ML17277B042: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 11/07/1983 | | issue date = 11/07/1983 | ||
| title = Rev 6 to Administrative Procedure 1.5.1, Tech Spec Surveillance Testing Program. | | title = Rev 6 to Administrative Procedure 1.5.1, Tech Spec Surveillance Testing Program. | ||
| author name = | | author name = Martin J | ||
| author affiliation = WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM | | author affiliation = WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:~ > | |||
I aA Qgggi~~~ | |||
$Q QW II ASIUNGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM PLANT PROCEDURES MANUAL PROCKDVRK NVMBCR APPROVK OATC | |||
+1.5el 11/07/83 Ol UMC NAMC ADMINISTRATIVE FROCE RES N | |||
: 1. 5 TEST ING | |||
+1.5 el TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SURVEILLANCE TESTING PROGRAM 1.5.1.1 ~Pur oee Plant Surveillance requirements to satisfy Plant Technical Specifications are requirements... relating to test, calibration, or inspection to assure that the necessary quality of systems and components is main-facility operation will be within the safety limits, and tained, that that the limiting conditions of operation will be met 10CFR50.36C(3). | |||
... per The WNP-2 Program for preparation, implementation, control and documenta-tion.to satisfy these surveillance requirements is described in this procedure and will be controlled in accordance with it. A flow chart showing major activities is included as Attachment l. | |||
1.5.1.2 Pro ram Res onsibilit The Technical Department Reactor Engineeririg Supervisor has overall responsibility for the initial coordination of the Technical Specifi-cations as well as maintenance of the document t:" |
Latest revision as of 07:47, 4 February 2020
ML17277B042 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Columbia |
Issue date: | 11/07/1983 |
From: | Martin J WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML17277B035 | List: |
References | |
1.5.1, NUDOCS 8311210272 | |
Download: ML17277B042 (33) | |
Text
~ >
I aA Qgggi~~~
$Q QW II ASIUNGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM PLANT PROCEDURES MANUAL PROCKDVRK NVMBCR APPROVK OATC
+1.5el 11/07/83 Ol UMC NAMC ADMINISTRATIVE FROCE RES N
- 1. 5 TEST ING
+1.5 el TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SURVEILLANCE TESTING PROGRAM 1.5.1.1 ~Pur oee Plant Surveillance requirements to satisfy Plant Technical Specifications are requirements... relating to test, calibration, or inspection to assure that the necessary quality of systems and components is main-facility operation will be within the safety limits, and tained, that that the limiting conditions of operation will be met 10CFR50.36C(3).
... per The WNP-2 Program for preparation, implementation, control and documenta-tion.to satisfy these surveillance requirements is described in this procedure and will be controlled in accordance with it. A flow chart showing major activities is included as Attachment l.
1.5.1.2 Pro ram Res onsibilit The Technical Department Reactor Engineeririg Supervisor has overall responsibility for the initial coordination of the Technical Specifi-cations as well as maintenance of the document t:"iroughout plant life and provide the interface with the AC. The Reactor Engineering Supervisor will assign a Technicial Specification Testing Coordinator to schedule surveillance testing+ activities for the plant. In addition, the Coor-
'inator will be responsible for identifying surveillance tests which must be performed and work with each Department to determine responsibility for testing. Each Department Manager will subsequently assign the re-sponsibility for procedure preparation and testing activities within the Department.
1.5.1.3 Surveillance Procedure Format The procedure format as described in the following paragraphs applies to each Department's surveillance procedures except as noted.
+ Surveillance Testing, calibrations or inspections will hereafter be referred to as surveillance testing or testing.
OCKOURC NVMBCR RCVIBION NUMBCR AQ NUMBKR 1.5.1 6 1.5.1-1 of 18 83i'i210272 PDR ADOCK 83iiii 05000397 A .PDR
V, 4,g ~ ~
O'I ~
IA. Title and Cover Sheet Attachment II is a typical procedure cover sheet to be used by Operations in performing surveillances. Likewise, Attachments III, IV, V, and VI are cover sheets to be used by IAC, Maintenance, Health Physics/Chemistry and Technical in performing surveillance activities.
