ML15271A338: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML15271A338
| number = ML15271A338
| issue date = 09/30/2015
| issue date = 09/30/2015
| title = Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1 - Review of the Fall 2014 Steam Generator Tube Inservice Inspection Report for Refueling Outage 28 (TAC No. MF6411)
| title = Review of the Fall 2014 Steam Generator Tube Inservice Inspection Report for Refueling Outage 28
| author name = Whited J A
| author name = Whited J
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| addressee name = Batson S
| addressee name = Batson S
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000269
| docket = 05000269
| license number = DPR-038
| license number = DPR-038
| contact person = Whited J A
| contact person = Whited J
| case reference number = TAC MF6411
| case reference number = TAC MF6411
| document type = Inservice/Preservice Inspection and Test Report, Letter
| document type = Inservice/Preservice Inspection and Test Report, Letter
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
| project = TAC:MF6411
| project = TAC:MF6411
| stage = Other
| stage = Approval
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Mr. Scott Batson Site Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 7800 Rochester Highway Seneca, SC 29672-0752 September 30, 2015
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 September 30, 2015 Mr. Scott Batson Site Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 7800 Rochester Highway Seneca, SC 29672-0752


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 -REVIEW OF THE FALL 2014 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSERVICE INSPECTION REPORT FOR REFUELING OUTAGE 28 (TAC NO. MF6411)  
OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 - REVIEW OF THE FALL 2014 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSERVICE INSPECTION REPORT FOR REFUELING OUTAGE 28 (TAC NO. MF6411)


==Dear Mr. Batson:==
==Dear Mr. Batson:==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff formally reviews all steam generator (SG) inservice inspection summary reports submitted by licensees in accordance with the plant's Technical Specification (TS) requirements. By letter dated March 6, 2015, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (the licensee), submitted information summarizing the results of the fall 2014 SG tube inspections performed at Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1. These inspections were performed during refueling outage 28. The NRC staff has completed its review of the information provided and concludes that the licensee provided the information required by their TSs and no additional follow-up is required at this time. The NRC staff's review is enclosed and concludes the review associated with TAC MF6411. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-4090 or via e-mail at Jeffrey.Whited@nrc.gov. Docket No. 50-269  
 
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff formally reviews all steam generator (SG) inservice inspection summary reports submitted by licensees in accordance with the plant's Technical Specification (TS) requirements. By letter dated March 6, 2015, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (the licensee), submitted information summarizing the results of the fall 2014 SG tube inspections performed at Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1. These inspections were performed during refueling outage 28.
The NRC staff has completed its review of the information provided and concludes that the licensee provided the information required by their TSs and no additional follow-up is required at this time. The NRC staff's review is enclosed and concludes the review associated with TAC MF6411.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-4090 or via e-mail at Jeffrey.Whited@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, Jeffrey A. Whited, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-269


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
As stated cc w/encls: Distribution via ListServ Sincerely, Jeffrey A. Whited, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION REVIEW OF THE 2014 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSERVICE INSPECTION REPORT PERFORMED DURING REFUELING OUTAGE 28 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS. LLC OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-269 By letter dated March 6, 2015, 1 Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (the licensee) submitted information summarizing the results of the fall 2014 steam generator (SG) tube inspections performed at the Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (ONS-1 ). These inspections were performed during refueling outage 28. ONS-1 has two replacement once-through steam generators (OTSGs) designed and fabricated by Babcock and Wilcox International. These OTSGs were put into service in 2004. Each OTSG has 15,631 thermally treated Alloy 690 tubes that have a nominal outside diameter of 0.625 inches and a nominal wall thickness of 0.038 inches. The tubes were hydraulically expanded into the tubesheet for 13 inches from the tube end. The tubesheet is 22 inches thick. The licensee provided the scope, extent, methods, and results of the OTSG tube inspections in the letter referenced above and the call referenced below. In addition, the licensee described corrective actions (i.e., tube plugging) taken in response to the inspection findings. On December 16, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the licensee held a conference call to discuss one indication of tube wear from a tube support plate (TSP) that was 59 percent through-wall (TW), which was slightly larger than the 57.6 percent predicted in the previous operational assessment.
 
* The indication of TSP wear was located in SG A, in the tube located in Row 16, Column 60 and at the 1 Oth TSP. The tube had adequate structural integrity and there was margin to the structural limit.
As stated cc w/encls: Distribution via ListServ
* In performing the previous operational assessment, the licensee had calculated the 95th percentile predicted growth rates for several indication populations. The 95th percentile predicted growth rate for the entire population of tube wear indications was 2.67 percent TW per effective full power year (EFPY). The 95th percentile predicted growth rate for the subset of tube wear indications that were greater than or equal to 10 percent TW, was 4.4 percent TW per EFPY. This was the growth rate used in the previous operational assessment (performed in 2012). The 95th percentile predicted growth rate 1 Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML 15072A185. Enclosure   for the subset of tube wear indications that were greater than or equal to 20 percent TW, was 7.7 percent TW per EFPY.
 
