ML063400442: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-ok8e f1 Final Status Survey Final Report Phase IV Appendix A7 Survey Unit Release Record 9106-0007, Discharge Canal November 2006 CYAPCO FINAL STATUS SURVEY RELEASE RECORD DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 Prepared By: Reviewed By: FýSS~gieer Date: Date:-FSS 1neer Approved B e p// /ýD Technical Support Manager Revision 0 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION  
{{#Wiki_filter:-ok8e f1 Final Status Survey Final Report Phase IV Appendix A7 Survey Unit Release Record 9106-0007, Discharge Canal November 2006
.................................................................
 
3 2. CLASSIFICATION BASIS ......................................................................
CYAPCO FINAL STATUS SURVEY RELEASE RECORD DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 Prepared By:                                 Date:
3 3. DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (DQO) ....................................................
FýSS~gieer Reviewed By:                                 Date:-
5 4. SURVEY DESIGN .....................................................................................
FSS 1neer Approved B                             e p//       /ýD Technical Support Manager Revision 0
8 5. SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION  
 
................................................................
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD TABLE OF CONTENTS
11 6. SURVEY RESULTS ...............................................................................
: 1. SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION ................................................................. 3
12 7. QUALITY CONTROL .............................................................................
: 2. CLASSIFICATION BASIS ...................................................................... 3
14 8. INVESTIGATIONS AND RESULTS ......................................................
: 3. DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (DQO) .................................................... 5
14 9. REMEDIATION AND RESULTS .............................................................
: 4. SURVEY DESIGN ..................................................................................... 8
14 10. CHANGES FROM THE FINAL STATUS SURVEY PLAN .....................
: 5. SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................ 11
14 11. DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT (DQA) .................................................
: 6. SURVEY RESULTS ............................................................................... 12
14 12. A NO M A LIES ...........................................................................................
: 7. QUALITY CONTROL ............................................................................. 14
15 13. CO NC LUSIO N .......................................................................................
: 8. INVESTIGATIONS AND RESULTS ...................................................... 14
15 14. ATTACHMENTS  
: 9. REMEDIATION AND RESULTS ............................................................. 14
.....................................................................................
: 10. CHANGES FROM THE FINAL STATUS SURVEY PLAN ..................... 14
16 14.1 Attachment 1 -Figures (6 pages including cover)14.2 Attachment 2 -Sample and Statistical Data (192 pages including covers)Revision 0 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION Survey Unit 9106-0007 (Discharge Canal) is designated as Final Status Survey (FSS) Class 2 and consists of approximately 8,692 m 2 (2.15 acres) of water covered sediment in an area located approximately 0.77 miles from the reference coordinate system benchmark used at the Haddam Neck Plant (HINP)(see Attachment 1, Figure 1). The Discharge Canal is a man-made mile long waterway that runs parallel to, and ultimately communicates with the Connecticut River. The Discharge Canal is subdivided into fifteen (15) survey units including two (2) permanent wetland areas for FSS purposes.
: 11. DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT (DQA) ................................................. 14
The survey unit is bounded as follows: Discharge Canal Survey Unit 9106-0006 is to the north (called north as orientated with the north to south flow of the Connecticut River), survey area 9521 is to the east, Discharge Canal Survey Unit 9106-0008 is to the south and Discharge Canal Survey Unit 9106-0013 is to the west. The survey unit comprises the canal sediments to the deeper of three (3) feet or the original construction depth and it extends up the canal banks to the mean high water level.A distinguishing feature of this Survey Unit is that it completely surrounds Class 1 survey unit 9106-0015.
: 12. A NO MA LIES ........................................................................................... 15
Survey Unit 9106-0015 was created in response to receiving a sample result (9106-0007-017F) which exceeded the design limits for a class 2 Survey Unit. The design changes made to accommodate the removal of this 1,170 m 2 area from the initial design for Survey Unit 9106-0007 is discussed in section 4.This survey unit is bounded by reference coordinates E026 through E032 by S122 through S140 (refer to License Termination Plan Section 5.4.4). The reference coordinates provide the maximum dimensions of a rectangle containing this survey unit. Some areas contained in this rectangle may not be part of this survey unit. The boundary of the survey unit was defined using a Global Positioning System (GPS) based on the Connecticut State Plane System North American Datum (NAD) 1927.2. CLASSIFICATION BASIS The survey unit was classified in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-10,"Survey Unit Classification. " The historical information, scoping analyses and characterization results provided sufficient data to designate Survey Unit 9106-0007 as Class 2 in May 2006.The "Classification Basis Summary" conducted for this survey unit consisted of: a) A review of the 10CFR50.75 (g) (1) database, b) A review of the "Initial Characterization Report" and the "Historic Site Assessment (HSA) Supplement, " c) Historic and current survey records review, d) Visual inspections and a "walkdown." Revision 0 3 Revision 0 3 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD e) Formal or informal interviews with cognizant personnel.
: 13. CO NC LUSIO N ....................................................................................... 15
A review of the 1OCFR50.75(g)(1) database report identified a number of events that may have impacted this survey unit. In 1986, samples of the 1979 dredge spoils area and canal sediment were taken. The sample analyses indicated that the concentrations of Cs-137, Co-60 and other radionuclides were a small fraction of the DCGL for those nuclides that could be identified by gamma spectroscopy. (refer to NE-86-RA-1142 dated 11-13-86).
: 14. ATTACHMENTS ..................................................................................... 16 14.1 Attachment 1 - Figures (6 pages including cover) 14.2 Attachment 2 - Sample and Statistical Data (192 pages including covers)
None the available information indicates that the residual activity present is likely to be above the DCGL for the area.Additional information was provided by several historical documents, including the "Results of Scoping Survey", (completed 9/1/98), the "Historical Site Assessment", and the HSA Supplement (dated 6-30-00).
Revision 0
These documents presented the results of several sediment samples taken in 1997. These sample results indicated concentrations of 0.5 pCi/g for Co-60, 0.024pCi/g for Cs-134 and 0.722 pCi/g for Cs-137.An initial characterization survey was implemented during April and May of 2004. Six (6) samples from three (3) locations were obtained by biased sampling throughout the area. The samples were analyzed off-site by gamma spectroscopy and with radiochemical analyses for Sr-90 and Tritium. Hard-to-Detect analyses were also conducted on one (1) of the six (6) samples. The only plant-related dosimetrically significant radionuclides identified in the samples were Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90. No samples indicated radioactive material in quantities above the ten (10) mrem/yr design DCGL. Co-60 accounted for the majority of the dose in these samples with a maximum concentration of 0.44 pCi/g.A final characterization was performed by Site Closure personnel in April of 2006. Six (6) sediment samples from six (6) locations were taken. All of the samples were analyzed by gamma spectroscopy.
 
Based on the initial and final characterization results, the radionuclides of concern identified in the sample data for FSS planning purposes were Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90. Since HTD analyses were not performed for all radionuclides of interest during characterization, additional HTD analyses were performed as a part of the FSS.The statistics for each of the radionuclides of concern are listed in Table 1.Revision 0 4 Revision 0 4 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Table 1 -Basic Statistical Quantities for Cs-137,,Co-6)0 and Sr-90 fromn thle tharacterizaition SurveyýMinimum Value: -8.61E-02 2.15E-03 2.44E-02 Maximum Value: 5.3 8E-01 4.36E-01 5.25E-02 Mean: 1.84E-01 1.35E-01 3.61E-02 Median: 1.79E-01 7.32E-02 3.55E-02 Standard Deviation:
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION Survey Unit 9106-0007 (Discharge Canal) is designated as Final Status Survey (FSS) Class 2 and consists of approximately 8,692 m2 (2.15 acres) of water covered sediment in an area located approximately 0.77 miles from the reference coordinate system benchmark used at the Haddam Neck Plant (HINP)
2.27E-01 1.68E-01 1.10E-02 NOTE: The Operational DCGLs are 6.01 pCi/g for Cs-137, 2.90 pCi/g for Co-60 and 1.18 for Sr-90; these are used in conjunction with the unity rule to achieve 19 mrem/yr TEDE The FSS Engineer performed a visual inspection and walkdown during May 2006 to assess the physical condition of the survey unit, evaluate access points and travel paths and identify potentially hazardous conditions.
(see Attachment 1, Figure 1). The Discharge Canal is a man-made mile long waterway that runs parallel to, and ultimately communicates with the Connecticut River. The Discharge Canal is subdivided into fifteen (15) survey units including two (2) permanent wetland areas for FSS purposes. The survey unit is bounded as follows: Discharge Canal Survey Unit 9106-0006 is to the north (called north as orientated with the north to south flow of the Connecticut River), survey area 9521 is to the east, Discharge Canal Survey Unit 9106-0008 is to the south and Discharge Canal Survey Unit 9106-0013 is to the west. The survey unit comprises the canal sediments to the deeper of three (3) feet or the original construction depth and it extends up the canal banks to the mean high water level.
Based upon the historical information and the results of radiological surveys performed during characterization, it was concluded that there was a low probability for residual radioactivity to be present in this survey unit in concentrations greater than the Operational DCGLs justifying a final survey unit classification of Class 2 (refer to Section 3).3. DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (DQO)FSS design and planning is based on the Data Quality Objective (DQO) process as described by the LTP, Procedure RPM 5.1-11, "Preparation of Final Status Survey Plan, " and the "Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual" (MARSSIM).
A distinguishing feature of this Survey Unit is that it completely surrounds Class 1 survey unit 9106-0015. Survey Unit 9106-0015 was created in response to receiving a sample result (9106-0007-017F) which exceeded the design limits for a class 2 Survey Unit. The design changes made to accommodate the removal of this 1,170 m 2 area from the initial design for Survey Unit 9106-0007 is discussed in section 4.
A summary of the main features of the DQO process are provided herein.The DQO process incorporates hypothesis testing and probabilistic sampling distributions to control decision errors during data analysis.
This survey unit is bounded by reference coordinates E026 through E032 by S122 through S140 (refer to License Termination Plan Section 5.4.4). The reference coordinates provide the maximum dimensions of a rectangle containing this survey unit. Some areas contained in this rectangle may not be part of this survey unit. The boundary of the survey unit was defined using a Global Positioning System (GPS) based on the Connecticut State Plane System North American Datum (NAD) 1927.
Hypothesis testing is a process based on the scientific method that compares a baseline condition to an alternate condition.
: 2. CLASSIFICATION BASIS The survey unit was classified in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-10, "Survey Unit Classification." The historical information, scoping analyses and characterization results provided sufficient data to designate Survey Unit 9106-0007 as Class 2 in May 2006.
The baseline condition is technically known as the null hypothesis.
The "Classification Basis Summary" conducted for this survey unit consisted of:
Hypothesis testing rests on the premise that the null hypothesis is true and that sufficient evidence must be provided for rejection.
a) A review of the 10CFR50.75 (g) (1) database, b) A review of the "InitialCharacterizationReport" and the "HistoricSite Assessment (HSA) Supplement, "
In designing the survey plan, the underlying assumption, or null hypothesis was that residual activity in the survey unit exceeded the release criteria.
c) Historic and current survey records review, d) Visual inspections and a "walkdown."
Rejection of the null hypothesis would satisfy the release criteria objective of the FSS.The primary objective of the Final Status Survey Plan (FSSP) was to demonstrate that the level of residual radioactivity in Survey Unit 9106-0007 did not exceed the release criteria specified in the LTP and that the potential Revision 0 5 Revision 0 5 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD dose from residual radioactivity is As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA).A fundamental precursor to survey design is to establish a relationship between the release criteria and some measurable quantity.
Revision 0                                     3 Revision 0                                     3
This is done through the development of Derived Concentration Guideline Levels (DCGLs). The DCGLs represent the concentration of radioactivity above background, equivalent to a dose-based release criterion and is presented in terms of surface or mass activity concentrations.
 
Chapter 6 of the LTP describes in detail the modeling used to develop the DCGLs for soil (called Base Case Soil DCGL), for existing groundwater radioactivity and for future groundwater radioactivity that will be contributed by building foundations and footings.As described in detail in the LTP, the dose model applied to the discharge canal presumes that the canal sediments are dredged to a depth of three (3) feet below the top of the sediment layer and spread for the planting of crops per the Resident Farmer Scenario.
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD e) Formal or informal interviews with cognizant personnel.
Consequently, the soil DCGLs are directly applied to the canal sediment media.The DCGLs presented in Chapter 6 of the LTP were developed for exposures from three (3) components, that is, residual radioactivity in soil, existing groundwater radioactivity, and future groundwater radioactivity from the burial of concrete foundations or footings from site buildings containing residual radioactivity.
A review of the 10CFR50.75(g)(1) database report identified a number of events that may have impacted this survey unit. In 1986, samples of the 1979 dredge spoils area and canal sediment were taken. The sample analyses indicated that the concentrations of Cs-137, Co-60 and other radionuclides were a small fraction of the DCGL for those nuclides that could be identified by gamma spectroscopy. (refer to NE-86-RA-1142 dated 11-13-86). None the available information indicates that the residual activity present is likely to be above the DCGL for the area.
Equation 1 shows the mathematical relationship between the three (3) components and the total dose.Equation 1.HTotal=Hsoil (sediment)  
Additional information was provided by several historical documents, including the "Results of Scoping Survey", (completed 9/1/98), the "Historical Site Assessment", and the HSA Supplement (dated 6-30-00). These documents presented the results of several sediment samples taken in 1997. These sample results indicated concentrations of 0.5 pCi/g for Co-60, 0.024pCi/g for Cs-134 and 0.722 pCi/g for Cs-137.
+ HExisting GW + HFuture GW The total dose under the LTP criteria is twenty-five (25) mrem/yr TEDE from all three components.
An initial characterization survey was implemented during April and May of 2004. Six (6) samples from three (3) locations were obtained by biased sampling throughout the area. The samples were analyzed off-site by gamma spectroscopy and with radiochemical analyses for Sr-90 and Tritium. Hard-to-Detect analyses were also conducted on one (1) of the six (6) samples. The only plant-related dosimetrically significant radionuclides identified in the samples were Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90. No samples indicated radioactive material in quantities above the ten (10) mrem/yr design DCGL. Co-60 accounted for the majority of the dose in these samples with a maximum concentration of 0.44 pCi/g.
The allowable total dose under the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) radiological remediation standard for Connecticut Yankee (CY) is nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE. To satisfy both the LTP and CY CTDEP criteria, the dose from soil must be reduced when using the existing and future groundwater dose values discussed above.This survey unit is not affected by either existing or future groundwater (reference CY memo ISC 06-024). Therefore, dose contribution from both groundwater components is zero (0) mrem/yr TEDE, based on field data.Equation 2: 19 mrern/yrTotal=
A final characterization was performed by Site Closure personnel in April of 2006. Six (6) sediment samples from six (6) locations were taken. All of the samples were analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. Based on the initial and final characterization results, the radionuclides of concern identified in the sample data for FSS planning purposes were Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90. Since HTD analyses were not performed for all radionuclides of interest during characterization, additional HTD analyses were performed as a part of the FSS.
19 mrem/yrsoil+0 mrem/yrExisting GW+O mrem/yrFuture GW The allowable dose for soil in this survey unit is nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE as shown by Equation 2 above. The concentration of residual radioactivity Revision 0 6 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD resulting in nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE is designated as the Operational DCGL, and has been established for the radionuclides of concern as provided in Table 2.Note: The survey design used a much smaller value for investigation than the Operational DCGL provided by Table 2 to conservatively account for the contribution to the total dose from existing and future groundwater which had not been established at the time of planning the FSS.T~able 2 -Radionuclide Specific ~Base Cs olD';, prtoa C~and Required Minimumn Detectable Concentrations, Radionuclide ( Base Case Soil Operational DML, Reqnihred MDC-H-3 4.12E+02 3.13E+02 1.65E+01 C-14 5.66E+00 4.30E+00 2.26E-01 Mn-54 1.74E+01 1.32E+01 6.96E-0I Fe-55 2.74E+04 2.08E+04 1.1 OE+03 Co-60 3.8 1 E+00 2.90E+00 1.52E-01 Ni-63 7.23E+02 5.49E+02 2.89E+OI Sr-90 1.55E+00 1.18E+00 6.20E-02 Nb-94 7.12E+00 5.41E+00 2.85E-01 Tc-99 1.26E+01 9.58E+00 5.04E-0I Ag-108m 7.14E+00 5.43E+00 2.86E-0I Cs-134 4.67E+00 3.55E+00 1.87E-01 Cs-137 7.91E+00 6.01E+00 3.16E-0I Eu-152 1.01E+O1 7.68E+00 4.04E-0I Eu-154 9.29E+00 7.06E+00 3.72E-01 Eu-155 3.92E+02 2.98E+02 1.57E+01 Pu-238 2.96E+OI 2.25E+01 1.1 8E+00 Pu-239/240 2.67E+O I 2.03E+01 1.07E+00 Pu-241 8.70E+02 6.61 E+02 3.48E+O1 Am-241 () 2.58E+O1 1.96E+01 1.03E+00 Cm-243/244 2.90E+O1 2.20E+O1 1.16E+00 (1) Bold indicates those radionuclides considered to be Hard to Detect (HTD)(2) The Base Case Soil DCGLs for soil are specified by the LTP in Chapter 6 and are equivalent to twenty-five (25) mrem/yr TEDE (3) The Operational DCGL is equivalent to nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE (4) The required MDC is equivalent to one (1) mrem/yr TEDE (5) Americium-241 can be analyzed by gamma and alpha spectroscopy and is considered to be Easy to Detect (ETD). The preferred result is the alpha spectroscopy's when both analyses are performed.
The statistics for each of the radionuclides of concern are listed in Table 1.
Revision 0 7 Revision 0 7 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Another important facet of the DQO process is to identify the radionuclides of concern and determine the concentration variability.
Revision 0                                       4 Revision 0                                       4
Initial characterization was performed in April of 2004 as discussed in Section 2. Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90 were found to be the predominate radionuclides of concern. The basic statistical quantities (i.e., mean, standard deviation, median) for Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90 are provided in Table 1.As part of the DQOs applied to laboratory processes, analysis results were reported as actual calculated results. Results reported as less than Minimum Detectable Concentration
 
(<MDC) were not accepted for FSS. Sample report summaries included unique sample identification, analytical method, radionuclide, result, and uncertainty to two (2) standard deviations, laboratory data qualifiers, units, and the required and observed MDC.4. SURVEY DESIGN The level of effort associated with planning a survey is based on the complexity of the survey and nature of the hazards. Guidance for preparing FSS plans is provided in Procedure RPM 5.1-11, "Preparation of Final Status Survey Plans ".This survey was initially designed to ten (10) mrem/yr TEDE. At the time when the survey was designed, the dose contribution for existing and future groundwater had not yet been determined.
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Table 1 - Basic Statistical Quantities for Cs-137,,Co-6)0 and Sr-90 fromn thle tharacterizaition Survey&#xfd; Minimum Value:                 -8.61E-02           2.15E-03             2.44E-02 Maximum Value:                   5.3 8E-01           4.36E-01             5.25E-02 Mean:                     1.84E-01           1.35E-01             3.61E-02 Median:                   1.79E-01           7.32E-02             3.55E-02 Standard Deviation:             2.27E-01             1.68E-01             1.10E-02 NOTE: The Operational DCGLs are 6.01 pCi/g for Cs-137, 2.90 pCi/g for Co-60 and 1.18 for Sr-90; these are used in conjunction with the unity rule to achieve 19 mrem/yr TEDE The FSS Engineer performed a visual inspection and walkdown during May 2006 to assess the physical condition of the survey unit, evaluate access points and travel paths and identify potentially hazardous conditions.
Subsequently, a conservative value was chosen for the Operational DCGL. This approach is no longer required as the total dose from existing and future groundwater has been established.
Based upon the historical information and the results of radiological surveys performed during characterization, it was concluded that there was a low probability for residual radioactivity to be present in this survey unit in concentrations greater than the Operational DCGLs justifying a final survey unit classification of Class 2 (refer to Section 3).
The dose for soil used for this survey unit to demonstrate compliance with the LTP criteria is nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE, as discussed in Section 2 of this Release Record.The DQO process determined that Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90 were the radionuclides of concern (refer to Section 3). The sum of fractions or unity rule was used with the individual Operational DCGLs because multiple radionuclides (Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90) were considered in the survey design.Surrogate DCGLs were not required for this survey unit based on process knowledge from FSS of nearby adjacent areas and via screening process described in LTP Section 5.4.7.2, "Gross Activity DCGLs". Sr-90 concentrations in sediment and soil were ascertained by direct analysis.The Elevated Measurement Comparison (EMC) did not apply to this survey unit since the survey unit is a Class 2 and discrete, elevated areas of contamination were not expected.The Sign Test was selected as the non-parametric statistical test to demonstrate that the null hypothesis was rejected.
: 3. DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (DQO)
The use of the Sign Test did not require the selection or use of a background reference area, which simplified survey design and implementation.
FSS design and planning is based on the Data Quality Objective (DQO) process as described by the LTP, Procedure RPM 5.1-11, "Preparationof FinalStatus Survey Plan," and the "Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual" (MARSSIM). A summary of the main features of the DQO process are provided herein.
In addition, this approach is conservative since it includes background Cs- 137 as part of the sample set.Revision 0 8 Revision 0 8 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD The number of soil samples for FSS was determined in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-12, "Determination of the Number of Samples for Final Status Survey. " The Lower Bound of the Gray Region (LBGR) was set in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-11 to 0.735 to maintain the relative shift (A/G) in the range of 1 and 3. The resulting relative shift was 2.0. A Prospective Power Curve was generated using COMPASS, a software package developed under the sponsorship of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) for implementation of the MARSSIM in support of the decommissioning license termination rule (10 CFR 20, Subpart E). The result of the COMPASS computer run showed adequate power for the survey design.This indicates that the survey unit has a high probability of rejecting the null hypothesis, assuming that the characterization data are representative of the FSS results. Survey design specified fifteen (15) sediment core samples for non-parametric statistical testing.The grid pattern and locations of the soil samples were determined using Visual Sample Plan (VSP) in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-14, "Identifying, and Marking Surface Sample Locations for Final Status Survey. " Visual Sample Plan was created by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) for the United States Department of Energy. A systematic triangular grid pattern with a random starting point was selected for sample design, which is appropriate for a Class 2 area.Judgmental sampling was included as a feature of this survey design to account for any anomalies potentially identified in the field.Sample locations were identified using AutoCAD-LT, a commercially available plotting software package with coordinates consistent with the Connecticut State Plane System. These coordinates were integrated with a GPS to locate sample locations in the field. Sample Measurement Locations for the design are listed with the GPS coordinates in Table 3.Revision 0 9 Revision 0 9 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Twtable 3 -Sample Measurement Locations with ssoiated GPS Coordinates D~esignationi  
The DQO process incorporates hypothesis testing and probabilistic sampling distributions to control decision errors during data analysis. Hypothesis testing is a process based on the scientific method that compares a baseline condition to an alternate condition. The baseline condition is technically known as the null hypothesis. Hypothesis testing rests on the premise that the null hypothesis is true and that sufficient evidence must be provided for rejection. In designing the survey plan, the underlying assumption, or null hypothesis was that residual activity in the survey unit exceeded the release criteria. Rejection of the null hypothesis would satisfy the release criteria objective of the FSS.
"> Northing,&#xfd;;
The primary objective of the Final Status Survey Plan (FSSP) was to demonstrate that the level of residual radioactivity in Survey Unit 9106-0007 did not exceed the release criteria specified in the LTP and that the potential Revision 0                                           5 Revision 0                                           5
Easting<1>9106-0007-001F 235298.00 672291.87 9106-0007-002F 235219.74 672246.68 9106-0007-003F 235219.74 672337.05 9106-0007-004F 235141.48 672291.87 9106-0007-005F 235141.48 672382.24 9106-0007-007F 235063.21 672427.42 9106-0007-01 IF 234984.95 672562.98 9106-0007-012F 234984.95 672653.35 9106-0007-013F 234906.69 672608.17 9106-0007-014F 234906.69 672698.54 9106-0007-015F 234828.42 672653.35 9106-0007-018F 235215.38 672389.46 9106-0007-019F 235001.08 672542.82 9106-0007-020F 234942.33 672625.39 9106-0007-021F 235106.22 672362.88 The sample location designations of Table 3 are not sequential due to changes made as a result of carving out Survey Unit 9106-0015 from the interior of this survey unit, and the relocation of samples due to accessibility of sample locations.
 
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD dose from residual radioactivity is As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA).
A fundamental precursor to survey design is to establish a relationship between the release criteria and some measurable quantity. This is done through the development of Derived Concentration Guideline Levels (DCGLs).               The DCGLs represent the concentration of radioactivity above background, equivalent to a dose-based release criterion and is presented in terms of surface or mass activity concentrations. Chapter 6 of the LTP describes in detail the modeling used to develop the DCGLs for soil (called Base Case Soil DCGL),
for existing groundwater radioactivity and for future groundwater radioactivity that will be contributed by building foundations and footings.
As described in detail in the LTP, the dose model applied to the discharge canal presumes that the canal sediments are dredged to a depth of three (3) feet below the top of the sediment layer and spread for the planting of crops per the Resident Farmer Scenario. Consequently, the soil DCGLs are directly applied to the canal sediment media.
The DCGLs presented in Chapter 6 of the LTP were developed for exposures from three (3) components, that is, residual radioactivity in soil, existing groundwater radioactivity, and future groundwater radioactivity from the burial of concrete foundations or footings from site buildings containing residual radioactivity. Equation 1 shows the mathematical relationship between the three (3) components and the total dose.
Equation 1.
HTotal=Hsoil (sediment) + HExisting GW + HFuture GW The total dose under the LTP criteria is twenty-five (25) mrem/yr TEDE from all three components. The allowable total dose under the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) radiological remediation standard for Connecticut Yankee (CY) is nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE. To satisfy both the LTP and CY CTDEP criteria, the dose from soil must be reduced when using the existing and future groundwater dose values discussed above.
This survey unit is not affected by either existing or future groundwater (reference CY memo ISC 06-024). Therefore, dose contribution from both groundwater components is zero (0) mrem/yr TEDE, based on field data.
Equation 2:
19 mrern/yrTotal= 19 mrem/yrsoil+0 mrem/yrExisting GW+O mrem/yrFuture GW The allowable dose for soil in this survey unit is nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE as shown by Equation 2 above. The concentration of residual radioactivity Revision 0                                       6
 
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD resulting in nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE is designated as the Operational DCGL, and has been established for the radionuclides of concern as provided in Table 2.
Note: The survey design used a much smaller value for investigation than the Operational DCGL provided by Table 2 to conservatively account for the contribution to the total dose from existing and future groundwater which had not been established at the time of planning the FSS.
T~able 2 - Radionuclide Specific ~Base Cs olD';,                 prtoa         C~
and Required Minimumn Detectable Concentrations, Radionuclide     (     Base Case Soil       Operational DML,           Reqnihred MDC-H-3                 4.12E+02                 3.13E+02               1.65E+01 C-14                 5.66E+00                 4.30E+00               2.26E-01 Mn-54                 1.74E+01                 1.32E+01               6.96E-0I Fe-55               2.74E+04                 2.08E+04               1.1 OE+03 Co-60               3.8 1 E+00               2.90E+00                 1.52E-01 Ni-63               7.23E+02                 5.49E+02               2.89E+OI Sr-90               1.55E+00                 1.18E+00               6.20E-02 Nb-94                 7.12E+00                 5.41E+00               2.85E-01 Tc-99               1.26E+01                 9.58E+00               5.04E-0I Ag-108m               7.14E+00                 5.43E+00               2.86E-0I Cs-134               4.67E+00                 3.55E+00                 1.87E-01 Cs-137               7.91E+00                 6.01E+00               3.16E-0I Eu-152               1.01E+O1                 7.68E+00               4.04E-0I Eu-154               9.29E+00                 7.06E+00               3.72E-01 Eu-155               3.92E+02                 2.98E+02               1.57E+01 Pu-238               2.96E+OI                 2.25E+01               1.1 8E+00 Pu-239/240             2.67E+O I               2.03E+01               1.07E+00 Pu-241               8.70E+02                 6.61 E+02               3.48E+O1 Am-241   ()           2.58E+O1                 1.96E+01               1.03E+00 Cm-243/244               2.90E+O1                 2.20E+O1               1.16E+00 (1) Bold indicates those radionuclides considered to be Hard to Detect (HTD)
(2) The Base Case Soil DCGLs for soil are specified by the LTP in Chapter 6 and are equivalent to twenty-five (25) mrem/yr TEDE (3) The Operational DCGL is equivalent to nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE (4) The required MDC is equivalent to one (1) mrem/yr TEDE (5) Americium-241 can be analyzed by gamma and alpha spectroscopy and is considered to be Easy to Detect (ETD). The preferred result is the alpha spectroscopy's when both analyses are performed.
Revision 0                                         7 Revision 0                                         7
 
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Another important facet of the DQO process is to identify the radionuclides of concern and determine the concentration variability. Initial characterization was performed in April of 2004 as discussed in Section 2. Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90 were found to be the predominate radionuclides of concern.               The basic statistical quantities (i.e., mean, standard deviation, median) for Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90 are provided in Table 1.
As part of the DQOs applied to laboratory processes, analysis results were reported as actual calculated results. Results reported as less than Minimum Detectable Concentration (<MDC) were not accepted for FSS. Sample report summaries included unique sample identification, analytical method, radionuclide, result, and uncertainty to two (2) standard deviations, laboratory data qualifiers, units, and the required and observed MDC.
: 4. SURVEY DESIGN The level of effort associated with planning a survey is based on the complexity of the survey and nature of the hazards. Guidance for preparing FSS plans is provided in Procedure RPM 5.1-11, "Preparation of Final Status Survey Plans ".
This survey was initially designed to ten (10) mrem/yr TEDE. At the time when the survey was designed, the dose contribution for existing and future groundwater had not yet been determined. Subsequently, a conservative value was chosen for the Operational DCGL. This approach is no longer required as the total dose from existing and future groundwater has been established. The dose for soil used for this survey unit to demonstrate compliance with the LTP criteria is nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE, as discussed in Section 2 of this Release Record.
The DQO process determined that Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90 were the radionuclides of concern (refer to Section 3). The sum of fractions or unity rule was used with the individual Operational DCGLs because multiple radionuclides (Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90) were considered in the survey design.
Surrogate DCGLs were not required for this survey unit based on process knowledge from FSS of nearby adjacent areas and via screening process described in LTP Section 5.4.7.2, "Gross Activity DCGLs".                   Sr-90 concentrations in sediment and soil were ascertained by direct analysis.
The Elevated Measurement Comparison (EMC) did not apply to this survey unit since the survey unit is a Class 2 and discrete, elevated areas of contamination were not expected.
The Sign Test was selected as the non-parametric statistical test to demonstrate that the null hypothesis was rejected. The use of the Sign Test did not require the selection or use of a background reference area, which simplified survey design and implementation. In addition, this approach is conservative since it includes background Cs- 137 as part of the sample set.
Revision 0                                     8 Revision 0                                     8
 
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD The number of soil samples for FSS was determined in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-12, "Determination of the Number of Samples for Final Status Survey. " The Lower Bound of the Gray Region (LBGR) was set in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-11 to 0.735 to maintain the relative shift (A/G) in the range of 1 and 3. The resulting relative shift was 2.0. A Prospective Power Curve was generated using COMPASS, a software package developed under the sponsorship of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) for implementation of the MARSSIM in support of the decommissioning license termination rule (10 CFR 20, Subpart E). The result of the COMPASS computer run showed adequate power for the survey design.
This indicates that the survey unit has a high probability of rejecting the null hypothesis, assuming that the characterization data are representative of the FSS results. Survey design specified fifteen (15) sediment core samples for non-parametric statistical testing.
The grid pattern and locations of the soil samples were determined using Visual Sample Plan (VSP) in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-14, "Identifying, and Marking Surface Sample Locations for Final Status Survey. " Visual Sample Plan was created by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) for the United States Department of Energy. A systematic triangular grid pattern with a random starting point was selected for sample design, which is appropriate for a Class 2 area.
Judgmental sampling was included as a feature of this survey design to account for any anomalies potentially identified in the field.
Sample locations were identified using AutoCAD-LT, a commercially available plotting software package with coordinates consistent with the Connecticut State Plane System. These coordinates were integrated with a GPS to locate sample locations in the field. Sample Measurement Locations for the design are listed with the GPS coordinates in Table 3.
Revision 0                                     9 Revision 0                                     9
 
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Twtable 3 -Sample Measurement Locations with     ssoiated GPS Coordinates D~esignationi   ">         Northing,&#xfd;;             Easting<1 >
9106-0007-001F                 235298.00             672291.87 9106-0007-002F                 235219.74             672246.68 9106-0007-003F                 235219.74             672337.05 9106-0007-004F                 235141.48             672291.87 9106-0007-005F                 235141.48             672382.24 9106-0007-007F                 235063.21             672427.42 9106-0007-01 IF                 234984.95             672562.98 9106-0007-012F                 234984.95             672653.35 9106-0007-013F                 234906.69             672608.17 9106-0007-014F                 234906.69             672698.54 9106-0007-015F                 234828.42             672653.35 9106-0007-018F                 235215.38             672389.46 9106-0007-019F                 235001.08             672542.82 9106-0007-020F                 234942.33             672625.39 9106-0007-021F                 235106.22             672362.88 The sample location designations of Table 3 are not sequential due to changes made as a result of carving out Survey Unit 9106-0015 from the interior of this survey unit, and the relocation of samples due to accessibility of sample locations.
Samples locations 9106-0007-009F and 9106-0007-OIOF were found to be on dry land, consequently, they were randomly relocated using the VSP software to two (2) new locations designated as 9106-0007-016F and 9106-0007-017F.
Samples locations 9106-0007-009F and 9106-0007-OIOF were found to be on dry land, consequently, they were randomly relocated using the VSP software to two (2) new locations designated as 9106-0007-016F and 9106-0007-017F.
When the sample result for 9106-0007-017F was received from the off-site laboratory, it was determined that the sample exceeded the Operational DCGL of nineteen (19) mrem/yr (the sample's activity was equivalent to 22.4 mrem/yr).
When the sample result for 9106-0007-017F was received from the off-site laboratory, it was determined that the sample exceeded the Operational DCGL of nineteen (19) mrem/yr (the sample's activity was equivalent to 22.4 mrem/yr). Since sample results cannot exceed the DCGL in a Class 2 area, an approximately the FSS design square     rectangle of 1,170 m2 was removed from the footprint of for Survey   Unit 9106-0007.
Since sample results cannot exceed the DCGL in a Class 2 area, an approximately square rectangle of 1,170 m2 was removed from the footprint of the FSS design for Survey Unit 9106-0007.
A consequence of removing Survey Unit 9106-0015 from Survey Unit 9106-0007 was that four (4) sample locations were now located outside the boundary of Survey Unit 9106-0007, and needed to be relocated. The samples locations were relocated using randomly generated locations from the VSP software. The four locations removed from the FSS survey were locations 9106-0007-006F, 008F, 016F and 017F. These were replaced with sample locations 9106-0007-018F through 9106-0007-02 1F.
A consequence of removing Survey Unit 9106-0015 from Survey Unit 9106-0007 was that four (4) sample locations were now located outside the boundary of Survey Unit 9106-0007, and needed to be relocated.
Four (4) sediment samples were analyzed for the full suite of radionuclides specified in Table 1, exceeding the requirement to analyze 5% of the sample population for HTD analysis specified in procedure RPM 5.1-11. Two (2) of the four (4) samples were randomly selected using the Microsoft Excel Revision 0                                   10 Revision 0                                 10
The samples locations were relocated using randomly generated locations from the VSP software.
 
The four locations removed from the FSS survey were locations 9106-0007-006F, 008F, 016F and 017F. These were replaced with sample locations 9106-0007-018F through 9106-0007-02 1F.Four (4) sediment samples were analyzed for the full suite of radionuclides specified in Table 1, exceeding the requirement to analyze 5% of the sample population for HTD analysis specified in procedure RPM 5.1-11. Two (2) of the four (4) samples were randomly selected using the Microsoft Excel Revision 0 10 Revision 0 10 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD"RAND" function.
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD "RAND" function. The two (2) samples exhibiting the highest observed radionuclide concentrations by gamma analyses were also selected.
The two (2) samples exhibiting the highest observed radionuclide concentrations by gamma analyses were also selected.The implementation of survey specific quality control measures as referenced by Procedure RPM 5.1-24, "Split Sample Assessment for Final Status Survey, " included the collection of two (2) soil samples for "split sample" analysis by the off-site laboratory.
The implementation of survey specific quality control measures as referenced by Procedure RPM 5.1-24, "Split Sample Assessment for Final Status Survey, "
These locations were selected randomly using the Microsoft Excel "RAND" function.
included the collection of two (2) soil samples for "split sample" analysis by the off-site laboratory. These locations were selected randomly using the Microsoft Excel "RAND" function. The number of quality control samples exceeded the 5% requirement.
The number of quality control samples exceeded the 5% requirement.
The LTP specifies that scanning is not required for the FSS of the Discharge Canal. Table 4 provides a synopsis of the survey design.
The LTP specifies that scanning is not required for the FSS of the Discharge Canal. Table 4 provides a synopsis of the survey design.Table 4 -Synopsis of IheScie-,'nr  
Table 4 -Synopsis of IheScie-,'nr &#xfd;Iesiyn&#xb6;')
&#xfd;Iesiyn&#xb6;')
Feature~~           Design Criteria                 ~Basi Survey Unit Land               8,692 m 2             Based on AutoCAD-LT and Visual Area                                               Sample Plan calculations Type I and Type 2 errors were 0.05, Number of                     15               sigma was 0.133 the LBGR was set to Measurements                                     0.735 to maintain Relative Shift in the range of I and 3, Relative Shift was 2.0 Grid Spacing(2)               27.6 m                     Based on triangular grid 3.16 pCi/g Cs-137 Design DCGL             1.52 pCi/g Co-60         To achieve ten (10) mrem/yr TEDE 0.62 pCi/g Sr-90 6.01 pCi/g Cs-137           To achieve nineteen (19) mrem/yr Operational           2.90 pCi/g Co-60         TEDE (3) to demonstrate compliance DCGL               1.18 pCi/g Sr-90       with Equation 2 of this Release Record Scan Coverage                   N/A                     The LTP exempts this area Sediment           6.01 pCi/g Cs-137 The Operational DCGL meets the LTP Investigation         2.90 pCi/g Co-60             criteria for a Class 2 survey unit Level               1.18 pCi/g Sr-90 (1) The survey design used a much smaller value for investigation than the Operational DCGL provided by Table 2 as the total dose from existing and future groundwater had not been established at the time of planning the FSS (2) These values are based on the 9,862 m2 size of the initial survey unit design. I.e. Survey Unit 9106-0015 was a part of Survey Unit 9106-0007 when the grid sizes were calculated.
Feature~~
(3) The allowable dose for soil in this survey unit is nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE as the bounding dose from existing and future groundwater has been established based on field data (reference CY memo ISC 06-024.)
Design Criteria ~Basi Survey Unit Land 8,692 m 2 Based on AutoCAD-LT and Visual Area Sample Plan calculations Type I and Type 2 errors were 0.05, Number of 15 sigma was 0.133 the LBGR was set to Measurements 0.735 to maintain Relative Shift in the range of I and 3, Relative Shift was 2.0 Grid Spacing(2) 27.6 m Based on triangular grid 3.16 pCi/g Cs-137 Design DCGL 1.52 pCi/g Co-60 To achieve ten (10) mrem/yr TEDE 0.62 pCi/g Sr-90 6.01 pCi/g Cs-137 To achieve nineteen (19) mrem/yr Operational 2.90 pCi/g Co-60 TEDE (3) to demonstrate compliance DCGL 1.18 pCi/g Sr-90 with Equation 2 of this Release Record Scan Coverage N/A The LTP exempts this area Sediment 6.01 pCi/g Cs-137 The Operational DCGL meets the LTP Investigation 2.90 pCi/g Co-60 criteria for a Class 2 survey unit Level 1.18 pCi/g Sr-90 (1) The survey design used a much smaller value for investigation than the Operational DCGL provided by Table 2 as the total dose from existing and future groundwater had not been established at the time of planning the FSS (2) These values are based on the 9,862 m2 size of the initial survey unit design. I.e. Survey Unit 9106-0015 was a part of Survey Unit 9106-0007 when the grid sizes were calculated.
: 5. SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION Final Status Survey field activities were conducted under Work Plan and Inspection Record (WP&IR) 2006-0021. The WP&IR package included a detailed FSSP, job safety analysis, job planning checklist and related procedures for reference. Daily briefings were conducted to discuss the expectations for job performance and the safety aspects of the survey. The "Daily Survey Revision 0                                                 I1I Revision 0                                                 11
(3) The allowable dose for soil in this survey unit is nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE as the bounding dose from existing and future groundwater has been established based on field data (reference CY memo ISC 06-024.)5. SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION Final Status Survey field activities were conducted under Work Plan and Inspection Record (WP&IR) 2006-0021.
 
The WP&IR package included a detailed FSSP, job safety analysis, job planning checklist and related procedures for reference.
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Journal" was used to document field activities and other information pertaining to the FSS.
Daily briefings were conducted to discuss the expectations for job performance and the safety aspects of the survey. The "Daily Survey Revision 0 I1I Revision 0 11 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Journal" was used to document field activities and other information pertaining to the FSS.Measurement locations were identified in North American Datum (NAD) 1927 coordinates that were supplied to the sampling vendor, Ocean Survey, Inc.(OSI) of Old Saybrook, Connecticut.
Measurement locations were identified in North American Datum (NAD) 1927 coordinates that were supplied to the sampling vendor, Ocean Survey, Inc.
Discharge Canal sampling was accomplished using direct push technology to collect composite samples of bottom and mean high water mark sediments.
(OSI) of Old Saybrook, Connecticut.             Discharge Canal sampling was accomplished using direct push technology to collect composite samples of bottom and mean high water mark sediments. Sediment cores from the Discharge Canal were obtained by OSI using a vibrating corer that is platform mounted on a sampling vessel. The core barrel was a three (3) inch diameter thin-walled aluminum tube which also served as a core liner (ten (10) feet or less). A core catcher was available to prevent the sample from sliding out of the bottom of the tube. Vessel positioning and the determination of sample locations were accomplished using a GPS interfaced with a navigation and data logging system.
Sediment cores from the Discharge Canal were obtained by OSI using a vibrating corer that is platform mounted on a sampling vessel. The core barrel was a three (3) inch diameter thin-walled aluminum tube which also served as a core liner (ten (10) feet or less). A core catcher was available to prevent the sample from sliding out of the bottom of the tube. Vessel positioning and the determination of sample locations were accomplished using a GPS interfaced with a navigation and data logging system.After extraction, water was drained from above the sample by drilling holes above the sediment.
After extraction, water was drained from above the sample by drilling holes above the sediment. The liner was cut, capped, sealed, labeled and turned over to site personnel who processed and controlled the samples under Chain of Custody (COC) protocols in accordance with procedure RPM 5.1-5, "Chain of Custody for Final Status Survey Samples ". Rinsing of the barrel and associated equipment was performed between sampling events.               New aluminum tubes were used for each sample to prevent cross-contamination of subsequent samples.
The liner was cut, capped, sealed, labeled and turned over to site personnel who processed and controlled the samples under Chain of Custody (COC) protocols in accordance with procedure RPM 5.1-5, "Chain of Custody for Final Status Survey Samples ". Rinsing of the barrel and associated equipment was performed between sampling events. New aluminum tubes were used for each sample to prevent cross-contamination of subsequent samples.The fifteen (15) sediment samples were collected and packaged in accordance with Haddam Neck Plant (1-INP) Procedure RPM 5.1-3, "Collection of Sample Media for Final Status Survey ". Samples were controlled, transported, stored, and transferred to the off-site laboratory using COC protocols.
The fifteen (15) sediment samples were collected and packaged in accordance with Haddam Neck Plant (1-INP) Procedure RPM 5.1-3, "Collection of Sample Media for Final Status Survey ". Samples were controlled, transported, stored, and transferred to the off-site laboratory using COC protocols.
Four (4) samples (9106-0007-001F, 9106-0007-002F, 9106-0007-014F and 9106-0007-021F) were selected for HTD radionuclide analysis by the off-site laboratory.
Four (4) samples (9106-0007-001F, 9106-0007-002F, 9106-0007-014F and 9106-0007-021F) were selected for HTD radionuclide analysis by the off-site laboratory.
The implementation of survey specific quality control measures included the collection of two (2) split samples at locations 9106-0007-004F and 9106-0007-013F for "split sample" analysis by the off-site laboratory.
The implementation of survey specific quality control measures included the collection of two (2) split samples at locations 9106-0007-004F and 9106-0007-013F for "split sample" analysis by the off-site laboratory.
: 6. SURVEY RESULTS The off-site laboratory employed for the radiological analyses of samples was General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) -Charleston, South Carolina.
: 6. SURVEY RESULTS The off-site laboratory employed for the radiological analyses of samples was General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) - Charleston, South Carolina. The laboratory analyzed the fifteen (15) samples taken for non-parametric statistical testing and the associated duplicates using gamma spectroscopy. Sr-90 was analyzed by gas flow proportional counting. All analyses were performed to the required MDC.
The laboratory analyzed the fifteen (15) samples taken for non-parametric statistical testing and the associated duplicates using gamma spectroscopy.
Revision 0                                     12 Revision 0                                     12
Sr-90 was analyzed by gas flow proportional counting.
 
All analyses were performed to the required MDC.Revision 0 12 Revision 0 12 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Cesium-137 was identified in ten (10), Co-60 was identified in nine (9) and Sr-90 in two (2) of the fifteen (15) samples. The results reported for the remaining sample analyses indicated that activity was present at levels approaching or below the established detection limit in the remaining samples collected and analyzed for non-parametric testing.Several other radionuclides which were positively identified (i.e., a result greater than two (2) standard deviations uncertainty) could be de-selected or excluded using the 5% and 10% rule described in Section 5.4.7.2 of the LTP.The off-site laboratory also processed four (4) samples for full HTD analysis as required by the sample plan. The requested analyses included alpha spectroscopy and liquid scintillation depending upon the radionuclide and the measurement method. All analyses were performed to the required MDC.Some of the HTD radionuclides met the acceptance criteria for detection (i.e., a result greater than two (2) standard deviations uncertainty) in more than one sample; however, each of the positive results for HTD radionuclides could be de-selected based on the 5% and 10% rules.None of the sample results exceeded the Operational DCGL or required further investigation.
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Cesium-137 was identified in ten (10), Co-60             was identified in nine (9) and Sr-90 in two (2) of the fifteen (15) samples. The         results reported for the remaining sample analyses indicated that activity was             present at levels approaching or below the established detection limit in the           remaining samples collected and analyzed for non-parametric testing.
A summary of the sample results is provided in Table 5.1JUO-UUU/-UU 11` J.ZUhr_,U/
Several other radionuclides which were positively identified (i.e., a result greater than two (2) standard deviations uncertainty) could be de-selected or excluded using the 5% and 10% rule described in Section 5.4.7.2 of the LTP.
4.VOIL-UZ  
The off-site laboratory also processed four (4) samples for full HTD analysis as required by the sample plan. The requested analyses included alpha spectroscopy and liquid scintillation depending upon the radionuclide and the measurement method. All analyses were performed to the required MDC.
..). I,-U3Z5t 2./21Y.-U2-9106-0007-002F 4.41 E-0 1 2.79E-02' 3.43E-03 8.59E-02 9106-0007-003F 1.98E-01 -1.89E-02 1.1 2E-02 3.59E-02 9106-0007-004F 9.66E-03 3.42E-02 -6.42E-03 7.97E-03 9106-0007-005F 5.3 8E-0 1 1.90E-01 4.04E-02 1.89E-01 9106-0007-007F 2.5 1E-01 4.31 E-01 4.74E-03 1.95E-01 9106-0007-01 IF 2.26E-0I 3.14E-01 8.57E-03 1.53E-01 9106-0007-012F  
Some of the HTD radionuclides met the acceptance criteria for detection (i.e., a result greater than two (2) standard deviations uncertainty) in more than one sample; however, each of the positive results for HTD radionuclides could be de-selected based on the 5% and 10% rules.
-1.62E-02  
None of the sample results exceeded the Operational DCGL or required further investigation. A summary of the sample results is provided in Table 5.
-1.46E-02 8.97E-03 -1.22E-04 9106-0007-013F 2.21 E-02 1.86E-02 -9.81 E-03 1.77E-03 9106-0007-014F 3.94E-0 1 1.1 OE+00 3.92E-03 4.49E-0 I 9106-0007-015F 2.32E-02 1.35E-02 7.39E-03 1.48E-02 9106-0007-018F 1.62E-02 8.1 OE-03 1.76E-02 2.04E-02 9106-0007-019F 1.82E-01 3.96E-01 -2.18E-03 1.65E-01 9106-0007-020F 4.82E-01 1.65E-01 2.15E-02 1.55E-01 9106-0007-021F 3.94E-01 5.43 E-01 -2.21 E-03 2.5 1E-01 (1)The Operational DCGLs from Table 2 are 6.01 pCi/g for Cs-137, 2.90 pCi/g for Co-60 and 1.18 for Sr-90; these are used in conjunction with the unity rule to achieve nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE Biased samples were not specifically called for in the sample plan, and none were deemed necessary from field observations.
1JUO-UUU/-UU 11`     J.ZUhr_,U/     4.VOIL-UZ         )... I,-U3Z5t     2./21Y.-U2-9106-0007-002F         4.41 E-0 1     2.79E-02'       3.43E-03             8.59E-02 9106-0007-003F         1.98E-01     -1.89E-02         1.1 2E-02           3.59E-02 9106-0007-004F         9.66E-03       3.42E-02       -6.42E-03             7.97E-03 9106-0007-005F         5.3 8E-0 1     1.90E-01       4.04E-02             1.89E-01 9106-0007-007F         2.5 1E-01     4.31 E-01       4.74E-03             1.95E-01 9106-0007-01 IF       2.26E-0I       3.14E-01       8.57E-03             1.53E-01 9106-0007-012F       -1.62E-02     -1.46E-02       8.97E-03           -1.22E-04 9106-0007-013F         2.21 E-02     1.86E-02       -9.81 E-03           1.77E-03 9106-0007-014F         3.94E-0 1     1.1 OE+00       3.92E-03             4.49E-0 I 9106-0007-015F         2.32E-02       1.35E-02       7.39E-03             1.48E-02 9106-0007-018F         1.62E-02       8.1 OE-03       1.76E-02           2.04E-02 9106-0007-019F         1.82E-01       3.96E-01       -2.18E-03             1.65E-01 9106-0007-020F         4.82E-01       1.65E-01       2.15E-02             1.55E-01 9106-0007-021F         3.94E-01       5.43 E-01     -2.21 E-03           2.5 1E-01 (1) The Operational DCGLs from Table 2 are 6.01 pCi/g for Cs-137, 2.90 pCi/g for Co-60 and 1.18 for Sr-90; these are used in conjunction with the unity rule to achieve nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE Biased samples were not specifically called for in the sample plan, and none were deemed necessary from field observations.
Revision 0 13 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD 7. QUALITY CONTROL The off-site laboratory processed the split samples and performed gamma spectroscopy analysis.
Revision 0                                           13
Two (2) of the samples were selected for analysis, which exceeds the 5% minimum required by the LTP. The data were evaluated using USNRC acceptance criteria specified in Inspection Procedure 84750 and as detailed in HNP Procedure RPM 5.1-24, "Split Sample Assessment for Final Status Survey. " Each of the comparisons met the acceptance criteria.The sample analysis vendor, General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) -Charleston, ,South Carolina, maintained quality control and quality assurance plans as part of normal operation.
 
