ML17328A473: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 09/21/1990
| issue date = 09/21/1990
| title = LER 90-010-00:on 900824,discovered That Routing of Cable Associated W/Local Shutdown Indication Panels Not in Compliance w/10CFR50,App R.Caused by Insufficient Scoping for Design Changes.Program revised.W/901016 Ltr
| title = LER 90-010-00:on 900824,discovered That Routing of Cable Associated W/Local Shutdown Indication Panels Not in Compliance w/10CFR50,App R.Caused by Insufficient Scoping for Design Changes.Program revised.W/901016 Ltr
| author name = BLIND A A, BREWER S J
| author name = Blind A, Brewer S
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM, Qj REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ESSION NBR:9010160022 DOC.DATE:" 90/09/21 NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATED                                                                 SYSTEM, DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION Qj REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
NO DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana&05000315 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BREWER,S.J.
ESSION NBR:9010160022             DOC.DATE:" 90/09/21 NOTARIZED: NO             DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana & 05000315 AUTH. NAME           AUTHOR AFFILIATION BREWER,S.J.           Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana & Michigan Ele BLIND,A.A.           Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana & Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME           RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana&Michigan Ele BLIND,A.A.
Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana&Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
LER 90-010-00:on 900824,10CFR50 App R deficiencies due to potential loss of local shutdown indication panel function.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED LTR 1 ENCL SIZE TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Tncident Rpt, etc.NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 LA COLBURN,T.
LER   90-010-00:on 900824,10CFR50 App           R deficiencies due to potential loss of local           shutdown   indication panel function.
INTERNAL: ACNW AEOD/DSP/TPAB NRR/DET/ECMB 9H NRR/DLPQ/LHFBll NRR/DOEA/OEAB11 NRR/DST/SELB 8D RR/gg/S3?LBBD1 REG FIL~02 GN3 TILE 01 EXTERNAL EG&G BRYCE i J H NRC PDR NSIC MURPHY,G.A COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 PD AEOD/DOA AEOD/ROAB/DS P NRR/DET/EMEB 7E NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 NRR/DREP/PRPB11 NRR/DST/SICB 7E NRR/DST/SRXB 8E RES/DSIR/EIB L ST LOBBY WARD NSIC MAYS,G NUDOCS FULL TXT COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOTBTO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED LTR                 1 ENCL     SIZE TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Tncident Rpt, etc.
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE!CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 31 ENCL 31 Indiana Michigan~Power Company Cook Nuclear Plant P.O.Box 458 Bridgman.I'Jll 49106 616 465 590t INDIANA NICHIGiAN POWER September 21, 1990 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Rockville, Maryland 20852 Operating Licenses DPR-58 Docket No.50-315Document Control Manager: In accordance with the criteria established by 10 CFR 50.73 entitled Licensee Event Re ortin S stem, the following report is being submitted:
NOTES:
90-010-00 Sincerely, A.A.Blind Plant Manager AAB:clj Attachment A'O (r HCQ (ii, Q OO.GlA cc: D.H.Williams, Jr.A.B.Davis, Region III M.P.Alexich P.A.Barrett J.E.Borggren R.F.Kroeger B.Walters-Ft.Wayne NRC Resident Inspector J.G.Giitter, NRC J.G.Keppler M.R.Padgett G.'harnoff, Esq.Dottie Sherman, ANI Library D.Hahn INPO S.J.Brewer/B.P.
RECIPIENT               COPIES            RECIPIENT          COPIES ID   CODE/NAME           LTTR ENCL        ID CODE/NAME      LTTR ENCL PD3-1 LA                     1    1      PD3-1 PD              1    1 COLBURN,T.                   1    1 INTERNAL: ACNW                           2    2    AEOD/DOA                1    1 AEOD/DSP/TPAB               1    1    AEOD/ROAB/DS P          2    2 NRR/DET/ECMB 9H             1    1      NRR/DET/EMEB 7E        1    1 NRR/DLPQ/LHFBll             1    1      NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10        1    1 NRR/DOEA/OEAB11             1    1      NRR/DREP/PRPB11        2    2 NRR/DST/SELB 8D             1    1    NRR/DST/SICB 7E        1    1 RR/gg/S3?LBBD1             1    1    NRR/DST/SRXB 8E        1    1 REG GN3 FIL~TILE 01 02        1 1
Lauzau B.A.Svensson/gg$
1 1
NRC SORM 366 (669)U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)LITY NAME (1)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 APPROVED 0M B NO.31504)104 EXPIRES: 4(30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REOUESTI 500 HAS.FOAWAAD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P630), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31500104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET.WASHINGTON, DC 20503.DOCKET NUMBER (21 PA E 3 0 5 o o o3 15 icF05 10CFR50 Appendix R Deficiencies Resulting in Potential Loss of Local Shutdown Indication Panel Function i EVENT DATE (51 LER NUMBER (6)REPORT DATE (7)OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (6)MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR g@SEOUENTIAL NUMBER'/we~tcevteloN.4oc NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR PACILITY NAMES D.C.Cook, Unit 2 DOCKET NUMBER(SI 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 8 24 9090 010 0 0 09 2190 0 5 0 0 0 0 PE RATING MODE (9)POWER LEYEL 1 0 0 X~.n Pv.~v":,'p..ix cx.S.$@THIS REI'ORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE RLOUIREMENTS OF 10 cFR (): (Cneck one or more oi the follow(op) l111 50.73(e I (2)I le)50.73(e)(2)(r) 20.405(c)EOM(c1(11 50.36(cl)21 20.402(bl 20.406(e)()
RES/DSIR/EIB            1    1 EXTERNAL   EG&G BRYCE i J H             3     3     L ST LOBBY WARD        1   1 NRC PDR                      1     1     NSIC MAYS,G             1   1 NSIC MURPHY,G.A              1     1     NUDOCS FULL TXT        1   1 NOTBTO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
l(l)20.40S(e I)1)I 4)20.405(el(1)(4l) 20.405(e)lllllr)20.405(c))1)(rl 50.73(el(2)(r4)60,73(e)12)(rl4)(Al 50,73(e)(2)lrBI)(61 50.73(e)(2)(xl 50.73(c)(2)ii)X 50.73(el(2)(4) 50.73(e)(2)I BI)LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)73.71(bl 73.71(cl OTHER ISpeciry in Abttrect oeiowend/n Text IIRC Form 366AJ NAME S.J.Brewer, Nuclear Safety and Licensin Section Manager TELEPHONE NUMBER AREA CODE 614 223-2 20 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBEO IN THIS REPORT (13)CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC.TURER CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC TUREA TO NPRDS 5%MD)i SVPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)YES III yn, complete EXPECTED SIIOMISSIOII DATE)NO ABSTRACT (Limit to teOO tpecn, Ee., epproximetely Iiftnn tinpie tpece typewriven tinct)(16)EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATF.(151 MONTH DAY YEAR On August 24, 1990 with Unit One operating at 100 percent power and Unit Two in Node Six, it was discovered that the routing of cable associated with the Unit One Local Shutdown Indication (LSI)panels was not in ax)pliance with 10CFR50 Appendix R.On September 6, 1990, it was subsequently discovered that a similar condition existed for the Unit Two LSI panels.The imnediate corrective action taken was initiation of plant aedifications to bring the subject plant cabling into canpliance with 10CFR50 Appendix R.All identified areas are provided with adequate fire detection and suppression to substantially mitigate the impact of a fire on normal and LSI instrumentation.
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
Therefore, the event should not have presented a significant hazard to the public health and safety.NRC Form 366 (64)9)
FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR               31   ENCL   31
NAC FOAM 388A (84)9)US.NUCLEAR REGULATOAY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVED 0MB NO.31600104 EXPIRES;4/30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER AESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COL(.ECTION AEQUESTI 504)HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BUADEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P4)30), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON.
DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31600104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT'AND BUDGET,WASHINGTON, DC 20503, FACILITY NAME (1)DOCKET NUMBER (2)LEA NUMBER (Si SEQUENTIAL NVMSER REVISION NVMSER PAGE 13)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1'tEXT///moro t/NCS/4 rtr/Ir/rtd, oto 4/f)foot/HRC Forrrr 3854'4/l(7)0 5 0 0 0 3 1 5 9 0 010 0 0 OF Conditions Prior to Occurrence Unit 1 in Mode 1 at 100 percent Rated Thermal~Unit 2 in Mode 6.Descri tion of Event On August 24, 1990, it was discovered that the routing of cables associated with the Unit One Local Shutdown Indication (LSI)panels was not in ccmpliance with 10CFR50 Appendix R requirements., A postulated fire in any of three Unit One fire areas could have resulted in an inability to maintain power to the LSI panels.The following describes the analysis performed.
Unit 1 Fire Areas 40 (Zone 41), 48 (Zone 55), and 49 (Zone 56).The area analyses performed identified that a fire in any one of these fire areas could have eliminated both the Unit 1 and Unit 2~to the Local Shutdown Indication (LSI)panels.The discrepant cable in question was cable 1-29685G (EIIS/ED-CBL3) which runs between panels 1-LSI-6 and 1-LSI-6X.A fault of this cable due to a fire would have eliminated the Unit 2 Alternate feed to the Unit 1 LSI panels.The Unit 1 normal power feed to the LSI panels was already assumed lost for a fire in'any of these areas because various cables associated with the availability of MCC 1-ABC-B would have been lost.On September 6, 1990, it was subsequently discovered that a similar condition existed for the Unit, Two LSI panels.A postulated fire in one of the Unit Two fire areas-could have resulted in an inability to maintain power to the LSI panels.The following describes the analysis performed.
Unit 2 Fire Area 29 (Zones 24, 25).The area analyses performed identified that a fire in fire zone 24 would have faulted both the Unit 1 and Unit 2 power to the LSI panels.The discrepant cable in question was cable 1-1936R (EIIS/ED-CBL3).
This Unit 1 alternate power source to the Unit 2 LSI panels runs in fire zone 24 which also contains the Unit 2 normal source cable 2-12467 (EIIS/ED-CBL3).
Although 2-12467 also runs in zone 25, 1-1936R does not.Fire zones 24 and 25 are separated by a three-hour fire-rated wall.NRC Form 388A (84)9)


