ML19329B725

Representativeness of Facility Meteorological Data for 740804-750803 Re Long-Term Meteorlogical Conditions.

ML19329B725
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	02/23/1976
From:	Dinunno J, Taylor J NUS CORP.
To:
References
1785, NUS-1644, NUDOCS 8002060733
Download: ML19329B725 (36)

Text

N US- 1644 REPRESENTATIVENESS OF THE DAVIS-BESSE METEOROLOGICAL DATA FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 4,1974 THRO UGH AUGUST 3,1975 WITH RESPECT TO LONG-TERM METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS THE ATTACHED FILES ARE OFFICI AL RECORDS - ,

OF THE OFFICE OF REGULATION. THEY HAVE t.

BEEN CHARGED TO YOU FOR A LIMITED,ilME PERIOD ANS MUST BE RETURNED TO THE- @p #

CENTRAL RECORDS STATION 008. ANY RdGE(SF REMOVED FOR REPRODUCTION MUST BE' RETURNED TO ITS/THEIR ORIGINAL ORDER. N E DEADLINE RETURN DATE Eo- 6 3 0 o F Sn,w *- n9s g ,

O o E rn

} MARY JINKS, CHIEF 8002060 CENTRAL RECORDS STATION A

NUS-1644 i

REPRESENTATIVENESS OF THE DAVIS-BESSE METEOROLOGICAL i DATA FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 4,1974 THROUGH AUGUST 3,1975 WITH RESPECT TO LONG-TERM METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS Prepared For .

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY .

February 1976 4

Environmental Safegnerds Division NUS Corporation 4 Research Place Rockville, Maryland 20850 .

Approved: #- - Approved:'

'C /

Achn H.'Tayloi, hMager

< n J6seph J. DiNunno Meteorological Programs Vice President & General Manager Environmental Safeguards Division 6

4 e

,e -

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Pace f

~

I Introduction 1 II Wind Direction and Speed 2 III Wind Direction Persistence 4

. IV Atmospheric Stability 5 V Summary and Conclusions 7 References 8 i

i

/

w

.(*

s 1

h k

r-

~

l LIST OF TABLES Table Title Pace

~

l Average Wind Speeds for the Davis-Besse 9 Site, the Toledo Express Airport, and the Fermi Site 2 One-Sector (22.5-Degree) Wind Direction 10 Persistence Probability for the Davis-Besse Site (August 4,1974-August 3,1975) and Toledo Express Airport (January 1,1960-December 31, 1964) 3 Maximum One-Sector (22.5-Degree) Wind 11 Direction Persistence for the Davis-Besse Site (August 4,1974-August 3,1975) 4 Maximum One-Sector (22.5-Degree) Wind 12 Direction Persistence for Toledo Express Airport (January 1,1960-December 31, 1964) 5 Annual AT Stability Distribution Comparisons 13 for the Davis-Besse and the Perry Sites M

11

LIST OF FIGURES Floure . Title 1 Davis-Besse site monthly wind distributions at the 35-ft level: August, September, October and November 1974 2 Davis-Besse site monthly wind di.2tributions at the 35-ft level: December 1974, January, February, and March 1975 3 .

- Davis-Besse site monthly wind distributions at the 35-ft level: April, May, June, and July 1975 4 Davis-Besse site seasonal wind distributions at the 35-ft level: spring, sumrrer, fall, and winter 5

Davis-Besse site annual wind distributions at the 35-h level, August 4,1974-August 3,1975 6 Davis-Besse site monthly wind distributions at the 250-ft level: August, September, October, and November 1974 7 Davis-Besse site monthly wind distributions at the 250-ft level: December 1974, January, February, and March 1975 8 Davis-Besse site monthly wird distributions at the 250-ft level: April, May, June, and July 1975 9

Davis-Resse site seasonal wind distributions at the 250-ft level: spring, summer, fall, and winter 10 Davis-Besse site annual wind distributions at the

.- 250-ft level, August 4,1974-August 3,1975 11 Toledo Express Airport monthly wind distributions:

August, September, October, and November 1974 12 Toledo Express Airport monthly wind distributions:

December 1974, January, February, and March 1975 111 l j

LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) figurg Titig 13 Toledo Express Airport monthly wind distributions:

