE STATIONS.................................... 3/4 7-36 3.7-5 YARD FIRE HYDRANTS AND ASSOCIATED HYDRANT HOSE HOUSES 3/4 7-38 4.8-1 DIESEL GENERATOR TEST SCHEDULE......".................. 3/4 8-8 4.8-2 BATTERY SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT...'................... 3/4 8-12 3.8-1 MOTOR-OPERATED VALVES THERMAL OVERLOAD PROTECTION BYPASS DEVICES........................................ 3/4 8-18 4.1')-1 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS P ROGRAH ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3/4 11-2 4.11-2 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS P ROGRAM ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3/4 11-8 3.12-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM......... 3/4 12-3 3.12-2 REPORTING LEVELS fOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN FNVIRONHENTAL SAMPLES................................. 3/4 12-7 4.12-1 DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONHENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS o i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3/4 12-8 B 3/4.2-1 D ELETED ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B 3/4 2-3 B 3/4..4-1 REACTOR VESSEL TOUGHNESS.............................. B 3/4 4-9

5. 7-1 COMPONENT CYCLIC OR TRANSIENT LIMITS.................. 5-5 6.2-1 MINIMUM SHIFT CREW COHPOSITION-TWO UNITS WITH TWO SEPARATE CONTROL ROOMS 6-5 9406010046 940523 PDR ADDt K 05000389 i PDR, ~~"

ST. LUCIE UNIT 2 XXV Amendment No. S,.M 53

'I ~

~ ~

a 3/4.7 PLANT SYSTBtS 3/4.7.1 TURBINE CYCLE SAFETY VALVES Lr Cr TING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 9.7.1.1 All line safety valves shall

/R'r. main steam p

code be OPERABLE~cui4 APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, Z and 3.

ACTION:

a. With both reactor coolant loops and associated steam generators in operation and with one or more main steam line code safety valves inoperable, operation in MODES 1, 2 and 3 may proceed provided that, within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, either the inoperable valve is restored to OPERABLE status or the Power Level-High trip setpoint is reduced per Table 3.7-1; otherwise, be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and 'in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
b. The provisions of Specification 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.7.1. E ch m in s am li e code s fety val shall e demon trated PERA (E, w~thJlif sett ngs nd or ice siz as show in Tab 4.7-0 in ac rdan wig Se ion I o the NE Boile and Pre sure Yes el Cod , 1974 dftio .

rt4 cac/HiXjo~al Jo'der<'y'<rvcwr Ee~~y~d ~w~pJ o 7g~~

" ">"- ~~v ~~.-

ST. LUG IE - UNIT 2 3/4 7-1 Amendment No8

J'

'l h

3 7-2 TABLE STEAN LINE SAFETY VALVES PER LOOP VALVE NUMBER LIFT SETTING 1% ORIFICE SI2E Header A Header B

a. 8201 8205 1000 psia 16 in. 2 8202 .8206 1000 psia 16 in. 2 0203 8207 1000 psia 16 in.

8204 8208 1000 psia 16 in.

e. 8209 8213 1040 psia 16 in.

8210 8214 1040 psia 16 in. 2 8211 8215 1040 psia 16 in. 2 8212 8216 1040 psia 16 in.

St. Lucie Unit 2 Docket No. 50-389 Proposed License Amendment Administrative Chan e to Delete ASME Code Reference ATTACHMENT 2 SAFETY ANALYSIS Introduction A change is proposed to revise the St. Lucie Unit 2 Technical Specifications Section 3/4.7.1.1 to change the reference to, a specific edition of the ASME Code to a reference to testing in accordance with Technical Specification 4.0.5 and renumber the safety valve set point Table 4.7-0 to Table 3.7-2. The list of tables in the index is also revised.

Discussion The proposed change to the St. Lucie Unit 2 Technical Specifications revises the specific reference to the Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 1974 Edition to be similar to the Unit 1 Technical Specification and consistent with the revised Standard Technical Specifications for Combustion Engineering Plants, NUREG 1432. In addition, the change renumbers the safety valve set point table from a surveillance table to an Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) table.

Surveillance requirement 4.7.1.1 currently states that, each main steam line code safety valve shall be demonstrated OPERABLE, with lift settings and orifice sizes as shown in Table 4.7-0, in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 1974 Edition. The Edition of the ASME Code endorsed for the second ten year interval for St. Lucie Unit 2 is the 1986 Edition of the ASME Code.

This proposed change relocates the reference to the set point table to Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.7.1.1 and renumbers the table accordingly. This Technical Specification change eliminates the need for future changes to the Technical Specification because Specification 4.0.5 ensures that in-service testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2 and 3 pumps and valves will be performed in accordance with a periodically updated version of Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code and Addenda as required by 10 CFR 50.55a.

)* I' n

-St. Lucie Unit 2 Docket No. 50-389 Proposed License Amendment Administrative Chan e to Delete ASME Code Reference ATTACHMENT 3 DETERMINATION OF NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION The standards used to arrive at a determination that a request for amendment involves a no significant hazards consideration are included in the Commission s regulation, 10 CFR 50.92, which states that no significant hazards considerations are involved if the operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. Each standard is discussed as follows:

(1) Operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of 'an accident previously evaluated.

The proposed amendment does not involve a significant, increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated because the main steam code safety valves will continue to be tested in accordance with current NRC requirements as implemented through 10 CFR 50.55a. The NRC specifies the ASME code requirements 'for a facility through revisions to 10 CFR 50.55a and through the review and approval of the plant specific in-service testing plan for pumps and valves at the beginning of each in-service inspection interval. The probability or consequences of an accident are not increased because testing of the main steam safety valves is in accordance with the appropriate NRC requirements.

(2) Use of the modified specification would not create the possibility of a new or different, kind of accident from any previously evaluated.

The use of, this modified specification can not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated since there is no physical change to the facility or the set points for the main steam safety valves.

The valves will be tested in accordance with current requirements. No new failure mode is introduced due to the change because no plant change is being made and main steam safety valve test methods are consistent with the endorsed edition of the ASME Code.

t f

IE

~

I t 1"

1 V

I

"(3) Use of the modified specification would not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

The existing technical specification references an outdated version of the ASME Code. This change corrects the reference to Specification 4.0.5 which ensures that in-service testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2 and 3 pumps and valves will be performed in accordance with a periodically updated version of Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code and Addenda as required by 10 CFR 50.55a.

Safety valve setpoints or tolerances are not changed by this proposal. Therefore, the modified specification corrects the ASME Code reference and does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

Based on the above, we have determined that the proposed amendment does not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, (2) create the probability of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated, or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety; and therefore does not involve a significant hazards consideration.

0 1 I

ep l