ML12286A316

Er 05000237-12-301; 05000249-12-301; 08/06/2012 - 08/27/2012; Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Initial License Examination Report

ML12286A316
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	10/12/2012
From:	Hironori Peterson Operations Branch III
To:	Pacilio M Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
References
50-237/12-301, 50-249/12-301
Download: ML12286A316 (11)

See also: IR 05000237/2012301

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210

LISLE, IL 60532-4352

October 12, 2012

Mr. Michael J. Pacilio

Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC

President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear

4300 Winfield Road

Warrenville, IL 60555

SUBJECT: DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3;

NRC INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION REPORT 05000237/2012301;

05000249/2012301

Dear Mr. Pacilio:

On August 27, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed the initial

operator licensing examination process for license applicants employed at your Dresden

Nuclear Power Station. The enclosed report documents the results of those examinations.

Preliminary observations noted during the examination process were discussed on

August 14, 2012, with Mr. D. Czufin and other members of your staff. An exit meeting was

conducted by telephone on September 25, 2012, between Mr. P. DiGiovanna of your staff

and Mr. D. Reeser, Chief Operator Licensing Examiner, to review the proposed final grading

of the written examination for the license applicants. During the telephone conversation,

NRC resolutions of the stations post-examination comments, initially received by the NRC

on August 27, 2012, were discussed.

The NRC examiners administered an initial license examination operating test during the

weeks of August 6 and August 13, 2012. The written examination was administered by

Dresden Nuclear Power Station Training Department personnel on August 17, 2012.

Four Senior Reactor Operator and six Reactor Operator (RO) applicants were administered

license examinations. The results of the examinations were finalized on September 26, 2012.

Two RO applicants failed one or more sections of the administered examination and were

issued proposed license denial letters. Eight applicants passed all sections of their respective

examinations and four were issued senior operator licenses and one was issued an operator

license. The license for one RO applicant is being withheld pending written certification that the

applicant has completed the on-the-job training requirements of the Initial Licensed Operator

Training Program. In accordance with NRC policy, the licenses for two RO applicants are being

withheld pending the outcome of any written examination appeal that may be initiated.

The written examination and other related written examination documentation will be withheld

from public disclosure for 24 months per your request. However, if an applicant received

a proposed license denial letter because of a written examination grade that is less than

80 percent, the applicant will be provided a copy of the written examination. For examination

M. Pacilio -2-

security purposes, your staff should consider that written examination is uncontrolled and

exposed to the public.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.390 of the NRC's

"Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be available electronically for

public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records

System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management

System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/ By Dell R. McNeil Acting For/

Hironori Peterson, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-237, 50-249;72-037

License Nos. DPR-19; DPR-25

Enclosures:

1. Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000237/2012301;

05000249/2012301 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

2. Simulation Facility Report

cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ'

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

Docket Nos: 05000237; 05000249

License Nos: DPR-19; DPR-25

Report No: 05000237/2012301; 05000249/2012301

Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC

Facility: Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3

Location: Morris, IL

Dates: August 6 through 27, 2012

Inspectors: D. Reeser, Chief Examiner

M. Bielby, Examiner

P. Young, Examiner

Approved by: H. Peterson, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

ER 05000237/2012301; 05000249/2012301; 08/06/2012 - 08/27/2012; Exelon Generation

Company, LLC; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Initial License Examination

Report.

The announced initial operator licensing examination was conducted by regional U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission (NRC) examiners in accordance with the guidance of NUREG-1021,

AOperator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@ Revision 9, Supplement 1.

Examination Summary

Eight of ten applicants passed all sections of their respective examinations. Four applicants

were issued senior operator licenses and one applicant was issued an operator license.

Two applicants failed one or more sections of the administered examination and were issued

proposed license denials. The license for one Reactor Operator (RO) applicant is being

withheld pending written certification that the applicant has completed the required on-the-job

training requirements of the Initial Licensed Operator Training Program. The licenses for two

RO applicants are being held and may be issued pending the outcome of any written

examination appeal. (Section 4OA5.1).