NRC FORM 358A (589)US.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COlhMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVED OMB NO.31500104 EXPIRESI 4130f92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST)50i)HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (Ph)30), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.
Indiana Michigan Power Company
WASHINGTON.
                              ~
DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31500104).
Cook Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 458 Bridgman. I'Jll 49106 616 465 590t INDIANA NICHIGiAN POWER September            21, 1990 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Rockville, Maryland                20852 Operating Licenses DPR-58 Docket No. 50-315 Document            Control Manager:
OFFICE OF MANAGEME'NT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.FACILITY NAME (1)DOCKET NUMBER (2)LE R NUMB E R (5)YEAR@P SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REVISION NUMBER PAGE (3)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 TEXT lit Irroro Eooco IS roerf)od.B44 oddi(ior>>I NRC form 36643)(Il)0 5 0 0 0 3]5 9 0 010 00 03 oF0 Cause of Event The condition was the result of insufficient scoping for 10CFR50 Appendix R design changes.Insufficient controls were in place to ensure that new cables added to the plant cm)plied with 10CFR50 Appendix R requirements.
In accordance with the criteria established by 10 CFR 50.73 entitled Licensee Event Re ortin S stem, the following report is being submitted:
Anal sis of Event This event is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73 (a)(2)(ii)(B)and 10CFR50.73 (a)(2)(ii)(C)in that the condition was outside the design basis and not covered by the plant's operating and emergency procedures respectively.
90-010-00 Sincerely, A.A. Blind Plant Manager AAB:clj Attachment cc:      D.H. Williams,         Jr.
Unit 1 Fire Areas 40, 48, and 49 Analysis.a.Fire Area 40: Our Safe Shutdown System Analysis (SSSA)shows that for a fire in area 40 control room indications equivalent to those found on the LSI cabinet would be lost.Due to cable misrouting, the LSI panel indications would also have been lost.Further investigation revealed the reason that the control roan indication would have been lost is because one of the alternate sources to the CRID panels, the isolixreters, is located in this area.What the SSSA does not shcFAT is that the preferred source to the CRID panels would have been available.
A.B. Davis, Region          III M.P. Alexich P.A. Barrett A'O          J.E. Borggren (r
The inverters are located in fire area 41 (fire zone 42C).Therefore, normal control room indication of process rmnitoring would have been available for fire in Area 40.b.Fire Areas 48 and 49: Under conservative assumptions of loss of function for an area fire, the SSSA shows that for a fire in areas 48 and 49 both the control room and the LSI panel indications would, have been lost.However, fire areas 48 and 49 are provided with adequate suppression and detection to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation.
R.F. Kroeger HCQ                B. Walters  Ft. Wayne (ii, Q OO                NRC Resident Inspector
NRC Form 358A ($89)
. GlA              J.G. Giitter,         NRC J.G. Keppler M.R. Padgett G.'harnoff,         Esq.
Dottie        Sherman, ANI  Library D. Hahn INPO S.J. Brewer/B.P. Lauzau B.A. Svensson
                                                                          /gg$


