IR 05000461/2009301: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 October 22, 2009  
{{#Wiki_filter:ber 22, 2009


Mr. Charles Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road
==SUBJECT:==
 
CLINTON POWER STATION NRC INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION REPORT 05000461/2009301(DRS)
Warrenville IL 60555
 
SUBJECT: CLINTON POWER STATION NRC INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION REPORT 05000461/2009301(DRS)


==Dear Mr. Pardee:==
==Dear Mr. Pardee:==
On September 18, 2009, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed the initial operator licensing examination process at your Clinton Power Station. The enclosed report presents the results of the examination which were discussed with Mr. F. Kearney and other members of your staff on September 3, 2009, and Ms. K. Baker on September 18, 2009.
On September 18, 2009, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed the initial operator licensing examination process at your Clinton Power Station. The enclosed report presents the results of the examination which were discussed with Mr. F. Kearney and other members of your staff on September 3, 2009, and Ms. K. Baker on September 18, 2009.


The NRC examiners administered initial license examination operating tests from August 24 through September 3, 2009. Members of the Clinton Training Department administered the initial license written examinat ion on September 4, 2009. Five reactor operator (RO) and two senior reactor operator (SRO) license examinations were administered. Two of the applicants were previously licensed ROs at the Clinton Power Station.
The NRC examiners administered initial license examination operating tests from August 24 through September 3, 2009. Members of the Clinton Training Department administered the initial license written examination on September 4, 2009. Five reactor operator (RO) and two senior reactor operator (SRO) license examinations were administered. Two of the applicants were previously licensed ROs at the Clinton Power Station. The results of the examinations were finalized on October 15, 2009. All 13 applicants passed all sections of their examinations resulting in the issuance of one reactor operator and eight senior reactor operator licenses. Four reactor operator licenses were not issued pending determination of respective medical condition(s).
 
The results of the examinations were finalized on October 15, 2009. All 13 applicants passed all sections of their examinations resulting in the issuance of one reactor operator and eight senior reactor operator licenses. Four reactor operator licenses were not issued pending determination of respective medical condition(s).


In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Record s System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this examination.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this examination.


Sincerely,
Sincerely,
/RA by B. Palagi for/
/RA by B. Palagi for/
Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-461 License No. NPF-62  
Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-461 License No. NPF-62


===Enclosures:===
===Enclosures:===
1. Operator Licensing Examination Report 050000461/2009301(DRS) 2. Simulation Facility Report 3. Written Examinations and Answer Keys (RO and SRO)  
1. Operator Licensing Examination Report 050000461/2009301(DRS)
2. Simulation Facility Report 3. Written Examinations and Answer Keys (RO and SRO)


REGION III==
REGION III==
Docket Nos: 50-461 License Nos: NPF-62 Report No: 05000461/2009301(DRS)
Docket Nos: 50-461 License Nos: NPF-62 Report No: 05000461/2009301(DRS)
Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Facility: Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 Location: Clinton, IL  
Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Facility: Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 Location: Clinton, IL Dates: August 24 through September 18, 2009 Examiners: M. Bielby, Chief Examiner C. Moore, Examiner C. Zoia, Examiner Approved by: Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure 1
 
Dates: August 24 through September 18, 2009 Examiners: M. Bielby, Chief Examiner C. Moore, Examiner C. Zoia, Examiner  
 
Approved by: Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure 1 1


=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
ER 05000461/2009301(DRS); 08/24/09 - 09/18/09; Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Clinton Power Station, Unit 1; Initial License Examination Report.
ER 05000461/2009301(DRS); 08/24/09 - 09/18/09; Exelon Generation Company, LLC;


The announced operator licensing initial examination was conducted by regional examiners in accordance with the guidance of NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1.
Clinton Power Station, Unit 1; Initial License Examination Report.


Examination Summary
The announced operator licensing initial examination was conducted by regional examiners in accordance with the guidance of NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 9, Supplement 1.
$ Thirteen examinations were administered (five-reactor operator and eight-senior reactor operator); and
$ All thirteen applicants passed all sections of their examinations resulting in the issuance of one reactor operator and eight senior reactor operator licenses. Four reactor operator licenses were not issued pending determination of respective medical condition(s).