1 Enclosure 1

REPORT DETAILS

4OA5 Other Activities

.1 Initial Licensing Examinations

a. Examination Scope

The NRC examiners and members of the facility licensees staff used the guidance

prescribed in NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power

Reactors, Revision 9, Supplement 1, to develop, validate, administer, and grade the

written examination and operating test. Members of the facility licensees staff prepared

the outline and developed the written examination and operating test. The NRC

examiners validated the proposed examination during the week of July 16, 2012, with

the assistance of members of the facility licensees staff. During the on-site validation

week, the examiners audited one license application for accuracy. The NRC examiners,

with the assistance of members of the facility licensees staff, administered the operating

test, consisting of job performance measures and dynamic simulator scenarios, during

the period of August 6 through 14, 2012. The facility licensee administered the written

examination on August 17, 2012.

b. Findings

(1) Written Examination

The NRC examiners determined that the written examination, as proposed by the

licensee, was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.

Less than 20 percent of the proposed examination questions were determined to be

unsatisfactory and required modification or replacement. All changes made to the

proposed written examination were made in accordance with NUREG-1021,

"Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, and documented on

Form ES-401-9, Written Examination Review Worksheet, which will be available in

24 months electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly

Available Records component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and

Management System (ADAMS).

On August 27, 2012, the licensee submitted documentation noting that there were six

post-examination comments for consideration by the NRC examiners when grading the

written examination. The post-examination comments and the NRC resolution for the

post-examination comments, as well as the final as-administered examination and

answer key (ADAMS Accession Number ML12283A450), will be available in 24 months

electronically in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records

component of NRC's ADAMS.

The NRC examiners graded the written examination on September 26, 2012, and

conducted a review of each missed question to determine the accuracy and validity of

the examination questions.

(2) Operating Test

The NRC examiners determined that the operating test, as originally proposed by the

licensee, was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.

2 Enclosure 1

During the validation of the operating test, several Job Performance Measures (JPMs)

were modified. An administrative JPM for Reactor Operator (RO) applicants related to

work hour limitations was revised to increase the level of difficulty so that the applicants

were required to address the requirements needed to work beyond the prescribed work

hour limits, after determining that the limits would be exceeded. The grading standard

for a Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) administrative JPM had to be corrected to remove

an incorrect Technical Specification action requirement. Several control room/in-plant

systems JPMs required changes to the identification of critical steps (changes from non-

critical to critical and vice versa). The cues in several JPMs were revised to require the

applicant to earn the specified information rather than to simply supply the information

at a predefined moment. During validation, one of the dynamic simulator scenarios

was identified as being overly simplistic and was replaced by the more challenging

previously identified spare scenario. Although the number of operating test items

determined to be unsatisfactory did not exceed 20 percent of the total number of

operating test items submitted, and was, therefore, within the range of acceptability,

the number and type of changes made indicate that additional attention in this area was

warranted. Changes made to the operating test are documented in a document titled,

AOperating Test Comments.@ That document as well as the final as-administered

dynamic simulator scenarios and JPMs are available electronically in the NRC Public

Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's ADAMS.

The NRC examiners completed operating test grading on August 14, 2012.

(3) Examination Results

Four applicants at the SRO level and six applicants at the RO level were administered

written examinations and operating tests. Five applicants passed all portions of their

examinations and were issued their respective operating licenses. Two applicants failed

one or more sections of the administered examination and were issued proposed license

denials. One applicant passed all portions of the license examination, but the applicants

license is being withheld pending written certification that the applicant has completed

the on-the-job training requirements of the Initial Licensed Operator Training Program.

Two applicants passed all portions of the license examination, but received a written test

grade less than or equal to 82 percent. In accordance with NRC policy, the applicants=

licenses will be withheld until any written examination appeal possibilities by other

applicants have been resolved. If the applicant=s grade is still equal to or greater than 80

percent after any appeal resolution, the applicant will be issued an operating license. If

the applicant=s grade has declined below 80 percent, the applicant will be issued a

proposed license denial letter and offered the opportunity to appeal any questions the

applicant feels were graded incorrectly.

