Latest revision as of 22:23, 17 March 2019

Text

Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report, Appendix C - Area Walk-by Checklists (Awcs) and Appendix D - Component List for Anchorage Configuration Check
	ML13135A241
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	10/31/2012
From:	; ABS Consulting
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Shared Package
ML131350549	List: L-13-118, Resubmittal of FENOC Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.3 of Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima.; ML13135A229; ML13135A230; ML13135A231; ML13135A233; ML13135A234; ML13135A235; ML13135A236; ML13135A237; ML13135A238; ML13135A240; ML13135A241; ML13135A242; ML13135A243; ML13135A244; ML13135A245; ML13135A246; ML13135A247; ML13135A248; ML13135A249; ML13135A251;
References
	L-13-118, TAC MF0092, TAC MF0093, TAC MF0116, TAC MF0159
	Download: ML13135A241 (215)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:APPENDIX C: AREAWALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCS) pOe Paul C. lti:zo Ass'ciates, I'c. Area Room l:\(;ll'lt:IRS ti CONSI 'l:lA\ It Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB 710Floor El.Status:@710 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?No degraded conditions were identified.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2CHS-FCVl I4A N Y N Y N Y N Y X X X X Itaul C. Rizzo Associates.

[nc.Area Room Floorli\tllNFLRl r\ C{lN!1.:t:l,{}* fSWalk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB 710Evaluated by: 7r0_/Brian A. Lucarelli El.Bldg.AXLBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identi/ied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identi/ied regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: Status: N/A t0lr0l2012 l0ll0l20r2 X X X X Status:@Sheet 3 of 2L2 U N Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB 7IO Room Floor El.710 Bldg.N XLB Other supporting or rclcvant docuttrcnts and photos (if any): Filc Nanrc: l-59-6-3-01 .jpcg Dcscription: Arca gcltcral vicw Filc Nanrc: l-(10-6-3-0 L.ipcg Dcscriptiott: Arca gcttcral vicw pOe Paul c' Ilizzu Associates, l'c.f \*CINFhRs.\ (:(lN5l,:l.ll.tN lS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB 710 Boron Tank @Sheet 4 of 2L2 N/A N/A Room Floor El.710 Bldg.AXLBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?No degraded conditions identified in the area 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2SIS-MOV867A X X X X pCe Paul C. ltizz* Associates, l'c.l' \{;lNSl:RS \' e(}N\tll I {}.. fSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.AXLB 710 Boron Tank 710 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? No.flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identdied regarding.fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Sheet 5 of 2L2 NiA t0lr0l20r2 r0n0l20l2 X X X X Evaluated bv: , .1-,-' / .,/ , /i. l,r, /i .i ; I--.1., :i,_--L.\-JBrian A. LucarelliEddie M. Guerra Date: Date: Paul C. Riszo Associatesr Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANIT Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room AXLB 7l0 Boron Tank Status: @Sheet 6 of 2L2 U Floor El.7l0 Bldg.AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I 5-3-01 jpeg

Description:

General view of valves in the area File Name: I 5-3-01 jpeg

Description:

Overall view of boron tank pCa- Ilaul C. llizzt) Associates, l.c.Area Room Ij\{llN[t:R$ At C()N:l:l 1',{}..'lS Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB 7IO HXFloor El.YSheet 7 of ZLZ N/A N/A AXLB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?Most of 20- 1" diam.flange nuts at outlet nozzle.fbr HX2CCP-82 I C were identifiedwith surface coruosion. CR-2012-14459 was issued to address this /inding.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions? Surface rust at base plate of small diameter tubing in the area was identi/ied. Judged not to be a concern.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Wall mounted speaker located over 2SWS-PII02Cl identified to be properlysupported. Judged not a concernJbr potential inleraction.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2CCP-E21A 7r0 Bldg.X X X X pOe lraul C. [{izzo Assr'rciates, l*c.I X(;lNliI.:RS Ai CONSLjII ASIS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room AXLB 710 HXFloor El. 710 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? No.flooding concern identi/ied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e. 9., scaffolding, lead shiel ding) ?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet 8 of 2L2 N/A N/A r0n0l20r2 t0lr0l2012 X X X X Evaluated bv:., -rr,--. - i ,/ ,, l, , l,-: lY.i' ,i I L? --' '* i.Brian A. t-ucarelli -;&Itl";,J'r Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: Paul C. Itizzo Associates, Inc.t. NGINEBRS & CONSLII-T AI\"I$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y@Sheet 9 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.AXLB 7IO HX 7t0 Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-4-3-01 jpeg

Description:

Drums in the area identified to be properly restrainedFile Name: I 4-3-01 jpegDescription: Scaffold identified in the area Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc. IINGINEERS & CONST rL:I:4N fSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y@Bldg.AXLB File Name: l-65-4-3-01 jpegDescription: Pulley in the area noted to be properly restrainedFile Name: l-66-4-3-01 jpeg

Description:

General view of Heat Exchanger Sheet tO of 2L2 U Room Floor El.AXLB 7IO HX 7t0 l-66-4-3-01 jpeg Sheet LL of 2L2 Room Floor El.AXLB 7IO HXPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. C'ONSULTANI'SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Bldg.AXLB

Description:

Mild corrosion identified on nuts of 2CCP-821C outletnozzle 7t0 File Name: l-67 3-01 jpeg [)aul C. Ililzo Associates. lnc.I'I.-clNf FRS !r t:()NstlII:{}"1SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L2 of 2L2 N/A RoomFloor El.AXLB 71 8 718 Bldg.AXLBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Scqf/blding located in the area. Judged not to presenl an inleraction concern.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2CHS-HCVI86 2CHS-LCVL ] 58 2CHS-MOVB132A X X X X Sheet t3 of 2L2ltaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.t:S(;lNlil:RS N (:O:tsl il.1A:{fSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.AXLB 718 718 Bldg.AXLBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No.flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources, 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by: i.+4. .'.1'Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: Status: N/A N/A r0n0l20r2 t0lt0l20l2 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associate$r Inc,ENG TNEERS Sr CONSULI'ANI $ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L4 of z1,z U Room Floor El.AXLB 718 718 Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I 3-3-02.1pegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: I 3-3-02jpegDescription: General view of area ltaul C. Rizzo Associates, Irtc.t N(;lN[].RS Ai C()t{Sl_:[-l"AN TliArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB 718 Status: @N Sheet L5 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.718 Bldg.AXLBFile Name: l 3 02jpeg

Description:

View of scaffold in the area SEIP-"-File Name : l 3-3-02jpeg

== Description:== Tag for seismic requirements for nearby scaffold pce lraul c. ltizzo Ass.ciate+ l'c.I \(;lNIitRS & C()Nst.'1.1Al--l':Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.AXLB 755 Boric Acid TK Room 755 AXLB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?No degraded conditions were identified.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Piping ond conduits in the area werefound to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2CHS-SOV2O6 2CHS-TK2IA Sheet LG of 2t2 Status:@Bldg.X X Y Y N/A Y N/A X x []aul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.t NclNlf,RS {r C()NSI:ll'rlSlsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.AXLB 755 Boric Acid TK Room 755Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse selsmlcinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Brian A. Lucarelli Status:@t0lr0l20l2 Sheet L7 of 2L2 U U N/A U N/A U N/A N Bldg. AXLB N Y N Y N Y U N Y. .lI 1t ./'--l T*q, /.1 Date: Date: t0n0l2012 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.t'n-G INE ERS & L-ONSUUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 18 of 2t2 U Room Floor El.755 AXLB 755 Boric Acid TK Room Bldg.AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Description:

General view of Boric Acid Tank RoomFile Name: I 4-3-04jpeg

== Description:==

View of Boric Acid Tank and attached lines File Name: l-59-4-3-04jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,FNG INEERS & CONSUUTA}NTArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room AXLB 755 Boric Acid TK RoomFloor El.755 Status: @Bldg.AXLBDescription: Piping in the area identified to be rigidly supported. Sheet 19 of 2L2 U File Name: l-65-4-3-04jpeg t N(;lNltRS & (:0r-SL:1:I'.{Nl SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Room Floor El.AXLB 755-MCC Room 755 Bldg.AXLBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Duct andJ'an located in the room identified to be rigidly supported.