2
Examination Summary:
$      Thirteen examinations were administered (five-reactor operator and eight-senior reactor operator); and
$      All thirteen applicants passed all sections of their examinations resulting in the issuance of one reactor operator and eight senior reactor operator licenses. Four reactor operator licenses were not issued pending determination of respective medical condition(s).


=REPORT DETAILS=
=REPORT DETAILS=
Line 72: Line 63:


====a. Examination Scope====
====a. Examination Scope====
The NRC examiners conducted an announced oper ator licensing initial examination during the weeks of August 24 and August 31, 2009. The facility licensee's training staff used the guidance prescribed in NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1, to prepare the outline and develop the written examination and operating test. The examiners administered the operating test, consisting of job performance measures and dynamic simulator scenarios, during the period of August 24 through September 3, 2009. The facility licensee administered the written examination on September 4, 2009. Five reactor operator and eight senior reactor operator applicants were examined. During the on-site validation week of August 3, 2009, the examiners audited four license applications for accuracy.
The NRC examiners conducted an announced operator licensing initial examination during the weeks of August 24 and August 31, 2009. The facility licensees training staff used the guidance prescribed in NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 9, Supplement 1, to prepare the outline and develop the written examination and operating test. The examiners administered the operating test, consisting of job performance measures and dynamic simulator scenarios, during the period of August 24 through September 3, 2009. The facility licensee administered the written examination on September 4, 2009. Five reactor operator and eight senior reactor operator applicants were examined. During the on-site validation week of August 3, 2009, the examiners audited four license applications for accuracy.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Written Examination The NRC examiners determined that the written examination, as originally submitted by the licensee, was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.
Written Examination The NRC examiners determined that the written examination, as originally submitted by the licensee, was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.


All changes made to the submitted examination were made in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Exami nation Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 1, Supplement 1. The licensee graded the written examination on September 4, 2009, and conducted a review of each question to determine the accuracy and validity of the examination questions. The licensee did not submit any post examination comments for consideration by the NRC examiners when grading the written examination or enhancements based on a post examination review with the applicants.
All changes made to the submitted examination were made in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 1, Supplement 1. The licensee graded the written examination on September 4, 2009, and conducted a review of each question to determine the accuracy and validity of the examination questions. The licensee did not submit any post examination comments for consideration by the NRC examiners when grading the written examination or enhancements based on a post examination review with the applicants.


Operating Test The NRC examiners determined that the operating test, as originally submitted by the licensee, was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination. All changes made to the submitted examination were made in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Exami nation Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 1, Supplement 1. The NRC examiners completed operating test grading on
Operating Test The NRC examiners determined that the operating test, as originally submitted by the licensee, was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.


October 7, 2009.
All changes made to the submitted examination were made in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,"
Revision 1, Supplement 1. The NRC examiners completed operating test grading on October 7, 2009.


3Examination Results All thirteen applicants passed all sections of their examinations resulting in the issuance of one reactor operator and eight senior reactor operator licenses. Four reactor operator licenses were not issued pending determination of respective medical condition(s).
Examination Results All thirteen applicants passed all sections of their examinations resulting in the issuance of one reactor operator and eight senior reactor operator licenses. Four reactor operator licenses were not issued pending determination of respective medical condition(s).


===.2 Examination Security===
===.2 Examination Security===


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The NRC examiners briefed the facility contact on the NRC's requirements and guidelines related to examination physical security (e.g., access restrictions and simulator considerations) and integrity in accordance with 10 CFR 55.49, "Integrity of Examinations and Tests," and NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standard for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. The examiners reviewed and observed the licensee's implementation and controls of examination security and integrity measures (e.g., security agreements) throughout the examination process.
The NRC examiners briefed the facility contact on the NRCs requirements and guidelines related to examination physical security (e.g., access restrictions and simulator considerations) and integrity in accordance with 10 CFR 55.49, Integrity of Examinations and Tests, and NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standard for Power Reactors, Revision 9, Supplement 1. The examiners reviewed and observed the licensees implementation and controls of examination security and integrity measures (e.g., security agreements) throughout the examination process.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No Findings  
No Findings {{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Meetings==