Refer to Attachment 2 for data and data quality analysis results.8. INVESTIGATIONS AND RESULTS None of the sample results exceeded the operational DCGL, thus no investigations were required.9. REMEDIATION AND RESULTS Historically, no radiological remedial action as described by MARSSIM Section 5.4 was performed in this survey unit prior to or as a result of the FSS. Health Physics TSD BCY-HP-0078, "ALARA Evaluation of Soil Remediation in Support of Final Status Survey, " determined that remediation beyond that required to meet the release criteria to be unnecessary and that the remaining residual radioactivity in soil was ALARA.10. CHANGES FROM THE FINAL STATUS SURVEY PLAN The survey was designed to ten (10) mrem/yr TEDE which was conservative and necessary at the time of FSS planning.
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD
It is no longer required as the total dose from existing and future groundwater has been established.
: 7. QUALITY CONTROL The off-site laboratory processed the split samples and performed gamma spectroscopy analysis. Two (2) of the samples were selected for analysis, which exceeds the 5% minimum required by the LTP. The data were evaluated using USNRC acceptance criteria specified in Inspection Procedure 84750 and as detailed in HNP Procedure RPM 5.1-24, "Split Sample Assessment for Final Status Survey. " Each of the comparisons met the acceptance criteria.
The dose for soil used to demonstrate compliance with the LTP criteria is nineteen (19)mrem/yr TEDE as discussed in Section 2 of this Release Record.11. DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT (DQA)The DQO sample design and data were reviewed in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-23, "Data Quality Assessment, " for completeness and consistency.
The sample analysis vendor, General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) -
The sampling design had adequate power as indicated by the Retrospective Power Curve. The Sign Test was performed on the data and compared to the original assumptions of the DQOs. The Sign Test shows that the survey unit passes FSS.Documentation was complete and legible. Surveys and sample collection were consistent with the DQOs and were sufficient to ensure that the survey unit was properly designated as Class 2.Revision 0 14 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD The preliminary data review consisted of calculating basic statistical quantities (e.g., mean, median, standard deviation).
Charleston, ,South Carolina, maintained quality control and quality assurance plans as part of normal operation. Refer to Attachment 2 for data and data quality analysis results.
The sample standard deviation was slightly more than the value used for the survey design. This is represented by the shift in the retrospective power curve as shown in Attachment 2f. This would indicate a change to the original LBGR to maintain the number of samples at fifteen (15) to meet the Operational DCGL. However, the value of the LBGR is less of a critical issue as the survey unit has passed the statistical test, and the mean and median values are well below the Operational DCGL when used in conjunction with the unity rule.Also, the retrospective power curve shows that a sufficient number of samples were collected to achieve the desired power. Therefore, the survey unit meets the release criteria with adequate power as required by the DQOs.The range of the data, about 3.6 standard deviations, was not unusually large.The difference between the mean and median was 25% of the standard deviation which indicates some skewness in the data. The data was represented graphically through posting plots, a frequency plot, and a quantile plot. The frequency plot shows some positive skewness as confirmed by the calculated skew of 1.37.All data, assessments, and graphical representations are provided in Attachment 2.12. ANOMALIES The configuration of this survey unit was changed from its initial design to a smaller Class 2 Survey Unit and a new Class 1 Survey Unit (Survey Unit #9106-0015) that had a surface area of approximately 1,170 in 2.The new survey unit became necessary when the sample result for 9106-0007-017F was received from the off-site laboratory, it was determined that the sample exceeded the Operational DCGL of nineteen (19) mrem/yr (the sample's activity was equivalent to 22.4 mrem/yr).
: 8. INVESTIGATIONS AND RESULTS None of the sample results exceeded the operational DCGL, thus no investigations were required.
Since sample results cannot exceed the DCGL in a Class 2 area, an approximately square rectangle of 1,170 m2 was removed from the footprint of the FSS design for Survey Unit 9106-0007.
: 9. REMEDIATION AND RESULTS Historically, no radiological remedial action as described by MARSSIM Section 5.4 was performed in this survey unit prior to or as a result of the FSS. Health Physics TSD BCY-HP-0078, "ALARA Evaluation of Soil Remediation in Support of Final Status Survey, " determined that remediation beyond that required to meet the release criteria to be unnecessary and that the remaining residual radioactivity in soil was ALARA.
Addendum 1 to the FSS plan was implemented to address the changes to the plan associated with the establishment of a new Class 1 Survey Unit and the relocation of four (4) sample points that would no longer reside within Survey Unit 9106-0007.
: 10. CHANGES FROM THE FINAL STATUS SURVEY PLAN The survey was designed to ten (10) mrem/yr TEDE which was conservative and necessary at the time of FSS planning. It is no longer required as the total dose from existing and future groundwater has been established. The dose for soil used to demonstrate compliance with the LTP criteria is nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE as discussed in Section 2 of this Release Record.
In accordance with Addendum 1, four (4) new sample locations were identified and sampled within Survey Unit 9106-0007.
: 11. DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT (DQA)
No other anomalies were noted within this survey unit.13. CONCLUSION Survey Unit 9106-0007 has met the final DQOs of the FSS. The ALARA criteria for soils as specified in Chapter 4 of the LTP were achieved.
The DQO sample design and data were reviewed in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-23, "Data Quality Assessment, " for completeness and consistency.
Elevated Measurement Comparison and remediation was not required.Revision 0 15 Revision 0 15 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD The sample data passed the Sign Test. The null hypothesis was rejected.Graphical representation of data indicates some positive skewness that is probably due to localized differences in particulate deposition rates, hydraulic velocity and sedimentation rates. The Retrospective Power Curve generated using COMPASS shows adequate power was achieved.
The sampling design had adequate power as indicated by the Retrospective Power Curve. The Sign Test was performed on the data and compared to the original assumptions of the DQOs. The Sign Test shows that the survey unit passes FSS.
The survey unit was properly designated as Class 2.The dose contribution from sediment is 2.2 mrem/yr TEDE based on the average concentration of the samples used for non-parametric statistical sampling.This survey unit is unaffected by existing groundwater (reference CY memo ISC 06-024). It has been determined that the dose contribution from groundwater sources is zero (0) mrem/yr TEDE.This survey unit is also not considered impacted by future groundwater radioactive contamination, as there are no concrete foundations or footings containing residual radioactive material within the groundwater saturated zone in the area (reference CY memo ISC 06-024). The dose contribution from future groundwater, the third dose component, is, therefore, zero (0) mrem/yr TEDE.The average total dose from residual radioactivity in this survey unit, including that from sediment, will not exceed 2.2 mrem/yr Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE).14. ATTACHMENTS 14.1 Attachment 1 -Figures 14.2 Attachment 2 -Sample and Statistical Data Revision 0 16 Revision 0 16 DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 1 Figures (5 pages)
Documentation was complete and legible. Surveys and sample collection were consistent with the DQOs and were sufficient to ensure that the survey unit was properly designated as Class 2.
K.r 0 420 840 jjjOFeet AW-cbmrdoxam in NAM~me7d shopahi yse Connectcut Yankee Atmic Power Company Site Map With Refeince To Survey Unit 9106-0007 jh.$ Sample Location 18 Inacvxemaille sawpl Lcaaadon 0 3 9106-0007 S 9 19 9 9 14 0 21 9 11 9 20 Sample Locaton Removed Due To QOation Of Wvey Unkt 9106-0015 2 4 0 13 9 15 0 35 70 NoWe COMAWMa'in NAD27Fbwin S Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 9106-0007 Final Status Survey Design SSample Locaton Sample Location 0 0.198) Smple Locatonf Due To QOation or SWvy Unit 9106-0015 9106-000 7 "0 0.182 0 0 0. 3,W 0 0.441 0.394 0 0 0.226 0 0.482 0.0221 0.0097 0 C4esim2-137 results am 8ivanihpCilg 0 35 70 NAD27CwcdcW Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 9106-O007Final Status Survey Design Cesium-137Posting Plot 4..Location Inacceoble Sample Locaton 0-0.0189 9106-0007 o 0.396 9 0 1.10 0 0.0279 0 0.314 0 0.165 Location Removed Due To Oetion Of Sw've Unit 9106-0015 0.0342 0.53 9 0.086 9 0 Alot Cbbaft-60 result we given in pci/g.0 35 70 MM;= == Fed Cbomfnewsmi NAD2Cbicde SAftPINWSY Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 9106-0007 Final Status Survey Design Cobalt-60 Posting Plot 4 K SMPIC Lomdon 0.0176~)Inaccessilble Sample Location 0 ab011 9106-0007 0.0404-0.0022 fo 0 0.0039 0 0.0034-0.0022 0 0 0.0086 0 0.0215-O.O98 9 Sample Locaion Removed Dw To Crecato Of Survey Unit 9106-0015-0o006 9 0.0074 S~Ntiu-zSO=&= am rvenmpfi 0 35 70 graFew No-NAD27CbnAIvdhN Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 9106-O007Final Status Survey Design Strontrmn-90 Posting Plot DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2 Sample and Statistical Data DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2a Sample Data (172 Pages)
Revision 0                                   14
Table of Contents G eneral Narrative  
 
..................................................................
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD The preliminary data review consisted of calculating basic statistical quantities (e.g., mean, median, standard deviation).
1 Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation  
The sample standard deviation was slightly more than the value used for the survey design. This is represented by the shift in the retrospective power curve as shown in Attachment 2f. This would indicate a change to the original LBGR to maintain the number of samples at fifteen (15) to meet the Operational DCGL. However, the value of the LBGR is less of a critical issue as the survey unit has passed the statistical test, and the mean and median values are well below the Operational DCGL when used in conjunction with the unity rule.
...........
Also, the retrospective power curve shows that a sufficient number of samples were collected to achieve the desired power. Therefore, the survey unit meets the release criteria with adequate power as required by the DQOs.
4 Radiological Analysis ..........................................................
The range of the data, about 3.6 standard deviations, was not unusually large.
9 Sample Data Summary ......................................................
The difference between the mean and median was 25% of the standard deviation which indicates some skewness in the data. The data was represented graphically through posting plots, a frequency plot, and a quantile plot. The frequency plot shows some positive skewness as confirmed by the calculated skew of 1.37.
28.Q uality C ontrol D ata ...........................................................
All data, assessments, and graphical representations are provided in Attachment 2.
66 General Narrative 1 CASE NARRATIVE For CONNECTICUT YANKEE RE: Sediment PO# 002332 Work Order: 163626 SDG: MSR #06-0730 June 19, 2006 Laboratory Identification:
: 12. ANOMALIES The configuration of this survey unit was changed from its initial design to a smaller Class 2 Survey Unit and a new Class 1 Survey Unit (Survey Unit #
General Engineering Laboratories, LLC Mailing Address: P.O. Box 30712 Charleston, South Carolina 29417 Express Mail Delivery and Shipping Address: 2040 Savage Road Charleston, South Carolina 29407 Telephone Number: (843) 556-8171 Summary: Sample receipt The sample(s) for this Project arrived at General Engineering Laboratories, LLC, (GEL)in Charleston, South Carolina on May 24, 2006. All sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage.
9106-0015) that had a surface area of approximately 1,170 in 2 . The new survey unit became necessary when the sample result for 9106-0007-017F was received from the off-site laboratory, it was determined that the sample exceeded the Operational DCGL of nineteen (19) mrem/yr (the sample's activity was equivalent to 22.4 mrem/yr). Since sample results cannot exceed the DCGL in a Class 2 area, an approximately square rectangle of 1,170 m2 was removed from the footprint of the FSS design for Survey Unit 9106-0007.
The chain of custody contained the proper documentation and signatures.
Addendum 1 to the FSS plan was implemented to address the changes to the plan associated with the establishment of a new Class 1 Survey Unit and the relocation of four (4) sample points that would no longer reside within Survey Unit 9106-0007. In accordance with Addendum 1, four (4) new sample locations were identified and sampled within Survey Unit 9106-0007.
No other anomalies were noted within this survey unit.
: 13. CONCLUSION Survey Unit 9106-0007 has met the final DQOs of the FSS. The ALARA criteria for soils as specified in Chapter 4 of the LTP were achieved. Elevated Measurement Comparison and remediation was not required.
Revision 0                                   15 Revision 0                                   15
 
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD The sample data passed the Sign Test. The null hypothesis was rejected.
Graphical representation of data indicates some positive skewness that is probably due to localized differences in particulate deposition rates, hydraulic velocity and sedimentation rates. The Retrospective Power Curve generated using COMPASS shows adequate power was achieved. The survey unit was properly designated as Class 2.
The dose contribution from sediment is 2.2 mrem/yr TEDE based on the average concentration of the samples used for non-parametric statistical sampling.
This survey unit is unaffected by existing groundwater (reference CY memo ISC 06-024).     It has been determined that the dose contribution from groundwater sources is zero (0) mrem/yr TEDE.
This survey unit is also not considered impacted by future groundwater radioactive contamination, as there are no concrete foundations or footings containing residual radioactive material within the groundwater saturated zone in the area (reference CY memo ISC 06-024). The dose contribution from future groundwater, the third dose component, is, therefore, zero (0) mrem/yr TEDE.
The average total dose from residual radioactivity in this survey unit, including that from sediment, will not exceed 2.2 mrem/yr Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE).
: 14. ATTACHMENTS 14.1 Attachment 1 - Figures 14.2 Attachment 2 - Sample and Statistical Data Revision 0                                     16 Revision 0                                     16
 
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 1 Figures (5 pages)
 
                                  .r K
0     420       840 jjjOFeet AW-cbmrdoxam in NAM~me7d shopahi yse Connectcut Yankee Atmic Power Company Site Map With Refeince To Survey Unit9106-0007
 
jh.
                                                                        $     Sample Location Inacvxemaille 18                                                                 sawpl Lcaaadon 0
3 Sample S                                                                Locaton 9106-0007 9                                     19 9   9 9 9
14 Removed Due To 0            21                                            20                QOation Of 2                                                          11                      Wvey Unkt 4      0                                              13            9106-0015 9
15 0       35     70 NoWe COMAWMa'in NAD27FbwinS Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 9106-0007FinalStatus Survey Design
 
SSample Locaton Sample Location
                                                                                      )    Smple Locatonf 0
0.198                                                                               Due To 9106-0007 "0 QOation or 0.182 0           SWvy Unit 9106-0015 0.3,W 0             0.394 0   0       0 0.482 0.441                                                        0.226 0.0097 0                                                     0.0221 0
C4esim2-137 results am 8ivanihpCilg 0       35     70 NAD27CwcdcW ConnecticutYankee Atomic PowerCompany 9106-O007FinalStatus Survey Design Cesium-137PostingPlot
 
4..
Location Inacceoble Sample Locaton 0
      -0.0189 9106-0007 o                                     0.396 9   0      0 0
1.10 Location Removed Due To 0                                                             0.165                  Oetion Of 0.0279           0.53                                    0.314                       Sw've Unit 0.0342  9                                                0.086            9106-0015 0                                                       9 Alot Cbbaft-60 result we given inpci/g.
0     35       70 MM;=
                                                                                              ==   Fed Cbomfnewsmi NAD2Cbicde SAftPINWSY ConnecticutYankee Atomic Power Company 9106-0007FinalStatus Survey Design Cobalt-60PostingPlot
 
4 K
SMPIC Lomdon
                                                                                                ~)Inaccessilble 0.0176                                                                               Sample Location 0
ab011 Sample 0.0404                                                                      Locaion 0
9106-0007                                                 -0.0022 fo 0         0 0
0.0039           Removed Dw To 0.0086 0.0215                  Crecato Of 0.0034                 -0.0022                                                                       Survey Unit
        -0o006            0                                                 -O.O98                 9106-0015 9                                                                     9 S~Ntiu-0.0074 zSO=&=   am rvenmpfi 0       35     70 graFew No-NAD27CbnAIvdhN Connecticut Yankee Atomic PowerCompany 9106-O007FinalStatus Survey Design Strontrmn-90 PostingPlot
 
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2 Sample and Statistical Data
 
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2a Sample Data (172 Pages)
 
Table of Contents G eneral Narrative .................................................................. 1 Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation ...........                               4 Radiological Analysis ..........................................................       9 Sample Data Summary ......................................................         28.
Q uality C ontrol D ata ........................................................... 66
 
General Narrative 1
 
CASE NARRATIVE For CONNECTICUT YANKEE RE: Sediment PO# 002332 Work Order: 163626 SDG: MSR #06-0730 June 19, 2006 Laboratory Identification:
General Engineering Laboratories, LLC Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 30712 Charleston, South Carolina 29417 Express Mail Delivery and Shipping Address:
2040 Savage Road Charleston, South Carolina 29407 Telephone Number:
(843) 556-8171 Summary:
Sample receipt The sample(s) for this Project arrived at General Engineering Laboratories, LLC, (GEL) in Charleston, South Carolina on May 24, 2006. All sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. The chain of custody contained the proper documentation and signatures.
The laboratory received the following sample(s):
The laboratory received the following sample(s):
Sample ID Client Sample ID 163626001 9106-0007-016F 163626002 9106-0007-017F 163626003 9106-0007-003F 163626004 9106-0007-004F 163626005 9106-0007-004FS 163626006 9106-0007-005F 163626007 9106-0007-006F 163626008 9106-0007-007F GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.PO. Box 30712
Sample ID               Client Sample ID 163626001               9106-0007-016F 163626002               9106-0007-017F 163626003               9106-0007-003F 163626004               9106-0007-004F 163626005               9106-0007-004FS 163626006               9106-0007-005F 163626007               9106-0007-006F 163626008               9106-0007-007F GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP,INC.
PO. Box 30712
* Charleston, SC 29417
* Charleston, SC 29417
* 2040 Savage Road (29407)Phone (843) 556-8171 o Fax (843) 766-1178 .www.gel.com 2
* 2040 Savage Road (29407)
Sample ID Client Sample ID 163626009 9106-0007-008F 163626010 9106-0007-01 IF 163626011 9106-0007-012F 163626012 9106-0007-013F 163626013 9106-0007-013FS 163626014 9106-0007-014F 163626015 9106-0007-015F 163626016 9106-0007-0OIF 163626017 9106-0007-002F Items of Note: There are no items of note.Case Narrative:
Phone (843) 556-8171 o Fax (843) 766-1178 . www.gel.com 2
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) Standard Operating Procedures.
 
Any technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are listed below by analytical parameter.
Sample ID                   Client Sample ID 163626009                 9106-0007-008F 163626010                 9106-0007-01 IF 163626011                 9106-0007-012F 163626012                 9106-0007-013F 163626013                 9106-0007-013FS 163626014                 9106-0007-014F 163626015                 9106-0007-015F 163626016                 9106-0007-0OIF 163626017                 9106-0007-002F Items of Note:
Analytical Request: Fifteen sediment samples were analyzed for FSSGAM and Sr-90.Two sediment samples were analyzed for FSSALL.Internal Chain of Custody: Custody was maintained for the sample(s).
There are no items of note.
Data Package: The enclosed data package contains the following sections:
Case Narrative:
Case Narrative, Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation and all analytical fractions.
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) Standard Operating Procedures. Any technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are listed below by analytical parameter.
Analytical Request:
Fifteen sediment samples were analyzed for FSSGAM and Sr-90.
Two sediment samples were analyzed for FSSALL.
Internal Chain of Custody:
Custody was maintained for the sample(s).
Data Package:
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation and all analytical fractions.
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the SOW, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hard copy data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or a designee, as verified by the following signature.
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the SOW, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hard copy data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or a designee, as verified by the following signature.
Cheryl Jones Project Manager GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.P.O. Box 30712 -Charleston, SC 29417 -2040 Savage Road (29407)Phone (843) 556-8171
Cheryl Jones Project Manager GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.
P.O. Box 30712 - Charleston, SC 29417 - 2040 Savage Road (29407)
Phone (843) 556-8171
* Fax (843) 766-1178
* Fax (843) 766-1178
* www.gel.com 3
* www.gel.com 3
Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation 4
Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation 4
Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5104-003 -Attachment B-CY-001 Major Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Chain of Custody Form No. 2006-00362 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556
 
Health Physics Procedure                                                                                     GPP-GGGR-R5104-003 -Attachment B-CY-001 Major Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company                                                         Chain of Custody Form                                   No. 2006-00362 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556                           G______2-_____________________
___________________
___________________
G______2-_____________________
Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning                                                     Analyses Requested       Lab                                                         -Use
Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning Analyses Requested Lab -Use .Only,..Contact Name & Phone: Comm s: ..Jack McCarthy 860-267-2556 Ext. 3024 .Analytical Lab (Name, City, State)General Engineering Laboratories  
                                                                                                                                                                                            .Only,..
*.2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407 843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones V)Priority:
Contact Name & Phone:                                                                                                   Comm         s:           .                         .
Z 30 D. [] 14 D. [] 7D. Container  
Jack McCarthy 860-267-2556 Ext. 3024                                                                                     .
.. '> ;Sample Size- .. ;... f Media Type &Type .. ..... .Sample Designation Date Time Code Code Code Comment, Preservation -Laib8 Ie" D 9106-0007-016F 5/10/06 14:54 SE C BP x x Transferred fromCOC 2006-00343 9106-0007-017F 5/11/06 10:39 SE C BP x x Transferred from COC 2006-00345 t 2. 9106-0007-OOIF 5/11/06 09:43 SE C BP X Transferred from COC 2006-00345 4 z (. lot (d&#xfd; 9106-0007-002F 5/08/06 13:27 SE C BP x Transferred from COC 2006-00329
Analytical Lab (Name, City, State)
-9106-0007-003F 5/08/06 13:53 SE C BP x x Transferred from COC 2006-00329  
General Engineering Laboratories                                                                                                     *.
.9106-0007-004F 5/08/06 14:13 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00329[, 4 9106-0007-004FS 5/08/06 14:13 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00329 9106-0007-005F 5/08/06 14:32 SE C BP x x Transferred from COC 2006-00329 9106-0007-006F 5/08/06 14:52 SE C BP X x Transferred from COC 2006-00329 U., ', 6I 910-00700F  
2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407 843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones                                                               V)
/0/06 1452 SE C P --. Trnsere-fo CC 06-039.I L1I NOTES: PO#: 002332 MSR#: 06- 0736 SSWP# NA[] LTP QA [] Radwaste QA El Non QA 1 elin)sehe Date/Time
Priority: Z 30 D. [] 14 D. [] 7D.                                       Container                                         .. '> ;
: 2) R eiv Date/Time 3)eflinquished By Date/Time
Sample     Size-                                                                         .. ;...                 f Media   Type     &Type                                                     ..   . ....                 .
: 4) Recei y d B Date/Time Samples Shipped Via:[ Fed Ex El ups El Hand E] Other Bill of Lading #"8-z ot~ 0 51 s:-..'Temip.: D&#xfd;Custdy ea l Intac~t?Y*~ LI N Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5104-003 -Attachment B-CY-001 Major Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5 104-003 -Attachment B-CY-00 1 Major Chain of Custody Form No. 2006-00363 Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 362 lnjun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556  
Sample Designation             Date       Time     Code     Code     Code                                                 Comment, Preservation               -Laib8           Ie" D
/ 23(I, .".Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning Analyses Requested Lab U Contact Name & Phone: ~Commients:  
9106-0007-016F               5/10/06       14:54     SE       C       BP           x               x               Transferred fromCOC 2006-00343 L1I    9106-0007-017F               5/11/06       10:39     SE       C       BP         x               x               Transferred from COC 2006-00345             t *:-VI 2.
~ ~Jack McCarthy 860-267-2556 Ext. 3024 Analytical Lab (Name, City, State) .., .General Engineering Laboratories 2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407 0 -, ., 843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones V)Priority:
9106-0007-OOIF               5/11/06       09:43     SE       C       BP               X                           Transferred from COC 2006-00345                 4 z (. lot (d
30 D.[ 14 D. L]I7 D. Container  
    &#xfd; 9106-0007-002F               5/08/06       13:27     SE       C       BP                   x                       Transferred from COC 2006-00329
-Sample Size- * : #Media Type &Type Sample Designation Date Time Code Code Code -,: -Comment, Preservation Lab: c 91 06-0007-007F 5/08/06 15:11 SE C BP -Transferred from COC 2006-00329 9106-0007-008F 5/09/06 10:39 SE C BP x -Transferred from COC 2006-00334 19106-0007-01 IF 5/09/06 09:43 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 4&#xfd; f i , Z.9106-0007-012F 5/09/06 13:27 SE C BP x X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 , 16 9106-0007-013F 5/09/06 13:53 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 t2 9106-0007-013FS 5/09/06 14:13 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 1 1 4,362 013 , 9106-0007-014F 5/09/06 14:13 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 S9106-0007-015F 5/16/06 07:56 SE C BP x x Transferred from COC 2006-00353 43 2 4, "w..0~i~NOTES: PO #: 002332 MSR#: 06- 0730 SSWP#NA 0ct&#xfd;5(3/SLTP QA FZ Radwaste QA E] Non QA I) ,linquis Date/Time
    - 9106-0007-003F                 5/08/06       13:53     SE       C       BP         x               x               Transferred from COC 2006-00329         .
: 2) R eiv By Date/Time 3) Relinquished By Date/Time
9106-0007-004F               5/08/06       14:13     SE       C       BP         X               X               Transferred from COC 2006-00329[,                       4 9106-0007-004FS               5/08/06       14:13     SE       C       BP         X               X               Transferred from COC 2006-00329 9106-0007-005F               5/08/06       14:32     SE       C       BP         x               x               Transferred from COC 2006-00329 9106-0007-006F               5/08/06       14:52     SE       C       BP         X               x               Transferred from COC 2006-00329                   ', U., 6I 910-00700F /0/06       1452       SE       C         P         -               -.               Trnsere-fo       CC 06-039.I NOTES: PO#: 002332 MSR#: 06- 0736 SSWP# NA                         [] LTP QA         [] Radwaste QA         El Non QA         Samples Shipped Via:
: 4) Rec ivedBy Date/Time Samples Shipped Via:[ Fed Ex ZUPS[]Hand LI Other Bill of Lading #-7q)-l 673 6 Intenial Cuitainer Cxstociy, ealed?Cyu&#xfd;.ody &#xfd;eal ntact?
[ Fed Ex                        'Temip.:          D&#xfd; El ups El Hand Custdy ea l Intac~t?
0 SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM 01 PM use only Client: co',SDG/ARCOC/Work Order: t k7&#xfd;D ecv PM(A) Review (ensure n-con are resolved prior to signing): Receivred  
1    elin)sehe                             Date/Time         2) R eiv                                     Date/Time           E] Other 3)eflinquished By                         Date/Time         4) Recei d B y                              Date/Time Bill of Lading #
~ fj By:___________________
                                                                                                                                      "8-z ot~ 051        s:-..           Y*~ LI      N
Sample Receipt Criteria Comments/Qualifiers (Required for Non-Conforming Items)Shipping containers received intact Circle Applicable:
 
seals broken damaged container leaking container other (describe) and sealed?Samples requiring cold Circle Coolant # ice bags blue ice dry ice ( ) other describe)2 preservation within (4 +/- 2 C)?Record preservation method. __ _ __ _ _ _Chain of custody documents included with shipment?4 Sample containers intact and Circle Applicable:
Health Physics Procedure                                                                               GPP-GGGR-R5104-003 -Attachment B-CY-001 Major Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5 104-003 -Attachment B-CY-00 1 Major Chain of Custody Form                                 No. 2006-00363 Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 362 lnjun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556                                     / 23(I,   .".
seals broken damaged container leaking container other (describe) sealed?5 Samples requiring chemical Sample ID's, containers affected and observed pH: preservation at proper pH?6 VOA vials free of headspace Sample ID's and containers affected:_ (defined as < 6amm bubble)? ell Are Encore containers present?7 (If yes, immediately deliver to VOA laboratory) 8 Samples received within holding Id's and tests affected: time?9 Sample ID's on COC match ID's Sample ID's and containers affected: on bottles?Date & time on COC match date Sample ID's affected: 10& time on bottles?Number of containers received Sample ID's affected: match number indicated on COC?COC form is properly signed in 12 relinquished/received sections?.1..,_..__._._..._
Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning                                                 Analyses Requested       Lab U       Onlquestedy~avT*s,.:
_ l14 Air Bill ,Tracking  
Contact Name & Phone:                                                     ~Commients:
#'s, &Additional Comments .y. :-I~ RSO RAD Receipt #__Suspected Hazard Information 8 *If > x2 area background is observed on samples identified as "non&#xfd;*" regulated/non-radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety group for further__ investigation.
Jack McCarthy 860-267-2556 Ext. 3024
A RadiologicalClassiication?
                                                                                                                                                  ~      ~
Maximum Counts Observed*:
Analytical Lab (Name, City, State)
BPCB Regulae? Comments: Shipped a DOT*Hazardous C Material?
                                                                                                                            ..                                   ,           .
If yes, contact Waste e Hazard Class Shipped: Manager or ESH Manager. UN#: PM (or PMA) review of Hazard classification:
General Engineering Laboratories 2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407                                               0   -       ,                                 .             ,
Initials Date: 7 Connecticut Yankee Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Services .CY-ISC-SOW-O00 Figure 1. Sample Check-in List, Date/Time Received:
843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones                                                           V)
S.q\SDG#:. s-073t Work Order Number: Shipping Cclhtainer D L 3 -Chain of Custody'#. .UtI- , 1. Custody Seals oi shipping container intact?." -Yes N4 No [J 2. Custody Seals dated and signed? Yes /3 No []3. Chain-of-Custody record present? Yes (4 No [ ].4. Cooler temperature (2.5. Vermiculite/packing materials is: " Wet x t Dry j 1] IVA 6.:" Number of sampleS in shipping container  
Priority:     30 D.[   14 D. L]I7 D.                                   Container                                     -
" 7. Sample holding times ex&eeded?
Sample     Size-Media     Type     &Type                                                             *          :                  #
Yes [ No Were any anomalies identified in ,sample receipt? Yes yO] 1. "Description of anomalies,(include sample numbers): 8 RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS 9 Radiochemistry Case Narrative Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co. (YANK)Work Order 163626 Method/Analysis Information Product: Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified Analytical Method: Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Bitch Number: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 533456 533364 533363 Sample ID 163626016 163626017 1201101075 1201101076 1201101077 1201101078 Client ID 9106-0007-001F 9106-0007-002F Method Blank (MB)163629001 (9508-0000-003C)
Sample Designation               Date       Time       Code     Code     Code                       -,:     -         Comment, Preservation             Lab:       c 91 06-0007-007F               5/08/06         15:11     SE       C         BP                                   Transferred from COC 2006-00329
Sample Duplicate (DUP)163629001(9508-0000-003C)
                                                                                                    -
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.Calibration Information:
* 0~i~ 9106-0007-008F                 5/09/06       10:39       SE       C       BP       x                 -         Transferred from COC 2006-00334 19106-0007-01 IF               5/09/06       09:43       SE       C       BP       X           X               Transferred from COC 2006-00334       4&#xfd; f i Z.
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
9106-0007-012F                                                                                                                                                             ,
10 Quality Control (Q0 Information:
5/09/06       13:27       SE       C       BP       x         X                 Transferred from COC 2006-00334             ,16 9106-0007-013F               5/09/06         13:53     SE 9106-0007-013FS C         BP       X           X               Transferred from COC 2006-00334     t2 5/09/06       14:13       SE       C       BP       X
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).
    , 9106-0007-014F                 5/09/06       14:13       SE X               Transferred from COC 2006-00334     1 4,362 013 C        BP        X          X                Transferred from COC 2006-00334 S9106-0007-015F               5/16/06       07:56       SE       C       BP       x           x               Transferred from COC 2006-00353           43 2 4,"w..
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
NOTES: PO #: 002332         MSR#: 06- 0730 SSWP#NA                     SLTP QA                                            Samples Shipped Via:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Sample 1201101076 (9508-0000-003C) was recounted due to a negative result greater than three times the error.Miscellaneous Information:
0ct&#xfd;5(3/                               FZ Radwaste QA     E] Non QA                                       Intenial Cuitainer
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
[ Fed Ex ZUPS
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information
[]Hand                            Cxstociy, ealed?
.1 Product: Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Pu- I1-RC Modified Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 533457 533364 533363 Sample ID 163626016 163626017 1201101079 1201101080 1201101081 1201101082 Client ID 9106-0007-001F 9106-0007-002F Method Blank (MB)163629001(9508-0000-003C)
I)  ,linquis                               Date/Time           2) R eiv   By                         Date/Time                                       Cyu&#xfd;.ody &#xfd;eal ntact?
Sample Duplicate (DUP)163629001(9508-0000-003C)
LI  Other
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.Calibration Information:
: 3) Relinquished By                          Date/Time          4) Rec ivedBy                         Date/Time Bill of Lading #
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
                                                                                                                                  -7q)-l 673 6
 
0                                     SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM 01 PM use only Client:     co',SDG/ARCOC/Work                                                               Order:                     t     k7&#xfd; D ecv                             PM(A) Review (ensure           n-con                 are resolved prior to signing):
Receivred           ~         fj By:___________________
Sample Receipt Criteria                                         Comments/Qualifiers (Required for Non-Conforming Items)
Shipping containers received intact                         Circle Applicable: seals broken damaged container leaking container   other (describe) and sealed?
Samples requiring cold                                     Circle Coolant #       ice bags       blue ice       dry ice     (   )     other describe) 2 preservation within (4 +/- 2 C)?
Record preservation method.                     __                             _           __                       _          _           _
Chain of custody documents included with shipment?
4 Sample containers intact and                                 Circle Applicable: seals broken damaged container leaking container   other (describe) sealed?
5 Samples requiring chemical                                   Sample ID's, containers affected and observed pH:
preservation at proper pH?
Sample ID's and containers affected:
6 VOA vials free of headspace
_   (defined   as < 6amm bubble)?                         ell Are Encore containers present?
7 (If yes, immediately deliver to VOA laboratory) 8 Samples received within holding                             Id's and tests affected:
time?
9 Sample ID's on COC match ID's                                 Sample ID's and containers affected:
on bottles?
Sample ID's affected:
10 Date & time on COC match date
    & time on bottles?
Number of containers received                               Sample ID's affected:
match number indicated on COC?
12 COC     form is properly signed in relinquished/received         sections?.1..,_..__._._..._                                                                                     _         l 14 Air Bill   ,Tracking #'s, &
Additional Comments                                                           .         y. * :-
I~
RSO RAD Receipt #__
Suspected Hazard Information                   8           *If > x2 area background is observed on samples identified as "non&#xfd;
                                                  *"           regulated/non-radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety group for further
__      investigation.
A RadiologicalClassiication?                                   Maximum Counts Observed*:
BPCB Regulae?                                               Comments:
Shipped a DOT*Hazardous C Material? If yes, contact Waste                   e           Hazard Class Shipped:
Manager or ESH Manager.                                     UN#:
PM (or PMA) review of Hazard classification:                               Initials                         Date:
7
 
Connecticut Yankee Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Services                               .       CY-ISC-SOW-O00 Figure 1. Sample Check-in List, Date/Time Received:     S.q\
SDG#:.                             s-073t Work Order Number:
Shipping Cclhtainer ID1I*9 L D *l 3             -   Chain of Custody'#. .UtI-               ,
: 1.     Custody Seals oi shipping container intact?."
                                                                                -Yes     N4 [J No
: 2.       Custody Seals dated and signed?
Yes /3 No []
: 3.       Chain-of-Custody record present?
Yes (4 No [ ]
    .4.       Cooler temperature                   (2.
: 5.       Vermiculite/packing materials is:
                                                                  "           Wetx t   Dry j 1] IVA 6.:"     Number of sampleS in shipping container
                                                                                        "
: 7.       Sample holding times ex&eeded?
Yes [   No Were any anomalies identified in ,sample receipt?               Yes yO
] 1.       "Description of anomalies,(include sample numbers):
8
 
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS 9
 
Radiochemistry Case Narrative Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co. (YANK)
Work Order 163626 Method/Analysis Information Product:                                           Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                  DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           533456 Prep Bitch Number:                                 533364 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           533363 Sample ID      Client ID 163626016     9106-0007-001F 163626017      9106-0007-002F 1201101075    Method Blank (MB) 1201101076      163629001 (9508-0000-003C) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201101077      163629001(9508-0000-003C) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201101078    Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
10
 
Quality Control (Q0     Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Sample 1201101076 (9508-0000-003C) was recounted due to a negative result greater than three times the error.
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/Analysis Information
                                                    .1
 
Product:                                           Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu- I1-RC Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           533457 Prep Batch Number:                                 533364 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           533363 Sample ID       Client ID 163626016      9106-0007-001F 163626017      9106-0007-002F 1201101079    Method Blank (MB) 1201101080      163629001(9508-0000-003C) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201101081      163629001(9508-0000-003C) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201101082    Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (0C0 Information:
Quality Control (0C0 Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.12 Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
12
 
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS DOE EML HASL-300, Pu- 11-RC Modified Analytical Method: Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 537066 533364 533363 13 Sample ID Client ID 163626016 9106-0007-OO1F 163626017 9106-0007-002F 1201109335 Method Blank (MB)1201109336 163626016(9106-0007-001F)
Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)1201109337 163626016(9106-0007-OO1F)
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Matrix Spike (MS)1201109338 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-035 REV# 8.Calibration Information:
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Method/Analysis Information Product:                                           Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                DOE EML HASL-300, Pu- 11-RC Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           537066 Prep Batch Number:                                 533364 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           533363 13
 
Sample ID       Client ID 163626016       9106-0007-OO1F 163626017       9106-0007-002F 1201109335     Method Blank (MB) 1201109336     163626016(9106-0007-001F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201109337     163626016(9106-0007-OO1F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201109338     Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-035 REV# 8.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163626016 (9106-0007-001F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163626016 (9106-0007-001F).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from 14 referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from 14
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Analytical Method: EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 533723 Prep Batch Number: 533363 Sample ID Client ID 163626001 9106-0007-016F 163626002 9106-0007-017F 163626003 9106-0007-003F 163626004 9106-0007-004F 163626005 9106-0007-004FS 163626006 9106-0007-005F 163626007 9106-0007-006F 163626008 9106-0007-007F 163626009 9106-0007-008F 163626010 9106-0007-01 IF 163626011 9106-0007-012F 163626012 9106-0007-013F 163626013 9106-0007-013FS 163626014 9106-0007-014F 163626015 9106-0007-015F 163626016 9106-0007-OO1F 163626017 9106-0007-002F 1201101711 Method Blank (MB)1201101712 163626001(9106-0007-016F)
 
Sample Duplicate (DUP)1201101713 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)15 SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-0 13 REV# 11.Calibration Information:
referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/Analysis Information Product:                     Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Analytical Method:           EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 Prep Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:     533723 Prep Batch Number:           533363 Sample ID     Client ID 163626001     9106-0007-016F 163626002     9106-0007-017F 163626003     9106-0007-003F 163626004     9106-0007-004F 163626005     9106-0007-004FS 163626006     9106-0007-005F 163626007     9106-0007-006F 163626008     9106-0007-007F 163626009     9106-0007-008F 163626010     9106-0007-01 IF 163626011     9106-0007-012F 163626012     9106-0007-013F 163626013     9106-0007-013FS 163626014     9106-0007-014F 163626015     9106-0007-015F 163626016     9106-0007-OO1F 163626017     9106-0007-002F 1201101711   Method Blank (MB) 1201101712     163626001(9106-0007-016F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201101713   Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 15
 
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-0 13 REV# 11.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QCQ Information:
Quality Control (QCQ Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163626001 (9106-0007-016F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163626001 (9106-0007-016F).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Additional Comments The relative percent difference between samples 1201101712 (9106-0007-016F) and 163626001 (9106-0007-016F) for Am-241 did not meet the duplication criteria.
Additional Comments The relative percent difference between samples 1201101712 (9106-0007-016F) and 163626001 (9106-0007-016F) for Am-241 did not meet the duplication criteria. However, when a relative error ratio is calculated, precision is shown at 1.05293.
However, when a relative error ratio is calculated, precision is shown at 1.05293.16 Qualifier information Qualifier U1 Reason Data rejected due to high Full-Width Half-Maximum.
16
Data rejected due to high counting uncertainty.
 
Data rejected due to interference.
Qualifier information Qualifier                           Reason                           Analyte      Sample Data rejected due to high Full-Width U1                                                                Manganese-54  163626007 Half-Maximum.
Data rejected due to low abundance.
163626012 UI            Data rejected due to high counting uncertainty.     Bismuth-212  163626015 UI            Data rejected due to interference.                   Europium- 155 163626009 UI            Data rejected due to low abundance.                 Cesium- 134   163626001 163626003 163626005 163626010 163626012 163626013 Lead-212     1201101711 Potassium-40 1201101711 Method/Analysis Information Product:                                           GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                 EPA 905.0 Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           536335 Prep Batch Number:                                 533364 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           533363 17
Analyte Manganese-54 UI UI UI Bismuth-212 Europium-155 Cesium- 134 Sample 163626007 163626012 163626015 163626009 163626001 163626003 163626005 163626010 163626012 163626013 1201101711 1201101711 Lead-212 Potassium-40 Method/Analysis Information Product: Analytical Method: Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS EPA 905.0 Modified Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 536335 533364 533363 17 Sample ID 163626001 163626002 163626003 163626004 163626005 163626006 163626007 163626008 163626009 163626010 163626011 163626012 163626013 163626014 163626015 163626016 163626017 1201107674 1201107675 1201107676 1201107677 Client ID 9106-0007-016F 9106-0007-017F 9106-0007-003F 9106-0007-004F 9106-0007-004FS 9106-0007-005F 9106-0007-006F 9106-0007-007F 9106-0007-008F 9106-0007-01 1F 9106-0007-012F 9106-0007-013F 9106-0007-013FS 9106-0007-014F 9106-0007-015F 9106-0007-00IF 9106-0007-002F Method Blank (MB)163105017(9106-0010-008F)
 
Sample Duplicate (DUP)163105017(9106-0010-008F)
Sample ID       Client ID 163626001      9106-0007-016F 163626002      9106-0007-017F 163626003      9106-0007-003F 163626004      9106-0007-004F 163626005      9106-0007-004FS 163626006      9106-0007-005F 163626007      9106-0007-006F 163626008      9106-0007-007F 163626009      9106-0007-008F 163626010      9106-0007-01 1F 163626011      9106-0007-012F 163626012      9106-0007-013F 163626013      9106-0007-013FS 163626014      9106-0007-014F 163626015      9106-0007-015F 163626016      9106-0007-00IF 163626017      9106-0007-002F 1201107674      Method Blank (MB) 1201107675      163105017(9106-0010-008F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201107676      163105017(9106-0010-008F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201107677      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-004 REV# 10.Calibration Information:
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-004 REV# 10.
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QCQ Information:
Quality Control (QCQ Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163105017 (9106-0010-008F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.18 Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163105017 (9106-0010-008F).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Chemical Recoveries All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.Miscellaneous Information:
18
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
 
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: Analytical Batch Number: Sample ID 163626016 163626017 1201101894 1201101895 1201101896 1201101897 DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified 533813 Client ID 9106-0007-001F 9106-0007-002F Method Blank (MB)163629001 (9508-0000-003C)
Technical Information:
Sample Duplicate (DUP)163629001(9508-0000-003C)
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this 19 narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-005 REV# 13.Calibration Information:
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Quality Control (Q0 Information:
Chemical Recoveries All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).
Miscellaneous Information:
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/Analysis Information Product:                       Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:           DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analytical Batch Number:      533813 Sample ID      Client ID 163626016      9106-0007-001F 163626017      9106-0007-002F 1201101894      Method Blank (MB) 1201101895      163629001 (9508-0000-003C) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201101896      163629001(9508-0000-003C) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201101897      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this 19
 
narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-005 REV# 13.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (Q0     Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information 20 Product: Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Fe-1, Modified Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 533888 533364 533363 Sample ID 163626016 163626017 1201102097 1201102098 1201102099 1201102100 Client ID 9106-0007-00IF 9106-0007-002F Method Blank (MB)163629001(9508-0000-003C)
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)163629001 (9508-0000-003C)
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-040 REV# 3.Calibration Information:
Method/Analysis Information 20
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
 
Product:                                           Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                 DOE RESL Fe-1, Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           533888 Prep Batch Number:                                 533364 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           533363 Sample ID       Client ID 163626016        9106-0007-00IF 163626017      9106-0007-002F 1201102097      Method Blank (MB) 1201102098      163629001(9508-0000-003C) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201102099      163629001 (9508-0000-003C) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201102100      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-040 REV# 3.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.21 Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
21
 
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Ni-1, Modified Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 533889 533364 533363 Sample ID 163626016 163626017 1201102101 1201102102 1201102103 1201102104 Client ID 9106-0007-001F 9106-0007-002F Method Blank (MB)163629001 (9508-0000-003C)
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)163629001(9508-0000-003C)
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)22 SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-022 REV# 8.Calibration Information:
Method/Analysis Information Product:                                           Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                 DOE RESL Ni-1, Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           533889 Prep Batch Number:                                 533364 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           533363 Sample ID       Client ID 163626016      9106-0007-001F 163626017      9106-0007-002F 1201102101      Method Blank (MB) 1201102102      163629001 (9508-0000-003C) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201102103      163629001(9508-0000-003C) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201102104      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 22
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
 
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-022 REV# 8.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.23 Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Analytical Method: Analytical Batch Number: Sample ID 163626016 163626017 1201106885 1201106886 1201106887 1201106888 LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid-HTD2,ALL FSS EPA 906.0 Modified 535984 Client ID 9106-0007-001F 9106-0007-002F Method Blank (MB)163626016(9106-0007-001 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP)163626016(9106-0007-OOF)
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-002 REV# 12.Calibration Information:
23
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
 
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/Analysis Information Product:                       LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid-HTD2,ALL FSS Analytical Method:              EPA 906.0 Modified Analytical Batch Number:        535984 Sample ID      Client ID 163626016      9106-0007-001F 163626017      9106-0007-002F 1201106885      Method Blank (MB) 1201106886      163626016(9106-0007-001 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201106887      163626016(9106-0007-OOF) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201106888      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-002 REV# 12.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163626016 (9106-0007-001F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.24 Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163626016 (9106-0007-001F).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
24
 
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint C14, Solid AII,FSS Analytical Method: Analytical Batch Number: Sample ID 163626016 163626017 1201104921 1201104922 1201104923 1201104924 EPA EERF C-01 Modified 535068 Client ID 9106-0007-OO1F 9106-0007-002F Method Blank (MB)163629001(9508-0000-003C)
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)163629001(9508-0000-003C)
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-003 REV# 8.25 Calibration Information:
Method/Analysis Information Product:                     Liquid Scint C14, Solid AII,FSS Analytical Method:           EPA EERF C-01 Modified Analytical Batch Number:      535068 Sample ID      Client ID 163626016      9106-0007-OO1F 163626017      9106-0007-002F 1201104921    Method Blank (MB) 1201104922    163629001(9508-0000-003C) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201104923    163629001(9508-0000-003C) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201104924      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-003 REV# 8.
25
 
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples were reprepped due to low/high recovery.Miscellaneous Information:
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
Technical Information:
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all 26 of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples were reprepped due to low/high recovery.
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all 26
 
of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Review Validation:
Review Validation:
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator.
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.
In addition, all data designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:
Reviewer/Date:
Reviewer/Date:
27 SAMPLE DATA  
27
 
SAMPLE DATA


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
28 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report for YANKOO Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.Client SDG: MRS#06-0730 GEL Work Order: 163626 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria** Analyte is a surrogate compound U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification ND The analyte concentration is not detected above the reporting limit.The above
 
28
 
GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report for YANKOO Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.
Client SDG: MRS#06-0730 GEL Work Order: 163626 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
**  Analyte is a surrogate compound U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.
UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification ND    The analyte concentration is not detected above the reporting limit.
The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis except where prohibited by the analytical procedure.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.
This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with General Engineering Laboratories, LLC standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Cheryl Jones.
Reviewed by 29
 
GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company :    Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address :    362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424                                                  Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact:    Mr. Jack McCarthy Project:    Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID:                  9106-0007-016F                  Project:      YANK01204 Sample ID:                        163626001                        Client ID: YANK001 Matrix:                            Soil                            Vol. Recv.:
Collect Date:                      10-MAY-06 Receive Date:                      24-MAY-06 Collector:                        Client
The laboratory received the following sample(s):
The laboratory received the following sample(s):
Sample ID Client Sample ID 167554001 9106-0007-018F 167554002 9106-0007-019F 167554003 9106-0007-020F 167554004 9106-0007-021F Items of Note: There are no items of note.GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.P.O. Box 30712 -Charleston, SC 29417 -2040 Savage Road (29407)Phone (843) 556-8171
Sample ID                 Client Sample ID 167554001               9106-0007-018F 167554002               9106-0007-019F 167554003                 9106-0007-020F 167554004               9106-0007-021F Items of Note:
* 766-1178 -www.gel.com Case Narrative:
There are no items of note.
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) Standard Operating Procedures.
GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP,INC.
Any technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are listed below by analytical parameter.
P.O. Box 30712 - Charleston, SC 29417 - 2040 Savage Road (29407)
Analytical Request: Four soil samples were analyzed for FSSGAM and Sr-90.Internal Chain of Custody: Custody was maintained for the sample(s).
Phone (843) 556-8171
Data Package: The enclosed data package contains the following sections:
* Fa*83) 766-1178 - www.gel.com
Case Narrative, Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation and all analytical fractions.
 
