ML13232A134

PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1, Pilgrim Station Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment C, Page C174 of C413 Through Page C250 of C413

ML13232A134
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	06/17/2013
From:	Maclay L Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
2.13.056 PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev 1
Download: ML13232A134 (77)

Text

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0174 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 049 Equipment ID No. MO1400-24B Equip. Class, Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection Valve Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 R oom, Area NORTH SIDE Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[-I NEi U[iE N/A[D

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE! NE! UEl N/A[

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI NE-I Ur N/A[

anchors?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C175 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NF-Z U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 049 Equipment ID No. M01400-24B Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection Valve

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NE] U-] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[] UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEJ uE1 N/AD-

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE- uEr N/A[-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 64.4 (C942Sh 1, EO) is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEl U[-fl N/AED

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Scaffolding is currently being erected below to the valves to allow access to them. This is a work in progress and is tagged appropriately.

All extra equipment in the areais properly secured and cart wheels are choked.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0176 of C413 AT'rACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UM-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 049 Equipment ID No. M01400-24B Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description Core Spray B Iniection Valve Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NUEI 1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is AWC-019.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay 4oj"Wacha Date: 10-15-12 VI (J

Garv Sweder QA,.A 1,hk , - A 10-15-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C177 of C413 ATTACHMEI T 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ N[- ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 049 Equipment ID No. M01400-24B Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection Valve Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0 178 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[ NE] U-III Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 050 Equipment ID No. MO1400-25B Equip. Classi Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection Valve Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 Rioom, Area NORTH SIDE Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[E] N[-] U-I N/AS

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[E] NEi ULE- NWAS oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI NEI UL-- N/A[

anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C179 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN N-] Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 050 Equipment ID No. M01400-25B Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection Valve

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[-] N[-] UF- N/A[

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y] Nr] UiE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U[E] N/AE]

Noted a hanging light next to the valve is property restrainedagainst lateralmovement, therefore not a seismic hazard.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NE'] u[-] NIAE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 64.4 (C942Sh 1, EO) is safety related, therefore seismically qualified and acceptable.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] uE] NIAE]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y NE-I U-]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Scaffolding is currently being erected below to the valves to allow access to them. This is a work in progress and is taggedappropriately.

All extra equipment in the area is properly secured and cartwheels are choked.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C180 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NF U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 050 Equipment ID No. M01400-25B Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection Valve Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEJ UL-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is AWC-019.

Evaluated by: Gary Sweder TSG" . " "k.ý, Date: 10-15-12 0

I .qur*q Ltqd/qv

%-kW 0,-ý ac -0(11j 10-15-12 IauraMaClav VW ci EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0181 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 050 Equipment ID No. M01400-25B Equip. Class Motor-Operated & Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection Valve Note: Equipment tag 1400-25B Note: Overall view of valve from side EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C182 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NFI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 050 Equipment IDNo. M01400-25B Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description Core Spray B Injection Valve Note: Scaffold erection in progress Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C183 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[ NFl UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 051 Equipment ID No. M01400-3A Equip. Class, Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description Core SprayA Supp Pool Suction Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. -17.5 Room, Area SE QD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline component, no anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE-] N[-] UI-- N/AN

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] U[-] N/AE oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEr NE] U[:] N/A anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0O01, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C 184 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN NEI U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 051 Equipment ID No. M01400-3A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description Core Spray A Supp Pool Suction

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[-I NEi Ur1 N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE] U[]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI uEr N/AE-

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE- N/A[-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead lighting adequately mounted at an angle over the valve, therefore not a seismic hazard.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[I NEI U[-] N/A[--

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C185 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN NEO UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 051 Equipment ID No. M01400-3A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-OperatedValves (08)

Equipment Description Core Sorav A Suaw Pool Suction Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YNNEI UEJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is on AWC-032.

Evaluated by: Gary Sweder J.Q*_. Date: 10-9-12 Laura Maclay LauraMacla qv""-Wac-Qý 10-9-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C 186 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NEI UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 051 Equipment ID No. M01400-3A Equip. Class Motor-Operated& Solenoid-Operated Valves (08)

Equipment Description Core Spray A Supp Pool Suction Photographs Note: Equipment Tag EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OO001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0 187 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NF Ur-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 052 Equipment ID No. VAC-202A Equip. Class' Fans (9), Air Handlers (10), Temp. Sensors (19)

Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm Cooling Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 2.75 Room, Area SW QD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NFI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Reference C359Sh 1, E1 (Detail8)

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI U[I N/AZ-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y; NEI ULI N/AZ" oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NEI UIE- N/AE-anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0188 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE-] uIIL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 052 Equipment ID No. VAC-202A Equip. Class Fans (9), Air Handlers (10). Temp. Sensors (19)

Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm Coolinq

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UD- N/A[-]

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference drawing C359 SHI, detail 8. Anchorage for the steel frame on which VAC-202A is mounted was verified.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ ND"] UD]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[D] UD- N/AD-]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ ND] U[-] N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDl UD-- N/AD-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NF-D Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C0189 of 0413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NO Ur-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 052 Equipment ID No. VAC-202A Equip. Class Fans (9). Air Handlers (10). Temp. Sensors (19)

Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm Cooling Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N[: U-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Mild surface oxidation on the frame due to lack of paint after work was completed (See Picture). Facilities Request 9477 has been made to requestpaintingof frame.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SEWs package for VAC-202A indicatesneoprene vibration isolators need to be addressed to prevent unacceptablehorizontal or vertical displacements during a seismic event. FRN 98-01-33 provides details for the installationof limit stop devices. The walkdown verified the installationof the limit stop devices per the FRN documentation.

Area Walk-By Checklist is A WC-006.

Evaluated by: Gary Sweder )AdAO4 Nk . Date: 10/3/12 I RI~rR MAklv~I I-cu r,, (3 10/3/12 Laura Maclav t/ .

QJ EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C 190 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ Nr ] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 052 Equipment ID No. VAC-202A Equip. Class Fans (9). Air Handlers (10), Temp. Sensors (19)

Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm Cooling Photographs Note: Note: overall view of equipment EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C191 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ Nr-1 U--i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 052 Equipment ID No. VAC-202A Equip. Class Fans (9), Air Handlers (10), Temp. Sensors (19)

Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm Cooling Note: Limit stop device and lack of paint at locations of work area EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-O0001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 0192 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NF UD-'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 053 Equipment ID No. VAC-202B Equip. Classi Fans (9), Air Handlers (10), Temp. Sensors (19)

Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm Coolinq Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 2.75 R oom, Area SWQD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN N[-]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

C91, E2 Detail I used to verify anchorage

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEl U[D] N/AD-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ ND U[-] N/ADl oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y] NDI UED N/AD anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C193 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NEi UrL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 053 Equipment ID No. VAC-202B Equip. Class Fans (9), Air Handlers (10), Temp. Sensors (19)

Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm Cooling

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ ND] UF] N/AD]

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Dimensions were spot checked using C91, E2 and verified to be accurate.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ ND- Ur-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NDI uED N/AD]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NDI uD-] N/AD-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

VAC-202A overhead

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN N[D] UD- N/AD-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDJ UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C194 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ N[- UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 053 Equipment ID No. VAC-202B Equip. Class Fans (9). Air Handlers (10). Temp. Sensors (19)

Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm Cooling Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 N[E] U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SEWs package for VAC-202B indicates neoprene vibration isolators need to be addressed to prevent unacceptablehorizontal or vertical displacements during a seismic event. FRN 98-01-33 provides details for the installationof limit stop devices. The walkdown verified the installationof the limit stop devices per the FRN documentation.

Area Walk-By Checklist is A WC-006.

Evaluated by: Gary Sweder ,dQ, . . o Date: 10-03-12 G

Laura Maclav Laura Maclav Ym=7JAffa?~o aj 10-03-12 (J

I EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C195 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NIF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 053 Equipment ID No. VAC-202B Equip. Class Fans (9), Air Handlers (10), Temp. Sensors (19)

Equipment Description EAC RCIC Rm Cooling Photographs EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C196 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YE NF-] Ur-D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 054 Equipment IDNo. P208C Equip. Class' Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description SSW Pump C Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 25.5 Room, Area C COMP Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE Nil of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UiZ N/AZ--

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[-] Uil N/AZl oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI U N/ARl anchors?

Tight vertical crack (less than 1/8') on northwest comer of pedestal.

Judged to be insignificant;therefore, it presents no seismic hazard. See attachedphoto.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C197 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YM NE] Ur--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 054 Equipment IDNo. P208C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description SSWPump C

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEi UrI N/AE-(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Calculation C15.0.2901, Rev. 1, and Drawing C-45, Rev.

E18.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N-] Ur-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] uiE] N/A[-]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N-] UE] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry block wall 45.2 is seismically qualified. See drawing C-939 SH 1, Rev. EO.

Fluorescentlight fixture above the west side of the P208C cubicle is suspended by an open S-hook. The fixture does not pose a credible threat to P208C; however, it could possibly damage other instruments within the room if it were to swing/fall during a seismic event. See AWC-031 for details.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE] u[-] N/AE]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NE]i UIE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C198 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Yo NE] Ur-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 054 Equipment ID No. P208C Equip. Class Vertical Pumos (06)

Equipment Description SSW Pump C Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

P208Cwas out of service at the time of inspection. The motor was decoupled from the pump and the top cover was removed from the motor. This was not noted as a concern, as the opening had the appropriateFME cover (see attachedphoto).

SWEL 1-054 is on AWC-031.

Evaluated by: David Small dn2-P ii Date: 10/03/2012 Halie Aroz d 1!) 10/03/2012

%</- I EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C199 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NMJ U' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 054 Equipment ID No. P208C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description SSWPump C Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C200 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NI-] UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 054 Equipment ID No. P208C Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description SSWPump C Note: Typical anchorbolts. Note: Tight vertical crack in pedestal.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C201 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YE NFj UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 055 Equipment ID No. P208D Equip. Class, Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description SSWPump D Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 25.5 Room, Area B COMP Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEi of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEi U[-] N/A[-]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEi U[L N/A'-

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NE] Ur- N/A[-]

anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C202 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NIT U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 055 Equipment IDNo. P208D Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description SSWPump D

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[ NF] Ur- N/AR (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Calculation C15.0.1869, Rev. 1, and Drawing C-45, Rev.

E18.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NEI U[

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y] N[D] Ul-- N/AD--

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDJ U-- N/AD-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry walls 45.2 and 45.3 are seismically qualified. See drawing C-939 SH 1, Rev. EO.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO ND:] UDJ N/AD-]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ ND:] ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C203 of C413 Ar"ACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NE] UF]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 055 Equipment ID No. P208D Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description SSWPump D Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D NE] U[-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-055 is on AWC-005.

Evaluated by: David Small 2 9J AA44 Date: 10/03/2012 Halie Aroz 10/03/2012 L.)

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C204 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ No- Ufi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 055 Equipment ID No. P208D Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description SSWPump D Photographs Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C205 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ No UF']

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 055 Equipment ID No. P208D Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description SSWPump D EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. I Attachment C Page C206 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NE] UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 056 Equipment ID No. P208E Equip. Class, Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description SSWPump E Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 25.5 Room, Area B COMP Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ N[-]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE]I U11 N/AL]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE N[] ULI N/A[--

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NF-] U-] N/A[

anchors?

Pedestalis cut on southeast comer to accommodate piping. This looks deliberate and is not close to the bolt, so it is therefore not considered a seismic hazard.

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C207 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 056 Equipment ID No. P208E Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description SSWPump E

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YM NEI UI-- N/A--

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Calculation C15.0.1869, Rev. 1, and Drawing C-45, Rev.

E18.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE- N/A[--

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEi UI- N/AE--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry walls 45.2 and 45.3 are seismically qualified. See drawing C-939 SH 1, Rev. EO.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NR U[-- N/AE1

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UEr of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C208 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ NZ UEZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 056 Equipment IDNo. P208E Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description SSW Pump E Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI uEF adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-056 is on AWC-005.

Evaluated by: David Small D,=JLi? Date: 10/03/2012 HalieAroz 10/03/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C209 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NRI UrL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 056 Equipment ID No. P208E Equip. Class Vertical Pumps (06)

Equipment Description SSWPump E Photographs Note: Note: Typical anchor bolt.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C210 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[ NF Ul-'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 057 Equipment ID No. P202D Equip. Class' HorizontalPumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCWPump D Loop B Location: Bldg. AXBAY Floor El. 3 Room, Area B COMP Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ Nr-1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEIl UEI N/A[-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEil U[] N/Ar-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ N[] UEI N/AD anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C211 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NE] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 057 Equipment ID No. P202D Equip. Class HorizontalPumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCWPump D Loop B

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[E N[-] U[-I N/AD-(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Drawings C-185, Rev. E7 and C-186, Rev. E3.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN ND] U[-D potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NDl UD- N/AD-]

There is some loose foam insulation secured with duct tape on the discharge valve for P202D.As the mass for the insulation is very low, it does not present an adverse seismic interaction. CR-PNP-2012-04405 was written to address this as a generalplant housekeeping concern, and WR 286056 was initiatedfor repair.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UD- N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI UD- N/AD]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM N[-- Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C212 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 057 Equipment IDNo. P202D Equip. Class HorizontalPumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCW PumpD Loop B Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL1-057 is on AWC-003.

Evaluated by: David Small 00,w L4A Date: 10/04/2012 Halie Aroz Ite0 10/04/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C213 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NR Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 057 Equipment ID No. P202D Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCWPump D Loop B Photographs Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C214 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 057 Equipment ID No. P202D Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCWPump D Loop B Note: Typical anchorbolt. Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C215 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y[ NI]I ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 058 Equipment ID No. P202E Equip. Classi Horizontal Pumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCWPump E Loop B Location: Bldg. AXBAY Floor El. 3 Room, Area B COMP Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEIl of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NElI UL N/A[--

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ Nj3 IEu N/AZ]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NEJ Ur] N/AD-]

anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C216 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] UW--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 058 Equipment ID No. P202E - Equip. Class HorizontalPumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCWPump E Loop B

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI Ur-] N/A[--

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Drawings C-185, Rev. E7 and C-186, Rev. E3.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YJZ NW UW-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NW1 UW1 N/AE-]

There is some loose foam insulation secured with duct tape on the discharge valve for P202E. As the mass for the insulation is very low, it does not present an adverse seismic interaction. CR-PNP-2012-04405 was written to address this as a general plant housekeeping concern, and WR 286056 was initiatedfor repair.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NW UW N/A--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NW U-] N/A

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI*N[-]ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C217 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE] Ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 058 Equipment ID No. P202E Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCWPump E Loop B Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI Ur-W adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

One alignment (jacking) bolt on the southeastcornerof P202E was missing from the motor. This screw has no function in the operation of the equipment after installation,so this is not consideredan adverse seismic condition.

Three alignment (jacking)bolts were observed to be in contact with the motor housing which is contraryto standardpractice of backing out the alignment bolts after alignment is achieved and primary mounting hardwareis secured. This condition was previously identified by CR-PNP-2011-3626.Work Order 286700 is scheduled to correct this condition. See attachedphoto.

Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The tag number on P202E was missing. Operationswas notified, and an ESOMS label request was initiated.See CR-PNP-2012-044 11. The equipment was verified for the walkdown using auxiliary equipment tags (see attachedphoto).

SWEL 1-058 is on A WC-003.

Evaluated by: David Small [99JL1 Date: 10/04/2012 Ha Aryi7 10/04/2012 U

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C218 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 058 Equipment ID No. P202E Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCWPump E Loop B Photographs Note: Tag number of auxiliary equipment that Note:

also identifies P202E.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C219 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NI] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 058 Equipment ID No. P202E Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCWPumj E Loo) B Note: Typical anchorbolt. Note: Alignment bolt in contact with motor housing.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C220 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YM NF] UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 059 Equipment ID No. P202F Equip. Class' HorizontalPumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCWPump F Loop B Location: Bldg. AXBAY Floor El. 3 Room, Area B COMP Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NE]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N[] U-I N/AI3

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE N] U[-I] N/A-]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ N[] U-] N/A[-]

anchors?

There is a small chip out of the east end of the pedestal that is judged to be insignificant.

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C221 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NR UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 059 Equipment ID No. P202F Equip. Class HorizontalPumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCWPump F Loop B

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ N[l UiD N/A[-]

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Drawings C-185, Rev. E7 and C-186, Rev. E3.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NDI UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NDI UD] N/AD-There is some partially detached foam insulation on the dischargevalve for P202F.As the mass for the insulation is very low, it does not present an adverse seismic interaction.CR-PNP-2012-04405 was written to address this as a generalplant housekeeping concern, and WR 286056 was initiatedfor repair.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDl UD-- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NDI UD1 N/AD-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDl UDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C222 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y0I NEI Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 059 Equipment IDNo. P202F Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCWPump F Loop B Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NE] U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL1-059 is on AWC-003.

Evaluated by: David Small . A /, e /d Date: 10/04/2012 Halie Aroz jI 10/04/2012 C)

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C223 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NF Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 059 Equipment ID No. P202F Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCWPump F Loop B Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C224 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ N[-I U[III Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 059 Equipment ID No. P202F Equip. Class Horizontal Pumps (05)

Equipment Description RBCCWPump F Loop B Note: Typical anchor bolt. Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C225 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 6 Status: Y[ NE] U-D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 060 Equipment ID No. E209B Equip. Class, Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)

Equipment Description RBCCW Loop B Heat Exchanger Location: Bldg. AXBAY Floor El. 3 Room, Area B COMP Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NOI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ N[-] Ur-] N/Ar-Both anchors in the south pedestal and the east anchorin the north pedestal are slightly skewed, and the west anchor in the north pedestal is not engaged by a small amount (approx. Y2 thread). These conditions are judged to be acceptable, and are not considered a seismic hazard.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE ND] ul- N/AD-'

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN NDI uF- N/ADI anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C226 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 060 Equipment ID No. E209B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)

Equipment Description RBCCW Loop B Heat Exchanger

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEi Ur- N/AF-]

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Drawing C-185, Rev. E7, FRN 98-01-78, and FRN 95-01-60.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] UI-'

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] UE-- N/AE-There is scaffolding very close to E209B that has a seismic evaluation tag, so it is acceptable for interaction effects.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] UEr] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The Marinite boardseparatingcable trays in the southwest corner of the room has some pieces missing. There are currently no pieces that are hanging off or look ready to fall, so it does not present a seismic interactionhazard.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NE[] U[] N/AE1

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C227 of C413 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ NO UMI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 060 Equipment ID No. E209B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)

Equipment Description RBCCW Loop B Heat Exchanger Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 Nr-I UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A loose label for equipment # 29-HO-3840 was found on the west side of E209B on the north pedestal. This was reportedto Operationsand an ESOMS request has been initiated. See CR-PNP-2012-04411.

SWEL 1-060 is on AWC-003.

Evaluated by: David Small 2 2 Date: 10/04/2012 Halie Aroz a 10/04/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C228 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YZ NF UF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 060 Equipment ID No. E209B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)

Equipment Description RBCCWLooo B Heat Exchanger Photographs Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C229 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: YE NE] UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 060 Equipment ID No. E209B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)

Equipment Description RBCCWLooo B Heat Exchanqer Note: Typical south pedestal anchorbolt. Note: Typical north pedestal anchorbolt.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C230 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: Y[ NEI UIr Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 060 Equipment IDNo. E209B Equip. Class Tanks and Heat Exchangers (21)

Equipment Description RBCCW Loop B Heat Exchanger Note: North pedestal modification. Note: North pedestal modification.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C231 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NIF UI-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 061 Equipment ID No. C2205A Equip. Class, Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description ReactorProt &NSS Instr Rack Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 Room, Area East Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NO*

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The SEWs package for this component conservatively evaluates one of four various instrumentrack anchorages. This rack was not evaluated, and therefore configurationcan not be verified by the package. All bolts are visible, so the remainder of this section is applicable.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NDJ UEI N/AL:]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NDJ U-- N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN NDI U-- N/AD1 anchors?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C232 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NEI UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 061 Equipment ID No. C2205A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Reactor Prot &NSS Instr Rack

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[-- NO UI- N/AE (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question #1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ ND UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NW UW N/A[D]

C2205A is bolted to C2205B, so this is not a seismic interaction concern. C2205A is also adjacent to but not bolted to A TWS rack 2275; however, there is sufficient clearance( > 2") between the racks.

Therefore, this is not considered a potentiallyadverse seismic interaction.

One set screw is missing on the fence enclosing the racks. This is not a seismic hazard since the fence is judged to still be securely mounted to the floor, but CR-PNP-2012-04659was written and WR 287549 initiated to address the concern. See attachedphoto.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN ND u[:] N/AD-I and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS NW UD:] N/AD-I

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C233 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YoI NEI ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 061 Equipment ID No. C2205A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Reactor Prot &NSS Instr Rack Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-061 is on AWC-021.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay & AQL-2& " Date: 10/17/2012 Halie Aroz 11 K 10/17/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C234 of C413 ATnACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y] NF- UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 061 Equipment ID No. C2205A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description ReactorProt &NSS Instr Rack Photographs Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C235 of C413 AT-IACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 061 Equipment ID No. C2205A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Reactor Prot &NSS Instr Rack Note: Missing set screw on fence. Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C236 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ NR- U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 062 Equipment ID No. C2205B Equip. Class, Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description ReactorProt &NSS Instr Rack Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 Room, Area East Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[--] NO:

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The SEWs package for this component conservatively evaluates one of four various instrument rack anchorages. This rack was not evaluated, and therefore configuration can not be verified by the package. All bolts are visible, so the remainderof this section is applicable.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEE NEJ URL N/AD--

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NE] U[] N/AL]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN N[] U-- N/Ar-anchors?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C237 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NIEj U[-']

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 062 Equipment IDNo. C2205B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description ReactorProt & NSS Instr Rack

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YrI NR] U[I N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question #1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UrI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NI] u[-] N/A[-]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE] U-I] N/A--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI UL-] N/Ar]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NE] U[-

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C238 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YO] NnZur U]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 062 Equipment ID No. C2205B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Reactor Prot & NSS Instr Rack Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI U[:]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL1-062 is on AWC-021.

Evaluated Date: 10/17/2012 10/17/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C239 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NF- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 062 Equipment ID No. C2205B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Reactor Prot &NSS Instr Rack Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Overall view of instrumentrack from outside of fencing.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C240 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 6 Status: YE NDI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 063 Equipment ID No. C2206A Equip. Class, Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description ReactorProt & NSS Instr Rack Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 Room, Area West Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The SEWs package conservatively evaluates similar rack C2206B, which has only six anchors, and comparatively accepts the eight anchorageconfigurationfor rack C2206A. Therefore, since a drawing does not specify the eight bolt configuration, this component was not chosen for the 50% verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NI UE-I N/A[--

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE ND UD N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NDI U' N/AD anchors?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C241 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NIF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 063 Equipment ID No. C2206A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Reactor Prot &NSS Instr Rack

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YrI NR UI- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question #1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEi UIZ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NDI UD- N/AD-]

Racks C2206A and C2206B are bolted together and therefore do not pose a seismic risk to each other.

The robust barrierfence aroundRacks C2206A & C2206B has set screws missing from the base brackets of three of the verticalposts.