Sheet 2O of 2L2 N/A NiA4. Does it appear that the area is free interactions with other equipment lightingf of potentially adverse seismic spatialin the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2HVP-CLC265A MCC-2-EO3 X X X X pCe Iraul c. llizzo Asstrciatcs, l'c. t:li(llNtitlRS Ar {:t}NSI-;IIA}- fSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.AXLB 755-MCC Room 755 Bldg.AXLBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporury installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra 2L of 2L2 N/A N/A t0/10/2012 tDll0l20l2 Sheet X X X X Date: Date: Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.En*G INEE RS & CONSULTAIIT$ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @AXLB 755-MCC RoomBldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I 3-3-04 jpegDescription: Genral view of MCC Room Sheet 22 of 212 U Room Floor El.755File Name: l 3-3-04 jpegDescription: Nearby AC unit identified to be properly supported. pOe Paul C. Itizzo Associates, I'c.Iti(ilNfF_Rs

e. t-()Nst tTA)l-l's Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.AXLB 773 Suree Tank 773 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?

Steel platform identified in the area to be in good condition. Wall mounted pipingsupports ond transmitters identified to be rigidly supported.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2CCP-TK21A N Y N Y N Y N X X X X Paul C. Riezo Associatcs, [nc. Area Room FloortrNClNtrfiRS {i C(}s"$l;t:Il{r-'f S Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB 773 Surge Tank 773 Bldg.AXLBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identdied regardingfire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:Brian A. Lucarelli Eddie M. Guerra El.Date: Date: Sheet 24 of 2L2 N/A N/A 10110/2012 r0lt0l2012 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,r:NGTNEERS & CONSUUTANT$ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 25 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.773 Status: @AXLB 773 Surge Tank Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-2-3-05jpeg

== Description:== View of several small pipes with adequate wall supportsFile Name: l-60-2-3-05 jpeg

Description:

General view of steel box sections used for pipe support and bracing Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Ei.*G INE E RS &. CONSU TTANIT Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 26 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.AXLB 773 Surge Tank 773 Bldg.AXLBFile Name: l-65-2-3-05 jpeg

Description:

General view of Surge Tank PCe llaul C. ltiez' Ass*ciates, [nc.I N(;lN[f R5 Lt CONSI.:l:1",{N15 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB-CP-735 @Sheet 27 of 2L2 N/A NiA N/A Room Floor El, Bldg.735 AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items' The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?No degraded conditions were identified.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping in the area was.found to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free interactions with other equipment lighting)?

of potentially adverse seismic spatialin the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andRelated equipment on SWEL for this area: 2CHS-P2]A X X X X Faul C. Itizzo Associatcs. Inc.I S(;lti[liRs G Lt()Ntt'I:lA:.-'f SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca? No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding/ire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Room Floor El.Evaluated by: AXLB-CP-735 735 Bldg.*;--' -- / / ., '., L' '-t l.at'- ,,{ !" ,rt' i ...*- "* . \!Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. Guerra Date: Date:28 of 2L2 N/A t0tr0l2012 t0lr0l20l2 Y X Y X Y X Y x Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCTNEERS & CONSI*II;TA]VIT Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB-CP-735 Status:@Sheet 29 of 2L2 U N Room Floor El.735 Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-4-3-03 jpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: l-60-4-3-03 jpegDescription: View of ceiling and lighting fixtures PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, I'c.f: :.-(; lh\[ t_ RS & CO NS I ; l]',\:i'IS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Batterv Room 2-lFloor El. 730 Bldg. SRVBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Sheet 3O of 2L2 Status: @ N Ul. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? Small AC unit identified to be tightly strapped to wall and judged not a potential.for interaction.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Lighting.fixtures in the room judged ok.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: BAT-2-I YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X 3t of 2L2Iraul C. Rizzlr Associatcs, lnc. Area Room Floorts{ilNttRs & rti)Nst:t:t:{: ts Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Battery Room 2-l Bldg.SRVBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a ftre in the area?No c oncerns identdied re garding -fire s our c es.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 730 El.Evaluated by: ,-i-:..: ,/- r/ )" r _ .'.,;t'rt4jr{-" ," i Brian A. Lucarelli" l't ./-.f -\: ,-fu*-+J t Eddie M. Guerra X X N/A N/A t0ll0l20r2 r0lr0l2012 X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,ENC INEERS &. CONSUUTANT$ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 32 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.730Battery Room 2-1 Bldg.SRVBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-l-3-30jpgDescription: General view of area lraul C, Ilizzo Associates, lnc.IIljcINEtRS {i t\lNSt jtll:.1}i'l'S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.CNTB 707 707 CNTBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Several cabinets opened and found in acceptable condition. Floor tiles were lifted and no missing anchors were identi.fied.for cabinet's base configuration.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays identified to be rigidly supported.

@Sheet 33 of 2L2 N/A NiA N/A N/A Bldg.4. Does it appear that the area is freeinteractions with other equipment lighting)? of potentially adverse seismic spatialin the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andRelated equipment on SWEL for this area:

PNL-2RPU-A

RK-2AUX-REL-C

RK-2PRI-PROC-]

RK-2PRI-PROC-2

RK-2SEC-PROC-A X X X X SheetIraul C. Rizzo Asstrciates. lnc. t NCINITURS (A (:ONstil1.1\lsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)CNTB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identi/ied regardingfire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Room Floor El.Evaluated by:CNTB 707 707 Bldg./i,)+r.'.- / /.. I',. _ -='r_/f,I,""i (Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. Guerra Status: N/A N/A tOlr0l20r2 r0tI0l20r2 X X X X Itaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,F NC TNEERS &" C0NSL;lT.*ri-'l :iArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @N Sheet 35 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.CNTB 707 707 Bldg.CNTB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I 5-3-06 jpegDescription: View of cabinet arrangement in the area and lighting fixtures File Name: l-60-5-3-06jpegDescription: Tag ID for cabinet opened for inside inspection I 5-3-06 jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG TNEERS &. LX)NSTiUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 36 of 2L2 U N RoomFloor El.CNTB 707 707 Bldg.CNTBFile Name: l-65-5-3-06jpegDescription: General view of opened cabinet I 5-3-06 jpeg pce lraul c. ltizzo Associatss' I*c.t' S{llNhERS \\ (loNtt:t1.,\}- I SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)CNTB 707 SW Corner @Sheet 37 of 2L2 N/A N/A N/A Room Floor El.707 Bldg.CNTB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and f,rndings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Wall and.floor mounted panels in the area were identi/ied to be in good condition.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays and conduits in the areo were

