ML092450624: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:September 3, 2009 EA-09-167  
{{#Wiki_filter:September 3, 2009
Mr. Mark A. Schimmel Acting Site Vice President
EA-09-167
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant  
Mr. Mark A. Schimmel
Northern States Power Company - Minnesota  
Acting Site Vice President
1717 Wakonade Drive East
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant
Welch, MN 55089 SUBJECT: FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION FOR A WHITE FINDING AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION; NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000306/2009013;  
Northern States Power Company - Minnesota
PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 2 Dear Mr. Schimmel:  
1717 Wakonade Drive East
The purpose of this letter is to provide you the final results of our significance determination of the preliminary White finding identified in Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010.  
Welch, MN 55089
The inspection finding was assessed using the Significance Determination Process and was  
SUBJECT:         FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION FOR A WHITE FINDING AND
preliminarily characterized as White, a finding with low to moderate increased importance to  
                NOTICE OF VIOLATION; NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000306/2009013;
safety that may require additional U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspections. This  
                PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 2
White finding is associated with the licensee's failure to design the component cooling water  
Dear Mr. Schimmel:
system such that it would be protected from the impact of a high energy line break, seismic, or  
The purpose of this letter is to provide you the final results of our significance determination of the
tornado events. In a telephone conversation with Mr. Steven West of the NRC Region III office, on August 10, 2009, Mr. Michael Wadley, former Site Vice President, indicated that Northern States  
preliminary White finding identified in Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010.
Power Company - Minnesota did not contest the characterization of the risk significance of this  
The inspection finding was assessed using the Significance Determination Process and was
finding and that Northern States Power Company - Minnesota declined the opportunity to discuss  
preliminarily characterized as White, a finding with low to moderate increased importance to
this issue in a regulatory conference or to provide a written response. After considering the information developed during the inspection, the NRC has concluded that the inspection finding is appropriately characterized as White, a finding with low to moderate  
safety that may require additional U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspections. This
increased importance to safety that may require additional NRC inspections as stated in  
White finding is associated with the licensees failure to design the component cooling water
Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010. The NRC has also determined that the finding is a violation of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III, "Design Control," as cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice). The  
system such that it would be protected from the impact of a high energy line break, seismic, or
circumstances surrounding the violation were described in detail in the subject inspection report. In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the Notice is considered escalated enforcement action because it is associated with a White finding. The NRC has concluded that the information regarding the reason for the violation, the corrective actions taken, and the date when full compliance was achieved is already adequately addressed  
tornado events.
on the docket in the subject inspection report. Therefore, you are not required to respond to this  
In a telephone conversation with Mr. Steven West of the NRC Region III office, on
letter unless the description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your  
August 10, 2009, Mr. Michael Wadley, former Site Vice President, indicated that Northern States
position.
Power Company - Minnesota did not contest the characterization of the risk significance of this
M. Schimmel -2- As a result of our review of Prairie Island Unit 2's performance, including this White finding, we have assessed you to be in the Regulatory Response column of the NRC's Action Matrix.
finding and that Northern States Power Company - Minnesota declined the opportunity to discuss
Therefore, we plan to conduct a supplemental inspection using Inspection Procedure 95001,  
this issue in a regulatory conference or to provide a written response.
"Inspection for One or Two White Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area," when your staff has  
After considering the information developed during the inspection, the NRC has concluded that
notified us of your readiness for this inspection. This inspection procedure is conducted to  
the inspection finding is appropriately characterized as White, a finding with low to moderate
provide assurance that the root cause and contributing causes of risk significant performance  
increased importance to safety that may require additional NRC inspections as stated in
issues are understood, the extent of condition is identified, and the corrective actions are  
Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010.
sufficient to prevent recurrence. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response, if you choose to provide one, will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC
The NRC has also determined that the finding is a violation of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B,
=s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made  
Criterion III, Design Control, as cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice). The
available to the public without redaction. Sincerely, /RA by Cynthia D. Pederson Acting for/ Mark A. Satorius Regional Administrator Docket No. 50-306 License No. DPR-60 Enclosure: Notice of Violation cc w/encl: D. Koehl, Chief Nuclear Officer   G. Salamon, Regulatory Affairs Manager  
circumstances surrounding the violation were described in detail in the subject inspection report.
  P. Glass, Assistant General Counsel  
In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the Notice is considered escalated enforcement
  Nuclear Asset Manager  
action because it is associated with a White finding.
  J. Stine, State Liaison Officer, Minnesota Department of Health  
The NRC has concluded that the information regarding the reason for the violation, the corrective
  Tribal Council, Prairie Island Indian Community  
actions taken, and the date when full compliance was achieved is already adequately addressed
  Administrator, Goodhue County Courthouse  
on the docket in the subject inspection report. Therefore, you are not required to respond to this
  Commissioner, Minnesota Department  
letter unless the description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your
    of Commerce  
position.
  Manager, Environmental Protection Division  
 