{{a|4OA6}}
Debrief The chief examiner presented the examination team's preliminary observations and findings on September 3, 2009, to Mr. F. Kearney, Site Vice-President, and other members of the Clinton Operations and Training Department staff.
==4OA6 Meetings==
Debrief The chief examiner presented the examination team's preliminary observations and findings on September 3, 2009, to Mr. F. Kearney, Site Vice-President, and other members of the Clinton Operations and Training Department staff.


Exit Meeting The acting chief examiner conducted an exit meeting by telephone on September 18, 2009, with Ms. K. Baker, Operations Training Manager and acting Training Director. The NRC
Exit Meeting The acting chief examiner conducted an exit meeting by telephone on September 18, 2009, with Ms. K. Baker, Operations Training Manager and acting Training Director. The NRC=s preliminary written examination results were provided to K. Baker during the telephone discussion. The examiners asked the licensee whether any of the material used to develop or administer the examination should be considered proprietary. No proprietary or sensitive information was identified during the examination or debrief/exit meetings.
=s preliminary written examination results were provided to K. Baker during the telephone discussion. The examiners asked the licensee whether any of the material used to develop or administer the examination should be considered proprietary. No proprietary or sensitive information was identified during the examination or debrief/exit meetings.


ATTACHMENT:
ATTACHMENT:  


=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=


1SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Enclosure 1
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee  
Licensee
: [[contact::F. Kearney]], Site Vice-President  
: [[contact::F. Kearney]], Site Vice-President
: [[contact::B. Bunte]], Sr. Manager Design Engineering  
: [[contact::B. Bunte]], Sr. Manager Design Engineering
: [[contact::T. Chalmers]], Operations Director  
: [[contact::T. Chalmers]], Operations Director
: [[contact::J. Ellis]], Work Management Director  
: [[contact::J. Ellis]], Work Management Director
: [[contact::R. Frantz]], Regulatory Assurance  
: [[contact::R. Frantz]], Regulatory Assurance
: [[contact::S. Gackstetter]], Training Director  
: [[contact::S. Gackstetter]], Training Director
: [[contact::D. Kemper]], Regulatory Assurance Manager  
: [[contact::D. Kemper]], Regulatory Assurance Manager
: [[contact::M. Otten]], Operations Training Manager  
: [[contact::M. Otten]], Operations Training Manager
: [[contact::A. Poland]], Human Resources Manager  
: [[contact::A. Poland]], Human Resources Manager
: [[contact::J. Rappeport]], Chemistry Manager  
: [[contact::J. Rappeport]], Chemistry Manager
: [[contact::M. Reandeau]], Shirt Operations Superintendent  
: [[contact::M. Reandeau]], Shirt Operations Superintendent
: [[contact::C. VanDenburgh]], Nuclear Oversight Manager
: [[contact::C. VanDenburgh]], Nuclear Oversight Manager
NRC  
NRC
: [[contact::M. Bielby]], Chief Examiner  
: [[contact::M. Bielby]], Chief Examiner
: [[contact::B. Kemker]], Clinton Senior Resident Inspector  
: [[contact::B. Kemker]], Clinton Senior Resident Inspector
: [[contact::C. Zoia]], Examiner
: [[contact::C. Zoia]], Examiner
ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
Opened, Closed, and Discussed
Opened, Closed, and Discussed
None
None
LIST OF ACRONYMS
LIST OF ACRONYMS
 
ADAMS           Agency-Wide Document Access and Management System
ADAMS Agency-Wide Document Access and Management System CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CFR             Code of Federal Regulations
DRS Division of Reactor Safety NRC U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission PARS Publicly Available Records System RO Reactor Operator
DRS             Division of Reactor Safety
SRO Senior Reactor Operator
NRC             U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
1SIMULATION FACILITY REPORT
PARS           Publicly Available Records System
Facility Licensee: Clinton Power Station, Unit 1
RO             Reactor Operator
Facility Licensee Docket No. 50-461  
SRO             Senior Reactor Operator
 
