ML060410062: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Chief, Rules and Directives Branch Division of Administrative Services Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,DC RE: page 1774 Federal Register/Vol.71,No.7/Wednesday, Januaryll,2006 As a longtime resident of Brattleboro,VT.
{{#Wiki_filter:Chief, Rules and Directives Branch Division of Administrative Services Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,DC RE: page 1774 Federal Register/Vol.71,No.7/Wednesday, Januaryll,2006 As a longtime resident of Brattleboro,VT. I strongly feel the proposed uprate of VT Yankee Nuclear Power Plant is much to dangerous and would be an extreme risk to the local community, as well as all the citizens of VT. I urge you to reconsider your findings.
I strongly feel the proposed uprate of VT Yankee Nuclear Power Plant is much to dangerous and would be an extreme risk to the local community, as well as all the citizens of VT. I urge you to reconsider your findings.I join the hundreds of Brattleboro residents who insist that this 34 year old plant must have an independent safety assessment, as a minimum precaution before supercharging the reactor.Sincerely, Martha Barnard 47 Deepwood Dr Brattleboro,VT.
I join the hundreds of Brattleboro residents who insist that this 34 year old plant must have an independent safety assessment, as a minimum precaution before supercharging the reactor.
T7--'D S 'S.- a .i:,^--me X Z 'O 9 -)}}
Sincerely, Martha Barnard 47 Deepwood Dr Brattleboro,VT.
                                                            'D     'SS T7    .-     a . i:,^--me
                                                                    --
X         Z' O     9       -)}}

Revision as of 22:29, 23 November 2019

2006/02/07-Comment (8) of Martha Barnard Opposing Proposed Uprate of VT Yankee Nuclear Power Plant
ML060410062
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 02/07/2006
From: Barnard M
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/ADM/DAS/RDB
References
%dam200606, 71FR1774 00008
Download: ML060410062 (1)


Text

Chief, Rules and Directives Branch Division of Administrative Services Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,DC RE: page 1774 Federal Register/Vol.71,No.7/Wednesday, Januaryll,2006 As a longtime resident of Brattleboro,VT. I strongly feel the proposed uprate of VT Yankee Nuclear Power Plant is much to dangerous and would be an extreme risk to the local community, as well as all the citizens of VT. I urge you to reconsider your findings.

I join the hundreds of Brattleboro residents who insist that this 34 year old plant must have an independent safety assessment, as a minimum precaution before supercharging the reactor.

Sincerely, Martha Barnard 47 Deepwood Dr Brattleboro,VT.

'D 'SS T7 .- a . i:,^--me

--

X Z' O 9 -)