Case Narrative:
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) Standard Operating Procedures. Any technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are listed below by analytical parameter.
Analytical Request:
Four soil samples were analyzed for FSSGAM and Sr-90.
Internal Chain of Custody:
Custody was maintained for the sample(s).
Data Package:
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation and all analytical fractions.
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the SOW, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hard copy data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or a designee, as verified by the following signature.
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the SOW, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hard copy data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or a designee, as verified by the following signature.
Cheryl Jones Project Manager GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.P.O. Box 30712 .Charleston, SC 29417 -2040 Savage Road (29407)Phone (843) 556-8171 -FaYI843) 766-1178
Cheryl Jones Project Manager GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.
* www.gel.com Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation 4
P.O. Box 30712 . Charleston, SC 29417 - 2040 Savage Road (29407)
Health Physics Procedure m075w54f/
Phone (843) 556-8171 - FaYI843) 766-1178
GPP-GGGR-R5104-003-Attachment B-CY-001 Major I.-Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Chain of Custody Form No. 2006-00441 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556 Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning Analyses Requested Lab Use Only Contact Name & Phone: Comments: Jack McCarthy 860-267-3924 Analytical Lab (Name, City, State)General Engineering Laboratories 2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407 0 < , 843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones C d) Z Priority:_L-3 D. X 14 D. El 7 D. Container Sample Size-Media Type &Type Sample Designation Date Time Code Code Code Comment, Preservation Lab Sample ID 9106-0007-018F 6-27-06 1,&#xfd;15" SE C BP -_9106-0007-019F 6-27-06 1-3,i31 SE C BP X -9106-0007-020F 6-27-06 J3,&#xfd; If' SE C BP ( _ &deg;9106-0007-021F 6-27-06 1t3o SE C BP ), _ " 00f u3fb2.NOTES: PO 4: 002332 MSR #: 06-/O SSWP# NA SLTP QA Dl Radwaste QA[] Non QA I) Relinq ed Date/Time
* www.gel.com
: 2) Received By DateiTim/e 3),Relinquished By Date/Time
 
: 4) Rceivec}\y Date/Time&t~4:Am( 4, * /44~ \~ u ~ -Samples Shipped Via: Z Fed Ex L] ups[] Hand E] Other Bill of Lading #Internal Container Temp.: 2_. Deg. C Custody Seale)d?Y 0 N Custody Seal Intact?YO NO]I ENJ~ SAMPLE RECEIPT &RVIEWT FORM 01P47RW" P useonly Client (y~y~\Qj~.
Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation 4
SDGARCOC/Work Order: (t1 'S Date Received:
 
__ __ __ __ _ PM(A) Review ( ns-couftir are resolved prior to siping): Received By: )7,/__ _.Sample Receipt Criteria Comments/Qualifir (Required for Non-Conforming Items)Shipping containers received intact Cicle Applicable:
Health Physics Procedure                                                                                 GPP-GGGR-R5104-003-Attachment B-CY-001 Major m075w54f/*
sals broken damaged oer leaking comainerethe (describe) and sealed? / .rco li c rr Samples requiring cold Circl Coolant # ice bags blue ice dry ice odier describe)2 preservation within (4 +/- 2 C)? /__ .Record preservation method. U-4__ '_.___ ._ J Chain of custody documents included with shipment?
I.-
_Sample containers intact and Circle Applicable:
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company                                                   Chain of Custody Form                         No. 2006-00441 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556 Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning                                                   Analyses Requested         Lab Use Only Contact Name & Phone:                                                                                                   Comments:
seals broken damaged eominer leaking contaier otder (describe) sealed? ___Samples requiring chemical Sample 's. conuiaers affected ard ose pte preservation at proper pH?VOA vials free of headspace Samnle ID's and comain affected: (defined as < 6mm bubble)?Are Encore containers present?7 (If yes. immediately deliver to VOA laboratory)
Jack McCarthy 860-267-3924 Analytical Lab (Name, City, State)
Samples received within holding Id's and tes affecwd: time? /Sample ID's on COC match ID's sale ID's and containers affected:
General Engineering Laboratories 2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407                                               0     <             ,
I on bottles? .\ _._ __.Date & time on COC match date Sample ID's affected:& time on bottles? _Number of containers received Sample ID's affected: match number indicated on COC?COC form is properly signed in relinquished/received sections?
843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones                                                               C   d)   Z Priority:_L-3 D. X 14 D.       El 7 D.                                     Container Sample     Size-Media     Type     &Type Sample Designation               Date         Time     Code     Code     Code                                           Comment, Preservation   Lab Sample ID 9106-0007-018F                 6-27-06       1,&#xfd;15"       SE       C       BP 00f                                                                                                                        -                                     _
I '_ __'Air Bill ,Tracking  
u3fb2. 9106-0007-019F                 6-27-06       1-3,i31     SE       C       BP     X                               -
#'s, &14 Additional Comments.RSO RAD Receipt_____  
9106-0007-020F                 6-27-06       J3,&#xfd; If'     SE       C       BP       (   _       &deg; 9106-0007-021F                 6-27-06       1t3o         SE       C       BP     ),   _       "
#______Suspected Hazard~ Inomto *if > x2 area background is observed o~isaimles identifed as -non-Suspected Hazard Information jregulatedlion-radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety group for further x investigation.
NOTES: PO 4: 002332 MSR #: 06-/O                   SSWP# NA             SLTP QA     Dl Radwaste QA     [] Non QA         Samples Shipped Via:  Internal Container Z Fed Ex            Temp.: 2_.Deg. C L] ups
S diinlnaio al Cl rtin i I ..... ..... .. ...n = f-IIV I i .i i S~i l Z Ubserved=:
[] Hand                Custody Seale)d?
U.n IB PCB Regulated?
Y 0      N I) Relinq    ed                              Date/Time         2) Received By                          DateiTim/e                              Custody Seal Intact?
'Ihipped as DO I Hazardous CiMaterial?
E] Other 3),Relinquished By                            Date/Time          4) Rceivec}\y                           Date/Time                                     YO      NO]
If yes, contact Waste-Manager or ESH Manager.Obseved* -._______________
                            &t~4:Am(                   *4, /44~                                     \~ uI
I f PM (or PMA) review of Hazard classif;C26011:
                                                                                                                    ~     -       Bill of Lading #
Inifials ate* 'Zf -r-PM (o PMA rvie-o'Haar clsi---n Iiil ( kl-,'1 fl2.... -t 'I'-T w I t:)V SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM CONTINUATION FORM 3-1-z~o -W..#0 4 atL -I D W&#xfd;U- Fe-CLe14L-DVQ4 Mai&#xfd; 41V~ Owq4 7 Connecticut Yankee Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Services -CY-ISC-SOW-O-l Figure 1. Sample Check-in List.D ate-T i m" ". R eceived: --..- (. .SDG#: ",.5I: 1iOg " .Work Order Number:__-___
 
_ ___ __ __ __ __ _ _ __ __ __Shipping Cdhtaincr I D*Q(-,CC k'I WAVS\2.Q<
ENJ~            SAMPLE RECEIPT &RVIEWT FORM 01P47RW"                                                                       P       useonly Client     (y~y~\Qj~.                                 SDGARCOC/Work Order:                                                       (t1 'S Date Received:                     __         __     __       __     _ PM(A) Review (                     ns-couftir                         are resolved prior to siping):
Chain of Custody # S~e ctb* I~i Oe-2+1. Custody Seals on shipping container intact?:.. -Yes ( J No kf 2. Custody Seals dated and signed? .-.Yes[ ].No [ ]./ .3. Chain-of-Custody record present? Yesyf Not]4. Cooler temperature (zY r .5. Vermiculite/packing materials is: Wet ([ Dry t' -6.: Number of samples in shipping container: -o 7. Sample holding times exceeded?
Received       By:                           )7,/__           _.
Yes [ No 8. Samples have:Itape -hazard labels..." *Custody seals "" appropriate sample labels 9. Samples are:'.e, in good condition  
Sample Receipt Criteria                                                 Comments/Qualifir (Required for Non-Conforming Items) leaking comainerethe (describe)
-"j eaking broken -have air bubbles 10. Were any anomalies identified in sample receipt? Yes [ No r I. .Description of anomalies, (include sample numbers): S~ample Custodian/Laboratory:
Shipping containers received intact and sealed?                                          /          .
CK) D : Telephoned to: On By -.OnBY." .. -.8 RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS 9 Radiochemistry Case Narrative Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co. (YANK)Work Order 167554 Method/Analysis Information Product: Analytical Method: Prep Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Sample ID 167554001 167554002 167554003 167554004 1201142442 1201142443 1201142444 Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS 226 Ingrowth Waived EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 Dry Soil Prep 551072 550535 Client ID 9106-0007-018F 9106-0007-019F 9106-0007-02OF 9106-0007-021F Method Blank (MB)167554001(9106-0007-018F)
Cicle Applicable: sals broken damaged oer rco                                                         li         c       rr Samples requiring cold                                                 Circl Coolant # ice bags                 blue ice               dry ice                     odier describe) 2 preservation within (4 +/- 2 C)?                       /__                                                         U-4__ ._    J
Sample Duplicate (DUP)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-0 13 REV# 11.Calibration Information:
                                                                                                                                                                              .
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Record preservation method.                                                                     '_.___
Chain of custody documents included with shipment?                                               _
Sample containers intact and                                         Circle Applicable: seals broken damaged eominer leaking contaier                       otder (describe) sealed?                                                               ___
Samples requiring chemical                                           Sample     's.conuiaers affected ard ose               pte preservation at           proper pH?
VOA       vials     free of headspace                               Samnle ID's and comain         affected:
(defined as < 6mm bubble)?
Are Encore containers present?
7 (If yes. immediately deliver to VOA laboratory)
Samples received within holding                                     Id's and tes affecwd:
time?                                             /
Sample ID's on COC match ID's                                         sale ID's and containers affected:                       I on bottles?                                                                             *,      .           \
* _._                           __.
Date & time on COC match date                                       Sample ID's affected:
        & time on bottles?                                                   _
Number of containers received                                       Sample ID's affected:
match number indicated on COC?
COC form is properly signed in relinquished/received sections?                 I                                         '_                                                         __'
Air Bill ,Tracking #'s, &
14 Additional Comments
                                                                      . RSO RAD Receipt_____         #______
Suspected Hazard~     Inomto                             *if> x2 area background is observed o~isaimles identifed as -non-Suspected Hazard Information
* jregulatedlion-radioactive",           contact the Radiation Safety group for further x   0:*      investigation.
S       diinlnaioal        Cl       rtin                   i     I   .....     .   .     .   ..         ..     . .         .
n   =           f-IIV I   i .i     i S~i     l           Z                                         Ubserved=:       f*,f)v'it'i            U.n Obseved*
I
                                                                                                                                  -.
f
_______________
          'Ihipped as DO I Hazardous IB PCB Regulated?
CiMaterial? If yes, contact Waste
    -Manager         or ESH Manager.
PM (or PMA) review of Hazard classif;C26011:                                         Inifials                                     ate*           'Zf -r-PM(o PMA rvie-o'Haar clsi---n                                                     Iiil               (   kl-,'1             fl2....       -t     'I'-T w                     I t:)                                       V
 
SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM CONTINUATION FORM 3-1-z~o -                       0 t*-ooW..#
4
      -            atL               ID W&#xfd;U-   Fe-CLe14L-DVQ4 Mai&#xfd; 41V~                           Owq4 7
 
Connecticut Yankee
                                                                                                -CY-ISC-SOW-O-l Services Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Figure 1. Sample Check-in List.
(.                  .
Date-Ti m" ".R eceived: -     - ..-
              ",.5I: 1 O*,-"   iOg      "    .
SDG#:
_   ___       __     __   __   __       _   _     __       __   __
Work Order Number:__-___
k'I Shipping Cdhtaincr I D*Q(-,CCWAVS\2.Q<                     Chain of Custody # S~e ctb*               I~i Oe-2+
: 1.       Custody Seals on shipping container intact?:..                       -Yes ( J No kf
                                                                              -.Yes[ ].No         [ ]./           .
: 2.        Custody Seals dated and signed?          .
Chain-of-Custody record present?                                     Yesyf Not]
3.
: 4.       Cooler temperature     -2*Q      (zY     .r Vermiculite/packing materials is:
Wet ([ Dry t'           -
5.
r3/4*    S*;,A--          o 6.:     Number of samples in shipping container:
Sample holding times exceeded?                                       Yes [       No 7.
: 8. Samples have:
            *Itape                               -hazard   labels
            ..." *Custody seals         ""     *appropriate sample labels
: 9. Samples are:'
            .e, in good condition           -       "j eaking broken                           -have air bubbles Yes [      No      r
: 10. Were any anomalies identified in sample receipt?
I. .Description   of anomalies, (include sample numbers):
D    :              CK)
S~ample Custodian/Laboratory:
By                                  .
Telephoned to:                                       On                                 -
                ."       ..
OnBY                        - .8
 
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS 9
 
Radiochemistry Case Narrative Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co. (YANK)
Work Order 167554 Method/Analysis Information Product:                       Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS 226 Ingrowth Waived Analytical Method:              EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 Prep Method:                    Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:        551072 Prep Batch Number:              550535 Sample ID        Client ID 167554001      9106-0007-018F 167554002      9106-0007-019F 167554003      9106-0007-02OF 167554004      9106-0007-021F 1201142442      Method Blank (MB) 1201142443      167554001(9106-0007-018F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201142444      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-0 13 REV# 11.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.10 Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 167554001 (9106-0007-018F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
10
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Sample 1201142443 (9106-0007-018F) was recounted due to a peak shift.Miscellaneous Information:
 
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 167554001 (9106-0007-018F).
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Additional Comments The sample and the duplicate, 1201142443 (9106-0007-018F) and 167554001 (9106-0007-018F), did not meet the relative percent difference for Ac-228, however, they do meet the relative error ratio requirement with a value of 2.48.Qualifier information Qualifier Reason Analyte Sample UI Data rejected due to low abundance.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Bismuth-214 167554003 Cesium-134 167554001 1201142443 Niobium-94 1201142442 Method/Analysis Information 11 Product: GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: EPA 905.0 Modified Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 550821 550536 550535 Sample ID 167554001 167554002 167554003 167554004 1201141750 1201141751 1201141752 1201141753 Client ID 9106-0007-018F 9106-0007-019F 9106-0007-020F 9106-0007-021F Method Blank (MB)167554004(9106-0007-021 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP)167554004(9106-0007-021 F) Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-004 REV# 10.Calibration Information:
Technical Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Sample 1201142443 (9106-0007-018F) was recounted due to a peak shift.
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments The sample and the duplicate, 1201142443 (9106-0007-018F) and 167554001 (9106-0007-018F), did not meet the relative percent difference for Ac-228, however, they do meet the relative error ratio requirement with a value of 2.48.
Qualifier information Qualifier                   Reason                       Analyte       Sample UI           Data rejected due to low abundance.     Bismuth-214   167554003 Cesium-134     167554001 1201142443 Niobium-94     1201142442 Method/Analysis Information 11
 
Product:                                           GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                 EPA 905.0 Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           550821 Prep Batch Number:                                 550536 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           550535 Sample ID       Client ID 167554001      9106-0007-018F 167554002      9106-0007-019F 167554003      9106-0007-020F 167554004      9106-0007-021F 1201141750      Method Blank (MB) 1201141751      167554004(9106-0007-021 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201141752      167554004(9106-0007-021 F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201141753      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-004 REV# 10.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (OC) Information:
Quality Control (OC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 167554004 (9106-0007-021F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information 12 All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 167554004 (9106-0007-021F).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
QC Information 12
Chemical Recoveries All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.Miscellaneous Information:
 
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Chemical Recoveries All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Review Validation:
Review Validation:
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator.
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.
In addition, all data designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:
Reviewer/Date:
Reviewer/Date:                                           e         -
e -13 SAMPLE DATA  
13
 
SAMPLE DATA


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
14 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report for YANKOO Connecticut
 
14
 
GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report for YANKOO Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.
Client SDG: MSR#06-1035 GEL Work Order: 167554 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
**  Analyte is a surrogate compound U    Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.
UI  Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification ND    The analyte concentration is


==Dear Mr. McCarthy:==
==Dear Mr. McCarthy:==
General Engineering Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the following analytical results for the sample(s) we received on July 21, 2006 and May 24, 2006. This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures.
General Engineering Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the following analytical results for the sample(s) we received on July 21, 2006 and May 24, 2006. This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (843) 556-8171, ext. 4243.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (843) 556-8171, ext. 4243.Sincerely, Cheryl Jones Project Manager Purchase Order: 002332 Chain of Custody: 2006-00363 and 2006-00441 Enclosures P.O. BOX 30712 Cherleston, SC 29417 -2040 Savage Road (29407)Phone (843) 556-81 71 -Fax (843) 766-1178 www.gel.com Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.Soils PO# 002332 Work Order: 175290 SDG: MSR#06-1310 Laboratory ID Client ID 175290001 9106-0007-014F 175290002 9106-0007-021 F
Sincerely, Cheryl Jones Project Manager Purchase Order: 002332 Chain of Custody: 2006-00363 and 2006-00441 Enclosures P.O. BOX 30712 Cherleston, SC 29417 - 2040 Savage Road (29407)
Table of Contents General Narrative  
Phone (843) 556-81 71 - Fax (843) 766-1178 www.gel.com
..................................................................
 
1 Chain of Custody ..................................................................
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.
4 Data Review Qualifier Flag Definitions  
Soils PO# 002332 Work Order: 175290 SDG: MSR#06-1310 Laboratory ID   Client ID 175290001       9106-0007-014F 175290002       9106-0007-021 F
..............................
 
13 Radiological Analysis ..........................................................
Table of Contents General Narrative .................................................................. 1 Chain of Custody .................................................................. 4 Data Review Qualifier Flag Definitions ..............................               13 Radiological Analysis .......................................................... 15 Sample Data Summary .....................................................         47 Quality Control Data ........................................................... 55
15 Sample Data Summary .....................................................
 
47 Quality Control Data ...........................................................
General Narrative 1
55 General Narrative 1 General Narrative for Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.Work Order: 175290 SDG: MSR#06-1310 November 06, 2006 Laboratory Identification:
 
General Engineering Laboratories, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, South Carolina 29407 (843) 556-8171 Summary Sample receipt The samples arrived at General Engineering Laboratories, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on July 21, 2006 and May 24, 2006 for analysis.
General Narrative for Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.
Shipping container temperatures were checked, documented, and within specifications.
Work Order: 175290 SDG: MSR#06-1310 November 06, 2006 Laboratory Identification:
The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures.
General Engineering Laboratories, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, South Carolina 29407 (843) 556-8171 Summary Sample receipt The samples arrived at General Engineering Laboratories, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on July 21, 2006 and May 24, 2006 for analysis. Shipping container temperatures were checked, documented, and within specifications. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage.
All sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage.Sample Identification The laboratory received the following samples: Laboratory Sample Identification Description 175290001 9106-0007-014F 175290002 9106-0007-021F Items of Note At the request of Dale Randall via email on 10/31/06, the samples listed above we relogged for additional tests.Case Narrative Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in General Engineering Laboratories (GEL)Standard Operating Procedures.
Sample Identification The laboratory received the following samples:
Any technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical case narratives in the enclosed data package.Analytical Request Two soil samples were reanalyzed for FSSALL excluding Strontium-90 and FSSGAM.Data Package The enclosed data package contains the following sections:
Laboratory         Sample Identification     Description 175290001           9106-0007-014F 175290002           9106-0007-021F Items of Note At the request of Dale Randall via email on 10/31/06, the samples listed above we relogged for additional tests.
General Narrative, Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation, Data Review Qualifier Definitions, and data from the following fractions:
Case Narrative Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in General Engineering Laboratories (GEL)
Radiochemistry.
Standard Operating Procedures. Any technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical case narratives in the enclosed data package.
Analytical Request Two soil samples were reanalyzed for FSSALL excluding Strontium-90 and FSSGAM.
Data Package The enclosed data package contains the following sections: General Narrative, Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation, Data Review Qualifier Definitions, and data from the following fractions: Radiochemistry.
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the SOW, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hard copy data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or a designee, as verified by the following signature.
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the SOW, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hard copy data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or a designee, as verified by the following signature.
Project Manager GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.P.O. BOX 30712 Charleston, SC 29417 -2040 Savage Road (29407)Phone (843) 556-8171 -FaxY43) 766-1178 www.gel.com List of current GEL Certifications as of 01 November 2006 State Certification Alaska UST-062 Arizona AZ0668 Arkansas 88-0651 CLIA L 42D0904046 California 01 151CA Colorado L GenEngLabs Connecticut PH-0169 Dept. of Navy NFESC 413 EPA WG-15J Florida/NELAP E87156 Georgia E87156 (FL/NELAP)
Project Manager GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.
Hawaii N/A Idaho N/A Illinois 200029 Indiana C-SC-01 Kansas E-10332 Kentucky 90129 Louisiana 03046 Maryland 270 Massachusetts M-SCO12 Michigan 9903 Nevada SC12 New Jersey SCO02 New Mexico FL NELAP E87156 New York 11501 North Carolina 233 North Carolina Drinking W 45709 North Dakota R-158 Oklahoma 9904 Pennsylvania 68-00485 South Carolina 10120001/10585001/10120002 Tennessee 02934 Texas TX213-2006A Texas NELAP T104704235-06-TX U.S. Dept. of Agriculture S-52597 US Army Corps of Engineer f N/A Utah [ 8037697376 GEL Vermont F VT87156 Virginia 1 00151 Washington C1641 3 Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation 4
P.O. BOX 30712 Charleston, SC 29417 - 2040 Savage Road (29407)
recJ -7 9Q'O Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5104-003-Attachment B-CY-001 Major Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Chain of Custody Form No. 2006-0036 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556 6,/ 62 _ .".Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning Analyses Requested 14M Contact Name & Phone: ~~I Jack McCarthy 860-267-2556 Ext. 3024 i": Analytical Lab (Name, City, State) ...General Engineering Laboratories .A .2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407 :Y : .;-, 843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones -. : .,..-Priority 30 D. M 14 D. fl7 D. Cnanr. ~. iS_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ S a m p le S i z e- .,,. , A< 4... , i. "'Media Type &TyVe -Sample Designation Date Time Code Code Code Comment, Preservatin IA'9106-0007-007F 5/08/06 15:11 SE C BP x x Transferred from COC 2006-00329  
Phone (843) 556-8171 - FaxY43) 766-1178 www.gel.com
/ 4, 9106-0007-008F 5/09/06 10:39 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 a 9106-0007-01 IF 5/09/06 09:43 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 9106-0007-012F 5/09/06 13:27 SE C BP X K Transferred from COC 2006-00334 ..9106-0007-013F 5/09/06 13:53 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00334
 
.9106-0007-013FS 5/09/06 14:13 SE C BP x x Transferredfrom COC 2006-00334 j 9106-0007-014F 5/09/06 14:13 SE C BP x x Transferred from COC 2006-00334  
List of current GEL Certifications as of 01 November 2006 State                       Certification Alaska                         UST-062 Arizona                           AZ0668 Arkansas                           88-0651 CLIA               L       42D0904046 California                       01 151CA Colorado             L       GenEngLabs Connecticut                       PH-0169 Dept. of Navy                     NFESC 413 EPA                           WG-15J Florida/NELAP                         E87156 Georgia                   E87156 (FL/NELAP)
-&1\k 9106-0007-015F 5/16/06 07:56 SE C BP X x Transferred from COC 2006-00353 NOTES: PO #: 002332 MSR#: 06- O't3 SSWP#NA [ LTP QA D RadwasteQA E Non QA Samples Shipped Via: UPS [] Hander 1). 'linquisl]
Hawaii                               N/A Idaho                             N/A Illinois                         200029 Indiana                         C-SC-01 Kansas                           E-10332 Kentucky                           90129 Louisiana                           03046 Maryland                             270 Massachusetts                     M-SCO12 Michigan                             9903 Nevada                             SC12 New Jersey                           SCO02 New Mexico                   FL NELAP E87156 New York                             11501 North Carolina                           233 North Carolina Drinking W                   45709 North Dakota                         R-158 Oklahoma                             9904 Pennsylvania                       68-00485 South Carolina             10120001/10585001/10120002 Tennessee                           02934 Texas                       TX213-2006A Texas NELAP                   T104704235-06-TX U.S. Dept. of Agriculture                 S-52597 US Army Corps of Engineer   f                 N/A Utah             [       8037697376 GEL Vermont             F           VT87156 Virginia           1               00151 Washington                           C1641 3
Date/Timne
 
:2) R eiv ,." Byt Date/Time ........ 5 lf O he Bill of Lading #Vq21 6573 6 W SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM PM use only Client: tSDG/ARCOC/Wor Order: Date Received:
Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation 4
PM(A) Review (eusure n-con are resolved prior to signing): Received By: Sample Receipt Criteria ZO Comments/Qualifiers (Required for Non-Conforming Items)Shipping containers received intact rircle Applicable:
 
seals broken damaged container leaking container other (describe) 1 and sealed?Samples requiring cold Circle Coolant # ice bags blue Ice dry ice e other describe)2 preservation within (4 +/- 2 C)?_Record preservation method.Chain of custody documents lincluded with shipment?4 Sample containers intact and Circle Applicable:
recJ             -7     9Q'O Health Physics Procedure                                                                                         GPP-GGGR-R5104-003-Attachment B-CY-001 Major Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company                                                             Chain of Custody Form                                         No. 2006-0036 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556                                             6,/ 62
seals broken damaged container leaking centainer other (describe) sealed?Samples requiring chemical Sample 1D's, containers affected and observed pH: p reservation at proper pH? -6 VOA vials free of headspace Sample D's and containers affected:-(defined as < 6mm bubble)?Are Encore containers present?7 (If yes, immediately deliver to VOA laborator__
_     .".
8 Samples received within holding Id's and tests affected: time?9 Sample ID's on COC match ID's Sample ID's ard containers affected: on bottles?Date & time on COC match date Sample ID's affected:& time on bottles? _11 Number of containers received Sample tD's affected: match number indicated on COC?12 COC form is properly signed in relinquished/received sections?Air Bill ,Tracking  
Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning                                                               Analyses Requested       14M Contact Name & Phone:                                                                 ~~I Jack McCarthy 860-267-2556 Ext. 3024                                                                                                               i":         i*:'                        *'
#'s, &1 4 Additional Comments ,7 :5v/fIRSO RAD Receipt #__Suspected Hazard Infrmation 0 1f > x2 area background is observed on samples identified as Z regulated/non-radioactivew, contact the Radiation Safety group for further_ investigation.
Analytical Lab (Name, City, State)                                                                                                                                   .       .             .
XJRadiological:
General Engineering Laboratories                                                                   .A                               .
lassifiCation?
2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407                                                                                                       : :Y .                :s* ;-,
Maximum Counts Observed*:
843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones                                                                                                 -.                   : .,..-
40 B JPUB Regulated?
Priority           30 D. M 14 D. fl7 D.                                               Cnanr.                                                       ~.               iS S_am_ p_le _ _   Si
12Comments:
_ _ z_e-_                                 .                                  ,  i. "'                  ,,.
9m1WR as '. r Hazardous C [Material?
                                                                                                                                                                                                    ,A<   4...
If yes, contact Waste 6 Hazard Class Shipped: FManager or ESH Manager. UN#: PM (or PMA) review of Hazard classification:
Media     Type         &TyVe                                                                                               -
Initials Date: 6 Connecticut Yankee Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Services -CY-ISC-SOW-O01 Figure 1. -Sample Check-in List.Date/Time Received-  
Sample Designation                       Date       Time       Code     Code           Code                                           Comment, Preservatin                                         IA' 9106-0007-007F                       5/08/06       15:11     SE         C             BP       x           x               Transferred from COC 2006-00329                     /       4, 9106-0007-008F                       5/09/06       10:39     SE         C             BP       X           X                 Transferred from COC 2006-00334 a 9106-0007-01 IF                       5/09/06       09:43     SE         C             BP       X           X                 Transferred from COC 2006-00334 9106-0007-012F                       5/09/06       13:27     SE         C             BP       X           K                 Transferred from COC 2006-00334                     *            ..
~~C 4 SDG#: -073,b Work Order Number- ___________________
9106-0007-013F                       5/09/06       13:53       SE         C             BP       X             X               Transferred from COC 2006-00334 5/09/06       14:13     SE                       BP C .9106-0007-013FS    x            x                Transferredfrom COC2006-00334 j   9106-0007-014F                       5/09/06       14:13       SE         C             BP       x             x                 Transferred from COC 2006-00334                 -   &1
*Shipping Cdntainer I Chain of Custody tQUA~e. Zi, I Custody Seals odahipping container intact?... -Yes 4No (J 2. Custody Seals dated and signed? Yes',J/ No [ ]-3. Chain-of-Custody record pr&#xfd;sent? yeskfNol[4. Cooler em-perature C*.5. Verrticulite/packing materials is: Wet [ 3 Dry '\ J .6.: Numberofsarnples in shipping container:. " ___'7- Sample holding times e.xceeded?
\k 9106-0007-015F                         5/16/06       07:56       SE         C             BP       X             x                 Transferred from COC 2006-00353 NOTES: PO #: 002332 MSR#: 06- O't3                       SSWP#NA               [     LTP QA       D RadwasteQA     E   Non QA           Samples Shipped Via:
Yes [ j No 8. Samples have_"-a.ehazard labels-/-Custody seals appropriate sample labels----A good condition  
UPS                             **
-_._leaking  
1). 'linquisl]                                     Date/Timne         :2) R eiv         Byt ,."                   Date/Time             [] Hander                            *
':-.brokn " '" " have air bubbles 1 0. I We any anomalies in sample receipt? "es No f ]il" .:Description of anomalies (include sample numbers): "" ampie " "diWabr.. *. oatory~Da.t..
                    ........                                         5                             lf                                               Ohe Bill of Lading #
*"Telephoned to .". _ _ _ O .. y 7 GPP-GGGR-R5 104-003 -Attachment B-CY-00 Major Health Physics Procedure Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Chain of Custody Form No. 2006-00441 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556 Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning Analyses Requested Lab Use Only Contact Name & Phone: 1 Comments: Jack McCarthy 860-267-3924 i Analytical Lab (Name, City, State)General Engineering Laboratories 2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407 843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones V .Priority: 0 D. Z 14 D. El 7 D. Container Sample Size-Media Type &Type Sample Designation Date Time Code Code Code Comment, Preservation Lab Sample ID 9106-0007-018F 6-27-06 /,,' SE C BP X" I X 9106-0007-019F 6-27-06 3' SE C BP " -_9106-0007-020F 6-27-06 i3,. 4F SE C BP M _" 9106-0007-021F 6.27-06 j SE C BP )" _NOTES: P04: 002332 MSR 9: 06- /0 -; SSWP# NA Z LTP QA El Radwaste QA F- Non QA 1) Relinq Date/Time.
Vq21 6573 6 W
: 2) Received By Date/Time 3),Felinquished By D i 6 /Tire 4) R.eceivedRy Date/Time 7715/4 Samples Shipped Via:[ Fed Ex El ups El Hand 0l Other Bill of Lading #1O 5 7 !{ 04 u Internal Container Temp.: IL Deg. C Custody Seale/d?Y U NZ Custody Seal Intact?YF] N 0 qyN64 RCEP & REVIEW, FORM SSAMPLEREIP
 
'0 lO I IM a." only cuesut:(Q\.j~'~.A~L.
SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM PM use only Client:                                                                           Order:                                        tSDG/ARCOC/Wor Date Received:                                         PM(A) Review (eusure n-con                         are resolved prior to signing):
SMGARCOC/Work Order- (1 5 IDateReceied:
Received By:
\~\~ ~PM(A) Review (es~no*n f~rM g.U o are) reotved prior to uigulnW:[Received BY:" I -_ _ _ _ _*_ I -.Sample Receipt Criteria Z CommentslQualirwrs (Requirid for Non-Conforning Items)IShipping containers received ifitact Crcle APp.icable:
Sample Receipt Criteria               ZO             Comments/Qualifiers (Required for Non-Conforming Items) rircle Applicable: seals broken damaged container   leaking container other (describe)
seals bioken da.,-d c .nsiaer l kakieg maimr odti (describe) land sealed? -, Samples requiring cold ti.k Ccah ice ag, s ba I, dr ,ze d e)2 preservation within (4 +/- 2 C)? / -, Record preservation method. _ Cc .i.SChain of custody documents included with shipment?  
Shipping containers received intact 1 and sealed?
.Sample containers intact and Circle A^icable:
Samples requiring cold                           Circle Coolant #     ice bags       blue Ice       dry ice           e     other describe) 2 preservation within (4 +/- 2 C)?
sob broken damged i leaking conaier oier (describe) 4scaled?-Samples requiring chemical sample IVS, Omi=I aftecitl pr preservation at proper pH?VOA vials free of headspace mple ID's ad containers affected: (defined as < 6mn Are Encore containers present?7 (If yes, immediately deliver to V O A l a b o r a t o r y ) .__ -------- -- ---_Samples received within holding Id's 3ad sea affied: lime? _Iuncl ID's andI comainer uffecret: Sample ID's on COC match ID's / 1 a &#xa3;ue a on bottles? : .,, f, i .q, Date & time on COC match date Sample ID's affectedt:
_Record     preservation method.
& time on bottles? _Number of containers received /mple ID's aff(cied: match number indicated on COC?COC form is property signed in /12 relinquished/received sections? , __Air Bill ,Tracking Fs, &Additional Comments _-a RSO RAID RceiptD__#_
Chain of custody documents lincluded with shipment?
Suspected Hazard Inrormation 1 -n--l I actw= the Pradiation Safety group for firther[ investigation.-A Rio0logical.Classification?
4 Sample containers intact and                       Circle Applicable: seals broken damaged container leaking centainer   other (describe) sealed?
Maximum Counts Observed*e:  
Samples requiring chemical                       Sample 1D's, containers affected and observed pH:
*_ __ ___ _10 i PCB Regulated?
preservation at proper pH?                   -
Shfipped as DUPI Hazardous C IMaterial?
Sample D's and containers affected:
If yes, contact Waste Hazard Class Shipped:-Manager or ESH Manager. 01-: i PM (or PMA) review of lazard classiticaimn..
6 VOA vials free of headspace
Initials I e: :{-z V)9 SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM CONTINUATION FORM'-o -_Vc-I1Z2l 'C Zc :W O F t0LJl4 Ef~ds ObqLW-10 Connecticut Yankee Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Services Figure 1. Sample Check-in List.Date/rime Received:  
- (defined as < 6mm bubble)?
)'\ ( .-" "*D#: 'A: .C 10 .5 Work Order Number: __/ __._ ___ _" Shipping Cdbtainer ,,QL C Vk .R ,QL .Chain of Custody*#
Are Encore containers present?
ecD
7 (If yes, immediately deliver to VOA laborator__
* CIY*. _'1. Custody Seals. oi shipping container intact?,.., Yes [] No j4 2. Custody Seals dated and signed? Yes [j No [4 3. Chain-of-Custody record present? YesJ 1 4No [ I 4. Cooler temperature 2 C .fYX.5. :Vermiculite/packing materials -is: Wet (IDry [ 4~6. -Number of samples in shipping container:  
Id's and tests affected:
'. (x .\'3-\ -.7. Sample. hoding times exceeded?
Samples  received within holding 8  time?
Yes [ No 8., Samples have:, Z/. ustody seals....___hazard labels..eappropriate sample labels 9. Samples are:* good condition  
9 Sample ID's on COC match ID's                     Sample ID's ard containers affected:
._.."leaking
on bottles?
..........
Date & time on COC match date                   Sample ID's affected:
brken..........javc air bubbles 10. Were any anomalies identified in ple receipt? Yes[jNo 11.. D -escription of anomalies (include sample numbers): S.ample Custodian/Laberatory:iK,'. , Date.-]C\lL_
    & time on bottles?                                 _
* -Telephoned to: On By______________________
11  Number of containers received                   Sample tD's affected:
11 ---
match number indicated on COC?
HTD analyses  
12 COC form is properly signed in relinquished/received sections?
Air Bill ,Tracking #'s, &
14
                                          ,7                               :5v/
Additional Comments
                                            *'~    RSO RAD Receipt #__
fI Suspected Hazard Infrmation                         1f > x2 area background is observed on samples identified as *otn-Z0        regulated/non-radioactivew,       contact the Radiation Safety group for further
_      investigation.
XJRadiological: lassifiCation?                   Maximum Counts Observed*:                                 40 B JPUB Regulated?                         12Comments:
9m1WR as '. r Hazardous C [Material? If yes, contact Waste       6         Hazard Class Shipped:
FManager or ESH Manager.                         UN#:
PM (or PMA) review of Hazard classification:                     Initials                         Date:
6
 
Connecticut Yankee Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Services                                             -CY-ISC-SOW-O01 Figure 1. -Sample Check-in List.
Date/Time Received- ~~C             4 SDG#:                                               -073,b Work Order Number-               ___________________
        *Shipping Cdntainer I                                       Chain of Custody tQUA~e.         Zi, I       Custody Seals odahipping container intact?...                     -Yes   4No (J
: 2.       Custody Seals dated and signed?
Yes',J/   No [ ]
      - 3.         Chain-of-Custody record pr&#xfd;sent?
yeskfNol[
: 4.       Cooler em-perature                   C*.
: 5.       Verrticulite/packing materials is:
Wet [   3 Dry '\ J       .
6.:       Numberofsarnples in shipping container:.         "     ___'
7-       Sample holding times e.xceeded?
Yes [ j No
: 8. Samples have_"
                                                      -a.ehazard labels
                  -/-Custody seals                       appropriate sample labels
                  ---- A good condition                 -_._leaking ':-.
brokn       *, "       '" "     have air bubbles
: 10.       IWe    any anomalies identifie*w in sample receipt?     "es               No   f]
il" . :Description of anomalies (include sample numbers):
"" ampie
                      .. oatory~Da.t..
                                    *.                                                                    "  "diWabr
*"Telephoned to .           ".               ___      O ..                   y 7
 
Health Physics Procedure                                                                                    GPP-GGGR-R5 104-003 -Attachment B-CY-00     Major Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company                                                       Chain of Custody Form                         No. 2006-00441 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556 Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning                                                       Analyses Requested       Lab Use Only Contact Name & Phone:                                                                                             1     Comments:
Jack McCarthy 860-267-3924                                                                                         i Analytical Lab (Name, City, State)
General Engineering Laboratories 2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407 843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones                                                         V             .
Priority: .*  0 D. Z   14 D. El 7 D.                                     Container Sample     Size-Media   Type     &Type Sample Designation               Date         Time       Code     Code     Code                                           Comment, Preservation         Lab Sample ID 9106-0007-018F                 6-27-06       /,,'       SE       C         BP         X" I         X 9106-0007-019F                 6-27-06             3'     SE       C         BP           "     -_
9106-0007-020F                 6-27-06       i3,. 4F       SE       C         BP       M                                                             _"
9106-0007-021F                 6.27-06     j   ,o*      SE       C         BP       )"   _
NOTES: P04: 002332 MSR 9: 06- /0 -; SSWP# NA                           Z   LTP QA       El Radwaste QA       F- Non QA       Samples Shipped Via:      Internal Container
[ Fed Ex                Temp.: IL Deg. C El ups El Hand                    Custody Seale/d?
YU    NZ
: 1) Relinq                                     Date/Time.         2) Received By                             Date/Time                                 Custody Seal Intact?
0l Other 3),Felinquished By                           D6    /Tire i          4) R.eceivedRy                             Date/Time                                       YF]    N 0 7715/4                                   &#xfd;*?  of Lading Bill 1O        #
5 7 !{   04 u
 
qyN64                                    RCEP                          & REVIEW, FORM SSAMPLEREIP
            '0lO I                                                                                              IM a." only IDateReceied:
_  __ _*_
_
cuesut:(Q\.j~'~.A~L.
                        \~\~                       ~PM(A)
SMGARCOC/Work Order-Review (es~no*n (1    5 f~rM o g.U are)reotved prior to uigulnW:
[Received BY:"                     I-             .            I   -
Sample Receipt Criteria                     Z                     CommentslQualirwrs (Requirid for Non-Conforning Items)
IShipping containers received ifitact                             Crcle APp.icable: seals bioken da.,-d c .nsiaer       l kakieg   maimr odti (describe) land sealed?                                         -
    , Samples requiring cold                                           ti.k Ccah         ice ag, s         ba I,             dr                     ,ze d       e) 2 preservation within (4 +/- 2 C)?             /                                             -                       ,
Record preservation method.                             _                       Cc         . i.
SChain of custody documents included with shipment?                                                                             .
Sample containers intact and                                   Circle A^icable: sob broken damged               i     leaking conaier oier (describe) 4scaled?-
Samples requiring chemical                                     sample IVS,   Omi=I   aftecitl a*.
                                                                                                      *oberv        pr preservation at proper pH?
VOA vials free of headspace                                       mpleID's ad containers affected:
(defined as < 6mn bubbl?*
Are Encore containers present?
7 (If yes, immediately deliver to VOA la b o ra to ry )                                                                   .__                                             - - - - - - -- -- _- --
Samples received within holding                                 Id's 3ad sea affied:
lime?                                                             _    Iuncl ID's andIcomainer uffecret:
Sample ID's on COC match ID's                             /             1 a               a                  &#xa3;ue on bottles?                             :                                     . ,,     f, i.           q, Date & time on COC match           date                       Sample ID's affectedt:
    & time on bottles?                                               _
Number of containers received             /mple                       ID's aff(cied:
match number indicated on COC?
COC form is property signed in               /
12 relinquished/received sections?                                                       ,         __
Air Bill ,Tracking Fs, &
Additional Comments
_
                                                            -a RSO RAID RceiptD__#_
Suspected Hazard Inrormation                     1   -                                                                                         n-
                                                      -l I       regulatedI/onioac*cot',                      the Pradiation Safety group for firther actw=
[     investigation.
-A Rio0logical.Classification?                                   Maximum Counts Observed*e:                           *_         __   _10
___
i PCB     Regulated?
Shfipped as DUPI Hazardous C IMaterial? If yes, contact Waste                               Hazard Class Shipped:
  -Manager or ESH Manager.                 01-:         i PM (or PMA) review of lazard classiticaimn..                                   Initials                                 Ie:     :{-z V) 9
 
SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM CONTINUATION FORM
            - '-o _Vc-I1Z2l-    Zc 2-
: 'C 9.r*  *4 O W -CO*X13-Oc F Ef~ds t0LJl4 qlo-0or*- ObqLW-10
 
Connecticut Yankee Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Services                                                   .CY-lSC-*iUW-00l Figure 1. Sample Check-in List.
Date/rime Received:               )'\                   (                 .         - "         "
                'A:              10    5 *D#:                     .C   .
Work Order Number:           __/         __._ ___                                         _"
Shipping Cdbtainer ID-* C ,,QL           Vk.R       ,QL . Chain of Custody*#             CIY*.
ecD *
* _'
: 1.         Custody Seals.oi shipping container intact?,..,                         Yes [] No j4
: 2.         Custody Seals dated and signed?                                         Yes [j No   [4
: 3.         Chain-of-Custody record present?                                       YesJ 1 4No I[
: 4.         Cooler temperature 2*        C .fYX.
: 5.       :Vermiculite/packing materials -is:                                     Wet   (IDry [       4~
: 6.       -Numberof samples in shipping container: '.               (x   *  .   \'3-\   -.
: 7.       Sample.hoding times exceeded?                                           Yes [     No 8., Samples have:,
                                              .... ___hazard labels Z/. ustody seals                  .. eappropriate sample labels
: 9. Samples are:
* good condition               ._.."leaking
                      ..........brken..........javc air bubbles
: 10.      Were any anomalies identified in          ple receipt?                Yes[jNo 11..      D    -escription of anomalies (include sample numbers):
S.ample Custodian/Laberatory:iK,'.                                    ,        Date.-]C\lL_            *    -
Telephoned to:                                        On                  By______________________
11                                 ---
 
HTD analyses


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
HTD analyses From: "Dale Randall" <randall @ cyapco.com>
HTD analyses From: "Dale Randall" <randall @cyapco.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:07:23 -0500 To: "Cheryl Jones" <cj@gel.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:07:23 -0500 To: "Cheryl Jones" <cj@gel.com>
CC: "Arthur L. Hammond" <Hammond@CYAPCO.com>, "Clyde Newson"<Newson @CYAPCO.com>
CC: "Arthur L. Hammond" <Hammond@CYAPCO.com>, "Clyde Newson"
Cheryl: Per our earlier discussion, please analyze samples 9106-0007-014F and 9106-0007-021 F to the FSSALL protocol per MSR 06-1310, with a 7 day TAT. Each of these samples were previously tested for FSSGAM and Sr-90 under MSR 06-0730 and MSR 06-1035 respectively.
        <Newson @CYAPCO.com>
Thank you for your assistance.
Cheryl:
Thank You, Dale (860) 267-3133 IloflI 12 I 1/1/2006 8:13 AM Data Review Qualifier Definitions 13 Data Review Qualifier Definitions Qualifier Explanation A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria** Analyte is a surrogate compound* Result is less than value reported* Result is greater than value reported RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <SX the RL A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank B Metals-Either presence of analyte detected in the associated blank, or MDL/IDL < sample value < PQL BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample d 5-day BOD-The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample E Organics-Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range E Metals-%difference of sample and SD is >10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria H Analytical holding time was exceeded h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N Metals-The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits N Organics-Presumptive evidence based on mass spectral library search to make a tentative identification of the analyte (TIC). Quantitation is based on nearest internal standard response factor N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more ND Analyte concentration is not detected above the reporting limit UI Gamma Spectroscopy-Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound Z Paint Filter Test-Particulates passed through the filter, however no free liquids were observed.GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.P.O. BOX 30712 Charleston, SC 29417 -2040 Savage Road (29407)Phone (843) 556-8171 -FaI(43) 766-1178 www.gel.com RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS 15 Radiochemistry Case Narrative Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co. (YANK)Work Order 175290 Method/Analysis Information Product: Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 584736 584677 584673 Sample ID 175290001 1201220181 1201220182 1201220183 1201220184 Client ID 9106-0007-014F Method Blank (MB)175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Per our earlier discussion, please analyze samples 9106-0007-014F and 9106-0007-021 F to the FSSALL protocol per MSR 06-1310, with a 7 day TAT. Each of these samples were previously tested for FSSGAM and Sr-90 under MSR 06-0730 and MSR 06-1035 respectively. Thank you for your assistance.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Thank You, Dale (860) 267-3133 IloflI                                                       12                                           I 1/1/2006 8:13 AM
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.Calibration Information:
 
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Data Review Qualifier Definitions 13
16 Quality Control (QC) Information:
 
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
Data Review Qualifier Definitions Qualifier       Explanation A quality control analyte recovery is         outside of specified acceptance criteria
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
** Analyte   is a surrogate compound
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Sample 1201220181 (MB) was recounted due to a negative result greater than three times the error.Miscellaneous Information:
* Result is   less than value reported
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
* Result is     greater than value reported RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations                       are <SX the RL A   The TIC is     a suspected aldol-condensation product B   Target   analyte was detected       in the associated blank B   Metals-Either presence of analyte detected in                 the associated blank,       or MDL/IDL < sample value < PQL BD   Results are either below the MDC or tracer               recovery is     low C   Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D   Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample d   5-day BOD-The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample E   Organics-Concentration of the target             analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range E   Metals-%difference     of sample and SD is       >10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria H   Analytical holding time was exceeded h   Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded J   Value is   estimated N   Metals-The Matrix spike sample recovery is               not within specified control limits N   Organics-Presumptive evidence based on mass spectral library search to make a tentative identification     of the analyte     (TIC). Quantitation is       based on nearest internal standard response   factor N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply.             Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more ND   Analyte concentration is   not detected above the reporting limit UI   Gamma Spectroscopy-Uncertain identification X     Consult Case Narrative,   Data Summary package,         or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y     QC Samples were not spiked with this compound Z     Paint Filter Test-Particulates passed through the filter,             however no free liquids were observed.
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information 17 Product: Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified Analytical Method: Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 584744 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 584675 Sample ID 175290002 1201220201 1201220202 1201220203 1201220204 Client ID 9106-0007-021F Method Blank (MB)175290002(9106-0007-021 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP)175290002(9106-0007-02 IF) Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.Calibration Information:
GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
P.O. BOX 30712 Charleston, SC 29417 - 2040 Savage Road (29407)
Phone (843) 556-8171 - FaI(43) 766-1178 www.gel.com
 
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS 15
 
Radiochemistry Case Narrative Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co. (YANK)
Work Order 175290 Method/Analysis Information Product:                                           Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                 DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           584736 Prep Batch Number:                                 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           584673 Sample ID     Client ID 175290001      9106-0007-014F 1201220181    Method Blank (MB) 1201220182      175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220183      175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220184    Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
16
 
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290002 (9106-0007-02 IF).QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.18 Technical Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Sample 1201220181 (MB) was recounted due to a negative result greater than three times the error.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-1 1-RC Modified Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 584737 584677 584673 19 Sample ID Client ID 175290001 9106-0007-014F 1201220185 Method Blank (MB)1201220186 175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)1201220187 175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Matrix Spike (MS)1201220188 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.Calibration Information:
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Method/Analysis Information 17
 
Product:                                           Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                 DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           584744 Prep Batch Number:                                 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           584675 Sample ID       Client ID 175290002      9106-0007-021F 1201220201      Method Blank (MB) 1201220202      175290002(9106-0007-021 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220203      175290002(9106-0007-02 IF) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220204      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290002 (9106-0007-02 IF).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
18
 