The first Comments Section. will be completed by the person perform-ing the test and/or his Foreman, and used to record significant observations made during the performance of the test and any anoma-lies which were observed. In addition, its testing is performed for any reason other than routine surveillance (i.e.,
tested because a redundant system is out of service or if if a system is testing is required prior to entering a subsequent mode of operation), this fact should be noted in the Comment Section. This will assist in audits and reconstruction of surveillance histories. (Each person whose initials are recorded in the procedure section shall sign the cover sheet.)
The second Comments Section is reserved for the'ssigned reviewer as-descr'ibed, in 1.5.1.5.A. This section will describe the overall re-sults of the test and the disposition of the test results including any followup or corrective action which may be necessary. (Since the IhC cover sheet only includes one comment section, all comments will be made in that section and certified at the end to identify the commentator. )
- 8. ~Pur oee The Purpose Section of the surveillance procedure specifically references the Technical Specification surveillance section(s) satisfied by the test and describes the Technical Specification operational condition during which performance of'he test is re-quired. Further elaboration on the intent of the test is optional.
This section should enumerate each individual Technical Specifica-tion surveillance covered by the procedure.
C. Prere uisites This section lists only those 'tasks that are always required to be done or specific conditions that are required to be done prior to performance of the surveillance procedure. Prerequisites for manda-tory conditions are required to have a signature blank for the per-son verifying compliance with the prerequisite.
Some typical prerequisites which should be considered are:
PROCEDURE NUMBER REVISION NUMBKR PAQK NUMBER 1.5.1 1.5.1-2 of 18 W~t ~ Rl It&1)
h ~,
- l. Assure that no other testing is in progress, that in conjunc-tion.with this test, could cause a full scram.
- 2. Establish corwmnications between the testing area and the Con-trol Room when required.
- 3. Prepare an RWP for use, if necessary.
- 0. Limitations and Precautions This section is intended to provide general and specific caution/
guidance statements relative to the procedure context. This should not preclude inclusion of limitations or precautions in the body of the procedure as necessary to avoid risk to plant operation or plant personnel safety at the appropriate procedural step.
E. Materials Tools and Test E ui ment This section lists all materials, tools and temporary test equipment which may be required. The manufacturer's model number, name and range (if appropriate) shall be recorded as well as calibration void date as applicable. (For IhC testing, a blank space is available on the cover sheet to record test equipment data.)
F. Procedure This section is the step by step instructions for performing the surveillance test. Each step requires a blank where either the per-.
former's initials or appropriate data is recorded. Where appli-cable, the Technical Specification parameter values are noted directly below the data blank. The, data blank is labeled with the appropriate parameter units.
Example:
Step 4 - Record pump flow (F1001) gpm Technical Specification 6,350 GFM If applicable, each test procedure should conclude with a system restoration section and sic@ off.
G. Acce tance Criteria To facilitate evaluation of acceptance and sign-off, the specific criterion for each step shall be easily discernible.
Specific criteria not provided by design or licensing documents may be deferred until performance of initial testing to establish the-specific criterion.
ROCKOURK NUMKKR RKVRRON NUMKKR PAOK NUMBKR 1.5.1 1.5.1-3 of 18 W~II R1 (I W)
For those components included in the WNP-2 Pump and Valve Test Program, an acceptance range for component reference data will be established prior to the initial performance of the surveillance test. Upon baseline test completion, actual data falling within the range will become the reference data. Pny initial data which does not fall within this range will be evaluated by the Technical Department before reference data is established or modified for that surveillance procedure per the WNP-2 Pump and Valve Operability Test Program.
H. Documentation file in
'he completed test results shall be stored in the plant accordance with 1.5.1.8.
I. Attachments (Attachments are listed individually. If none, so state.)
1.5.1.4 Test Performance The responsibility for performing surveillance tests will be assigned in the following manner for each Department:
Operations Shift Manager assigns Control Room Supervisor Maintenance (IhC) Supervisor assigns Foreman Maintenance - Supervisor assigns Foreman HP/Chemistry- - Supervisor assigns Foreman Technical Supervisor assigns Staff Engineer Routine surveillances which do not necessitate an individual procedure will be accomplished and documented via shift, daily, weekly or monthly logs as appropriate. These logs will be submitted to POC via procedure for approval prior to implementation. All other Technical Specification surveillances will be performed in accordance with Volume 7 procedures.