    Office of the Attorney General of Minnesota  
M. Schimmel                                     -2-
  Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Dakota  
As a result of our review of Prairie Island Unit 2s performance, including this White finding, we
    County Law Enforcement Center  
have assessed you to be in the Regulatory Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix.
 
Therefore, we plan to conduct a supplemental inspection using Inspection Procedure 95001,
M. Schimmel -3-  
Inspection for One or Two White Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area, when your staff has
As a result of our review of Prairie Island Unit 2's performance, including this White finding, we have assessed you to be in the Regulatory Response column of the NRC's Action Matrix. Therefore, we plan to conduct a supplemental inspection using Inspection Procedure 95001, "Inspection for One or Two White  
notified us of your readiness for this inspection. This inspection procedure is conducted to
Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area," when your staff has notified us of your readiness for this  
provide assurance that the root cause and contributing causes of risk significant performance
inspection. This inspection procedure is conducted to provide assurance that the root cause and  
issues are understood, the extent of condition is identified, and the corrective actions are
contributing causes of risk significant performance issues are understood, the extent of condition is  
sufficient to prevent recurrence.
identified, and the corrective actions are sufficient to prevent recurrence. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response, if you choose to provide one, will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its
=s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards  
enclosure, and your response, if you choose to provide one, will be made available electronically
information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction. Sincerely,
for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC=s Agencywide
/RA by Cynthia D. Pederson Acting for/ Mark A. Satorius Regional Administrator Docket No. 50-306 License No. DPR-60 Enclosure: Notice of Violation cc w/encl: D. Koehl, Chief Nuclear Officer   G. Salamon, Regulatory Affairs Manager  
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at
  P. Glass, Assistant General Counsel  
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To the extent possible, your response should not
  Nuclear Asset Manager  
include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made
  J. Stine, State Liaison Officer, Minnesota Department of Health  
available to the public without redaction.
  Tribal Council, Prairie Island Indian Community  
                                                Sincerely,
  Administrator, Goodhue County Courthouse  
                                                /RA by Cynthia D. Pederson Acting for/
  Commissioner, Minnesota Department  
                                                Mark A. Satorius
    of Commerce  
                                                Regional Administrator
  Manager, Environmental Protection Division  
Docket No. 50-306
    Office of the Attorney General of Minnesota  
License No. DPR-60
  Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Dakota  
Enclosure:
    County Law Enforcement Center DISTRIBUTION
Notice of Violation
: See next page FILE NAME: G:\EICS\ENFORCEMENT\Enforcement Cases 2009\EA-09-167 Prairie Island CCW\EA-09-167 Prairie Island Draft Final Action.doc  
cc w/encl:       D. Koehl, Chief Nuclear Officer
  Publicly Available     Non-Sensitive OFFICE RIII RIII RIII D:OE RIII RIII NAME Lougheed Giessner West Bowman for Carpenter 1 Orth Pederson forSatorius DATE 09/01/09 09/01/09 09/01/09 08/31/09 09/01/09 09/02/09 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                                              
                G. Salamon, Regulatory Affairs Manager
1. OE concurrence received via e-mail from G. Gulla on August 31, 2009.
                P. Glass, Assistant General Counsel
Letter to Mark A. Schimmel from Mark A. Satorius dated September 3, 2009 SUBJECT: FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION FOR A WHITE FINDING AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION; NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000306/2009013;  
                Nuclear Asset Manager
PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 2  
                J. Stine, State Liaison Officer, Minnesota Department of Health
DISTRIBUTION
                Tribal Council, Prairie Island Indian Community
: ADAMS (PARS)  
                Administrator, Goodhue County Courthouse
RidsSecyMailCenter  
                Commissioner, Minnesota Department
OCADistribution  
                  of Commerce
Bill Borchardt  
                Manager, Environmental Protection Division
Bruce Mallett  
                  Office of the Attorney General of Minnesota
Cynthia Carpenter  
                Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Dakota
Nick Hilton  
                  County Law Enforcement Center
Marvin Itzkowitz  
 