April, May, June, and July 1975 14 Toledo Express Airport seasonal wind distributions:

spring, summer, fall, and winter 15 Toledo Express Airport annual wind distributions, August 4,1974-August 3,1975 16 Toiedo Express Airport seasonal wind distributions, January 1,1960-December 31, 1969 17 Toledo Express Airport annual wind distributions, January 1,1960-December 31, 1969 J

(-

s iv

I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to show the representativeness of the meteoro-logical data collected at the site of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station

, during the 1-yr period August 4,1974, through August 3,1975, with respect to long-term conditions expected at the site. Comparisons were made between onsite data and those available offsite data that are considered to be reason-ably representative of the Davis-Besse site, as related to the calculation of atmospheric diffusion estimates (X/Q).

Although there are no directly comparable wind ' data for the 250-ft level,

, these data are presented since they are at the nominal height of release of radioactive effluents. Comparison of these data with the 35-ft level and offsite wind data is made only to indicate that these data do not have un-usual distributions or anomalies.

4 1

II. WIND DIRECTION AND SPEED Wind data collected at the Davis-Besse site are compared to offsite wind data from Toledo Express Airport and the Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant site.

The Davis-Besse site is located on the southern shore of Iake Erie. Toledo Express Airport is 40 miles west of the Davis-Besse site, approximately 20 miles from Lake Erie. The Fe..nl site is 26 miles north-northwest of the Davis-Besse site on the western shore of Lake Erie. The terrain in the vicinity of all three locations is flat.

Figures 1 through 10 present the Davis-Besse onsite monthly, seasonal, and annual distributions of wind direction and speed for the 35- and 250-ft levels during the period August 4,1974-August 3,1975. Prevailing winds for both levels were from the southwest.

Figures 11 through 15 present monthly, seasonal, and annual wind speed and direction distributions for the Toledo Express Airport for the same 1-yr period as the onsite data . The Toledo Express Airport distributions are based on 3-hourly observations (once every 3 hr, eight observations per 24-hr per-tod). The wind instrumentation at the Toledo Express Airport was at 30 ft above ground level (AGL) during this period. Comparison of these figures with Figures 1 through 10 shows good agreement on a seasonal and annual basis between onsite and Toledo Express Airport observations. There is a higher frequency of calms noted at the Toledo Express Airport. This is,mainly due to the higher starting threshold of the anemometer used at the airport compared to that at the Davis-Besse site (-2.0 mph vs less than 1.0 inph).

Figurus 16 and 17 present seasonal and annual wind direction and wind speed distributions for the Toledo Express Airport for the 10-yr period January 1,1960-December 31, 1969. These dist ;butions are based on hourly data (24 observa-

. tions per 24-hr period) for January 1,1960-December 31,1964, and 3-hourly observations for the remainder of the period. The wind sensor was at a height 2

of 20 ft AGL from January 1,1960, to November 1,1968, and at 30 ft AGL

, thereafter. This difference in sensor heights should be relatively inconsequen-tial for summaries of wind data for the entire 10-yr period. Comparison of these figures with onsite data and the Toledo Express Airport data covering the

, . Same 1-yr period as the onsite data shows general agreement between the data sets and consistent patterns for the prevailing wind.

Additional wind direction data that were examined were those collected at the Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Site. The Fermi site data, collected at the 33-ft (reported as 10-m) and 197-ft (reported as 60-m) levels for the period September 1,1973-August 31, 1974, show good agreement on an annual basis

, with onsite data. Fermi site data are presented in Re f.1.

Table 1 presents monthly, seasonal, and annual wind speed data for the Davis-Besse site (35- and 250-ft levels), the Toledo Express Airport (con-current and 10-yr summaries), and the Fermi site (33-ft level). Examination of the table shows good agreement among all data sets, t

e f

e 4

3

f III. WIND DIRECTION PERSISTENCE Wind direction persistence is defined for this report as a continuous wind flow

, from a given 22.5-degree sector. In Table 2 is presented the probability of wind direction persistence for the 35- and 250-ft levels for the August 4,1974-August 3,1975, onsite data and the January 1,1960-December 31, 1964 Toledo Express Airport data. (Only hourly data can be used for wind direc-tion persistence analysis.) Comparison of the 35-ft onsite data to the 5-yr Toledo Express Airport data shows good agreement for all probabilities. How-ever, the Fermi site data for September 1,1973-August 31, 1974, presented

, in Ref.1, indicate lower probabilities of wind direction persistence periods than do either the Davis-Besse site data or the~ Toledo Express Airport long-term data.