NAC FORM 368A)689)U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COI4MISSI ON LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION APPAOVEO OMB NO.31600'104 EXPIRES: 4/30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 600 HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH IF@30), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, OC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT 131504104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.FACILITY NAME 11I DOCKET NUMBER 12)YEAR LER NUMBER)8)Sf DUE NTIAL NUMBER IIEVISION NUMSEII PAGE (3)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 TEXT/I/more epece/4 mr)II/red.
NRC SORM 366                                                                      U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (669)                                                                                                                                                  APPROVED 0M B NO. 31504)104 EXPIRES: 4(30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REOUESTI 500 HAS. FOAWAAD LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)                                                                COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P630), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31500104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENTAND BUDGET. WASHINGTON, DC 20503.
Iree eddidone//VRC Farm 3664'4/117) o 5 o o o 3 1590 0 1 0-000 4 oF 05 Anal sis of Event Unit 2 Fire Area 29 (Zones 24 and 25)Analysis: According to our Safe Shutdown Systems Analysis, a fire in area'9 would not have eliminated process nanitoring indication in the control room for steam generators 1 and 4.The following indication would have been available in the Unit 2 control room: 2-BLP-112 2-BLP-142 2MPP-210 2-MPP-240 2-N31 SG 1 Water Level (normal range)SG 4 Water Level (normal range)1 SG 1 Pressure SG 4 Pressure Source Range Ronitoring Channel 1 2-NLP-151 or 2-NLP-153 Pressurizer Water Level 2-NPS-121 RCS Pressure (wide range)These indications could provide an indirect means of determine RCS temperature.
LITY NAME (1)                                                                                                                          DOCKET NUMBER (21                          PA E 3 D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1                                                                                                            0      5    o  o      o3 15 icF05 10CFR50 Appendix R Deficiencies Resulting                                                in Potential            Loss          of Local            Shutdown Indication Panel Function i  EVENT DATE (51                      LER NUMBER (6)                              REPORT DATE (7)                            OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (6)
This area is provided with adequate detection and suppression to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation.
MONTH            DAY      YEAR    YEAR          SEOUENTIAL '/we~ tcevteloN                      DAY                        PACILITY NAMES                          DOCKET NUMBER(SI g@        NUMBER        .4oc NUMBER MONTH                      YEAR D.C. Cook, Unit 2                                  0  5  0    0  0    3 0 8          24        9090                    010                    0    0  09 2190                                                                          0  5  0    0  0 THIS REI'ORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE RLOUIREMENTS OF 10 cFR (): (Cneck one or more                      oi the follow(op) l111 0 PE RATING MODE (9)                    20.402(bl                                    20.405(c)                            50.73(e I (2) I le )                            73.71(bl POWER                            20.406(e)() l(l)                              EOM(c1(11                            50.73(e)(2)(r)                                  73.71(cl LEYEL 1    0 0        20.40S(e I )1) I 4)                          50.36(cl)21                          50.73(el(2) (r4)                                OTHER ISpeciry in Abttrect oeiowend/n Text IIRC Form 20.405(el(1)(4l)                              50.73(c) (2) ii)                      60,73(e) 12)(rl4) (Al                          366AJ
Conclusion In conclusion, the condition did not adversely impact the health and safety of the public due to the fact that areas 40, 48, and 49 of Unit 1 and Area 29 of Unit 2 are provided with suppression and detection to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation.
                            ~v":,                lllllr)
Also, a large portion of the station normal instrumentation would remain functional since fires propagate at a finite rate rather than causing an instantaneous loss of function for an entire area.NRC Form 388A (689)
    'p    ..ix n X  ~
NRC FORM 366A (64)9)U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVED OMB NO.3)504))04 EXPIRESI 4(30(92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REOUESTI 502)HRS.FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P4)30), U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, OC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK RFDUCTION PROJECT (3)504)104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.FACILITY NAME O)DOCKET NUMBER (2)YEAR LER NUMBER (6)SEQUENTIAL NVMSSR REVISION NVMSER PAGE (3)D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 TEXT ill mom spsso Is ssqoPsd.oss sddicionsl IYRC FomI 3664'sl (17)o s o o o 315 9 0 010 00 05 OF 0 5 Corrective Actions Unit One A plant Temporary Modification was initiated which installed a 1 ampere fuse in 1-LSI-6 on the load side of the 1-29685G cable.This way a fire in the fire areas of concern would not eliminate the ability of providing Unit 2 power to the LSI panels.Unit Two A plant Minor Modification was initiated to provide a one-hour fire enclosure around the conduit 2-12467 that exists in fire zone 24.There is suppression and detection in the area.Conduit 2-12467 was in 10CFR50 Appendix R compliance on 9/20/90.General Our program for ensuring continued 10CFR50 Appendix R compliance will be revised.It is anticipated that this revision will be in place by March 1, 1991.FB1 led nent Identification None.Previous Similar Events 050-315/90-008:
                  . Pv.            20.405(e) 20.405(c) )1) (rl X  50.73(el(2)(4)                        50,73(e) (2) lrBI)(61 cx.S  .  $@                                                                    50.73(e) (2) I BI)                    50.73(e) (2) (xl LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
10CFR50 Appendix R deficiencies resulting in potential loss of auto-start of service water pumps due to incorrect implementation of design change.NR C Form 366A (64)9) l}}
NAME                                                                                                                                                                TELEPHONE NUMBER AREA CODE S.J. Brewer, Nuclear Safety and Licensin                                                          Section Manager                                614 223 -2                                20 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBEO IN THIS REPORT (13)
CAUSE        SYSTEM      COMPONENT        MANUFAC.                                                                                                MANUFAC TURER                                                      CAUSE  SYSTEM  COMPONENT TUREA            TO NPRDS 5%MD)i SVPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)                                                                                        MONTH    DAY      YEAR EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATF. (151 YES    IIIyn, complete EXPECTED SIIOMISSIOII DATE)                                        NO ABSTRACT (Limit to teOO tpecn, Ee., epproximetely          Iiftnn tinpie tpece typewriven tinct)  (16)
On    August 24, 1990 with Unit One operating                                                at  100  percent power and Unit                                Two in Node Six, it was discovered that the routing of cable associated with the Unit One Local Shutdown Indication (LSI) panels was not in ax)pliance with 10CFR50 Appendix R.                          On    September 6, 1990, it was subsequently discovered that      a  similar condition                          existed for the Unit Two LSI panels.
The imnediate              corrective action taken was initiation of plant aedifications to bring the subject plant cabling into canpliance with 10CFR50 Appendix R.
All identified areas are provided with adequate fire detection and suppression to substantially mitigate the impact of a fire on normal and LSI instrumentation. Therefore, the event should not have presented a significant hazard to the public health and safety.
NRC Form 366 (64)9)
 