Catherine Marco  
M. Schimmel                                           -3-
Eric Leeds  
As a result of our review of Prairie Island Unit 2s performance, including this White finding, we have
Bruce Boger  
assessed you to be in the Regulatory Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix. Therefore, we plan to
Mark Satorius  
conduct a supplemental inspection using Inspection Procedure 95001, Inspection for One or Two White
Cynthia Pederson  
Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area, when your staff has notified us of your readiness for this
Steven West  
inspection. This inspection procedure is conducted to provide assurance that the root cause and
Daniel Holody  
contributing causes of risk significant performance issues are understood, the extent of condition is
Carolyn Evans  
identified, and the corrective actions are sufficient to prevent recurrence.
William Jones Steven Orth  
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and
Jared Heck  
your response, if you choose to provide one, will be made available electronically for public inspection in
Ross Moore  
the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC=s Agencywide Documents Access and Management
Mary Ann Ashley  
System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To
Holly Harrington  
the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards
Hubert Bell  
information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction.
Guy Caputo  
                                                    Sincerely,
Mona W illiams Allan Barker  
                                                    /RA by Cynthia D. Pederson Acting for/
James Lynch  
                                                    Mark A. Satorius
Viktoria Mitlyng  
                                                    Regional Administrator
Prema Chandrathil  
Docket No. 50-306
Paul Pelke  
License No. DPR-60
Patricia Lougheed  
Enclosure:
Jeannie Choe  
Notice of Violation
Linda Linn  
cc w/encl:           D. Koehl, Chief Nuclear Officer
Monte Phillips  
                      G. Salamon, Regulatory Affairs Manager
John Giessner  
                      P. Glass, Assistant General Counsel
Susan Bagley  
                      Nuclear Asset Manager
RidsNrrPMPrairieIsland  
                      J. Stine, State Liaison Officer, Minnesota Department of Health
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource  
                      Tribal Council, Prairie Island Indian Community
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource  
                      Administrator, Goodhue County Courthouse
                      Commissioner, Minnesota Department
                        of Commerce
                      Manager, Environmental Protection Division
                        Office of the Attorney General of Minnesota
                      Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Dakota
                        County Law Enforcement Center
DISTRIBUTION:
See next page
FILE NAME: G:\EICS\ENFORCEMENT\Enforcement Cases 2009\EA-09-167 Prairie Island CCW\EA-09-
167 Prairie Island Draft Final Action.doc
; Publicly Available ; Non-Sensitive
OFFICE       RIII           RIII           RIII           D:OE         RIII           RIII
NAME         Lougheed       Giessner       West           Bowman for   Orth           Pederson for
                                                                        1
                                                              Carpenter                    Satorius
DATE         09/01/09       09/01/09       09/01/09       08/31/09     09/01/09       09/02/09
                                        OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
1. OE concurrence received via e-mail from G. Gulla on August 31, 2009.
 
Letter to Mark A. Schimmel from Mark A. Satorius dated September 3, 2009
SUBJECT:       FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION FOR A WHITE FINDING AND
                NOTICE OF VIOLATION; NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000306/2009013;
                PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 2
DISTRIBUTION:
ADAMS (PARS)
RidsSecyMailCenter
OCADistribution
Bill Borchardt
Bruce Mallett
Cynthia Carpenter
Nick Hilton
Marvin Itzkowitz
Catherine Marco
Eric Leeds
Bruce Boger
Mark Satorius
Cynthia Pederson
Steven West
Daniel Holody
Carolyn Evans
William Jones
Steven Orth
Jared Heck
Ross Moore
Mary Ann Ashley
Holly Harrington
Hubert Bell
Guy Caputo
Mona Williams
Allan Barker
James Lynch
Viktoria Mitlyng
Prema Chandrathil
Paul Pelke
Patricia Lougheed
Jeannie Choe
Linda Linn
Monte Phillips
John Giessner
Susan Bagley
RidsNrrPMPrairieIsland
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
ROPreports Resource
ROPreports Resource
OEMAIL Resource  
OEMAIL Resource
OEWEB Resource
OEWEB Resource
  ENCLOSURE NOTICE OF VIOLATION Northern States Power Company - Minnesota Docket No. 50-306 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 2 License No. DPR-60


