ML17332A605: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 02/28/1995
| issue date = 02/28/1995
| title = Forwards Proposed Ts,Revising Train A/B Battery Profiles & Modifying Train N Batteries Profile Request for Mod
| title = Forwards Proposed Ts,Revising Train A/B Battery Profiles & Modifying Train N Batteries Profile Request for Mod
| author name = FITZPATRICK E
| author name = Fitzpatrick E
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:P.RIQRITY 1(ACCELERATED RIDSPROCESSING REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM(RIDS)DOCKET0500031505000316P
{{#Wiki_filter:P.RIQRITY (ACCELERATED RIDS PROCESSING 1
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9503080168                  DOC.DATE: 95/02/28          NOTARIZED: YES        DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M                          05000315 50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana M                        05000316 AUTH. NAME              AUTHOR AFFILIATION FITZPATRICK,E.          Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana 6 Michigan Ele                  P RECIP.NAME              RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
ForwardsproposedTS,revising trainA/Bbatteryprofiles6modifying trainNbatteries profilerequestformod.DISTRIBUTION CODE:A001DCOPIESRECEIVED:
Forwards proposed TS,revising train A/B battery profiles 6 modifying train N batteries profile request for mod.
LTRJENCLlSIZE:k~TITLE:ORSubmittal:
DISTRIBUTION CODE: A001D TITLE: OR COPIES RECEIVED: LTR Submittal: General Distribution J  ENCL l  SIZE:   k~
GeneralDistribution ACCESSION NBR:9503080168 DOC.DATE:
NOTES                                                                                                R RECIPIENT                  COPIES                RECIPIENT          COPIES ID  CODE/NAME               LTTR ENCL          ID  CODE/NAME       LTTR ENCL PD3-1 LA                          1      1        PD3-1 PD              1      1 HICKMAN,J                         1      1 INTERNAL:   IL'E 'CENTER      01          1      1        NRR/DRCH/HICB          1      1
95/02/28NOTARIZED:
      ~NRR/DSSA~SPLB                       1      1        NRR/DSSA/SRXB         1      1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT                  1      1        OGC/HDS2              1    . 0 EXTERNAL: NOAC                              1      1        NRC PDR                1      1 D
YESFACIL:50-315 DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,IndianaM50-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,IndianaMAUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION FITZPATRICK,E.
0 C
IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly Indiana6MichiganEleRECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk)NOTESRECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LAHICKMAN,J INTERNAL:
U N
IL'E'CENTER01~NRR/DSSA~SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT EXTERNAL:
NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
NOACCOPIESLTTRENCL111111111111RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1PDNRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DSSA/SRXB OGC/HDS2NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL1111111.011RD0CUNNOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE KVASTE! CONTACI THE DOCUiIENTCO4"I ROL DESK, ROOI1I PI-37 (EXT. 504-2083 ) TO EL!ihIINATE YOUR NAi!E FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS I'OR DOCL'MEN'I'S YOU DON"I'EED!
PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEKVASTE!CONTACITHEDOCUiIENTCO4"I ROLDESK,ROOI1IPI-37(EXT.504-2083)TOEL!ihIINATEYOURNAi!EFROMDISTRIBUTION LISTSI'ORDOCL'MEN'I'S YOUDON"I'EED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR                      11  ENCL    10
TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
 