During the operation of plant equipment while performing a test, the Control Room Operator assicped to perform the test or support another Department in testing, will dispatch a knowledgeable Operator(s) to the equipment location. The Operator will be responsible for verifying correct operation of the equipment by local observations/adjustments (e.q., verifies proper lubrication and/or cooling flow monitors for unusual noises, etc.).
PROCEDURE NUMBER REVISiON NUMBER PAQK NUMQKR 1.5.1 1.5.1-4 of 18 WP dt ~ R1 (t&Q)
1 I
0 Jl 1 i
For all Departments other than HP/Chemistry, the Shift Manager's approval and signature on the cover sheet will be required immediately prior to test initiation. If, during the performance of a test, it becomes apparent that the test may be interrupted and/or completion of the test may be delayed, the Shift Manager shall be notified.
The test performer should pay particular attention to critical steps and precautions in the procedure which, if performed incorrectly, could scram the plant, result in a group isolation, damage equipment or involve per-sonnel risk. If the step is not clearly understood or is if the procedure believed to be in error, the test performer should seek the assistance of the Shift, Manager. In addition, any test results found to be outside those designated in the procedure or any abnormal circumstances that pre-vent completion 'of the procedure shall be denoted in the "Comments" sec-tion of the cover sheet. Any work request issued as a result of the test shall be referenced in the counts section. Except under certain speci-fic situations, the test procedure should be monitored at the test loca tion.
Upon completion of the testing, the equipment or system should be re-turned to its normal status unless the Shift Manager approves an alter-nate alicpment or arrangement. In this case, a brief description of the final system conditions will be included in the comment section and the Shift Manager will initial thus sicpifying approval.
The need for independent verification of the component/system operability shall be addressed by the Shift Manager prior to his completion signa-ture. For those tests where the return to normal/operable status is specified within the test and requires signature acknowledgement, no further action is required. For other tests, the component/system oper-ability shall be independently verified by test or inspection and the method to document it shall be attached to the procedure.
Prior to forwarding the test'esults for final review and approval, the test performer and the Shift Manager or aporopriate foreman responsible for the testing should verify that ail blanks have been properly com-pleted and that any si~ificant observations made during the test are recorded. In addition, the Shift Manager will perform a review to deter-mine the applicability for a potential reportable occurrence report (PPM 1.10.1) and/or take any action required by the Technical Specifications and complete a NCR per Reference B describing the results. The foreman shall immediately notify his supervisor upon discovering a reportable or potentially reportable occurence.
1.5.1.5 Test Results Review A. Review B The De artment Performino The Test Completed surveillance tests shall be reviewed for completeness and accuracy within each Department as follows:
PROCKDURK NUMSKR 'KVISION NUMSKR tACK NUMSKR 1.5.1 1.5.1-5 of 18 WP 44$ R1 (5&5)
t C 0
Operations Relief Day Shift Manager Maintenance (IhC) IhC Supervisor or alternate Maintenance Supervisor or alternate HP/Chemistry Supervisor or alternate Technical Reactor Engineer Supervisor/Plant Engineering supervisor or alternate This review must be completed during the next work day following the test. The reviewer is responsible for all followup and corrective actions as follows:
- l. If an item has been omitted, he will investigate to determine if it was actually ommitted sic@ed off.
or if it was performed but not
- 2. He will review the test results against acceptance criteria to ficationss.
assure that Technical Specification requirements are met, and, if not, follow the action requirements in the Technical Speci-
- 3. If an item appears to be in error, he will investigate to determine if correct information is available.
- 4. He will determine If so, if the test or a portion of it must be re-peated. he will initiate action and provide specified directions regarding the deficiencies or omissions of the original test.
- 5. He will perform a review to determine the applicability for a potential reportable occurrence report (PPM 1.10.1) and license
.event report (Reference E of PPM 1.10.1).
!'. He will initiate any changes to the procedure which are recom-mended to facilitate testing.