/bund to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area: PNL-VITBS2-]A X X X X pce lraul c. ltizz' Associatcs, l'c.t ti{;lN[tRs {t coNst't:ri}iltArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)CNTB 707 SW Corner Room Floor El.707 Bldg.CNTB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? No flooding concern identiJied in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No c onc erns ident ifi ed regarding .fir e s ourc es.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Cart near cabinets was identified to be securelv restrained.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. Guerra M"-fr Date: Date: Sheet 38 of 2L2 Status: N/A N/A N/A t0lr0l2012

r0lr0l20r2 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN'G INEE RS &. CI)NSUIjTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 39 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.707 Status: o CNTB 707 SW Corner Bldg.CNTBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Description: South-west area with wall mounted panelsFile Name: l-60-4-3-06jpegDescription: View of maintenance equipment properly tight to center columnFile Name: l-59-4-3-06jpeg Paul C. Rizao Associatesr Inc,ENG INEERS & CONSUUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room CNTB 707 SW Corner Status: @Bldg.CNTB File Name: l-65-4-3-06jpegDescription: View of cart with locked wheels located near cabinets Sheet 4O of 212 U Floor El.707 Paul C. Ilizzo Associates, lnc.t r.-{.;tNFf:RS ti (l()NSt:lT.{\ IS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.CNTB 735-AC Room 735 Bldg.CNTBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Wall mounted instruments were identified to be in good condition and adequately anchored.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? All piping and conduits are well supported in this area.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2HVC-ACU2O ] A @Sheet 4L of 2L2 N/A N/A N/A Y X X X X pc'\e Ilaul c. Ilizz. Ass.ciates, l'c.I lictNF [Rs s (:{)Nlt.:tll'.{N[s Walk-By Checklist (AWC)CNTB 735-AC Room Area Room Floor 73s Bldg.CNTB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? No flooding concern identi/ied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a frre in the arca?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra El.Date: Date: Sheet 42of2L2 N/A N/A N/A t0lt0l2012 r0lr0l20r2 X X X X Paul C. Rizro Associatesr Lnc.f,T$G INEER$ &. CONSULTANT$ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@File Name: l-60-2-3-07 jpegDescription: General view of component 2HVC-ACU201A N Sheet 43 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.73sCNTB 735-AC Room Bldg.CNTBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l 2-3-07 jpeg

Description:

View of attached lines on HVAC unit r-59-2-3-07 jpeg Itaul C. Rizzo Associatesr Inc. INGINEE RS 6[ CONSL; I.:tAi{I SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @N Bldg.CNTB File Name: l 2-3-07 jpeg

Description:

View of small diameter piping rigidly supported from wall Sheet 44 of 2LZ U RoomFloor El.CNTB 735-AC Room 735 r-65-2-3-07 jpee PCe Faul c. ltizzo Associates, l'c.t r-illNfliltS r\ C()NS[:[1-.{\'IS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Room Floor El.Control BLDG MCC 707 Bldg.CNTBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)? Control panel identified with protective glass to cover.from potential .falling objects.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays and conduits in the area were./bund lo be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Lightingfixtures above control panel were identi/ied to be properly restrained.Judged not to present a potential interaction concern.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: MCC-2-E09 XSheet 45 of 2L2 N/A N/A X X X PCe lraul C. llirz. Asstrciates, ['c.f 5( ;INFERS .\ t\,rNlt'tI -{\1t Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Control BLDG MCCFloor El.707 Bldg.CNTB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? No flooding concern identi/ied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Sheet 46 of 212 Evaluated bv:.,.-o1?*: .- / ,/ ,: i- ---., r--i -t"l\_ ."'. 1.,,t./-. I,_.,..{Brian A. Lucarelli Status: t0tr0l2012 _F6.Date: Date:Eddie M. Guerra t0n0l2012 Y X Y X Y X Y X'tt ) ,;,, t ,-4-4 -::-1-,t h,"-<J .t Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.F,N'GINEERS &. CONSUTTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)\Status:@Sheet 47 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.707 Control BLDG MCC Bldg.CNTBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: 1-59-3-3-06jpeg

== Description:==

General view of area File Name: I 3-3-06jpeg

== Description:== View of control panel Itaul C. Rizzo Associatesr Lnc.t' N(;INEERS {i COn*Sl-

l-TA}lf .tArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet 48 of 2L2 U N RoomFloor El.Control BLDG MCC 707 Bldg.CNTBFile Name:

I 3-3-06 jpeg

Description:

View of cabinet arrangement in the area pC? Paul Cl. Ilirz' As;ociates' Inc.tlN(;lNEtiRS {s C{lNSl ltf4N fSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Control Room 735 Bldg.CNTBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Control room ceiling main runners are supported Jrom concrele ceiling by wires at-4'spacing. Each ceiling tile (i.e., egg grating) is tied to the main runners at each o.f its Jbur corners and judged not to be a potential.falling hazard. Potential ceilinginteraction with back panels judged not a concern as there are no sensitive relays in these panels and the interaction is judged to be unlikely.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2HVR-TI228 2HVR-T[228-12RSS-TI] 5OA PNL-2BLG-^gER

PNL-VITBS2-2C RK-2UNC-INS X@Sheet 49of2L2 N/A N/A Y Y Y Y X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I]i{ctNFttRs s ai)Nstil

I.{N rsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Control Room 735 Bldg.CNTB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the arca?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporcry installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Step ladder adjacent to radiation monitor instrumentation panel. Judged not aconcern as the panel is marked non-seismically related.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?One of the doors./br panel PNL-2FAL-REC can not positively be latched. Judged not a concern as there are no relays in this 3-panel line up.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv:Brian A. Lucarelli Date:Eddie M. Guerra Date:Sheet 5O of 2L2 Status: r0n0l20r2 t0ll0l20r2 X X X X Paul C. Rizeo Associatesr l,nc.E}$GINEERS & CONSuuTAIil$ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @N Sheet 5L of 2L2 U Room Floor El.Control Room 73s Bldg.CNTBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: Control_Rm( I )jpgDescription: View of panel PNL-2FAL-REC was not positively latched. Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.F;T\'G IN EF.RS & CONSI IITANI'SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Control Room Status:@Sheet 52 of 2t2 U Room Floor El.735 Bldg.CNTBFile Name: Control_Rm(3fpgDescription: Step ladder located next to cabinetFile Name: Control_Rm(4fpgDescription: View of cabinet in the area Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS (t T]ONSU UTAXTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @N Bldg.CNTBFile Name: Control_Rm(sfpgDescription: View of control room ceiling and the back panelsFile Name: Control_Rm(6Xpg

== Description:==

General view of ceiling grates.Sheet 53 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.Control Room 735 pce Iraul C. llizz' Associates, I'c.Is(llNf ERS & rlt)Ntl.llafirN"!.SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.CV&RC Area-Reac-2T-SWGR 755 Bldg.MSCVInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?HVAC ducts and cable trays in the area were.fbund to be rigidly supported.

Y Sheet 54 of 2L2 NiA N/A Y Y Y4. Does it appear that the area is free interactions with other equipment lighting)? of potentially adverse seismic spatialin the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 52_IBYA 52 RTA X X X X pce- Paul C. Iliseo Assnciates, l'c.t \{llNFLRS r\ CONst-: uI.tN'rSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.CV&RC Area-Reac-2T-SWGR 755 Bldg.MSCVInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding Jire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Sheet 55 of 2L2 X X X N/A r0lt0l20r2 r0n0l20l2 XEvaluated bv: ,-.'j.' ' / ..t",'tl -...r?' ,'?-'t' i I .',,.L \Brian A. Luclreli Guerra Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG INEERS 6r LX)NSLI LTAh-TSArea Walk-By Checklist (A\ryC)Sheet 55 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.755 Status: @CV&RC Area-Reac-2T-SWGR Bldg.MSCV Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-2 I 5 jpeg

Description:

General view of cabinets in the area and lighting fixtures File Name: l-60-2-3-15 jpegDescription: View of conduits and cable trays in the area. pce lraul c. Itizzo Asrtrciates, l'c.l: \-$ lN f f R5 & (:( )NSt ; lif-.ts"lsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Room Floor El.EDG 2-I 732 Bldg.DGBX Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?(moderate rust at yoke to bonnet of valve 2SWS-MOVI 13A. Re./br to Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Sheet 336 o.f 513 .for this component SWC and thecorresponding CR).