NAC FOAM 388A                                                                  US. NUCLEAR REGULATOAY COMMISSION (84) 9)                                                                                                                        APPROVED 0MB NO. 31600104 EXPIRES; 4/30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER AESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)                                                INFORMATION COL(.ECTION AEQUESTI 504) HRS. FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BUADEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS TEXT CONTINUATION                                                    AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P4)30), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON. DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31600104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT'ANDBUDGET,WASHINGTON, DC 20503, FACILITY NAME (1)                                                                    DOCKET NUMBER (2)                    LEA NUMBER (Si                  PAGE 13)
SEQUENTIAL      REVISION NVMSER        NVMSER D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit
'tEXT ///moro t/NCS /4 rtr/Ir/rtd, oto 4 /f)foot/HRC Forrrr 3854'4/ l(7) 1            0  5  0  0  0  3  1  5  9 0        010            0 0            OF Conditions Prior to Occurrence Unit Unit 1
2 in Mode in Mode 1
6.
at    100    percent Rated Thermal            ~
Descri tion                    of  Event On      August 24, 1990,                        it    was discovered that the routing of cables associated Unit One Local Shutdown Indication (LSI) panels was not in ccmpliance with the with 10CFR50 Appendix                                  R requirements., A postulated fire in any of three Unit One fire areas could have resulted in an inability to maintain power to the LSI panels. The following describes the analysis performed.
Unit          1    Fire Areas                40 (Zone      41),      48 (Zone      55), and    49 (Zone      56).
The area analyses                          performed areas could have eliminated both the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Shutdown Indication (LSI) panels.
identified that The cable 1-29685G (EIIS/ED-CBL3) which runs between panels 1-LSI-6 and 1-LSI-6X.
a discrepant fire in cable
                                                                                                                            ~
any one in of  these to the Local question        was fire A fault of this cable due to a fire would have eliminated the Unit 2 Alternate feed to the Unit 1 LSI panels. The Unit 1 normal power feed to the LSI panels was already assumed lost for a fire in 'any of these areas because various cables associated with the availability of MCC 1-ABC-B would have been lost.
On September condition existed 6, 1990,              it was subsequently discovered that a similar for the Unit, Two LSI panels. A postulated fire in one                                      of the Unit Two fire                            areas-could          have  resulted      in  an  inability        to    maintain power to the LSI panels.                                  The following describes the analysis performed.
Unit          2    Fire Area              29 (Zones 24,            25).
The area analyses                            performed        identified that          a fire in fire zone 24 would have          faulted both the Unit                        1  and Unit 2 power to the LSI panels. The discrepant cable in question was cable 1-1936R (EIIS/ED-CBL3). This Unit 1 alternate power source to the Unit 2 LSI panels runs in fire zone 24 which also contains the Unit 2 normal source cable 2-12467 (EIIS/ED-CBL3). Although 2-12467 also runs in zone 25, 1-1936R does not. Fire zones 24 and 25 are separated by a three-hour fire-rated wall.
NRC Form 388A (84)9)
 
