ML17160A183: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/08/2017
| issue date = 08/08/2017
| title = NRC Response to Virgil C. Summer, Unit 1, Disputed Notice of Non-Cited Violation 05000395/2017201-01
| title = NRC Response to Virgil C. Summer, Unit 1, Disputed Notice of Non-Cited Violation 05000395/2017201-01
| author name = Bailey M G
| author name = Bailey M
| author affiliation = NRC/NSIR/DSO
| author affiliation = NRC/NSIR/DSO
| addressee name = Lippard G
| addressee name = Lippard G
Line 16: Line 16:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000395/2017201]]
See also: [[see also::IR 05000395/2017201]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION  
{{#Wiki_filter:OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
                                          August 8, 2017
 
EA-17-070
  August 8, 2017  
Mr. George Lippard III, Vice President Nuclear Operations
South Carolina Electric & Gas Company
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1
P.O. Box 88, Mail Code 800
EA-17-070  
Jenkinsville, SC 29065
SUBJECT:        THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION RESPONSE TO
Mr. George Lippard III, Vice President Nuclear Operations  
                DISPUTED NOTICE OF NON-CITED VIOLATION 05000395/2017201-01
South Carolina Electric & Gas Company  
Dear Mr. Lippard:
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 P.O. Box 88, Mail Code 800 Jenkinsville, SC 29065
Thank you for your letter dated April 6, 2017, in response to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) Security Inspection Report 05000395/2017201, issued on March 10, 2017.
In your response, you contested that the responders acted appropriately in accordance with
established site procedures and, therefore, did demonstrate the appropriate use of force. You
additionally requested that Exercise One be characterized as successful rather than
indeterminate.
We appreciate the information you provided. Upon consideration of that information, the Office
of Nuclear Security and Incident Response has determined that the documented violation did
not occur and the exercise should be characterized as successful. A revised inspection report
will be issued reflecting these decisions. The enclosure to this letter provides the basis for our
conclusion.
  Enclosure transmitted herewith contains SUNSI. When separated from enclosure, this
  transmittal document is decontrolled.
                OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION


                OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
SUBJECT: THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION RESPONSE TO DISPUTED NOTICE OF NON-CITED VIOLATION 05000395/2017201-01  
G. Lippard                                          2
Dear Mr. Lippard:
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 2.390 of the NRCs
Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the
NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of the NRCs
Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible
from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic
Reading Room)
                                                Sincerely,
                                                /RA A. Pretzello for/
                                                Marissa G. Bailey, Director
                                                Division of Security Operations
                                                Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
Docket No. 50-395
License No. NFP-12
Non-Public Enclosure:
NRC Response to Disputed Non-cited
  Violation 05000395/2017201-01
cc: G. Douglass, Site Security Manager
                OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION


Thank you for your letter dated April 6, 2017, in response to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) Security Inspection Report 05000395/2017201, issued on March 10, 2017. 
In your response, you contested that the responders acted appropriately in accordance with established site procedures and, therefore, did demonstrate the appropriate use of force.  You additionally requested that Exercise One be characterized as successful rather than


indeterminate.  We appreciate the information you provided.  Upon consideration of that information, the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response has determined that the documented violation did not occur and the exercise should be characterized as successful.  A revised inspection report will be issued reflecting these decisions.  The enclosure to this letter provides the basis for our
  ML17160A183                       *NCP-2017-009
 
OFFICE           NSIR/DSO/SPEB       OE                   NSIR/DSO/SPEB   NSIR/DSO
conclusion.
NAME             J. Willis - NC*     D. Furst (via email) R. Johnson - NC* M. Bailey (A.
                                                                            Pretzello for)
DATE             7/3/17             8/3/17               7/3/17           8/ 8 /17
Enclosure transmitted herewith contains SUNSI.  When separated from enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled. 
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
G. Lippard 2
 
OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the
 
NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).  ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic
Reading Room)
Sincerely,
/RA A. Pretzello for/
Marissa G. Bailey, Director
 
Division of Security Operations
Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
Docket No. 50-395 License No. NFP-12
 
   
Non-Public Enclosure: 
NRC Response to Disputed Non-cited  Violation 05000395/2017201-01
cc: G. Douglass, Site Security Manager 
 
  ML17160A183   *NCP-2017-009 OFFICE NSIR/DSO/SPEB OE NSIR/DSO/SPEB NSIR/DSO NAME J. Willis - NC* D. Furst (via email) R. Johnson - NC* M. Bailey (A. Pretzello for) DATE 7/3/17 8/3/17 7/3/17 8/ 8 /17
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 03:14, 30 October 2019

NRC Response to Virgil C. Summer, Unit 1, Disputed Notice of Non-Cited Violation 05000395/2017201-01
ML17160A183
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 08/08/2017
From: Marissa Bailey
Division of Security Operations
To: Lippard G
South Carolina Electric & Gas Co
Joe Willis
Shared Package
ML17177A070 List:
References
EA-17-070 IR 2017201
Download: ML17160A183 (2)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000395/2017201

Text

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

August 8, 2017

EA-17-070

Mr. George Lippard III, Vice President Nuclear Operations

South Carolina Electric & Gas Company

Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1

P.O. Box 88, Mail Code 800

Jenkinsville, SC 29065

SUBJECT: THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION RESPONSE TO

DISPUTED NOTICE OF NON-CITED VIOLATION 05000395/2017201-01

Dear Mr. Lippard:

Thank you for your letter dated April 6, 2017, in response to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC) Security Inspection Report 05000395/2017201, issued on March 10, 2017.

In your response, you contested that the responders acted appropriately in accordance with

established site procedures and, therefore, did demonstrate the appropriate use of force. You

additionally requested that Exercise One be characterized as successful rather than

indeterminate.

We appreciate the information you provided. Upon consideration of that information, the Office

of Nuclear Security and Incident Response has determined that the documented violation did

not occur and the exercise should be characterized as successful. A revised inspection report

will be issued reflecting these decisions. The enclosure to this letter provides the basis for our

conclusion.

Enclosure transmitted herewith contains SUNSI. When separated from enclosure, this

transmittal document is decontrolled.

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

G. Lippard 2

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 2.390 of the NRCs

Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the

NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of the NRCs

Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible

from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic

Reading Room)

Sincerely,

/RA A. Pretzello for/

Marissa G. Bailey, Director

Division of Security Operations

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response

Docket No. 50-395

License No. NFP-12

Non-Public Enclosure:

NRC Response to Disputed Non-cited

Violation 05000395/2017201-01

cc: G. Douglass, Site Security Manager

OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

ML17160A183 *NCP-2017-009

OFFICE NSIR/DSO/SPEB OE NSIR/DSO/SPEB NSIR/DSO

NAME J. Willis - NC* D. Furst (via email) R. Johnson - NC* M. Bailey (A.

Pretzello for)

DATE 7/3/17 8/3/17 7/3/17 8/ 8 /17

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17160A183&oldid=2007167"