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this 20 SDG.Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS DOE EML HASL-300, Pu- 11-RC Modified Analytical Method: Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 584743 584677 584673 Sample ID 175290001 1201220197 1201220198 1201220199 1201220200 Client ID 9106-0007-014F Method Blank (MB)175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-035 REV# 8.Calibration Information:
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).21 Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Method/Analysis Information Product:                                           Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-1 1-RC Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           584737 Prep Batch Number:                                 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           584673 19
 
Sample ID       Client ID 175290001      9106-0007-014F 1201220185      Method Blank (MB) 1201220186      175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220187      175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220188      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples 1201220197 (MB), 1201220198 (9106-0007-014F), 1201220200 (LCS) and 175290001 (9106-0007-014F) were recounted due to quench being outside calibration.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this 20
The following NCR was generated for this SDG: NCR 380650 was generated due to Sample Analyzed out of Holding. 1. Sample 175290001 was analyzed out of holding. 1. Reporting results.Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information 22 Product: Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Pu- 11-RC Modified Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 584747 584677 584675 Sample ID 175290002 1201220218 1201220219 1201220220 1201220221 Client ID 9106-0007-021F Method Blank (MB)175290002(9106-0007-021 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP)175290002(9106-0007-021 F) Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 14.Calibration Information:
 
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
SDG.
Quality Control (Q0 Information:
Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290002 (9106-0007-021F).
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.23 Technical Information:
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Method/Analysis Information Product:                                            Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                  DOE EML HASL-300, Pu- 11-RC Modified Prep Method:                                        Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                  Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                            584743 Prep Batch Number:                                  584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:            584673 Sample ID      Client ID 175290001      9106-0007-014F 1201220197      Method Blank (MB) 1201220198      175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220199      175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220200      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-035 REV# 8.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
21
 
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples 1201220197 (MB), 1201220198 (9106-0007-014F), 1201220200 (LCS) and 175290001 (9106-0007-014F) were recounted due to quench being outside calibration.
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. The following NCR was generated for this SDG:
NCR 380650 was generated due to Sample Analyzed out of Holding. 1. Sample 175290001 was analyzed out of holding. 1. Reporting results.
Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/Analysis Information 22
 
Product:                                           Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu- 11-RC Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           584747 Prep Batch Number:                                 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           584675 Sample ID       Client ID 175290002        9106-0007-021F 1201220218      Method Blank (MB) 1201220219      175290002(9106-0007-021 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220220      175290002(9106-0007-021 F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220221      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 14.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (Q0     Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290002 (9106-0007-021F).
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
23
 
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-1i -RC Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 584751 Prep Batch Number: 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 584675 24 Sample ID Client ID 175290002 9106-0007-021F 1201220222 Method Blank (MB)1201220223 175290002(9106-0007-021 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1201220224 175290002(9106-0007-021F)
Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.
Matrix Spike (MS)1201220225 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-035 REV# 8.Calibration Information:
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/Analysis Information Product:                                           Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-1i -RC Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           584751 Prep Batch Number:                                 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           584675 24
 
Sample ID       Client ID 175290002       9106-0007-021F 1201220222     Method Blank (MB) 1201220223     175290002(9106-0007-021 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220224       175290002(9106-0007-021F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220225       Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-035 REV# 8.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290002 (9106-0007-021F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290002 (9106-0007-021F).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples were recounted due to quench number being outside calibration range.Miscellaneous Information:
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
Technical Information:
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this 25 SDG.Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analytical Batch Number: 584644 Sample ID 175290002 1201219905 1201219906 1201219907 1201219908 Client ID 9106-0007-021F Method Blank (MB)175288015(9512-00-003F)
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)175288015(9512-00-003F)
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-005 REV# 13.Calibration Information:
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples were recounted due to quench number being outside calibration range.
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this 25
 
SDG.
Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/Analysis Information Product:                       Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:             DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analytical Batch Number:       584644 Sample ID       Client ID 175290002      9106-0007-021F 1201219905      Method Blank (MB) 1201219906      175288015(9512-00-003F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201219907      175288015(9512-00-003F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201219908      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-005 REV# 13.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QCQ Information:
Quality Control (QCQ Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.26 Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288015 (9512-00-003F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
26
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
 
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288015 (9512-00-003F).
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Oualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: Analytical Batch Number: Sample ID 175290001 1201220020 1201220021 1201220022 1201220023 DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified 584692 Client ID 9106-0007-014F Method Blank (MB)175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Oualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)27 SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-005 REV# 13.Calibration Information:
Method/Analysis Information Product:                     Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:           DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analytical Batch Number:      584692 Sample ID      Client ID 175290001      9106-0007-014F 1201220020      Method Blank (MB) 1201220021      175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220022      175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220023      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 27
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
 
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-005 REV# 13.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. The following NCR was generated for this SDG:
The following NCR was generated for this SDG: NCR 380217 was generated due to Sample Analyzed out of Holding. 1. Sample 175290001 is a relog of 163626014 causing the sample to be analyzed out of holding. 1. Reporting results.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.28 Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Fe-1, Modified Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-02 1 Batch Number: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 584650 584677 584675 Sample ID 175290002 1201219928 1201219929 1201219930 1201219931 Client ID 9106-0007-021F Method Blank (MB)175288015(9512-00-003F)
NCR 380217 was generated due to Sample Analyzed out of Holding. 1. Sample 175290001 is a relog of 163626014 causing the sample to be analyzed out of holding. 1. Reporting results.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)175288015(9512-00-003F)
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-040 REV# 3.Calibration Information:
28
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
 
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/Analysis Information Product:                                           Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                 DOE RESL Fe-1, Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           584650 Prep Batch Number:                                 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-02 1 Batch Number:           584675 Sample ID       Client ID 175290002      9106-0007-021F 1201219928      Method Blank (MB) 1201219929      175288015(9512-00-003F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201219930      175288015(9512-00-003F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201219931      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-040 REV# 3.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Ouality Control (OC) Information:
Ouality Control (OC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.29 Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288015 (9512-00-003F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
29
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
 
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288015 (9512-00-003F).
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Fe-1, Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 584687 Prep Batch Number: 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 584673 30 Sample ID Client ID 175290001 9106-0007-014F 1201220008 Method Blank (MB)1201220009 175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)1201220010 175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Matrix Spike (MS)1201220011 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-040 REV# 3.Calibration Information:
Method/Analysis Information Product:                                           Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                 DOE RESL Fe-1, Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           584687 Prep Batch Number:                                 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           584673 30
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
 
Sample ID       Client ID 175290001       9106-0007-014F 1201220008     Method Blank (MB) 1201220009     175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220010     175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220011     Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-040 REV# 3.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this 31
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this 31 SDG.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Ni-1, Modified Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 584649 584677 584675 Sample ID 175290002 1201219924 1201219925 1201219926 1201219927 Client ID 9106-0007-021F Method Blank (MB)175288015(9512-00-003F)
 
Sample Duplicate (DUP)175288015(9512-00-003F)
SDG.
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-022 REV# 8.Calibration Information:
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
32 Quality Control (QC) Information:
Method/Analysis Information Product:                                           Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                 DOE RESL Ni-1, Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           584649 Prep Batch Number:                                 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           584675 Sample ID       Client ID 175290002      9106-0007-021F 1201219924      Method Blank (MB) 1201219925      175288015(9512-00-003F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201219926      175288015(9512-00-003F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201219927      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288015 (9512-00-003F).
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-022 REV# 8.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
Calibration Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
32
 
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288015 (9512-00-003F).
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Ni-1, Modified Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Analytical Batch Number: Prep Batch Number: Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep 584690 584677 584673 33 Sample ID Client ID 175290001 9106-0007-014F 1201220016 Method Blank (MB)1201220017 175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)1201220018 175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Matrix Spike (MS)1201220019 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-022 REV# 8.Calibration Information:
Method/Analysis Information Product:                                           Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method:                                 DOE RESL Ni-1, Modified Prep Method:                                       Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:                 Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:                           584690 Prep Batch Number:                                 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:           584673 33
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
 
Sample ID       Client ID 175290001       9106-0007-014F 1201220016     Method Blank (MB) 1201220017     175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220018     175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220019     Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-022 REV# 8.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples were recounted due to low/high recovery.Miscellaneous Information:
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
NCR Documentation 34 Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
Technical Information:
The following NCR was generated for this SDG: NCR 380283 was generated due to Sample Analyzed out of Holding. 1. Sample 17529001 was a relog of 163626014 causing the recount of the sample to be out of holding. 1. Reporting results Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Analytical Method: Analytical Batch Number: Sample ID 175290001 1201220024 1201220025 1201220026 1201220027 LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid-HTD2,ALL FSS EPA 906.0 Modified 584693 Client ID 9106-0007-014F Method Blank (MB)175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-002 REV# 13.Calibration Information:
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples were recounted due to low/high recovery.
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation 34
 
Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. The following NCR was generated for this SDG:
NCR 380283 was generated due to Sample Analyzed out of Holding. 1. Sample 17529001 was a relog of 163626014 causing the recount of the sample to be out of holding. 1. Reporting results Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/Analysis Information Product:                       LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid-HTD2,ALL FSS Analytical Method:              EPA 906.0 Modified Analytical Batch Number:        584693 Sample ID        Client ID 175290001      9106-0007-014F 1201220024    Method Blank (MB) 1201220025      175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220026      175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220027      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-002 REV# 13.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Ouality Control (0C) Information:
Ouality Control (0C) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.35 Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
35
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
 
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Miscellaneous Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. The following NCR was generated for this SDG:
The following NCR was generated for this SDG: NCR 379311 was generated due to Container scanning event for custody missed. 1. The analyst did not scan the sample 175290 001 into the batch prior to analysis, however the samples did remain in their custody at all times. 1. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the proper scanning procedures.
NCR 379311 was generated due to Container scanning event for custody missed. 1. The analyst did not scan the sample 175290 001 into the batch prior to analysis, however the samples did remain in their custody at all times. 1. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the proper scanning procedures.
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid-HTD2,ALL FSS Analytical Method: EPA 906.0 Modified Analytical Batch Number: 585989 36 Sample ID Client ID 175290002 9106-0007-021F 1201223381 Method Blank (MB)1201223382 175288015(9512-00-003F)
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)1201223383 175288015(9512-00-003F)
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Matrix Spike (MS)1201223384 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-002 REV# 13.Calibration Information:
Method/Analysis Information Product:                       LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid-HTD2,ALL FSS Analytical Method:             EPA 906.0 Modified Analytical Batch Number:       585989 36
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
 
Sample ID       Client ID 175290002       9106-0007-021F 1201223381     Method Blank (MB) 1201223382     175288015(9512-00-003F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201223383     175288015(9512-00-003F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201223384     Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-002 REV# 13.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QCQ Information:
Quality Control (QCQ Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288015 (9512-00-003F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288015 (9512-00-003F).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples 1201223381 (MB) and 175290002 (9106-0007-021F) were reprepped due to high relative percent difference/relative error ratio.Miscellaneous Information:
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from 37 referenced SOP or contractual documents.
Technical Information:
The following NCR was generated for this SDG: NCR 380628 was generated due to Container scanning event for custody missed. 1. The analyst did not scan the samples 175288 015,018, 175290 002 into the batch prior to analysis, however the samples did remain in their custody at all times. 1. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the proper scanning procedures.
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint C14, Solid AII,FSS EPA EERF C-01 Modified Analytical Method: Analytical Batch Number: 584648 Sample ID 175290002 1201219920 1201219921 1201219922 1201219923 Client ID 9106-0007-021F Method Blank (MB)175288018(9512-00-007F)
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)175288018(9512-00-007F)
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples 1201223381 (MB) and 175290002 (9106-0007-021F) were reprepped due to high relative percent difference/relative error ratio.
Matrix Spike (MS)Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-003 REV# 8.Calibration Information:
Miscellaneous Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from 37
 
referenced SOP or contractual documents. The following NCR was generated for this SDG:
NCR 380628 was generated due to Container scanning event for custody missed. 1. The analyst did not scan the samples 175288 015,018, 175290 002 into the batch prior to analysis, however the samples did remain in their custody at all times. 1. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the proper scanning procedures.
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/Analysis Information Product:                       Liquid Scint C14, Solid AII,FSS Analytical Method:              EPA EERF C-01 Modified Analytical Batch Number:       584648 Sample ID       Client ID 175290002      9106-0007-021F 1201219920      Method Blank (MB) 1201219921      175288018(9512-00-007F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201219922      175288018(9512-00-007F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201219923      Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-003 REV# 8.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information 38 The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288018 (9512-00-007F).
Blank Information 38
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
 
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Sample 1201219920 (MB) was recounted due to the quench number being outside the calibration range. Samples 1201219922 (9512-00-007F) and 1201219923 (LCS) were recounted due to analyst error.Miscellaneous Information:
The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288018 (9512-00-007F).
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint C14, Solid AII,FSS Analytical Method: EPA EERF C-01 Modified Analytical Batch Number: 584694 39 Sample ID Client ID 175290001 9106-0007-014F 1201220028 Method Blank (MB)1201220029 175290001(9106-0007-014F)
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Sample Duplicate (DUP)1201220030 175290001(9106-0007-014F)
Technical Information:
Matrix Spike (MS)1201220031 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-003 REV# 8.Calibration Information:
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Sample 1201219920 (MB) was recounted due to the quench number being outside the calibration range. Samples 1201219922 (9512-00-007F) and 1201219923 (LCS) were recounted due to analyst error.
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Method/Analysis Information Product:                     Liquid Scint C14, Solid AII,FSS Analytical Method:           EPA EERF C-01 Modified Analytical Batch Number:     584694 39
 
Sample ID       Client ID 175290001       9106-0007-014F 1201220028     Method Blank (MB) 1201220029     175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220030     175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220031     Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-003 REV# 8.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information:
Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Miscellaneous Information:
QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents.
Technical Information:
A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.Additional Comments 40 Additional comments were not required for this sample set.Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.
Miscellaneous Information:
NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments 40
 
Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.
Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Review Validation:
Review Validation:
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator.
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.
In addition, all data designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:
11/ V 1, KAOO&O- -6 Reviewer/Date:
11/V 1,
41 General Engineering Laboratories Form GEL-NCR Rev. 06/05 NCR Report No.: 379311 Revision No.: COMPANY -WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr. Division:
Reviewer/Date:                    KAOO&O- -6 41
Quality Criteria:
 
Type: 03-NOV-06 Radiochemistry Specifications Process Instrument Type: Test I Method: Matrix Type: Client Code: LSC EPA 906.0 Modified Solid YANK Batch ID: Sample Numbers: 584693 See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG):
General Engineering Laboratories                                                                                         NCR Report No.:     379311 Form GEL-NCR                                                                                                                Revision No.:
175290(MSR#06-1310)
Rev. 06/05 COMPANY       -WIDE       NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr.                             Division:                             Quality Criteria:                     Type:
Application Issues: Container scanning event for custody missed Specification and Requirements NRG Disposition:
03-NOV-06                             Radiochemistry                         Specifications                         Process Instrument Type:                       Test I Method:                         Matrix Type:                           Client Code:
Nonconformance  
LSC                                   EPA 906.0 Modified                     Solid                                 YANK Batch ID:                             Sample Numbers:
584693                                 See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG): 175290(MSR#06-1310)
Application Issues:
Container scanning event for custody missed Specification and Requirements                                               NRG Disposition:
Nonconformance
 
== Description:==
: 1. The analyst did not scan the sample 175290 001 into the batch prior to    1. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the analysis, however the samples did remain in their custody at all times,      proper scanning procedures.
Originator's Name:                                                            Data Validator/Group Leader:
Amy Scott              03-NOV-06                                            Heather Anderson        08-NOV-06 Quality Review:
Director:
Page 1 42
 
General Engineering Laboratories                                                                              NCR Report No.:  380217 Form GEL-NCR Revision No.: I Rev. 06/05 COMPANY - WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr.                            Division:                          Quality Criteria:              Type:
07-NOV-06                            Radiochemistry                      Specifications                  Process Instrument Type:                      Test / Method:                      Matrix Type:                    Client Code:
LSC                                  DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC          Solid                          YANK
                                    -Modified Batch ID:                            Sample Numbers:
584692                                See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG): 175290(MSR#06-1310)
Application Issues:
Sample Analyzed out of Holding Specification and Requirements                                          NRG Disposition:
Nonconformance


==
== Description:==
Description:==
: 1. Sample 175290001 is a relog of 163626014 causing the sample to be    1. Reporting results.
: 1. The analyst did not scan the sample 175290 001 into the batch prior to 1. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the analysis, however the samples did remain in their custody at all times, proper scanning procedures.
analyzed out of holding.
Originator's Name: Amy Scott Quality Review: Data Validator/Group Leader: Heather Anderson 08-NOV-06 03-NOV-06 Director: Page 1 42 General Engineering Laboratories Form GEL-NCR Rev. 06/05 NCR Report No.: 380217 Revision No.: I COMPANY -WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr. Division:
Originator's Name:                                                       Data Validator/Group Leader:
Quality Criteria:
Amy Scott                07-NOV-06                                       Heather Anderson      08-NOV-06 Quality Review:
Type: 07-NOV-06 Radiochemistry Specifications Process Instrument Type: Test / Method: Matrix Type: Client Code: LSC DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Solid YANK-Modified Batch ID: Sample Numbers: 584692 See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG):
Director:
175290(MSR#06-1310)
Page 1 43
Application Issues: Sample Analyzed out of Holding Specification and Requirements NRG Disposition:
Nonconformance


==
General Engineering Laboratories                                                                               NCR Report No.:   380283 Form GEL-NCR                                                                                                      Revision No.:
Description:==
Rev. 06/05 COMPANY - WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Typie:tCoe Mo.Day Yr.                           Division:     :Mtiy:                 Quality Criteria:               Type:
: 1. Sample 175290001 is a relog of 163626014 causing the sample to be 1. Reporting results.analyzed out of holding.Originator's Name: Amy Scott Quality Review: Data Validator/Group Leader: Heather Anderson 08-NOV-06 07-NOV-06 Director: Page 1 43 General Engineering Laboratories Form GEL-NCR Rev. 06/05 NCR Report No.: 380283 Revision No.: COMPANY -WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr.07-NOV-06 DivimetTye:T stIMton :Mtiy: Typie:tCoe Division: Radiochemistry Quality Criteria: Specifications Type: Process Instrument Type: Test / Method: Matrix Type: Client Code: LSC DOE RESL Ni-i, Modified Solid YANK Batch ID: Sample Numbers: 584690 See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG):
stIMton DivimetTye:T 07-NOV-06                            Radiochemistry                        Specifications                  Process Instrument Type:                     Test / Method:                       Matrix Type:                   Client Code:
175290(MSR#06-1310)
LSC                                 DOE RESL Ni-i, Modified             Solid                           YANK Batch ID:                           Sample Numbers:
Application Issues: Sample Analyzed out of Holding Specification and Requirements INRG Disposition:
584690                               See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG): 175290(MSR#06-1310)
Nonconformance  
Application Issues:
Sample Analyzed out of Holding Specification and Requirements                                         INRG Disposition:
Nonconformance


==
== Description:==
Description:==
I
I
: 1. Sample 17529001 was a relog of 163626014 causing the recount of 1. Reporting results the sample to be out of holding.Originator's Name: Kenshalla Oston Quality Review: Data Validator/Group Leader: Heather Anderson 08-NOV-06 07-NOV-06 Director: Page 1 44 General Engineering Laboratories Form GEL-NCR Rev. 06/05 NCR Report No.: 380628 Revision No.: 1 COMPANY -WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr. Division:
: 1. Sample 17529001 was a relog of 163626014 causing the recount of       1. Reporting results the sample to be out of holding.
Quality Criteria:
Originator's Name:                                                       Data Validator/Group Leader:
Type: 08-NOV-06 Radiochemistry Specifications Process Instrument Type: Test / Method: Matrix Type: Client Code: LSC EPA 906.0 Modified Solid YANK Batch ID: Sample Numbers: 585989 See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG):
Kenshalla Oston        07-NOV-06                                         Heather Anderson      08-NOV-06 Quality Review:
175288(MSR#06-1425),175290(MSR#06-131 0)Application Issues: Container scanning event for custody missed Specification and Requirements NRG Disposition:
Director:
Nonconformance
Page 1 44


==
General Engineering Laboratories                                                                                           NCR Report No.:     380628 Form GEL-NCR Revision No.:   1 Rev. 06/05 COMPANY - WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr.                               Division:                             Quality Criteria:                     Type:
Description:==
08-NOV-06                               Radiochemistry                         Specifications                         Process Instrument Type:                       Test / Method:                         Matrix Type:                           Client Code:
: 1. The analyst did not scan the samples 175288 015,018, 175290 002 1. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the into the batch prior to analysis, however the samples did remain in their proper scanning procedures.
LSC                                     EPA 906.0 Modified                    Solid                                 YANK Batch ID:                               Sample Numbers:
custody at all times.Originator's Name: Amy Scott Quality Review: Data Validator/Group Leader: Heather Anderson 08-NOV-06 08-NOV-06 Director: Page 1 45 General Engineering Laboratories Form GEL-NCR Rev. 06/05 NCR Report No.: 380650 Revision No.: 1 COMPANY -WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr. Division:
585989                                  See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG): 175288(MSR#06-1425),175290(MSR#06-131 0)
Quality Criteria:
Application Issues:
Type: 08-NOV-06 Radiochemistry Specifications Process Instrument Type: Test / Method: Matrix Type: Client Code: LSC DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-11-RC Solid YANK---Modified Batch ID: Sample Numbers: 584743 See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG):
Container scanning event for custody missed Specification and Requirements                                                 NRG Disposition:
175290(MSR#06-1310)
Nonconformance
Application Issues: Sample Analyzed out of Holding Specification and Requirements NRG Disposition:
Nonconformance  


==
== Description:==
Description:==
: 1. The analyst did not scan the samples 175288 015,018, 175290 002            1. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the into the batch prior to analysis, however the samples did remain in their      proper scanning procedures.
: 1. Sample 175290001 was analyzed out of holding. 1. Reporting results.Originator's Name: Amy Scott Quality Review: Data Validator/Group Leader: Heather Anderson 08-NOV-06 08-NOV-06 Director: Page 1 46 SAMPLE DATA  
custody at all times.
Originator's Name:                                                            Data Validator/Group Leader:
Amy Scott                  08-NOV-06                                            Heather Anderson          08-NOV-06 Quality Review:
Director:
Page 1 45
 
General Engineering Laboratories                                                                            NCR Report No.:  380650 Form GEL-NCR Rev. 06/05                                                                                                      Revision No.: 1 COMPANY - WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr.                            Division:                        Quality Criteria:              Type:
08-NOV-06                              Radiochemistry                  Specifications                  Process Instrument Type:                      Test / Method:                  Matrix Type:                    Client Code:
LSC                                    DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-11-RC      Solid                          YANK
                            -      -- Modified Batch ID:                              Sample Numbers:
584743                                See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG): 175290(MSR#06-1310)
Application Issues:
Sample Analyzed out of Holding Specification and Requirements                                        NRG Disposition:
Nonconformance
 
== Description:==
: 1. Sample 175290001 was analyzed out of holding.                       1. Reporting results.
Originator's Name:                                                     Data Validator/Group Leader:
Amy Scott              08-NOV-06                                       Heather Anderson      08-NOV-06 Quality Review:
Director:
Page 1 46
 
SAMPLE DATA


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
47 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report for YANKOO Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.Client SDG: MSR#06-1310 GEL Work Order: 175290 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified
 
47
 
GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report for YANKOO        Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.
Client SDG: MSR#06-1310 GEL Work Order: 175290 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
**  Analyte is a surrogate compound H    Analytical holding time was exceeded U    Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.
ND    The


== Description:==
== Description:==
Comparison of split samples collected from sample measurement location #04 and analyzec using gamma spectroscopy by an off-site vendor laboratory. The standard sample was 9106-0007-004F the comparison sample was 9106-0007-004FS.
STANDARD                                                        COMPARISON Radionuclide    Activity    Standard    Resolution    Agreement      Activity  Standard Comparison Acceptable (Y/N)
Value        Error                      Range        Value      Error    Ratio Cs-137      9.66E-03    1.32E-02          1      NONE-            5.74E-03 9.60E-03        0.59          N/A Co-60      3.42E-02      1.50E-02          2      NONE-            6.27E-02    1.18E-02    1.83          N/A Sr-90      -6.42E-03    7.70E-03        -1      NONE-            5.85E-03  8.95E-03    -0.91          N/A K-40      1.41E+01      5.60E-01        25        0.75  1.33    1.13E+01  3.75E-01      0.80            Y Comments/Corrective Actions: In consideration of Cs-137, Co- Table is provided to show acceptance criteria used 60 & Sr-90 results, guidance for agreement ranges, obtained            to assess split samples.
from USNRC Inspection Procedure 84750, does not address resolution ratios less than 4, therefore, a determination of                Resolution            Agreement Range acceptability for such ratios is not appropriate. Since K-40 was            4          7      0.50          2.00 found to be present at an acceptable level of agreement, no                8          15      0.60          1.66 further action is warranted.                                                16        50      0.75          1.33 51        200      0.80          1.25
                                                                                > 200          0.85          1.18 viewed By:                    Date:
WPIR - Work Plan and Inspection Record SML - Sample Measurement Location designation Page    I of I


Comparison of split samples collected from sample measurement location #04 and analyzec using gamma spectroscopy by an off-site vendor laboratory.
Connecticut Yankee Decommissioning Project Health                             24265-000-GPR-GGGR-R5124-000 Attachment A Physics Procedure Split Sample Assessment Form Survey         9106         Survey       0007 Survey Unit Discharge Canal Area#:                     Unit #:               Name:
The standard sample was 9106-0007-004F the comparison sample was 9106-0007-004FS.
Sample Plan or WPIR#: 2006-0021                                                       SML #: 9106-0007-013 Sample
STANDARD COMPARISON Radionuclide Activity Standard Resolution Agreement Activity Standard Comparison Acceptable (Y/N)Value Error Range Value Error Ratio Cs-137 9.66E-03 1.32E-02 1 NONE- 5.74E-03 9.60E-03 0.59 N/A Co-60 3.42E-02 1.50E-02 2 NONE- 6.27E-02 1.18E-02 1.83 N/A Sr-90 -6.42E-03 7.70E-03 -1 NONE- 5.85E-03 8.95E-03 -0.91 N/A K-40 1.41E+01 5.60E-01 25 0.75 1.33 1.13E+01 3.75E-01 0.80 Y Comments/Corrective Actions: In consideration of Cs-137, Co-60 & Sr-90 results, guidance for agreement ranges, obtained from USNRC Inspection Procedure 84750, does not address resolution ratios less than 4, therefore, a determination of acceptability for such ratios is not appropriate.
Since K-40 was found to be present at an acceptable level of agreement, no further action is warranted.
Table is provided to show acceptance criteria used to assess split samples.Resolution Agreement Range 4 7 0.50 2.00 8 15 0.60 1.66 16 50 0.75 1.33 51 200 0.80 1.25> 200 0.85 1.18 viewed By: Date: WPIR -Work Plan and Inspection Record SML -Sample Measurement Location designation Page I of I Connecticut Yankee Decommissioning Project Health Physics Procedure 24265-000-GPR-GGGR-R5124-000 Attachment A Split Sample Assessment Form Survey 9106 Survey 0007 Survey Unit Discharge Canal Area#: Unit #: Name: Sample Plan or WPIR#: 2006-0021 SML #: 9106-0007-013 Sample


== Description:==
== Description:==
Comparison of split samples collected from sample measurement location #13 and analyzed using gamma spectroscopy by an off-site vendor laboratory. The standard sample was 9106-0007-013F, the comparison sample was 9106-0007-0133FS.
STANDARD                                                        COMPARISON Radionuclide    Activity    Standard    Resolution    Agreement      Activity    Standard Comparison Acceptable (Y/N)
Value        Error                      Range        Value      Error    Ratio Cs-137        2.21E-02    1.25E-02        2        N/A            2.01E-02    1.18E-02    0.91          N/A Co-60        1.86E-02    1.11E-02        2        N/A            1.27E-02 1.14E-02      0.68          N/A Sr-90      -9.81E-03    5.75E-03        -2        N/A            2.91E-03 5.10E-03      -0.30          N/A K-40        1.94E+01    4.29E-01        45        0.75    1.33  2.06E+01 7.40E-01        1.06            Y Comments/Corrective Actions: In consideration of Cs-137, Co- Table is provided to show acceptance criteria used 60 & Sr-90 results, guidance for agreement ranges, obtained            to assess split samples.
from USNRC Inspection Procedure 84750, does not address resolution ratios less than 4, therefore, a determination of                Resolution            Agreement Range acceptability for such ratios is not appropriate. Since K-40 was            4          7      0.50          2.00 found to be present at an acceptable level of agreement, no                8          15      0.60          1.66 further action is warranted.                                              16          50      0.75          1.33 51        200      0.80          1.25
                                                                                > 200          0.85          1.18 Performed By:                                    Date:                Reviewed B                        Date:
WPIR - Work Plan and Inspection Record SML - Sample Measurement Location designation Page    I of I
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2c Prel imi nary Data Forms (1 Page)
Health Physics Procedure                              GPP-GGGR-R512 1-001 Attachment B, Rev. CY-00 I MAJOR Health Physics Procedure                              GPP-GGGR-R5 121-001 Attachment B, Rev. CY-0O I MAJOR Preliminary Data Review Form - Samples for the Sign Test Survey Unit:        9106- 0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Classification:      2 Survey Media:      Soil Type of Survey:    Final Status Survey Type of Measurement:      Radionuclide Specific Number of Measurements:          15 Operational DCGL:          1 BASIC STATISTICAL QUANTITIES Cs-137          Co-60        Sr-90 Minimum Value: -1.62E-02          -1.89E-02    -9.81E-03 Maximum Value: 5.38E-01            1.10E+00      4.04E-02 Mean: 2.13E-01          2.17E-01      7.51E-03 Median: 1.98E-01          4.96E-02      5.58E-03 Standard Deviation: 1.96E-01          3.06E-0I      1.23E-02 RADIONUCLIDE CONCENTRATION (pCi/g)
NUMBER                Cs-137          Co-60        Sr-90  Identified?  Identified?  Identified?
9106-0007-001 F          3.20E-02      4.96E-02      5.58E-03      Y            Y            N 9106-0007-002F          4.41 E-01      2.79E-02      3.43E-03      Y            N            N 9106-0007-003 F          1.98E-01      -1.89E-02      1.12E-02      Y            N            N 9106-0007-004F          9.66E-03      3.42E-02    -6.42E-03      N            Y            N 9106-0007-005 F          5.38E-01      1.90E-01      4.04E-02      Y            Y            Y 9106-0007-007F          2.51 E-01    4.31 E-01      4.74E-03      Y            Y            N 9106-0007-01 IF          2.26E-01      3.14E-01      8.57E-03      Y            Y            N 9106-0007-012F          -1.62E-02      -1.46E-02      8.97E-03      N            N            N 9106-0007-013F          2.21 E-02      1.86E-02    -9.81 E-03    N            N            N 9106-0007-014F          3.94E-01      1.10 E+00      3.92E-03      Y            Y            N 9106-0007-015F          2.32E-02      1.35E-02      7.39E-03      N            N            N 9106-0007-018F          1.620E-02    8.1 OOE-03    1.760E-02    N            N            N 9106-0007-019F          1.82E-01      3.96E-01      -2.18E-03      Y            Y            N 91 06-0007-020F        4.82E-01        1.65E-01    2.15E-02      Y            Y            Y 9106-0007-021 F          3.94E-01      5.43E-01      -2.21 E-03    Y            Y            N Performed By:      (%~(                                          Date:  10-31-04 Independent Review:                                                    Date:
1000o,                                              4&#xfd;L-
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2d Graphical Representation of Data (6 Pages)
Health Physics Procedure                                  GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Quantile Plot For Cesium - 137 Survey Unit:        9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean:            2.29E-01 pCi/g Cs-1 37          Rank    Percentage
                              -1.62E-02            1        3 %
9.66E-03            2        10 %
1.62E-02            3      17 %
2.21 E-02          4        23 %
2.32E-02            5      30 %
3.20E-02            6        37 %
1.82E-01            7      43 %
1.98E-01            8        50 %
2.26E-01            9        57 %
2.51E-01            10      63 %
3.94E-01            11      70 %
3.94E-01            12      77 %
4.41 E-01          13      83 %
4.82E-01            14      90 %
5.38E-01            15      97 %
Prepared By:      62/ 2~Z~                              Date:__________
Reviewed By:                                            Date:
                                                                            /  ',
Health Physics Procedure                              GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Quantile Plot For Cobalt - 60 Survey Unit:        9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean:          2.45E-01 pCi/g Co-60          Rank      Percentage
                              -1.89E-02            1          3 %
                              -1.46E-02          2        10 %
8.10E-03            3        17 %
1.35E-02          4        23 %
1.86E-02          5        30 %
2.79E-02          6        37 %
3.42E-02          7        43 %
4.96E-02          8        50 %
1.65E-01          9        57 %
1.90E-01          10        63 %
3.14E-01          11        70 %
3.96E-01          12        77 %
4.31 E-01          13        83 %
5.43E-01          14        90 %
1.1OE+00            15        97 %
Prepared By:    e&#xfd;)4,z                                        Date: - '/
* Reviewed By:                                                  Date:
Health Physics Procedure                          GGGR-R5123 -Rev. CY-00 I Attachment C Quantile Plot For Strontium - 90 Survey Unit: 9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean: 6.65E-03 pCi/g 5.OOE-02 4.OOE-02 3.OOE-02 r0    2.OOE-02
      . 1.OOE-02                      _
        " 0.OOE+00 0
O                            20          40            60            80          10
          -1.OOE-02
          -2.PeE-02 Percentage Sr-90    Rank        Percentage
                                -9.81 E-03  1              3 %
                                -6.42E-03    2            10 %
                                -2.21E-03    3            17 %
                                -2.18E-03    4            23 %
3.43E-03    5            30 %
3.92E-03    6            37 %
4.74E-03    7            43 %
5.58E-03    8            50 %
7.39E-03    9            57 %
8.57E-03    10          63 %
8.97E-03    11          70 %
1.12E-02    12          77 %
1.76E-02    13          83 %
2.15E-02    14          90 %
4.04E-02    15          97 %
Prepared By:                                              Date:  1'-3. {-0d Reviewed By:                                              Date:
Health Physics Procedure                                  GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Frequency Plot For Cs - 137 Survey Unit:        9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean:          0.229 pCi/g 6
5-W  4-0  3-Cr U.
2-1-
0-0.00        0.10        0.20        0.30        0.40  0.50      0.60 Upper End Value (pCilg)
Upper End    Observation Observation %
Value      Frequency  Frequency 0.00            1          7%
0.10            5          33%
0.20            2          13%
0.30            2          13%
0.40            2          13%
0.50            2          13%
0.60            1          7%
Total          15        100%
Prepared By:                                                    Date: -16P- 5Y - Ot Reviewed By:-Date:                                              Date:    A54    ,e/leey,
Health Physics Procedure                                GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Frequency Plot For Co - 60 Survey Unit:        9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean:        0.245 pCi/g Upper End  Observation Observation %
Value      Frequency  Frequency 0.00          2          13%
0.25          8          53%
0.50          3          20%
0.75            1          7%
1.00          0          0%
1.25            1          7%
Total          15        100%
Prepared By:      5ej        x "- " Zo-//                    Date:    t" 40- R *-?!
                  ~2~Q Reviewed By: Reviewed By:                                      Date:    /
Date:-/04//e79-  ~  ~
ell  /
Health Physics Procedure                              GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Frequency Plot For Sr - 90 Survey Unit:      9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean:    0.008 pCi/g 8-
          .4 -
3m.m.
0*
0.00        0.01        0.02        0.03        0.04    0.05 Upper End Value (pCi/g)
Upper End  Observation Observation %
Value    Frequency  Frequency 0.00          4          27%
0.01          7          47%
0.02          2          13%
0.03          1          7%
0.04          0          0%
0.05          1          7%
Total        15        100%
Prepared By:                                                Date: 10-31-0 2~W~4t~
Reviewed By:                                                  Date: /  5/  '


Comparison of split samples collected from sample measurement location #13 and analyzed using gamma spectroscopy by an off-site vendor laboratory.
The standard sample was 9106-0007-013F, the comparison sample was 9106-0007-0133FS.
STANDARD COMPARISON Radionuclide Activity Standard Resolution Agreement Activity Standard Comparison Acceptable (Y/N)Value Error Range Value Error Ratio Cs-137 2.21E-02 1.25E-02 2 N/A 2.01E-02 1.18E-02 0.91 N/A Co-60 1.86E-02 1.11E-02 2 N/A 1.27E-02 1.14E-02 0.68 N/A Sr-90 -9.81E-03 5.75E-03 -2 N/A 2.91E-03 5.10E-03 -0.30 N/A K-40 1.94E+01 4.29E-01 45 0.75 1.33 2.06E+01 7.40E-01 1.06 Y Comments/Corrective Actions: In consideration of Cs-137, Co- Table is provided to show acceptance criteria used 60 & Sr-90 results, guidance for agreement ranges, obtained to assess split samples.from USNRC Inspection Procedure 84750, does not address resolution ratios less than 4, therefore, a determination of Resolution Agreement Range acceptability for such ratios is not appropriate.
Since K-40 was 4 7 0.50 2.00 found to be present at an acceptable level of agreement, no 8 15 0.60 1.66 further action is warranted.
16 50 0.75 1.33 51 200 0.80 1.25> 200 0.85 1.18 Performed By: Date: Reviewed B Date: WPIR -Work Plan and Inspection Record SML -Sample Measurement Location designation Page I of I DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2c Prel i mi nary Data Forms (1 Page)
Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R512 1 -001 Attachment B, Rev. CY-00 I MAJOR Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5 121-001 Attachment B, Rev. CY-0O I MAJOR Preliminary Data Review Form -Samples for the Sign Test Survey Unit: 9106- 0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Classification:
Survey Media: Type of Survey: Type of Measurement:
Number of Measurements:
Operational DCGL: 2 Soil Final Status Survey Radionuclide Specific 15 1 BASIC STATISTICAL QUANTITIES Cs-137 Co-60 Sr-90 Minimum Value: -1.62E-02
-1.89E-02
-9.81E-03 Maximum Value: 5.38E-01 1.10E+00 4.04E-02 Mean: 2.13E-01 2.17E-01 7.51E-03 Median: 1.98E-01 4.96E-02 5.58E-03 Standard Deviation:
1.96E-01 3.06E-0I 1.23E-02 RADIONUCLIDE CONCENTRATION (pCi/g)NUMBER 9106-0007-001 F 9106-0007-002F 9106-0007-003 F 9106-0007-004F 9106-0007-005 F 9106-0007-007F 9106-0007-01 IF 9106-0007-012F 9106-0007-013F 9106-0007-014F 9106-0007-015F 9106-0007-018F 9106-0007-019F 91 06-0007-020F 9106-0007-021 F Cs-137 3.20E-02 4.41 E-01 1.98E-01 9.66E-03 5.38E-01 2.51 E-01 2.26E-01-1.62E-02 2.21 E-02 3.94E-01 2.32E-02 1.620E-02 1.82E-01 4.82E-01 3.94E-01 Co-60 4.96E-02 2.79E-02-1.89E-02 3.42E-02 1.90E-01 4.31 E-01 3.14E-01-1.46E-02 1.86E-02 1.10 E+00 1.35E-02 8.1 OOE-03 3.96E-01 1.65E-01 5.43E-01 Sr-90 5.58E-03 3.43E-03 1.12E-02-6.42E-03 4.04E-02 4.74E-03 8.57E-03 8.97E-03-9.81 E-03 3.92E-03 7.39E-03 1.760E-02-2.18E-03 2.15E-02-2.21 E-03 Identified?
Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N Y N N Y Y Y Identified?
Y N N Y Y Y Y N N Y N N Y Y Y Identified?
N N N N Y N N N N N N N N Y N (%~(Performed By: Date: 10-31-04 Independent Review: 1000o, Date: 4&#xfd;L-DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2d Graphical Representation of Data (6 Pages)
Health Physics Procedure GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Quantile Plot For Cesium -137 Survey Unit: 9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean: 2.29E-01 pCi/g Cs-1 37 Rank Percentage
-1.62E-02 1 3 %9.66E-03 2 10 %1.62E-02 3 17 %2.21 E-02 4 23 %2.32E-02 5 30 %3.20E-02 6 37 %1.82E-01 7 43 %1.98E-01 8 50 %2.26E-01 9 57 %2.51E-01 10 63 %3.94E-01 11 70 %3.94E-01 12 77 %4.41 E-01 13 83 %4.82E-01 14 90 %5.38E-01 15 97 %62/ 2~Z~Prepared By: Date:__________
Date: Reviewed By:/ ',
Health Physics Procedure GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Quantile Plot For Cobalt -60 Survey Unit: Survey Unit Name: Mean: 9106-0007 Discharge Canal 2.45E-01 pCi/g Co-60 Rank Percentage
-1.89E-02 1 3 %-1.46E-02 2 10 %8.10E-03 3 17 %1.35E-02 4 23 %1.86E-02 5 30 %2.79E-02 6 37 %3.42E-02 7 43 %4.96E-02 8 50 %1.65E-01 9 57 %1.90E-01 10 63 %3.14E-01 11 70 %3.96E-01 12 77 %4.31 E-01 13 83 %5.43E-01 14 90 %1.1OE+00 15 97 %Prepared By: Reviewed By: e&#xfd;)4,z Date: -'/ Date:
Health Physics Procedure GGGR-R5123 -Rev. CY-00 I Attachment C Quantile Plot For Strontium
-90 Survey Unit: 9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean: 6.65E-03 pCi/g 5.OOE-02 4.OOE-02 3.OOE-02 r 2.OOE-02 0.1.OOE-02 _" 0.OOE+00 0 O 20 40 60 80 10-1.OOE-02-2.PeE-02 Percentage Sr-90 Rank Percentage
-9.81 E-03 1 3 %-6.42E-03 2 10 %-2.21E-03 3 17 %-2.18E-03 4 23 %3.43E-03 5 30 %3.92E-03 6 37 %4.74E-03 7 43 %5.58E-03 8 50 %7.39E-03 9 57 %8.57E-03 10 63 %8.97E-03 11 70 %1.12E-02 12 77 %1.76E-02 13 83 %2.15E-02 14 90 %4.04E-02 15 97 %Prepared By: Reviewed By: Date: 1'-3. {-0d Date:
Health Physics Procedure GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Frequency Plot For Cs -137 Survey Unit: 9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean: 0.229 pCi/g W 0 Cr U.6 5-4-3-2-1-0-0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 Upper End Value (pCilg)Upper End Observation Observation
%Value Frequency Frequency 0.00 1 7%0.10 5 33%0.20 2 13%0.30 2 13%0.40 2 13%0.50 2 13%0.60 1 7%Total 15 100%Prepared By: Date: -16P- 5Y -Ot Reviewed By:-Date: Date: A54 ,e /leey, Health Physics Procedure GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Frequency Plot For Co -60 Survey Unit: 9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean: 0.245 pCi/g Upper End Observation Observation
%Value Frequency Frequency 0.00 2 13%0.25 8 53%0.50 3 20%0.75 1 7%1.00 0 0%1.25 1 7%Total 15 100%5e j x "- " Zo- //Prepared By: Date: t" 40- R *-?!~2~Q Reviewed By: Date: / ~ ~Reviewed By: Date:-/04//e79-ell /
Health Physics Procedure GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Frequency Plot For Sr -90 Survey Unit: 9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean: 0.008 pCi/g 8-.4 -0*3m.m.0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 Upper End Value (pCi/g)Upper End Observation Observation
%Value Frequency Frequency 0.00 4 27%0.01 7 47%0.02 2 13%0.03 1 7%0.04 0 0%0.05 1 7%Total 15 100%Prepared By: Reviewed By: 2~W~4t~Date: 10-31-0 Date: / 5/ '
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2e Sign Test Calculation (1 Page)
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2e Sign Test Calculation (1 Page)
Health Physics Procedure OPP-GGGR-R5]2 1 -000 Attachment A. Rev. CY-00 I MAJOR Sign Test Calculation Sheet For Multiple Radionuclisdes
;urvey Unit Number. Survey Media: Survey Unit Name: 9106-0007 WP&IR#: 2006-021 Classification
: 2 TYPE I (a error):0.05 TYPE I (b error):0.05 Radionuclides:
Cs-137 Co-60 Sr-90 Survey Design DCGL (pCi/g): 6.01 2.90 1.18 Results Cs-137 Results Co-60 Results Sr-90 Weighted Sum (W,) DCGL-Result Sign 3.20E-02 4.96E-02 5.58E-03 2.72E-02 9.73E-01 1 4.41E-01 2.79E-02 3.43E-03 8.59E-02 9.14E-01 I 1.98E-0I -1.89E-02 1.12E-02 3.59E-02 9.64E-01 1 9.66E-03 3.42E-02 -6.42E-03 7.97E-03 9.92E-01 I 5.38E-01 1.90E-01 4.04E-02 1.89E-01 8.11E-01 1 2.51E-01 4.31E-01 4.74E-03 1.95E-01 8.05E-01 I 2.26E-01 3.14E-01 8.57E-03 1.53E-01 8.47E-01 1-1.62E-02
-1.46E-02 8.97E-03 -1.22E-04 1.OOE+00 1 2.21E-02 1.86E-02 -9.81E-03 1.77E-03 9.98E-01 1 3.94E-01 1.10E+00 3.92E-03 4.49E-01 5.51 E-01 1 2.32E-02 1.35E-02 7.39E-03 1.48E-02 9.85E-01 I 1.62E-02 8.1OE-03 1.76E-02 2.04E-02 9.80E-01 1 1.82E-01 3.96E-01 -2.18E-03 1.65E-01 8.35E-01 I 4.82E-01 1.65E-01 2.15E-02 1.55E-01 8.45E-01 1 3.94E-01 5.43 E-01 -2.21E-03 2.51E-01 7.49E-01 1 Number of Positive Differences (S+): 15 Critical Value: 11 Survey Unit: Meets Acceptance Criterion Performed By:_____ ____ ____ Date: / I2,t/Q-/0 ndependent Review: _ _ _ _ _ _Date: _ ,_, __ __Page 1 of I DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2f COMPASS DQA Surface Soil Report with Retrospective Power Curve (3 Pages)
DQA Surface Soil Report Assessment Summary Site: Planner(s):
Survey Unit Name: Report Number: Survey Unit Samples: Reference Area Samples: Test Performed:
Judgmental Samples: Assessment


==
Health Physics Procedure                OPP-GGGR-R5]2 1-000 Attachment A. Rev. CY-00 I MAJOR Sign Test Calculation Sheet For Multiple Radionuclisdes
Conclusion:==
;urvey Unit Number. Survey Media:
Survey Unit Name: 9106-0007 WP&IR#: 2006-021 Classification : 2                          TYPE I (a error):0.05                    TYPE I (b error):0.05 Radionuclides:      Cs-137                Co-60                          Sr-90 Survey Design DCGL (pCi/g):            6.01                  2.90                            1.18 Results Cs-137      Results Co-60      Results Sr-90      Weighted Sum (W,)      DCGL-Result              Sign 3.20E-02            4.96E-02          5.58E-03              2.72E-02                9.73E-01              1 4.41E-01            2.79E-02          3.43E-03              8.59E-02                9.14E-01              I 1.98E-0I            -1.89E-02          1.12E-02              3.59E-02                9.64E-01              1 9.66E-03            3.42E-02          -6.42E-03              7.97E-03                9.92E-01              I 5.38E-01            1.90E-01          4.04E-02              1.89E-01                8.11E-01              1 2.51E-01            4.31E-01          4.74E-03              1.95E-01                8.05E-01              I 2.26E-01            3.14E-01          8.57E-03              1.53E-01                8.47E-01              1
    -1.62E-02            -1.46E-02          8.97E-03            -1.22E-04                1.OOE+00              1 2.21E-02              1.86E-02        -9.81E-03              1.77E-03                9.98E-01              1 3.94E-01            1.10E+00          3.92E-03            4.49E-01                5.51 E-01              1 2.32E-02              1.35E-02          7.39E-03              1.48E-02                9.85E-01              I 1.62E-02            8.1OE-03          1.76E-02            2.04E-02                9.80E-01              1 1.82E-01            3.96E-01          -2.18E-03              1.65E-01                8.35E-01              I 4.82E-01              1.65E-01        2.15E-02              1.55E-01                8.45E-01              1 3.94E-01            5.43 E-01        -2.21E-03            2.51E-01                7.49E-01              1 Number of Positive Differences (S+):            15 Critical Value:          11              Survey Unit:          Meets Acceptance Criterion Performed By:_____              ____      ____                      Date:    /          I2,t/Q-/0 ndependent Review:  _      _      _    _      _    _Date:                    _    ,_,              __    __
Page 1 of I
 
DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2f COMPASS DQA Surface Soil Report with Retrospective Power Curve (3 Pages)
 
DQA Surface Soil Report Assessment Summary Site:                                      9106-0007 (19 mrem/yr)
Planner(s):                                  Dale Randall Survey Unit Name:                          9106-0007 Report Number:                              1 Survey Unit Samples:                        15 Reference Area Samples:                    0 Test Performed:                            Sign                              Test Result:        Not Performed Judgmental Samples:                        0                                  EMC Result:          Not Performed Assessment
 
== Conclusion:==
Reject Null Hypothesis (Survey Unit PASSES)
Retrospective Power Curve
                    .,      I I    0.9
                  ,    0.8      -- il-                                          -
                    . 0.7          ;!'                                          -          ,---
                                  -"11-          _I                                    1    i
* 0.6
_                                      1 0.5        1!11 I=
                                  -:1        ___
S0.4 S0.3 P: 0.2 ff"izz_
Z 0.1
                        =-0 0.0          0.2            0.4          0.6          0.8        1.0      1.2 Unity Rule Sumt-of-Ratios, including background
                      -  -    Prospective Power        U    I-beta                .... Actual Power LBGR                  -  -  Estimated Power DCGL                  ---    Retrospective Power
          .0.0                                                1111/2006                                            Page 1 COMPASS vi COMPASS  v0.0.0                                                1111/2006                                            Page I
 