NRC FORM 358A                                                              US. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COlhMISSION (589)                                                                                                                        APPROVED OMB NO. 31500104 EXPIRESI 4130f92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)                                             INFORMATION  COLLECTION  REQUEST) 50i) HRS. FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS TEXT CONTINUATION                                               AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (Ph)30), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. WASHINGTON. DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31500104). OFFICE OF MANAGEME'NTAND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.
FACILITYNAME (1)                                                                DOCKET NUMBER (2)                    LE R NUMBE R (5)                  PAGE (3)
YEAR      SEQUENTIAL      REVISION
                                                                                                                    @P      NUMBER        NUMBER D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit TEXT litIrroro Eooco IS roerf)od. B44 oddi(ior>>I NRC form 36643) 1        0  5  0  0  0  3 ] 5      9 0        010            00 03            oF0 (Il)
Cause          of Event The        condition              was    the result of insufficient scoping for 10CFR50 Appendix                                    R design changes.                        Insufficient controls were in place to ensure that new cables added to the plant cm)plied with 10CFR50 Appendix R requirements.
Anal sis              of Event This event                  is    being reported          in accordance with 10CFR50.73 (a) (2) (ii) (B) and 10CFR50.73 (a) (2) (ii) (C) in that the condition was outside the design basis and not covered by the plant's operating and emergency procedures respectively.
Unit        1  Fire Areas 40, 48,                  and 49    Analysis.
: a.        Fire Area 40:
Our Safe Shutdown System Analysis (SSSA) shows that for a fire in area 40 control room indications equivalent to those found on the LSI cabinet would be lost. Due to cable misrouting, the LSI panel indications would also have been lost.
Further investigation revealed the reason that the control roan indication would have been lost is because one of the alternate sources to the CRID panels, the isolixreters, is located in this area. What the SSSA does not shcFAT is that the preferred source to the CRID panels would have been available. The inverters are located in fire area 41 (fire zone 42C). Therefore, normal control room indication of process rmnitoring would have been available for fire in Area 40.
: b.          Fire Areas            48 and 49:
Under conservative assumptions                      of loss of function for an area fire,        the    SSSA shows    that for      a  fire in areas 48 and 49 both the control room and the LSI panel indications would, have been lost.
However, fire areas 48 and 49 are provided with adequate suppression and detection to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation.
NRC Form 358A ($89)
 
NAC FORM 368A                                                              U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COI4MISSION
  )689)                                                                                                                        APPAOVEO OMB NO. 31600'104 EXPIRES: 4/30/92 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)                                              ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 600 HRS. FORWARD TEXT CONTINUATION                                                  COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH IF@30), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, OC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT 131504104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENTAND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.
FACILITYNAME 11I                                                                 DOCKET NUMBER 12)                     LER NUMBER )8)                     PAGE (3)
YEAR      Sf DUE NTIAL     IIEVISION NUMBER         NUMSEII D.C. Cook Nuclear                           Plant, Unit TEXT /I/ more epece /4 mr)II/red. Iree eddidone//VRC Farm 3664'4/117) 1          o   5   o o   o 3     1590             0     1 0 000               4 oF     05 Anal sis               of Event Unit         2     Fire Area           29 (Zones 24 and 25)             Analysis:
According to our Safe Shutdown Systems Analysis, a fire in area'9 would not have eliminated process nanitoring indication in the control room for steam generators 1 and 4. The following indication would have been available in the Unit 2 control room:
2-BLP-112                   SG 1   Water Level (normal range) 2-BLP-142                  SG 4   Water Level (normal range) 1 2MPP-210                    SG 1   Pressure 2-MPP-240                  SG 4   Pressure 2-N31                      Source Range Ronitoring Channel                   1 2-NLP-151           or 2-NLP-153                   Pressurizer Water Level 2-NPS-121                   RCS Pressure       (wide range)
These           indications could provide                       an indirect means of determine RCS temperature.                     This area         is provided with adequate detection and suppression to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation.
Conclusion In conclusion, the condition did not adversely impact the health and safety of the public due to the fact that areas 40, 48, and 49 of Unit 1 and Area 29 of Unit 2 are provided with suppression and detection to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation. Also, a large portion of the station normal instrumentation would remain functional since fires propagate at a finite rate rather than causing an instantaneous loss of function for an entire area.
NRC Form 388A (689)
 
