ML16272A189: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/03/2016
| issue date = 10/03/2016
| title = Correction to Amendment Nos. 203 (Unit 1) and 199 (Unit 2)
| title = Correction to Amendment Nos. 203 (Unit 1) and 199 (Unit 2)
| author name = Williams S A
| author name = Williams S
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| addressee name = Pierce C R
| addressee name = Pierce C
| addressee affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| docket = 05000348, 05000364
| docket = 05000348, 05000364
| license number = NPF-002, NPF-008
| license number = NPF-002, NPF-008
| contact person = Williams S A, DORL/LPLII-1, 415-1009
| contact person = Williams S, DORL/LPLII-1, 415-1009
| document type = Letter, Technical Specifications
| document type = Letter, Technical Specifications
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
Line 21: Line 21:


==Dear Mr. Pierce:==
==Dear Mr. Pierce:==
In a letter dated August 3, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 15233A448), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued Amendment No. 203 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-2 and Amendment No. 199 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-8 for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively.
In a letter dated August 3, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15233A448), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued Amendment No. 203 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-2 and Amendment No. 199 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-8 for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively.
The amendments included changes to 63 technical specifications (TSs) pages. TS pages 3.5.5-1 and 3.5.5-2 were inadvertently included to be replaced.
The amendments included changes to 63 technical specifications (TSs) pages. TS pages 3.5.5-1 and 3.5.5-2 were inadvertently included to be replaced.
However, as stated in the safety evaluation, the request related to these TS pages was withdrawn in the Southern Nuclear Company, Inc., letter dated September 28, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 15271 A223). The correct TS page 3.5.5-1 corresponds to Amendment No. 146 (Unit 1) and Amendment No. 137 (Unit 2) that can be found in ADAMS Package Accession No. ML993500022 and attached.
However, as stated in the safety evaluation, the request related to these TS pages was withdrawn in the Southern Nuclear Company, Inc., letter dated September 28, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15271A223). The correct TS page 3.5.5-1 corresponds to Amendment No. 146 (Unit 1) and Amendment No. 137 (Unit 2) that can be found in ADAMS Package Accession No. ML993500022 and attached.
The correct TS page 3.5.5-2 corresponds to Amendment No. 185, (Unit 1 ), and Amendment No. 180, (Unit 2), that can be found in ADAMS Accession No. ML 11167 A226 and attached.
The correct TS page 3.5.5-2 corresponds to Amendment No. 185, (Unit 1 ), and Amendment No. 180, (Unit 2), that can be found in ADAMS Accession No. ML11167A226 and attached.
Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 Distribution via Listserv Sincerely, Shawn A. Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Seal Injection Flow 3.5.5 3.5 EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS (ECCS) 3.5.5 Seal Injection Flow LCO 3.5.5 Reactor coolant pump seal injection flow shall be within limits. APPLICABILITY:
Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 Distribution via Listserv Sincerely, Shawn A. Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Seal Injection Flow 3.5.5 3.5 EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS (ECCS) 3.5.5 Seal Injection Flow LCO 3.5.5 Reactor coolant pump seal injection flow shall be within limits. APPLICABILITY:
MODES 1, 2, and 3. ACTIONS CONDITION A. Seal injection flow not A.1 within limit. B. Required Action and B.1 associated Completion Time not met. AND B.2 Farley Units 1 and 2 REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME Adjust manual seal 4 hours injection throttle valves in accordance with SR 3.5.5.1. Be in MODE3. Be in MODE4. 3.5.5-1 6 hours 12 hours Amendment No. 146 (Unit 1) Amendment No. 137 (Unit 2)
MODES 1, 2, and 3. ACTIONS CONDITION A. Seal injection flow not A.1 within limit. B. Required Action and B.1 associated Completion Time not met. AND B.2 Farley Units 1 and 2 REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME Adjust manual seal 4 hours injection throttle valves in accordance with SR 3.5.5.1. Be in MODE3. Be in MODE4. 3.5.5-1 6 hours 12 hours Amendment No. 146 (Unit 1) Amendment No. 137 (Unit 2)
Line 37: Line 37:


==Dear Mr. Pierce:==
==Dear Mr. Pierce:==
In a letter dated August 3, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 15233A448), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued Amendment No. 203 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-2 and Amendment No. 199 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-8 for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively.
In a letter dated August 3, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15233A448), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued Amendment No. 203 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-2 and Amendment No. 199 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-8 for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively.
The amendments included changes to 63 technical specifications (TSs) pages. TS pages 3.5.5-1 and 3.5.5-2 were inadvertently included to be replaced.
The amendments included changes to 63 technical specifications (TSs) pages. TS pages 3.5.5-1 and 3.5.5-2 were inadvertently included to be replaced.
However, as stated in the safety evaluation, the request related to these TS pages was withdrawn in the Southern Nuclear Company, Inc., letter dated September 28, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 15271A223).
However, as stated in the safety evaluation, the request related to these TS pages was withdrawn in the Southern Nuclear Company, Inc., letter dated September 28, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15271A223).
The correct TS page 3.5.5-1 corresponds to Amendment No. 146 (Unit 1) and Amendment No. 137 (Unit 2) that can be found in ADAMS Package Accession No. ML993500022 and attached.
The correct TS page 3.5.5-1 corresponds to Amendment No. 146 (Unit 1) and Amendment No. 137 (Unit 2) that can be found in ADAMS Package Accession No. ML993500022 and attached.
The correct TS page 3.5.5-2 corresponds to Amendment No. 185, (Unit 1), and Amendment No. 180, (Unit 2), that can be found in ADAMS Accession No. ML 11167 A226 and attached.
The correct TS page 3.5.5-2 corresponds to Amendment No. 185, (Unit 1), and Amendment No. 180, (Unit 2), that can be found in ADAMS Accession No. ML11167A226 and attached.
Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC RidsNrrLALRonewicz Resource RidsNrrPMFarley Resource LPL2-1 R/F Sincerely, IRA/ Shawn A. Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsNrrDssStsb Resource RidssNrrDorllpl2-1 Resource RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsRgn2MailCenter Resource RecordsAmend ADAMS Accession No.: ML 16272A189 OFFICE DORL/LPL2-1/PM DORL/LPL2-1  
PUBLIC RidsNrrLALRonewicz Resource RidsNrrPMFarley Resource LPL2-1 R/F Sincerely, IRA/ Shawn A. Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsNrrDssStsb Resource RidssNrrDorllpl2-1 Resource RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsRgn2MailCenter Resource RecordsAmend ADAMS Accession No.: ML16272A189 OFFICE DORL/LPL2-1/PM DORL/LPL2-1  
/LA DORL/LPL2-1  
/LA DORL/LPL2-1  
/BC DORL/LPL2-1  
/BC DORL/LPL2-1  
/PM NAME SWilliams LRonewicz MMarkley SWilliams DATE 9/29/2016 9/28/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}
/PM NAME SWilliams LRonewicz MMarkley SWilliams DATE 9/29/2016 9/28/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}

Revision as of 23:09, 19 June 2019

Correction to Amendment Nos. 203 (Unit 1) and 199 (Unit 2)
ML16272A189
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 10/03/2016
From: Shawn Williams
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Pierce C
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
Williams S, DORL/LPLII-1, 415-1009
References
Download: ML16272A189 (4)
v • d • e


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 3, 2016 Mr. C. R. Pierce Regulatory Affairs Director Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. P.O. Box 1295 Bin 038 Birmingham, AL 35201-1295

SUBJECT:

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 -CORRECTION TO AMENDMENT NOS. 203 (UNIT 1) AND 199 (UNIT 2)

Dear Mr. Pierce:

In a letter dated August 3, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15233A448), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued Amendment No. 203 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-2 and Amendment No. 199 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-8 for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively.

The amendments included changes to 63 technical specifications (TSs) pages. TS pages 3.5.5-1 and 3.5.5-2 were inadvertently included to be replaced.