Table 3 presents the maximum one-sector wind direction persistence periods for each of the 16 directions plus calms for the 1-yr onsite data. The maximum wind direction persistence at the 35-ft level was associated with a 23-hr wind

, from the west-southwest. The maximum wind direction persistence period at the 250-ft level was associated with a 26-hr wind from the east.

Table 4 presents the maximum wind direction persistence periods for the Toledo Express Airport for January 1,1960-December 31, 1964. The maximum was associated with a 37-hr wind frun the east-northeast. Maximum wind direction

~

persistence periods from the Fermi data are presented in Ref.1. These data are generally consistent with the Davis-Besse arxi Toledo Express Airport re-

]

suits presented in this report, with the maximum persistence periods being  !

1 associated with winds from the northeast and southwest, and with a secondary maximum to the northwest. i l

s 4 l 1

1

IV. ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY The parameter used to classify onsite atmosphe-ic stability is the vertical tem-perature difference (AT). Data collected at the Davis-Besse site for the tem-perature difference between the 250- and 35-ft levels (6T250'-35,) are used in calculating the diffusion estimates.

No representative long-term offsite 6T data are available for comparison with onsite data. However, there are two other nuclear power plant sites on the shore of Lake Erie at which 1 year of 6T measurements have been made and stability distribution data are readily available. These two sites are the Fermi site and the Perry Nuclear Power Plart site, which is located approximate-ly 100 miles east-northeast of the Davis-Besse site.

When comparing 6T distributions from sites near a large body of water, such as Iake Erie, the orientation of the sites to the lake and the distance inland from the lake of the temperature sensors' are important in assessing the modi-

, fication of temperatures associated with the lake-land interface.

I The stability data from the Fermi site were obtained from a meteorological tower located within 200 ft of the shoreline of Lake Erie (Ref.1.). The Davis-Besse and Perry towers are 6100 and 3700 ft, respectively, from the lakeshore  !

(Refs. 2 and 3). The general topography in the vicinity of all three locations is similar (flat). However, becauss of the relative locations of the meteoro-I l

logical towers with respect to the lake at Davis-Besse, Fermi, and Perry, only Perry 6T data can be realistically compared to Davis-Besse 6T data. l l

l Annual distributions of stability classes based on 6T250'-35, f r DaWs-Besse and 6T200'-35, f r Perry are presented in Table 5.

5

The actual distributions from the two locations are not identical, of course,

, mainly because of differences in locations, data periods, and sensor separa-tions . However, the trends for the two data sets are very similar, with the largest occurrence being the neutral (D) and slightly stable (E) classes.

/

]

e d

4

/

h i

4 0

l O

s a

j 6

l

V.

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS The 1-yr onsite data have been compared with the following offsite data:

1. Longer term (10-yr) data from the Toledo Express Airport.

2. Concurrent data from the Toledo Express Airport.

3. One-year data frcm the site of the Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant.

4. One-year data from the site of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant.

The comparison shows good agreement for all pertinent data used for diffusion estimate calculations. No significant anomalies or departures from expected -

normals for these pertinent data were found. Wind speed and direction distri-butionc and wind persistence data are in general agreement with the Toledo Express

, Airport and Fermi data. No representative long-term offsite AT data or direct-ly comparable stability data are available for analysis. For comparison pur-poses, AT stability distributions from the Perry Nuclear Power Plant site also on the southern shore of Iake Erie were examined. The annual AT 200'-35' distributions from the Perry site for the 1 yr examined are very similar (with allowances for differences in locations, data periods, and sensor separations) to the onsite Davis-Besse AT 250'-35' * *

• On the basis of these results, the onsite data for this period are considered to be representative of the long-term conditions to be expected at the Davis- '

Besse site.