NRC FORM 366A                                                           U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (64)9)                                                                                                                   APPROVED OMB NO. 3)504))04 EXPIRESI 4(30(92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)                                            INFORMATION COLLECTION REOUESTI 502) HRS. FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS TEXT CONTINUATION                                                AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P4)30), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, OC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK RFDUCTION PROJECT (3)504)104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENTAND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.
FACILITYNAME O)                                                               DOCKET NUMBER (2)                   LER NUMBER (6)                   PAGE (3)
YEAR      SEQUENTIAL      REVISION NVMSSR        NVMSER D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit                                   1       o  s  o  o  o  315      9 0        010            00 05            OF  0  5 TEXT illmom spsso Is ssqoPsd. oss sddicionsl IYRC FomI 3664'sl (17)
Corrective Actions Unit       One A   plant Temporary Modification was initiated which installed a 1 ampere fuse in 1-LSI-6 on the load side of the 1-29685G cable. This way a fire in the fire areas of concern would not eliminate the ability of providing Unit 2 power to the LSI panels.
Unit       Two A   plant Minor Modification was initiated to provide a one-hour fire enclosure around the conduit 2-12467 that exists in fire zone 24. There is suppression and detection in the area. Conduit 2-12467 was in 10CFR50 Appendix             R   compliance on 9/20/90.
General Our program                 for ensuring continued 10CFR50 Appendix R compliance will be revised.               It is anticipated that this revision will be in place by March                                             1, 1991.
FB1 led                     nent Identification None.
Previous Similar Events 050-315/90-008:                               10CFR50 Appendix R deficiencies resulting in potential loss of auto-start of service water pumps due to incorrect implementation of design change.
NR C Form 366A (64)9)
 
l}}

Latest revision as of 06:07, 29 October 2019

LER 90-010-00:on 900824,discovered That Routing of Cable Associated W/Local Shutdown Indication Panels Not in Compliance w/10CFR50,App R.Caused by Insufficient Scoping for Design Changes.Program revised.W/901016 Ltr
ML17328A473
Person / Time
Site: Cook American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 09/21/1990
From: Blind A, Brewer S
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
LER-90-010, LER-90-10, NUDOCS 9010160022
Download: ML17328A473 (10)


Text

ACCELERATED SYSTEM, DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION Qj REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ESSION NBR:9010160022 DOC.DATE:" 90/09/21 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana & 05000315 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BREWER,S.J. Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana & Michigan Ele BLIND,A.A. Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana & Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SUBJECT:

LER 90-010-00:on 900824,10CFR50 App R deficiencies due to potential loss of local shutdown indication panel function.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED LTR 1 ENCL SIZE TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Tncident Rpt, etc.

NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD3-1 LA 1 1 PD3-1 PD 1 1 COLBURN,T. 1 1 INTERNAL: ACNW 2 2 AEOD/DOA 1 1 AEOD/DSP/TPAB 1 1 AEOD/ROAB/DS P 2 2 NRR/DET/ECMB 9H 1 1 NRR/DET/EMEB 7E 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/LHFBll 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 1 1 NRR/DOEA/OEAB11 1 1 NRR/DREP/PRPB11 2 2 NRR/DST/SELB 8D 1 1 NRR/DST/SICB 7E 1 1 RR/gg/S3?LBBD1 1 1 NRR/DST/SRXB 8E 1 1 REG GN3 FIL~TILE 01 02 1 1

1 1

RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 EXTERNAL EG&G BRYCE i J H 3 3 L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC MAYS,G 1 1 NSIC MURPHY,G.A 1 1 NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 1 NOTBTO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 31 ENCL 31

Indiana Michigan Power Company

~

Cook Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 458 Bridgman. I'Jll 49106 616 465 590t INDIANA NICHIGiAN POWER September 21, 1990 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Rockville, Maryland 20852 Operating Licenses DPR-58 Docket No. 50-315 Document Control Manager:

In accordance with the criteria established by 10 CFR 50.73 entitled Licensee Event Re ortin S stem, the following report is being submitted:

90-010-00 Sincerely, A.A. Blind Plant Manager AAB:clj Attachment cc: D.H. Williams, Jr.

A.B. Davis, Region III M.P. Alexich P.A. Barrett A'O J.E. Borggren (r

R.F. Kroeger HCQ B. Walters Ft. Wayne (ii, Q OO NRC Resident Inspector

. GlA J.G. Giitter, NRC J.G. Keppler M.R. Padgett G.'harnoff, Esq.

Dottie Sherman, ANI Library D. Hahn INPO S.J. Brewer/B.P. Lauzau B.A. Svensson

/gg$

NRC SORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (669) APPROVED 0M B NO. 31504)104 EXPIRES: 4(30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REOUESTI 500 HAS. FOAWAAD LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P630), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31500104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENTAND BUDGET. WASHINGTON, DC 20503.