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping and ducts in the area are rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2EGF-LIS2O3A 2EGF-P21A 2EGF-TK22A 2EGS-EG2-]

2STI/S-MOVI l3A MCC-2-EO7 PNL-2DIGEN-] XSheet 57 of 2L2 N/A X X X Paul C. Rizzo As:ociates. [nc.[ :\'{',lNf IRS & ()(lN\l : t]t n]..'f SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.EDG 2-1'732 DGBXInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?No.flooding concern identiJied in this ares.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Bldg.Evaluated by: ,,'i=: .: ,/1/,, ,/-( - .r'-'r/ r,,.*-- i (Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. Guerra Date: Date: Y X Y X Y X Y X r0n0t2012 t0lt0l20r2 Paul C. Rizzo Associatesr Inc.ENGTNEERS 6{ C$TNSLiLTANI S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Bldg.DGBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Description: General view of area showing pipe bracing members Sheet 59 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.EDG 2-I 732File Name: EDG2-l(lXpgFile Name: EDG2-l(2XpgDescription: General view of cabinets in the area and lighting fixtures Paul C. Rizzo Ausociates, Inc,ENGTNEERS & (.-ONSTIUI ANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 5O of 2L2 U Room Floor El.EDG 2-I 732Bldg.DGBXFile Name: EDG2-I(3XpgDescription: View of fire extinguisher in the areaFile Name: EDG2-l(4XpgDescription: View of nearby restrained cabinet RArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @NBldg.DGBX File Name: EDG2-l (5) jpg

Description:

Properly restrained ladder identified in the areaFile Name: EDG2- I (6)jpe

Description:

View of scaffold located next to Diesel Generator Sheet 6L of 2L2 U Room Floor El.EDG 2-I 732 R Paul c. Rizzo Ass*ciates, l'c.INGINF ERS t\, C()NSI

tl A]i t 5 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)EDG 2-I Status:@Sheet 62 of 2t2 U N RoomFloor El.732 Bldg.DGBX File Name: EDG2- I (7) jpgDescription: View of restrained ladder in the area File Name: EDG2- I (8) jpgDescription: View of restrained ladder in the areaEDG2- I (7) jpe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc'ENGTNEERS &.

CONSULTANT$ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)EDG 2-1 Status: @Bldg.DGBXFile Name: EDG2-l(9Xpg

== Description:== View of lighting fixture with missing fluorescent tube.Sheet 63 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.732 EDG2-l(e[pe Ilaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I,]((]INI IRS {i (.-ON*S[.:I:lA}-. fiArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.EDG 2-l Upstairs 759 Bldg.DGBX Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?DG mffier wqs identified to be rigidly supported. Emergency DG ground resistoridentified to be mounted on 4 porcelain supports. Since this equipment is only used for periodic testing and is not CAT l, it is judged to be adequate and not to present aseismic concern.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g,, ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2HVD-DMP20lA 2HVD-DMP22A 2HVD-FN27OA YSheet 64 of 2t2 N/A N/A N/A Y X X X X Sheet 65 of 2L2 ['aul C. ltizzo Associates, Inc.t'NtltN tl ERS {i CLrr*51

t:I A-\1-SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.EDG 2-l Upstairs 7s9 Bldg.DGBX Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regardingfire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by: , -] - /./ i'I I _ -...rrr"-.fi,/^-- i_ (-{Brian A. Lucarelli -=__=,,:v/ {L,l'*_/,---- *ffi6/,, ./r, h.haj: . aEddie M. Guerra Date: X X X N/A r0lr0l20r2 t0lr0l2012 X Itatrl C, ll'i;;o r\ssrrci.rtcs, Ittr.l\{'lNlll{1 ,\ ( (t\\l ll\\l\Status: @Sheet 66 of 2L2 U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)N Room Floor El.759 EDG 2-l Upstairs Bldg.DGBXOther supporting or rclcvant documcnts and photos (if any):Filc Nanre: EDG2-l_Up( I ).jpg

Description:

Vicw of clcctrical equipment properly braced in the areaFilc Nanrc: EDG2- IDescription: Gcncral _ up(z).jpe vicw of DG exhaust muffler PCe l'aul C. lliri* Ass'ti.tcs, l.r:. I \(,lNII ll'!,\ ( (\N\t ll'\}-'l\Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Roorn Floor El.Status:@Sheet 67 of 2L2 U N EDG 2-l Upstairs 7s9 Bldg.DGBXFile Name:

== Description:== EDG2- l_up(3).jpe General vicw of areaFilc Name:

== Description:==

EDG2- l_Up(a) jpe General vicw of area Paul C. Rizzo Associatesr Inc.T. NGINETRS 6i C0N$LIL:TA,NT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)EDG 2-I Upstairs Status' @N Sheet 68 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.7s9Bldg.DGBXFile Name: EDG2- I _Up(5[pg

Description:

Properly restrained ladder identified in the area File Name: EDG2-l_Up(6Xpg

== Description:== View of DG ground resistor EDG2-l_Up(s[pe Paul C. Rigzo Associates. Inc.ENGINEERS {K CONSL:ITANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Sheet 69 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.EDG 2-l Upstairs 7s9Bldg.DGBXFile Name: EDG2- l_Up(7).Spe

== Description:== DG resistor tag ID Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.I.I:..CINEIRS & CONST

tll tN't S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Y Sheet 7O of 2L2 N/A N/A N/A Room Floor El.Emerg SWGR AE SRVB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Conduits, ducts and cable trays are identi/ied to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Fluorescent light Jixtures are hung from chains to ceiling and their swing in a seismicevent could potentially hit top o/'the I7 panel line-up. CR-201 2-14463 was issued to address this situation.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 4BOVUS-2-8 4KVS-2AE BAT-CHG2-1 BAT-CHG2-3 DC-SWBD2-]

PNL DC2-07 PNL DC2-19 PNL-SEQ-244 TRF-2-8N UPS-VITB52-1 UPS-VITB52- ] -REG 730 Bldg.Y Y Y Y X X X X pOa Paul C. ltiezo Associates, ['c.Fri(;lNF tr RS & LlOr-St

l:f AliIS Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Emerg SWGR AE Area Room Floor Status: El.730 Bldg.SRVBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse interactions that could cause a fire in the arca?No concerns identi/ied regarding Jire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporury installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the arca?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) selsmlc Evaluated by: ,F - .//,)r :lfi,i r+./_"r, (-{Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. Guerra Date: Date: X X N/A N/A 101r012012 t0lt0l2012 X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc, ENC INEERS dc. C0NSLiLTTINTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)@Sheet 72 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.730 Status: Emerg SWGR AE Bldg.SRVBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: SWGR AE(lXpg

Description:

General view of areaFile Name: SWGR AE(2)jpgDescription: General view of lighting fixtures and top cabinet conduits SWGR AE(2)jpg PCe l'a rrt c. ltizie, Assot-ir,.,::--b-...:I \t;lNI'lrlls S. ( ()Nsl ll.\\lS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Status: Y Sheet 73 of 2L2 U@Emerg SWGR AE 730Bldg.SRVB File Name: SWGR AE(3).jpg

Description:

Fire extinguisher located in the areaFilc Namc: SWGR AE(4).jpg

Description:

Storagc box located in the area.SWGR AE(3).jpe Itaul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.I' N(';INEIRS Ai CONSI-ILTAN"I S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Emerg SWGR AE Status: Y@Sheet 74 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVBFile Name: SWGR AE(s)jpg

Description:

Properly restrained ladder identified in the areaFile Name: SWGR AE(6)jpg

Description:

View of ceiling conduits and lighting fixtures Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc, ENTi INEERS & CONSUUTANT$ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Emerg SWGR AE Status: Bldg.SRVBFile Name: SWGR AE(7)jpg

Description:

Hanging light located close to cabinet.Interaction addressed in CR-20 12-14463@Sheet 75 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.730 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I\I;INEERS {r tl(}Nstilll Sl-!Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)@Sheet 76 ot 2L2 N/A N/A N/A N/A Room Floor El.Emerg SWGR DF 730 SRVB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays and ducts in the area were identiJied to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 4BOVUS-2-9 4KVS-2DF Bldg.X X X X Sheet 77 of 2L2 Paul C. Rizzo Asstrciates. Inc.rN{;lNFlF.Rs $ l.oNslj I I'..riqrtArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Emerg SWGR DF Bldg.SRVB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffoldrng, lead shielding)?I.5" diameter loops oJ'cable is mounted on the side of'BAT-CHG2-9 and may interact with panel. This is judged not a concern since the charger is for maintenance purposes only.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Brian A. Lucarelli Date:Eddie M. Guerra Date: 730 r0n0Darz t0n0l20l2 Y X N/A N/A Y X Y X Y X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.T NGINEERS {\ CONSUITA}i-TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 78 of 2t2 U Room Floor El.730 Status' @NEmerg SWGR DF Bldg.SRVB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: SWGR_DF(I )jpg

Description:

General view of electrical equipment in the areaFile Name: SWGR_DF(2Xpg

== Description:==

General view of cabinets and lighting fixtures ltaul C. Rizzo Associatesr lnc.t.li( llNt ERS A( 1'11l\;\t:l:l ..\N I5 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Emerg SWGR DF Status: @N Sheet 79 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB File Name: SWGR_DF(3)jpg

== Description:== View of cable trays above electrical cabinetsFile Name: SWGR_DF(4)jpg

== Description:==

Storage carts and ladders located identified to be properly secured.in the area Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG INEERS & CONSU I.TANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 8O of 2L2 U Room Floor El.Emerg SWGR DF 730 Bldg.SRVBFile Name: SWGR_DF(5Xpg

== Description:==

Fire hose located in the areaFile Name: SWGR_DF(6)jpg

== Description:== Fire extinguisher located in the atea Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EI\$INEERS &. CON$t-r' LTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Emerg SWGR DF Status:@Sheet 8L of 2L2 U N Room Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVBFile Name: SWGR_DF(7).ipe

== Description:==

View of I .5" diameter loops of cable mounted on the side of BAT -CHG2-9 Faul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.FS{ lll,iFERS A; {:C}NSI'ITA\-I-S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Room Floor El.FULB 729 PMP Room 729 Bldg.FULB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2FNC-108 2FNC-EJM23OA 2FNC-P2]A Y Sheet 82 of 2L2 N/A N/A N/A Y X X X X pOe Paul C. Itizao Ass'ciates, I'c. t:rctNEF_RS {i C()NSt jIT.{\1S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.FULB 729 PMP Room 729 Bldg.FULB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca? No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet 83 of 2L2 X X N/A tDlt0l20l2 t011012012 X X Evaluated by: ,.2'1-: -- ,/ ./ ,-t't 't'-:.-T, ,*'i'- .ri i\ - --i.'t.,-;,1-.-. {Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. Guerra Date: Date: Paul C. Rizzo Associatesp Inc, ENGINEERS & CONSLfuTA}ETS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 84 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.729 Status: @N FULB 729 PMP Room Bldg.FULBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I 3-3-29.1peg

== Description:== Overall view of pumps in the area File Name: I 3-3-29.1pe9

== Description:==

Ladder in the area identified to be properly restrained. Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUITA}ITS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Bldg.FULBFile Name: I 3-3-29.1peg

== Description:== View of pipe lines attached to pumps in the areaSheet 85 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.FULB 729 PMP Room 729 ltaul C. llizzo A:sociates, Inc.Fr*(;lNE [.RS {i C(}NS l-: I 1 A}'-'! 5Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 86 of 212 N/A N/A N/A N/A RoomFloor El.FULB 741HX Room Bldg.FULB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in degraded conditions?the area appear to be free of significant

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays and piping in the area.found to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2FNC-82]A 2FNC-RVIOl 2FNC-TIIO]A

2FNC-TIIO2A 741 X X X X Sheet 87 of 2L2 ltaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. [\(;lN[ERS & c()Nsl'tT,{\ts Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Interaction Effects FULB 741HX Room FULB5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by: 741 Bldg.*_::zJ ,,U -=f o-_--* --vffi/,,. /* /d*q,J (Eddie M. Guerra Status: r0lr0l20l2 r0tr0l20r2 X X X X Itaul C. Rigzo Associates, Inc.I,NCINEERS & (UNST;LII A\N 5 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 88 of 2L2 U N RoomFloor El.741 FULB 741 HX Room Bldg.FULB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name : l 2-3-29.1pe9

== Description:==

General view of Heat Exchangers File Name : l 2-3-29.jpeg

== Description:==

View of cable trays in the areal 2-3-29.jpes Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGIN EERS & (X)NSUUTfu\TTl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Bldg.FULB File Name: l-65-2-3-29.jpegDescription: View of Heat Exchanger mounted on saddle supportsFile Name: l 2-3-29.jpeg

== Description:== Nearby floor mounted pipe supports.Sheet 89 of 2t2 U RoomFloor El.741 FULB 741 HX Room pCe Paul c. Rizz' Associates, ['c.I NCtNIitrRS e c0Nst'tTa\'] s Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) RoomFloor El.IAC Room 773 Bldg.MSCVInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?Wall mounted panels and instrument panels in the area were identified to be in goodcondition. Unit heater and instrument air tank were identdied to be good condition.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? Piping in the area was identified to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2CCP-MOV] ]9 X Status:@Sheet 9O of 212 N/A N/A Y Y Y Y X X X PC\e l3 Hl n"u:u t*;,',;*t*.'." t "Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Sheet 9L of 2L2 Room Floor El.IAC Room 773 Bldg.MSCV Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?No Jlooding concern identiJied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fre in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by:Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. Guerra X Status: N/A N/A t0/10/2012 t0lt0l20r2 X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,F,NG IN E ERS & C{)NSLI LTAIIITSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet 92 of 2t2 U RoomFloor El.IAC Room 773 Bldg.MSCVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I 5 l6 jpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: I 5-3-l6jpegDescription: Fire extinguisher and floor mounted supports for room pipe lines. Paul C. Ilizzo Associates. Inc.tr}i( ;INEERS {i C(lNSt.rl T..{SI5 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 93 of 2L2 N/A Room Floor El.Intake Cubicle C 70s Bldg.TNTSInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

Sur/'ace rust noticed on most oJ'12-7/8" diameter machine bolts attaching pump 2SWS-P21B to base plate. Judged not to present a signi/icant structural concern.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2HVW-FN257A 2SWS-EJM221A

2SWS-PCVl ]8 X X X X [raul C. ltizzo Associates. lnc.f \t;llirt_Rs & c(,rl,]tl

t'I '{st r Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)INTS5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

RoomFloor El.Interaction Effects Evaluated by: Intake Cubicle C 705 Bldg.{*:*}.,,,,,{# Brian A. Lucarelli Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date:Sheet 94 of 212 Status: N/A N/A N/A tOt1012012 t0il0t20r2 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc, E\rc T NEERS &. CONSLI IJTAI*T$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 95 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.705 Intake Cubicle C Bldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: INTK_CUB_C( I Xpg

Description:

General view of area File Name: INTK_CUB_C(2).Sp9

== Description:==

Scaffold identified in the area R Paul c. Riezo Associates' [*c. FNGINE ERS rt CONSL:LTA}i]'S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Status: @N Sheet 95 of 2L2 U Intake Cubicle C 70s Bldg.INTS File Name: INTK_CUB_C(3)jpg

== Description:==

General view of area File Name : INTK_CUB_C(4Xpg

== Description:== Surface rust identified on small pipe support. Paul C. Riz,zo Associates; Inc.ENG INEERS & COhXSUUTA}ITS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Intake Cubicle C Status: @Bldg.INTS File Name: INTK_CUB_C(5Xpg

== Description:== Surface rust identified on bolts for Pump 2SWS-P2lB.Sheet 97 of 2L2 UFloor El.705 File Name: INTK CUB _C(6)jpg

Description:

Surface rust identified on bolts for Pump 2SWS-P218. Itaul C. Rizzer Associates, lnc. t:{(]lNEtrRS r\. CO:lSt."tT.{}i l S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)o Sheet 98 of 2L2 N/A N/A N/A Room Floor El.Intake Cubicle D 705 Bldg.INTSInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Fuel oil tank identified to be adequately anchored. Unit heaters were identified to berigidly supported. Fire pump in the area identi/ied to be adequately anchored.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2HVW-MOD2 ]A 2SWS-57 2SWS-P71A2SWS-PT-] I7A MCC-2-EO]Y Y Y Y X X X X pCe Paul c. Itizzo Associates, l'c.Ii\clNFf R$ r\ (-0tsl:t:l.{}]'lsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Sheet 99 of 2L2 Intake Cubicle D 705 Bldg.INTS Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identiJied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Fuel oil in the area is considered the ignition source. Fuel oil tank identi/ied to beadequately anchored7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Temporary scaffold in the area was identi/ied to be well braced and judged not to present an interaction concern with nearby components.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: X NiA N/A N/A r0n0l20r2 t0lr0l20l2 X X X R Itaul C. Riu.zo Associates, Inc.IN(;IN TiERS {L CONSI" ; I I,{:\T5 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet t0O of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.705 Status: @N Intake Cubicle D Bldg.INTSOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: INTK_CUB_D( I Xpg

Description:

View of expansion joint located on pipe attached toFile Name: INTK_CUB_D(2) jpg

Description:

General view of instruments in the areavertical Pump 2SWS-P2 1A. Itaul C. Ris,zo Associatesr Inc.ti:\(;I N E ERS {I. CONST

lTA}i"Is Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @N Bldg.TNTS File Name: INTK_CUB_D(3Xpg

== Description:==

View of PVC pipe connected to vertical pump 2SWS-P2IB. Sheet LOL of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.Intake Cubicle D 705 Paul C. Rizztr Associatcs, lnc.f.r\(;tNrtR5 & coNrtrll.uiTi Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Main Steam Room El778 778 Bldg.MSCVInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Pipes, ducts and conduits in the oreo were identified to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2FWS-HYV] 574 2SVS-HCV]04 @Sheet LOZ of 212 N/A N/A N/A Y Y Y Y X X X x pC? I.,.g!-C, Itizz. Associates, l'c.l, N-(; lN E g R S {i CflNSl.

llt.{\"IS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Main Steam Room F'1778 778 Bldg.MSCVInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the arca?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv: ,i?" - / /'/'( - -:1., f "*', ', Brian A. Lucarelli Date: Status:@tOlr0l20l2 Sheet 103 of 212 N/A N/A N/AEddie M. Guerra t0lt0l2012 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associatesr fnc"EIV; INEERS &. COFTSULTfu\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: o Sheet LO4 of 2L2 U 778 Main Steam Room El778 Bldg.MSCV Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I 6 l6 jpeg

Description:

General view of area PCe Paul C. ltizro Associatss' I'c. frli(llNEtrRS {i C()NSt:tTA\"l SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Main Steam Room EI789 Status:@Sheet L05 of 2L2 N/A NiA RoomFloor El.789 Bldg.MSCVInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping and ducts in the area were identified to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2MSS-AOVl OlA 2MSS-SOVlO5A Y Y Y Y X X X X PCe Paul c. Itizzo Associates, I'c.f.St;lNF:ERS & C()NSI :II'ANIS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Main Steam Room El789 789 Bldg.MSCV Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No Jlooding concern identified in this areo.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the arca'l No concerns identi/i ed re garding .fire s ourc es.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) X Sheet LO6 of 2L2 N/A N/A X X XEvaluated bv: {r;:;*,{#Brian A. Lucarelli Date: t0lr0l20l2Eddie M. Guerra Date: t0n0t20t2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGTNEERS & CONSUUTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Sheet L07 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.789 Main Steam Room El 789Bldg.MSCVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-7 I 6jpeg

Description:

General view of area PCe Paul c. Rizzs Associates, l*c.f N(;INFF-RS & C()NSU[:I."li-.tSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.Main Steam Room Upper Plat.773 Bldg.MSCV Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions? No degraded conditions were identified,3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? Pipes, ducts and conduits in the area were identi/ied to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2MSS-SVlO]A 2SVS-PCV]O]A XSheet 108 of 212 N/A N/A N/A N/A X X X pceArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Main Steam Room Upper Plat.Sheet LO9 of 2L2Floor El.773 Bldg.MSCV Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No conc erns identi/i ed re garding .fir e s ourc es.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporury installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv:Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: N/A N/A N/A r0n0l20r2 r0n0t20r2 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG IN EERS & CONSTJUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet tLO of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.773 Main Steam Room Upper Plat.Bldg.MSCVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-8-3-l6jpegDescription: General view of area File Name: l-60-8-3-l6jpeg

== Description:==

General view of area Paul C. Ilizzo Associates. Inc.t r*(;lhtF F.RS ti C{l NS l--: tT,{N"l S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet LtIof2l2 N/A N/A Room Floor El.MSCV 718 718 Bldg.MSCV Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions? Several valves were identified with moderate surface corrosion: 2SWS-MOVI60,2SWS-MOV I 6 2 and 2 SWS- MOV I 5 2 - I . CR-20 I 2- I 4449, CR-20 I 2 - I 44 5 0 and CR-2012-14452 were issued to address these conditions. Valve 2SWS-MOVI61 is rathera heavy MOV that is attqched to bonnet with 4-3/8" diam bolts. These bolts are moderately conoded. CR-2012-14455 issued to address tftis condition. Surface rust on valve 2BOC-AOV-I00Al judged not to be a concern.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2CCP-MOV150-1 2CVS-SOVIO2 2CVS-SOVI5lA 2RCS-AOV I O l X X X X Paul C. Itizzo Associates, lnc.t \( ;lNFt_RS & rlClNSt:t:fASISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet t12 of 212 N/A N/A N/A Room Floor El.Evaluated by:MSCV 718 718Bldg.MSCV Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) t:E-{,,,,{{{ Brian A. Lucarelli t0n0l20l2;-.-ifulhI"{{rEddie M. Guerra Date: Date: t0lt0l20l2 X X X X R l-aul c. Itizz' Associates, I'c"t N(;lNFlrRS & f()NSl :l:t Alil SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Sheet LL3 of 2L2 Status: Y@View of storage cart and waste drums in the area.These were identified to be properly secured.U MSCV 7I8 718Bldg.MSCVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-2 I 2.jpee

Description:

General view of areaFile Name:

== Description:==

t-60-2-3-t2jpeg Sheet tL4 of 2L2[taul C. Rirzo Associates, lnc.I lit;lNf Ilts &, ("ONSi l1AN"I5 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y U@RoomFloor El.MSCV 7I8 718 Bldg.MSCV File Name: l-65-2 l 2.jpegDescription: View of restrained storage cartFile Name: l-66-2 l 2.jpeeDescription: View of restrained container Paul C. Rizzo Amociates, Inc. F"I$GINEERS &. CENSU UTA TTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:Bldg.MSCV File Name: l-67 3-l2Speg

== Description:== View of large diameter pipes File Name: l-68-2-3-l2jpeg

== Description:==

Surface rust identified for valve 2SWS-MOVI62. CR-2012-14450 issued for this finding.@Sheet tLS of 2L2 U Room Floor El.MSCV 7I8 718 Paul C. Riezo Associates, lnc.F,!\STNEE.RS & CONSU UTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Bldg.MSCVFile Name: l-69-2-3-l2.1peg

== Description:== Deficiency tag identified for 2SWS-MOVl60. CR-2012-14449 issued for this situation.File Name: l-70-2-3-l2Speg

== Description:==

Deficiency tag identified for 2SWS-MOVI52-1. CR-2012-14452 issued for this situation. @Sheet tl6 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.MSCV 7I8 718 Itaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,I,NGINEE RS & CONSl-

LT,{\T$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y Bldg.MSCVFile Name: l-7 l-z-3-l2SpegDescription: Corrosion identified on base of 2BDG-AOV100B1.