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION REVIEW OF THE 2014 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSERVICE INSPECTION REPORT PERFORMED DURING REFUELING OUTAGE 28 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS. LLC OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-269 By letter dated March 6, 2015, 1 Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (the licensee) submitted information summarizing the results of the fall 2014 steam generator (SG) tube inspections performed at the Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (ONS-1 ). These inspections were performed during refueling outage 28.
ONS-1 has two replacement once-through steam generators (OTSGs) designed and fabricated by Babcock and Wilcox International. These OTSGs were put into service in 2004. Each OTSG has 15,631 thermally treated Alloy 690 tubes that have a nominal outside diameter of 0.625 inches and a nominal wall thickness of 0.038 inches. The tubes were hydraulically expanded into the tubesheet for 13 inches from the tube end. The tubesheet is 22 inches thick.
The licensee provided the scope, extent, methods, and results of the OTSG tube inspections in the letter referenced above and the call referenced below. In addition, the licensee described corrective actions (i.e., tube plugging) taken in response to the inspection findings.
On December 16, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the licensee held a conference call to discuss one indication of tube wear from a tube support plate (TSP) that was 59 percent through-wall (TW), which was slightly larger than the 57.6 percent predicted in the previous operational assessment.
* The indication of TSP wear was located in SG A, in the tube located in Row 16, Column 60 and at the 1Oth TSP. The tube had adequate structural integrity and there was margin to the structural limit.
* In performing the previous operational assessment, the licensee had calculated the 95th percentile predicted growth rates for several indication populations. The 95th percentile predicted growth rate for the entire population of tube wear indications was 2.67 percent TW per effective full power year (EFPY). The 95th percentile predicted growth rate for the subset of tube wear indications that were greater than or equal to 10 percent TW, was 4.4 percent TW per EFPY. This was the growth rate used in the previous operational assessment (performed in 2012). The 95th percentile predicted growth rate 1 Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML15072A185.
Enclosure
 
