ML15020A346: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 02/11/2015
| issue date = 02/11/2015
| title = Summary of December 18, 2014, Meeting with Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Operating License Application (Licensing Milestones)
| title = Summary of December 18, 2014, Meeting with Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Operating License Application (Licensing Milestones)
| author name = Poole J C
| author name = Poole J
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000391
| docket = 05000391
| license number = NPF-090
| license number = NPF-090
| contact person = Minarik A J
| contact person = Minarik A
| package number = ML15043A310
| package number = ML15043A310
| document type = Meeting Summary
| document type = Meeting Summary
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 February 11, 2015 APPLICANT: Tennessee Valley Authority FACILITY: Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2  
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 February 11, 2015 APPLICANT: Tennessee Valley Authority FACILITY:       Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
SUMMARY OF DECEMBER 18, 2014, MEETING WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY REGARDING THE WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION (LICENSING MILESTONES) On December 18, 2014, a Category 1 public teleconference was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) staff and representatives of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The purpose of this meeting was for TVA and the NRC staff to discuss process-related milestones for both TVA and the NRC for the final stages of the operating license application review and decision on Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN), Unit 2. The discussion focused on the relationship between process-related NRC milestones and construction completion milestones for TVA. The meeting notice and agenda, dated November 14, 2014, is available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at Accession No. ML 14349A006. A list of attendees is provided as Enclosure 1. TVA presented meeting slides provided as Enclosure 2. The NRC staff had no formal presentation material at this meeting. The second portion of this meeting was closed to the public in order to discuss security-related information on the topic of cyber security. TVA explained its plans for submitting what will be referred to as the "Substantially Complete Letter." This letter is used to communicate to the NRC that construction activities at the site are complete and the plant is nearly ready to receive fuel on-site. The NRC uses this declaration to satisfy one of the criteria stated in Title 1 O of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 50.57, "Issuance of an Operating License." TVA explained that it planned to submit this letter 90 days prior to loading fuel and 60 days prior to the Commission's decision on whether to grant them an operating license. This letter would also identify TVA activities that would need to be completed prior to receipt of fuel on site in various attachments. In addition to this letter, TVA plans to submit a "Ready for Fuel Load" letter, which will close any open items necessary for fuel load that were identified in the Substantially Complete Letter, and that the plant is ready to load fuel. TVA recognizes that some inspections related to NRC Inspection Procedure 94300 will be taking place in parallel to these efforts. TVA also disclosed that its current schedule for fuel load is the end of May 2015, and described that they plan to submit the Substantially Complete Letter by the end of February 2015. Most of this discussion followed the talking points on the handouts. The NRC staff asked TVA to clarify what was meant by "construction completion" (which triggers the Substantially Complete Letter) and TVA stated that it identifies construction as complete when all of the systems have been turned over to startup and operations. In addition, the NRC staff stated that it did not feel that the Substantially Complete Letter was needed before the NRC staff's vote paper to the Commission. The NRC staff reminded TVA that during the October 30, 2014, Commission Meeting, members of the Commission indicated to the NRC staff that they would appreciate more time than the currently scheduled 60 days to review the information related to WBN Unit 2. The NRC staff clarified TVA's understanding that a Federal Register notice had to be issued by the staff prior to licensing was not accurate. The NRC staff stated that the requirements of 10 CFR 50.58(b)(2) were met by the notices for an opportunity for hearing published in 2009. Some members of the public had comments and questions for the NRC. Mr. Marvin Lewis, a concerned member of the public, commented that it sounded as though the NRC and TVA were rushing through this process in an effort to get everything done. The NRC assured Mr. Lewis that the discussions of schedules and timelines are of minor importance to the NRC. The NRC's primary focus is the safety of the plant. The NRC will take as much time as needed to make a finding of reasonable assurance on the safety of the plant. Whether or not the NRC can complete its review along the same timeline as TVA is immaterial, though the NRC appreciates the information for its own awareness. Mr. Brian Paddock of the Tennessee Sierra Club asked the NRC to clarify whether the hearing opportunities have been exhausted for the WBN Unit 2 operating license application. NRC staff explained that a notice for an opportunity for hearing was published in 2009, and the deadlines for that has expired. In accordance with 10 CFR Part 2, on a case-by-case basis, the NRC will consider additional contentions, but they must be based on new and significant information. No feedback forms were submitted at this meeting and no regulatory decisions were made at this meeting. Please direct any inquiries to Justin Poole at 301-415-2048, or to justin.poole@nrc.gov. Docket No. 50-391  
 