7

l REFERENCES

1. - Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2 - Final Safety Analysis Report, AEC Docket No. 50-341, Section 2.3. '

i

2. Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Units 2 & 3 - Preliminarv Safety Analysis Report, AEC Docket Nos. 50-500 and 50-501, Revision 4, Section 2.3.

3. Perry Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 - Preliminary Safety Analysis Report, AEC Docket Nos. 50-440 and 50-441, Section 2.3.

e e

/

f a

e 8

v -

s s . . .

TABLE 1 AVERAGE WIND SPEEDS FOR THE DAVIS-BESSE SITE, THE TOLEDO EXPRESS AIRPORT, AND THE FERMI SITE Level Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. JaA Feb. Mar. Apr. June h v_ July Spr. Sum. Fall Win. Annual Davis-Besse Site. August 4. 1974-August 3. 1975 35-foot 7.0 9.2 9.0 11.0 10.3 12.9 12.3 13.2 12.3 8.6 9.9 7.4 11.3 8.1 11.9 9.7 10.2 250-foot 11.8 15.0 14.8 16.4 15.7 18.5 15.9 18.2 17.3 12.6 14.8 11.2 16.0 12.5 15.4 16.8 15.2 Toledo E* press Airport. August 4. 1974-August 3. 1975 30-foot 6.5 8.1 8.2 9.7 9.0 11.4 11.1 11.3 10.8 7.9 8.4 6.3 10.0 7.1 8.7 10.5 9.1 Toledo Express Airport. January 1. 1960-December 31, 1969 (a) -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- - -- - -

10.6 7.8 8.9 10.8 9.5 e

Fermi Site, September 1. 1973-August 31, 1974 33-foot 7.6 9.6 9.1 10.9 12.1 10.6 11.0 12.0 11.9 11.4 7.9 8.8 11.8 8.1 9.9 11.3 10.5

a. Data for January 1, 1960-November 1, 1968, taken at a 20-foot level; data for November 1. 1968-Decer.ber 31, 1969, taken at a 30-foot level,

b. Data from Ref. 1.

9 e

r TABLE 2 ONE-SECTOR (22.5-DEGREE) WIND DIRECTION PERSISTENCE PROBABILITY

• FOR THE DAVIS-BESSE SITE (AUGUST 4, 1974-AUGUST 3, 1975) AND TOLEDO EXPRESS AIRPORT (JANUARY 1,1960-DECEMBER 31, 1964)

Probability of Davis-Besse, Davis-Besse, Toledo Express Persistence i t (%) 35-ft Level 250-ft Level Airport 1 16.5 21.0 16.0 5 10.5 13.0 10.0 10 8.5 10.0 7.5 25 5.0 5.5 4.0 50 2.5 3.0 2.0

• Includes calms; values rounded to the nearest half hour.

F e

b e

" O 10

TABLE 3 MAXIMUM ONE-SECTOR (22.5-DEGREE) WIND DIRECTION PERSISTENCE FOR THE DAVIS-BESSE SITE (AUGUST 4, 1974-AUGUST 3, 1975)

/

Maximum Wind Direction Persistence (hr)

Wind Direction 35-ft Level 250-ft Level i

l NNE 13 10

.- NE 13 20 ENE 10 11 E 21 26 ESE 9 12

< SE 10 9 SSE 9 11 S 12 13 SSW 18 10 SW 14 19 WSW 23 15 W 14 23 WNW 7 15 NW 20 25

NNW 11 17 N 9 12 Calm 2 2 p

11

~_, ,  ;. __ . _.

~

t

. TABLE 4

~

MAXIMUM ONE-SECTOR (22.5-DEGREE) WIND DIRECTION PERSISTENCE FOR TOLEDO EXPRE3S AIRPORT (JANUARY 1, 1960-DECEMBER 31, 1964)

Wind Direction Persistence Period (hr)

NNE 15 NE 18 ENE 37

, E 26 ESE 11 SE 9 SSE 11

, S 16 SSW 22 SW 16 WSW 31 W 17 WNW 16 hv 17 NNW 13 N 19 Calm 15 i

4 D

i 12

2

- TABLE 5 ANNUAL AT STABILITY DISTRIBUTION

• COMPARISONS FOR THE DAVIS-BESSE AND THE PERRY SITES e Stability Category Frequency (%)

Site A B C D E F G Davis-Besse 1.14 2.89 4.22 53.59 27.94 7.27 2.95 (8/4/74-8/3/75),

AT 250'-35' Perry ** 4.84 3.58 4.81 47.97 24.68 7.37 6.75 (5/1/72-4/30/73),

0 200'-35' i

a

• Categories are based on Regulatory Guide 1.23 classification.