DQA Surface Soil Report Survey Unit Data NOTE:  Type = "S"indicates survey unit sample.
Type = "R" indicates reference area sample.
Sample Number                    Type          Co-60 (pCi/g)        Cs-137 (pCi/g)            SrY-90 (pCi/g) 9106-0007-001F                    S                0.05                  0.03                      0.01 9106-0007-002F                    S                0.03                  0.44                        0 9106-0007-003F                    S                -0.02                  0.2                      0.01 9106-0007-004F                    S                0.03                  0.01                      -0.01 9106-0007-005F                    S                0.19                  0.54                      0.04 9106-0007-007F                    S                0.43                  0.25                        0 9106-0007-011 F                    S                0.31                  0.23                      0.01 9106-0007-012F                    S                -0.01                -0.02                      0.01 9106-0007-013F                    S                0.02                  0.02                      -0.01 9106-0007-014F                    S                1.1                  0.39                        0 9106-0007-015F                    S                0.01                  0.02                      0.01 9106-0007-018F                    S                0.01                  0.02                      0.02 9106-0007-019F                    S                0.4                  0.18                        0 9106-0007-020F                    S                0.16                  0.48                      0.02 9106-0007-021 F                    S                0.54                  0.39                        0 Modified Data (Unity Rule SOR)
NOTE:   Type = "S"indicates survey unit sample.
Type = "R" indicates reference area sample.
Sample Number                            Type          Sum-of-Ratios (SOR) 9106-0007-001 F                            S                    0.03 9106-0007-002F                              S                    0.09 9106-0007-003F                              S                    0.04 9106-0007-004F                              S                    0.01 9106-0007-005F                              S                    0.19 9106-0007-007F                              S                    0.19 9106-0007-01 IF                            S                    0.15 9106-0007-012F                              S                      0 9106-0007-013F                              S                      0 9106-0007-014F                              S                    0.45 9106-0007-015F                              S                    0.01 9106-0007-018F                              S                    0.02 9106-0007-019F                              S                    0.16 9106-0007-020F                              S                    0.16 9106-0007-021 F                            S                    0.25 COMPASS v1.0.0                                                111112006                                          Page 2


9106-0007 (19 mrem/yr)Dale Randall 9106-0007 1 15 0 Sign Test Result: Not Performed 0 EMC Result: Not Performed Reject Null Hypothesis (Survey Unit PASSES)Retrospective Power Curve., I I 0.9 , 0.8.0.70.6 0.5 S0.4 S0.3 P: 0.2 Z 0.1=-0--il- -;!' -,----"11- _I 1 i_ 1 I= 1!11-:1 ___ff"izz_0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Unity Rule Sumt-of-Ratios, including background
                    '   DQA Surface Soil Report Basic Statistical Quantities Summary Statistic                 Survey Unit       Background DQO Results Sample Number                 15                 N/A       N=13 Mean (SOR)                   0.12               N/A       0.11 Median (SOR)                 0.09               N/A       N/A Std Dev (SOR)                 0.12               N/A       0.07 High Value (SOR)             0.45               N/A       N/A Low Value (SOR)               0.00               N/A       N/A COMPASS vl.0.0                         111112006                       Page 3}}
--Prospective Power U I-beta ....Actual Power LBGR --Estimated Power DCGL --- Retrospective Power 1.2 COMPASS vi .0.0 1111/2006 Page 1 COMPASS v0.0.0 1111/2006 Page I DQA Surface Soil Report Survey Unit Data NOTE: Type = "S" indicates survey unit sample.Type = "R" indicates reference area sample.Sample Number 9106-0007-001F 9106-0007-002F 9106-0007-003F 9106-0007-004F 9106-0007-005F 9106-0007-007F 9106-0007-011 F 9106-0007-012F 9106-0007-013F 9106-0007-014F 9106-0007-015F 9106-0007-018F 9106-0007-019F 9106-0007-020F 9106-0007-021 F Type S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S Co-60 (pCi/g)0.05 0.03-0.02 0.03 0.19 0.43 0.31-0.01 0.02 1.1 0.01 0.01 0.4 0.16 0.54 Cs-137 (pCi/g)0.03 0.44 0.2 0.01 0.54 0.25 0.23-0.02 0.02 0.39 0.02 0.02 0.18 0.48 0.39 SrY-90 (pCi/g)0.01 0 0.01-0.01 0.04 0 0.01 0.01-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0 0.02 0 Modified Data (Unity Rule SOR)NOTE: Type = "S" indicates survey unit sample.Type = "R" indicates reference area sample.Sample Number 9106-0007-001 F 9106-0007-002F 9106-0007-003F 9106-0007-004F 9106-0007-005F 9106-0007-007F 9106-0007-01 IF 9106-0007-012F 9106-0007-013F 9106-0007-014F 9106-0007-015F 9106-0007-018F 9106-0007-019F 9106-0007-020F 9106-0007-021 F Type S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S Sum-of-Ratios (SOR)0.03 0.09 0.04 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.15 0 0 0.45 0.01 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.25 COMPASS v1.0.0 111112006 Page 2
' DQA Surface Soil Report Basic Statistical Quantities Summary Statistic Survey Unit Background DQO Results Sample Number 15 N/A N=13 Mean (SOR) 0.12 N/A 0.11 Median (SOR) 0.09 N/A N/A Std Dev (SOR) 0.12 N/A 0.07 High Value (SOR) 0.45 N/A N/A Low Value (SOR) 0.00 N/A N/A COMPASS vl.0.0 111112006 Page 3}}

Revision as of 12:34, 23 November 2019

Final Status Survey Final Report Phase IV, Appendix A7, Survey Unit Release Record 9106-0007, Discharge Canal
ML063400442
Person / Time
Site: Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date: 11/15/2006
From: Newson C
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co
To:
NRC/FSME
References
9106-0007
Download: ML063400442 (215)
v • d • e


Text

-ok8e f1 Final Status Survey Final Report Phase IV Appendix A7 Survey Unit Release Record 9106-0007, Discharge Canal November 2006

CYAPCO FINAL STATUS SURVEY RELEASE RECORD DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 Prepared By: Date:

FýSS~gieer Reviewed By: Date:-

FSS 1neer Approved B e p// /ýD Technical Support Manager Revision 0

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION ................................................................. 3
2. CLASSIFICATION BASIS ...................................................................... 3
3. DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (DQO) .................................................... 5
4. SURVEY DESIGN ..................................................................................... 8
5. SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................ 11
6. SURVEY RESULTS ............................................................................... 12
7. QUALITY CONTROL ............................................................................. 14
8. INVESTIGATIONS AND RESULTS ...................................................... 14
9. REMEDIATION AND RESULTS ............................................................. 14
10. CHANGES FROM THE FINAL STATUS SURVEY PLAN ..................... 14
11. DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT (DQA) ................................................. 14
12. A NO MA LIES ........................................................................................... 15
13. CO NC LUSIO N ....................................................................................... 15
14. ATTACHMENTS ..................................................................................... 16 14.1 Attachment 1 - Figures (6 pages including cover) 14.2 Attachment 2 - Sample and Statistical Data (192 pages including covers)

Revision 0

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION Survey Unit 9106-0007 (Discharge Canal) is designated as Final Status Survey (FSS) Class 2 and consists of approximately 8,692 m2 (2.15 acres) of water covered sediment in an area located approximately 0.77 miles from the reference coordinate system benchmark used at the Haddam Neck Plant (HINP)

(see Attachment 1, Figure 1). The Discharge Canal is a man-made mile long waterway that runs parallel to, and ultimately communicates with the Connecticut River. The Discharge Canal is subdivided into fifteen (15) survey units including two (2) permanent wetland areas for FSS purposes. The survey unit is bounded as follows: Discharge Canal Survey Unit 9106-0006 is to the north (called north as orientated with the north to south flow of the Connecticut River), survey area 9521 is to the east, Discharge Canal Survey Unit 9106-0008 is to the south and Discharge Canal Survey Unit 9106-0013 is to the west. The survey unit comprises the canal sediments to the deeper of three (3) feet or the original construction depth and it extends up the canal banks to the mean high water level.

A distinguishing feature of this Survey Unit is that it completely surrounds Class 1 survey unit 9106-0015. Survey Unit 9106-0015 was created in response to receiving a sample result (9106-0007-017F) which exceeded the design limits for a class 2 Survey Unit. The design changes made to accommodate the removal of this 1,170 m 2 area from the initial design for Survey Unit 9106-0007 is discussed in section 4.

This survey unit is bounded by reference coordinates E026 through E032 by S122 through S140 (refer to License Termination Plan Section 5.4.4). The reference coordinates provide the maximum dimensions of a rectangle containing this survey unit. Some areas contained in this rectangle may not be part of this survey unit. The boundary of the survey unit was defined using a Global Positioning System (GPS) based on the Connecticut State Plane System North American Datum (NAD) 1927.

2. CLASSIFICATION BASIS The survey unit was classified in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-10, "Survey Unit Classification." The historical information, scoping analyses and characterization results provided sufficient data to designate Survey Unit 9106-0007 as Class 2 in May 2006.

The "Classification Basis Summary" conducted for this survey unit consisted of:

a) A review of the 10CFR50.75 (g) (1) database, b) A review of the "InitialCharacterizationReport" and the "HistoricSite Assessment (HSA) Supplement, "

c) Historic and current survey records review, d) Visual inspections and a "walkdown."

Revision 0 3 Revision 0 3

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD e) Formal or informal interviews with cognizant personnel.

A review of the 10CFR50.75(g)(1) database report identified a number of events that may have impacted this survey unit. In 1986, samples of the 1979 dredge spoils area and canal sediment were taken. The sample analyses indicated that the concentrations of Cs-137, Co-60 and other radionuclides were a small fraction of the DCGL for those nuclides that could be identified by gamma spectroscopy. (refer to NE-86-RA-1142 dated 11-13-86). None the available information indicates that the residual activity present is likely to be above the DCGL for the area.

Additional information was provided by several historical documents, including the "Results of Scoping Survey", (completed 9/1/98), the "Historical Site Assessment", and the HSA Supplement (dated 6-30-00). These documents presented the results of several sediment samples taken in 1997. These sample results indicated concentrations of 0.5 pCi/g for Co-60, 0.024pCi/g for Cs-134 and 0.722 pCi/g for Cs-137.

An initial characterization survey was implemented during April and May of 2004. Six (6) samples from three (3) locations were obtained by biased sampling throughout the area. The samples were analyzed off-site by gamma spectroscopy and with radiochemical analyses for Sr-90 and Tritium. Hard-to-Detect analyses were also conducted on one (1) of the six (6) samples. The only plant-related dosimetrically significant radionuclides identified in the samples were Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90. No samples indicated radioactive material in quantities above the ten (10) mrem/yr design DCGL. Co-60 accounted for the majority of the dose in these samples with a maximum concentration of 0.44 pCi/g.

A final characterization was performed by Site Closure personnel in April of 2006. Six (6) sediment samples from six (6) locations were taken. All of the samples were analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. Based on the initial and final characterization results, the radionuclides of concern identified in the sample data for FSS planning purposes were Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90. Since HTD analyses were not performed for all radionuclides of interest during characterization, additional HTD analyses were performed as a part of the FSS.

The statistics for each of the radionuclides of concern are listed in Table 1.

Revision 0 4 Revision 0 4

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Table 1 - Basic Statistical Quantities for Cs-137,,Co-6)0 and Sr-90 fromn thle tharacterizaition Surveyý Minimum Value: -8.61E-02 2.15E-03 2.44E-02 Maximum Value: 5.3 8E-01 4.36E-01 5.25E-02 Mean: 1.84E-01 1.35E-01 3.61E-02 Median: 1.79E-01 7.32E-02 3.55E-02 Standard Deviation: 2.27E-01 1.68E-01 1.10E-02 NOTE: The Operational DCGLs are 6.01 pCi/g for Cs-137, 2.90 pCi/g for Co-60 and 1.18 for Sr-90; these are used in conjunction with the unity rule to achieve 19 mrem/yr TEDE The FSS Engineer performed a visual inspection and walkdown during May 2006 to assess the physical condition of the survey unit, evaluate access points and travel paths and identify potentially hazardous conditions.

Based upon the historical information and the results of radiological surveys performed during characterization, it was concluded that there was a low probability for residual radioactivity to be present in this survey unit in concentrations greater than the Operational DCGLs justifying a final survey unit classification of Class 2 (refer to Section 3).

3. DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (DQO)

FSS design and planning is based on the Data Quality Objective (DQO) process as described by the LTP, Procedure RPM 5.1-11, "Preparationof FinalStatus Survey Plan," and the "Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual" (MARSSIM). A summary of the main features of the DQO process are provided herein.

The DQO process incorporates hypothesis testing and probabilistic sampling distributions to control decision errors during data analysis. Hypothesis testing is a process based on the scientific method that compares a baseline condition to an alternate condition. The baseline condition is technically known as the null hypothesis. Hypothesis testing rests on the premise that the null hypothesis is true and that sufficient evidence must be provided for rejection. In designing the survey plan, the underlying assumption, or null hypothesis was that residual activity in the survey unit exceeded the release criteria. Rejection of the null hypothesis would satisfy the release criteria objective of the FSS.

The primary objective of the Final Status Survey Plan (FSSP) was to demonstrate that the level of residual radioactivity in Survey Unit 9106-0007 did not exceed the release criteria specified in the LTP and that the potential Revision 0 5 Revision 0 5

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD dose from residual radioactivity is As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA).

A fundamental precursor to survey design is to establish a relationship between the release criteria and some measurable quantity. This is done through the development of Derived Concentration Guideline Levels (DCGLs). The DCGLs represent the concentration of radioactivity above background, equivalent to a dose-based release criterion and is presented in terms of surface or mass activity concentrations. Chapter 6 of the LTP describes in detail the modeling used to develop the DCGLs for soil (called Base Case Soil DCGL),

for existing groundwater radioactivity and for future groundwater radioactivity that will be contributed by building foundations and footings.

As described in detail in the LTP, the dose model applied to the discharge canal presumes that the canal sediments are dredged to a depth of three (3) feet below the top of the sediment layer and spread for the planting of crops per the Resident Farmer Scenario. Consequently, the soil DCGLs are directly applied to the canal sediment media.

The DCGLs presented in Chapter 6 of the LTP were developed for exposures from three (3) components, that is, residual radioactivity in soil, existing groundwater radioactivity, and future groundwater radioactivity from the burial of concrete foundations or footings from site buildings containing residual radioactivity. Equation 1 shows the mathematical relationship between the three (3) components and the total dose.

Equation 1.

HTotal=Hsoil (sediment) + HExisting GW + HFuture GW The total dose under the LTP criteria is twenty-five (25) mrem/yr TEDE from all three components. The allowable total dose under the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) radiological remediation standard for Connecticut Yankee (CY) is nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE. To satisfy both the LTP and CY CTDEP criteria, the dose from soil must be reduced when using the existing and future groundwater dose values discussed above.

This survey unit is not affected by either existing or future groundwater (reference CY memo ISC 06-024). Therefore, dose contribution from both groundwater components is zero (0) mrem/yr TEDE, based on field data.

Equation 2:

19 mrern/yrTotal= 19 mrem/yrsoil+0 mrem/yrExisting GW+O mrem/yrFuture GW The allowable dose for soil in this survey unit is nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE as shown by Equation 2 above. The concentration of residual radioactivity Revision 0 6

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD resulting in nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE is designated as the Operational DCGL, and has been established for the radionuclides of concern as provided in Table 2.

Note: The survey design used a much smaller value for investigation than the Operational DCGL provided by Table 2 to conservatively account for the contribution to the total dose from existing and future groundwater which had not been established at the time of planning the FSS.

T~able 2 - Radionuclide Specific ~Base Cs olD';, prtoa C~

and Required Minimumn Detectable Concentrations, Radionuclide ( Base Case Soil Operational DML, Reqnihred MDC-H-3 4.12E+02 3.13E+02 1.65E+01 C-14 5.66E+00 4.30E+00 2.26E-01 Mn-54 1.74E+01 1.32E+01 6.96E-0I Fe-55 2.74E+04 2.08E+04 1.1 OE+03 Co-60 3.8 1 E+00 2.90E+00 1.52E-01 Ni-63 7.23E+02 5.49E+02 2.89E+OI Sr-90 1.55E+00 1.18E+00 6.20E-02 Nb-94 7.12E+00 5.41E+00 2.85E-01 Tc-99 1.26E+01 9.58E+00 5.04E-0I Ag-108m 7.14E+00 5.43E+00 2.86E-0I Cs-134 4.67E+00 3.55E+00 1.87E-01 Cs-137 7.91E+00 6.01E+00 3.16E-0I Eu-152 1.01E+O1 7.68E+00 4.04E-0I Eu-154 9.29E+00 7.06E+00 3.72E-01 Eu-155 3.92E+02 2.98E+02 1.57E+01 Pu-238 2.96E+OI 2.25E+01 1.1 8E+00 Pu-239/240 2.67E+O I 2.03E+01 1.07E+00 Pu-241 8.70E+02 6.61 E+02 3.48E+O1 Am-241 () 2.58E+O1 1.96E+01 1.03E+00 Cm-243/244 2.90E+O1 2.20E+O1 1.16E+00 (1) Bold indicates those radionuclides considered to be Hard to Detect (HTD)

(2) The Base Case Soil DCGLs for soil are specified by the LTP in Chapter 6 and are equivalent to twenty-five (25) mrem/yr TEDE (3) The Operational DCGL is equivalent to nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE (4) The required MDC is equivalent to one (1) mrem/yr TEDE (5) Americium-241 can be analyzed by gamma and alpha spectroscopy and is considered to be Easy to Detect (ETD). The preferred result is the alpha spectroscopy's when both analyses are performed.

Revision 0 7 Revision 0 7

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Another important facet of the DQO process is to identify the radionuclides of concern and determine the concentration variability. Initial characterization was performed in April of 2004 as discussed in Section 2. Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90 were found to be the predominate radionuclides of concern. The basic statistical quantities (i.e., mean, standard deviation, median) for Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90 are provided in Table 1.

As part of the DQOs applied to laboratory processes, analysis results were reported as actual calculated results. Results reported as less than Minimum Detectable Concentration (<MDC) were not accepted for FSS. Sample report summaries included unique sample identification, analytical method, radionuclide, result, and uncertainty to two (2) standard deviations, laboratory data qualifiers, units, and the required and observed MDC.

4. SURVEY DESIGN The level of effort associated with planning a survey is based on the complexity of the survey and nature of the hazards. Guidance for preparing FSS plans is provided in Procedure RPM 5.1-11, "Preparation of Final Status Survey Plans ".

This survey was initially designed to ten (10) mrem/yr TEDE. At the time when the survey was designed, the dose contribution for existing and future groundwater had not yet been determined. Subsequently, a conservative value was chosen for the Operational DCGL. This approach is no longer required as the total dose from existing and future groundwater has been established. The dose for soil used for this survey unit to demonstrate compliance with the LTP criteria is nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE, as discussed in Section 2 of this Release Record.

The DQO process determined that Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90 were the radionuclides of concern (refer to Section 3). The sum of fractions or unity rule was used with the individual Operational DCGLs because multiple radionuclides (Cs-137, Co-60 and Sr-90) were considered in the survey design.

Surrogate DCGLs were not required for this survey unit based on process knowledge from FSS of nearby adjacent areas and via screening process described in LTP Section 5.4.7.2, "Gross Activity DCGLs". Sr-90 concentrations in sediment and soil were ascertained by direct analysis.

The Elevated Measurement Comparison (EMC) did not apply to this survey unit since the survey unit is a Class 2 and discrete, elevated areas of contamination were not expected.

The Sign Test was selected as the non-parametric statistical test to demonstrate that the null hypothesis was rejected. The use of the Sign Test did not require the selection or use of a background reference area, which simplified survey design and implementation. In addition, this approach is conservative since it includes background Cs- 137 as part of the sample set.

Revision 0 8 Revision 0 8

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD The number of soil samples for FSS was determined in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-12, "Determination of the Number of Samples for Final Status Survey. " The Lower Bound of the Gray Region (LBGR) was set in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-11 to 0.735 to maintain the relative shift (A/G) in the range of 1 and 3. The resulting relative shift was 2.0. A Prospective Power Curve was generated using COMPASS, a software package developed under the sponsorship of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) for implementation of the MARSSIM in support of the decommissioning license termination rule (10 CFR 20, Subpart E). The result of the COMPASS computer run showed adequate power for the survey design.

This indicates that the survey unit has a high probability of rejecting the null hypothesis, assuming that the characterization data are representative of the FSS results. Survey design specified fifteen (15) sediment core samples for non-parametric statistical testing.

The grid pattern and locations of the soil samples were determined using Visual Sample Plan (VSP) in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-14, "Identifying, and Marking Surface Sample Locations for Final Status Survey. " Visual Sample Plan was created by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) for the United States Department of Energy. A systematic triangular grid pattern with a random starting point was selected for sample design, which is appropriate for a Class 2 area.

Judgmental sampling was included as a feature of this survey design to account for any anomalies potentially identified in the field.

Sample locations were identified using AutoCAD-LT, a commercially available plotting software package with coordinates consistent with the Connecticut State Plane System. These coordinates were integrated with a GPS to locate sample locations in the field. Sample Measurement Locations for the design are listed with the GPS coordinates in Table 3.

Revision 0 9 Revision 0 9

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Twtable 3 -Sample Measurement Locations with ssoiated GPS Coordinates D~esignationi "> Northing,ý; Easting<1 >

9106-0007-001F 235298.00 672291.87 9106-0007-002F 235219.74 672246.68 9106-0007-003F 235219.74 672337.05 9106-0007-004F 235141.48 672291.87 9106-0007-005F 235141.48 672382.24 9106-0007-007F 235063.21 672427.42 9106-0007-01 IF 234984.95 672562.98 9106-0007-012F 234984.95 672653.35 9106-0007-013F 234906.69 672608.17 9106-0007-014F 234906.69 672698.54 9106-0007-015F 234828.42 672653.35 9106-0007-018F 235215.38 672389.46 9106-0007-019F 235001.08 672542.82 9106-0007-020F 234942.33 672625.39 9106-0007-021F 235106.22 672362.88 The sample location designations of Table 3 are not sequential due to changes made as a result of carving out Survey Unit 9106-0015 from the interior of this survey unit, and the relocation of samples due to accessibility of sample locations.

Samples locations 9106-0007-009F and 9106-0007-OIOF were found to be on dry land, consequently, they were randomly relocated using the VSP software to two (2) new locations designated as 9106-0007-016F and 9106-0007-017F.

When the sample result for 9106-0007-017F was received from the off-site laboratory, it was determined that the sample exceeded the Operational DCGL of nineteen (19) mrem/yr (the sample's activity was equivalent to 22.4 mrem/yr). Since sample results cannot exceed the DCGL in a Class 2 area, an approximately the FSS design square rectangle of 1,170 m2 was removed from the footprint of for Survey Unit 9106-0007.

A consequence of removing Survey Unit 9106-0015 from Survey Unit 9106-0007 was that four (4) sample locations were now located outside the boundary of Survey Unit 9106-0007, and needed to be relocated. The samples locations were relocated using randomly generated locations from the VSP software. The four locations removed from the FSS survey were locations 9106-0007-006F, 008F, 016F and 017F. These were replaced with sample locations 9106-0007-018F through 9106-0007-02 1F.

Four (4) sediment samples were analyzed for the full suite of radionuclides specified in Table 1, exceeding the requirement to analyze 5% of the sample population for HTD analysis specified in procedure RPM 5.1-11. Two (2) of the four (4) samples were randomly selected using the Microsoft Excel Revision 0 10 Revision 0 10

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD "RAND" function. The two (2) samples exhibiting the highest observed radionuclide concentrations by gamma analyses were also selected.

The implementation of survey specific quality control measures as referenced by Procedure RPM 5.1-24, "Split Sample Assessment for Final Status Survey, "

included the collection of two (2) soil samples for "split sample" analysis by the off-site laboratory. These locations were selected randomly using the Microsoft Excel "RAND" function. The number of quality control samples exceeded the 5% requirement.

The LTP specifies that scanning is not required for the FSS of the Discharge Canal. Table 4 provides a synopsis of the survey design.

Table 4 -Synopsis of IheScie-,'nr ýIesiyn¶')

Feature~~ Design Criteria ~Basi Survey Unit Land 8,692 m 2 Based on AutoCAD-LT and Visual Area Sample Plan calculations Type I and Type 2 errors were 0.05, Number of 15 sigma was 0.133 the LBGR was set to Measurements 0.735 to maintain Relative Shift in the range of I and 3, Relative Shift was 2.0 Grid Spacing(2) 27.6 m Based on triangular grid 3.16 pCi/g Cs-137 Design DCGL 1.52 pCi/g Co-60 To achieve ten (10) mrem/yr TEDE 0.62 pCi/g Sr-90 6.01 pCi/g Cs-137 To achieve nineteen (19) mrem/yr Operational 2.90 pCi/g Co-60 TEDE (3) to demonstrate compliance DCGL 1.18 pCi/g Sr-90 with Equation 2 of this Release Record Scan Coverage N/A The LTP exempts this area Sediment 6.01 pCi/g Cs-137 The Operational DCGL meets the LTP Investigation 2.90 pCi/g Co-60 criteria for a Class 2 survey unit Level 1.18 pCi/g Sr-90 (1) The survey design used a much smaller value for investigation than the Operational DCGL provided by Table 2 as the total dose from existing and future groundwater had not been established at the time of planning the FSS (2) These values are based on the 9,862 m2 size of the initial survey unit design. I.e. Survey Unit 9106-0015 was a part of Survey Unit 9106-0007 when the grid sizes were calculated.

(3) The allowable dose for soil in this survey unit is nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE as the bounding dose from existing and future groundwater has been established based on field data (reference CY memo ISC 06-024.)

5. SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION Final Status Survey field activities were conducted under Work Plan and Inspection Record (WP&IR) 2006-0021. The WP&IR package included a detailed FSSP, job safety analysis, job planning checklist and related procedures for reference. Daily briefings were conducted to discuss the expectations for job performance and the safety aspects of the survey. The "Daily Survey Revision 0 I1I Revision 0 11

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Journal" was used to document field activities and other information pertaining to the FSS.

Measurement locations were identified in North American Datum (NAD) 1927 coordinates that were supplied to the sampling vendor, Ocean Survey, Inc.

(OSI) of Old Saybrook, Connecticut. Discharge Canal sampling was accomplished using direct push technology to collect composite samples of bottom and mean high water mark sediments. Sediment cores from the Discharge Canal were obtained by OSI using a vibrating corer that is platform mounted on a sampling vessel. The core barrel was a three (3) inch diameter thin-walled aluminum tube which also served as a core liner (ten (10) feet or less). A core catcher was available to prevent the sample from sliding out of the bottom of the tube. Vessel positioning and the determination of sample locations were accomplished using a GPS interfaced with a navigation and data logging system.

After extraction, water was drained from above the sample by drilling holes above the sediment. The liner was cut, capped, sealed, labeled and turned over to site personnel who processed and controlled the samples under Chain of Custody (COC) protocols in accordance with procedure RPM 5.1-5, "Chain of Custody for Final Status Survey Samples ". Rinsing of the barrel and associated equipment was performed between sampling events. New aluminum tubes were used for each sample to prevent cross-contamination of subsequent samples.

The fifteen (15) sediment samples were collected and packaged in accordance with Haddam Neck Plant (1-INP) Procedure RPM 5.1-3, "Collection of Sample Media for Final Status Survey ". Samples were controlled, transported, stored, and transferred to the off-site laboratory using COC protocols.

Four (4) samples (9106-0007-001F, 9106-0007-002F, 9106-0007-014F and 9106-0007-021F) were selected for HTD radionuclide analysis by the off-site laboratory.

The implementation of survey specific quality control measures included the collection of two (2) split samples at locations 9106-0007-004F and 9106-0007-013F for "split sample" analysis by the off-site laboratory.

6. SURVEY RESULTS The off-site laboratory employed for the radiological analyses of samples was General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) - Charleston, South Carolina. The laboratory analyzed the fifteen (15) samples taken for non-parametric statistical testing and the associated duplicates using gamma spectroscopy. Sr-90 was analyzed by gas flow proportional counting. All analyses were performed to the required MDC.

Revision 0 12 Revision 0 12

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Cesium-137 was identified in ten (10), Co-60 was identified in nine (9) and Sr-90 in two (2) of the fifteen (15) samples. The results reported for the remaining sample analyses indicated that activity was present at levels approaching or below the established detection limit in the remaining samples collected and analyzed for non-parametric testing.

Several other radionuclides which were positively identified (i.e., a result greater than two (2) standard deviations uncertainty) could be de-selected or excluded using the 5% and 10% rule described in Section 5.4.7.2 of the LTP.

The off-site laboratory also processed four (4) samples for full HTD analysis as required by the sample plan. The requested analyses included alpha spectroscopy and liquid scintillation depending upon the radionuclide and the measurement method. All analyses were performed to the required MDC.

Some of the HTD radionuclides met the acceptance criteria for detection (i.e., a result greater than two (2) standard deviations uncertainty) in more than one sample; however, each of the positive results for HTD radionuclides could be de-selected based on the 5% and 10% rules.

None of the sample results exceeded the Operational DCGL or required further investigation. A summary of the sample results is provided in Table 5.

1JUO-UUU/-UU 11` J.ZUhr_,U/ 4.VOIL-UZ )... I,-U3Z5t 2./21Y.-U2-9106-0007-002F 4.41 E-0 1 2.79E-02' 3.43E-03 8.59E-02 9106-0007-003F 1.98E-01 -1.89E-02 1.1 2E-02 3.59E-02 9106-0007-004F 9.66E-03 3.42E-02 -6.42E-03 7.97E-03 9106-0007-005F 5.3 8E-0 1 1.90E-01 4.04E-02 1.89E-01 9106-0007-007F 2.5 1E-01 4.31 E-01 4.74E-03 1.95E-01 9106-0007-01 IF 2.26E-0I 3.14E-01 8.57E-03 1.53E-01 9106-0007-012F -1.62E-02 -1.46E-02 8.97E-03 -1.22E-04 9106-0007-013F 2.21 E-02 1.86E-02 -9.81 E-03 1.77E-03 9106-0007-014F 3.94E-0 1 1.1 OE+00 3.92E-03 4.49E-0 I 9106-0007-015F 2.32E-02 1.35E-02 7.39E-03 1.48E-02 9106-0007-018F 1.62E-02 8.1 OE-03 1.76E-02 2.04E-02 9106-0007-019F 1.82E-01 3.96E-01 -2.18E-03 1.65E-01 9106-0007-020F 4.82E-01 1.65E-01 2.15E-02 1.55E-01 9106-0007-021F 3.94E-01 5.43 E-01 -2.21 E-03 2.5 1E-01 (1) The Operational DCGLs from Table 2 are 6.01 pCi/g for Cs-137, 2.90 pCi/g for Co-60 and 1.18 for Sr-90; these are used in conjunction with the unity rule to achieve nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE Biased samples were not specifically called for in the sample plan, and none were deemed necessary from field observations.

Revision 0 13

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD

7. QUALITY CONTROL The off-site laboratory processed the split samples and performed gamma spectroscopy analysis. Two (2) of the samples were selected for analysis, which exceeds the 5% minimum required by the LTP. The data were evaluated using USNRC acceptance criteria specified in Inspection Procedure 84750 and as detailed in HNP Procedure RPM 5.1-24, "Split Sample Assessment for Final Status Survey. " Each of the comparisons met the acceptance criteria.

The sample analysis vendor, General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) -

Charleston, ,South Carolina, maintained quality control and quality assurance plans as part of normal operation. Refer to Attachment 2 for data and data quality analysis results.

8. INVESTIGATIONS AND RESULTS None of the sample results exceeded the operational DCGL, thus no investigations were required.
9. REMEDIATION AND RESULTS Historically, no radiological remedial action as described by MARSSIM Section 5.4 was performed in this survey unit prior to or as a result of the FSS. Health Physics TSD BCY-HP-0078, "ALARA Evaluation of Soil Remediation in Support of Final Status Survey, " determined that remediation beyond that required to meet the release criteria to be unnecessary and that the remaining residual radioactivity in soil was ALARA.
10. CHANGES FROM THE FINAL STATUS SURVEY PLAN The survey was designed to ten (10) mrem/yr TEDE which was conservative and necessary at the time of FSS planning. It is no longer required as the total dose from existing and future groundwater has been established. The dose for soil used to demonstrate compliance with the LTP criteria is nineteen (19) mrem/yr TEDE as discussed in Section 2 of this Release Record.
11. DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT (DQA)

The DQO sample design and data were reviewed in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-23, "Data Quality Assessment, " for completeness and consistency.

The sampling design had adequate power as indicated by the Retrospective Power Curve. The Sign Test was performed on the data and compared to the original assumptions of the DQOs. The Sign Test shows that the survey unit passes FSS.

Documentation was complete and legible. Surveys and sample collection were consistent with the DQOs and were sufficient to ensure that the survey unit was properly designated as Class 2.

Revision 0 14

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD The preliminary data review consisted of calculating basic statistical quantities (e.g., mean, median, standard deviation).

The sample standard deviation was slightly more than the value used for the survey design. This is represented by the shift in the retrospective power curve as shown in Attachment 2f. This would indicate a change to the original LBGR to maintain the number of samples at fifteen (15) to meet the Operational DCGL. However, the value of the LBGR is less of a critical issue as the survey unit has passed the statistical test, and the mean and median values are well below the Operational DCGL when used in conjunction with the unity rule.

Also, the retrospective power curve shows that a sufficient number of samples were collected to achieve the desired power. Therefore, the survey unit meets the release criteria with adequate power as required by the DQOs.

The range of the data, about 3.6 standard deviations, was not unusually large.

The difference between the mean and median was 25% of the standard deviation which indicates some skewness in the data. The data was represented graphically through posting plots, a frequency plot, and a quantile plot. The frequency plot shows some positive skewness as confirmed by the calculated skew of 1.37.

All data, assessments, and graphical representations are provided in Attachment 2.

12. ANOMALIES The configuration of this survey unit was changed from its initial design to a smaller Class 2 Survey Unit and a new Class 1 Survey Unit (Survey Unit #

9106-0015) that had a surface area of approximately 1,170 in 2 . The new survey unit became necessary when the sample result for 9106-0007-017F was received from the off-site laboratory, it was determined that the sample exceeded the Operational DCGL of nineteen (19) mrem/yr (the sample's activity was equivalent to 22.4 mrem/yr). Since sample results cannot exceed the DCGL in a Class 2 area, an approximately square rectangle of 1,170 m2 was removed from the footprint of the FSS design for Survey Unit 9106-0007.

Addendum 1 to the FSS plan was implemented to address the changes to the plan associated with the establishment of a new Class 1 Survey Unit and the relocation of four (4) sample points that would no longer reside within Survey Unit 9106-0007. In accordance with Addendum 1, four (4) new sample locations were identified and sampled within Survey Unit 9106-0007.

No other anomalies were noted within this survey unit.

13. CONCLUSION Survey Unit 9106-0007 has met the final DQOs of the FSS. The ALARA criteria for soils as specified in Chapter 4 of the LTP were achieved. Elevated Measurement Comparison and remediation was not required.

Revision 0 15 Revision 0 15

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD The sample data passed the Sign Test. The null hypothesis was rejected.

Graphical representation of data indicates some positive skewness that is probably due to localized differences in particulate deposition rates, hydraulic velocity and sedimentation rates. The Retrospective Power Curve generated using COMPASS shows adequate power was achieved. The survey unit was properly designated as Class 2.

The dose contribution from sediment is 2.2 mrem/yr TEDE based on the average concentration of the samples used for non-parametric statistical sampling.

This survey unit is unaffected by existing groundwater (reference CY memo ISC 06-024). It has been determined that the dose contribution from groundwater sources is zero (0) mrem/yr TEDE.

This survey unit is also not considered impacted by future groundwater radioactive contamination, as there are no concrete foundations or footings containing residual radioactive material within the groundwater saturated zone in the area (reference CY memo ISC 06-024). The dose contribution from future groundwater, the third dose component, is, therefore, zero (0) mrem/yr TEDE.

The average total dose from residual radioactivity in this survey unit, including that from sediment, will not exceed 2.2 mrem/yr Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE).

14. ATTACHMENTS 14.1 Attachment 1 - Figures 14.2 Attachment 2 - Sample and Statistical Data Revision 0 16 Revision 0 16

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 1 Figures (5 pages)

.r K

0 420 840 jjjOFeet AW-cbmrdoxam in NAM~me7d shopahi yse Connectcut Yankee Atmic Power Company Site Map With Refeince To Survey Unit9106-0007

jh.

$ Sample Location Inacvxemaille 18 sawpl Lcaaadon 0

3 Sample S Locaton 9106-0007 9 19 9 9 9 9

14 Removed Due To 0 21 20 QOation Of 2 11 Wvey Unkt 4 0 13 9106-0015 9

15 0 35 70 NoWe COMAWMa'in NAD27FbwinS Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 9106-0007FinalStatus Survey Design

SSample Locaton Sample Location

) Smple Locatonf 0

0.198 Due To 9106-0007 "0 QOation or 0.182 0 SWvy Unit 9106-0015 0.3,W 0 0.394 0 0 0 0.482 0.441 0.226 0.0097 0 0.0221 0

C4esim2-137 results am 8ivanihpCilg 0 35 70 NAD27CwcdcW ConnecticutYankee Atomic PowerCompany 9106-O007FinalStatus Survey Design Cesium-137PostingPlot

4..

Location Inacceoble Sample Locaton 0

-0.0189 9106-0007 o 0.396 9 0 0 0

1.10 Location Removed Due To 0 0.165 Oetion Of 0.0279 0.53 0.314 Sw've Unit 0.0342 9 0.086 9106-0015 0 9 Alot Cbbaft-60 result we given inpci/g.

0 35 70 MM;=

== Fed Cbomfnewsmi NAD2Cbicde SAftPINWSY ConnecticutYankee Atomic Power Company 9106-0007FinalStatus Survey Design Cobalt-60PostingPlot

4 K

SMPIC Lomdon

~)Inaccessilble 0.0176 Sample Location 0

ab011 Sample 0.0404 Locaion 0

9106-0007 -0.0022 fo 0 0 0

0.0039 Removed Dw To 0.0086 0.0215 Crecato Of 0.0034 -0.0022 Survey Unit

-0o006 0 -O.O98 9106-0015 9 9 S~Ntiu-0.0074 zSO=&= am rvenmpfi 0 35 70 graFew No-NAD27CbnAIvdhN Connecticut Yankee Atomic PowerCompany 9106-O007FinalStatus Survey Design Strontrmn-90 PostingPlot

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2 Sample and Statistical Data

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2a Sample Data (172 Pages)

Table of Contents G eneral Narrative .................................................................. 1 Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation ........... 4 Radiological Analysis .......................................................... 9 Sample Data Summary ...................................................... 28.

Q uality C ontrol D ata ........................................................... 66

General Narrative 1

CASE NARRATIVE For CONNECTICUT YANKEE RE: Sediment PO# 002332 Work Order: 163626 SDG: MSR #06-0730 June 19, 2006 Laboratory Identification:

General Engineering Laboratories, LLC Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 30712 Charleston, South Carolina 29417 Express Mail Delivery and Shipping Address:

2040 Savage Road Charleston, South Carolina 29407 Telephone Number:

(843) 556-8171 Summary:

Sample receipt The sample(s) for this Project arrived at General Engineering Laboratories, LLC, (GEL) in Charleston, South Carolina on May 24, 2006. All sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. The chain of custody contained the proper documentation and signatures.

The laboratory received the following sample(s):

Sample ID Client Sample ID 163626001 9106-0007-016F 163626002 9106-0007-017F 163626003 9106-0007-003F 163626004 9106-0007-004F 163626005 9106-0007-004FS 163626006 9106-0007-005F 163626007 9106-0007-006F 163626008 9106-0007-007F GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP,INC.

PO. Box 30712

  • Charleston, SC 29417
  • 2040 Savage Road (29407)

Phone (843) 556-8171 o Fax (843) 766-1178 . www.gel.com 2

Sample ID Client Sample ID 163626009 9106-0007-008F 163626010 9106-0007-01 IF 163626011 9106-0007-012F 163626012 9106-0007-013F 163626013 9106-0007-013FS 163626014 9106-0007-014F 163626015 9106-0007-015F 163626016 9106-0007-0OIF 163626017 9106-0007-002F Items of Note:

There are no items of note.

Case Narrative:

Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) Standard Operating Procedures. Any technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are listed below by analytical parameter.

Analytical Request:

Fifteen sediment samples were analyzed for FSSGAM and Sr-90.

Two sediment samples were analyzed for FSSALL.

Internal Chain of Custody:

Custody was maintained for the sample(s).

Data Package:

The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation and all analytical fractions.

I certify that this data package is in compliance with the SOW, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hard copy data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or a designee, as verified by the following signature.

Cheryl Jones Project Manager GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.

P.O. Box 30712 - Charleston, SC 29417 - 2040 Savage Road (29407)

Phone (843) 556-8171

  • Fax (843) 766-1178
  • www.gel.com 3

Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation 4

Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5104-003 -Attachment B-CY-001 Major Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Chain of Custody Form No. 2006-00362 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556 G______2-_____________________

___________________

Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning Analyses Requested Lab -Use

.Only,..

Contact Name & Phone: Comm s: . .

Jack McCarthy 860-267-2556 Ext. 3024 .

Analytical Lab (Name, City, State)

General Engineering Laboratories *.

2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407 843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones V)

Priority: Z 30 D. [] 14 D. [] 7D. Container .. '> ;

Sample Size- .. ;... f Media Type &Type .. . .... .

Sample Designation Date Time Code Code Code Comment, Preservation -Laib8 Ie" D

9106-0007-016F 5/10/06 14:54 SE C BP x x Transferred fromCOC 2006-00343 L1I 9106-0007-017F 5/11/06 10:39 SE C BP x x Transferred from COC 2006-00345 t *:-VI 2.

9106-0007-OOIF 5/11/06 09:43 SE C BP X Transferred from COC 2006-00345 4 z (. lot (d

ý 9106-0007-002F 5/08/06 13:27 SE C BP x Transferred from COC 2006-00329

- 9106-0007-003F 5/08/06 13:53 SE C BP x x Transferred from COC 2006-00329 .

9106-0007-004F 5/08/06 14:13 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00329[, 4 9106-0007-004FS 5/08/06 14:13 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00329 9106-0007-005F 5/08/06 14:32 SE C BP x x Transferred from COC 2006-00329 9106-0007-006F 5/08/06 14:52 SE C BP X x Transferred from COC 2006-00329 ', U., 6I 910-00700F /0/06 1452 SE C P - -. Trnsere-fo CC 06-039.I NOTES: PO#: 002332 MSR#: 06- 0736 SSWP# NA [] LTP QA [] Radwaste QA El Non QA Samples Shipped Via:

[ Fed Ex 'Temip.: Dý El ups El Hand Custdy ea l Intac~t?

1 elin)sehe Date/Time 2) R eiv Date/Time E] Other 3)eflinquished By Date/Time 4) Recei d B y Date/Time Bill of Lading #

"8-z ot~ 051 s:-.. Y*~ LI N

Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5104-003 -Attachment B-CY-001 Major Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5 104-003 -Attachment B-CY-00 1 Major Chain of Custody Form No. 2006-00363 Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 362 lnjun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556 / 23(I, .".

Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning Analyses Requested Lab U Onlquestedy~avT*s,.:

Contact Name & Phone: ~Commients:

Jack McCarthy 860-267-2556 Ext. 3024

~ ~

Analytical Lab (Name, City, State)

.. , .

General Engineering Laboratories 2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407 0 - , . ,

843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones V)

Priority: 30 D.[ 14 D. L]I7 D. Container -

Sample Size-Media Type &Type *  : #

Sample Designation Date Time Code Code Code -,: - Comment, Preservation Lab: c 91 06-0007-007F 5/08/06 15:11 SE C BP Transferred from COC 2006-00329

-

  • 0~i~ 9106-0007-008F 5/09/06 10:39 SE C BP x - Transferred from COC 2006-00334 19106-0007-01 IF 5/09/06 09:43 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 4ý f i Z.

9106-0007-012F ,

5/09/06 13:27 SE C BP x X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 ,16 9106-0007-013F 5/09/06 13:53 SE 9106-0007-013FS C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 t2 5/09/06 14:13 SE C BP X

, 9106-0007-014F 5/09/06 14:13 SE X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 1 4,362 013 C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 S9106-0007-015F 5/16/06 07:56 SE C BP x x Transferred from COC 2006-00353 43 2 4,"w..

NOTES: PO #: 002332 MSR#: 06- 0730 SSWP#NA SLTP QA Samples Shipped Via:

0ctý5(3/ FZ Radwaste QA E] Non QA Intenial Cuitainer

[ Fed Ex ZUPS

[]Hand Cxstociy, ealed?

I) ,linquis Date/Time 2) R eiv By Date/Time Cyuý.ody ýeal ntact?

LI Other

3) Relinquished By Date/Time 4) Rec ivedBy Date/Time Bill of Lading #

-7q)-l 673 6

0 SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM 01 PM use only Client: co',SDG/ARCOC/Work Order: t k7ý D ecv PM(A) Review (ensure n-con are resolved prior to signing):

Receivred ~ fj By:___________________

Sample Receipt Criteria Comments/Qualifiers (Required for Non-Conforming Items)

Shipping containers received intact Circle Applicable: seals broken damaged container leaking container other (describe) and sealed?

Samples requiring cold Circle Coolant # ice bags blue ice dry ice ( ) other describe) 2 preservation within (4 +/- 2 C)?

Record preservation method. __ _ __ _ _ _

Chain of custody documents included with shipment?

4 Sample containers intact and Circle Applicable: seals broken damaged container leaking container other (describe) sealed?

5 Samples requiring chemical Sample ID's, containers affected and observed pH:

preservation at proper pH?

Sample ID's and containers affected:

6 VOA vials free of headspace

_ (defined as < 6amm bubble)? ell Are Encore containers present?

7 (If yes, immediately deliver to VOA laboratory) 8 Samples received within holding Id's and tests affected:

time?

9 Sample ID's on COC match ID's Sample ID's and containers affected:

on bottles?

Sample ID's affected:

10 Date & time on COC match date

& time on bottles?

Number of containers received Sample ID's affected:

match number indicated on COC?

12 COC form is properly signed in relinquished/received sections?.1..,_..__._._..._ _ l 14 Air Bill ,Tracking #'s, &

Additional Comments . y. * :-

I~

RSO RAD Receipt #__

Suspected Hazard Information 8 *If > x2 area background is observed on samples identified as "noný

  • " regulated/non-radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety group for further

__ investigation.

A RadiologicalClassiication? Maximum Counts Observed*:

BPCB Regulae? Comments:

Shipped a DOT*Hazardous C Material? If yes, contact Waste e Hazard Class Shipped:

Manager or ESH Manager. UN#:

PM (or PMA) review of Hazard classification: Initials Date:

7

Connecticut Yankee Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Services . CY-ISC-SOW-O00 Figure 1. Sample Check-in List, Date/Time Received: S.q\

SDG#:. s-073t Work Order Number:

Shipping Cclhtainer ID1I*9 L D *l 3 - Chain of Custody'#. .UtI- ,

1. Custody Seals oi shipping container intact?."

-Yes N4 [J No

2. Custody Seals dated and signed?

Yes /3 No []

3. Chain-of-Custody record present?

Yes (4 No [ ]

.4. Cooler temperature (2.

5. Vermiculite/packing materials is:

" Wetx t Dry j 1] IVA 6.:" Number of sampleS in shipping container

"

7. Sample holding times ex&eeded?

Yes [ No Were any anomalies identified in ,sample receipt? Yes yO

] 1. "Description of anomalies,(include sample numbers):

8

RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS 9

Radiochemistry Case Narrative Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co. (YANK)

Work Order 163626 Method/Analysis Information Product: Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 533456 Prep Bitch Number: 533364 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 533363 Sample ID Client ID 163626016 9106-0007-001F 163626017 9106-0007-002F 1201101075 Method Blank (MB) 1201101076 163629001 (9508-0000-003C) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201101077 163629001(9508-0000-003C) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201101078 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

10

Quality Control (Q0 Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Sample 1201101076 (9508-0000-003C) was recounted due to a negative result greater than three times the error.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information

.1

Product: Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Pu- I1-RC Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 533457 Prep Batch Number: 533364 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 533363 Sample ID Client ID 163626016 9106-0007-001F 163626017 9106-0007-002F 1201101079 Method Blank (MB) 1201101080 163629001(9508-0000-003C) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201101081 163629001(9508-0000-003C) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201101082 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (0C0 Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

12

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Pu- 11-RC Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 537066 Prep Batch Number: 533364 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 533363 13

Sample ID Client ID 163626016 9106-0007-OO1F 163626017 9106-0007-002F 1201109335 Method Blank (MB) 1201109336 163626016(9106-0007-001F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201109337 163626016(9106-0007-OO1F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201109338 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-035 REV# 8.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163626016 (9106-0007-001F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from 14

referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Analytical Method: EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 533723 Prep Batch Number: 533363 Sample ID Client ID 163626001 9106-0007-016F 163626002 9106-0007-017F 163626003 9106-0007-003F 163626004 9106-0007-004F 163626005 9106-0007-004FS 163626006 9106-0007-005F 163626007 9106-0007-006F 163626008 9106-0007-007F 163626009 9106-0007-008F 163626010 9106-0007-01 IF 163626011 9106-0007-012F 163626012 9106-0007-013F 163626013 9106-0007-013FS 163626014 9106-0007-014F 163626015 9106-0007-015F 163626016 9106-0007-OO1F 163626017 9106-0007-002F 1201101711 Method Blank (MB) 1201101712 163626001(9106-0007-016F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201101713 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 15

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-0 13 REV# 11.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QCQ Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163626001 (9106-0007-016F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Additional Comments The relative percent difference between samples 1201101712 (9106-0007-016F) and 163626001 (9106-0007-016F) for Am-241 did not meet the duplication criteria. However, when a relative error ratio is calculated, precision is shown at 1.05293.

16

Qualifier information Qualifier Reason Analyte Sample Data rejected due to high Full-Width U1 Manganese-54 163626007 Half-Maximum.