==SUMMARY==
OF DECEMBER 18, 2014, MEETING WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY REGARDING THE WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION (LICENSING MILESTONES)
On December 18, 2014, a Category 1 public teleconference was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) staff and representatives of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The purpose of this meeting was for TVA and the NRC staff to discuss process-related milestones for both TVA and the NRC for the final stages of the operating license application review and decision on Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN), Unit 2. The discussion focused on the relationship between process-related NRC milestones and construction completion milestones for TVA. The meeting notice and agenda, dated November 14, 2014, is available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at Accession No. ML14349A006. A list of attendees is provided as Enclosure 1.
TVA presented meeting slides provided as Enclosure 2. The NRC staff had no formal presentation material at this meeting. The second portion of this meeting was closed to the public in order to discuss security-related information on the topic of cyber security.
TVA explained its plans for submitting what will be referred to as the "Substantially Complete Letter." This letter is used to communicate to the NRC that construction activities at the site are complete and the plant is nearly ready to receive fuel on-site. The NRC uses this declaration to satisfy one of the criteria stated in Title 1O of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
Section 50.57, "Issuance of an Operating License." TVA explained that it planned to submit this letter 90 days prior to loading fuel and 60 days prior to the Commission's decision on whether to grant them an operating license. This letter would also identify TVA activities that would need to be completed prior to receipt of fuel on site in various attachments. In addition to this letter, TVA plans to submit a "Ready for Fuel Load" letter, which will close any open items necessary for fuel load that were identified in the Substantially Complete Letter, and that the plant is ready to load fuel. TVA recognizes that some inspections related to NRC Inspection Procedure 94300 will be taking place in parallel to these efforts. TVA also disclosed that its current schedule for fuel load is the end of May 2015, and described that they plan to submit the Substantially Complete Letter by the end of February 2015. Most of this discussion followed the talking points on the handouts.
 
The NRC staff asked TVA to clarify what was meant by "construction completion" (which triggers the Substantially Complete Letter) and TVA stated that it identifies construction as complete when all of the systems have been turned over to startup and operations. In addition, the NRC staff stated that it did not feel that the Substantially Complete Letter was needed before the NRC staff's vote paper to the Commission. The NRC staff reminded TVA that during the October 30, 2014, Commission Meeting, members of the Commission indicated to the NRC staff that they would appreciate more time than the currently scheduled 60 days to review the information related to WBN Unit 2.
The NRC staff clarified TVA's understanding that a Federal Register notice had to be issued by the staff prior to licensing was not accurate. The NRC staff stated that the requirements of 10 CFR 50.58(b)(2) were met by the notices for an opportunity for hearing published in 2009.
Some members of the public had comments and questions for the NRC. Mr. Marvin Lewis, a concerned member of the public, commented that it sounded as though the NRC and TVA were rushing through this process in an effort to get everything done. The NRC assured Mr. Lewis that the discussions of schedules and timelines are of minor importance to the NRC. The NRC's primary focus is the safety of the plant. The NRC will take as much time as needed to make a finding of reasonable assurance on the safety of the plant. Whether or not the NRC can complete its review along the same timeline as TVA is immaterial, though the NRC appreciates the information for its own awareness. Mr. Brian Paddock of the Tennessee Sierra Club asked the NRC to clarify whether the hearing opportunities have been exhausted for the WBN Unit 2 operating license application. NRC staff explained that a notice for an opportunity for hearing was published in 2009, and the deadlines for that has expired. In accordance with 10 CFR Part 2, on a case-by-case basis, the NRC will consider additional contentions, but they must be based on new and significant information.
No feedback forms were submitted at this meeting and no regulatory decisions were made at this meeting.
 
