ML19283B617: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 30: Line 30:
Texas A&M University                                        oV''Jys        /d/
Texas A&M University                                        oV''Jys        /d/
College Station, Texas 77840                          b          ,,        ,
College Station, Texas 77840                          b          ,,        ,
                                                                                                          ,
                                                                                                              ,
                                                                               .      ce s i . a      -
                                                                               .      ce s i . a      -
                                                  ,
Lester Kornblith, Jr.
Lester Kornblith, Jr.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                        -
      '
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                        -
Washington, D.C. 20555 Re:  ,
Washington, D.C. 20555 Re:  ,
Offshore Power Systems, Dkt. No. STN 50-437 Gentlemen:
Offshore Power Systems, Dkt. No. STN 50-437 Gentlemen:
  '
In its letter of January 26, 1979, Applicant asserts it need not serve copies of correspondence to the Staff' which are not relevant to the proceeding.              It specifically defends, on the basis of lack of relevance, the failure to serve a copy of a letter sent to the applicant by.the Administrator of EPA and subsequently sent to the Staff by the applicant (which letter was deemed sufficiently relevant that both the Staff and Applicant attached it to brief.s filed with the ASLAB) and the failure to serve a copy of a letter describing its schedule for-responding to    ~
In its letter of January 26, 1979, Applicant asserts it need not serve copies of correspondence to the Staff' which are not relevant to the proceeding.              It specifically defends, on the basis of lack of relevance, the failure to serve a copy of a letter sent to the applicant by.the Administrator of EPA and subsequently sent to the Staff by the applicant (which letter was deemed sufficiently relevant that both the Staff and Applicant attached it to
    -
brief.s filed with the ASLAB) and the failure to serve a copy of a letter describing its schedule for-responding to    ~
Staff inquiries (although it would be relevant ~to Appl.icant's allegations about the need to expedite completion of these
Staff inquiries (although it would be relevant ~to Appl.icant's allegations about the need to expedite completion of these
                         . hearings).        These graphic illustrations of Applicant's                                -
                         . hearings).        These graphic illustrations of Applicant's                                -
perverted concept of relevance are compelling argument's for the applicant being required to file with this Board
perverted concept of relevance are compelling argument's for the applicant being required to file with this Board and the parties copies of all communications with the Staff on the OPS proceeding.                          ,
        '
and the parties copies of all communications with the Staff on the OPS proceeding.                          ,
          -
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
                                                                                                    .
                                                                 /    W0,      / WW Anthony Z./Roisman cc:    service list                                                                    ,
                                                                 /    W0,      / WW Anthony Z./Roisman
*
* cc:    service list                                                                    ,
                                      .
                                    '
       ,3 n                              7903050 A5'*7
       ,3 n                              7903050 A5'*7
       .... au>ccuyu
       .... au>ccuyu j}}
          .
_
j}}

Latest revision as of 17:18, 1 February 2020

Requests That Applicant Be Required to File W/Aslb & Parties Copies of All Communications W/Nrc
ML19283B617
Person / Time
Site: Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 01/30/1979
From: Roisman A
National Resources Defense Council
To: Kornblith L, Schink D, Wolfe S
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, TEXAS A&M UNIV., COLLEGE STATION, TX
References
NUDOCS 7903050257
Download: ML19283B617 (1)
v • d • e


Text

Natural Resources Defense Council,Inc.

~

917 15Til sTartT, N.w.

WASIIINGToN, D.C. 2 0 005 e [J(jg 202 737-5ooo pEuTED ConBnsp0We'i fl'estern Ofice 'YX[ Q New York 0$ ice 23451^ttsTntET '

1 2 EAST 42ND STREE PALo At To c^ur. gasos January 30, 1979 NEW TORK, N.Y. 2 0o17 415 327-soSo . sie gig-oosg

'Sheldon J. Wolfe, Esq.

' Atomic Safety and Licensing Board N -t U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 fy 4 '

h(\[M q*

.- ~

/[ .}.

Dr. David R. Schink 5 ',

Department of Oceanography D hgj.[ (#* 'hf ,

Texas A&M University oVJys /d/

College Station, Texas 77840 b ,, ,

. ce s i . a -

Lester Kornblith, Jr.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission -

Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: ,

Offshore Power Systems, Dkt. No. STN 50-437 Gentlemen:

In its letter of January 26, 1979, Applicant asserts it need not serve copies of correspondence to the Staff' which are not relevant to the proceeding. It specifically defends, on the basis of lack of relevance, the failure to serve a copy of a letter sent to the applicant by.the Administrator of EPA and subsequently sent to the Staff by the applicant (which letter was deemed sufficiently relevant that both the Staff and Applicant attached it to brief.s filed with the ASLAB) and the failure to serve a copy of a letter describing its schedule for-responding to ~

Staff inquiries (although it would be relevant ~to Appl.icant's allegations about the need to expedite completion of these

. hearings). These graphic illustrations of Applicant's -

perverted concept of relevance are compelling argument's for the applicant being required to file with this Board and the parties copies of all communications with the Staff on the OPS proceeding. ,

Sincerely,

/ W0, / WW Anthony Z./Roisman cc: service list ,

,3 n 7903050 A5'*7

.... au>ccuyu j

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19283B617&oldid=2377473"