Attachment
Operating Tests Administered: August 24 through September 3, 2009
SIMULATION FACILITY REPORT
The following documents observations made by the NRC examination team during the initial operator license examination. These observations do not constitute audit or inspection findings and are not, without further verification and review, indicative of non-compliance with 10 CFR 55.45(b). These observations do not affect NRC certification or approval of the simulation facility other than to provide information which may be used in future evaluations. No licensee action is required in response to these observations.  
Facility Licensee: Clinton Power Station, Unit 1
 
Facility Licensee Docket No. 50-461
Operating Tests Administered: August 24 through September 3, 2009
The following documents observations made by the NRC examination team during the initial
operator license examination. These observations do not constitute audit or inspection findings
and are not, without further verification and review, indicative of non-compliance with
CFR 55.45(b). These observations do not affect NRC certification or approval of the
simulation facility other than to provide information which may be used in future evaluations.
No licensee action is required in response to these observations.
During the conduct of the simulator portion of the operating tests, the following items were
During the conduct of the simulator portion of the operating tests, the following items were
observed:
observed:
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ITEM                                         DESCRIPTION
During administration of an exam scenario, a malfunction required actuation of the main turbine hydrogen seal oil switch. A hardware problem prevented the
During administration of an exam scenario, a malfunction required actuation of
the main turbine hydrogen seal oil switch. A hardware problem prevented the
switch from functioning properly. As a result that specific malfunction was not
switch from functioning properly. As a result that specific malfunction was not
used in subsequent setups for that scenario.
used in subsequent setups for that scenario.
The Area/Process Radiation Monitoring Panel initially failed to reset properly between scenario setups. As a result the panel was left running rather than
The Area/Process Radiation Monitoring Panel initially failed to reset properly
between scenario setups. As a result the panel was left running rather than
resetting between scenarios. The remaining scenario evaluations were not
resetting between scenarios. The remaining scenario evaluations were not
affected.  
affected.
 
Enclosure 2
1WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS AND ANSWER KEYS (RO/SRO)
WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS AND ANSWER KEYS (RO/SRO)
RO/SRO Initial Examination ADAMS Accession #ML092940488.
RO/SRO Initial Examination ADAMS Accession #ML092940488.
C. Pardee     -2-
Enclosure 3
C. Pardee                                       -2-
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this examination.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this examination.
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
      /RA by B. Palagi for/
                                                /RA by B. Palagi for/
Hironori Peterson, Chief     Operations Branch     Division of Reactor Safety
Hironori Peterson, Chief
Docket No. 50-461 License No. NPF-62
Operations Branch
Enclosures: 1. Operator Licensing Examination
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-461
License No. NPF-62
Enclosures:       1. Operator Licensing Examination
Report 050000461/2009301(DRS)
Report 050000461/2009301(DRS)
2. Simulation Facility Report   3. Written Examinations and Answer Keys (RO and SRO)
2. Simulation Facility Report
cc w/encls 1 & 2: Distribution via ListServ  
3. Written Examinations and Answer Keys (RO and SRO)
 
cc w/encls 1 & 2:       Distribution via ListServ
cc w/encls 1, 2, & 3:  
cc w/encls 1, 2, & 3:  
: [[contact::S. Gackstetter]], Clinton Training Director
: [[contact::S. Gackstetter]], Clinton Training Director
DISTRIBUTION
: Susan Bagley
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource
RidsNrrPMClinton Resource
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Cynthia Pederson Steven Orth
Jared Heck
Allan Barker
Carole Ariano
Linda Linn
DRSIII DRPIII
Patricia Buckley
Tammy Tomczak
ROPreports Resource