- 7. He will forward the test results to the Records Management along with the completed task card.
B. Technical De artment Review After completion of the test, a copy of the test data will be trans-mitted to the Technical Department Manager. Test results will be reviewed and evaluated against Technical Specifications and trends by Technical Department Staff. In addition, key parameters which are critical to plant availability and safety will be recorded to assist in predicting equipment operating trends. and'valuated PROCKDURK NUMBCR RCVIBION NUMBCR PAGK NUMBCR 1.5.1 1.5.1-6 of 18 WP400 RI (0 N)
I S
0 I ~ 4 I I 4
Based on this review, the Technical Department will recommend and initiate preventive maintenance to reverse any negative trends. An evaluation will be made to determine if the maintenance can be per-formed with the plant on-line or alternately, if it can be delayed until the next scheduled outage. Also, any maintenance performed which could effect equipment performance will be evaluated to deter-mine if retesting or new component reference data is required.
1.5.1.6 ~Re ortin In addition, to preparing a non conformance report, reports to regulatory authorities will be oerformed in accordance with References D and F, Ver-bal Reports to the hRC that are required within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> will be performed by the Duty Shift Manager following consultation with the Plant Manager or desicpated representative. The Technical Department Compliance Engineer will be responsible for preparation'nd submittal of the routine as well as the non-routine written reports required by Technical Specifi-cation Section 6.0. This will include the monthly and annual operating reports, LER's, and the 30 day written reports required for abnormal operating events.
In addition to the normal operating reports the Compliance E'ngineer will prepare the startup reports required following initial plant startup and those following significant plant/fuel cycle modifications that would affect: a) power level, b) nuclear, thermal, or hydraulic performance c) a change in fuel cycle desicp or a different fuel supplier.
1.5.1.7 Procedure Revision Process A. Tem rar Revisions Temporary changes to the Volume 7 Surveillance Procedures are made in accordance with PPM 1.2.3, as a deviation to the existing proce-dure. Such changes are allowed, provided that:
- 1. The intent of the original procedure is not altered.
- 2. The change is approved by two members of the Plant Management Staff, at least one of whom holds a Senior Reactor Operator's License on the unit affected.
The change is documented; reviewed by POC and approved by the Plant Manager within 14 days of implementation.
1.5.1.8 Documentation Stora e and Retention Upon completion of a test, the results will be sent to the WNP-2 Operations File (Service Building). Test results will be filed in accordance with PPM 1.6.4.
PROCKDURK NUMBKR RKVISION NUMBKR PAQK NUMBKR 1.5.1 1.5.1-7 of 18 WP 090 Rl (9&9)
t 4 J ~ 'I 0
f61 surveillance test data will be included on two document guides. All 4111 be retained for the life of the plant on microfilm copy. 'ata Access to the working copy of this file will be unlimited and resident in the Plant Files.'n addition to the surveillance record copy file, Equipment History Files containing vital data on plant equipment will be maintained in the Opera-tions File. Equipment per formanc trending data will be developed from surveillance test data and maintained by the Plant Technical Department.
(It should be noted that this equipment, performance file is a working file for the convenience of the plant staff and is not intended to serve as a second source for the surveillance test record copy.)
1.5.1.9 Surveillance Test Schedulin (See the Surveillance Testing Flow Chart included as Attachment 1)
A. Schedule Maintenance S stem (SMS)
A master schedule for surveillance testing required at a frequency greater than daily, will be prepared to cover a five year period by the Testing Coordinator. This schedule will be incorporated into the Scheduled Maintenance System (SMS). On a monthly basis, the Maintenance Planner and Scheduler will furnish each Department Man-ager with a schedule and the SMS cards of surveillance tests which must be performed in the next month. On a periodic basis, the Main-.
tenance Planner and Scheduler will provide each Department Manager with a backlog report (report of those tests which have not been documented complete) and a violation report (report of those tests which have exceeded their late date).
B. Data In ut to SMS Each Department Manager will be responsible for inputting surveil-lance procedure data to &IS in accordance with PPM 10.1.5, upon POC approval of the test procedure. Attachment VII is a copy of a sample task card similar to those which will'e issued on a monthly basis. In addition, to the surveillance task card, each Department Manager can receive a surveillance schedule report for all depart-mental tests required during the period. This report is available from the Maintenance Planner and Scheduler upon request.