Please direct any inquiries to Justin Poole at 301-415-2048, or to justin.poole@nrc.gov.
Justin C. Poole, Senior Project Manager Watts Bar Special Projects Branch Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-391


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. List of Attendees 2. Meeting Slides cc w/enclosures: Distribution via Listserv Justin C. Poole, Senior Project Manager Watts Bar Special Projects Branch Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation LIST OF ATTENDEES Applicant: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Plant: Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN). Unit 2  
: 1. List of Attendees
: 2. Meeting Slides cc w/enclosures: Distribution via Listserv
 
LIST OF ATTENDEES Applicant: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Plant: Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN). Unit 2


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Licensing Milestones Date: December 18. 2014 Location: Teleconference Time: 8:30 a.m. -10:00 a.m. NAME TITLE ORGANIZATION U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Michele Evans Division Director (NRC)/Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)/Division of Operating Reactor Licensing (DORL) Louise Lund Deputy Division Director NRC/NRR/DORL Justin Poole Sr. Project Manager, Watts Bar, NRC/NRR/DORL/Watts Bar Special Unit 2 Projects Branch (LPWB) Anthony Minarik Project Manager NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB Mike Miernicki Project Manager NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB Jeanne Dion Project Manager, Watts Bar, NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB Unit 1 Robert Haag* Branch Chief Region II/Division of Construction Projects/Branch 3 Gene Cobey Licensing and Engineering TVA Management Gordon Arent Director of Licensing, TVA Watts Bar Steve Hilmes Engineering Management TVA Laura Snyder Licensing and Engineering TVA Manager Enclosure 1   NAME TITLE ORGANIZATION Joe Calle Licensing and Engineering TVA Manager Bob Bryan* Licensing TVA Marvin Lewis* Public Brian Paddock* Tennessee Sierra Club Ruth Thomas* Public *participated via teleconference   Meeting Slides   
Licensing Milestones             Date: December 18. 2014 Location:   Teleconference                   Time: 8:30 a.m. - 10:00 a.m.
...... c c: 0 ca *-ti> -ti) a.. ::l .... 0 ca ti) *-v Cl) cc; -N__ (J C)CO :l Cl) :: z ... Q) ca .o .... s.. E ... Q) ca en u Q) m C)O c tn *-ti> ...... c ...... ca Cl) (.) *-_J Ui1 Agenda
NAME                         TITLE                       ORGANIZATION U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)/Office of Nuclear Reactor Michele Evans        Division Director Regulation (NRR)/Division of Operating Reactor Licensing (DORL)
Louise Lund         Deputy Division Director         NRC/NRR/DORL Sr. Project Manager, Watts Bar, NRC/NRR/DORL/Watts Bar Special Justin Poole Unit 2                           Projects Branch (LPWB)
Anthony Minarik     Project Manager                 NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB Mike Miernicki       Project Manager                 NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB Project Manager, Watts Bar, Jeanne Dion                                          NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB Unit 1 Region II/Division of Construction Robert Haag*        Branch Chief Projects/Branch 3 Licensing and Engineering Gene Cobey                                            TVA Management Director of Licensing, Gordon Arent                                          TVA Watts Bar Steve Hilmes         Engineering Management           TVA Licensing and Engineering Laura Snyder                                          TVA Manager Enclosure 1
 
NAME                         TITLE                 ORGANIZATION Licensing and Engineering Joe Calle Manager TVA Bob Bryan*             Licensing                 TVA Marvin Lewis*                                     Public Brian Paddock*                                   Tennessee Sierra Club Ruth Thomas*                                     Public
*participated via teleconference
 
Enclosure 2 Meeting Slides
 
  ...... c c:     0
-a..ca *-ti>
ti)
::l
  .... 0 ca     ti)
        *- v
- Cl)
(J
:l cc;
        ~ N__
C)CO Cl) ::
z     ...
ca .oQ)
  .... s.. E ca en
        ... Q) u mc      C)O Q) tn *-
...... ti>
...... c ca Cl) (.)
~      *-
_J
 
Ui1 Agenda
* Licensing Communications
* Licensing Communications
* Substantially Complete Letter
* Substantially Complete Letter
* Ready For Fuel Load Letter
* Ready For Fuel Load Letter
* Unit 2 Completion
* Unit 2 Completion
* Unit 2 -Key Milestone Linkages
* Unit 2 - Key Milestone Linkages
* Other Items of Interest Calle 2 ll!lil Substantially Complete Letter Calle
* Other Items of Interest Calle                                 2
* Definition of Substantially Complete -When the Owner takes responsibility -T 0 -based on plant completion, not time to startup
 