163626012 UI Data rejected due to high counting uncertainty. Bismuth-212 163626015 UI Data rejected due to interference. Europium- 155 163626009 UI Data rejected due to low abundance. Cesium- 134 163626001 163626003 163626005 163626010 163626012 163626013 Lead-212 1201101711 Potassium-40 1201101711 Method/Analysis Information Product: GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: EPA 905.0 Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 536335 Prep Batch Number: 533364 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 533363 17

Sample ID Client ID 163626001 9106-0007-016F 163626002 9106-0007-017F 163626003 9106-0007-003F 163626004 9106-0007-004F 163626005 9106-0007-004FS 163626006 9106-0007-005F 163626007 9106-0007-006F 163626008 9106-0007-007F 163626009 9106-0007-008F 163626010 9106-0007-01 1F 163626011 9106-0007-012F 163626012 9106-0007-013F 163626013 9106-0007-013FS 163626014 9106-0007-014F 163626015 9106-0007-015F 163626016 9106-0007-00IF 163626017 9106-0007-002F 1201107674 Method Blank (MB) 1201107675 163105017(9106-0010-008F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201107676 163105017(9106-0010-008F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201107677 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-004 REV# 10.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QCQ Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163105017 (9106-0010-008F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

18

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Chemical Recoveries All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analytical Batch Number: 533813 Sample ID Client ID 163626016 9106-0007-001F 163626017 9106-0007-002F 1201101894 Method Blank (MB) 1201101895 163629001 (9508-0000-003C) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201101896 163629001(9508-0000-003C) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201101897 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this 19

narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-005 REV# 13.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (Q0 Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information 20

Product: Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Fe-1, Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 533888 Prep Batch Number: 533364 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 533363 Sample ID Client ID 163626016 9106-0007-00IF 163626017 9106-0007-002F 1201102097 Method Blank (MB) 1201102098 163629001(9508-0000-003C) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201102099 163629001 (9508-0000-003C) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201102100 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-040 REV# 3.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

21

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Ni-1, Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 533889 Prep Batch Number: 533364 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 533363 Sample ID Client ID 163626016 9106-0007-001F 163626017 9106-0007-002F 1201102101 Method Blank (MB) 1201102102 163629001 (9508-0000-003C) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201102103 163629001(9508-0000-003C) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201102104 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 22

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-022 REV# 8.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

23

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid-HTD2,ALL FSS Analytical Method: EPA 906.0 Modified Analytical Batch Number: 535984 Sample ID Client ID 163626016 9106-0007-001F 163626017 9106-0007-002F 1201106885 Method Blank (MB) 1201106886 163626016(9106-0007-001 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201106887 163626016(9106-0007-OOF) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201106888 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-002 REV# 12.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163626016 (9106-0007-001F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

24

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint C14, Solid AII,FSS Analytical Method: EPA EERF C-01 Modified Analytical Batch Number: 535068 Sample ID Client ID 163626016 9106-0007-OO1F 163626017 9106-0007-002F 1201104921 Method Blank (MB) 1201104922 163629001(9508-0000-003C) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201104923 163629001(9508-0000-003C) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201104924 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-003 REV# 8.

25

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 163629001 (9508-0000-003C).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples were reprepped due to low/high recovery.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all 26

of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.

Review Validation:

GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.

The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:

Reviewer/Date:

27

SAMPLE DATA

SUMMARY

28

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report for YANKOO Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.

Client SDG: MRS#06-0730 GEL Work Order: 163626 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
    • Analyte is a surrogate compound U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification ND The analyte concentration is not detected above the reporting limit.

The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis except where prohibited by the analytical procedure.

Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.

This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with General Engineering Laboratories, LLC standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Cheryl Jones.

Reviewed by 29

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-016F Project: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626001 Client ID: YANK001 Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 10-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 50.3%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSSGAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.835 +/-0.226 0.0845 +/-0.226 0.177 pCi/g MJH1 06/13/06 1208 533723 1 Americium-24 I 0.0575 +/-0.039 0.0234 +/-0.039 0.048 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.419 +/-0.398 0.173 +/-0.398 0.362 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.508 +/-0.117 0.0402 +/-0.117 0.0838 pCi/g Cesium-134 UI 0.00 +/-0.0567 0.0287 +/-0.0567 0.0599 pCi/g Cesium-137 0.369 +/-0.0742 0.0229 +/-0.0742 0.0479 pCi/g Cobalt-60 0.841 +/-0.102 0.0233 +/-0.102 0.0497 pCi/g Europium-152 U -0.0337 +/-0.0605 0.0488 +/-0.0605 0.101 pCi/g Europium-154 U 0.00645 +/-0.0752 0.0618 +/-0.0752 0.132 pCi/g Europium-155 U 0.0654 +/-0.0538 0.0443 +/-0.0538 0.0908 pCi/g Lead-212 0.788 +/-0.114 0.0262 +/-0.114 0.054 pCi/g Lead-214 0.631 +/-0.123 0.0356 +/-0.123 0.0738 pCi/g Manganese-54 U 0.0216 +/-0.0305 0.0203 +/-0.0305 0.0428 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.00105 +/-0.0268 0.0214 +/-0.0268 0.0446 pCi/g Potassium-40 12.7 +/-1.15 0.181 +/-1.15 0.395 pCi/g Radium-226 0.508 +/-0.117 0.0402 +/-0.117 0.0838 pCi/g Silver-108m U-0 1.000967 +/-0.0222 0.0181 +/-0.0222 0.0376 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.292 +/-0.0605 0.0201 +/-0.0605 0.0421 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,Sr9O, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U 0.00944 +/-0.0187 0.0199 +/-0.0187 0.043 pCi/g BXF1 06/10/06 1907 536335 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXMI 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits 30

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-016F Project: YANK0 1204 Sample ID: 163626001 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 69 (25%-125%)

Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

31

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 lnjun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-017F Prolect: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626002 Client ID: YANK001 Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 1 I-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 42.3%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.707 +/-0.240 0.108 +/-0.240 0.224 pCi/g MJHI 06/13/06 1209 533723 1 Americium-241 U 0.118 +/-0.125 0.0872 +/-0.125 0.179 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.599 +/-0.357 0.204 +/-0.357 0.426 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.623 +/-0.101 0.0492 +/-0.101 0.102 pCi/g Cesium-134 U 0.0262 +/-0.0364 0.0316 +/-0.0364 0.0657 pCi/g Cesium- 137 0.642 +/-0.0829 0.0246 +/-0.0829 0.0514 pCi/g Cobalt-60 3.09 +/-0.135 0.0239 +/-0.135 0.0514 pCi/g Europium-152 U -0.0711 +/-0.0728 0.0577 +/-0.0728 0.120 pCi/g Europium-154 U 0.00147 +/-0.080 0.0681 +/-0.080 0.146 pCi/g Europium-155 U 0.0641 +/-0.0627 0.0572 +/-0.0627 0.117 pCi/g Lead-212 0.921 +/-0.0927 0.039 +/-0.0927 0.0799 pCi/g Lead-214 0.750 +/-0.110 0.0435 +/-0.110 0.090 pCi/g Manganese-54 U 0.00873 +/-0.033 0.0279 +/-0.033 0.0583 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.0207 +/-0.027 0.0237 +/-0.027 0.0493 pCi/g Potassium-40 14.9 +1-1.05 0.183 +1- 1.05 0.401 pCi/g Radium-226 0.623 +/-0.101 0.0492 +/-0.101 0.102 pCi/g Silver-108m U -0.0164 +/-0.0269 0.0213 +/-0.0269 0.0441 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.311 +/-0.064 0.0233 +/-0.064 0.0486 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,SO9O, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U 0.00894 +/-0.0191 0.0203 +/-0.0191 0.0449 pCi/g BXF1 06/10/06 1908 536335 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXM1 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits CarrierFlracer Recovery GFP(C,Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 67 (25%-125%)

32

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-017F Project: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626002 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

33

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-003F Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626003 Client ID: YANK001 Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 08-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 22.5%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 2.64 +/-0.330 0.0998 +/-0.330 0.206 pCi/g MJHI 06/13/06 1209 533723 1 Americium-241 U -0.0716 +/-0.144 0.0961 +/-0.144 0.195 pCi/g Bismuth-212 1.51 +/-0.507 0.209 +/-0.507 0.430 pCi/g Bismuth-214 1.98 +/-0.159 0.048 +/-0.159 0.0985 pCi/g Cesium-134 UI 0.00 +/-0.0662 0.037 +/-0.0662 0.0759 pCi/g Cesium-137 0.198 +/-0.0554 0.0275 +1-0.0554 0.0566 pCi/g Cobalt-60 U -0.0189 +/-0.0381 0.0301 +/-0.0381 0.0628 pCi/g Europium-152 U - 0.00194 +/-0.0861 0.0672 +/-0.0861 0.137 pCi/g Europium-154 U-0 '.000908 +/-0.114 0.0924 +/-0.114 0.192 pCi/g Europium-155 U 0.108 +/-0.0935 0.0676 +/-0.0935 0.137 pCi/g Lead-212 2.59 +/-0.108 0.0369 +/-0.108 0.0751 pCi/g Lead-214 2.19 +/-0.158 0.0463 +/-0.158 0.0947 pCi/g Manganese-54 U 0.00325 +/-0.0385 0.0307 +/-0.0385 0.0632 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.0416 +/-0.0317 0.0265 +/-0.0317 0.0543 pCi/g Potassium-40 45.5 +/-1.55 0.268 +/-1.55 0.563 pCi/g Radium-226 1.98 +/-0.159 0.048 +/-0.159 0.0985 pCi/g Silver-108m U -0.0245 +/-0.029 0.0218 +/-0.029 0.0448 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.818 +/-0.0898 0.0257 +/-0.0898 0.0528 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,Sr90, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U 0.0112 +/-0.0204 0.0207 +/-0.0204 0.0472 pCi/g BXF1 06/10/06 1908 536335 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXMI 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description 1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 53 (25%-125%)

34

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-003F Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626003 Client ID: YANKOO Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
  • Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

35

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-004F Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626004 Client ID: YANK001 Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 08-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 34.5%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis GammaSolid-FSSGAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.631 +/-0.196 0.0799 +/-0.196 0.171 pCi/g MJH1 06/13/06 1209 533723 1 Americium-241 U -0.0157 +/-0.105 0.0805 +/-0.105 0.167 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.498 +/-0.396 0.139 +/-0.396 0.302 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.612 +/-0.116 0.0378 +/-0.116 0.0805 pCi/g Cesium- 134 U 0.0317 +/-0.0436 0.0248 +/-0.0436 0.0529 pCi/g Cesium-137 U 0.00966 +/-0.0263 0.0223 +/-0.0263 0.0475 pCi/g Cobalt-60 U 0.0342 +/-0.0299 0.0278 +/-0.0299 0.0602 pCi/g Europium- 152 U -0.0527 +/-0.0584 0.0473 +/-0.0584 0.100 pCi/g Europium- 154 U 0.0021 +/-0.075 0.0628 +/-0.075 0.138 pCi/g Europium- 155 U 0.0781 +/-0.0889 0.055 +/-0.0889 0.114 pCi/g Lead-212 0.932 +/-0.0755 0.0294 +/-0.0755 0.0614 pCi/g Lead-214 0.863 +/-0.106 0.0358 +/-0.106 0.0755 pCi/g Manganese-54 U - 0.00164 +/-0.0274 0.0222 +/-0.0274 0.0476 pCi/g Niobium-94 U -0.0121 +/-0.0243 0.0192 +/-0.0243 0.041 pCi/g Potassium- 4 0 14.1 +/-1.12 0.143 +/-1.12 0.332 pCi/g Radium-226 0.612 +/-0.116 0.0378 +/-0.116 0.0805 pCi/g Silver-108m U - 0.00486 +/-0.0218 0.0182 +/-0.0218 0.0384 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.288 +/-0.0658 0.0185 +/-0.0658 0.0397 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,Sr9O, solid-ALL FSS Strontiurn-90 U - 0.00642 +/-0.0154 0.0193 +/-0.0154 0.0433 pCi/g BXF1 06/10/06 1908 536335 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXM 1 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description 1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 69 (25%-I125%/o) 36

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-004F Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626004 Client ID: YANKOO Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

37

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-004FS Project: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626005 Client ID: YANKOO Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 08-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 24.6%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.618 +/-0.136 0.0549 +/-0.136 0.117 pCi/g MJH1 06/13/06 1210 533723 1 Americium-241 U 0.0257 +/-0.0951 0.0642 +/-0.0951 0.132 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.638 +/-0.217 0.113 +/-0.217 0.241 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.641 +/-0.0891 0.0264 +/-0.0891 0.056 pCi/g Cesium-134 UI 0.00 +/-0.0336 0.0202 +/-0.0336 0.0426 pCi/g Cesium-137 U 0.00574 +/-0.0192 0.0165 +/-0.0192 0.0348 pCi/g Cobalt-60 0.0627 +/-0.0236 0.0125 +/-0.0236 0.0279 pCi/g Europium-152 U -0.0257 +/-0.0403 0.0345 +/-0.0403 0.0725 pCi/g Europium-154 U 0.0282 +/-0.0537 0.0475 +/-0.0537 0.103 pCi/g Europium- 155 U 0.0414 +/-0.048 0.0443 +/-0.048 0.0913 pCi/g Lead-212 0.735 +/-0.0525 0.0222 +/-0.0525 0.0459 pCi/g Lead-214 0.569 +/-0.0691 0.0261 +/-0.0691 0.0547 pCi/g Manganese-54 U 0.005 +/-0.0181 0.0161 +/-0.0181 0.0343 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.0128 +/-0.0164 0.0146 +/-0.0164 0.0307 pCi/g Potassium-40 11.3 +/-0.749 0.126 +/-0.749 0.281 pCi/g Radium-226 0.641 +/-0.0891 0.0264 +/-0.0891 0.056 pCi/g Silver-108m U - -0.00953 +/-0.0142 0.0118 +/-0.0142 0.025 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.240 +/-0.0421 0.0151 +/-0.0421 0.0318 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,SO9O, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U 0.00585 +/-0.0179 0.0192 +/-0.0179 0.0433 pCi/g BXFI 06/10/06 1908 536335 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXM I 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description 1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFP( ', Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 70 (25%-/125%)

38

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-004FS Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626005 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GCIMS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

39

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-005F Proiect: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626006 Client ID: YANKOO Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 08-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 33.2%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.590 +/-0.190 0.0606 +/-0.190 0.130 pCi/g MJHI 06/13/06 1210 533723 1 24 1 +/-0.111 +/-0.111 Americium- U -0.0361 0.089 0.184 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.307 +/-0.250 0.124 +/-0.250 0.263 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.518 +/-0.103 0.0317 +/-0.103 0.0668 pCi/g Cesium-134 U 0.0397 +/-0.0236 0.0224 +/-0.0236 0.0473 pCi/g Cesium-137 0.538 +/-0.0669 0.0179 +/-0.0669 0.0378 pCi/g Cobalt-60 0.190 +/-0.0523 0.0167 +/-0.0523 0.0366 pCi/g Europium-152 U 0.0162 +1-0.0505 0.045 +1-0.0505 0.0938 pCi/g Europium-154 U 0.0126 +/-0.0677 0.0572 +/-0.0677 0.123 pCi/g Europium-155 U 0.0553 +/-0.0657 0.0472 +/-0.0657 0.0974 pCi/g Lead-212 0.791 +/-0.0873 0.0253 +/-0.0873 0.0523 pCi/g Lead-214 0.577 +/-0.108 0.032 +/-0.108 0.0668 pCi/g Manganese-54 U 0.0244 +/-0.0226 0.0177 +/-0.0226 0.0377 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.00792 +/-0.0181 0.0155 +/-0.0181 0.0328 pCi/g Potassium-40 13.1 +/-1.18 0.133 +/-1.18 0.299 pCi/g Radium-226 0.518 +/-0.103 0.0317 +/-0.103 0.0668 pCi/g Silver-108rn U -0.00923 +/-0.0176 0.0147 +/-0.0176 0.0308 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.242 +/-0.0436 0.0165 +/-0.0436 0.035 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,Sr90, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 0.0404 +/-0.020 0.015 +/-0.020 0.0341 pCi/g BXF1 06/10/06 1908 536335 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXMI 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 85 (25,/.-125%)

40

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-005F Project: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626006 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

41

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-006F Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626007 Client ID: YANKOOI Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 08-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 27.3%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.767 +/-0.216 0.0568 +/-0.216 0.121 pCi/g MJHI1 06/13/06 1210 533723 1 Americium-241 U -0.00364 +/-0.128 0.0745 +/-0.128 0.153 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.570 +/-0.219 0.119 +/-0.219 0.253 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.478 +/-0.0846 0.0293 +/-0.0846 0.0615 pCi/g Cesium-134 U 0.0325 +/-0.0365 0.0219 +/-0.0365 0.0459 pCi/g Cesium-137 U 0.00632 +/-0.0195 0.017 +/-0.0195 0.0357 pCi/g Cobalt-60 U 0.00524 +/-0.0188 0.0164 +/-0.0188 0.0358 pCi/g 2 +/-0.0557 +/-0.0557 0.0844 pCi/g Europium-15 U -0.0493 0.0406 Europium-154 U -0.052 +/-0.0638 0.0502 +/-0.0638 0.108 pCi/g 1 +/-0.051 0.0456 +/-0.051 0.0936 pCi/g Europium- 55 U -0.00374 Lead-212 0.784 +/-0.0867 0.0241 +/-0.0867 0.0497 pCi/g Lead-214 0.657 +/-0.101 0.0306 +/-0.101 0.0636 pCi/g Manganese-54 UI 0.00 +/-0.0469 0.0146 +/-0.0469 0.0311 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.0143 +/-0.0185 0.0164 +/-0.0185 0.0344 pCi/g Potassium- 4 0 12.8 +/-1.21 0.143 +/-1.21 0.315 pCi/g Radium-226 0.478 +/-0.0846 0.0293 +/-0.0846 0.0615 pCi/g Silver-108m U -0.00174 +/-0.0158 0.0138 +/-0.0158 0.0289 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.257 +/-0.0487 0.0152 +/-0.0487 0.0321 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 90 Strontium- U 0.00721 +/-0.0154 0.0161 +/-0.0154 0.0364 pCi/g BXF1 06/10/06 1908 536335 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXM1 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits CarrierfTracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 80 (25%-125%)

42

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-006F Proiect: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626007 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

43

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.corn Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-007F Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626008 Client ID: YANKOOI Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 08-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 43.8%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.884 +/-0.194 0.0626 +/-0.194 0.135 pCi/g MJH1 06/13/06 1210 533723 1 Americium-241 U 0.0703 +/-0.106 0.0841 +/-0.106 0.173 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.466 +/-0.319 0.184 +/-0.319 0.388 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.649 +/-0.092 0.0393 +/-0.092 0.0827 pCi/g Cesium-134 U 0.0372 +/-0.038 0.0245 +/-0.038 0.0518 pCi/g Cesium-137 0.251 +/-0.0464 0.0207 +/-0.0464 0.0437 pCi/g Cobalt-60 0.431 +/-0.0711 0.021 +/-0.0711 0.0458 pCi/g Europium-152 U -0,0397 +/-0.0676 0.0541 +/-0.0676 0.113 pCi/g Europium- 154 U 0,0367 +/-0.0754 0.0648 +/-0.0754 0.140 pCi/g Europium-155 U 0,0143 +/-0.0675 0.0586 +/-0.0675 0.121 pCi/g Lead-212 0.873 +/-0.067 0.0309 +/-0.067 0.064 pCi/g Lead-214 0.675 +/-0.108 0.0375 +/-0.108 0.0783 pCi/g 4 +/-0.0272 0.0226 +/-0.0272 0.0478 pCi/g Manganese-5 U -0.00423 Niobium-94 U 0.0143 +/-0.0229 0.0202 +/-0.0229 0.0424 pCi/g Potassium-40 12.7 +/-0.999 0.177 +/-0.999 0.391 pCi/g Radium-226 0.649 +/-0.092 0.0393 +/-0.092 0.0827 pCi/g Silver-108m U -0.0201 +/-0.0223 0.0171 +/-0.0223 0.036 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.279 +/-0.058 0.0192 +/-0.058 0.0407 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,Sr9O, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U 0.00474 +/-0.0145 0.0156 +/-0.0145 0.0352 pCi/g BXFI 06/10/06 1908 536335 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXMI 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 85 (25%-/125%)

44

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-007F Project: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626008 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

45

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-008F Project: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626009 Client ID: YANKOO Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 09-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 55.7%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 1.04 +/-0.303 0.131 +/-0.303 0.272 pCi/g MJHI 06/13/06 1211 533723 1 Americium-241 U 0.0438 +1-0.0622 0.040 +/-0.0622 0.0815 pCi/g Bismuth-212 1.01 +/-0.559 0.272 +/-0.559 0.563 pCi/g Bismuth-214 1.01 +/-0.179 0.0642 +/-0.179 0.133 pCi/g Cesium-134 U 0.0785 +/-0.073 0.0403 +/-0.073 0.0834 pCi/g Cesium-137 0.221 +/-0.0726 0.0382 +/-0.0726 0.0789 pCi/g Cobalt-60 0.763 +/-0.112 0.0368 +/-0.112 0.0775 pCi/g Europium-152 U -0.101 +/-0.104 0.0808 +/-0.104 0.166 pCi/g 4 +/-0.125 +/-0.125 0.216 Europium-15 U -0.0218 0.103 pCi/g Europium-155 UI 0.00 +/-0.117 0.0688 +/-0.117 0.140 pCi/g Lead-212 1.25 +/-0.100 0.0426 +/-0.100 0.0874 pCi/g Lead-214 1.10 +/-0.149 0.0579 +/-0.149 0.119 pCi/g 4 +/-0.0479 +/-0.0479 Manganese-5 U 0.0494 0.0406 0.084 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.0301 +/-0.0395 0.0334 +/-0.0395 0.0689 pCi/g Potassium-40 16.8 +/-1.29 0.329 +/-1.29 0.695 pCi/g Radium-226 1.01 +/-0.179 0.0642 +/-0.179 0.133 pCi/g Silver-108m U -0.0405 +/-0.0358 0.0272 +/-0.0358 0.0562 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.309 +/-0.0928 0.0328 +/-0.0928 0.0679 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,SrOO, solid-ALL FSS 9 BXFI 06/11/06 0958 536335 2 Strontium- 0 U 0.0143 +/-0.0193 0.0193 +/-0.0193 0.0416 pCi/g The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXM I 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description 1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 70 (25%-125%)

46

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-008F Proiect: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626009 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

47

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-011F Proiect: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626010 Client ID: YANK001 Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 09-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 64.1%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.980 +/-0.238 0.0827 +/-0.238 0.174 pCi/g MJHl 06/13/06 1211 533723 1 Americium-241 U -0.0092 +/-0.0288 0.0218 +/-0.0288 0.0446 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.897 +/-0.380 0.161 +/-0.380 0.338 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.780 +/-0.130 0.0389 +/-0.130 0.0814 pCi/g Cesium-134 UI 0.00 +/-0.0444 0.0275 +/-0.0444 0.0575 pCi/g Cesium-137 0.226 +/-0.051 0.0229 +/-0.051 0.0479 pCi/g Cobalt-60 0.314 +/-0.0689 0.0215 +/-0.0689 0.0464 pCi/g Europiurn-152 U -0.0396 +/-0.0648 0.0491 +/-0.0648 0.102 pCi/g 4 +/-0.0857 0.0702 +/-0.0857 0.150 pCi/g Europium-15 U 0.0113 Europium-155 U 0.0384 +/-0.0644 0.038 +/-0.0644 0.0781 pCi/g Lead-212 1.05 +/-0.071 0.0262 +/-0.071 0.054 pCi/g Lead-214 0.771 +/-0.0946 0.0356 +/-0.0946 0.0739 pCi/g Manganese-54 U 0.0192 +/-0.0311 0.0256 +/-0.0311 0.0536 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.00809 +/-0.0265 0.0216 +/-0.0265 0.0451 pCi/g Potassium-40 16.3 +/-1.14 0.200 +/-1.14 0.435 pCi/g Radium-226 0.780 +/-0.130 0.0389 +/-0.130 0.0814 pCi/g Silver-108m U -0.0109 +/-0.0221 0.0178 +/-0.0221 0.0372 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.364 +/-0.0567 0.021 +/-0.0567 0.0439 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,SO9O, solid ALL FSS Strontium-90 U 0.00857 +/-0.0154 0.0155 +/-0.0154 0.034 pCi/g BXFI 06/11/06 0958 536335 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXM I 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 71 (25°/o-125%)

48

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www gel.corn Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-01IF Proiect: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626010 Client ID: YANKOOI Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

49

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.corn Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-012F Proiect: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626011 Client ID: YANK001 Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 09-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 43.6%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysi GammaSolid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 1.02 +/-0.238 0.0813 +/-0.238 0.175 pCi/g MJH1 06/13/06 1211 533723 1 Americium-2 4 1 U 0.00735 +/-0.0387 0.0312 +/-0.0387 0.0642 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.863 +/-0.403 0.186 +/-0.403 0.396 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.627 +/-0.100 0.0456 +/-0.100 0.0963 pCi/g Cesium-134 U 0.039 +/-0.0397 0.0277 +/-0.0397 0.059 pCi/g Cesium-137 U -0.0162 +/-0.0291 0.0232 +/-0.0291 0.0494 pCi/g Cobalt-60 U -0.0146 +/-0.0342 0.0273 +/-0.0342 0.0594 pCi/g Europium-152 U 0.0092 +/-0.0641 0.0564 +/-0.0641 0.118 pCi/g 4 +/-0.0895 +/-0.0895 Europium-15 U 0.0494 0.0792 0.171 pCi/g Europium-155 U 0.0287 +/-0.0562 0.0478 +/-0.0562 0.0988 pCi/g Lead-212 0.939 +/-0.0708 0.0286 +/-0.0708 0.0596 pCi/g Lead-214 0.667 +/-0.104 0.043 +/-0.104 0.0899 pCi/g Manganese-54 U 0.0457 +/-0.0402 0.0245 +/-0.0402 0.0524 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.00394 +/-0.0268 0.0226 +/-0.0268 0.0478 pCi/g Potassium- 4 0 13.0 +/-1.10 0.174 +/-1.10 0.396 pCi/g Radium-226 0.627 +/-0.100 0.0456 +/-0.100 0.0963 pCi/g Silver-108m U - -0.00372 +/-0.0226 0.0193 +/-0.0226 0.0406 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.339 +/-0.0515 0.0214 +/-0.0515 0.0455 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,SO9O, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U 0.00897 +1-0.0155 0.0156 +1-0.0155 0.0341 pCi/g BXF1 06/11/06 0958 536335 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXMI 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits 50

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-012F Proiect: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626011 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 73 (25%-/125%)

Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier

  • QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

51

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-013F Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626012 Client ID: YANKOOI Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 09-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 51.6%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 1.20 +1-0.154 0.0536 +1-0.154 0.112 pCi/g MJH1 06/13/06 1212 533723 1 Americium-241 U -0.104 +/-0.129 0.0864 +/-0.129 0.177 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.635 +/-0.276 0.117 +/-0.276 0.245 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.739 +/-0.0863 0.0295 +/-0.0863 0.0611 pCi/g Cesium-134 UI 0.00 +/-0.0504 0.0216 +/-0.0504 0.0448 pCi/g Cesium-137 U 0.0221 +/-0.025 0.0159 +/-0.025 0.0331 pCi/g Cobalt-60 U 0.0186 +/-0.0222 0.0188 +/-0.0222 0.0397 pCi/g Europium-152 U 0.0251 +1-0.051 0.0432 +/-0.051 0.0891 pCi/g Europium- 154 U -0.00197 +/-0.0604 0.0486 +/-0.0604 0.103 pCi/g 5 +/-0.0619 +/-0.0619 Europium- 15 U 0.0535 0.0519 0.106 pCi/g Lead-212 1.34 +/-0.0699 0.0239 +/-0.0699 0.0491 pCi/g Lead-214 0.886 +/-0.0877 0.0296 +/-0.0877 0.0612 pCi/g 4 +/-0.0288 +/-0.0288 Manganese-5 UI 0.00 0.0148 0.031 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.00336 +/-0.019 0.0152 +/-0.019 0.0316 pCi/g Potassium- 4 0 19.4 +/-0.858 0.138 +/-0.858 0.295 pCi/g Radium-226 0.739 +/-0.0863 0.0295 +/-0.0863 0.0611 pCi/g Silver-108m U 0.00287 +/-0.0166 0.0138 +/-0.0166 0.0285 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.361 +1-0.0505 0.0149 +1-0.0505 0.0309 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,Sr9O, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U -0.00981 +/-0.0115 0.014 +1-0.0115 0.0302 pCi/g BXF1 06/11/06 0958 536335 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXMI 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFP(C, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 89 (25%-/125%)

52

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.corn Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-013F Project: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626012 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

53

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.corn Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-013FS Project: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626013 Client ID: YANKOO Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 09-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 50%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 1.27 +/-0.224 0.053 +/-0.224 0.111 pCi/g MJH1 06/13/06 1212 533723 1 Arnericium-241 U -0.0439 +/-0.0734 0.0575 +/-0.0734 0.117 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.774 +/-0.308 0.134 +/-0.308 0.278 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.879 +/-0.126 0.0318 +/-0.126 0.0656 pCi/g Cesium-134 UI 0.00 +/-0.038 0.0203 +/-0.038 0.0421 pCi/g Cesium-137 U 0.0201 +/-0.0235 0.0174 +/-0.0235 0.036 pCi/g Cobalt-60 U 0M0127 +/-0.0228 0.0189 +/-0.0228 0.0397 pCi/g Europium-152 U 0.0136 +/-0.0499 0.0411 +/-0.0499 0.0846 pCi/g Europium-154 U -0.0126 +/-0.0608 0.0484 +/-0.0608 0.102 pCi/g Europium-155 U 0.0641 +/-0.0797 0.0477 +/-0.0797 0.0974 pCi/g Lead-212 1.24 +/-0.114 0.0245 +/-0.114 0.0503 pCi/g Lead-214 1.08 +/-0.127 0.0279 +/-0.127 0.0575 pCi/g Manganese-54 U - 0.00714 +/-0.0203 0.0165 +/-0.0203 0.0343 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.0106 +/-0.0178 0.0152 +/-0.0178 0.0314 pCi/g Potassium-40 20.6 +/-1.48 0.149 +/-1.48 0.316 pCi/g Radium-226 0.879 +/-0.126 0.0318 +/-0.126 0.0656 pCi/g Silver-108m U -0.0102 +/-0.0164 0.0129 +/-0.0164 0.0267 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.346 +/-0.0576 0.0146 +/-0.0576 0.0303 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,S90, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U 0.00291 +/-0.0102 0.0107 +/-0.0102 0.0235 pCi/g BXFI 06/11/06 0958 536335 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-02 I LXMI 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description 1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 95 (25%-/125%)

54

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-013FS Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626013 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

55

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-014F Proiect: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626014 Client ID: YANK001 Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 09-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 28.1%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.769 +/-0.266 0.0836 +/-0.266 0.178 pCi/g MJH1 06/13/06 1635 533723 1 Americium-241 U 0.0479 +/-0.0995 0.083 +/-0.0995 0.171 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.551 +/-0.290 0.179 +/-0.290 0.377 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.586 +/-0.116 0.0412 +/-0.116 0.0867 pCi/g Cesium-134 U 0.0372 +/-0.0649 0.0299 +/-0.0649 0.0628 pCi/g Cesium-137 0.394 +/-0.065 0.0221 +/-0.065 0.0468 pCi/g Cobalt-60 1.10 +/-0.112 0.0206 +/-0.112 0.0452 pCi/g Europium-152 U - -0.00198 +/-0.0654 0.0565 +/-0.0654 0.118 pCi/g Europium-154 U 0.0221 +/-0.0777 0.0676 +/-0.0777 0.146 pCi/g Europium-155 U 01.000647 +/-0.0675 0.0593 +/-0.0675 0.122 pCi/g Lead-212 0.800 +/-0.0939 0.0316 +/-0.0939 0.0655 pCi/g Lead-214 0.628 +/-0.111 0.0391 +/-0.111 0.0817 pCi/g Manganese-54 U 0.0207 +/-0.0294 0.026 +/-0.0294 0.0548 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.00979 +/-0.0231 0.0204 +/-0.0231 0.043 pCi/g Potassium-40 12.8 +/-1.24 0.179 +/- 1.24 0.399 pCi/g Radium-226 0.586 +/-0.116 0.0412 +/-0.116 0.0867 pCi/g Silver-108m U 0.00804 +/-0.0223 0.0193 +/-0.0223 0.0406 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.281 +/-0.0503 0.0215 +/-0.0503 0.0454 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,SO9O, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U 0.00392 +/-0.0116 0.012 +/-0.0116 0.0264 pCi/g BXF1 06/11/06 0958 536335 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXMI 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 85 (25%-125%)

56

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-014F Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626014 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

57

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.corn Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-015F Proiect: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626015 Client ID: YANKOO0 Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 16-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 36.5%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSSGAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.788 +/-0.176 0.0729 +/-0.176 0.157 pCi/g MJH1 06/13/06 1636 533723 1 4 +/-0.102 0.0866 +/-0.102 pCi/g Americium-2 1 U 0.0523 0.179 Bismuth-212 UI 0.00 +/-0.479 0.152 +/-0.479 0.325 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.653 +/-0.110 0.0365 +/-0.110 0.0775 pCi/g Cesium-134 U 0.047 +/-0.0502 0.0269 +/-0.0502 0.0569 pCi/g Cesium-137 U 0.0232 +/-0.0242 0.022 +/-0.0242 0.0467 pCi/g Cobalt-60 U 0.0135 +/-0.0248 0.0223 +/-0.0248 0.0488 pCi/g Europium-152 U 0.0495 +/-0.0675 0.0585 +/-0.0675 0.122 pCi/g 4 +/-0.0752 0.0625 +/-0.0752 pCi/g Europium-15 U -0.0173 0.136 Europium-155 U 0.0465 +/-0.0626 0.0574 +/-0.0626 0.118 pCi/g Lead-212 0.905 +/-0.0726 0.0323 +/-0.0726 0.0669 pCi/g Lead-214 0.710 +/-0.105 0.0382 +/-0.105 0.080 pCi/g 4 +/-0.025 0.020 +/-0.025 pCi/g Manganese-5 U -0.0127 0.0428 Niobium-94 U 0.0157 +/-0.0235 0.0208 +/-0.0235 0.044 pCi/g Potassium-40 14.1 +/-1.12 0.195 +/-1.12 0.433 pCi/g Radium-226 0.653 +/-0.110 0.0365 +/-0.110 0.0775 pCi/g Silver-108m U 0.00538 +/-0.0222 0.0185 +/-0.0222 0.0389 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.263 +/-0.0567 0.0201 +/-0.0567 0.0427 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC, Sr9O, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U 0.00739 +/-0.0113 0.0112 +/-0.0113 0.0245 pCi/g BXFI 06/11/06 0958 536335 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXMI 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 99 (25%-125%)

58

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-015F Proiect: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626015 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

59

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-00IF Proiect: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626016 Client ID: YANKOO Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 1 I-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 18.4%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU , MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Americium-241 U 0.105 +/-0.222 0.205 +/-0.223 0.494 pCi/g JAS1 05/30/06 1336 533456 1 Curium-242 U --0.0407 +/-0.0357 0.0865 +/-0.0361 0.265 pCi/g Curium-243/244 U --0.0163 +/-0.154 0.171 +/-0.154 0.427 pCi/g Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Plutonium-238 U --0.0216 +/-0.107 0.128 +/-0.107 0.347 pCi/g JAS1 05/30/06 1336 533457 2 Plutonium-239/240 U --0.0054 +1-0.105 0.115 +/-0.105 0.322 pCi/g Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS Plutonium-241 U 0.192 +/-7.77 6.51 +/-7.77 13.6 pCi/g MXA 06/16/06 2348 537066 3 1

Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.766 +/-0.197 0.0601 +/-0.197 0.130 pCi/g MJHI 06/13/06 1637 533723 4 Americium-241 U 0.087 +/-0.127 0.0939 +/-0.127 0.195 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.445 +/-0.359 0.132 +/-0.359 0.283 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.473 +/-0.0945 0.0325 +/-0.0945 0.069 pCi/g Cesium-134 U 0.0163 +/-0.0439 0.0219 +/-0.0439 0.0465 pCi/g Cesium-137 U 0.032 +/-0.0284 0.0168 +/-0.0284 0.0358 pCi/g Cobalt-60 U 0.0496 +/-0.0293 0.028 +/-0.0293 0.0596 pCi/g Europium-152 U 0.00115 +/-0.0488 0.0438 +/-0.0488 0.0921 pCi/g Europium-154 U -0.0451 +/-0.0627 0.0477 +/-0.0627 0.105 pCi/g Europium-155 U 0.054 +/-0.0643 0.0457 +/-0.0643 0.095 pCi/g Lead-212 0.686 +/-0.080 0.027 +/-0.080 0.0561 pCi/g Lead-214 0.548 +/-0.0972 0.028 +/-0.0972 0.0591 pCi/g Manganese-54 U 0.0154 +/-0.0242 0.0197 +/-0.0242 0.042 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.0131 +/-0.0187 0.0149 +/-0.0187 0.0319 pCi/g Potassium-40 12.5 +/-1.18 0.142 +/-1.18 0.322 pCi/g Radium-226 0.473 +/-0.0945 0.0325 +/-0.0945 0.069 pCi/g Silver-108m U -0.00363 +/-0.0156 0.0135 +/-0.0156 0.0288 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.198 +/-0.0462 0.0171 +/-0.0462 0.0363 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U 0.00558 +/-0.0136 0.0139 +/-0.0136 0.0308 pCi/g BXFI 06/11/06 0959 536335 5 Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid-HTD2,ALL FSS Tritium U 0.738 +/-6.97 5.81 +/-6.97 12.3 pCi/g NXPI 06/17/06 1537 535984 6 60

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www gel.corn Certificate of Analysis 1 I Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-001F Proiect: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626016 Client ID: YANKOOI Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis Liquid Scint C14, Solid All, FSS Carbon-14 U 0.0265 +/-0.0805 0.0671 +/-0.0805 0.136 pCi/g MXPI 06/04/06 1145 535068 7 Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Iron-55 U 2.53 +/-10.4 7.66 +/-10.4 16.1 pCi/g SLNI 06/01/06 2111 533888 9 Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Nickel-63 U -5.15 +/-7.12 6.09 +/-7.12 12.5 pCi/g SLNI 06/01/06 1503 533889 10 Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Technetium-99 U 0.0747 +/-0.244 0.202 +/-0.244 0.418 pCi/g SXEI 06/02/06 0833 533813 I1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXMI 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified 2 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-I I-RC Modified 3 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu- 11-RC Modified 4 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 5 EPA 905.0 Modified 6 EPA 906.0 Modified 7 EPA EERF C-01 Modified 8 EPA EERF C-01 Modified 9 DOE RESL Fe-I, Modified 10 DOE RESL Ni-i, Modified 11 DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Americium-243 Alphaspec Am24 1, Cm, Solid ALL 97 (15%-125%)

Plutonium-242 Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS 79 (15%-125%)

Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL Fý 100 (25%-.125%)

Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 72 (25%-6125%)

Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FS 84 (15%-125%)

Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FS 81 (25%-/125%)

61

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-001F Project: YANK01204 Sample ID: 163626016 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FS 80 (15%-/125%)

Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

62

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company : Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-002F Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626017 Client ID: YANKO01 Matrix: Soil Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 08-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 27.3%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Alphaspec Am241, Cm, SolidALL FSS Americitim-241 U - -0.0232 +/-0.151 0.170 +/-0.151 0.429 pCi/g JAS1 05/30/06 1336 533456 1 Curium-242 U - -0.0517 +/-0.0414 0.100 +/-0.0419 0.298 pCi/g Curium-243/244 U -0 ).00261 +/-0.143 0.154 +/-0.143 0.396 pCi/g Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Plutonium-238 U 0.0604 +/-0.120 0.0936 +/-0.120 0.266 pCi/g JAS1 05/30/06 1336 533457 2 Plutonium-239/240 U - 0.0255 +/-0.0933 0.115 +/-0.0933 0.308 pCi/g Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS Plutonium-241 U 3.02 +/-8.03 6.61 +/-8.04 13.8 pCi/g MXA 06/17/06 0004 537066 3 I

Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSSGAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.781 +/-0.196 0.0599 +/-0.196 0.130 pCi/g MJH1 06/13/06 1637 533723 4 Americium-241 U - -0.0559 +/-0.102 0.0905 +/-0.102 0.186 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.507 +/-0.264 0.150 +/-0.264 0.319 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.497 +/-0.119 0.0349 +/-0.119 0.0739 pCi/g Cesium-134 U 0.0202 +/-0.0251 0.0224 +/-0.0251 0.0479 pCi/g Cesium-137 0.441 +/-0.0577 0.0211 +/-0.0577 0.0446 pCi/g Cobalt-60 U 0.0279 +/-0.0691 0.0214 +/-0.0691 0.047 pCi/g Europium-152 U - 0.0326 +/-0.0579 0.0495 +/-0.0579 0.104 pCi/g 4 +/-0.0845 0.0573 +/-0.0845 0.126 pCi/g Europium-15 U - 0.0353 Europium-155 U - 0.0427 +/-0.0652 0.0562 +/-0.0652 0.116 pCi/g Lead-212 0.668 +/-0.0871 0.0303 +/-0.0871 0.0627 pCi/g Lead-214 0.578 +/-0.100 0.0352 +/-0.100 0.0737 pCi/g Manganese-54 U C.00498 +/-0.0234 0.020 +/-0.0234 0.0427 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.'000943 +/-0.0215 0.0183 +/-0.0215 0.0388 pCi/g Potassium-40 11.4 +/-1.21 0.176 +/-1.21 0.394 pCi/g Radium-226 0.497 +/-0.119 0.0349 +/-0.119 0.0739 pCi/g Silver-108m U -0 .00345 +/-0.0196 0.0169 +/-0.0196 0.0356 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.196 +/-0.0492 0.0177 +/-0.0492 0.0377 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,S 9 0 , solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U 0.00343 +/-0.0162 0.017 +/-0.0162 0.0379 pCi/g BXF1 06/11/06 1048 536335 5 Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid-HTD2,ALL FSS Tritium U -1.68 +/-6.61 5.64 +/-6.61 11.9 pCi/g NXPI 06/17/06 1553 535984 6 63

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis of Analvsis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-002F Proiect: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626017 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis Liquid Scint C14, SolidAlFSS Carbon-14 U 0.0916 +/-0.0825 0.0677 +/-0.0825 0.138 pCi/g MXP1 06/04/06 1319 535068 7 Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Iron-55 U -1.08 +/-9.72 7.31 +/-9.72 15.4 pCi/g SLNI 06/01/06 2128 533888 9 Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Nickel-63 U -0.355 +/-8.33 7.00 +/-8.33 14.3 pCi/g SLNI 06/01/06 1535 533889 10 LiquidScint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Technetium-99 U -0.174 +/-0.222 0.192 +/-0.222 0.396 pCi/g SXEI 06/02/06 0849 533813 11 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXMI 05/25/06 1129 533363 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified 2 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-I 1-RC Modified 3 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-I I-RC Modified 4 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 5 EPA 905.0 Modified 6 EPA 906.0 Modified 7 EPA EERF C-01 Modified 8 EPA EERF C-01 Modified 9 DOE RESL Fe-I, Modified 10 DOE RESL Ni-I, Modified 11 DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Americium-243 Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL 98 (15%-125%)

Plutonium-242 Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS 96 (15%-125%)

Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FS 99 (25%-/125%)

Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 52 (25%- 125%)

Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FS 86 (15%-125%)

Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FS 78 (25%-125%)

64

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: June 22, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-002F Proiect: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 163626017 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FS 84 (15%- 125%)

Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

65

I.