for the subset of tube wear indications that were greater than or equal to 20 percent TW, was 7.7 percent TW per EFPY.
* The operational assessment for the current operating cycle used the 95th percentile predicted growth rate for the subset of tube wear indications that were greater than or equal to 20 percent through-wall. The 95th percentile growth rate was 7.1 percent TW per EFPY. If this method had been used for the prior operational assessment (performed in 2012), the current (2014) inspection results would have been conservatively predicted.
* The operational assessment for the current operating cycle used the 95th percentile predicted growth rate for the subset of tube wear indications that were greater than or equal to 20 percent through-wall. The 95th percentile growth rate was 7.1 percent TW per EFPY. If this method had been used for the prior operational assessment (performed in 2012), the current (2014) inspection results would have been conservatively predicted.
* The licensee stated that 14 percent TW per EFPY growth rate could have been used and the structural integrity performance criteria in the operational assessment for the current operating cycle would still be met.
* The licensee stated that 14 percent TW per EFPY growth rate could have been used and the structural integrity performance criteria in the operational assessment for the current operating cycle would still be met.
* The projected maximum indication at the next inspection is approximately 63 percent TW.
* The projected maximum indication at the next inspection is approximately 63 percent TW.
* The last operating cycle was the first 24-month operating cycle completed by ONS-1. Both ONS-2 and 3, have already completed one 24-month operating cycle. The licensee has transitioned to 24-month fuel cycles with SG tube inspections every refueling outage.
* The last operating cycle was the first 24-month operating cycle completed by ONS-1.
* The licensee stated that there was no tube-to-tube wear identified in the most recent SG inspections at ONS-1. On August 18, 2015, the licensee clarified the following regarding their report:
Both ONS-2 and 3, have already completed one 24-month operating cycle. The licensee has transitioned to 24-month fuel cycles with SG tube inspections every refueling outage.
* The licensee stated that there was no tube-to-tube wear identified in the most recent SG inspections at ONS-1.
On August 18, 2015, the licensee clarified the following regarding their report:
* The SGs have operated 102.1 effective full power months (EFPM) since the first inservice inspection after replacement. The SGs have operated a total of 116.9 EFPM since installation.
* The SGs have operated 102.1 effective full power months (EFPM) since the first inservice inspection after replacement. The SGs have operated a total of 116.9 EFPM since installation.
* There were 21,289 indications in 9,412 tubes in SG 1A and 17,612 indications in 9, 194 tubes in SG 1 B.
* There were 21,289 indications in 9,412 tubes in SG 1A and 17,612 indications in 9, 194 tubes in SG 1B.
* The number of indications in SG 1A has increased slightly. The number of indications in SG 1 B has remained essentially the same.
* The number of indications in SG 1A has increased slightly. The number of indications in SG 1B has remained essentially the same.
* Both the 95/50 and the average growth rates have decreased since the previous operating cycle.
* Both the 95/50 and the average growth rates have decreased since the previous operating cycle.
* The maximum indication noted was 59 percent TW, and was discussed with the NRC during the December 16, 2014, outage call. Based on the NRC staff's review of the information submitted by the licensee, the NRC staff has the following observations:
* The maximum indication noted was 59 percent TW, and was discussed with the NRC during the December 16, 2014, outage call.
Based on the NRC staff's review of the information submitted by the licensee, the NRC staff has the following observations:
* Wear with a relatively flat profile occurs in the inspection port regions of both SGs. The maximum flat wear depth seen in either SG was 20 percent TW.
* Wear with a relatively flat profile occurs in the inspection port regions of both SGs. The maximum flat wear depth seen in either SG was 20 percent TW.
* A small population of shallow wear indications was observed during refueling outage 28 at drilled hole locations at the 14th support plate. The deepest of these indications was 19 percent TW with a circumferential extent of 70 degrees and an axial length of 0.21 inches.
* A small population of shallow wear indications was observed during refueling outage 28 at drilled hole locations at the 14th support plate. The deepest of these indications was 19 percent TW with a circumferential extent of 70 degrees and an axial length of 0.21 inches.
* The NRC staff notes that the growth rates for wear indications generally decreases with increasing depth of wear indications. Based on a review of the information provided, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee provided the information required by their TSs. In addition, the NRC staff concludes that there are no technical issues that warrant follow-up action at this time since the inspections appear to be consistent with the objective of detecting potential tube degradation and the inspection results appear to be consistent with industry operating experience at similarly designed and operated units. Principal Contributor: Andrew Johnson, DE
* The NRC staff notes that the growth rates for wear indications generally decreases with increasing depth of wear indications.
Based on a review of the information provided, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee provided the information required by their TSs. In addition, the NRC staff concludes that there are no technical issues that warrant follow-up action at this time since the inspections appear to be consistent with the objective of detecting potential tube degradation and the inspection results appear to be consistent with industry operating experience at similarly designed and operated units.
Principal Contributor: Andrew Johnson, DE


ML 15271A338 *via memo dated OFFICE LPL2-1/PM LPL2-1/LA DE/ESGB NAME JWhited SFigueroa GKulesa* DATE 09/29/2015 09/29/2015 08/27/2015}}
ML15271A338            *via memo dated OFFICE     LPL2-1/PM         LPL2-1/LA         DE/ESGB           LPL2-1/BC        LPL2-1/PM NAME       JWhited           SFigueroa         GKulesa*         RPascarelli      JWhited DATE       09/29/2015       09/29/2015       08/27/2015        09/29/2015      09/30/2015}}

Latest revision as of 07:15, 31 October 2019

Review of the Fall 2014 Steam Generator Tube Inservice Inspection Report for Refueling Outage 28
ML15271A338
Person / Time
Site: Oconee Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/30/2015
From: Jeffrey Whited
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Batson S
Duke Energy Carolinas
Whited J
References
TAC MF6411
Download: ML15271A338 (5)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 September 30, 2015 Mr. Scott Batson Site Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 7800 Rochester Highway Seneca, SC 29672-0752

SUBJECT:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 - REVIEW OF THE FALL 2014 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSERVICE INSPECTION REPORT FOR REFUELING OUTAGE 28 (TAC NO. MF6411)

Dear Mr. Batson:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff formally reviews all steam generator (SG) inservice inspection summary reports submitted by licensees in accordance with the plant's Technical Specification (TS) requirements. By letter dated March 6, 2015, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (the licensee), submitted information summarizing the results of the fall 2014 SG tube inspections performed at Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1. These inspections were performed during refueling outage 28.

The NRC staff has completed its review of the information provided and concludes that the licensee provided the information required by their TSs and no additional follow-up is required at this time. The NRC staff's review is enclosed and concludes the review associated with TAC MF6411.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-4090 or via e-mail at Jeffrey.Whited@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, Jeffrey A. Whited, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-269

Enclosures:

As stated cc w/encls: Distribution via ListServ

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION REVIEW OF THE 2014 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSERVICE INSPECTION REPORT PERFORMED DURING REFUELING OUTAGE 28 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS. LLC OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-269 By letter dated March 6, 2015, 1 Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (the licensee) submitted information summarizing the results of the fall 2014 steam generator (SG) tube inspections performed at the Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (ONS-1 ). These inspections were performed during refueling outage 28.