EA-09-167 During a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted from June 15 to July 9, 2009, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC  
                                        NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below: Title 10 of the Code of Feder
Northern States Power Company - Minnesota                                      Docket No. 50-306
al Regulations, Part 50, Appendix B, Cr
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 2                                License No. DPR-60
iterion III, "Design Control," requires, in part, that measures be established to assure that the design basis  
                                                                              EA-09-167
for safety-related functions of structures, systems, and components are correctly  
During a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted from June 15 to
translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions. Further,  
July 9, 2009, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC
Criterion III require
Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below:
s that the design control measures provide for verifying or checking the adequacy of designs. Contrary to the above, as of July 29, 2008, the licensee failed to implement design control measures to ensure that the design basis for the component cooling water  
        Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III, Design
system was correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and  
        Control, requires, in part, that measures be established to assure that the design basis
instructions. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure that the safety-related function of  
        for safety-related functions of structures, systems, and components are correctly
the component cooling water system was maintained following a high energy line break,  
        translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions. Further,
seismic, or tornado events in the turbine building. This violation is associated with a White finding.  
        Criterion III requires that the design control measures provide for verifying or checking
The NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason for the violation, the corrective actions taken and planned to be taken to correct the violation and to prevent recurrence, and the  
        the adequacy of designs.
date when full compliance was achieved, is already adequately addressed on the docket in  
        Contrary to the above, as of July 29, 2008, the licensee failed to implement design
Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010, dated August 5, 2009. However,  
        control measures to ensure that the design basis for the component cooling water
you are required to submit a written statement or explanation pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 if the  
        system was correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and
description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that  
        instructions. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure that the safety-related function of
case, or if you choose to respond, clearly mark your response as a "Reply to a Notice of  
        the component cooling water system was maintained following a high energy line break,
Violation EA-09-167," and send it to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,  
        seismic, or tornado events in the turbine building.
ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001 with a copy to the Regional  
This violation is associated with a White finding.
The NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason for the violation, the corrective
actions taken and planned to be taken to correct the violation and to prevent recurrence, and the
date when full compliance was achieved, is already adequately addressed on the docket in
Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010, dated August 5, 2009. However,
you are required to submit a written statement or explanation pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 if the
description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that
case, or if you choose to respond, clearly mark your response as a "Reply to a Notice of
Violation EA-09-167," and send it to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001 with a copy to the Regional
Administrator, Region III, 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210, Lisle IL 60532, and a copy to the
NRC Resident Inspector at the Prairie Island facility, within 30 days of the date of the letter
transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).
If you contest this enforcement action, you should also provide a copy of your response, with the
basis for your denial, to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001.
If you choose to respond, your response will be made available electronically for public
inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at
                                                                                        ENCLOSURE


Administrator, Region III, 2443 Warrenville Road, Su
Notice of Violation                             -2-
ite 210, Lisle IL 60532, and a copy to the
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Therefore, to the extent possible, the response
NRC Resident Inspector at the Prairie Island facility, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). If you contest this enforcement action, you should also provide a copy of your response, with the basis for your denial, to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be
Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001. If you choose to respond, your response will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's Agencywide Documents
made available to the public without redaction.
Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at 
In accordance with 10 CFR 19.11, you may be required to post this Notice within two working
Notice of Violation -2-  
days.
ENCLOSURE http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Therefore, to the extent possible, the response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be  
Dated this 3rd day of September 2009
made available to the public without redaction. In accordance with 10 CFR 19.11, you may be required to post this Notice within two working days. Dated this 3
                                                                                    ENCLOSURE
rd day of September 2009
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 03:34, 14 November 2019

EA-09-167, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 2, Final Significance Determination for a White Finding and Notice of Violation, NRC Inspection Report No. 05000306-09-013
ML092450624
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/03/2009
From: Satorius M
Region 3 Administrator
To: Schimmel M
Northern States Power Co
References
EA-09-167, IR-09-013 EA-09-167
Download: ML092450624 (6)


See also: IR 05000306/2009013

Text

September 3, 2009

EA-09-167

Mr. Mark A. Schimmel

Acting Site Vice President

Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant

Northern States Power Company - Minnesota

1717 Wakonade Drive East

Welch, MN 55089

SUBJECT: FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION FOR A WHITE FINDING AND

NOTICE OF VIOLATION; NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000306/2009013;

PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 2

Dear Mr. Schimmel:

The purpose of this letter is to provide you the final results of our significance determination of the

preliminary White finding identified in Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010.

The inspection finding was assessed using the Significance Determination Process and was

preliminarily characterized as White, a finding with low to moderate increased importance to

safety that may require additional U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspections. This

White finding is associated with the licensees failure to design the component cooling water

system such that it would be protected from the impact of a high energy line break, seismic, or

tornado events.

In a telephone conversation with Mr. Steven West of the NRC Region III office, on

August 10, 2009, Mr. Michael Wadley, former Site Vice President, indicated that Northern States

Power Company - Minnesota did not contest the characterization of the risk significance of this

finding and that Northern States Power Company - Minnesota declined the opportunity to discuss

this issue in a regulatory conference or to provide a written response.

After considering the information developed during the inspection, the NRC has concluded that

the inspection finding is appropriately characterized as White, a finding with low to moderate

increased importance to safety that may require additional NRC inspections as stated in

Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010.

The NRC has also determined that the finding is a violation of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B,

Criterion III, Design Control, as cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice). The

circumstances surrounding the violation were described in detail in the subject inspection report.

In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the Notice is considered escalated enforcement

action because it is associated with a White finding.

The NRC has concluded that the information regarding the reason for the violation, the corrective

actions taken, and the date when full compliance was achieved is already adequately addressed

on the docket in the subject inspection report. Therefore, you are not required to respond to this

letter unless the description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your

position.

M. Schimmel -2-

As a result of our review of Prairie Island Unit 2s performance, including this White finding, we

have assessed you to be in the Regulatory Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix.

Therefore, we plan to conduct a supplemental inspection using Inspection Procedure 95001,

Inspection for One or Two White Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area, when your staff has

notified us of your readiness for this inspection. This inspection procedure is conducted to

provide assurance that the root cause and contributing causes of risk significant performance

issues are understood, the extent of condition is identified, and the corrective actions are

sufficient to prevent recurrence.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its

enclosure, and your response, if you choose to provide one, will be made available electronically

for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC=s Agencywide

Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To the extent possible, your response should not

include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made

available to the public without redaction.

Sincerely,

/RA by Cynthia D. Pederson Acting for/

Mark A. Satorius

Regional Administrator

Docket No. 50-306

License No. DPR-60

Enclosure:

Notice of Violation

cc w/encl: D. Koehl, Chief Nuclear Officer

G. Salamon, Regulatory Affairs Manager

P. Glass, Assistant General Counsel

Nuclear Asset Manager

J. Stine, State Liaison Officer, Minnesota Department of Health

Tribal Council, Prairie Island Indian Community

Administrator, Goodhue County Courthouse

Commissioner, Minnesota Department

of Commerce

Manager, Environmental Protection Division

Office of the Attorney General of Minnesota

Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Dakota

County Law Enforcement Center

M. Schimmel -3-

As a result of our review of Prairie Island Unit 2s performance, including this White finding, we have

assessed you to be in the Regulatory Response column of the NRCs Action Matrix. Therefore, we plan to

conduct a supplemental inspection using Inspection Procedure 95001, Inspection for One or Two White

Inputs in a Strategic Performance Area, when your staff has notified us of your readiness for this

inspection. This inspection procedure is conducted to provide assurance that the root cause and

contributing causes of risk significant performance issues are understood, the extent of condition is

identified, and the corrective actions are sufficient to prevent recurrence.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and

your response, if you choose to provide one, will be made available electronically for public inspection in

the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC=s Agencywide Documents Access and Management

System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To

the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards

information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction.