QUALITY CONTROL DATA 66

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Report Date: June 22, 2006 Client : Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Page 1 of 9 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hamnpton, Connecticut Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Workorder: 163626 Parmname NOM Samnle Oual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Alpha Spec Batch 533456 QC1201101076 163629001 DUP Americium-24 I U 0.157 U -0.115 pCi/g 1300 (0%- 100%) JASI 06/01/06 07:40 Uncert: +/-0.195 +/-0.0601 TPU: +/-0.196 +/-0.0618 Curium-242 U 0.0192 U -0.0484 pCilg 463 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0766 +/-0.074 TPU: +/-0.0767 +/-0.0742 Curium-243/244 U -0.0548 U -0.0779 pCi/g 35 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.139 +/-0.0968 TPU: +/-0.139 +/-0.0973 QCI201101078 LCS Americium-241 12.8 13.1 pCi/g 102 (75%-125%) 05/30/06 13:36 Uncert: +/-1.26 TPU: +/-2.27 Curium-242 U -0.0903 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0864 TPU: +/-0.0874 Curium-243/244 15.6 15.3 pCi/g 98 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-1.37 TPU: +/-2.60 QC1201101075 MB Americium-241 U 0.0762 pCi/g 05/30/06 13:36 Uncert: +/-0.149 TPU: +1-0.150 Curium-242 U 0.00978 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0741 TPU: +/-0.0741 Curium-243/244 U -0.0358 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.154 TPU: +/-0.154 Americium-24 I 12.8 U 0.157 13.5 pCi/g 105 (75%-125%) 05/30/06 13:36 Uncert: +/-0.195 +/-1.23 TPU: +/-0.196 +/-2.28 Curium-242 U 0.0192 U -0.0134 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0766 +/-0.0694 TPU: +/-0.0767 +/-0.0694 Curium-243/244 15.6 U -0.0548 15.2 pCilg 97 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.139 +/-1.31 TPU: +/-0.139 +/-2.52 Batch 533457 QC1201101080 163629001 DUP Plutonium-238 U -0.0306 U -0.00654 pCi/g 130 (0% - 100%) JASI 05/30/06 13:36 67

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 163626 Page 2 of 9 Parmname NOM Sample Oual OC Units RPD% REC% Ranize Anist Date Time Rad Alpha Spec Batch 533457 Uncert: +/-0.0787 +/-0.0727 TPU: +/-0.0788 +/-0.0727 Plutonium-239/240 U -0.00664 U 0.0366 pCi/g 289 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0739 +/-0.139 TPU: +/-0.0739 +/-0.139 QC1201101082 LCS Plutonium-238 U 0.193 pCi/g (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.184 TPU: +/-0.185 Plutonium-239/240 11.8 11.7 pCi/g 99 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-1.17 TPU: +/-1.68 QC1201101079 MB Plutonium-238 U -0.00254 pCi/g 05/30/06 13:36 Uncert: +/-0.139 TPU: +/-0.139 Plutonium-239/240 U -0.0661 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.107 TPU: +/-0.108 QC1201101081 163629001 MS Plutonium-238 u -0.0306 U 0.0997 pCi/g (75%-1 25%) 05/30/06 13:36 Uncert: +/-0.0787 +/-0.145 TPU: +/-0.0788 +/-0.145 Plutonium-239/240 11.8 U -0.00664 12.3 pCi/g 104 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.0739 +/-1.30 TPU: +/-0.0739 +/-1.86 Batch 537066 QC1201109336 163626016 DUP Plutonium-241 U 0.192 U 3.37 pCi/g (0%- 100%) AXAI 06/17/06 00:37 Uncert: +/-7.77 +/-8.34 TPU: +/-7.77 +/-8.35 QC1201109338 LCS Plutonium-241 141 143 pCi/g 101 (75%-125%) 06/17/06 01:09 Uncert: +/-14.7 TPU: +/-20.1 QC1201109335 MB Plutonium-241 U -0.477 pCi/g 06/17/06 00:20 Uncert: +/-8.24 TPU: +/-8.24 QC1201109337 163626016 MS Plutonium-241 143 U 0.192 133 pCi/g 93 (75%-125%) 06/17/06 00:53 Uncert: +/-7.77 +/-13.5 TPU: +/-7.77 +/-18.8 Rad Gamma Spec Batch 533723 QC1201101712 163626001 DUP Actinium-228 0.835 0.800 pCi/g 4 (0%- 100%) MJHI 06/13/06 20:19 Uncert: +/-0.226 +/-0.171

+/-0.171 68

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 163626 Page 3 of 9 Parmname NOM Sample Qual OC Units RPD% REC% Ran2e Anist Date Time Rad Gamma Spec Batch 533723 TPU: +/-0.226 Americium-241 0.0575 U -0.00911 pCi/g 275 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.039 +/-0.118 TPU: +/-0.039 +/-0.118 Bismuth-212 0.419 0.461 pCi/g 9 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.398 +/-0.271 TPU: +/-0.398 +/-0.271 Bismuth-214 0.508 0.485 pCi/g 5 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.117 +/-0.099 TPU: +/-0.117 +/-0.099 Cesium- 134 uI 0.00 U 0.0418 pCi/g 58 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0567 +/-0.0241 TPU: +/-0.0567 +/-0.0241 Cesium-137 0.369 0.363 pCi/g 2 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0742 +/-0.0442 TPU: +/-0.0742 +/-0.0442 Cobalt-60 0.841 0.855 pCi/g 2 (0%- 20%)

Uncert: +/-0.102 +/-0.0728 TPU: +/-0.102 +/-0.0728 Europium- 152 U -0.0337 U 0.0532 pCi/g 890 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0605 +/-0.0536 TPU: +/-0.0605 +/-0.0536 Europium- 154 U 0.00645 U -0.00621 pCi/g 10400 (0% - 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0752 +/-0.0663 TPU: +/-0.0752 +/-0.0663 Europium-155 U 0.0654 U 0.0635 pCi/g 3 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0538 +/-0.096 TPU: +/-0.0538 +/-0.096 Lead-212 0.788 0.888 pCi/g 12 (0%- 20%)

Uncert: +/-0.114 +/-0.0657 TPU: +/-0.114 +/-0.0657 Lead-214 0.631 0.680 pCi/g 7 (0%- 20%)

Uncert: +/-0.123 +/-0.100 TPU: +/-0.123 +/-0.100 Manganese-54 U 0.0216 U 0.0236 pCi/g 9 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0305 +/-0.0287 TPU: +/-0.0305 +/-0.0287 Niobium-94 U 0.00105 U 0.00844 pCi/g 156 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0268 +/-0.0197 TPU: +/-0.0268 +/-0.0197 Potassium-40 12.7 13.6 pCi/g 7 (0%- 20%)

Uncert: +/-1.15 +/-0.821 TPU: +/-1.15 +/-0.821 Radium-226 0.508 0.485 pCi/g 5 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.117 +/-0.099 TPU: +/-0.117 +/-0.099 Silver- 108m U -0.000967 U -0.0129 pCi/g 172 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0222 +/-0.0181 69

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 163626 Page 4 of 9 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Gamma Spec Batch 533723 TPU: +/-0.0222 +/-0.0181 Thallium-208 0.292 0.285 pCi/g 2 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0605 +/-0.050 TPU: +/-0.0605 +/-0.050 QC1201101713 LCS Actinium-228 U -0.023 pCi/g 06/13/06 16:39 Uncert: +/-0.393 TPU: +/-0.393 Americium-241 23.4 21.1 pCi/g 90 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.410 TPU: +/-0.410 Bismuth-212 U 0.483 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.736 TPU: +/-0.736 Bismuth-214 U 0.183 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.174 TPU: +/-0.174 Cesium- 134 U -0.0114 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.111 TPU: +/-0.111 Cesium-137 9.63 9.96 pCi/g 103 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.321 TPU: +/-0.321 Cobalt-60 15.0 14.8 pCi/g 99 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.460 TPU: +/-0.460 Europium- 152 U 0.055 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.194 TPU: +/-0.194 Europium- 154 U -0.151 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.249 TPU: +/-0.249 Europium- 155 U -0.0725 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.184 TPU: +/-0.184 Lead-212 U -0.0158 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.111 TPU: +/-0.111 Lead-214 U 0.0652 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.143 TPU: +/-0.143 Manganese-54 U -0.00821 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.102 TPU: +/-0.102 Niobium-94 U 0.0375 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0904 TPU: +/-0.0904 Potassium-40 U 0.0833 pCi/g 70

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 163626 Page 5 of 9 Parmname NOM Sample Oual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Gamma Spec Batch 533723 Uncert: +/-1.32 TPU: +/-1.32 Radium-226 U 0.183 pCi/g (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.174 TPU: +/-0.174 Silver-108m U 0.041 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0769 TPU: +/-0.0769 Thallium-208 U 0.0122 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0908 TPU: +/-0.0908 QC1201101711 MB Actinium-228 U 0.00373 pCi/g 06/13/06 16:38 Uncert: +/-0.0488 TPU: +/-0.0488 Americium-241 U -0.0187 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0422 TPU: +/-0.0422 Bismuth-212 U 0.00218 pCi/g Uncert: +1-0.055 TPU: +/-0.055 Bismuth-214 U 0.0139 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0141 TPU: +/-0.0141 Cesium- 134 U 0.00605 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.00728 TPU: +/-0.00728 Cesium- 137 U 0.000483 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0136 TPU: +/-0.0136 Cobalt-60 U 0.00563 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0149 TPU: +/-0.0149 Europium- 152 U -0.0118 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0187 TPU: +/-0.0187 Europium- 154 U -0.00733 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0202 TPU: +/-0.0202 Europium- 155 U -0.00191 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.016 TPU: +/-0.016 Lead-212 UI 0.00 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0119 TPU: +/-0.0119 Lead-214 U 0.0045 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0243 TPU: +/-0.0243 71

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 163626 Page 6 of 9 Parmname NOM Sample Qual OC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Gamma Spec Batch 533723 Manganese-54 U -0.000719 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.00642 TPU: +/-0.00642 Niobium-94 U 0.00252 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.00643 TPU: +/-0.00643 Potassium-40 UI 0.00 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0857 TPU: +/-0.0857 Radium-226 U 0.0139 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0141 TPU: +/-0.0141 Silver- 108m U -0.00171 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.00588 TPU: +/-0.00588 Thallium-208 U 0.0103 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.00726 TPU: +/-0.00726 Rad Gas Flow Batch 536335 QC1201107675 163105017 DUP Strontium-90 U -0.00194 U -0.015 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) BXF1 06/11/06 10:58 Uncert: +1-0.0174 +/-0.0182 TPU: +/-0.0174 +/-0.0182 QC0201107677 LCS Strontium-90 1.48 1.56 pCi/g 105 (75%-125%) 06/11/06 10:59 Uncert: +/-0.0872 TPU: +/-0.099 QC1201107674 MB Strontium-90 U -0.00598 PC ilg 06/11/06 10:58 Uncert: +/-0.0102 TPU: +/-0.0102 QC1201107676 163105017 MS Strontium-90 1.57 U -0.00194 1.62 PCilg 104 (75%-125%) 06/11/06 10:59 Uncert: +/-0.0174 +/-0.103 TPU: +/-0.0174 +/-0.114 Rad Liquid Scintillation Batch 533813 QC1201101895 163629001 DUP Technetium-99 U -0.0294 U 0.0716 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) SXE I 06/02/06 09:38 Uncert: +/-0.213 +/-0.234 TPU: +/-0.213 +/-0.234 QCI201101897 LCS Technetium-99 12.7 10.7 pCi/g 85 (75%-125%) 06/02/06 10:11 Uncert: +/-0.440 TPU: +/-0.515 QC1201101894 MB Technetium-99 U 0.0481 pCi/g 06/02/06 09:22 72

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.corn QC Summary Workorder: 163626 Page 7 of 9 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range AnIst Date Time Rad Liquid Scintillation Batch 533813 Uncert: +/-0.208 TPU: +/-0.208 QC1201101896 163629001 MS Technetium-99 12.7 U -0.0294 10.4 pCi/g 82 (75%-125%) 06/02/06 09:55 Uncert: +/-0.213 +/-0.494 TPU: +/-0.213 +/-0.560 Batch 533888 QC1201102098 163629001 DUP lron-55 U 9.50 U -0.655 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) SLNI 06/01/06 22:17 Uncert: +/-25.2 +/-10.3 TPU: +/-25.2 +/-10.3 QC1201102100 LCS Iron-55 360 406 pCilg 113 (75%-125%) 06/01/06 22:49 Uncert: +/-33.4 TPU: +/-59.1 QC1201102097 MB Iron-55 U 7.50 PCilg 06/01/06 22:00 Uncert: +/-15.0 TPU: +1-15.0 QC1201102099 163629001 MS Iron-55 605 U 9.50 569 pCilg 94 (75%-125%) 06/01/06 22:33 Uncert: +/-25.2 +/-35.2 TPU: +/-25.2 +/-66.9 Batch 533889 QC1201102102 163629001 DUP Nickel-63 U -1.07 U 0.0835 pCi/g 0 (0%- 100%) SLNI 06/01/06 17:10 Uncert: +/-6.29 +/-6.55 TPU: +/-6.29 +/-6.55 QC1201102104 LCS Nickel-63 491 386 pCi/g 79 (75%-125%) 06/01/06 18:13 Uncert: +/-13.2 TPU: +/-17.7 QC1201102101 MB Nickel-63 U -3.82 pCi/g 06/01/06 16:38 Uncert: +/-6.46 TPU: +/-6.46 QC1201102103 163629001 MS Nickel-63 597 U -1.07 477 pCi/g 80 (75%-125%) 06/01/06 17:42 Uncert: +/-6.29 +/-17.5 TPU: +/-6.29 +/-23.8 Batch 535068 QC1201104922 163629001 DUP Carbon- 14 U 0.0269 U 0.0256 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) vlXPI 06/04/06 20:43 Uncert: +/-0.0817 +/-0.0825 TPU: +/-0.0817 +/-0.0825 QC1201104924 LCS Carbon- 14 6.92 7.04 pCi/g 102 (75%-125%) 06/04/06 22:32 Uncert: +/-0.393 TPU: +/-0.408 73

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 163626 Page 8 of 9 Parmname NOM Samnle Oual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Liquid Scintillation Batch 535068 QC1201104921 MB Carbon- 14 U -0.0434 pCi/g 06/04/06 19:10 Uncert: +/-0.0781 TPU: +/-0.0781 QC1201104923 163629001 MS Carbon-14 12.4 U 0.0269 12.9 pCilg 104 (75%-125%) 06/04/06 22:15 Uncert: +/-0.0817 +/-0.703 TPU: +/-0.0817 +/-0.731 Batch 535984 QC1201106886 163626016 DUP Tritium U 0.738 U -1.57 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) NXP I 06/17/06 17:31 Uncert: +/-6.97 +/-7.27 TPU: +/-6.97 +/-7.27 QC1201106888 LCS Tritium 52.7 55.2 pCi/g 105 (75%-125%) 06/17/06 18:04 Uncert: +/-9.22 TPU: +/-9.27 QC1201106885 MB Tritium U -0.845 pCi/g 06/17/06 17:15 Uncert: +/-5.81 TPU: +/-5.81 QCI201106887 163626016 MS Tritium 53.0 U 0.738 44.6 pCi/g 84 (75%-125%) 06/17/06 17:47 Uncert: +/-6.97 +/-8.62 TPU: +/-6.97 +/-8.66 Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria Result is less than value reported Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL 74

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 163626 Page 9 of 9 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time A

h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more.

    • Indicates analyte is a surrogate compound.

A The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptence criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/- the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.

For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.

Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.

75

Table of Contents G eneral Narrative .................................................................. 1 Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation ........... 4 Radiological Analysis .......................................................... 9 Sample Data Summary ...................................................... 14 Q uality C ontrol D ata ........................................................... 24

General Narrative 1

CASE NARRATIVE For CONNECTICUT YANKEE RE: Soil PO# 002332 Work Order: 167554 SDG: MSR #06-1035 August 2, 2006 Laboratory Identification:

General Engineering Laboratories, LLC Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 30712 Charleston, South Carolina 29417 Express Mail Delivery and Shipping Address:

2040 Savage Road Charleston, South Carolina 29407 Telephone Number:

(843) 556-8171 Summary:

Sample receipt The sample(s) for this Project arrived at General Engineering Laboratories, LLC, (GEL) in Charleston, South Carolina on July 21, 2006. All sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. The chain of custody contained the proper documentation and signatures.

The laboratory received the following sample(s):

Sample ID Client Sample ID 167554001 9106-0007-018F 167554002 9106-0007-019F 167554003 9106-0007-020F 167554004 9106-0007-021F Items of Note:

There are no items of note.

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP,INC.

P.O. Box 30712 - Charleston, SC 29417 - 2040 Savage Road (29407)

Phone (843) 556-8171

  • Fa*83) 766-1178 - www.gel.com

Case Narrative:

Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) Standard Operating Procedures. Any technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are listed below by analytical parameter.

Analytical Request:

Four soil samples were analyzed for FSSGAM and Sr-90.

Internal Chain of Custody:

Custody was maintained for the sample(s).

Data Package:

The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation and all analytical fractions.

I certify that this data package is in compliance with the SOW, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hard copy data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or a designee, as verified by the following signature.

Cheryl Jones Project Manager GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.

P.O. Box 30712 . Charleston, SC 29417 - 2040 Savage Road (29407)

Phone (843) 556-8171 - FaYI843) 766-1178

  • www.gel.com

Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation 4

Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5104-003-Attachment B-CY-001 Major m075w54f/*

I.-

Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Chain of Custody Form No. 2006-00441 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556 Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning Analyses Requested Lab Use Only Contact Name & Phone: Comments:

Jack McCarthy 860-267-3924 Analytical Lab (Name, City, State)

General Engineering Laboratories 2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407 0 < ,

843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones C d) Z Priority:_L-3 D. X 14 D. El 7 D. Container Sample Size-Media Type &Type Sample Designation Date Time Code Code Code Comment, Preservation Lab Sample ID 9106-0007-018F 6-27-06 1,ý15" SE C BP 00f - _

u3fb2. 9106-0007-019F 6-27-06 1-3,i31 SE C BP X -

9106-0007-020F 6-27-06 J3,ý If' SE C BP ( _ ° 9106-0007-021F 6-27-06 1t3o SE C BP ), _ "

NOTES: PO 4: 002332 MSR #: 06-/O SSWP# NA SLTP QA Dl Radwaste QA [] Non QA Samples Shipped Via: Internal Container Z Fed Ex Temp.: 2_.Deg. C L] ups

[] Hand Custody Seale)d?

Y 0 N I) Relinq ed Date/Time 2) Received By DateiTim/e Custody Seal Intact?

E] Other 3),Relinquished By Date/Time 4) Rceivec}\y Date/Time YO NO]

&t~4:Am( *4, /44~ \~ uI

~ - Bill of Lading #

ENJ~ SAMPLE RECEIPT &RVIEWT FORM 01P47RW" P useonly Client (y~y~\Qj~. SDGARCOC/Work Order: (t1 'S Date Received: __ __ __ __ _ PM(A) Review ( ns-couftir are resolved prior to siping):

Received By: )7,/__ _.

Sample Receipt Criteria Comments/Qualifir (Required for Non-Conforming Items) leaking comainerethe (describe)

Shipping containers received intact and sealed? / .

Cicle Applicable: sals broken damaged oer rco li c rr Samples requiring cold Circl Coolant # ice bags blue ice dry ice odier describe) 2 preservation within (4 +/- 2 C)? /__ U-4__ ._ J

.

Record preservation method. '_.___

Chain of custody documents included with shipment? _

Sample containers intact and Circle Applicable: seals broken damaged eominer leaking contaier otder (describe) sealed? ___

Samples requiring chemical Sample 's.conuiaers affected ard ose pte preservation at proper pH?

VOA vials free of headspace Samnle ID's and comain affected:

(defined as < 6mm bubble)?

Are Encore containers present?

7 (If yes. immediately deliver to VOA laboratory)

Samples received within holding Id's and tes affecwd:

time? /

Sample ID's on COC match ID's sale ID's and containers affected: I on bottles? *, . \

  • _._ __.

Date & time on COC match date Sample ID's affected:

& time on bottles? _

Number of containers received Sample ID's affected:

match number indicated on COC?

COC form is properly signed in relinquished/received sections? I '_ __'

Air Bill ,Tracking #'s, &

14 Additional Comments

. RSO RAD Receipt_____ #______

Suspected Hazard~ Inomto *if> x2 area background is observed o~isaimles identifed as -non-Suspected Hazard Information

  • jregulatedlion-radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety group for further x 0:* investigation.

S diinlnaioal Cl rtin i I ..... . . . .. .. . . .

n = f-IIV I i .i i S~i l Z Ubserved=: f*,f)v'it'i U.n Obseved*

I

-.

f

_______________

'Ihipped as DO I Hazardous IB PCB Regulated?

CiMaterial? If yes, contact Waste

-Manager or ESH Manager.

PM (or PMA) review of Hazard classif;C26011: Inifials ate* 'Zf -r-PM(o PMA rvie-o'Haar clsi---n Iiil ( kl-,'1 fl2.... -t 'I'-T w I t:) V

SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM CONTINUATION FORM 3-1-z~o - 0 t*-ooW..#

4

- atL ID WýU- Fe-CLe14L-DVQ4 Maiý 41V~ Owq4 7

Connecticut Yankee

-CY-ISC-SOW-O-l Services Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Figure 1. Sample Check-in List.

(. .

Date-Ti m" ".R eceived: - - ..-

",.5I: 1 O*,-" iOg " .

SDG#:

_ ___ __ __ __ __ _ _ __ __ __

Work Order Number:__-___

k'I Shipping Cdhtaincr I D*Q(-,CCWAVS\2.Q< Chain of Custody # S~e ctb* I~i Oe-2+

1. Custody Seals on shipping container intact?:.. -Yes ( J No kf

-.Yes[ ].No [ ]./ .

2. Custody Seals dated and signed? .

Chain-of-Custody record present? Yesyf Not]

3.

4. Cooler temperature -2*Q (zY .r Vermiculite/packing materials is:

Wet ([ Dry t' -

5.

r3/4* S*;,A-- o 6.: Number of samples in shipping container:

Sample holding times exceeded? Yes [ No 7.

8. Samples have:
  • Itape -hazard labels

..." *Custody seals "" *appropriate sample labels

9. Samples are:'

.e, in good condition - "j eaking broken -have air bubbles Yes [ No r

10. Were any anomalies identified in sample receipt?

I. .Description of anomalies, (include sample numbers):

D  : CK)

S~ample Custodian/Laboratory:

By .

Telephoned to: On -

." ..

OnBY - .8

RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS 9

Radiochemistry Case Narrative Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co. (YANK)

Work Order 167554 Method/Analysis Information Product: Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS 226 Ingrowth Waived Analytical Method: EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 551072 Prep Batch Number: 550535 Sample ID Client ID 167554001 9106-0007-018F 167554002 9106-0007-019F 167554003 9106-0007-02OF 167554004 9106-0007-021F 1201142442 Method Blank (MB) 1201142443 167554001(9106-0007-018F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201142444 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-0 13 REV# 11.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

10

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 167554001 (9106-0007-018F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Sample 1201142443 (9106-0007-018F) was recounted due to a peak shift.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Additional Comments The sample and the duplicate, 1201142443 (9106-0007-018F) and 167554001 (9106-0007-018F), did not meet the relative percent difference for Ac-228, however, they do meet the relative error ratio requirement with a value of 2.48.

Qualifier information Qualifier Reason Analyte Sample UI Data rejected due to low abundance. Bismuth-214 167554003 Cesium-134 167554001 1201142443 Niobium-94 1201142442 Method/Analysis Information 11

Product: GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: EPA 905.0 Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 550821 Prep Batch Number: 550536 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 550535 Sample ID Client ID 167554001 9106-0007-018F 167554002 9106-0007-019F 167554003 9106-0007-020F 167554004 9106-0007-021F 1201141750 Method Blank (MB) 1201141751 167554004(9106-0007-021 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201141752 167554004(9106-0007-021 F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201141753 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-004 REV# 10.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (OC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 167554004 (9106-0007-021F).

QC Information 12

All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Chemical Recoveries All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.

Review Validation:

GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.

The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:

Reviewer/Date: e -

13

SAMPLE DATA

SUMMARY

14

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report for YANKOO Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.

Client SDG: MSR#06-1035 GEL Work Order: 167554 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
    • Analyte is a surrogate compound U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification ND The analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit.

The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis except where prohibited by the analytical procedure.

Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.

This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with General Engineering Laboratories, LLC standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Cheryl Jones.

Reviewed by 15

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis I I Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: August 4, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-018F Project: YANKO1204 Sample ID: 167554001 Client ID: YANK001 Matrix: SE Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 27-JUN-06 Receive Date: 2 1-JUL-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 20.8%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSSGAM & ALL FSS 226 Ingrowth Waived Actinium-228 0.607 +/-0.210 0.0785 +/-0.210 0.170 pCi/g MJH1 08/02/06 1912 551072 1 Americium-241 U -0.00546 +/-0.0943 0.0825 +/-0.0943 0.172 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.406 +/-0.315 0.177 +/-0.315 0.380 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.617 +/-0.117 0.039 +/-0.117 0.0834 pCi/g Cesium-134 UI 0.00 +/-0.0394 0.0284 +/-0.0394 0.0607 pCi/g Cesium-137 U 0.0162 +/-0.0282 0.025 +/-0.0282 0.0532 pCi/g Cobalt-60 U 0.0081 +/-0.0289 0.022 +/-0.0289 0.0492 pCi/g Europium-152 U -0.0303 +/-0.0665 0.0545 +/-0.0665 0.115 pCi/g Europium-154 U -0.0449 +/-0.0898 0.058 +/-0.0898 0.130 pCi/g Europium-155 U -0.0285 +/-0.0685 0.0572 +/-0.0685 0.119 pCi/g Lead-212 0.806 +/-0.074 0.0312 +/-0.074 0.0652 pCi/g Lead-214 0.619 +/-0.102 0.0379 +/-0.102 0.0803 pCi/g Manganese-54 U 0.0258 +/-0.0293 0.0263 +/-0.0293 0.0562 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.0027 +/-0.0233 0.0199 +/-0.0233 0.0427 pCi/g Potassium-40 12.7 +/-1.05 0.218 +/-1.05 0.488 pCi/g Radium-226 0.617 +/-0.117 0.039 +/-0.117 0.0834 pCi/g Silver-108m U -0.0112 +/-0.0233 0.0187 +/-0.0233 0.0397 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.296 +/-0.0602 0.0196 +/-0.0602 0.0421 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,Sr9O, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U 0.0176 +/-0.0187 0.0178 +/-0.0187 0.0395 pCi/g BXFI 07/30/06 1114 550821 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 07/21/06 1526 550535 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified 16

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: August 4, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-018F Proiect: YANK01204 Sample ID: 167554001 Client ID: YANKOOI Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 74 (25%-125%)

Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

17

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.corn Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: August 4, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-019F Proiect: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 167554002 Client ID: YANK001 Matrix: SE Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 27-JUN-06 Receive Date: 21-JUL-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 58.2%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS 226 Ingrowth Waived Actinium-228 0.941 +/-0.181 0.0678 +/-0.181 0.144 pCi/g MJHI 08/02/06 1913 551072 1 Americium-241 U -0.00939 +/-0.0865 0.0699 +/-0.0865 0.144 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.757 +/-0.354 0.144 +/-0.354 0.303 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.759 +/-0.0963 0.0335 +/-0.0963 0.0701 pCi/g Cesium-134 U 0.00776 +/-0.0351 0.024 +/-0.0351 0.0502 pCi/g Cesium-137 0.182 +/-0.0547 0.019 +/-0.0547 0.0398 pCi/g Cobalt-60 0.396 +/-0.0579 0.0188 +/-0.0579 0.0406 pCi/g Europium-152 U 0.0531 +/-0.0565 0.0488 +/-0.0565 0.101 pCi/g Europium-154 U 0.0674 +/-0.0738 0.0624 +/-0.0738 0.133 pCi/g Europium-155 U 0.0492 +/-0.094 0.0451 +/-0.094 0.0926 pCi/g Lead-212 0.950 +/-0.0874 0.0389 +/-0.0874 0.0795 pCi/g Lead-214 0.811 +/-0.108 0.0323 +/-0.108 0.0672 pCi/g Manganese-54 U -0.00104 +/-0.0266 0.0212 +/-0.0266 0.0445 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.0047 +/-0.0213 0.0174 +/-0.0213 0.0364 pCi/g Potassium-40 15.3 +/-0.991 0.184 +/-0.991 0.399 pCi/g Radium-226 0.759 +/-0.0963 0.0335 +/-0.0963 0.0701 pCi/g Silver-108m U 0.0134 +/-0.0205 0.0174 +/-0.0205 0.0362 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.327 +/-0.060 0.0174 +/-0.060 0.0366 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,SO9O, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U -0.00218 +/-0.0163 0.0188 +/-0.0163 0.0421 pCi/g BXFI 07/30/06 1114 550821 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 07/21/06 1526 550535 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits 18

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: August 4, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-019F Proiect: YANK01204 Sample ID: 167554002 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, S90, solid-ALL FSS 64 (25%-125%)

Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

19

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.corn Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: August 4, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-020F Proiect: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 167554003 Client ID: YANK001 Matrix: SE Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 27-JUN-06 Receive Date: 2 1-JUL-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 43.8%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS 226 Ingrowth Waived Actinium-228 0.665 +/-0.276 0.139 +/-0.276 0.305 pCi/g MJHI1 08/02/06 1913 551072 1 Americium-241 U -0.0107 +/-0.0581 0.0452 +/-0.0581 0.0942 pCi/g Bismuth-212 U 0.675 +/-0.375 0.364 +/-0.375 0.780 pCi/g Bismuth-214 UI 0.00 +/-0.197 0.143 +/-0.197 0.297 pCi/g Cesium-134 U 0.0421 +1-0.0515 0.0461 +/-0.0515 0.100 pCi/g Cesium-137 0.482 +/-0.0856 0.0368 +/-0.0856 0.0801 pCi/g Cobalt-60 0.165 +/-0.0946 0.0298 +/-0.0946 0.0699 pCi/g Europium-152 U -0.0512 +/-0.096 0.0685 +/-0.096 0.148 pCi/g Europium-154 U -0.0675 +/-0.140 0.109 +/-0.140 0.246 pCi/g Europium-155 U 0.0633 +/-0.0856 0.0762 +/-0.0856 0.159 pCi/g Lead-212 0.887 +/-0.116 0.0428 +/-0.116 0.0907 pCi/g Lead-214 0.796 +/-0.170 0.0539 +/-0.170 0.116 pCi/g Manganese-54 U 0.0617 +/-0.0505 0.0414 +/-0.0505 0.0902 pCi/g Niobium-94 U 0.0119 +/-0.0401 0.0342 +/-0.0401 0.0742 pCi/g Potassium-40 13.0 +/- 1.43 0.273 +/-1.43 0.650 pCi/g Radium-226 0.763 +/-0.197 0.0675 +/-0.197 0.146 pCi/g Silver-108m U -0.0182 +/-0.0344 0.028 +/-0.0344 0.0604 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.268 +/-0.0774 0.032 +/-0.0774 0.0701 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,Sr9O, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U 0.0215 +/-0.0202 0.0186 +/-0.0202 0.0416 pCi/g BXFI 07/30/06 1114 550821 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 07/21/06 1526 550535 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits 20

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: August 4, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-020F Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 167554003 Client ID: YANKOOI Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch .Mtd Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier[Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr9O, solid-ALL FSS 66 (25%-125%)

Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

21

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: August 4, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-021F Project: YANK01204 Sample ID: 167554004 Client ID: YANK001 Matrix: SE Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 27-JUN-06 Receive Date: 21 -JUL-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 44.4%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Ganima,Solid-FSSGAM & ALL FSS 226 Ingrowth Waived 2 28 +/-0.156 +/-0.156 0.126 pCi/g Actinium- 0.860 0.0595 MJHI 08/02/06 1948 551072 1 Americium-241 U 0.00906 +/-0.0996 0.074 +/-0.0996 0.152 pCi/g Bismuth-212 0.466 +/-0.256 0.118 +/-0.256 0.250 pCi/g Bismuth-214 0.558 +/-0.0845 0.0308 +/-0.0845 0.0644 pCi/g Cesium-134 U 0.0199 +/-0.0236 0.0203 +/-0.0236 0.0426 pCi/g Cesium-137 0.394 +/-0.0523 0.0169 +/-0.0523 0.0353 pCi/g Cobalt-60 0.543 +/-0.0621 0.0163 +/-0.0621 0.0353 pCi/g 2 +/-0.0502 0.0396 +/-0.0502 pCi/g Europium-15 U -0.026 0.0823 Europium-154 U 0.00991 +/-0.0628 0.0529 +/-0.0628 0.113 pCi/g Europium-155 U 0.0754 +/-0.0791 0.0434 +/-0.0791 0.0891 pCi/g Lead-212 0.849 +/-0.0606 0.0235 +/-0.0606 0.0484 pCi/g Lead-214 0.751 +/-0.0888 0.0292 +/-0.0888 0.0606 pCi/g Manganese-54 U 0.00934 +/-0.0227 0.019 +/-0.0227 0.0398 pCi/g Niobium-94 U-0.000717 +/-0.0178 0.0147 +/-0.0178 0.0308 pCi/g Potassium-40 13.8 +/-0.839 0.138 +/-0.839 0.303 pCi/g Radium-226 0.558 +/-0.0845 0.0308 +/-0.0845 0.0644 pCi/g Silver-108m U 0.00431 +/-0.0169 0.0146 +/-0.0169 0.0304 pCi/g Thallium-208 0.236 +/-0.0458 0.0173 +/-0.0458 0.036 pCi/g Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC,SO9O, solid-ALL FSS Strontium-90 U -0.00221 +/-0.0165 0.019 +/-0.0165 0.0426 pCi/g BXFI 07/30/06 1114 550821 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 07/21/06 1526 550535 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 EPA 905.0 Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits 22

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: August 4, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-021F Project: YANKO1204 Sample ID: 167554004 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Carrier/Tracer Recovery GFPC, Sr90, solid-ALL FSS 64 (25%-/125%)

Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

23

I. .1 QUALITY CONTROL DATA I

24

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Report Date: August 4, 2006 Client : Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Page 1 of 5 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Workorder: 167554 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anlst Date Time Rad Gamma Spec Batch 551072 QC1201142443 161554001 DUP Actinium-228 0.607 0.942 pCi/g 43 (0%- 100%) MJHI 08/03/06 16:47 Uncert: +/-0.210 +/-0.161 TPU: +/-0.210 +/-0.161 Americium-241 U -0.00546 U 0.0409 pCi/g 262 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0943 +/-0.0945 TPU: +/-0.0943 +/-0.0945 Bismuth-2 12 0.406 0.572 pCi/g 34 (0% - 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.315 +/-0.247 TPU: +/-0.315 +/-0.247 Bismuth-214 0.617 0.511 pCi/g 19 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.117 +/-0.082 TPU: +/-0.117 +/-0.082 Cesium- 134 UI 0.00 UI 0.00 pCi/g 54 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0394 +/-0.0389 TPU: +/-0.0394 +/-0.0389 Cesium-137 U 0.0162 U 0.0108 pCi/g 40 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0282 +/-0.0236 TPU: +/-0.0282 +/-0.0236 Cobalt-60 U 0.0081 U -0.00596 pCi/g 1310 (0% - 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0289 +/-0.0256 TPU: +/-0.0289 +/-0.0256 Europium- 152 U -0.0303 U 0.0289 pCi/g 8110 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0665 +/-0.0611 TPU: +/-0.0665 +/-0.0611 Europium- 154 U -0.0449 U -0.0434 pCi/g 3 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0898 +/-0.0712 TPU: +/-0.0898 +/-0.0712 Europium- 155 U -0.0285 U 0.0611 pCi/g 551 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0685 +/-0.0611 TPU: +/-0.0685 +/-0.0611 Lead-212 0.806 0.769 pCi/g 5 (0%- 20%)

Uncert: +/-0.074 +/-0.0747 TPU: +/-0.074 +/-0.0747 Lead-214 0.619 0.581 pCi/g 6 (0% - 20%)

Uncert: +/-0.102 +/-0.104 TPU: +/-0.102 +/-0.104 Manganese-54 U 0.0258 U 0.00407 pCi/g 146 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0293 +/-0.0264 TPU: +/-0.0293 +/-0.0264 Niobium-94 U 0.0027 U 0.0192 pCi/g 151 (0% - 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0233 +/-0.0223 TPU: +/-0.0233 +/-0.0223 25

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 167554 Page 2 of 5 0

Pnrmn m2 NO*M Samnle u1al A*C Units RPD% REC% Range AnIst Date Time Parmnarne NOM Sample Oual Rad Gamma Spec Batch 551072 Potassium-40 12.7 13.6 pCi/g 7 (0% - 20%)

Uncert: +1-1.05 +/-1.08 TPU: +1-1.05 +/-1.08 Radium-226 0.617 0.511 pCi/g 19 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.117 +/-0.082 TPU: +/-0.117 +/-0.082 Silver- 108m U -0.0112 U -0.0243 pCi/g 74 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0233 +/-0.0202 TPU: +/-0.0233 +/-0.0202 Thallium-208 0.296 0.257 pCi/g 14 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0602 +/-0.0534 TPU: +/-0.0602 +/-0.0534 QC 1201142444 LCS Actinium-228 U 0.275 pCi/g 08/03/06 05:27 Uncert: +/-0.804 TPU: +/-0.804 Americium-241 23.4 26.8 pCi/g 115 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-2.21 TPU: +/-2.21 Bismuth-212 U 0.389 pCi/g Uncert: +/-1.43 TPU: +/-1.43 Bismuth-214 U -0.0491 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.307 TPU: +/-0.307 Cesium- 134 U 0.0646 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.207 TPU: +/-0.207 Cesium-137 9.60 9.54 pCi/g 99 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-1.06 TPU: +/-1.06 Cobalt-60 14.7 15.4 pCi/g 105 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.830 TPU: +/-0.830 Europium- 152 U 0.132 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.389 TPU: +/-0.389 Europium- 154 U 0.0318 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.440 TPU: +/-0.440 Europium-155 U 0.221 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.340 TPU: +/-0.340 Lead-212 U -0.0774 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.199 TPU: +/-0.199 Lead-214 U -0.134 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.267 26

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel com QC Summary Workorder: 167554 Page 3 of 5 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC%

  • Range Anist Date Time Rad Gamma Spec Batch 551072 TPU: +/-0.267 Manganese-54 U 0.102 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.193 TPU: +/-0.193 Niobium-94 U 0.091 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.193 TPU: +/-0.193 Potassium-40 U 0.974 pCi/g Uncert: +/-1.40 TPU: +/-1.40 Radium-226 U -0.0491 pCi/g (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.307 TPU: +/-0.307 Silver- 108m U -0.121 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.153 TPU: +/-0.153 Thallium-208 U -0.0415 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.173 TPU: +/-0.173 QC1201142442 MB Actinium-228 U 0.0413 pCi/g 08/02/06 19:46 Uncert: +/-0.0698 TPU: +/-0.0698 Americium-241 U 0.0148 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0576 TPU: +/-0.0576 Bismuth-212 U -0.0124 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.132 TPU: +/-0.132 Bismuth-2 14 U 0.035 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0379 TPU: +/-0.0379 Cesium- 134 U 0.0241 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0188 TPU: +/-0.0188 Cesium- 137 U 0.00493 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0174 TPU: +/-0.0174 Cobalt-60 U 0.0076 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.020 TPU: +/-0.020 Europium- 152 U -0.0255 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0444 TPU: +/-0.0444 Europium- 154 U -0.00476 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0509 TPU: +/-0.0509 Europium- 155 U 0.037 pCi/g 27

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 167554 Page 4 of 5 NIN]* Q-mnln i- Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Gamma Spec Batch 551072 Uncert: +/-0.0465 TPU: +/-0.0465 Lead-212 U 0.0216 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0576 TPU: +/-0.0576 Lead-214 U 0.00962 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0446 TPU: +/-0.0446 Manganese-54 U 0.00114 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.016 TPU: +/-0.0,16 Niobium-94 UI 0.00 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0378 TPU: +/-0.0378 Potassium-40 U 0.275 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.204 TPU: +/-0.204 Radium-226 U 0.035 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0379 TPU: +/-0.0379 Silver- 108m U -0.016 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0153 TPU: +/-0.0153 Thallium-208 U 0.0252 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0459 TPU: +/-0.0459 Rad Gas Flow Batch 550821 QC1201141751 167554004 DUP Strontium-90 U -0.00221 U -0.00355 pCi/g 0 (0%- 100%) BXFI 07/30/06 12:41 Uncert: +/-0.0165 +/-0.0144 TPU: +/-0.0165 +/-0.0144 QC1201141753 LCS Strontium-90 1.53 1.55 pCi/g 102 (75%-125%) 07/30/06 17:23 Uncert: +/-0.101 TPU: +/-0.111 QC1201141750 MB Strontium-90 U -0.00113 pCi/g 07/30/06 12:26 Uncert: +/-0.014 TPU: +/-0.014 QC1201141752 167554004 MS Strontium-90 1.54 U -0.00221 1.43 pCi/g 93 (75%-125%) 07/30/06 12:41 Uncert: +/-0.0165 +/-0.136 TPU: +/-0.0165 +/-0.142 Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

28

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 167554 Page 5 of 5 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification x Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.

    • Indicates analyte is a surrogate compound.

^ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptence criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of+/- the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.

For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.

Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.

29

5J

  • GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.

ýp~ Meeting Today~s Needs Mth a Vision for Tomorrow 0

4?i November 06, 2006 Mr. Jack McCarthy Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Re: Soils PO# 002332 Work Order: 175290 SDG: MSR#06-1310

Dear Mr. McCarthy:

General Engineering Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the following analytical results for the sample(s) we received on July 21, 2006 and May 24, 2006. This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures.

Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (843) 556-8171, ext. 4243.

Sincerely, Cheryl Jones Project Manager Purchase Order: 002332 Chain of Custody: 2006-00363 and 2006-00441 Enclosures P.O. BOX 30712 Cherleston, SC 29417 - 2040 Savage Road (29407)

Phone (843) 556-81 71 - Fax (843) 766-1178 www.gel.com

Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.

Soils PO# 002332 Work Order: 175290 SDG: MSR#06-1310 Laboratory ID Client ID 175290001 9106-0007-014F 175290002 9106-0007-021 F

Table of Contents General Narrative .................................................................. 1 Chain of Custody .................................................................. 4 Data Review Qualifier Flag Definitions .............................. 13 Radiological Analysis .......................................................... 15 Sample Data Summary ..................................................... 47 Quality Control Data ........................................................... 55

General Narrative 1

General Narrative for Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.

Work Order: 175290 SDG: MSR#06-1310 November 06, 2006 Laboratory Identification:

General Engineering Laboratories, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston, South Carolina 29407 (843) 556-8171 Summary Sample receipt The samples arrived at General Engineering Laboratories, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on July 21, 2006 and May 24, 2006 for analysis. Shipping container temperatures were checked, documented, and within specifications. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage.

Sample Identification The laboratory received the following samples:

Laboratory Sample Identification Description 175290001 9106-0007-014F 175290002 9106-0007-021F Items of Note At the request of Dale Randall via email on 10/31/06, the samples listed above we relogged for additional tests.

Case Narrative Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in General Engineering Laboratories (GEL)

Standard Operating Procedures. Any technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical case narratives in the enclosed data package.

Analytical Request Two soil samples were reanalyzed for FSSALL excluding Strontium-90 and FSSGAM.

Data Package The enclosed data package contains the following sections: General Narrative, Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation, Data Review Qualifier Definitions, and data from the following fractions: Radiochemistry.

I certify that this data package is in compliance with the SOW, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hard copy data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or a designee, as verified by the following signature.

Project Manager GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.

P.O. BOX 30712 Charleston, SC 29417 - 2040 Savage Road (29407)

Phone (843) 556-8171 - FaxY43) 766-1178 www.gel.com

List of current GEL Certifications as of 01 November 2006 State Certification Alaska UST-062 Arizona AZ0668 Arkansas 88-0651 CLIA L 42D0904046 California 01 151CA Colorado L GenEngLabs Connecticut PH-0169 Dept. of Navy NFESC 413 EPA WG-15J Florida/NELAP E87156 Georgia E87156 (FL/NELAP)

Hawaii N/A Idaho N/A Illinois 200029 Indiana C-SC-01 Kansas E-10332 Kentucky 90129 Louisiana 03046 Maryland 270 Massachusetts M-SCO12 Michigan 9903 Nevada SC12 New Jersey SCO02 New Mexico FL NELAP E87156 New York 11501 North Carolina 233 North Carolina Drinking W 45709 North Dakota R-158 Oklahoma 9904 Pennsylvania 68-00485 South Carolina 10120001/10585001/10120002 Tennessee 02934 Texas TX213-2006A Texas NELAP T104704235-06-TX U.S. Dept. of Agriculture S-52597 US Army Corps of Engineer f N/A Utah [ 8037697376 GEL Vermont F VT87156 Virginia 1 00151 Washington C1641 3

Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation 4

recJ -7 9Q'O Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5104-003-Attachment B-CY-001 Major Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Chain of Custody Form No. 2006-0036 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556 6,/ 62

_ .".

Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning Analyses Requested 14M Contact Name & Phone: ~~I Jack McCarthy 860-267-2556 Ext. 3024 i": i*:' *'

Analytical Lab (Name, City, State) . . .

General Engineering Laboratories .A .

2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407  : :Y . :s* ;-,

843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones -.  : .,..-

Priority 30 D. M 14 D. fl7 D. Cnanr. ~. iS S_am_ p_le _ _ Si

_ _ z_e-_ . , i. "' ,,.

,A< 4...

Media Type &TyVe -

Sample Designation Date Time Code Code Code Comment, Preservatin IA' 9106-0007-007F 5/08/06 15:11 SE C BP x x Transferred from COC 2006-00329 / 4, 9106-0007-008F 5/09/06 10:39 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 a 9106-0007-01 IF 5/09/06 09:43 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 9106-0007-012F 5/09/06 13:27 SE C BP X K Transferred from COC 2006-00334 * ..

9106-0007-013F 5/09/06 13:53 SE C BP X X Transferred from COC 2006-00334 5/09/06 14:13 SE BP C .9106-0007-013FS x x Transferredfrom COC2006-00334 j 9106-0007-014F 5/09/06 14:13 SE C BP x x Transferred from COC 2006-00334 - &1

\k 9106-0007-015F 5/16/06 07:56 SE C BP X x Transferred from COC 2006-00353 NOTES: PO #: 002332 MSR#: 06- O't3 SSWP#NA [ LTP QA D RadwasteQA E Non QA Samples Shipped Via:

UPS **

1). 'linquisl] Date/Timne :2) R eiv Byt ,." Date/Time [] Hander *

........ 5 lf Ohe Bill of Lading #

Vq21 6573 6 W

SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM PM use only Client: Order: tSDG/ARCOC/Wor Date Received: PM(A) Review (eusure n-con are resolved prior to signing):

Received By:

Sample Receipt Criteria ZO Comments/Qualifiers (Required for Non-Conforming Items) rircle Applicable: seals broken damaged container leaking container other (describe)

Shipping containers received intact 1 and sealed?

Samples requiring cold Circle Coolant # ice bags blue Ice dry ice e other describe) 2 preservation within (4 +/- 2 C)?

_Record preservation method.

Chain of custody documents lincluded with shipment?

4 Sample containers intact and Circle Applicable: seals broken damaged container leaking centainer other (describe) sealed?

Samples requiring chemical Sample 1D's, containers affected and observed pH:

preservation at proper pH? -

Sample D's and containers affected:

6 VOA vials free of headspace

- (defined as < 6mm bubble)?

Are Encore containers present?

7 (If yes, immediately deliver to VOA laborator__

Id's and tests affected:

Samples received within holding 8 time?

9 Sample ID's on COC match ID's Sample ID's ard containers affected:

on bottles?

Date & time on COC match date Sample ID's affected:

& time on bottles? _

11 Number of containers received Sample tD's affected:

match number indicated on COC?

12 COC form is properly signed in relinquished/received sections?

Air Bill ,Tracking #'s, &

14

,7 :5v/

Additional Comments

  • '~ RSO RAD Receipt #__

fI Suspected Hazard Infrmation 1f > x2 area background is observed on samples identified as *otn-Z0 regulated/non-radioactivew, contact the Radiation Safety group for further

_ investigation.

XJRadiological: lassifiCation? Maximum Counts Observed*: 40 B JPUB Regulated? 12Comments:

9m1WR as '. r Hazardous C [Material? If yes, contact Waste 6 Hazard Class Shipped:

FManager or ESH Manager. UN#:

PM (or PMA) review of Hazard classification: Initials Date:

6

Connecticut Yankee Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Services -CY-ISC-SOW-O01 Figure 1. -Sample Check-in List.

Date/Time Received- ~~C 4 SDG#: -073,b Work Order Number- ___________________

  • Shipping Cdntainer I Chain of Custody tQUA~e. Zi, I Custody Seals odahipping container intact?... -Yes 4No (J
2. Custody Seals dated and signed?

Yes',J/ No [ ]

- 3. Chain-of-Custody record prýsent?

yeskfNol[

4. Cooler em-perature C*.
5. Verrticulite/packing materials is:

Wet [ 3 Dry '\ J .

6.: Numberofsarnples in shipping container:. " ___'

7- Sample holding times e.xceeded?

Yes [ j No

8. Samples have_"

-a.ehazard labels

-/-Custody seals appropriate sample labels

A good condition -_._leaking ':-.

brokn *, " '" " have air bubbles

10. IWe any anomalies identifie*w in sample receipt? "es No f]

il" . :Description of anomalies (include sample numbers):

"" ampie

.. oatory~Da.t..

  • . " "diWabr
  • "Telephoned to . ". ___ O .. y 7

Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5 104-003 -Attachment B-CY-00 Major Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Chain of Custody Form No. 2006-00441 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556 Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning Analyses Requested Lab Use Only Contact Name & Phone: 1 Comments:

Jack McCarthy 860-267-3924 i Analytical Lab (Name, City, State)

General Engineering Laboratories 2040 Savage Road. Charleston SC. 29407 843 556 8171. Attn. Cheryl Jones V .

Priority: .* 0 D. Z 14 D. El 7 D. Container Sample Size-Media Type &Type Sample Designation Date Time Code Code Code Comment, Preservation Lab Sample ID 9106-0007-018F 6-27-06 /,,' SE C BP X" I X 9106-0007-019F 6-27-06 3' SE C BP " -_

9106-0007-020F 6-27-06 i3,. 4F SE C BP M _"

9106-0007-021F 6.27-06 j ,o* SE C BP )" _

NOTES: P04: 002332 MSR 9: 06- /0 -; SSWP# NA Z LTP QA El Radwaste QA F- Non QA Samples Shipped Via: Internal Container

[ Fed Ex Temp.: IL Deg. C El ups El Hand Custody Seale/d?

YU NZ

1) Relinq Date/Time. 2) Received By Date/Time Custody Seal Intact?

0l Other 3),Felinquished By D6 /Tire i 4) R.eceivedRy Date/Time YF] N 0 7715/4 ý*? of Lading Bill 1O #

5 7 !{ 04 u

qyN64 RCEP & REVIEW, FORM SSAMPLEREIP

'0lO I IM a." only IDateReceied:

_ __ _*_

_

cuesut:(Q\.j~'~.A~L.

\~\~ ~PM(A)

SMGARCOC/Work Order-Review (es~no*n (1 5 f~rM o g.U are)reotved prior to uigulnW:

[Received BY:" I- . I -

Sample Receipt Criteria Z CommentslQualirwrs (Requirid for Non-Conforning Items)

IShipping containers received ifitact Crcle APp.icable: seals bioken da.,-d c .nsiaer l kakieg maimr odti (describe) land sealed? -

, Samples requiring cold ti.k Ccah ice ag, s ba I, dr ,ze d e) 2 preservation within (4 +/- 2 C)? / - ,

Record preservation method. _ Cc . i.

SChain of custody documents included with shipment? .

Sample containers intact and Circle A^icable: sob broken damged i leaking conaier oier (describe) 4scaled?-

Samples requiring chemical sample IVS, Omi=I aftecitl a*.

  • oberv pr preservation at proper pH?

VOA vials free of headspace mpleID's ad containers affected:

(defined as < 6mn bubbl?*

Are Encore containers present?

7 (If yes, immediately deliver to VOA la b o ra to ry ) .__ - - - - - - -- -- _- --

Samples received within holding Id's 3ad sea affied:

lime? _ Iuncl ID's andIcomainer uffecret:

Sample ID's on COC match ID's / 1 a a £ue on bottles?  : . ,, f, i. q, Date & time on COC match date Sample ID's affectedt:

& time on bottles? _

Number of containers received /mple ID's aff(cied:

match number indicated on COC?

COC form is property signed in /

12 relinquished/received sections? , __

Air Bill ,Tracking Fs, &

Additional Comments

_

-a RSO RAID RceiptD__#_

Suspected Hazard Inrormation 1 - n-

-l I regulatedI/onioac*cot', the Pradiation Safety group for firther actw=

[ investigation.

-A Rio0logical.Classification? Maximum Counts Observed*e: *_ __ _10

___

i PCB Regulated?

Shfipped as DUPI Hazardous C IMaterial? If yes, contact Waste Hazard Class Shipped:

-Manager or ESH Manager. 01-: i PM (or PMA) review of lazard classiticaimn.. Initials Ie:  :{-z V) 9

SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM CONTINUATION FORM

- '-o _Vc-I1Z2l- Zc 2-

'C 9.r* *4 O W -CO*X13-Oc F Ef~ds t0LJl4 qlo-0or*- ObqLW-10

Connecticut Yankee Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Services .CY-lSC-*iUW-00l Figure 1. Sample Check-in List.

Date/rime Received: )'\ ( . - " "

'A: 10 5 *D#: .C .

Work Order Number: __/ __._ ___ _"

Shipping Cdbtainer ID-* C ,,QL Vk.R ,QL . Chain of Custody*# CIY*.

ecD *

  • _'
1. Custody Seals.oi shipping container intact?,.., Yes [] No j4
2. Custody Seals dated and signed? Yes [j No [4
3. Chain-of-Custody record present? YesJ 1 4No I[
4. Cooler temperature 2* C .fYX.
5. :Vermiculite/packing materials -is: Wet (IDry [ 4~
6. -Numberof samples in shipping container: '. (x * . \'3-\ -.
7. Sample.hoding times exceeded? Yes [ No 8., Samples have:,

.... ___hazard labels Z/. ustody seals .. eappropriate sample labels

9. Samples are:
  • good condition ._.."leaking

..........brken..........javc air bubbles

10. Were any anomalies identified in ple receipt? Yes[jNo 11.. D -escription of anomalies (include sample numbers):

S.ample Custodian/Laberatory:iK,'. , Date.-]C\lL_ * -

Telephoned to: On By______________________

11 ---

HTD analyses

Subject:

HTD analyses From: "Dale Randall" <randall @cyapco.com>

Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:07:23 -0500 To: "Cheryl Jones" <cj@gel.com>

CC: "Arthur L. Hammond" <Hammond@CYAPCO.com>, "Clyde Newson"

<Newson @CYAPCO.com>

Cheryl:

Per our earlier discussion, please analyze samples 9106-0007-014F and 9106-0007-021 F to the FSSALL protocol per MSR 06-1310, with a 7 day TAT. Each of these samples were previously tested for FSSGAM and Sr-90 under MSR 06-0730 and MSR 06-1035 respectively. Thank you for your assistance.

Thank You, Dale (860) 267-3133 IloflI 12 I 1/1/2006 8:13 AM

Data Review Qualifier Definitions 13

Data Review Qualifier Definitions Qualifier Explanation A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

    • Analyte is a surrogate compound
  • Result is less than value reported
  • Result is greater than value reported RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <SX the RL A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank B Metals-Either presence of analyte detected in the associated blank, or MDL/IDL < sample value < PQL BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample d 5-day BOD-The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample E Organics-Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range E Metals-%difference of sample and SD is >10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria H Analytical holding time was exceeded h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N Metals-The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits N Organics-Presumptive evidence based on mass spectral library search to make a tentative identification of the analyte (TIC). Quantitation is based on nearest internal standard response factor N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more ND Analyte concentration is not detected above the reporting limit UI Gamma Spectroscopy-Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound Z Paint Filter Test-Particulates passed through the filter, however no free liquids were observed.

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.