LTTR11ENCL10 I
I indiana Michigan t            'ower Company
t/.~I'e~\'indianaMichigan'owerCompanyP.O.Box16631Columbus, OH43216February28,1995ENtMANANSCHESJEN PQ5ÃMAEP'NRC'0896U DocketNos.:50-31550-316U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission ATTN:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Gentlemen:
/. \
DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGEREQUEST;REVISETHETRAINA/BBATTERYPROFILESANDMODIFYTRAINNBATTERIES'ROFILE REQUESTFORMODIFICATION
  ~
\ThepurposeofthisletteristomodifyourAEP:NRC:0896S letter,samesubject,datedJuly19,1994,asrequested bytheNRRstaff.InaJanuary13,1995,telephone conference theNRRreviewing.
      ~ I'e P.O. Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 ENtMANA NSCHESJEN PQ5ÃM February 28, 1995                                          AEP'NRC'0896U Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:
engineerrequested thatweadoptthelanguageofthelatestrevisiontoIEEEStandard450withregardtothemodifiedperformance testanddegradedperformance testrecommendations.
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and  2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST; REVISE THE TRAIN A/B BATTERY PROFILES AND MODIFY TRAIN N BATTERIES'ROFILE REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION
Tosatisfyhisrequest,paragraph "e"onpages3/48-14and3/48-18fortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2technical specifications respectively shouldreadasfollows."Atleastonceper60months,conductaperformance testofbatterycapacityduringshutdown(MODES5or6),byverifying
                                                                                  \
.thatthebatterycapacityisatleast80%ofthemanufacturer's rating.Whenthistestisperformed inplaceofabatteryservicetest,amodifiedperformance testshallbeconducted.
The purpose        of this letter is to modify our AEP:NRC:0896S letter, same    subject, dated July 19, 1994, as requested by the NRR staff.
Annualperformance testsofbatterycapacityshallbegiventoanybatterythatshowssigns ofdegradation orhasreached85%oftheservicelifeexpectedfortheapplication.
In    a  January 13, 1995, telephone conference the NRR reviewing.
Degradation isindicated whenthebatterycapacitydropsmorethan10%fromitscapacityonthepreviousperformance test,oris-below90%ofthemanufacturer's rating.Ifthebatteryhasreached85%ofservicelife,deliversa capacityof100%orgreaterofthemanufacturer's ratedcapacity, andhasshownnosignsofdegradation, performance testingattwoyearintervals isacceptable untilthebatteryshowssignsofdegradation."
engineer        requested  that we adopt the language of the latest revision to          IEEE  Standard 450 with regard to the modified performance test and degraded performance test recommendations. To satisfy his request, paragraph "e" on pages 3/4 8-14 and 3/4 8-18 for the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 technical specifications respectively should read as follows.
070OSS.9503080168 950228PDRADOCK05000315PPDR
                              "At least once per 60 months, conduct a performance test of battery capacity during shutdown (MODES 5 or 6), by verifying
.~0 U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Page2AEP:NRC:0896U Thebatterysurveillance requirements havebeenmodifiedtoreflectthecommentsasrequested.
                              .that the battery capacity is at least 80% of the manufacturer's rating. When this test is performed in place of a battery service test, a modified performance test shall be conducted.
Foryourconvenience, acopyoftheexistingT/Ss,markedtoreflectallthechanges,isincludedasAttachment 1~Attachment 2isatypedcopyoftheT/Ss,astheyshouldappear,withbarmarginsindicating thechanges.Pleasenotethenewformatweareimplementing toallowelectronic accesstotheT/Ss.Withthenewformattherearepagination changesandminoradministrative changestoTable4.8-2inbothunitsinanongoingefforttoachieveuniformity betweentheunits.Wehavereviewedthestaff'srequested changesandbelievethesignificant hazardsconsideration performed pursuantto10CFR50.92fortheoriginalsubmittal isvalid.Therefore, wehavenotprovidedfurtherjustification forthechangesrequested bytheNRRstaff.Webelievetheproposedadditional changeswillnotresultin(1)asignificant changeinthetypesofeffluentorasignificant increaseintheamountofanyeffluentthatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposure.
Annual performance tests of battery capacity shall be given to any battery that showssigns of degradation or has reached 85% of the service        life expected for the application.
TheseproposedT/SchangeshavebeenreviewedandapprovedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee andwillbeapprovedbytheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee atthenextregularly scheduled meeting.Incompliance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91(b)(l),
Degradation is indicated when the battery capacity drops more than 10% from its capacity on the previous performance test, or is-below 90% of the manufacturer's rating. If  the battery has reached 85% of service life, deliversa capacity of 100%
copiesofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted toMr.J.R.PadgettoftheMichiganPublicServiceCommission andtheMichiganDepartment ofPublicHealth.Sincerely, E'gpWE.E.FitpatrickVicePresident ehSWORNTOANDSUBSCRIBED BEFOREMETHIS~PDAYOF~~c1995Attachment cc:A.A.BlindG.CharnoffJ.B.MartinNFEMSectionChiefNRCResidentInspector
or greater of the manufacturer's rated capacity, and has shown no signs of degradation, performance testing at two year intervals is acceptable until the battery shows signs of degradation."
-BridgmanJ.R.PadgettNoryPublic 0/ŽJ}}
070OSS.
9503080168 950228 PDR  ADOCK 05000315 P                    PDR
 
. ~ 0 U. S. Nuclear    Regulatory Commission                     AEP:NRC:0896U Page 2 The  battery surveillance requirements have been modified to reflect the comments as requested.         For your convenience, a copy of the existing T/Ss, marked to reflect all the changes, is included as    ~ Attachment 2 is a typed copy of the T/Ss, as they should appear, with bar margins indicating the changes.             Please note the new format we are implementing to allow electronic access to the T/Ss. With the new format there are pagination changes and minor administrative changes to Table 4.8-2 in both units in an ongoing effort to achieve uniformity between the units.
We  have reviewed the    staff's  requested  changes  and  believe the significant hazards consideration performed pursuant to 10 CFR 50.92 for the original submittal is valid. Therefore, we have not provided further justification for the changes requested by the NRR staff.
We  believe the proposed additional changes      will not result in (1) a  significant change in the types of effluent or a significant increase in the amount of any effluent that may be released offsite, or (2) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
These proposed T/S changes have been reviewed and approved by the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee and will be approved by the Nuclear Safety and Design Review Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting.
In compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.91(b)(l), copies of this letter and its attachments have been transmitted to Mr. J. R. Padgett of the Michigan Public Service Commission and the Michigan Department of Public Health.
Sincerely, E'g          pW E. E. Fit patrick                    SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME Vice President THIS ~P  DAY OF  ~~c      1995 eh Attachment                                      No  ry Public cc:     A. A. Blind G. Charnoff J. B. Martin NFEM Section  Chief NRC Resident  Inspector - Bridgman J. R. Padgett
 