* Substantially Complete Letter timed to support notation paper -allows Commission 60 days for review of notation paper -approximately 90 days prior to fuel load -Does this sequence work?
ll!lil Substantially Complete Letter
* Letter will include a Readiness Assessment Report -Readiness Assessment Report will provide inventory of TVA Quality Activities to construct, test, transition to dual unit operations -Readiness Assessment Report will include high level list of remaining construction and testing activities to complete before fuel load 3 ll!/il Substantially Complete Letter Calle
* Definition of Substantially Complete
* Substantially Complete letter aligned to 10 CFR 50.57 -(1) Construction of the facility has been substantially completed, in conformity with the construction permit and the application as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; and -(2) The facility will operate in conformity with the application as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; and -(3) There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by the operating license can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the regulations in this chapter 4
          - When the Owner takes responsibility
[i!] Substantially Complete Letter Substantially complete letter alignment to the sub-parts of 10 CFR 50.57 10CFR 50.57 Sub-part ( 1 ) Construction of the facility has been substantially completed, in conformity with the construction permit and the application as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; and (2) The facility will operate in conformity with the application as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; and (3) There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by the operating license can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the regulations in this chapter Substantially Complete Letter Section Attachment A 1-Current Schedule for Completion of Remaining Work Attachment A2 -Design Basis Verification Attachment A3 -Refurbishment Program Description Attachment A4 -CAPs and SPs Attachment A5 -Status of New Generic Communications Attachment A6 -Status of Generic Communications Attachment A 7 -Quality Assurance Activities Attachment 81 -Current Schedule for Completion of the Test Program Attachment C 1 -Department Transition and Change Management Plans Attachment C2 -Unit Differences -Design Attachment C3 -Unit Differences -Training Attachment C4 -Safety Culture 5
          - T 0 - based on plant completion, not time to startup
[i!/il Ready For Fuel Load Letter Calle
* Substantially Complete Letter timed to support notation paper
* Letter to be submitted just prior to fuel load -Will include: Schedule for testing -Startup and Power ascension List of activities that need completion prior to fuel load Exemptions and anticipated conditions of the license -Will request quick turnaround -Will request full power license -Is there an implied linkage with the 94300 or other inspection process 6
          - allows Commission 60 days for review of notation paper
          - approximately 90 days prior to fuel load
          - Does this sequence work?
* Letter will include a Readiness Assessment Report
          - Readiness Assessment Report will provide inventory of TVA Quality Activities to construct, test, transition to dual unit operations
          - Readiness Assessment Report will include high level list of remaining construction and testing activities to complete before fuel load Calle                                                                              3
 
ll!/il Substantially Complete Letter
* Substantially Complete letter aligned to 10 CFR 50.57
          - (1) Construction of the facility has been substantially completed, in conformity with the construction permit and the application as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; and
          - (2) The facility will operate in conformity with the application as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; and
          - (3) There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by the operating license can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the regulations in this chapter Calle                                                                              4
 
[i!] Substantially Complete Letter Substantially complete letter alignment to the sub-parts of 10 CFR 50.57 10CFR 50.57 Sub-part                         Substantially Complete Letter Section
( 1) Construction of the facility has been           Attachment A 1- Current Schedule for Completion of substantially completed, in conformity with the                     Remaining Work construction permit and the application as           Attachment A2 - Design Basis Verification amended, the provisions of the Act, and the         Attachment A3 - Refurbishment Program Description rules and regulations of the Commission; and         Attachment A4 - CAPs and SPs Attachment A5 - Status of New Generic Communications Attachment A6 - Status of Generic Communications Attachment A 7 - Quality Assurance Activities (2) The facility will operate in conformity with the Attachment 81 - Current Schedule for Completion of application as amended, the provisions of the                         the Test Program Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; and (3) There is reasonable assurance (i) that the       Attachment C 1 - Department Transition and Change activities authorized by the operating license                       Management Plans can be conducted without endangering the             Attachment C2 - Unit Differences - Design health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such Attachment C3 - Unit Differences - Training activities will be conducted in compliance with     Attachment C4 - Safety Culture the regulations in this chapter 5
 
[i!/il Ready For Fuel Load Letter
* Letter to be submitted just prior to fuel load
          - Will include:
                  ~  Schedule for testing - Startup and Power ascension
                  ~  List of activities that need completion prior to fuel load
                  ~  Exemptions and anticipated conditions of the license
          - Will request quick turnaround
          - Will request full power license
          - Is there an implied linkage with the 94300 or other inspection process Calle                                                                          6
 