.2 Examination Security

a. Scope

The NRC examiners reviewed and observed the licensee's implementation of

examination security requirements during the examination validation and administration

to assure compliance with Title10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 55.49,

AIntegrity of Examinations and Tests.@ The examiners used the guidelines provided in

NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,@

to determine acceptability of the licensee=s examination security activities.

3 Enclosure 1

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Management Meetings

.1 Debrief

The Chief Examiner presented the examination team's preliminary observations and

findings on August 14, 2012, to Mr. D. Czufin, Site Vice President and other members of

the Dresden Nuclear Power Station Operations and Training Department staff.

.2 Exit Meeting

The Chief Examiner conducted an exit meeting on September 25, 2012, with

Mr. P. DiGiovanna, Training Director, by telephone. The NRC=s final disposition of

the station=s post-examination comments were disclosed and discussed with

Mr. DiGiovanna during the telephone discussion. The examiners asked the licensee

whether any of the material used to develop or administer the examination should be

considered proprietary. No proprietary or sensitive information was identified during

the examination or debrief/exit meetings.

ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

4 Enclosure 1

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee

D. Czufin, Site Vice President

G. Graff, Nuclear Oversight Manager

H. Dodd, Regulator Assurance Manager

P. DiGiovanna, Training Director

M. Otten, Operations Training Manager

J. Nelson, ILT Examination Coordinator

M. Schimanski, ILT Lead Instructor

G. Morrow, Senior Operations Supervisor

T. Ditchfield, Shift Manager/Facility Representative

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

G. Roach, Senior Resident Inspector

D. Melendez, Resident Inspector

D. Reeser, Chief Examiner

M. Bielby, Examiner

P. Young, Examiner

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

Opened/Closed

None

1 Attachment

LIST OF ACRONYMS USED

ADAMS Agencywide Document Access and Management System

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

DRS Division of Reactor Safety

JPM Job Performance Measure

MMI Minor Maintenance Item (Simulator)

NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

PARS Publicly Available Records System

RO Reactor Operator

SRO Senior Reactor Operator

2 Attachment

SIMULATION FACILITY REPORT

Facility Licensee: Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3

Facility Docket Nos: 05000237; 05000249

Operating Tests Administered: August 6 through 14, 2012

The following documents observations made by the NRC examination team during the initial

operator license examination. These observations do not constitute audit or inspection findings

and are not, without further verification and review, indicative of non-compliance with 10 CFR 55.45(b). These observations do not affect NRC certification or approval of the simulation

facility other than to provide information which may be used in future evaluations. No licensee

action is required in response to these observations.

During the conduct of the simulator portion of the operating tests, the following items were

observed:

ITEM DESCRIPTION

During JPM to Lower Torus Water Level, the Controls for LCV 2-3301,

MMI #8603

NORMAL M-U VLV, Behaved Erratically.

Enclosure 2

M. Pacilio -2-

security purposes, your staff should consider that written examination is uncontrolled and

exposed to the public.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.390 of the NRC's

"Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be available electronically for

public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records

System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management

System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/ By Dell R. McNeil Acting For/

Hironori Peterson, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-237, 50-249;72-037

License Nos. DPR-19; DPR-25

Enclosures:

1. Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000237/2012301;

05000249/2012301 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

2. Simulation Facility Report

cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ'

DISTRIBUTION w/encl:

Cayetano Santos Christine Lipa

RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource Carole Ariano

RidsNrrPMDresden Resource Linda Linn

RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource DRPIII

Chuck Casto DRSIII

Cynthia Pederson Patricia Buckley

Steven Orth Tammy Tomczak

Jared Heck John McHale, NRR

Allan Barker Janet Kweiser, DRS

DOCUMENT NAME: DRE 2012 301.docx

Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with

attach/encl "N" = No copy

OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII

NAME DReeser:cs DMcNeil for

HPeterson

DATE 10/12/12 10/12/12

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY