ML18044A094: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 12/14/2017
| issue date = 12/14/2017
| title = 2017 Byron Station Initial License Examination Form ES-301-4
| title = 2017 Byron Station Initial License Examination Form ES-301-4
| author name = Seymour J L, Bielby M E
| author name = Seymour J, Bielby M
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000454, 05000455
| docket = 05000454, 05000455
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person = Seymour J L
| contact person = Seymour J
| document report number = 50-454/OL-17, 50-455/OL-17
| document report number = 50-454/OL-17, 50-455/OL-17
| package number = ML17152A386
| package number = ML17152A386
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES,30lSimulator Scenario Qualitv Checklist Form ES-301-4Test No.: ?olDate of Exam:ScenarioNumbers:
{{#Wiki_filter:ES,30l                                        Simulator Scenario Qua litv Checklist                               Form ES-301-4 Date of Exam:               ScenarioNumbers:     I l2l      I                Test No.: ?ol I
I l2lIIQUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES lnitialsab*coThe initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service,but it does not cue the operators into expected events./7tvlftqq2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.u1Atlr¿3. Each event description consists of the following o the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
lnitials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a      b*       co The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.                                                     /7 tvl ftqq
. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crewo the expected operator actions (by shift position)
: 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.                                                             u1 A tlr¿
. the event termination point (if applicable) w4tø4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
: 3. Each event description consists of the following o     the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated o
r//14ttd"5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain completeevaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
the the the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew expected operator actions (by shift position) w4              tø
røt1[p,6. lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
      .     the event termination point (if applicable)
Operators have suffcient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints Cues are given.N4ftcr7. The simulator modeling is not altered.fict11'lc¿8. The scenarios have been validated.
: 4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.                                             r//     14      ttd"
Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d),
: 5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
rø       t1     [p,
hltnilrØ9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301tl.ult1il,ffi10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit theform along with the simulator scenarios).
: 6. lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
wl/4tPr11The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors.  
N 4 Operators have suffcient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints Cues are given.                                                                                                               ftcr
(Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
: 7. The simulator modeling is not altered.                                                                       fict  11        'lc¿
l,lbl4rlçø12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
: 8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
f\øil11iltâl13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, whenpossible.
hlt  n        ilrØ
txn'4{r,14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
: 9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301                          tl.ul  t1 il,ffi
till4llpûTarget Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d)Actual Attributes
: 10. All individual   operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
: 1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)3t2tt/znlpttutlø2. Abnormal events (2-4)Ll t 3 t 2lLlhIbilnAlld%3. Major transients (l-2)t t tttllr1/,tlm4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)2tt tttlltallril/t25Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions 1 per scenarioset)^,I,ttIil\bl4ûp6. Preidentifed critical tasks (¿ 2)2t2.tzl2iltvlnl(çrz. The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRO-developed tests.# An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required}}
wl /4          tPr The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable 11 rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)                   l,lbl  4        rlçø
: 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified       f\øil 11 on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).                                                             iltâl
: 13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible.
tx    n      '4{r,
: 14. The level     of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.             till  4        llpû Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d)                       Actual Attributes
: 1.         Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)                                                       3t2tt/z      nlpt tu        tlø
: 2.         Abnormal events (2-4)                                                                   Ll t 3 t 2lLl hIbil  nA      lld%
: 3.         Major transients   (l-2)                                                                 t t tttll    r1 /,         tlm
: 4.         EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)                                         2tt tttl      ltal    lr    il/t2 5          Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions set) 1 per scenario
                                                                                                    ^,I,ttI        il\bl    4      ûp
: 6.         Preidentifed critical tasks (¿ 2)                                                       2t2.tzl2 iltvl          n      l(çrz
. The facility licensee signature is not applicable     for NRO-developed tests.
#   An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required}}

Latest revision as of 14:49, 3 February 2020

2017 Byron Station Initial License Examination Form ES-301-4
ML18044A094
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/14/2017
From: Jesse Seymour, Bielby M
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Seymour J
Shared Package
ML17152A386 List:
References
50-454/OL-17, 50-455/OL-17
Download: ML18044A094 (1)
v • d • e


Text

ES,30l Simulator Scenario Qua litv Checklist Form ES-301-4 Date of Exam: ScenarioNumbers: I l2l I Test No.: ?ol I

lnitials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* co The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. /7 tvl ftqq

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. u1 A tlr¿
3. Each event description consists of the following o the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated o

the the the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew expected operator actions (by shift position) w4 tø

. the event termination point (if applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. r// 14 ttd"
5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

rø t1 [p,

6. lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

N 4 Operators have suffcient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints Cues are given. ftcr

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. fict 11 'lc¿
8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

hlt n ilrØ

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301 tl.ul t1 il,ffi
10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

wl /4 tPr The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable 11 rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) l,lbl 4 rlçø

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified f\øil 11 on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). iltâl
13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible.

tx n '4{r,

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. till 4 llpû Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes
1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 3t2tt/z nlpt tu tlø
2. Abnormal events (2-4) Ll t 3 t 2lLl hIbil nA lld%
3. Major transients (l-2) t t tttll r1 /, tlm
4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2tt tttl ltal lr il/t2 5 Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions set) 1 per scenario

^,I,ttI il\bl 4 ûp

6. Preidentifed critical tasks (¿ 2) 2t2.tzl2 iltvl n l(çrz

. The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRO-developed tests.

  1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18044A094&oldid=2416715"