However, as stated in the safety evaluation, the request related to these TS pages was withdrawn in the Southern Nuclear Company, Inc., letter dated September 28, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15271A223). The correct TS page 3.5.5-1 corresponds to Amendment No. 146 (Unit 1) and Amendment No. 137 (Unit 2) that can be found in ADAMS Package Accession No. ML993500022 and attached.

The correct TS page 3.5.5-2 corresponds to Amendment No. 185, (Unit 1 ), and Amendment No. 180, (Unit 2), that can be found in ADAMS Accession No. ML11167A226 and attached.

Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 Distribution via Listserv Sincerely, Shawn A. Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Seal Injection Flow 3.5.5 3.5 EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS (ECCS) 3.5.5 Seal Injection Flow LCO 3.5.5 Reactor coolant pump seal injection flow shall be within limits. APPLICABILITY:

MODES 1, 2, and 3. ACTIONS CONDITION A. Seal injection flow not A.1 within limit. B. Required Action and B.1 associated Completion Time not met. AND B.2 Farley Units 1 and 2 REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME Adjust manual seal 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> injection throttle valves in accordance with SR 3.5.5.1. Be in MODE3. Be in MODE4. 3.5.5-1 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> 12 hours Amendment No. 146 (Unit 1) Amendment No. 137 (Unit 2)

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SR 3.5.2.1 SR 3.5.2.2 SR 3.52.3 SR 3.5.2.4 SURVEILLANCE Only required to be performed for valves 8132A and 81328 when Centrifugal Charging Pump A is Inoperable.

Verify the following valves are in the listed position with power to the valve operator removed. Number Position 8884, 8886 Closed 8132A, 81320 Open 8689 Closed Function Centrifugal Charging Pump to RCS Hot Leg Centrifugal Charging Pump discharge isolation RHR to RCS Hot Leg Injection Verify each ECCS manual, power operated, and automatic valve in the flow path. that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, is in the correct position.

Verify each ECCS pump's developed head at the test flow point is greater than or equal to the required developed head. Verify each ECCS automatic valve in the flow path that is not locked. sealed, or otherwise secured in position, actuates to the correct position on an actual or simulated actuation signal.

Mr. C. R. Pierce Regulatory Affairs Director October 3, 2016 Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. P.O. Box 1295 Bin 038 Birmingham, AL 35201-1295

SUBJECT:

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 -CORRECTION TO AMENDMENT NOS. 203, (UNIT 1 ), AND 199, (UNIT 2)

Dear Mr. Pierce:

In a letter dated August 3, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15233A448), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued Amendment No. 203 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-2 and Amendment No. 199 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-8 for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively.

The amendments included changes to 63 technical specifications (TSs) pages. TS pages 3.5.5-1 and 3.5.5-2 were inadvertently included to be replaced.

However, as stated in the safety evaluation, the request related to these TS pages was withdrawn in the Southern Nuclear Company, Inc., letter dated September 28, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15271A223).

The correct TS page 3.5.5-1 corresponds to Amendment No. 146 (Unit 1) and Amendment No. 137 (Unit 2) that can be found in ADAMS Package Accession No. ML993500022 and attached.

The correct TS page 3.5.5-2 corresponds to Amendment No. 185, (Unit 1), and Amendment No. 180, (Unit 2), that can be found in ADAMS Accession No. ML11167A226 and attached.

Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsNrrLALRonewicz Resource RidsNrrPMFarley Resource LPL2-1 R/F Sincerely, IRA/ Shawn A. Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsNrrDssStsb Resource RidssNrrDorllpl2-1 Resource RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsRgn2MailCenter Resource RecordsAmend ADAMS Accession No.: ML16272A189 OFFICE DORL/LPL2-1/PM DORL/LPL2-1

/LA DORL/LPL2-1

/BC DORL/LPL2-1

/PM NAME SWilliams LRonewicz MMarkley SWilliams DATE 9/29/2016 9/28/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16272A189&oldid=1708224"