[i!/il Unit 2
[i!/il Unit 2
* Key Milestone Linkages Construction is Substantially Complete All Systems and Areas turned over from Bechtel to TVA TVA NRC Calle Fukushima Orders Closed ACRS Final Letter TVA Construction is Substantially Complete NRR submits Notation Vote Paper Commission Decision to Issue License Integrated Safeguards Testing Complete (final Mandatory MC 2513 inspection) Federal Register Region 2 finding-Notice of Intent (94300) Inspection to Issue license Program Complete TVA Letter Ready for Fuel Load WRAG confirms all licensing issues are resolved 30 Day Mandatory FRN 7
* Key Milestone Linkages Construction is Substantially Complete TVA Letter-All Systems and       Construction is                      Integrated Safeguards Testing Areas turned over from Substantially                        Complete (final Mandatory MC        TVA Letter Bechtel to TVA         Complete                            2513 inspection)                    Ready for Fuel Load TVA NRC                                                                                                                             30 Day Mandatory FRN Fukushima     ACRS Final         NRR submits   Commission   Federal Register   Region 2 finding-   WRAG confirms all Orders        Letter            Notation Vote Decision to  Notice of Intent   (94300) Inspection licensing issues are Closed                          Paper        Issue License to Issue license   Program Complete   resolved Calle                                                                                                                                          7
[i!/il Other Items of Interest Calle
 
[i!/il Other Items of Interest
* Connections between ORAT and Hot Functional Testing.
* Connections between ORAT and Hot Functional Testing.
* Federal Register Notice 30-day notice per 50.58(b)(2). [LIC-110, Sect 6.17]
* Federal Register Notice 30-day notice per 50.58(b)(2). [LIC-110, Sect 6.17]
* Are there any other potential administrative process or procedural issues that should be addressed and included in the schedule? 8 en c 0 *-.... en Cl) :l a
* Are there any other potential administrative process or procedural issues that should be addressed and included in the schedule?
Calle                                                                        8
 
en c
*-....0 en Cl)
:l a


PKG ML 15043A310 Meetm;J N ML 9AO 6 M otice: 1434 0 eetmg s ummary: RidsNrrDorl Resource MWaters, OEDO TWertz, NRR LRonewicz, NRR CMoulton, NRR MMiernicki, NRR ML 15020A 346 OFFICE OORL/LWBSP/PMiT DORL/LWBSP/PM DORL/LPL2-2/LAiT DORL/LWBSP/LA DORL/LWBSP/BC NAME AMinarik JPoole LRonewicz BClayton JQuichocho DATE 11/12/14 2/11/15 1/21/15 2/3/15 2/11/15}}
PKG ML15043A310 Meetm;J Notice: ML 14349AO 0 6                   Meetmg    s ummary:   ML15020A346 OFFICE OORL/LWBSP/PMiT DORL/LWBSP/PM         DORL/LPL2-2/LAiT   DORL/LWBSP/LA   DORL/LWBSP/BC DORL/LWBSP/PM NAME     AMinarik         JPoole             LRonewicz         BClayton       JQuichocho   JPoole DATE     11/12/14         2/11/15           1/21/15           2/3/15           2/11/15      2/11/15}}

Latest revision as of 16:53, 31 October 2019

Summary of December 18, 2014, Meeting with Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Operating License Application (Licensing Milestones)
ML15020A346
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 02/11/2015
From: Justin Poole
Watts Bar Special Projects Branch
To:
Tennessee Valley Authority
Minarik A
Shared Package
ML15043A310 List:
References
Download: ML15020A346 (16)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 February 11, 2015 APPLICANT: Tennessee Valley Authority FACILITY: Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF DECEMBER 18, 2014, MEETING WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY REGARDING THE WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION (LICENSING MILESTONES)

On December 18, 2014, a Category 1 public teleconference was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) staff and representatives of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The purpose of this meeting was for TVA and the NRC staff to discuss process-related milestones for both TVA and the NRC for the final stages of the operating license application review and decision on Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN), Unit 2. The discussion focused on the relationship between process-related NRC milestones and construction completion milestones for TVA. The meeting notice and agenda, dated November 14, 2014, is available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at Accession No. ML14349A006. A list of attendees is provided as Enclosure 1.

TVA presented meeting slides provided as Enclosure 2. The NRC staff had no formal presentation material at this meeting. The second portion of this meeting was closed to the public in order to discuss security-related information on the topic of cyber security.