• • Data from Ref. 3.

i f

i

)

i i

l 13

y a s +  %

s. # *~

,,.. 8

[ . o '

, , . ca.n i

$3

1

.3 PC 3.1 PC

),

f x -

<a * 'e  !

se, p 'sa J 3 0 P.UGUS7 SEPTOBER 722obs 691obs N N h & h - .

1. # 4-S 8 }  %

l

, Que .

1. st # ,

i m 14 t l' S 6 PC *

• g,; pc 8 s 8

'

• e, p 4 @ sg ,#

1. h OCTOSER NOVEMSER 743obs 718obs summes WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY ( PERCENT )

e=zzza MEAN WIND SPEED C MI/HR) i Figure 1. Davis-Besse site monthly wind distributions at the 35-ft level: August, September, October, and November 1974.

1

W N

N Y Y

+* $  %

• ^

h[ . ,z

g 8.J PC . . -

3.J PC 1

$ t '

?

5 + * \

see +s s.,

=

s-  ;

a i

DECOGER JANUARY 697obs 741obs i 9

4 N  !  %

4 4 4 h k l r

, m lea PC 9

,\g'

~

1 #

.a 1,0 P0.'-

3 50

', 1

)

i '

l l '

l

? -

• '+ 5 l n + <n

s. \

1 FEB RUARY PARCH 654obs 735cbs.

- WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY ( PERCENT )

c:zzms MEAN WIND SPEED ( MI/HR) l Figure 2. Davis-Besse site monthly wind distributions at the 35-ft

! level: December 1974, January, February, and March 1975.

l I

4 4 h -% d5  %

e ,

g y

• i e j ,

g

,0 0 ,

L3

, c g 1 1, m

• 3,4 Pc f.4 PC I

/

s

. l f t. <

% 5  % # \

l eev & 64 & \

E s l I

1. . AY w

pp a 679ob; 743cbs

" n e  % s s \

l 1 h , 4,

! s / ,

t-i q,_JJ

1. j s.4 PC 3.4 PC

• l * . 1

~ .

1 4 4 #

4ey g#- 64 ju E b JJNE J.rLY 703cbs 737obs summmen WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY ( PERCENT )

mzzzzzi MEAN WIND SPEED C MI/HR)

Figure 3. Davis-Besse site montaly wind distributions at the 35-ft level: April, Mer, June, and July 1975.

l l

i

4 N

% g4 Ac

% # k

• 7 ,

[ l

' , to a [ i = ,, ,, e*

,g 1>-

,7,, .

,A ],

\

/ ,- i e $

1. 'a J 4% mju he ,6

f. SPRING SUMMtR 2157 09 5. 2164 095.

N

~a Y N & %s-A # 4 2

4 ,

k [ f.

! go

- N i g3 tc 83 OLH

• L' I 3

• * . CALM d.2 PC 8.3 PC I!

[ . .

& + #

ase sh s a FALL WINTER aisa oss. aosa oes.

su mmma WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY C PERCENT )

tzzzzz:s MEAN WIND SPEED C MI/HR3 i

Figure 4. Davis-Besse site seasonal wind distributions at the 35-ft level: spring, summer, fall, and winter.

N ggA N4p M $*

4 = U

,, 8 5

/

(in 0

k' 30 gg 15 L5 LO

< CALM x M7= , m

'u = 0.1 PC /

j I i k>

/

?

/ s /

/

)l /

s-Y/

vs

(

Sh h'

SSy 9ss ANNUAL 5

8563obs

- WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY (PERCENT) mzz:za MEAN WIND SPEED C MI/HR)

Figure 5. Davis-Besse site annual wind distributions at the 35-ft level, August 4, 1974-August 3, 1975.

l l

9 9

1. % 4 4

8 l A 1 l 1 g c1 ., > a LO l'

. - AM i

! .g . LO 4,9 PC g,J pc ,

f

. k. , e

+ r * ~

'< esy ,;

ti h e AUGUST SEPTEMBtR 739obs 684obs M N

% 44  %

3 3 d

.- t .