LITY NAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (21 PA E 3 D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 0 5 o o o3 15 icF05 10CFR50 Appendix R Deficiencies Resulting in Potential Loss of Local Shutdown Indication Panel Function i EVENT DATE (51 LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (6)

MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEOUENTIAL '/we~ tcevteloN DAY PACILITY NAMES DOCKET NUMBER(SI g@ NUMBER .4oc NUMBER MONTH YEAR D.C. Cook, Unit 2 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 8 24 9090 010 0 0 09 2190 0 5 0 0 0 THIS REI'ORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE RLOUIREMENTS OF 10 cFR (): (Cneck one or more oi the follow(op) l111 0 PE RATING MODE (9) 20.402(bl 20.405(c) 50.73(e I (2) I le ) 73.71(bl POWER 20.406(e)() l(l) EOM(c1(11 50.73(e)(2)(r) 73.71(cl LEYEL 1 0 0 20.40S(e I )1) I 4) 50.36(cl)21 50.73(el(2) (r4) OTHER ISpeciry in Abttrect oeiowend/n Text IIRC Form 20.405(el(1)(4l) 50.73(c) (2) ii) 60,73(e) 12)(rl4) (Al 366AJ

~v":, lllllr)

'p ..ix n X ~

. Pv. 20.405(e) 20.405(c) )1) (rl X 50.73(el(2)(4) 50,73(e) (2) lrBI)(61 cx.S . $@ 50.73(e) (2) I BI) 50.73(e) (2) (xl LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)

NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER AREA CODE S.J. Brewer, Nuclear Safety and Licensin Section Manager 614 223 -2 20 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBEO IN THIS REPORT (13)

CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC. MANUFAC TURER CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT TUREA TO NPRDS 5%MD)i SVPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14) MONTH DAY YEAR EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATF. (151 YES IIIyn, complete EXPECTED SIIOMISSIOII DATE) NO ABSTRACT (Limit to teOO tpecn, Ee., epproximetely Iiftnn tinpie tpece typewriven tinct) (16)

On August 24, 1990 with Unit One operating at 100 percent power and Unit Two in Node Six, it was discovered that the routing of cable associated with the Unit One Local Shutdown Indication (LSI) panels was not in ax)pliance with 10CFR50 Appendix R. On September 6, 1990, it was subsequently discovered that a similar condition existed for the Unit Two LSI panels.

The imnediate corrective action taken was initiation of plant aedifications to bring the subject plant cabling into canpliance with 10CFR50 Appendix R.

All identified areas are provided with adequate fire detection and suppression to substantially mitigate the impact of a fire on normal and LSI instrumentation. Therefore, the event should not have presented a significant hazard to the public health and safety.

NRC Form 366 (64)9)

NAC FOAM 388A US. NUCLEAR REGULATOAY COMMISSION (84) 9) APPROVED 0MB NO. 31600104 EXPIRES; 4/30/92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER AESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) INFORMATION COL(.ECTION AEQUESTI 504) HRS. FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BUADEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS TEXT CONTINUATION AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P4)30), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON. DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31600104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT'ANDBUDGET,WASHINGTON, DC 20503, FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) LEA NUMBER (Si PAGE 13)

SEQUENTIAL REVISION NVMSER NVMSER D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit

'tEXT ///moro t/NCS /4 rtr/Ir/rtd, oto 4 /f)foot/HRC Forrrr 3854'4/ l(7) 1 0 5 0 0 0 3 1 5 9 0 010 0 0 OF Conditions Prior to Occurrence Unit Unit 1

2 in Mode in Mode 1

6.

at 100 percent Rated Thermal ~

Descri tion of Event On August 24, 1990, it was discovered that the routing of cables associated Unit One Local Shutdown Indication (LSI) panels was not in ccmpliance with the with 10CFR50 Appendix R requirements., A postulated fire in any of three Unit One fire areas could have resulted in an inability to maintain power to the LSI panels. The following describes the analysis performed.

Unit 1 Fire Areas 40 (Zone 41), 48 (Zone 55), and 49 (Zone 56).

The area analyses performed areas could have eliminated both the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Shutdown Indication (LSI) panels.

identified that The cable 1-29685G (EIIS/ED-CBL3) which runs between panels 1-LSI-6 and 1-LSI-6X.

a discrepant fire in cable

~

any one in of these to the Local question was fire A fault of this cable due to a fire would have eliminated the Unit 2 Alternate feed to the Unit 1 LSI panels. The Unit 1 normal power feed to the LSI panels was already assumed lost for a fire in 'any of these areas because various cables associated with the availability of MCC 1-ABC-B would have been lost.

On September condition existed 6, 1990, it was subsequently discovered that a similar for the Unit, Two LSI panels. A postulated fire in one of the Unit Two fire areas-could have resulted in an inability to maintain power to the LSI panels. The following describes the analysis performed.

Unit 2 Fire Area 29 (Zones 24, 25).

The area analyses performed identified that a fire in fire zone 24 would have faulted both the Unit 1 and Unit 2 power to the LSI panels. The discrepant cable in question was cable 1-1936R (EIIS/ED-CBL3). This Unit 1 alternate power source to the Unit 2 LSI panels runs in fire zone 24 which also contains the Unit 2 normal source cable 2-12467 (EIIS/ED-CBL3). Although 2-12467 also runs in zone 25, 1-1936R does not. Fire zones 24 and 25 are separated by a three-hour fire-rated wall.