ONS-1 has two replacement once-through steam generators (OTSGs) designed and fabricated by Babcock and Wilcox International. These OTSGs were put into service in 2004. Each OTSG has 15,631 thermally treated Alloy 690 tubes that have a nominal outside diameter of 0.625 inches and a nominal wall thickness of 0.038 inches. The tubes were hydraulically expanded into the tubesheet for 13 inches from the tube end. The tubesheet is 22 inches thick.

The licensee provided the scope, extent, methods, and results of the OTSG tube inspections in the letter referenced above and the call referenced below. In addition, the licensee described corrective actions (i.e., tube plugging) taken in response to the inspection findings.

On December 16, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the licensee held a conference call to discuss one indication of tube wear from a tube support plate (TSP) that was 59 percent through-wall (TW), which was slightly larger than the 57.6 percent predicted in the previous operational assessment.

  • The indication of TSP wear was located in SG A, in the tube located in Row 16, Column 60 and at the 1Oth TSP. The tube had adequate structural integrity and there was margin to the structural limit.
  • In performing the previous operational assessment, the licensee had calculated the 95th percentile predicted growth rates for several indication populations. The 95th percentile predicted growth rate for the entire population of tube wear indications was 2.67 percent TW per effective full power year (EFPY). The 95th percentile predicted growth rate for the subset of tube wear indications that were greater than or equal to 10 percent TW, was 4.4 percent TW per EFPY. This was the growth rate used in the previous operational assessment (performed in 2012). The 95th percentile predicted growth rate 1 Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML15072A185.

Enclosure

for the subset of tube wear indications that were greater than or equal to 20 percent TW, was 7.7 percent TW per EFPY.

  • The operational assessment for the current operating cycle used the 95th percentile predicted growth rate for the subset of tube wear indications that were greater than or equal to 20 percent through-wall. The 95th percentile growth rate was 7.1 percent TW per EFPY. If this method had been used for the prior operational assessment (performed in 2012), the current (2014) inspection results would have been conservatively predicted.
  • The licensee stated that 14 percent TW per EFPY growth rate could have been used and the structural integrity performance criteria in the operational assessment for the current operating cycle would still be met.
  • The projected maximum indication at the next inspection is approximately 63 percent TW.
  • The last operating cycle was the first 24-month operating cycle completed by ONS-1.

Both ONS-2 and 3, have already completed one 24-month operating cycle. The licensee has transitioned to 24-month fuel cycles with SG tube inspections every refueling outage.

  • The licensee stated that there was no tube-to-tube wear identified in the most recent SG inspections at ONS-1.

On August 18, 2015, the licensee clarified the following regarding their report:

  • The SGs have operated 102.1 effective full power months (EFPM) since the first inservice inspection after replacement. The SGs have operated a total of 116.9 EFPM since installation.
  • There were 21,289 indications in 9,412 tubes in SG 1A and 17,612 indications in 9, 194 tubes in SG 1B.
  • The number of indications in SG 1A has increased slightly. The number of indications in SG 1B has remained essentially the same.
  • Both the 95/50 and the average growth rates have decreased since the previous operating cycle.
  • The maximum indication noted was 59 percent TW, and was discussed with the NRC during the December 16, 2014, outage call.

Based on the NRC staff's review of the information submitted by the licensee, the NRC staff has the following observations:

  • Wear with a relatively flat profile occurs in the inspection port regions of both SGs. The maximum flat wear depth seen in either SG was 20 percent TW.
  • A small population of shallow wear indications was observed during refueling outage 28 at drilled hole locations at the 14th support plate. The deepest of these indications was 19 percent TW with a circumferential extent of 70 degrees and an axial length of 0.21 inches.
  • The NRC staff notes that the growth rates for wear indications generally decreases with increasing depth of wear indications.

Based on a review of the information provided, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee provided the information required by their TSs. In addition, the NRC staff concludes that there are no technical issues that warrant follow-up action at this time since the inspections appear to be consistent with the objective of detecting potential tube degradation and the inspection results appear to be consistent with industry operating experience at similarly designed and operated units.

Principal Contributor: Andrew Johnson, DE

ML15271A338 *via memo dated OFFICE LPL2-1/PM LPL2-1/LA DE/ESGB LPL2-1/BC LPL2-1/PM NAME JWhited SFigueroa GKulesa* RPascarelli JWhited DATE 09/29/2015 09/29/2015 08/27/2015 09/29/2015 09/30/2015