TVA explained its plans for submitting what will be referred to as the "Substantially Complete Letter." This letter is used to communicate to the NRC that construction activities at the site are complete and the plant is nearly ready to receive fuel on-site. The NRC uses this declaration to satisfy one of the criteria stated in Title 1O of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)

Section 50.57, "Issuance of an Operating License." TVA explained that it planned to submit this letter 90 days prior to loading fuel and 60 days prior to the Commission's decision on whether to grant them an operating license. This letter would also identify TVA activities that would need to be completed prior to receipt of fuel on site in various attachments. In addition to this letter, TVA plans to submit a "Ready for Fuel Load" letter, which will close any open items necessary for fuel load that were identified in the Substantially Complete Letter, and that the plant is ready to load fuel. TVA recognizes that some inspections related to NRC Inspection Procedure 94300 will be taking place in parallel to these efforts. TVA also disclosed that its current schedule for fuel load is the end of May 2015, and described that they plan to submit the Substantially Complete Letter by the end of February 2015. Most of this discussion followed the talking points on the handouts.

The NRC staff asked TVA to clarify what was meant by "construction completion" (which triggers the Substantially Complete Letter) and TVA stated that it identifies construction as complete when all of the systems have been turned over to startup and operations. In addition, the NRC staff stated that it did not feel that the Substantially Complete Letter was needed before the NRC staff's vote paper to the Commission. The NRC staff reminded TVA that during the October 30, 2014, Commission Meeting, members of the Commission indicated to the NRC staff that they would appreciate more time than the currently scheduled 60 days to review the information related to WBN Unit 2.

The NRC staff clarified TVA's understanding that a Federal Register notice had to be issued by the staff prior to licensing was not accurate. The NRC staff stated that the requirements of 10 CFR 50.58(b)(2) were met by the notices for an opportunity for hearing published in 2009.

Some members of the public had comments and questions for the NRC. Mr. Marvin Lewis, a concerned member of the public, commented that it sounded as though the NRC and TVA were rushing through this process in an effort to get everything done. The NRC assured Mr. Lewis that the discussions of schedules and timelines are of minor importance to the NRC. The NRC's primary focus is the safety of the plant. The NRC will take as much time as needed to make a finding of reasonable assurance on the safety of the plant. Whether or not the NRC can complete its review along the same timeline as TVA is immaterial, though the NRC appreciates the information for its own awareness. Mr. Brian Paddock of the Tennessee Sierra Club asked the NRC to clarify whether the hearing opportunities have been exhausted for the WBN Unit 2 operating license application. NRC staff explained that a notice for an opportunity for hearing was published in 2009, and the deadlines for that has expired. In accordance with 10 CFR Part 2, on a case-by-case basis, the NRC will consider additional contentions, but they must be based on new and significant information.

No feedback forms were submitted at this meeting and no regulatory decisions were made at this meeting.

Please direct any inquiries to Justin Poole at 301-415-2048, or to justin.poole@nrc.gov.

Justin C. Poole, Senior Project Manager Watts Bar Special Projects Branch Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-391

Enclosures:

1. List of Attendees
2. Meeting Slides cc w/enclosures: Distribution via Listserv

LIST OF ATTENDEES Applicant: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Plant: Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN). Unit 2

Subject:

Licensing Milestones Date: December 18. 2014 Location: Teleconference Time: 8:30 a.m. - 10:00 a.m.

NAME TITLE ORGANIZATION U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)/Office of Nuclear Reactor Michele Evans Division Director Regulation (NRR)/Division of Operating Reactor Licensing (DORL)

Louise Lund Deputy Division Director NRC/NRR/DORL Sr. Project Manager, Watts Bar, NRC/NRR/DORL/Watts Bar Special Justin Poole Unit 2 Projects Branch (LPWB)

Anthony Minarik Project Manager NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB Mike Miernicki Project Manager NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB Project Manager, Watts Bar, Jeanne Dion NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB Unit 1 Region II/Division of Construction Robert Haag* Branch Chief Projects/Branch 3 Licensing and Engineering Gene Cobey TVA Management Director of Licensing, Gordon Arent TVA Watts Bar Steve Hilmes Engineering Management TVA Licensing and Engineering Laura Snyder TVA Manager Enclosure 1

NAME TITLE ORGANIZATION Licensing and Engineering Joe Calle Manager TVA Bob Bryan* Licensing TVA Marvin Lewis* Public Brian Paddock* Tennessee Sierra Club Ruth Thomas* Public

  • participated via teleconference

Enclosure 2 Meeting Slides

...... c c: 0

-a..ca *-ti>

ti)

l

.... 0 ca ti)

  • - v

- Cl)

(J

l cc;

~ N__

C)CO Cl) ::

z ...

ca .oQ)

.... s.. E ca en

... Q) u mc C)O Q) tn *-

...... ti>

...... c ca Cl) (.)