- 2

.m -- g , ,

. -g. - ,

l q + ,

+

4 5 4ev s#-

S s

OCTOBER

• WMMBER 561obs 698obs

- WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY ( PERCENT )

c:=z:2 MEAN WIND SPEED C MI/HR) l l

Figure 6. Davis-Besse site monthly wind distributions at the 250-ft level: August, September, October, and November 1974.

=me em~

4 4

4E N 40 %g

[ \ k Y

~

p, 4

, - gs 15 # f ' .. to D #

CALM

,, clut "

I,3 PC j -

, f eJ Pc - #

i

\

/

N jy a

e i

& N  % g ero +5 ke \

p c i n f DECEM9ER Jr;NU(1RY 711obs 741obs 9

.de  %~

/

g ' ^9 s h \

[ 1 h -

o ;$ 2"

' /  ; .,3

, = 'a g _ -. . t c- e i N

\ $ +

c

4, J-s,, s *** 5 s

FEBRUF4RY MR5 565cbs 673cbs numan WINO DIRECTION FREQUENCY C PERCENT )

er= s MEAN WIND SPEED C MI/HR)

Figure 7. Davis-Besse site monthly wind distributions at the 250-ft level: December 1974, January, February, and March 1975.

-.-s

w w

/ . '4 e

1. 4 4 A A  %  !  %

0 ,,

y e e" (

l

.,,g g a e"

, _ _ . CAL M , , N I 3.4 Pc - 3.3 PC l,

? \ $

4 y s

y 6sv JL u

f APRIL MAY 697obs 713obs N

4

~

0  %

$ e W / }

$ y  %

9 0 0 .

! g g 3

, , W ^ '

m '

8eJ PC

• CAU4 , ."

3,9pc g - ,'

~

.k. <

s &

W h 44y g6 N suty 609obs 720obs.

- WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY ( PERCENT )

czz::z:s MEAN WIND SPEED C MI/HR) i Figure 8. Davis-Besse site monthly wind distributions at the 250-ft level: April, May, June, and July 1975. l l

l 9

1 l

g 9

.med  % 4  %

em

• 'V a' .D 8 I  % ( '

l

,, .,, o . t **\ .. o $

/- _

e .& PC - 6eJ PC 4  ; ,

l

~

~ .

e

>  % N GA .

s# sy a 56

= .

I 8UMMER SPRING 2003 OBS. a068 0B5.

9 w 2 V 2 >

4 / .g l i

, , t , .

I 13 /

n cu s g

I ' cu '.' 16 d ,

8.1 Pc - - 0 i PC ' f

, os S l 1 I l

% ., .y

.# 6ev i a u FALL WINTER 1944 OBS. 2017 OBS.

summmaus WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY (PERCENT) cczzz:s MEAN VIND SPEED ( MI/HR)

Figure 9. Davis-Besse site seasonal wind distributions at the 250-ft level: spring, sumer, f all, and winter.

N SSY N46' r

$ /

'It

-> N $

2 '

i

/

f I$ g zo as 3 10 3 ' ' ' '

'Mm' '

TC" 'T"x s s sxsi m u

/ s l

z

/

B. Cry

• 7 VJ

/

d

/

Ssy sst ANNUAL g

811 lobs ammmum WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY (PERCENT) ezzzza MEAN WIND SPEED (MI/HR)

Figure 10. Davis-Besse site annual wind distritations at the 250-ft l level, August 4, 1975-August 3, 1975.