DOCUMENT NAME:  G:\DRS\Work in Progress\CLI 2009 301 DRS OL.doc
Publicly Available  Non-Publicly Available        Sensitive          Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl  "N" = No copy
OFFICE RIII  RIII      NAME MBielby:co  CZ for HPeterson  BP for
DATE 10/22/09 10/22/09  OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:39, 21 December 2019

Er 05000461-09-301(DRS); 08/24/09 - 09/18/09; Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Clinton Power Station, Unit 1; Initial License Examination Report
ML093010227
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/22/2009
From: Hironori Peterson
Operations Branch III
To: Pardee C
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
References
50-461/09-301 50-461/09-301
Download: ML093010227 (10)


Text

ber 22, 2009

SUBJECT:

CLINTON POWER STATION NRC INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION REPORT 05000461/2009301(DRS)

Dear Mr. Pardee:

On September 18, 2009, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed the initial operator licensing examination process at your Clinton Power Station. The enclosed report presents the results of the examination which were discussed with Mr. F. Kearney and other members of your staff on September 3, 2009, and Ms. K. Baker on September 18, 2009.

The NRC examiners administered initial license examination operating tests from August 24 through September 3, 2009. Members of the Clinton Training Department administered the initial license written examination on September 4, 2009. Five reactor operator (RO) and two senior reactor operator (SRO) license examinations were administered. Two of the applicants were previously licensed ROs at the Clinton Power Station. The results of the examinations were finalized on October 15, 2009. All 13 applicants passed all sections of their examinations resulting in the issuance of one reactor operator and eight senior reactor operator licenses. Four reactor operator licenses were not issued pending determination of respective medical condition(s).

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this examination.

Sincerely,

/RA by B. Palagi for/

Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-461 License No. NPF-62

Enclosures:

1. Operator Licensing Examination Report 050000461/2009301(DRS)

2. Simulation Facility Report 3. Written Examinations and Answer Keys (RO and SRO)

REGION III==

Docket Nos: 50-461 License Nos: NPF-62 Report No: 05000461/2009301(DRS)

Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Facility: Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 Location: Clinton, IL Dates: August 24 through September 18, 2009 Examiners: M. Bielby, Chief Examiner C. Moore, Examiner C. Zoia, Examiner Approved by: Hironori Peterson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure 1

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

ER 05000461/2009301(DRS); 08/24/09 - 09/18/09; Exelon Generation Company, LLC;

Clinton Power Station, Unit 1; Initial License Examination Report.

The announced operator licensing initial examination was conducted by regional examiners in accordance with the guidance of NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 9, Supplement 1.

Examination Summary:

$ Thirteen examinations were administered (five-reactor operator and eight-senior reactor operator); and

$ All thirteen applicants passed all sections of their examinations resulting in the issuance of one reactor operator and eight senior reactor operator licenses. Four reactor operator licenses were not issued pending determination of respective medical condition(s).

REPORT DETAILS

OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)

4OA5 Other

.1 Initial Licensing Examinations

a. Examination Scope

The NRC examiners conducted an announced operator licensing initial examination during the weeks of August 24 and August 31, 2009. The facility licensees training staff used the guidance prescribed in NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 9, Supplement 1, to prepare the outline and develop the written examination and operating test. The examiners administered the operating test, consisting of job performance measures and dynamic simulator scenarios, during the period of August 24 through September 3, 2009. The facility licensee administered the written examination on September 4, 2009. Five reactor operator and eight senior reactor operator applicants were examined. During the on-site validation week of August 3, 2009, the examiners audited four license applications for accuracy.

b. Findings

Written Examination The NRC examiners determined that the written examination, as originally submitted by the licensee, was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.

All changes made to the submitted examination were made in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 1, Supplement 1. The licensee graded the written examination on September 4, 2009, and conducted a review of each question to determine the accuracy and validity of the examination questions. The licensee did not submit any post examination comments for consideration by the NRC examiners when grading the written examination or enhancements based on a post examination review with the applicants.

Operating Test The NRC examiners determined that the operating test, as originally submitted by the licensee, was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.

All changes made to the submitted examination were made in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,"

Revision 1, Supplement 1. The NRC examiners completed operating test grading on October 7, 2009.