NRC Form 388A (84)9)

NRC FORM 358A US. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COlhMISSION (589) APPROVED OMB NO. 31500104 EXPIRESI 4130f92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST) 50i) HRS. FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS TEXT CONTINUATION AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (Ph)30), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. WASHINGTON. DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (31500104). OFFICE OF MANAGEME'NTAND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.

FACILITYNAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) LE R NUMBE R (5) PAGE (3)

YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION

@P NUMBER NUMBER D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit TEXT litIrroro Eooco IS roerf)od. B44 oddi(ior>>I NRC form 36643) 1 0 5 0 0 0 3 ] 5 9 0 010 00 03 oF0 (Il)

Cause of Event The condition was the result of insufficient scoping for 10CFR50 Appendix R design changes. Insufficient controls were in place to ensure that new cables added to the plant cm)plied with 10CFR50 Appendix R requirements.

Anal sis of Event This event is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73 (a) (2) (ii) (B) and 10CFR50.73 (a) (2) (ii) (C) in that the condition was outside the design basis and not covered by the plant's operating and emergency procedures respectively.

Unit 1 Fire Areas 40, 48, and 49 Analysis.

a. Fire Area 40:

Our Safe Shutdown System Analysis (SSSA) shows that for a fire in area 40 control room indications equivalent to those found on the LSI cabinet would be lost. Due to cable misrouting, the LSI panel indications would also have been lost.

Further investigation revealed the reason that the control roan indication would have been lost is because one of the alternate sources to the CRID panels, the isolixreters, is located in this area. What the SSSA does not shcFAT is that the preferred source to the CRID panels would have been available. The inverters are located in fire area 41 (fire zone 42C). Therefore, normal control room indication of process rmnitoring would have been available for fire in Area 40.

b. Fire Areas 48 and 49:

Under conservative assumptions of loss of function for an area fire, the SSSA shows that for a fire in areas 48 and 49 both the control room and the LSI panel indications would, have been lost.

However, fire areas 48 and 49 are provided with adequate suppression and detection to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation.

NRC Form 358A ($89)

NAC FORM 368A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COI4MISSION

)689) APPAOVEO OMB NO. 31600'104 EXPIRES: 4/30/92 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 600 HRS. FORWARD TEXT CONTINUATION COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH IF@30), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, OC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT 131504104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENTAND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.

FACILITYNAME 11I DOCKET NUMBER 12) LER NUMBER )8) PAGE (3)

YEAR Sf DUE NTIAL IIEVISION NUMBER NUMSEII D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit TEXT /I/ more epece /4 mr)II/red. Iree eddidone//VRC Farm 3664'4/117) 1 o 5 o o o 3 1590 0 1 0 000 4 oF 05 Anal sis of Event Unit 2 Fire Area 29 (Zones 24 and 25) Analysis:

According to our Safe Shutdown Systems Analysis, a fire in area'9 would not have eliminated process nanitoring indication in the control room for steam generators 1 and 4. The following indication would have been available in the Unit 2 control room:

2-BLP-112 SG 1 Water Level (normal range) 2-BLP-142 SG 4 Water Level (normal range) 1 2MPP-210 SG 1 Pressure 2-MPP-240 SG 4 Pressure 2-N31 Source Range Ronitoring Channel 1 2-NLP-151 or 2-NLP-153 Pressurizer Water Level 2-NPS-121 RCS Pressure (wide range)

These indications could provide an indirect means of determine RCS temperature. This area is provided with adequate detection and suppression to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation.

Conclusion In conclusion, the condition did not adversely impact the health and safety of the public due to the fact that areas 40, 48, and 49 of Unit 1 and Area 29 of Unit 2 are provided with suppression and detection to substantially mitigate the impact on normal and LSI instrumentation. Also, a large portion of the station normal instrumentation would remain functional since fires propagate at a finite rate rather than causing an instantaneous loss of function for an entire area.

NRC Form 388A (689)

NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (64)9) APPROVED OMB NO. 3)504))04 EXPIRESI 4(30(92 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) INFORMATION COLLECTION REOUESTI 502) HRS. FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS TEXT CONTINUATION AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (P4)30), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, OC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK RFDUCTION PROJECT (3)504)104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENTAND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.

FACILITYNAME O) DOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (6) PAGE (3)

YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION NVMSSR NVMSER D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 o s o o o 315 9 0 010 00 05 OF 0 5 TEXT illmom spsso Is ssqoPsd. oss sddicionsl IYRC FomI 3664'sl (17)

Corrective Actions Unit One A plant Temporary Modification was initiated which installed a 1 ampere fuse in 1-LSI-6 on the load side of the 1-29685G cable. This way a fire in the fire areas of concern would not eliminate the ability of providing Unit 2 power to the LSI panels.

Unit Two A plant Minor Modification was initiated to provide a one-hour fire enclosure around the conduit 2-12467 that exists in fire zone 24. There is suppression and detection in the area. Conduit 2-12467 was in 10CFR50 Appendix R compliance on 9/20/90.

General Our program for ensuring continued 10CFR50 Appendix R compliance will be revised. It is anticipated that this revision will be in place by March 1, 1991.

FB1 led nent Identification None.

Previous Similar Events 050-315/90-008: 10CFR50 Appendix R deficiencies resulting in potential loss of auto-start of service water pumps due to incorrect implementation of design change.

NR C Form 366A (64)9)

l