~

l

M N

1. k # /  %

. "A

, l l e 10 l g e 10 m _ LO , 9 -

m O

" * ~

u .6PC - foi PC

~

k h w X

/

% 9  % $

a4 g g ,

S S

( AUGUST SEPTEMSER N N

, #  % 4 s a g g o c* i

,oen 7 C '- * -

3 pc I- ' ,t w \

s . L r r f w

8 s

GCTOBER NOVEMBER mummma WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY CPERCENT) tzz::zz:s MEAN WIND SPEED C MI/HR)

Figure 11. Toledo Express Airport monthly wind distributions: August, September, October, and November 1974.

l l

n n M  % M 'k s

4 k. #

l

' ^

i

! \

l g o So

' g o 10 y

- d I . Csque . d 4.4 P:: ._-~

1.4 PC -  ;*

~

\

]

l i

% *  %

• l i

% p  % l 3 S l

/

DECE.MBER JANUARY N N M  % M  %

N L  %

f - , t- .

f . .. a et

t.7 PC. 3.4 PC - *

. l

^

E y va y

1

%  % 6 S

S FEBRUARY MARCH mmmmm WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY CPERCENT) cczzzzi MEAN VIND SPEED C MI/HR)

Figure 12. Toledo Express Airport monthly wind distributions: Decem-ber 1974, Janu cy, February, and March 1975.

9

N N

% *dI k i  %

,a e, 0 *

~

_ ggJe C. .

- , s5

• m tel PC - f

~

s.4 PC

]

y .

t

% G

% 'b M 3 S

, APRIL MAY N

N 444

% g4 i

.g i

. 03Je

, ., o U ' d g a t- *

• ,,_m , , gaje 2g 4.2 PC , u,ypc ,m i

\ k j 4

g

% c  %

3 3

_ +

M JULY summmme WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY ( PERCENT )

czzz:m MEAN WIND SPEED C MI/HR)

Figure 13. Toledo Express Airport monthly wind distributions: April, May, June, and July 1975.

i l

N N N ga

I N

I  %

l O

_ cst.M # f -N .) to

., , tsus ,

4.1 PC f.5 PC

~

$ ~

e '+ +

3 S

( SPRING SUMER H N

.ese 44  %

R -- J  %-

"6 i

.,, t a" ,o e" a N m N

^

s.7 Pc j t.S PC m j

\ .

I I

• , e

% e  % +

5 8 FALL WINTER mummmes WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY C PERCENT )

czzzm MEAN WIND SPEED C MI/HR)

Figure 14. Toleds Express Airport seasonal wind distributions: spring, sumer, f all, and winter.

N

1. NNe

1. *e 8 $

s

/

$ ES 30 E0 l 1.0 15 '

3 ' ' =''4 '

5 C )

-_ k e

L C  %

6 lu l

O/r G3 SSy ysst g ANNUAL i

l ammunes WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY CPERCENT) .

czzzzza MEGN WIND SPEED C MI/HR)

Figure 15. Tcledo Express Airport annual wind distributions, August 4, 1974-August 3, 1975.

k.

4 4 WA N b

1 i

I k I

g U QLM

^

3 3 PC

~

_W _

f.4 PC l

4 4 m s-

%  % J-b S

SPRING SURErt g

9 4  %

?

I

% l

'  ;

c. 9 o 28 l '

, __ ULN 8./ PC g

~ ._ t.sLA -

g c*eS .

, 1 1.3 PC i i l l

. a f l

\

4 4 I i

l

& I S

, mLL WINTER i

ammma WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY CPERCENT) czzzza MEAN WIND SPEED C MI/HR)

Figure 16.

Toledo Express Airport seasonal wind distributions, January 1, 1960-December 31, 1969.

N

$$S NNE 8  ?

/ \

t Ik ~

2.0 d

g L5

( CALM 3 j

i 2:

s '5.5 PC rssss sss m

7

$  ;

4 6

$ g in

, j

% & \

l SSy c,66 1 g ANNUAL numann WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY C PERCENT )

czzzza MEAN WIND SPEED C MI/HR) l Figure 17. Toledo Express Airport annual wind distributions, January 1, 1960-December 31, 1969.

.; - ,

g-

- . . .7 - S e. .

s .7 4 Rs' g~ w s

.- y t.

./ ,_

• spi' i 8

' s

, g (

. ' . . , ','4

, . g .,, s

, j, ,j r *- " * ,

) .'

e n . .'  : 3  ; --

'- .. / 5 ".

-4 3^-

g<

~

. . . ,. .. = . -

1 ,a -

. .- [

y, l._. ' 9$-'#'

y -n.

s -

r ,g i

,' -

. g p .