Examination Results All thirteen applicants passed all sections of their examinations resulting in the issuance of one reactor operator and eight senior reactor operator licenses. Four reactor operator licenses were not issued pending determination of respective medical condition(s).

.2 Examination Security

a. Inspection Scope

The NRC examiners briefed the facility contact on the NRCs requirements and guidelines related to examination physical security (e.g., access restrictions and simulator considerations) and integrity in accordance with 10 CFR 55.49, Integrity of Examinations and Tests, and NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standard for Power Reactors, Revision 9, Supplement 1. The examiners reviewed and observed the licensees implementation and controls of examination security and integrity measures (e.g., security agreements) throughout the examination process.

b. Findings

No Findings

4OA6 Meetings

Debrief The chief examiner presented the examination team's preliminary observations and findings on September 3, 2009, to Mr. F. Kearney, Site Vice-President, and other members of the Clinton Operations and Training Department staff.

Exit Meeting The acting chief examiner conducted an exit meeting by telephone on September 18, 2009, with Ms. K. Baker, Operations Training Manager and acting Training Director. The NRC=s preliminary written examination results were provided to K. Baker during the telephone discussion. The examiners asked the licensee whether any of the material used to develop or administer the examination should be considered proprietary. No proprietary or sensitive information was identified during the examination or debrief/exit meetings.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Enclosure 1

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee

F. Kearney, Site Vice-President
B. Bunte, Sr. Manager Design Engineering
T. Chalmers, Operations Director
J. Ellis, Work Management Director
R. Frantz, Regulatory Assurance
S. Gackstetter, Training Director
D. Kemper, Regulatory Assurance Manager
M. Otten, Operations Training Manager
A. Poland, Human Resources Manager
J. Rappeport, Chemistry Manager
M. Reandeau, Shirt Operations Superintendent
C. VanDenburgh, Nuclear Oversight Manager

NRC

M. Bielby, Chief Examiner
B. Kemker, Clinton Senior Resident Inspector
C. Zoia, Examiner

ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

Opened, Closed, and Discussed

None

LIST OF ACRONYMS

ADAMS Agency-Wide Document Access and Management System

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

DRS Division of Reactor Safety

NRC U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

PARS Publicly Available Records System

RO Reactor Operator

SRO Senior Reactor Operator

Attachment

SIMULATION FACILITY REPORT

Facility Licensee: Clinton Power Station, Unit 1

Facility Licensee Docket No. 50-461

Operating Tests Administered: August 24 through September 3, 2009

The following documents observations made by the NRC examination team during the initial

operator license examination. These observations do not constitute audit or inspection findings

and are not, without further verification and review, indicative of non-compliance with

CFR 55.45(b). These observations do not affect NRC certification or approval of the

simulation facility other than to provide information which may be used in future evaluations.

No licensee action is required in response to these observations.

During the conduct of the simulator portion of the operating tests, the following items were

observed:

ITEM DESCRIPTION

During administration of an exam scenario, a malfunction required actuation of

the main turbine hydrogen seal oil switch. A hardware problem prevented the

switch from functioning properly. As a result that specific malfunction was not

used in subsequent setups for that scenario.

The Area/Process Radiation Monitoring Panel initially failed to reset properly

between scenario setups. As a result the panel was left running rather than

resetting between scenarios. The remaining scenario evaluations were not

affected.

Enclosure 2

WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS AND ANSWER KEYS (RO/SRO)

RO/SRO Initial Examination ADAMS Accession #ML092940488.

Enclosure 3

C. Pardee -2-

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this examination.

Sincerely,

/RA by B. Palagi for/

Hironori Peterson, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket No. 50-461

License No. NPF-62

Enclosures: 1. Operator Licensing Examination

Report 050000461/2009301(DRS)

2. Simulation Facility Report

3. Written Examinations and Answer Keys (RO and SRO)

cc w/encls 1 & 2: Distribution via ListServ

cc w/encls 1, 2, & 3:

S. Gackstetter, Clinton Training Director