~ *-

_J

Ui1 Agenda

  • Licensing Communications
  • Substantially Complete Letter
  • Ready For Fuel Load Letter
  • Unit 2 Completion
  • Unit 2 - Key Milestone Linkages
  • Other Items of Interest Calle 2

ll!lil Substantially Complete Letter

  • Definition of Substantially Complete

- When the Owner takes responsibility

- T 0 - based on plant completion, not time to startup

  • Substantially Complete Letter timed to support notation paper

- allows Commission 60 days for review of notation paper

- approximately 90 days prior to fuel load

- Does this sequence work?

  • Letter will include a Readiness Assessment Report

- Readiness Assessment Report will provide inventory of TVA Quality Activities to construct, test, transition to dual unit operations

- Readiness Assessment Report will include high level list of remaining construction and testing activities to complete before fuel load Calle 3

ll!/il Substantially Complete Letter

- (1) Construction of the facility has been substantially completed, in conformity with the construction permit and the application as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; and

- (2) The facility will operate in conformity with the application as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; and

- (3) There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by the operating license can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the regulations in this chapter Calle 4

[i!] Substantially Complete Letter Substantially complete letter alignment to the sub-parts of 10 CFR 50.57 10CFR 50.57 Sub-part Substantially Complete Letter Section

( 1) Construction of the facility has been Attachment A 1- Current Schedule for Completion of substantially completed, in conformity with the Remaining Work construction permit and the application as Attachment A2 - Design Basis Verification amended, the provisions of the Act, and the Attachment A3 - Refurbishment Program Description rules and regulations of the Commission; and Attachment A4 - CAPs and SPs Attachment A5 - Status of New Generic Communications Attachment A6 - Status of Generic Communications Attachment A 7 - Quality Assurance Activities (2) The facility will operate in conformity with the Attachment 81 - Current Schedule for Completion of application as amended, the provisions of the the Test Program Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; and (3) There is reasonable assurance (i) that the Attachment C 1 - Department Transition and Change activities authorized by the operating license Management Plans can be conducted without endangering the Attachment C2 - Unit Differences - Design health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such Attachment C3 - Unit Differences - Training activities will be conducted in compliance with Attachment C4 - Safety Culture the regulations in this chapter 5

[i!/il Ready For Fuel Load Letter

  • Letter to be submitted just prior to fuel load

- Will include:

~ Schedule for testing - Startup and Power ascension

~ List of activities that need completion prior to fuel load

~ Exemptions and anticipated conditions of the license

- Will request quick turnaround

- Will request full power license

- Is there an implied linkage with the 94300 or other inspection process Calle 6

[i!/il Unit 2

  • Key Milestone Linkages Construction is Substantially Complete TVA Letter-All Systems and Construction is Integrated Safeguards Testing Areas turned over from Substantially Complete (final Mandatory MC TVA Letter Bechtel to TVA Complete 2513 inspection) Ready for Fuel Load TVA NRC 30 Day Mandatory FRN Fukushima ACRS Final NRR submits Commission Federal Register Region 2 finding- WRAG confirms all Orders Letter Notation Vote Decision to Notice of Intent (94300) Inspection licensing issues are Closed Paper Issue License to Issue license Program Complete resolved Calle 7

[i!/il Other Items of Interest

  • Connections between ORAT and Hot Functional Testing.
  • Federal Register Notice 30-day notice per 50.58(b)(2). [LIC-110, Sect 6.17]
  • Are there any other potential administrative process or procedural issues that should be addressed and included in the schedule?

Calle 8

en c

  • -....0 en Cl)
l a

PKG ML15043A310 Meetm;J Notice: ML 14349AO 0 6 Meetmg s ummary: ML15020A346 OFFICE OORL/LWBSP/PMiT DORL/LWBSP/PM DORL/LPL2-2/LAiT DORL/LWBSP/LA DORL/LWBSP/BC DORL/LWBSP/PM NAME AMinarik JPoole LRonewicz BClayton JQuichocho JPoole DATE 11/12/14 2/11/15 1/21/15 2/3/15 2/11/15 2/11/15