The fence consists of an interconnectedframework of light support members and wire mesh. The weight and mass of the assembly is relatively low. The remainingposts (approx 5) have the set screws installed. The base brackets with the missing set screws still function to resist lateralloads. Since vertical seismic accelerationsare less than Ig (Ref Spec C114ERQ), there is no expected uplift at the post locations.

Based on these considerations,the identified condition does not representa potential adverse seismic interaction. CR-PNP-2012-04627 was written to replace missing screws.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDl UD- N/AD-'

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The west masonry block walls next to the rack, 65.9 and 65.10 are safety related.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI Ur- N/AD-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NDl UD1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C242 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 063 Equipment ID No. C2206A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Reactor Prot &NSS Instr Rack Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[-] Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cover for pressure transmitter36-PT-654 is missing one of four bolts which keep the cover secured to the equipment. This is not a seismic concern due the redundancy of the other three bolts. CR-PNP-2012-04629 was written to address this item and calls for replacement of the missing fastener.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is A WC-020.

Evaluated by. Laura Ma . ~&]flAcA~~?fYJ~ic ~ Oam Date: 10-16-12

,ý"ma-Wac IJUI V !dUSwg'Jg Aq

'.1A.4 I  %-1LJ Aj A. - 10-16-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C243 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YZ NR UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 063 Equipment IDNo. C2206A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description Reactor Prot &NSS Instr Rack Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Overall view of rack outside of fencing EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-OOOO1, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C244 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 Status: Y[ NI I U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 063 Equipment ID No. C2206A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description ReactorProt & NSS Instr Rack Note: Typical anchors Note: Back of cover for pressure transmitteris missing a bolt (CR-PNP-2012-04629).

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C245 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 Status: Y[ NI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 063 Equipment ID No. C2206A Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description ReactorProt &NSS Instr Rack Note: Missing screw in fence base bracket Note:

(CR-PNP-2012-04627).

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C246 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 064 Equipment IDNo. C2206B Equip. Class, Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description ReactorProt & NSS Instr Rack Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 51 Room, Area West Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NE]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NE] ULI N/AEl

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE] UE] N/AE]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NE] UE] N/Ar-anchors?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C247 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NE] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 064 Equipment ID No. C2206B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description ReactorProt & NSS Instr Rack

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI U[r] N/A[-

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to SEWs package dated 6/19/95 for anchorageconfiguration.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UE- N/A[-]

Racks C2206A and C2206B are bolted together and therefore do not pose a seismic risk to each other.

There is a 3" gap between C2276 and C2206B. However, both racks are well anchored.

The robust barrierfence aroundRacks C2206A & C2206B has set screws missing from the base brackets of three of the verticalposts.

The fence consists of an interconnectedframework of light support members and wire mesh. The weight and mass of the assembly is relatively low. The remainingposts (approx 5) have the set screws installed. The base brackets with the missing set screws still function to resist lateralloads. Since vertical seismic accelerationsare less than Ig (Ref Spec C1 14ERQ), there is no expected uplift at the post locations.

Based on these considerations,the identified condition does not representa potentialadverse seismic interaction. CR-PNP-2012-04627 was written to replace missing screws.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[-] N/A[-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The west masonry block walls next to the rack, 65.9 and 65.10 are safety related.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UE] N/AE-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NE ]UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C248 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UDý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 064 Equipment ID No. C2206B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description ReactorProt & NSS Instr Rack Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE]i Ur]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is A WC-020.

Evaluated by: Laura Maly '~aA A kCkQVL Date: 10-16-12 Gary Sweder Aal~ \~.tL.o_ 10-16-12 (3 -

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C249 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN Nn--I UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 064 Equipment ID No. C2206B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description ReactorProt & NSS Instr Rack Photographs Note: Equipment tag Note: Overall view of both racks C2206A and C2206B.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1 Attachment C Page C250 of C413 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NR Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 064 Equipment ID No. C2206B Equip. Class Instrument Racks (18)

Equipment Description ReactorProt &NSS Instr Rack Note: Missing set screw in surrounding Note:

fencing (CR-PNP-2012-04627)

EN-DC-168 REV 0