Since SMS was originally developed to provide information input for individual pieces of equipment, the input for surveillance tests must be tailored to meet the computer code requirements. As a re-sult, certain fields may not be applicable and will either be left blank or marked N/A. An example of this is the equipment informa-tion which does not appear in Attachment VII since the test covers a multitude of plant equipment.
PROCKDURK NUMBKR RKVISION NUMBKR PAGK NUMBKR 1.5.1 1.5.1-8 of 18 WP $ 0$ RI (%<ST
V e '- ~ *1 ~ + 'sr 0
J
As applicable, surveillance testing'ill be performed on a "fixed anniversary" basis.. Thus the test due date will be provided along with a late date calculated by computer which takes previous test completion dates into account.. Although a grace period of 25K of the test frequency is allowed (except for certain isolated cases-especially 4.6.1.2.L and 4.6.1.3.b.l), any 3 consecutive tests must be performed within 3.25 times the test frequency. Failure to meet these requirements will result in a Technical Specification viola-tion. Actual test frequency will be based on Technical Specifica-tion requirements and listed in SMS and the Surveillance Listing (1.5.1.9.G).
In order to avoid violations, each department will perform testing
. on the due date, thus saving the margin for unforeseen ciz>umstances or for special test scheduling which may be necessary to mqintain a high plant availability. As previously mentioned, a daily backlog
~
report will be issued to each Department Manager as indication of any testing which has not been reported as completed by return of the surveillance task card.
C. Initial Test Schedulin Prior to plant startup, the Testing Coordinator will develop a master schedule for surveillance testing in conjunction with each department. This schedule will attempt to schedule tests in a logi-cal order over the given periods. By utilizing a fixed anniversary scheduling system, the testing sequence should remain the same thoughout plant life'. This schedule'will be refined as conditions change and operating experience is acquired.
- 0. Test Com letion Notification Upon completion of a test, each department must review and approve the test results in accordance with 1.5.1.5 and submit these results to the plant file for storage. The surveillance task cardIwill not be returned to the Maintenance Planner and Scheduler until the docu-mentation has been placed in the plant files. Any special results or conditions following the test shall be noted on the card in the remarks column. If QC notification to witness the test (denoted by QC prior to task card distribution) is not received, the QC/Test Section should be marked N/A.
Equi ment Maintenance and Retest If equipment maintenance and/or retesting are required as a result of the initial test results, &IS will not be used. Each Department Manager. is responsible for scheduling any retesting that may be re-quired. SMS will continue to carry testing based on the fixed anni-versary date.
PROCKOURK NUMSKR RKVI5ION NUMSKR PAOK NUMSKR 1.5.1 1.5.1-9 of 18 WP illRI (li$5)
4 I R
F.
The SMS System will be used to identify any plant testing which can be performed during planned or unplanned outages..The Testing Coor-dinator will request an SMS report by department, by operating mode (i.e.; refueling) and a listing of'hose tests which can only be performed while the plant is shutdown will be provided to each Department Manager.
G. Surveillance Listin In addition to the monthly distribution of task cards and listing of surveillances, a cross reference index containing all Technical Specification surveillances, procedure numbers, responsible depart-ments, operating mode under which the test can be run and frequency of testing will be available. This listing will be maintained in the computer and has the capability to sort on any column heading.
Thus an immediate method of identifying by procedure how each sur-veillance is performed is available from the Testing Coordinator.
H. Procedure Numberin A procedure numbering system utilizing the Technical Specification surveillance numbers with the prefix 7 in front will be utilized.
For inputting into SMS, the procedure for TS 4.5.1 would be TSS-PN-7.4.5.1 with TSS-PN sicpifying Technical Specification Sur-veillance Procedure Number. For those procedures which cover more than one surveillance requirement, the procedure should be numbered after the most predominant surveillance requirement included and all other applicable procedures included in the task description (see Attachment VII). The Testing Coordinator will provide assistance in procedure numbering.
1.5.1.10 Technical Direction The Technical Department will provide technical direction for interpret-ing surveillance requirements, testing methods or plans and test schedul-ing upon request.
1.5.1.11 Re ferences-A. FPM 1.2.3, Use of Plant Procedures B. PPM 1.3.12, Plant Non Conformances C. FPM 1.6.4, Operations Files'ontents and Structure D. PPM 1.10.1, Reportable Events and Occurrences, Required by Regulatory Agencies PROCEOURE NUMBER RKVIBION NUMBER PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1 1.5.1-10 of 18 WP 999 Rl (9.90)
K. FPM 1.10.2, Routine or Periodic Reports Required By Regulatory Agencies F.~ PPM 10.1.5,'cheduled Maintenance System 1.5.1.12
~ ~ ~ Attachments A. Attachment 1, Surveillance Testing Flow Chart B. Attachment II - VI, Testing Procedure Cover Sheets for Operations, Maintenance (IhC), Maintenance, Health Physics/Chemistry, and Tech-nical C. Attachment YII, Surveillance Task Card (sample)
PRDCKDURK NUMSKR RKVISIQN NUMBKR PAQK NUMSKR 1.5.1 1.5.1-11 of 18 WP 454 RI (0 45)
I 1 C II L ~ I &~ v%- P ' I ~ ~ I ~ yP 4+
0
"I.i fc"I ISO) fplflflcflfs 10 )III"llsS Ptln jl<ctgfd ntl +N tc IV)tll hi I) h) P,lhn U",I ) P.'Ilhfd
~ PIS Cl<f)
IINI)cll ficg<
)IS od0 nl fcvfO)sn 0<II h))9
'<CW) Hljttf fhOPASIOI n<t) n) l<SIO 0 I)p)Anscl itlf Plh< 5)PPSOJ 'Ill"Pn)ff nq ll)f 0 ccstt)<sooslt
\Ah) n.'llf<OJtf ol s)ncdhs nshd U) QJI 0 ostdn1d ns pint<OS -hnf sntuffng ostt<ssltsg of<10)sodttf -sad<a 0<1)
I tlt)5 5psosc)L WIRUdtk rf S))F)psl)tld ~ clls<fosd (5 0'I ~ ) P<5 O
)sod~ nsf sot/~ 0+)0
<IIIf Ilsn)
-SPI I<te<IPga0 nC< c<tl1 h I I PK IOSI SOJSdOJd s)tnnws pb g ~o I <st)doxltv<
5 pros
~1
-old Iee 0)IP $ 00)A Wf I
0<11 <I) S))<PS p SPol pit< Otf CN)W S) I<offoj ~J fiv0 Iht) vf s)fnt
-os Jshcnept su 1 0 pl I cps Itt<o) th<L~
Puss) 5 IP<$ 01 Olf) 00)AOII Ivho) Jhd:CJ PUO
) 50) SOO<t)f Spshohtf
- 0) PJ00 c)$ 0)
)EWE LA<0 JOOSucffJ )
tn)aloof )<MS 50
~A 5 PPCOJ
'5)00) )oo Pc<et )$ 0)
Sothf 10d M 1<lulls I i ou) t~lelol Pvf)50) g 55 51 X
CA P
~
p0)0)dtno )0<0 Jhnsof $ )50) I)I)$$ 0 SIO)5$ 0 JR~<<If )
JPJJ<t)IOJ fcof<tfsoL ~t t)l 0~tots 1~050) 5 Josfuai~/ u>> stcL tp~e
$ 0 p )0 \dnootf
- 5) ff<501f C
)5 6
E IPP 'P sp<0001)lbhs Os<<0) f)SAC<IS Apt)tsso Opf<0<SIS ffv)150)
Scp) Avid not<0)f)OAsnt I )0 K 1 0 Pf<h<)SS JOAO ckff Sdcl)OAISI Pit< Jhtt<0)d ~so wff<sooPI Ou()s Js OBLI<<0)U fC)f X z
lhll)~m)lt c) f R I <PI ) I0 1 ) 5 ) 0
<< Icf'V It<Id JOPVIPJotQ 05 Oil) st 5< h$<l n) tfpllIO OU))$ 0)
Jhf pleo) vtcf:5< rtlfhn) ) of N6 P ftss JO(hfih<PS v~1'I'i'"'l hPIm) P)10 0<1) Jhf ) Jtcd I snfc<C) Pl Jolt 0') d 5< Pin<1 lit .5< 501)) IPlls o<1) n) hnf<00 01 Of<5<. Isss <PS<< JOJ lO<tct<0)u) Ctf UPllln <0Ãlcnl f<llf1$01
-ntd It<pntclfc hll) fn
)$ 0)n)
<cctvs 0 SCSI)Avid
~<>P%"of<S JO< ~ Ihfd
) tttlhtf Onf Ifthg St)I<p stpf %lsd J 0 II PÃ f<S flin Jottti)PI f0<)co&lpfof oosDvsd
't<wf)PIAJUS ssts
- 0) 5)ttluf JOPS<tts<S Pit< Jttl<0)d
'<I) ol 0)hP Ice)of SII; SISI) Nlsd r
- wa of
)Oh<Is<Sin )4-Inc) )tstcfhsd 0 vi)<0;cnsd 5<O) tsn It<<IS) I)<<*OK 5<Sf)$ $U Ittl POI I II<05<I Jtl)IUOuvcvl
<KI I 3 Os'SV) t)y ctn<ottcj U I Off 00<AP<OI)UJC)f f 4ONWO~U tt( )U~i>> Jttt<tf !
IIIC<IO St<tv )St)IS)f mISrn)A<fr, K
g r IA
~
ff I)
Sf ts 0
ts
C 4
E 0
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM PLANT PROCEDURES MANUAL WNP- 2 PROCCOURC NUMQCR APPROVCD OATC
+]'5 ]
OI UMC NAMC 1 SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES (Operations)
N 1.5 (SECTION TITLE)
+1.5.1 PROCEDURE TITLE Permission. to Perform Test: Time Date Shift Manager Test Performed B : Test Satisfactor I I Yes I I No NCR Issued . I I Yes I I No Test Com leted and Reviewed:
Control Room Operator Date Shift Manager Work Request Issued I I Yes I No Number Comments:
Assigned Reviewer Date Relief Day Shift Manager Comments:
Requirement for which Test Perfor'med:
Tech Spec Weekly, I I Monthly I Quarterly I I Annually I I Increased Frequency I I Post Maintenance +I I 18 Mo I I Attachment II - Testing Procedure Cover Sheet Operations CCOURC NUMIICR RCVISION NUMBCR Paa NUMaCR 1.5.1 1.5.1-13 of 18 WM$1 RR It+1)
4 I~
0
WASHINGTON PUBLlC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM PLANT PROCEDURES MANUAL
%NP.- 2 PROCKDURC NUMBCR APPROV CD OATK
+1.5.1 OL MC NAMC SURVE ILLANCE PROCEDURES N
1.5 SECTION T T Channel Calibration/Functional Test Procedure For:
E. P. NNBER ACCURACY SETPOINT ALLOWABLE VALUE MANUFACTURER MODEL Permission To Perform Test Shift Manager Test Performed By Date Test Satisfactory i 1 Yes I I No Signoff NCR Issued l I Yes I I No Procedure Completed Date Time Shift-Manager Test E ui -. Nos Cal. Void Date Foreman Date Reviewed By Date Comment:
Re uirement for which Test Performed:
Tech Spec Weekly I I Monthly I l Quarterly I I Annually l I Increased Frequency I I Post Maintenance I I 18 Mo I I Attachment III - Testing Procedure Cover Sheet - Maintenance (IAC) tQCKDURC NUMBKR RKVISlQN NUMBKR O NUMBKR 1.5.1 WP 507 RK ($ 45)
V I I h'
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM PLANT PROCEDURES MANUAL WNP- 2 PROCCDURK NUMBCR APPROVCD DATK
+l.5.1 OLUMC NAMC SURVE ILLANCE PROCEDURES (Maintenance) 1.5 (SECTION TITLE)
+1. 5.1 PROCEDURE TITLE Permission To Perform Test Time Date Shift Manager Test Performed By: Date Results Satisfactory I I Ye's I I No Signoff NCR Issued I I Yes I No Test Completed Shift Manager Comments:
Work Request Issued I I Yes I I No Number Assi cped Reviewer Date Comnents:
Re uirements for which Test Performed:
Tech Spec Weekly I I Monthly I I Quarterly I I Annually I I Increased Frequency I I Post Maintenance +I I 18 Mo I I Attachment IV - Testing Procedure Cover Sheet Maintenance CCOURK NUMBCR RCV15lON NUMBCR PAO NUMBCR 1.5.1 1.5.1-15 of 18 WP4$ 7 RC ($ 40)
'C ft III R C v
V/ASHINGTQNPUBLIC POSER SUPPLY SYSTEM PLANT PROCEDURES MANUAL
%NP- 2 PROCKOURK NUMBCR APPROVKO OATC
+1.5.1 OL MC NAMC SURVE ILLANCE PROCEDURES (HP/Chemistry)
C N 1.5 (SECTION TITLE)
II1.5.1 FROCEDURE TITLE Permission To Perform Test Shift Manager Test Performed By: Date Results Satisfactory I I Yes I I- No Signoff NCR Issyed -
I I Yes I I No Test Completed Shift Manager Comments:
Work Request Issued I I Yes I No Number Assi cped Reviewer Date Comments:
Re uirement for which Test Performed:
Tech Spec Weekly I I Monthly I I Quarterly I I Annually I I Increased Frequency I I Post Maintenance +I I 18 Mo I I Attachment V Testing Procedure Cover Sheet - HP/Chemistry QCKOURC NUMBCR RKVIBION NUMBCR AO N MB R 1.5.1 6 1.5.1-16 of 18 W~IT RX (SWQ)
WASHINGTONPUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM PLANT PROCEDURES MANUAL V5P-2 PROCCOURK NUMBKR APPROV KD OATC
+l.5.1 OLUMC NAMC SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES (Technical )
N 1.5 SECTION TITLE Permission To Perform Test Time Date Shift Manager Test Performed By: Date Results Satisfactory I I Yes I I No Signoff NCR Issued I I Yes I I No Test Completed Shift Manager Comments:
Work Request Issued I I Yes I I No Number Assi eyed Reviewer Date Comments:
Re uirement for which Test Performed:
Tech Spec Weekly I I Monthly I I Quarterly I I Annually I I Increased Frequency I I Post Maintenance +I I 18 Mo I I Attachment VI Testing Procedure Cover Sheet Technical OcKOuRK NUMBCR RKVI5ION NUMBKR AO NUMBKR 1.5.1 1.5.1-17 of 18 WP.557 R2 (5<2)
C I ~ \
SURVEILLANCE TASK CARO
,4 (Sample) 1/13/83 1,
SURVEILLANCE OUE: ~ PMID: AA3772, 2-TSS-PN-7. ~ 4.5.1.B.l
~ ~ ~ TASK ID:Ol LATE: 2/ 5/83 TRANS: 6 PLANT CONDITION: ~ POWER OPERATIONS 123456780 PRTY: PRNT: 12/15/82 LOC: ~ QCLASS: FREG:92~ DAY FA CLR/REQ: ~ YES EQUIFMENT DESC:
TASK DESC: ECCS OIV 1 OPERABILITY TEST, INCLUDING TS 4.5.1.B.2, (INCLUDE ALL TECH SPEC SURVEILLANCE CONVEREO BY THIS PROCEDURE AND ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION.)
PROC/REF: 0 R'HP REQ: YES TECH SPEC: YES SYS: EQUIP: N/A FUNCTIONAL TEST SERIAL:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (MFG REF: ).......(REL/CRAFT: , , )..........
QC/TEST: COMPLETION DATE: . / / OPERATIONS SS APVL: RESCHEDULE DATE: / / HOLRS:
EMP h SUPR SIG: CLR/NO:
NO'EMARKS:
I Attachment VII PROCKOURK NUMCCR RCVICION NUMSCR PAOK NUMSCR 1.5.1 1.5.1-18 of 18 WP O'IC R1 IS&3)
q