,. ., i s .

q; g 4s n y , .,

..-. m -. t . x.

%1 y +

y,.. , s .n.-

, ', .  %< (w y 4

.r c g .~. ..

> a

-V "'

I.

an - , ' ' ' I. .,  :

2. * -

.a y

.e, e ,-i ' . ' , . f -< * ..

' ., .* {

- , % ).

':., ' , ~ "' 3 ;' .' y

. L., .

54 14 i

g.

N -

s.'

. '" ' . : .- J-

.,g

, e.

J

?

t,. ..

[t..

.: j'. ' j , .> -Q .- >

aj -

7p i - "

/ ; ,

,. - . .*gg# , g . '

' g " ., a.

? Ye n' ~.

l.e:

'..' . ., c ,.

t  %. . ~. ..

s . , .

c -

s-

[.  ? 4

, ,. , 7-

7. ,. *, '

g -

, ,  ;.-,.. '

r- . -_ ~ .

• k .. . .. q e

1. ,. , j g

.' 5 . . . ,,l

. ."'.'W~-

I.

,_, y.  ; ,- .l '*

. .,,, b l *

• h ,,

= x. ,

.t , - -

. . . ., ..s g- ,

,.s . ~

,'4 i .

c .. ,

-f

' ,g

.. j' - .

. , 4 ,

.e, # '

@ g "

4 i

.Y i .

~

l- < . - - ].l

,

. . l '- .

h # -

2-

. a;p p:

y ,; + -

/ - :

;-

;

c

~

-a . ..

f .~ w..

c.

. .. ). -

~

t

' I  ? *: .

]},

4- .v . .

, & -I ,.

^

~ ^

')

'f

, f, _ ,. .. . .

.' {  ;

g --

~

'N

. . _ . . ~ .

.. , p . . , . . - s .)

% . . ' ( ,,

l '*

3 .y ,

^

2 -

f, *

.A i A .. r * /. .,

. g ___

.4 ,< e4 -

5 y L s

s . ..a

. s.

,; , -

f. - -

., , p 2 4

7 . "

' y - ', '

,, ~ , * ,_ r

g , , ,t ,

3 ,

I

~

A ,. - .

m n mRABhr4 tdt e.

. iulegasciarmy ataf stisestefiIehkSt

_ _n satse pt the

~ '

m,

.3 - comret etessneo.austupennaitmises.uneaetatem.gehnapoy- os t..c

. . .. , - t . , . .

."% g

- +

• e -

Of e  : +

, e ..

a. y _

R 8-

$f \

-r > , .. , e s e g- f

• g ' , ,; >*

. s -' .

$l} h

+ '

, . .. t ~..

, , , ' r. \ l g r e. m a-

~_:

. )

~' ,

p.

. . '4 >

. . ' j.? g. 4 [ ,

g t -

g . ,.-

, _ , _ _- g .

• ' ^ *

..=

~.; * , . ?q , gl- , .  :. , 7.f ~' ~

m

- ,; .- - ~

's t,

- . ~

+1

.i-- '

2 3 . ,,

=> f,

.  ; , .

.p

, 'f .. p; .' '

4

,ft g + +

I

~ ' *

" ' '~ ~- .y

... . . - :w +

n. . - :. . , i .

- - ,y.

,y

.g - .

. .. . y t 4 5

• . l I 9

k , '- ,

l ,

.q 5

9 '=

.,., s .

k s

e- - - #. - 'g t

e$ '.

y S

..'- g$

[

x. , ,

-c

- , g- y . , ,

9- .g: -- ' - ,,

+ ... ., '* 4(.

.. ,-) s

' , W t . .'N.

Y .h4 &4 hWyf}48 &

' :W ' WR l '

.$567 & , LQ; .

f

. {_, ..'

Ra@sacaca ans 4temswetetyfhcesa enga .q yene enli@yestsee {^

,; ' , . . -

.: , ; ,  ; -

.

,:q xi ,. s y

• .l <

=.

4

. . . r ~

.. , _ . , ..,.[, +  ;.

l,. . .. . . . r. Y -  ?!. '*

? .. .. '. l '

. . . . N. . .

s