ML14336A575: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 12/02/2014
| issue date = 12/02/2014
| title = LTR-14-0412-1 - E-mail to Thomas Saporito for Update 2.206 - Florida Power & Light Company (Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 and 4)
| title = LTR-14-0412-1 - E-mail to Thomas Saporito for Update 2.206 - Florida Power & Light Company (Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 and 4)
| author name = Klett A L
| author name = Klett A
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
| addressee name = Saporito T
| addressee name = Saporito T
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000250, 05000251
| docket = 05000250, 05000251
| license number = DPR-031, DPR-041
| license number = DPR-031, DPR-041
| contact person = Klett A L DORL/LPL2-2 301-415-0489
| contact person = Klett A DORL/LPL2-2 301-415-0489
| case reference number = 2.206, LTR-14-0412-1
| case reference number = 2.206, LTR-14-0412-1
| package number = ML14202A521
| package number = ML14202A521
Line 21: Line 21:
==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Hi Mr. Saporito, Klett, Audrey Tuesday, December 02, 2014 8:33 AM saprodani@gmail.com Banic, Merrilee; Chereskin, Alexander Update on your 2.206 Petition re. Turkey Point The NRC's Petition Review Board (PRB) met to discuss your 2.206 petition and recommends to accept a portion of your petition for further review under the 2.206 process. Specifically, the PRB recommends to accept the portion of the petition related to the root cause of the increased cooling canal temperatures for further review under the 2.206 process. Because the NRC staff evaluated and reached resolution on the remaining portions of the petition, the PRB recommends not accepting the remaining portions of the petition for further review in the 2.206 process. For the reasons discussed in the NRC's safety evaluation for the amendments issued to Turkey Point on August 8, 2014, the PRB recommends not granting your request to maintain Turkey Point in a cold shutdown mode of operation.
Hi Mr. Saporito, Klett, Audrey Tuesday, December 02, 2014 8:33 AM saprodani@gmail.com Banic, Merrilee; Chereskin, Alexander Update on your 2.206 Petition re. Turkey Point The NRC's Petition Review Board (PRB) met to discuss your 2.206 petition and recommends to accept a portion of your petition for further review under the 2.206 process. Specifically, the PRB recommends to accept the portion of the petition related to the root cause of the increased cooling canal temperatures for further review under the 2.206 process. Because the NRC staff evaluated and reached resolution on the remaining portions of the petition, the PRB recommends not accepting the remaining portions of the petition for further review in the 2.206 process. For the reasons discussed in the NRC's safety evaluation for the amendments issued to Turkey Point on August 8, 2014, the PRB recommends not granting your request to maintain Turkey Point in a cold shutdown mode of operation.
As documented in Section 40A3.2 of NRC's Integrated Inspection Report No. 05000250(251)/2014004, dated October 23, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 14296A129), the NRC staff opened an Unresolved Item that documents the staff's plans to inspect the licensee's root cause of the cooling canal conditions and associated corrective actions. The staff intends to complete its inspection activities by March 31, 2015, and issue its associated inspection report within 45 days of that date. After completion of the NRC's inspection activities and issuance of the associated report, the staff will determine the resolution of your 2.206 petition.
As documented in Section 40A3.2 of NRC's Integrated Inspection Report No. 05000250(251)/2014004, dated October 23, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14296A129), the NRC staff opened an Unresolved Item that documents the staff's plans to inspect the licensee's root cause of the cooling canal conditions and associated corrective actions. The staff intends to complete its inspection activities by March 31, 2015, and issue its associated inspection report within 45 days of that date. After completion of the NRC's inspection activities and issuance of the associated report, the staff will determine the resolution of your 2.206 petition.
NRC's Management Directive 8.11 provides you the opportunity to comment on the PRB's recommendations via a meeting or teleconference.
NRC's Management Directive 8.11 provides you the opportunity to comment on the PRB's recommendations via a meeting or teleconference.
Please let me know if you wish to do so. Audrey Klett Project Manager N RR/DORL/LPLII-2 301-415-0489 1}}
Please let me know if you wish to do so. Audrey Klett Project Manager N RR/DORL/LPLII-2 301-415-0489 1}}

Revision as of 07:01, 21 June 2019

LTR-14-0412-1 - E-mail to Thomas Saporito for Update 2.206 - Florida Power & Light Company (Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 and 4)
ML14336A575
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/02/2014
From: Audrey Klett
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Saporito T
Public Commenter
Klett A DORL/LPL2-2 301-415-0489
Shared Package
ML14202A521 List:
References
2.206, LTR-14-0412-1
Download: ML14336A575 (1)
v • d • e


Text

From: Sent: To: Cc:

Subject:

Hi Mr. Saporito, Klett, Audrey Tuesday, December 02, 2014 8:33 AM saprodani@gmail.com Banic, Merrilee; Chereskin, Alexander Update on your 2.206 Petition re. Turkey Point The NRC's Petition Review Board (PRB) met to discuss your 2.206 petition and recommends to accept a portion of your petition for further review under the 2.206 process. Specifically, the PRB recommends to accept the portion of the petition related to the root cause of the increased cooling canal temperatures for further review under the 2.206 process. Because the NRC staff evaluated and reached resolution on the remaining portions of the petition, the PRB recommends not accepting the remaining portions of the petition for further review in the 2.206 process. For the reasons discussed in the NRC's safety evaluation for the amendments issued to Turkey Point on August 8, 2014, the PRB recommends not granting your request to maintain Turkey Point in a cold shutdown mode of operation.

As documented in Section 40A3.2 of NRC's Integrated Inspection Report No. 05000250(251)/2014004, dated October 23, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14296A129), the NRC staff opened an Unresolved Item that documents the staff's plans to inspect the licensee's root cause of the cooling canal conditions and associated corrective actions. The staff intends to complete its inspection activities by March 31, 2015, and issue its associated inspection report within 45 days of that date. After completion of the NRC's inspection activities and issuance of the associated report, the staff will determine the resolution of your 2.206 petition.

NRC's Management Directive 8.11 provides you the opportunity to comment on the PRB's recommendations via a meeting or teleconference.

Please let me know if you wish to do so. Audrey Klett Project Manager N RR/DORL/LPLII-2 301-415-0489 1

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14336A575&oldid=1725236"