Sincerely,

/RA by Cynthia D. Pederson Acting for/

Mark A. Satorius

Regional Administrator

Docket No. 50-306

License No. DPR-60

Enclosure:

Notice of Violation

cc w/encl: D. Koehl, Chief Nuclear Officer

G. Salamon, Regulatory Affairs Manager

P. Glass, Assistant General Counsel

Nuclear Asset Manager

J. Stine, State Liaison Officer, Minnesota Department of Health

Tribal Council, Prairie Island Indian Community

Administrator, Goodhue County Courthouse

Commissioner, Minnesota Department

of Commerce

Manager, Environmental Protection Division

Office of the Attorney General of Minnesota

Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Dakota

County Law Enforcement Center

DISTRIBUTION:

See next page

FILE NAME: G:\EICS\ENFORCEMENT\Enforcement Cases 2009\EA-09-167 Prairie Island CCW\EA-09-

167 Prairie Island Draft Final Action.doc

Publicly Available ; Non-Sensitive

OFFICE RIII RIII RIII D:OE RIII RIII

NAME Lougheed Giessner West Bowman for Orth Pederson for

1

Carpenter Satorius

DATE 09/01/09 09/01/09 09/01/09 08/31/09 09/01/09 09/02/09

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

1. OE concurrence received via e-mail from G. Gulla on August 31, 2009.

Letter to Mark A. Schimmel from Mark A. Satorius dated September 3, 2009

SUBJECT: FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION FOR A WHITE FINDING AND

NOTICE OF VIOLATION; NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000306/2009013;

PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, UNIT 2

DISTRIBUTION:

ADAMS (PARS)

RidsSecyMailCenter

OCADistribution

Bill Borchardt

Bruce Mallett

Cynthia Carpenter

Nick Hilton

Marvin Itzkowitz

Catherine Marco

Eric Leeds

Bruce Boger

Mark Satorius

Cynthia Pederson

Steven West

Daniel Holody

Carolyn Evans

William Jones

Steven Orth

Jared Heck

Ross Moore

Mary Ann Ashley

Holly Harrington

Hubert Bell

Guy Caputo

Mona Williams

Allan Barker

James Lynch

Viktoria Mitlyng

Prema Chandrathil

Paul Pelke

Patricia Lougheed

Jeannie Choe

Linda Linn

Monte Phillips

John Giessner

Susan Bagley

RidsNrrPMPrairieIsland

RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource

RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource

ROPreports Resource

OEMAIL Resource

OEWEB Resource

NOTICE OF VIOLATION

Northern States Power Company - Minnesota Docket No. 50-306

Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 2 License No. DPR-60

EA-09-167

During a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted from June 15 to

July 9, 2009, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC

Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below:

Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III, Design

Control, requires, in part, that measures be established to assure that the design basis

for safety-related functions of structures, systems, and components are correctly

translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions. Further,

Criterion III requires that the design control measures provide for verifying or checking

the adequacy of designs.

Contrary to the above, as of July 29, 2008, the licensee failed to implement design

control measures to ensure that the design basis for the component cooling water

system was correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and

instructions. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure that the safety-related function of

the component cooling water system was maintained following a high energy line break,

seismic, or tornado events in the turbine building.

This violation is associated with a White finding.

The NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason for the violation, the corrective

actions taken and planned to be taken to correct the violation and to prevent recurrence, and the

date when full compliance was achieved, is already adequately addressed on the docket in

Inspection Report 05000282/2009010; 05000306/2009010, dated August 5, 2009. However,

you are required to submit a written statement or explanation pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 if the

description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that

case, or if you choose to respond, clearly mark your response as a "Reply to a Notice of

Violation EA-09-167," and send it to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001 with a copy to the Regional

Administrator, Region III, 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210, Lisle IL 60532, and a copy to the

NRC Resident Inspector at the Prairie Island facility, within 30 days of the date of the letter

transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).

If you contest this enforcement action, you should also provide a copy of your response, with the

basis for your denial, to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001.

If you choose to respond, your response will be made available electronically for public

inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs Agencywide Documents

Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at

ENCLOSURE

Notice of Violation -2-

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Therefore, to the extent possible, the response

should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be

made available to the public without redaction.

In accordance with 10 CFR 19.11, you may be required to post this Notice within two working

days.

Dated this 3rd day of September 2009

ENCLOSURE