P.O. BOX 30712 Charleston, SC 29417 - 2040 Savage Road (29407)

Phone (843) 556-8171 - FaI(43) 766-1178 www.gel.com

RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS 15

Radiochemistry Case Narrative Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co. (YANK)

Work Order 175290 Method/Analysis Information Product: Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 584736 Prep Batch Number: 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 584673 Sample ID Client ID 175290001 9106-0007-014F 1201220181 Method Blank (MB) 1201220182 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220183 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220184 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

16

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Sample 1201220181 (MB) was recounted due to a negative result greater than three times the error.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information 17

Product: Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 584744 Prep Batch Number: 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 584675 Sample ID Client ID 175290002 9106-0007-021F 1201220201 Method Blank (MB) 1201220202 175290002(9106-0007-021 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220203 175290002(9106-0007-02 IF) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220204 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290002 (9106-0007-02 IF).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

18

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-1 1-RC Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 584737 Prep Batch Number: 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 584673 19

Sample ID Client ID 175290001 9106-0007-014F 1201220185 Method Blank (MB) 1201220186 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220187 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220188 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 1 REV# 14.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this 20

SDG.

Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Pu- 11-RC Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 584743 Prep Batch Number: 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 584673 Sample ID Client ID 175290001 9106-0007-014F 1201220197 Method Blank (MB) 1201220198 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220199 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220200 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-035 REV# 8.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

21

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples 1201220197 (MB), 1201220198 (9106-0007-014F), 1201220200 (LCS) and 175290001 (9106-0007-014F) were recounted due to quench being outside calibration.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. The following NCR was generated for this SDG:

NCR 380650 was generated due to Sample Analyzed out of Holding. 1. Sample 175290001 was analyzed out of holding. 1. Reporting results.

Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information 22

Product: Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Pu- 11-RC Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 584747 Prep Batch Number: 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 584675 Sample ID Client ID 175290002 9106-0007-021F 1201220218 Method Blank (MB) 1201220219 175290002(9106-0007-021 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220220 175290002(9106-0007-021 F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220221 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 14.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (Q0 Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290002 (9106-0007-021F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

23

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-1i -RC Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 584751 Prep Batch Number: 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 584675 24

Sample ID Client ID 175290002 9106-0007-021F 1201220222 Method Blank (MB) 1201220223 175290002(9106-0007-021 F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220224 175290002(9106-0007-021F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220225 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-035 REV# 8.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290002 (9106-0007-021F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples were recounted due to quench number being outside calibration range.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this 25

SDG.

Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analytical Batch Number: 584644 Sample ID Client ID 175290002 9106-0007-021F 1201219905 Method Blank (MB) 1201219906 175288015(9512-00-003F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201219907 175288015(9512-00-003F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201219908 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-005 REV# 13.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QCQ Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

26

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288015 (9512-00-003F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Oualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analytical Batch Number: 584692 Sample ID Client ID 175290001 9106-0007-014F 1201220020 Method Blank (MB) 1201220021 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220022 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220023 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 27

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-005 REV# 13.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. The following NCR was generated for this SDG:

NCR 380217 was generated due to Sample Analyzed out of Holding. 1. Sample 175290001 is a relog of 163626014 causing the sample to be analyzed out of holding. 1. Reporting results.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

28

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Fe-1, Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 584650 Prep Batch Number: 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-02 1 Batch Number: 584675 Sample ID Client ID 175290002 9106-0007-021F 1201219928 Method Blank (MB) 1201219929 175288015(9512-00-003F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201219930 175288015(9512-00-003F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201219931 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-040 REV# 3.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Ouality Control (OC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

29

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288015 (9512-00-003F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Fe-1, Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 584687 Prep Batch Number: 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 584673 30

Sample ID Client ID 175290001 9106-0007-014F 1201220008 Method Blank (MB) 1201220009 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220010 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220011 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-040 REV# 3.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this 31

SDG.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Ni-1, Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 584649 Prep Batch Number: 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 584675 Sample ID Client ID 175290002 9106-0007-021F 1201219924 Method Blank (MB) 1201219925 175288015(9512-00-003F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201219926 175288015(9512-00-003F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201219927 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-022 REV# 8.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

32

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288015 (9512-00-003F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Ni-1, Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 584690 Prep Batch Number: 584677 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 584673 33

Sample ID Client ID 175290001 9106-0007-014F 1201220016 Method Blank (MB) 1201220017 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220018 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220019 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-022 REV# 8.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples were recounted due to low/high recovery.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation 34

Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. The following NCR was generated for this SDG:

NCR 380283 was generated due to Sample Analyzed out of Holding. 1. Sample 17529001 was a relog of 163626014 causing the recount of the sample to be out of holding. 1. Reporting results Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid-HTD2,ALL FSS Analytical Method: EPA 906.0 Modified Analytical Batch Number: 584693 Sample ID Client ID 175290001 9106-0007-014F 1201220024 Method Blank (MB) 1201220025 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220026 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220027 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-002 REV# 13.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Ouality Control (0C) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

35

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. The following NCR was generated for this SDG:

NCR 379311 was generated due to Container scanning event for custody missed. 1. The analyst did not scan the sample 175290 001 into the batch prior to analysis, however the samples did remain in their custody at all times. 1. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the proper scanning procedures.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid-HTD2,ALL FSS Analytical Method: EPA 906.0 Modified Analytical Batch Number: 585989 36

Sample ID Client ID 175290002 9106-0007-021F 1201223381 Method Blank (MB) 1201223382 175288015(9512-00-003F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201223383 175288015(9512-00-003F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201223384 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-002 REV# 13.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QCQ Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288015 (9512-00-003F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples 1201223381 (MB) and 175290002 (9106-0007-021F) were reprepped due to high relative percent difference/relative error ratio.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from 37

referenced SOP or contractual documents. The following NCR was generated for this SDG:

NCR 380628 was generated due to Container scanning event for custody missed. 1. The analyst did not scan the samples 175288 015,018, 175290 002 into the batch prior to analysis, however the samples did remain in their custody at all times. 1. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the proper scanning procedures.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint C14, Solid AII,FSS Analytical Method: EPA EERF C-01 Modified Analytical Batch Number: 584648 Sample ID Client ID 175290002 9106-0007-021F 1201219920 Method Blank (MB) 1201219921 175288018(9512-00-007F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201219922 175288018(9512-00-007F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201219923 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-003 REV# 8.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information 38

The blank volume is representative of the sample volumes in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175288018 (9512-00-007F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Sample 1201219920 (MB) was recounted due to the quench number being outside the calibration range. Samples 1201219922 (9512-00-007F) and 1201219923 (LCS) were recounted due to analyst error.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Additional Comments Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint C14, Solid AII,FSS Analytical Method: EPA EERF C-01 Modified Analytical Batch Number: 584694 39

Sample ID Client ID 175290001 9106-0007-014F 1201220028 Method Blank (MB) 1201220029 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1201220030 175290001(9106-0007-014F) Matrix Spike (MS) 1201220031 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-003 REV# 8.

Calibration Information:

Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.

Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).

Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.

Quality Control (QC) Information:

Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.

Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 175290001 (9106-0007-014F).

QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.

Technical Information:

Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.

Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.

Miscellaneous Information:

NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A nonconformance report (NCR) was not generated for this SDG.

Additional Comments 40

Additional comments were not required for this sample set.

Qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.

Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.

Review Validation:

GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.

The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:

11/V 1,

Reviewer/Date: KAOO&O- -6 41

General Engineering Laboratories NCR Report No.: 379311 Form GEL-NCR Revision No.:

Rev. 06/05 COMPANY -WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr. Division: Quality Criteria: Type:

03-NOV-06 Radiochemistry Specifications Process Instrument Type: Test I Method: Matrix Type: Client Code:

LSC EPA 906.0 Modified Solid YANK Batch ID: Sample Numbers:

584693 See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG): 175290(MSR#06-1310)

Application Issues:

Container scanning event for custody missed Specification and Requirements NRG Disposition:

Nonconformance

Description:

1. The analyst did not scan the sample 175290 001 into the batch prior to 1. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the analysis, however the samples did remain in their custody at all times, proper scanning procedures.

Originator's Name: Data Validator/Group Leader:

Amy Scott 03-NOV-06 Heather Anderson 08-NOV-06 Quality Review:

Director:

Page 1 42

General Engineering Laboratories NCR Report No.: 380217 Form GEL-NCR Revision No.: I Rev. 06/05 COMPANY - WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr. Division: Quality Criteria: Type:

07-NOV-06 Radiochemistry Specifications Process Instrument Type: Test / Method: Matrix Type: Client Code:

LSC DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Solid YANK

-Modified Batch ID: Sample Numbers:

584692 See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG): 175290(MSR#06-1310)

Application Issues:

Sample Analyzed out of Holding Specification and Requirements NRG Disposition:

Nonconformance

Description:

1. Sample 175290001 is a relog of 163626014 causing the sample to be 1. Reporting results.

analyzed out of holding.

Originator's Name: Data Validator/Group Leader:

Amy Scott 07-NOV-06 Heather Anderson 08-NOV-06 Quality Review:

Director:

Page 1 43

General Engineering Laboratories NCR Report No.: 380283 Form GEL-NCR Revision No.:

Rev. 06/05 COMPANY - WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Typie:tCoe Mo.Day Yr. Division: :Mtiy: Quality Criteria: Type:

stIMton DivimetTye:T 07-NOV-06 Radiochemistry Specifications Process Instrument Type: Test / Method: Matrix Type: Client Code:

LSC DOE RESL Ni-i, Modified Solid YANK Batch ID: Sample Numbers:

584690 See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG): 175290(MSR#06-1310)

Application Issues:

Sample Analyzed out of Holding Specification and Requirements INRG Disposition:

Nonconformance

Description:

I

1. Sample 17529001 was a relog of 163626014 causing the recount of 1. Reporting results the sample to be out of holding.

Originator's Name: Data Validator/Group Leader:

Kenshalla Oston 07-NOV-06 Heather Anderson 08-NOV-06 Quality Review:

Director:

Page 1 44

General Engineering Laboratories NCR Report No.: 380628 Form GEL-NCR Revision No.: 1 Rev. 06/05 COMPANY - WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr. Division: Quality Criteria: Type:

08-NOV-06 Radiochemistry Specifications Process Instrument Type: Test / Method: Matrix Type: Client Code:

LSC EPA 906.0 Modified Solid YANK Batch ID: Sample Numbers:

585989 See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG): 175288(MSR#06-1425),175290(MSR#06-131 0)

Application Issues:

Container scanning event for custody missed Specification and Requirements NRG Disposition:

Nonconformance

Description:

1. The analyst did not scan the samples 175288 015,018, 175290 002 1. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the into the batch prior to analysis, however the samples did remain in their proper scanning procedures.

custody at all times.

Originator's Name: Data Validator/Group Leader:

Amy Scott 08-NOV-06 Heather Anderson 08-NOV-06 Quality Review:

Director:

Page 1 45

General Engineering Laboratories NCR Report No.: 380650 Form GEL-NCR Rev. 06/05 Revision No.: 1 COMPANY - WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr. Division: Quality Criteria: Type:

08-NOV-06 Radiochemistry Specifications Process Instrument Type: Test / Method: Matrix Type: Client Code:

LSC DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-11-RC Solid YANK

- -- Modified Batch ID: Sample Numbers:

584743 See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG): 175290(MSR#06-1310)

Application Issues:

Sample Analyzed out of Holding Specification and Requirements NRG Disposition:

Nonconformance

Description:

1. Sample 175290001 was analyzed out of holding. 1. Reporting results.

Originator's Name: Data Validator/Group Leader:

Amy Scott 08-NOV-06 Heather Anderson 08-NOV-06 Quality Review:

Director:

Page 1 46

SAMPLE DATA

SUMMARY

47

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report for YANKOO Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.

Client SDG: MSR#06-1310 GEL Work Order: 175290 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
    • Analyte is a surrogate compound H Analytical holding time was exceeded U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

ND The analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit.

The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis except where prohibited by the analytical procedure.

Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.

This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with General Engineering Laboratories, LLC standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Cheryl Jones.

Reviewed by 48

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: November 8, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-014F Project: YANK01204 Sample ID: 175290001 Client ID: YANK001 Matrix: TS Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 09-MAY-06 Receive Date: 24-MAY-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 32.9%

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Americium-241 U 01.114 +/-0.191 0.119 +/-0.191 0.339 pCi/g BXLI 11/04/060951 584736 1 Curium-242 U 01.221 +/-0.321 0.159 +/-0.322 0.532 pCi/g Curium-243/244 U -0. 0195 +/-0.185 0.161 +/-0.185 0.425 pCi/g Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Plutonium-238 U 0.'0828 +/-0.114 0.0417 +/-0.114 0.172 pCi/g BXLI 11/04/060951 584737 2 Plutonium-239/2 4 0 U -0.' 0236 +/-0.0267 0.0509 +/-0.0268 0.190 pCi/g Liquid Scint Pu24 1, Solid-ALL FSS Plutonium-241 HU 3.30 +/-8.21 6.75 +/-8.22 14.2 pCi/g BXL1 11/07/06 1120 584743 3 Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid-HTD2,ALL FSS Tritium U 5.01 +/-7.25 5.74 +/-7.25 12.4 pCi/g DFA1 11/02/06 1021 584693 5 Liquid Scint C14, SolidA l1,FSS Carbon-14 U 0.136 +/-0.111 0.090 +/-0.111 0.185 pCi/g AXD2 11/03/06 0310 584694 6 Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Iron-55 U 28.0 +/-69.7 52.9 +/-69.8 112 pCi/g MXP1 11/03/06 1723 584687 7 Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Nickel-63 FlU -5.17 +/-8.15 7.07 +/-8.15 14.8 pCi/g MXPI 11/06/06 1639 584690 8 Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Technetium-99 HU 0.290 +/-0.204 0.166 +/-0.204 0.339 pCi/g KXRI 11/06/06 1345 584692 9 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXM1 11/01/06 1035 584673 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description 1 DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified 2 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-I I-RC Modified 3 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-I I-RC Modified 4 DOE EML HASL-300. Pu-I I-RC Modified 49

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.corn Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: November 8, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-014F Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 175290001 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd 5 EPA 906.0 Modified 6 EPA EERF C-01 Modified 7 DOE RESL Fe-I, Modified 8 DOE RESL Ni-I, Modified 9 DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified 10 DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Americium-243 Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL 71 (15%-125%)

Plutonium-242 Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS 87 (15%-0125%)

Plutonium-241 Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL F5 88 (25/-,125%)

Iron-55 Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FS 26 (15%-125%)

Nickel-63 Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FS 84 (25%-125%)

Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FS 84 (25%-125%)

Technetium-99 Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FS 78 (15%-125%)

Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FS 78 (150/6-125%)

Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

Ul Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded 50

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: November 8, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-014F Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 175290001 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

51

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.corn Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: November 8, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-021F Project: YANK01204 Sample ID: 175290002 Client ID: YANKOO Matrix: TS Vol. Recv.:

Collect Date: 27-JUN-06 Receive Date: 21 -JUL-06 Collector: Client Moisture: 59.5%

Parameter Qualifier R esult Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Americium-241 U 0. 0491 +/-0.185 0.136 +/-0.185 0.385 pCi/g MXA 11/03/06 0749 584744 1 M

Curium-242 U 0.134 +/-0.303 0.196 +/-0.303 0.588 pCi/g Curium-243/244 U 0.224 +/-0.307 0.202 +/-0.308 0.518 pCi/g Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Plutonium-238 U 0.0 0833 +/-0.0631 0.0462 +/-0.0631 0.173 pCi/g MXA 11/03/06 0749 584747 2 I

Plutonium-239/240 U 0.038 +/-0.0857 0.0461 +/-0.0857 0.173 pCi/g Liquid Scint Pu24/, Solid-ALL FSS Plutonium-241 U 3.26 +/-8.75 7.20 +/-8.76 15.1 pCi/g MXA 11/07/06 1034 584751 3 Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid-HTD2,ALL FSS Tritium U 2.02 +/-1.31 0.976 +/-1.31 2.09 pCi/g DFA I 11/07/06 1923 585989 5 Liquid Scint C14, SolidAllFSS Carbon-14 U - -0.15 +/-0.123 0.106 +/-0.123 0.216 pCi/g AXD2 11/03/06 0557 584648 8 Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Iron-55 U - -41.7 +/-38.2 29.7 +/-38.2 62.3 pCi/g MXPI 11/03/06 1545 584650 9 Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Nickel-63 U ( 0.631 +/-10.2 8.58 +/-10.2 17.8 pCi/g MXP1 11/06/06 1303 584649 10 Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Technetium-99 U ( 1.152 +/-0.261 0.215 +/-0.261 0.443 pCi/g KXRI 11/06/06 0747 584644 11 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 LXMI 11/01/06 1035 584675 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified 2 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-11-RC Modified 52

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.comr Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: November 8, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-021F Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 175290002 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd 3 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-1I-RC Modified 4 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-I -RC Modified 5 EPA 906.0 Modified 6 EPA 906.0 Modified 7 EPA 906.0 Modified 8 EPA EERF C-01 Modified 9 DOE RESL Fe-1, Modified 10 DOE RESL Ni-I, Modified II DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Americium-243 Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL 71 (15%-125%)

Plutonium-242 Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS 97 (15%- 125%)

Plutonium-241 Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FE 90 (25%-/125%)

Iron-55 Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FS 62 (15%-1I25%)

Nickel-63 Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FS 84 (25%-6125%)

Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FS 84 (25%- 125%

Technetium-99 Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FS 79 (15%-125%)

Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Tc99,. Solid-ALL FS 79 (15'/,125)

Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
  • Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GCiMS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier 53

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address : 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Report Date: November 8, 2006 Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: 9106-0007-021F Project: YANKO 1204 Sample ID: 175290002 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.:

Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Mtd Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.

54

QUALITY CONTROL DATA 55

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Renort Date: November 8, 2006 Client: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Page 1 of 8 362 Injun Hollow Rd East Hampton, Connecticut Contact: Mr. Jack McCarthy Workorder: 175290 P~armnn~im NYAM *rnnll. *i,. *I A C NOM nual Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Parmname Rad Alpha Spec Batch 584736 QC1201220182 175290001 DUP Americium-241 U 0.114 U 0.109 pCi/g 4 (0% - 100%) BXLI 11/04/06 09:51 Uncert: +/-0.191 +/-0.147 TPU: +/-0.191 +/-0.147 Curium-242 U 0.221 U -0.0494 pCi/g 315 (0% - 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.321 +/-0.0559 TPU: +/-0.322 +/-0.0562 Curium-243/244 U -0.0195 U -0.095 pCi/g 132 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.185 +/-0.168 TPU: +/-0.185 +/-0.168 QC1201220184 LCS Americium-241 13.1 13.5 pCi/g 103 (75%-125%) I 1/04/06 09:51 Uncert: +/-1.30 TPU: +/-2.10 Curium-242 U 0.0171 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0681 TPU: +/-0.0682 Curium-243/244 15.8 17.8 pCi/g 113 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +1-1.50 TPU: +/-2.63 QC1201220181 MB Americium-24 I U 0.0263 pCi/g 11/06/06 23:13 Uncert: +/-0.188 TPU: +/-0.188 Curium-242 U -0.0172 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.089 TPU: +/-0.089 Curium-243/244 U -0.0657 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.192 TPU: +/-0.193 QC1201220183 175290001 MS Americium-241 13.5 U 0.114 13.2 pCi/g 98 (75%-125%) 11/04/06 09:51 Uncert: +/-0.191 +/-1.21 TPU: +/-0.191 +/- 1.97 Curium-242 U 0.221 U 0.0515 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.32 I +/-0.226 TPU: +/-0.322 +/-0.226 Curium-243/244 16.6 U -0.0195 15.1 pCi/g 91 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.185 +/-1.31 TPU: +/-0.185 +/-2.21 Batch 584737 QC1201220186 175290001 DUP Plutonium-238 U 0.0828 U 0.0173 pCi/g 131 (0%- 100%) BXLI 11/04/06 09:51 56

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 175290 Page 2 of 8 Parmname NOM Samole Oual OC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Alpha Spec Batch 584737 Uncert: +/-0.114 +/-0.0689 TPU: +/-0.114 +/-0.0689 Plutonium-239/240 U -0.0236 U 0.0689 pCi/g 408 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0267 +/-0.137 TPU: +/-0.0268 +/-0.137 QC1201220188 LCS Plutonium-238 U 0.0761 pCi/g (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.117 TPU: +/-0.117 Plutonium-239/240 12.2 13.3 pCi/g 109 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-1.31 TPU: +/-2.08 QC1201220185 MB Plutonium-238 U 0.0169 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0672 TPU: +/-0.0672 Plutonium-239/240 U 0.122 pCilg Uncert: +/-0.128 TPU: +/-0.129 QC1201220187 175290001 MS Plutonium-238 U 0.0828 U 0.0756 pCilg (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.114 +/-0.116 TPU: +/-0.114 +/-0.116 Plutonium-239/240 12.5 U -0.0236 12.6 pCilg 101 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.0267 +/-1.26 TPU: +/-0.0268 +/-1.97 Batch 584743 QC1201220198 175290001 DUP Plutonium-241 HU 3.30 HU -0.222 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) BXLI 11/07/06 11:52 Uncert: +/-8.21 +/-7.72 TPU: +/-8.22 +/-7.72 QC1201220200 LCS Plutonium-241 141 124 pCi/g 88 (75%-125%) 11/07/06 12:25 Uncert: +/-12.8 TPU: +/-17.5 QC1201220197 MB Plutonium-241 -1.27 pCi/g 11/07/06 11:36 Uncert: +/-7.69 TPU: +/-7.69 QC1201220199 175290001 MS Plutonium-241 146 HU 3.30 131 pCi/g 90 (75%-125%) 11/07/06 12:08 Uncert: +/-8.21 +/-13.7 TPU: +/-8.22 +/-18.5 Batch 584744 QC1201220202 175290002 DUP Americium-241 U 0.0491 U -0.037 pCi/g 1420 (0% - 100%) IXAI 11/03/06 07:49 Uncert: +/-0.185 +/-0.122 TPU: +/-0.185 +/-0.122 Curium-242 U 0.134 U -0.0189 pCi/g 266 (0%- 100%)

57

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 175290 Page 3 of 8 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Alpha Spec Batch 584744 Uncert: +/-0.303 +/-0.159 TPU: +/-0.303 +/-0.159 Curium-243/244 U 0.224 U -0.0959 pCi/g 499 (0%- 100%)

Unceri: +/-0.307 +/-0.292 TPU: +/-0.308 +/-0.292 QC1201220204 LCS Americium-24 I 13.5 14.2 pCi/g 105 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-1.38 TPU: +/-2.23 Curium-242 U -0.0168 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0725 TPU: +/-0.0725 Curium-243/244 16.3 17.1 pCi/g 105 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-1.52 TPU: +/-2.60 QCI201220201 MB Americium-241 U -0.0992 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.126 TPU: +/-0.127 Curium-242 U 0.056 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.126 TPU: +/-0.127 Curium-243/244 U 0.00871 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.212 TPU: +/-0.212 QC1201220203 175290002 MS Americium-241 13.6 U 0.0491 12.8 pCi/g 94 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.185 +/-1.38 TPU: +/-0.185 +/-2.13 Curium-242 U 0.134 U 0.0501 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.303 +/-0.133 TPU: +/-0.303 +/-0.133 Curium-243/244 16.6 U 0.224 16.8 pCi/g 101 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.307 +/-1.58 TPU: +/-0.308 +/-2.65 Batch 584747 QC1201220219 175290002 DUP Plutonium-238 U 0.00833 U 0.00 pCi/g (0% - 100%) 4XA I 11/03/06 07:49 Uncert: +/-0.0631 +/-0.0586 TPU: +/-0.0631 +/-0.0586 Plutonium-239/240 U 0.038 U 0.00955 pCi/g 120 (0%- 100%)

Uncert: +/-0.0857 +/-0.0907 TPU: +/-0.0857 +/-0.0907 QC1201220221 LCS Plutonium-238 U 0.178 pCi/g (75%-1 25%) 11/03/06 07:49 Uncert: +/-0.266 TPU: +/-0.267 Plutonium-239/240 12.5 13.7 pCi/g 110 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-1.54 58

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 175290 Page 4 of 8 Parmn 2mo NOM Samnle Oual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Parmname NOM Rad Alpha Spec Batch 584747 TPU: +/-2.21 QCI201220218 MB Plutonium-238 U -0.00987 pCi/g 11/03/06 07:49 Uncert: +/-0.0829 TPU: +/-0.083 Plutonium-239/240 U -0.00987 pCi/g Uncert: +/-0.0829 TPU: +/-0.083 QC1201220220 175290002 MS Plutonium-238 U 0.00833 0.289 pCi/g (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.0631 +/-0.200 TPU: +/-0.0631 +/-0.203 Plutoniumn-239/240 12.6 U 0.038 11.0 pCi/g 87 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-0.0857 +/-1.20 TPU: +/-0.0857 +/-1.66 Batch 584751 QCI201220223 175290002 DUP Plutonium-241 U 3.26 U -2.83 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) 4AXAI 11/07/06 11:06 Uncert: +/-8.75 +/-7.80 TPU: +/-8.76 +/-7.80 QC1201220225 LCS Plutonium-24 I 143 142 pCi/g 99 (75%-125%) 11/07/06 11:39 Uncert: +/-19.1 TPU: +/-25.7 QC1201220222 MB Plutoniun-241 U -4.48 pCi/g 11/07/06 10:50 Uncert: +/-8.90 TPU: +/-8.90 QC0201220224 175290002 MS Plutoniumn-24 I 146 U 3.26 128 pCi/g 88 (75%-125%) 11/07/06 11:22 Uncert: +/-8.75 +/-13.8 TPU: +/-8.76 +/-19.2 Rad Liquid Scintillation Batch 584644 QC1201219906 175288015 DUP Technetium-99 U 0.0477 U -0.0932 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) KXRI 11/06/06 08:20 Uncert: +/-0.270 +/-0.255 TPU: +/-0.270 +/-0.255 QCI201219908 LCS Technetiumn-99 13.0 12.2 pCi/g 94 (75%-125%) 11/06/06 08:53 Uncert: +/-0.489 TPU: +/-0.576 QC1201219905 MB Technetium-99 U -0.00874 pCilg 11/06/06 08:03 Uncert: +/-0.231 TPU: +/-0.231 QC1201219907 175288015 MS Technetium-99 13.0 U 0.0477 12.2 pCilg 93 (75%-125%) 11/06/06 08:36 Uncert: +/-0.270 +1-0.513 59

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 175290 Page 5 of 8 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Liquid Scintillation Batch 584644 TPU: +/-0.270 +/-0.596 Batch 584648 QC1201219921 175288018 DUP Carbon-14 U -0.013 U -0.0381 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) NXD2 11/03/06 08:12 Uncert: +/-0.127 +/-0.119 TPU: +/-0.127 +/-0.119 QC1201219923 LCS Carbon- 14 6.74 6.38 pCi/g 95 (75%-125%) 11/03/06 09:27 Uncert: +/-0.376 TPU: +/-0.389 QC1201219920 MB Carbon- 14 U 0.0531 pCi/g 11/06/06 10:43 Uncert: +/-0.108 TPU: +/-0.108 QC1201219922 175288018 MS Carbon- 14 6.99 U -0.013 6.34 pCi/g 91 (75%-125%) 11/03/06 09:03 Uncert: +/-0.127 +/-0.319 TPU: +/-0. 127 +/-0.334 Batch 584649 QC1201219925 175288015 DUP Nickel-63 U -1.75 U 5.23 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) vIXPI 11/06/06 13:35 Uncert: +/-9.40 +/-9.62 TPU: +/-9.40 +/-9.62 QC1201219927 LCS Nickel-63 508 417 pCi/g 82 (75%-125%) 11/06/06 14:08 Uncert: +/-19.6 TPU: +/-24.3 QC1201219924 MB Nickel-63 U 3.97 pCi/g 11/06/06 13:19 Uncert: +/-9.36 TPU: +/-9.36 QC1201219926 175288015 MS Nickel-63 562 U -1.75 432 pCi/g 77 (75%-125%) 11/06/06 13:51 Uncert: +/-9.40 +/-20.1 TPU: +/-9.40 +/-25.4 Batch 584650 QC1201219929 175288015 DUP Iron-55 U -20.5 U -20 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) vIXPI 11/03/06 16:18 Uncert: +/-52.3 +/-32.0 TPU: +/-52.3 +/-32.0 QC1201219931 LCS Iron-55 587 573 98 (75%-125%) 11/03/06 16:51 Uncert: +/-46.4 TPU: +/-64.1 QC1201219928 MB Iron-55 U -11.8 pCi/g 11/03/06 16:02 Uncert: +/-27.9 TPU: +/-27.9 QC1201219930 175288015 MS 60

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 175290 Page 6 of 8 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Liquid Scintillation Batch 584650 Iron-55 632 U -20.5 610 pCi/g 97 (75%-125%)

Uncert: +/-52.3 +/-54.5 TPU: +/-52.3 +/-74.9 Batch 584687 QC1201220009 175290001 DUP Iron-55 U 28.0 U -8.23 pCi/g (0%- 100%) V1XPI 11/03/06 17:56 Uncert: +/-69.7 +/-47.4 TPU: +/-69.8 +/-47.4 QC1201220011 LCS Iron-55 616 651 pCilg 106 (75%-125%) 11/03/06 18:29 Uncert: +/-50.1 TPU: +/-71.4 QC1201220008 MB Iron-55 U 41.5 pCilg 11/03/06 17:40 Uncert: +/-30.5 TPU: +/-30.7 QC1201220010 175290001 MS Iron-55 733 U 28.0 739 pCilg 101 (75%-125%) 11/03/06 18:12 Uncert: +/-69.7 +/-75.3 TPU: +/-69.8 +/-104 Batch 584690 QC1201220017 175290001 DUP Nickel-63 HU -5.17 HU -1.5 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) v1XPI 11/06/06 17:12 Uncert: +/-8.15 +/-8.89 TPU: +/-8.15 +/-8.89 QC1201220019 LCS Nickel-63 498 479 pCi/g 96 (75%-125%) 11/06/06 17:45 Uncert: +/-22.0 TPU: +/-27.4 QC1201220016 MB Nickel-63 U -0.433 pCi/g 11/06/06 16:56 Uncert: +/-7.96 TPU: +/-7.96 QC1201220018 175290001 MS Nickel-63 528 HU -5.17 H 418 pCi/g 79 (75%-125%) I 1/06/06 17:28 Uncert: +/-8.15 +/-2 I .1 TPU: +/-8.15 +/-25.6 Batch 584692 QC1201220021 175290001 DUP Technetium-99 HU 0.290 HU 0.396 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) K.XR I 11/06/06 14:48 Uncert: +/-0.204 +/-0.272 TPU: +/-0.204 +/-0.272 QC1201220023 LCS Technetium-99 13.1 12.4 pCi/g 95 (75%-125%) 11/06/06 15:51 Uncert: +/-0.376 TPU: +/-0.487 QC1201220020 MB Technetium-99 U -0.114 pCi/g 11/06/06 14:16 61

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 175290 Page 7 of 8 Parmname NOM Sample Qual OC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Liquid Scintillation Batch 584692 Uncert: +/-0.176 TPU: +/-0.176 QC1201220022 175290001 MS Technetium-99 13.1 HU 0.290 H 12.5 pCi/g 95 (75%-125%) 11/06/06 15:20 Uncert: +/-0.204 +/-0.415 TPU: +/-0.204 +/-0.520 Batch 584693 QC1201220025 175290001 DUP Tritium U 5.01 U 1.03 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) DFA I 11/02/06 10:52 Uncert: +/-7.25 +/-5.25 TPU: +/-7.25 +/-5.25 QC1201220027 LCS Tritium 49.7 42.1 pCi/g 85 (75%-125%) 11/02/06 11:24 Uncert: +/-7.60 TPU: +/-7.64 QC1201220024 MB Tritium U 6.93 pCi/g 11/02/06 10:37 Uncert: +/-5.52 TPU: +/-5.52 QC1201220026 175290001 MS Tritium 51.1 U 5.01 52.8 pCi/g 103 (75%-125%) 11/02/06 11:08 Uncert: +/-7.25 +/-8.42 TPU: +/-7.25 +/-8.47 Batch 584694 QC1201220029 175290001 DUP Carbon- 14 U 0.136 U 0.191 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) %XD2 11/03/06 04:44 Uncert: +/-0.111 +/-0.119 TPU: +/-0.111 +/-0.119 QC1201220031 LCS Carbon-14 6.67 6.47 pCilg 97 (75%-125%) 11/03/06 06:19 Uncert: +/-0.225 TPU: +/-0.247 QC1201220028 MB Carbon- 14 U -0.027 pCilg 11/03/06 03:57 Uncert: +/-0.107 TPU: +/-0.107 QC1201220030 175290001 MS Carbon- 14 7.22 U 0.136 7.04 pCi/g 98 (75%-125%) 11/03/06 05:32 Uncert: +/-0.111 +/-0.245 TPU: +/-0.111 +/-0.268 Batch 585989 QC1201223382 175288015 DUP Tritium U 0.178 U -0.159 pCi/g 0 (0% - 100%) DFAI 11/07/06 21:28 Uncert: +/-0.744 +/-0.801 TPU: +/-0.744 +/-0.801 QC1201223384 LCS Tritium 20.2 18.5 pCi/g 92 (75%-125%) 11/07/06 22:48 Uncert: +/-3.05 TPU: +/-3.06 62

GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 175290 Page 8 of 8 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Liquid Scintillation Batch 585989 QC1201223381 MB Tritium U 0.326 pCi/g 11/07/06 20:25 Uncert: +/-0.728 TPU: +/-0.728 QC1201223383 175288015 MS Tritium 21.2 U 0.178 17.3 pCi/g 82 (75%-125%) 11/07/06 22:30 Uncert: +/-0.744 +/-3.22 TPU: +/-0.744 +/-3.23 Notes:

The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:

  • A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria

< Result is less than value reported

> Result is greater than value reported A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product B Target analyte was detected in the associated blank BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample H Analytical holding time was exceeded J Value is estimated N/A Spike recovery limits do not apply. Sample concentration exceeds spike concentration by 4X or more R Sample results are rejected U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.

UI Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier

  • QC Samples were not spiked with this compound A RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL h Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more.
    • Indicates analyte is a surrogate compound.

A The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptence criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/- the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.

For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.

Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.

63

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2b Split Sample Assessment Forms (2 Pages)

Connecticut Yankee Decommissioning Project Health 24265-000-GPR-GGGR-R5124-000 Attachment A Physics Procedure Split Sample Assessment Form Survey Area Survey 0007 Survey Discharge Canal

  1. 9106 Unit#: Unit Name:

Sample Plan or WPIR#: 2006-02 1 SML #: 9106-0007-004 Sample

Description:

Comparison of split samples collected from sample measurement location #04 and analyzec using gamma spectroscopy by an off-site vendor laboratory. The standard sample was 9106-0007-004F the comparison sample was 9106-0007-004FS.

STANDARD COMPARISON Radionuclide Activity Standard Resolution Agreement Activity Standard Comparison Acceptable (Y/N)

Value Error Range Value Error Ratio Cs-137 9.66E-03 1.32E-02 1 NONE- 5.74E-03 9.60E-03 0.59 N/A Co-60 3.42E-02 1.50E-02 2 NONE- 6.27E-02 1.18E-02 1.83 N/A Sr-90 -6.42E-03 7.70E-03 -1 NONE- 5.85E-03 8.95E-03 -0.91 N/A K-40 1.41E+01 5.60E-01 25 0.75 1.33 1.13E+01 3.75E-01 0.80 Y Comments/Corrective Actions: In consideration of Cs-137, Co- Table is provided to show acceptance criteria used 60 & Sr-90 results, guidance for agreement ranges, obtained to assess split samples.

from USNRC Inspection Procedure 84750, does not address resolution ratios less than 4, therefore, a determination of Resolution Agreement Range acceptability for such ratios is not appropriate. Since K-40 was 4 7 0.50 2.00 found to be present at an acceptable level of agreement, no 8 15 0.60 1.66 further action is warranted. 16 50 0.75 1.33 51 200 0.80 1.25

> 200 0.85 1.18 viewed By: Date:

WPIR - Work Plan and Inspection Record SML - Sample Measurement Location designation Page I of I

Connecticut Yankee Decommissioning Project Health 24265-000-GPR-GGGR-R5124-000 Attachment A Physics Procedure Split Sample Assessment Form Survey 9106 Survey 0007 Survey Unit Discharge Canal Area#: Unit #: Name:

Sample Plan or WPIR#: 2006-0021 SML #: 9106-0007-013 Sample

Description:

Comparison of split samples collected from sample measurement location #13 and analyzed using gamma spectroscopy by an off-site vendor laboratory. The standard sample was 9106-0007-013F, the comparison sample was 9106-0007-0133FS.

STANDARD COMPARISON Radionuclide Activity Standard Resolution Agreement Activity Standard Comparison Acceptable (Y/N)

Value Error Range Value Error Ratio Cs-137 2.21E-02 1.25E-02 2 N/A 2.01E-02 1.18E-02 0.91 N/A Co-60 1.86E-02 1.11E-02 2 N/A 1.27E-02 1.14E-02 0.68 N/A Sr-90 -9.81E-03 5.75E-03 -2 N/A 2.91E-03 5.10E-03 -0.30 N/A K-40 1.94E+01 4.29E-01 45 0.75 1.33 2.06E+01 7.40E-01 1.06 Y Comments/Corrective Actions: In consideration of Cs-137, Co- Table is provided to show acceptance criteria used 60 & Sr-90 results, guidance for agreement ranges, obtained to assess split samples.

from USNRC Inspection Procedure 84750, does not address resolution ratios less than 4, therefore, a determination of Resolution Agreement Range acceptability for such ratios is not appropriate. Since K-40 was 4 7 0.50 2.00 found to be present at an acceptable level of agreement, no 8 15 0.60 1.66 further action is warranted. 16 50 0.75 1.33 51 200 0.80 1.25

> 200 0.85 1.18 Performed By: Date: Reviewed B Date:

WPIR - Work Plan and Inspection Record SML - Sample Measurement Location designation Page I of I

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2c Prel imi nary Data Forms (1 Page)

Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R512 1-001 Attachment B, Rev. CY-00 I MAJOR Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5 121-001 Attachment B, Rev. CY-0O I MAJOR Preliminary Data Review Form - Samples for the Sign Test Survey Unit: 9106- 0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Classification: 2 Survey Media: Soil Type of Survey: Final Status Survey Type of Measurement: Radionuclide Specific Number of Measurements: 15 Operational DCGL: 1 BASIC STATISTICAL QUANTITIES Cs-137 Co-60 Sr-90 Minimum Value: -1.62E-02 -1.89E-02 -9.81E-03 Maximum Value: 5.38E-01 1.10E+00 4.04E-02 Mean: 2.13E-01 2.17E-01 7.51E-03 Median: 1.98E-01 4.96E-02 5.58E-03 Standard Deviation: 1.96E-01 3.06E-0I 1.23E-02 RADIONUCLIDE CONCENTRATION (pCi/g)

NUMBER Cs-137 Co-60 Sr-90 Identified? Identified? Identified?

9106-0007-001 F 3.20E-02 4.96E-02 5.58E-03 Y Y N 9106-0007-002F 4.41 E-01 2.79E-02 3.43E-03 Y N N 9106-0007-003 F 1.98E-01 -1.89E-02 1.12E-02 Y N N 9106-0007-004F 9.66E-03 3.42E-02 -6.42E-03 N Y N 9106-0007-005 F 5.38E-01 1.90E-01 4.04E-02 Y Y Y 9106-0007-007F 2.51 E-01 4.31 E-01 4.74E-03 Y Y N 9106-0007-01 IF 2.26E-01 3.14E-01 8.57E-03 Y Y N 9106-0007-012F -1.62E-02 -1.46E-02 8.97E-03 N N N 9106-0007-013F 2.21 E-02 1.86E-02 -9.81 E-03 N N N 9106-0007-014F 3.94E-01 1.10 E+00 3.92E-03 Y Y N 9106-0007-015F 2.32E-02 1.35E-02 7.39E-03 N N N 9106-0007-018F 1.620E-02 8.1 OOE-03 1.760E-02 N N N 9106-0007-019F 1.82E-01 3.96E-01 -2.18E-03 Y Y N 91 06-0007-020F 4.82E-01 1.65E-01 2.15E-02 Y Y Y 9106-0007-021 F 3.94E-01 5.43E-01 -2.21 E-03 Y Y N Performed By: (%~( Date: 10-31-04 Independent Review: Date:

1000o, 4ýL-

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2d Graphical Representation of Data (6 Pages)

Health Physics Procedure GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Quantile Plot For Cesium - 137 Survey Unit: 9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean: 2.29E-01 pCi/g Cs-1 37 Rank Percentage

-1.62E-02 1 3 %

9.66E-03 2 10 %

1.62E-02 3 17 %

2.21 E-02 4 23 %

2.32E-02 5 30 %

3.20E-02 6 37 %

1.82E-01 7 43 %

1.98E-01 8 50 %

2.26E-01 9 57 %

2.51E-01 10 63 %

3.94E-01 11 70 %

3.94E-01 12 77 %

4.41 E-01 13 83 %

4.82E-01 14 90 %

5.38E-01 15 97 %

Prepared By: 62/ 2~Z~ Date:__________

Reviewed By: Date:

/ ',

Health Physics Procedure GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Quantile Plot For Cobalt - 60 Survey Unit: 9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean: 2.45E-01 pCi/g Co-60 Rank Percentage

-1.89E-02 1 3 %

-1.46E-02 2 10 %

8.10E-03 3 17 %

1.35E-02 4 23 %

1.86E-02 5 30 %

2.79E-02 6 37 %

3.42E-02 7 43 %

4.96E-02 8 50 %

1.65E-01 9 57 %

1.90E-01 10 63 %

3.14E-01 11 70 %

3.96E-01 12 77 %

4.31 E-01 13 83 %

5.43E-01 14 90 %

1.1OE+00 15 97 %

Prepared By: eý)4,z Date: - '/

  • Reviewed By: Date:

Health Physics Procedure GGGR-R5123 -Rev. CY-00 I Attachment C Quantile Plot For Strontium - 90 Survey Unit: 9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean: 6.65E-03 pCi/g 5.OOE-02 4.OOE-02 3.OOE-02 r0 2.OOE-02

. 1.OOE-02 _

" 0.OOE+00 0

O 20 40 60 80 10

-1.OOE-02

-2.PeE-02 Percentage Sr-90 Rank Percentage

-9.81 E-03 1 3 %

-6.42E-03 2 10 %

-2.21E-03 3 17 %

-2.18E-03 4 23 %

3.43E-03 5 30 %

3.92E-03 6 37 %

4.74E-03 7 43 %

5.58E-03 8 50 %

7.39E-03 9 57 %

8.57E-03 10 63 %

8.97E-03 11 70 %

1.12E-02 12 77 %

1.76E-02 13 83 %

2.15E-02 14 90 %

4.04E-02 15 97 %

Prepared By: Date: 1'-3. {-0d Reviewed By: Date:

Health Physics Procedure GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Frequency Plot For Cs - 137 Survey Unit: 9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean: 0.229 pCi/g 6

5-W 4-0 3-Cr U.

2-1-

0-0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 Upper End Value (pCilg)

Upper End Observation Observation %

Value Frequency Frequency 0.00 1 7%

0.10 5 33%

0.20 2 13%

0.30 2 13%

0.40 2 13%

0.50 2 13%

0.60 1 7%

Total 15 100%

Prepared By: Date: -16P- 5Y - Ot Reviewed By:-Date: Date: A54 ,e/leey,

Health Physics Procedure GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Frequency Plot For Co - 60 Survey Unit: 9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean: 0.245 pCi/g Upper End Observation Observation %

Value Frequency Frequency 0.00 2 13%

0.25 8 53%

0.50 3 20%

0.75 1 7%

1.00 0 0%

1.25 1 7%

Total 15 100%

Prepared By: 5ej x "- " Zo-// Date: t" 40- R *-?!

~2~Q Reviewed By: Reviewed By: Date: /

Date:-/04//e79- ~ ~

ell /

Health Physics Procedure GGGR-R5123-Rev.CY-001 Attachment C Frequency Plot For Sr - 90 Survey Unit: 9106-0007 Survey Unit Name: Discharge Canal Mean: 0.008 pCi/g 8-

.4 -

3m.m.

0*

0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 Upper End Value (pCi/g)

Upper End Observation Observation %

Value Frequency Frequency 0.00 4 27%

0.01 7 47%

0.02 2 13%

0.03 1 7%

0.04 0 0%

0.05 1 7%

Total 15 100%

Prepared By: Date: 10-31-0 2~W~4t~

Reviewed By: Date: / 5/ '

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2e Sign Test Calculation (1 Page)

Health Physics Procedure OPP-GGGR-R5]2 1-000 Attachment A. Rev. CY-00 I MAJOR Sign Test Calculation Sheet For Multiple Radionuclisdes

urvey Unit Number. Survey Media

Survey Unit Name: 9106-0007 WP&IR#: 2006-021 Classification : 2 TYPE I (a error):0.05 TYPE I (b error):0.05 Radionuclides: Cs-137 Co-60 Sr-90 Survey Design DCGL (pCi/g): 6.01 2.90 1.18 Results Cs-137 Results Co-60 Results Sr-90 Weighted Sum (W,) DCGL-Result Sign 3.20E-02 4.96E-02 5.58E-03 2.72E-02 9.73E-01 1 4.41E-01 2.79E-02 3.43E-03 8.59E-02 9.14E-01 I 1.98E-0I -1.89E-02 1.12E-02 3.59E-02 9.64E-01 1 9.66E-03 3.42E-02 -6.42E-03 7.97E-03 9.92E-01 I 5.38E-01 1.90E-01 4.04E-02 1.89E-01 8.11E-01 1 2.51E-01 4.31E-01 4.74E-03 1.95E-01 8.05E-01 I 2.26E-01 3.14E-01 8.57E-03 1.53E-01 8.47E-01 1

-1.62E-02 -1.46E-02 8.97E-03 -1.22E-04 1.OOE+00 1 2.21E-02 1.86E-02 -9.81E-03 1.77E-03 9.98E-01 1 3.94E-01 1.10E+00 3.92E-03 4.49E-01 5.51 E-01 1 2.32E-02 1.35E-02 7.39E-03 1.48E-02 9.85E-01 I 1.62E-02 8.1OE-03 1.76E-02 2.04E-02 9.80E-01 1 1.82E-01 3.96E-01 -2.18E-03 1.65E-01 8.35E-01 I 4.82E-01 1.65E-01 2.15E-02 1.55E-01 8.45E-01 1 3.94E-01 5.43 E-01 -2.21E-03 2.51E-01 7.49E-01 1 Number of Positive Differences (S+): 15 Critical Value: 11 Survey Unit: Meets Acceptance Criterion Performed By:_____ ____ ____ Date: / I2,t/Q-/0 ndependent Review: _ _ _ _ _ _Date: _ ,_, __ __

Page 1 of I

DISCHARGE CANAL SURVEY UNIT 9106-0007 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2f COMPASS DQA Surface Soil Report with Retrospective Power Curve (3 Pages)

DQA Surface Soil Report Assessment Summary Site: 9106-0007 (19 mrem/yr)

Planner(s): Dale Randall Survey Unit Name: 9106-0007 Report Number: 1 Survey Unit Samples: 15 Reference Area Samples: 0 Test Performed: Sign Test Result: Not Performed Judgmental Samples: 0 EMC Result: Not Performed Assessment

Conclusion:

Reject Null Hypothesis (Survey Unit PASSES)

Retrospective Power Curve

., I I 0.9

, 0.8 -- il- -

. 0.7  ;!' - ,---

-"11- _I 1 i

  • 0.6

_ 1 0.5 1!11 I=

-:1 ___

S0.4 S0.3 P: 0.2 ff"izz_

Z 0.1

=-0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Unity Rule Sumt-of-Ratios, including background

- - Prospective Power U I-beta .... Actual Power LBGR - - Estimated Power DCGL --- Retrospective Power

.0.0 1111/2006 Page 1 COMPASS vi COMPASS v0.0.0 1111/2006 Page I

DQA Surface Soil Report Survey Unit Data NOTE: Type = "S"indicates survey unit sample.

Type = "R" indicates reference area sample.

Sample Number Type Co-60 (pCi/g) Cs-137 (pCi/g) SrY-90 (pCi/g) 9106-0007-001F S 0.05 0.03 0.01 9106-0007-002F S 0.03 0.44 0 9106-0007-003F S -0.02 0.2 0.01 9106-0007-004F S 0.03 0.01 -0.01 9106-0007-005F S 0.19 0.54 0.04 9106-0007-007F S 0.43 0.25 0 9106-0007-011 F S 0.31 0.23 0.01 9106-0007-012F S -0.01 -0.02 0.01 9106-0007-013F S 0.02 0.02 -0.01 9106-0007-014F S 1.1 0.39 0 9106-0007-015F S 0.01 0.02 0.01 9106-0007-018F S 0.01 0.02 0.02 9106-0007-019F S 0.4 0.18 0 9106-0007-020F S 0.16 0.48 0.02 9106-0007-021 F S 0.54 0.39 0 Modified Data (Unity Rule SOR)

NOTE: Type = "S"indicates survey unit sample.

Type = "R" indicates reference area sample.

Sample Number Type Sum-of-Ratios (SOR) 9106-0007-001 F S 0.03 9106-0007-002F S 0.09 9106-0007-003F S 0.04 9106-0007-004F S 0.01 9106-0007-005F S 0.19 9106-0007-007F S 0.19 9106-0007-01 IF S 0.15 9106-0007-012F S 0 9106-0007-013F S 0 9106-0007-014F S 0.45 9106-0007-015F S 0.01 9106-0007-018F S 0.02 9106-0007-019F S 0.16 9106-0007-020F S 0.16 9106-0007-021 F S 0.25 COMPASS v1.0.0 111112006 Page 2

' DQA Surface Soil Report Basic Statistical Quantities Summary Statistic Survey Unit Background DQO Results Sample Number 15 N/A N=13 Mean (SOR) 0.12 N/A 0.11 Median (SOR) 0.09 N/A N/A Std Dev (SOR) 0.12 N/A 0.07 High Value (SOR) 0.45 N/A N/A Low Value (SOR) 0.00 N/A N/A COMPASS vl.0.0 111112006 Page 3

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML063400442&oldid=2183530"