0
  /
J}}

Latest revision as of 01:22, 4 February 2020

Forwards Proposed Ts,Revising Train A/B Battery Profiles & Modifying Train N Batteries Profile Request for Mod
ML17332A605
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 02/28/1995
From: Fitzpatrick E
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML17332A606 List:
References
AEP:NRC:0896U, AEP:NRC:896U, NUDOCS 9503080168
Download: ML17332A605 (6)


Text

P.RIQRITY (ACCELERATED RIDS PROCESSING 1

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9503080168 DOC.DATE: 95/02/28 NOTARIZED: YES DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M 05000315 50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana M 05000316 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION FITZPATRICK,E. Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana 6 Michigan Ele P RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Forwards proposed TS,revising train A/B battery profiles 6 modifying train N batteries profile request for mod.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: A001D TITLE: OR COPIES RECEIVED: LTR Submittal: General Distribution J ENCL l SIZE: k~

NOTES R RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD3-1 LA 1 1 PD3-1 PD 1 1 HICKMAN,J 1 1 INTERNAL: IL'E 'CENTER 01 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HICB 1 1

~NRR/DSSA~SPLB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SRXB 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 OGC/HDS2 1 . 0 EXTERNAL: NOAC 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 D

0 C

U N

NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE KVASTE! CONTACI THE DOCUiIENTCO4"I ROL DESK, ROOI1I PI-37 (EXT. 504-2083 ) TO EL!ihIINATE YOUR NAi!E FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS I'OR DOCL'MEN'I'S YOU DON"I'EED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 11 ENCL 10

I indiana Michigan t 'ower Company

/. \

~

~ I'e P.O. Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 ENtMANA NSCHESJEN PQ5ÃM February 28, 1995 AEP'NRC'0896U Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST; REVISE THE TRAIN A/B BATTERY PROFILES AND MODIFY TRAIN N BATTERIES'ROFILE REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION

\

The purpose of this letter is to modify our AEP:NRC:0896S letter, same subject, dated July 19, 1994, as requested by the NRR staff.

In a January 13, 1995, telephone conference the NRR reviewing.

engineer requested that we adopt the language of the latest revision to IEEE Standard 450 with regard to the modified performance test and degraded performance test recommendations. To satisfy his request, paragraph "e" on pages 3/4 8-14 and 3/4 8-18 for the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 technical specifications respectively should read as follows.

"At least once per 60 months, conduct a performance test of battery capacity during shutdown (MODES 5 or 6), by verifying

.that the battery capacity is at least 80% of the manufacturer's rating. When this test is performed in place of a battery service test, a modified performance test shall be conducted.

Annual performance tests of battery capacity shall be given to any battery that showssigns of degradation or has reached 85% of the service life expected for the application.

Degradation is indicated when the battery capacity drops more than 10% from its capacity on the previous performance test, or is-below 90% of the manufacturer's rating. If the battery has reached 85% of service life, deliversa capacity of 100%

or greater of the manufacturer's rated capacity, and has shown no signs of degradation, performance testing at two year intervals is acceptable until the battery shows signs of degradation."

070OSS.

9503080168 950228 PDR ADOCK 05000315 P PDR

. ~ 0 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AEP:NRC:0896U Page 2 The battery surveillance requirements have been modified to reflect the comments as requested. For your convenience, a copy of the existing T/Ss, marked to reflect all the changes, is included as ~ Attachment 2 is a typed copy of the T/Ss, as they should appear, with bar margins indicating the changes. Please note the new format we are implementing to allow electronic access to the T/Ss. With the new format there are pagination changes and minor administrative changes to Table 4.8-2 in both units in an ongoing effort to achieve uniformity between the units.

We have reviewed the staff's requested changes and believe the significant hazards consideration performed pursuant to 10 CFR 50.92 for the original submittal is valid. Therefore, we have not provided further justification for the changes requested by the NRR staff.

We believe the proposed additional changes will not result in (1) a significant change in the types of effluent or a significant increase in the amount of any effluent that may be released offsite, or (2) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.

These proposed T/S changes have been reviewed and approved by the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee and will be approved by the Nuclear Safety and Design Review Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting.

In compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.91(b)(l), copies of this letter and its attachments have been transmitted to Mr. J. R. Padgett of the Michigan Public Service Commission and the Michigan Department of Public Health.

Sincerely, E'g pW E. E. Fit patrick SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME Vice President THIS ~P DAY OF ~~c 1995 eh Attachment No ry Public cc: A. A. Blind G. Charnoff J. B. Martin NFEM Section Chief NRC Resident Inspector - Bridgman J. R. Padgett

0

/

J