Sheet LL7 of 2L2@u Room Floor El.MSCV 7I8 718 l-72-2-3-tzjpegFile Name:

== Description:==

Corrosion identified on base of 2SWS-MOVl61. Bolts appearedto be undersi zed. CR-20 12-14455 was issued to address this situation. Paul C. RiEzo Associates, Inc.El{cIN F. ERS O q155t :tIA}rr$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y@Bldg.MSCVFile Name: l-7 4-2-3-l2jpeg

== Description:==

2BDG-AOV-100A identified with mild surface corrosion.File Name: l-7 5-2 I 2.jpeeDescription: Scaffold located in the area Sheet tL8 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.MSCV 718 718 Judsed not a seismic concern. Pau[ C. Rizzo Aorociates, Inc, ENGINEERS & C0t ISUUrANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room MSCV 718 Status: Bldg.MSCV File Name: l-7 6-2-3-l2.1pegDescription: Tag and signature for scaffold meeting seismic requirements. Sheet L19 of 2L2 UFloor El.718 pceArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.MSCV East 735 735 MSCV Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays identified to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Fire hose station presents potential interaction with Panel 2PU-47. The panel is not aCAT I panel and the potential interaction was judged acceptable.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2RCS-PT44O Bldg.Y Sheet LZO of 2L2 N/A N/A N/A Y Y Y X X X X pCe Paut Lr. Ilizzo Assrrciatcs, [nc. Area Room FloorIi5(;INFERS r\ Co*-tt :t:t.drvrs Walk-By Checklist (AWC)MSCV East 735 735 Bldg.MSCV Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet !2L of 2L2 N/A N/A N/A Evaluated bv: ,-+'" / ../ '/i _ --r:,--l,rr,f .? --l (Brian A. Lucarelli t0lr0l20l2 Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: t0tr0l20l2 El.X X X X ltaul C. Riz,zo Associatesr Inc.F. NC IN E E R S {! C0 n-SL; LTA:r*TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L22 of 2L2 U N Room Floor El.73s MSCV East 735 Bldg.MSCV Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-2 I 4jpeg

Description:

General view of areaFile Name: l-60-2 I 4jpeg

Description:

General view of area Itaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FliClNF ERS {* CONSI:LI..\:ft $ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet L23 of 2L2 NU RoomFloor El.MSCV East 735 735 Status:@Bldg.MSCVFile Name: 1 2-3-1 4 jpegDescription: Fire hose station located near panel 2PU-47. Judged not a seismic concern PCe llaul c. ltizz. Associates, I'c. t.\( ; ln- [ F-RS r\ C0r"tt.' i 1,{NISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.MSCV West Status:@Sheet L24 of 2L2 N/A N/A N/A 735 Bldg.MSCVInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdeeraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fluorescent fixture chain could present potential for interaction with instrument rack in the orea. Judged non-damaging. Related equipment on SWEL for this area: MCC-2-EO5 Y Y Y Y X X X X PCe lraul c. Rizao Associates, I'c.FI( ;ln*F EltS r\ C{)r-\t 1 T.{\'f S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.MSCV West 735 MSCVInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)L25 of 2L2 Evaluated bv: Status:@t0n0t20t2 Bldg.N Y N Y N Y N Y Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: t0lt0l20l2 X X X X , .]J---f^,rt'-4 /.-4 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

&" MI{iI'iUTAIYTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L26 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.MSCV West 735 Bldg.MSCV Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-2 I 3 jpeg

Description:

General view of areaFile Name: l-60-2-3-13 jpegDescription: View of cable trays in the area pce Paul c. ltiszo Associates, ['c.tNC;tNFERS N C0l{S(r:tTA\IS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.N-EAST 2 AXLB 735 73s Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)? A north-south support on the discharge piping of the pump 2CCP-1 156 is not in place (2CCP-PSSP-3208) and eliminated per DCP- I 135. Similar support is in place for 2CCP-I 157 is in place. Pipe stress calculation Jbr this piping wos reviewed and it was confirmed that the deleted support is not modeled in the stress analysis.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

No degraded conditions were identified.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Monorail identified with locked trolley. Judged not to present an interaction concern.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2CCP-274 2CCP-4 2CCP-P2IA X@Sheet 127 of 2L7 N/A N/A N/A N/A X X X PCe Paul C. Ili:zo Associates, l'c'I \GiNEI:RS r! C(]XS[ j t:t ASIS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.N-EAST 2 AXLB 735 735 AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identffied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Drums and maintenonce equipmentfound in the area to be properly secured.concernfor seismic interaction was identffied.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by:Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. Guerra N Sheet 128 of 212 U Bldg.Status:@r0lr0l2012 U N/A U N/A U N/A N Y N Y N Y No U N Date: Date: t0n0t20t2 X x X X Paul C. Rizeo Associatesp Inc.ENGTNEERS & MhISUUTA}ITSArea \ilalk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet L29 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.735 Status: @N N-EAST 2 AXLB 735 Bldg.AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-5-3-03jpeg

== Description:==

General view of areaFile Name: l-66-5-3-03jpegDescription: Trolley identified in the area to be securely restrained I 5-3-03 jpeg PCa I'".,1 c. nr* 4*r:ll*,,-g:: I \(;lNI:iltS & ( ()N\1 l -l AN I SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)N.EAST 2 AXLB 735 Sheet L3O of 2L2 Status:@U N Room Floor El.73s Bldg.AXLBFile Name: l-67 3-03 jpegDescription: General view of insulated pipe lines.File Name: I-68-5-3-03.jpeg

== Description:==

Restrained drums located in the area Paul C. Rizro Associates, Inc. E!$GINEERS & CONSULTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: I Sheet 131 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.N-EAST 2 AXLB 735 735 Bldg.AXLB File Name: l-69-5-3-03 jpeg

Description:

Restrained storage cart located in the area File Name: l-7l-5-3-03 jpeg

Description:

View of fire lines in the area pce llaul C. Ilirz' Associates, Iuc.r I(;tNEERS e rr()\it:l

L1,1..'ItArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.@Sheet t32 of 212 N/A N/A NiA N/A RSS Cubicle Bldg.SFGBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items.

Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping and conduits in the oreq were found to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2QSS-MOVl0rA 718 Y Y Y Y X X X X pce Faul c. Itizzo Associates, I'c'[\clNFuRs & f(]Nsr

llnNl sArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Evaluated by:

RSS Cubicle Sheet L33 of 2L2 SFGBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a frre in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 718 Bldg..'{7:' '- -/./ ,: /( _ ,,l.,;f.ri_1. l, 1 IBrian A. Lucarelli r0n0l20l2Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: tLtr0l20l2 Y X Y X Y X N/A Y X ltaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I:N(]INEERS & CONSI- i LTANI $Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet t34 of 2L2 U N RoomFloor El.RSS Cubicle 718 Bldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I 8 23jpeg

== Description:==

General view of area File Name: I 8 23jpeg

== Description:==

View of Recirc Spray Pump 2RSS-PZLA. I 8-3-23jpeg Paul C. Rizro Associatecr Inc. ENGINEERS & C()NSUI;TA}*TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room RSS Cubicle Status:@Sheet L35 of 2L2 UFloor El.718 Bldg.SFGB

Description:

View of Recirc Spray Pump 2RSS-PZlA. File Name: I 8-3-23jpeg

== Description:==

Recirc Spray Pump 2RSS-PZlA plate ID.File Name: l-65-8-3-23jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ET\GIN EERS & CONSLTLTA}ITs Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L36 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.RSS Cubicle 718 Bldg.SFGB File Name: l-67 3-23jpeg

== Description:== Insulated line attached to 2RSS-P2lA. Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.t \*ctNFt Rs $ cfiNst:t:r,\NTs Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)@Sheet L37 of 212 N/A RoomFloor El.741SFGB 741 Cubicle A SFGBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)? Panels in the area ore well supported.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Ducts in the area identified to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2FWE-FE]OIA Bldg.Y Y Y N/A Y X X X X PCe lranl c. [tirzo Associates, [*c't \-r;lNFtR$ {i c0Nst.:t:f.{N"lsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.SFGB 741 Cubicle A 741 Bldg.SFGBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the arca?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv: ,':7::;*#{{ Brian A. Lucarelli Status:@t0tr0/2012 Sheet L38 of 212 N/A N/A' u/'-Y--11-#eJ.(Date: Date: Eddie M. Guerra t0/10/2012 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associatesr Inc.EI\SINE ERS & C0NSUTTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SFGB 741 Cubicle A Status: @Sheet 139 of zlz U Floor El.741 Bldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I 3-3-25jpeg

== Description:== Scaffold identified in the area pce llaul C. Ilizzo Associatcs, l'c.tr l-{; lNFt RS & L:ONlit' I TA\-1..iArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomSFGB 741 Cubicle CFloor El. 741Sheet L4O of 2L2 Status: @ N U Bldg. SFGBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Wall mounted instruments in the area are identified to be in good condition.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Ducts and conduits in the area are identiJied to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2FWE-HCVLOOD YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X Ilaul C. Rizzt-r Associates, lnc.tl{;tNrf Rli & ('oNst:rtANIS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SFGB 741 Cubicle C Floor El. 741 Bldg.SFGB Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identi/ied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the arca? Na concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Scaffold in the area is well braced.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by: {tr;;-,Ht{ Brian A. Lucarelli Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: Sheetof 2t2 Status: N/A N/A r0lr0l20l2

r0/10t20t2 X x X X Paul C. Riszo Associates, Inc.ENG TNEERS Cr COITISULTANTSArea \ilalk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SFGB 741 Cubicle C Status:@Sheet L42 of 2t2 UFloor El.74r Bldg.SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-60-4-3-25jpeg

== Description:==

Scaffold identified in the area PCe [)aul c. llizzo Associates, I'c.I )i(;INFtrRli {i C-C)NS[ ;LT.{}a f SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet L43 of 2L2@SFGB SFGB Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions? Surface rust identified at two support rods on suction nozzle to 2QSS-P2lA. Judgednot to present an adverse seismic condition.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Potential interaction between a light./ixture and 3/8" diam steam line. This is judgednot to be a concern. Fluorescent light tube over 2QSS-FIS-l0lA may potentially dislodge and interact. This is judged credible but not signi/icant. Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2FWE-P22 2FWE-P23A 2SIS- ]2SIS-P2]A 718 Bldg.X X X X L44 of 2L2 Paul C. Riezo Associates, Inc.I \(;INIIERS & rr()NSt:tT.{N tsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Evaluated by: 718 SFGB Status:@r0n0/2012 SFGBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

A support rod at discharge nozzle oJ'pump 2QSS-P2lA is not in place. A tag on the post of this rod states deleted.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Bldg.N Y N Y N Y N,'?l-- //:l i' - rr-i', /ri: t,i I Brian A. Lucarelli n1 / I'&/'/H"fir Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: r0/1^0t2012 X X X X Paul C. Riazo Associates, Inc.EIlG IN EERS & CONSULTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Bldg.SFGB File Name: I 5-3-23jpeg

== Description:==

General view of fire line located in the area.File Name: I 5-3-23jpeg

== Description:==

General view of room's ceilingSheet 145 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.SFGB 718Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): I 5-3-23jpeg Paul C. Rizso Acsociater, Inc.EI{GINEERS & OS{Su TANTtArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 145 of zLz U RoomFloor El.SFGB 718 Bldg.SFGB File Name: I 5-3-23jpeg

== Description:== Hanging light bearing on top of pipe.File Name: I 5-3-23jpeg

== Description:== General view of area Paul C. Rizzo Associatesr lnc.IINGINEERS & CONSLitTA:fTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet L47 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.SFGB 718 Bldg.SFGBFile Name : l 5-3-23jpegDescription: Mirror located above 2FWE-P234File Name : l -7 0-5-3-23jpegDescription: Potential falling of light Judged not a significant Status: @N bulb could impact instrument below.interaction. t-67 3-23jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENC INEERS & L-ONSUUTI\}$TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Bldg.SFGB File Name: I 5-4-23jpeg

== Description:==

View of deleted support rod for 2QSS-P?IA discharge nozzle.Sheet L48 of 2L2 NU RoomFloor El.SFGB 718 L49 of 2L2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates. lnc.t'NCINFERS r\ L]0NSLtf'AlYrSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.SFGB 718 UP Bldg.SFGBInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays in the areafound to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2OSS-MOVl OOA 718 N Y N Y N Y N Y X X X X pce Paul c. Itizzo Associates, [*c" tlSC;tNF ERq & t-0NSl-;LTrlNl5 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SFGB 718 UP Floor El. 718 Bldg.SFGBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identffied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet LSO of 2L2 N/A N/A Evaluated bv: ,4:':: /r/,',:, t -,'r.'u/ )f *r:.{Brian A. Lucarelli t0/r0t2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: r0tr0t20t2 X X X X pOe I'aul c. llizzo Associates, I.c.[\(]t NE:ERS t\ (_-ONSt rt'L{\1.\Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SFGB 718 UPFloor El.718 Bldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Sheet LSt of 2L2 pce Paul c. Itizzo Associates, I*c.t N$ lN Ff_ R 5 & ULINSI.:LT.{NISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SFGB 718 West Floor El.@Sheet L52 of 2L2 N/A SFGB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping and conduits in the qrea wereJbund to be rigidly supported. 718 Bldg.N/A N/A N/A 4. Does it appear that the area is free interactions with other equipment lighting)? of potentially adverse seismic spatial in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2SIS-MOV\63A 2SIS-MOV881]A 2SWS-MOVIO4A X X X X PCe Paul c. Rizz' Associates, l'c.I NClNEF_R5 & e()NSt:t.T.{\'t sArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC) RoomFloor El.Sheet t53 of 2L2 SFGB 718 West Status:@10tr0t20r2 SFGB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?ScalJbld in the area is well braced.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv: 7r8 Bldg.N Y N Y N Y N YEddie M. Guerra Date: Date: t0n0t20t2 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.INC INE,tsRs {\ CONST;LT.{NI.S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L54 of 2L2 U N RoomFloor El.SFGB 718 West 718 Bldg.SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I 7 23jpeg

Description:

View of supports for piping in the area File Name: l 7 23jpeg

== Description:== General view of area PCe Paul C. Rizz' Associates, I*c.It((ilNF [.R5 r\ L-ONSI

tTAN.rSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Room Floor El.SFGB 737 737 Bldg.SFGBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:MCC-2-E I 1Sheet L55 of 212 Status: Y x N Y N Y N Y N X X X pce llaul c. Ilizz' Associates, l*c.Area Roomt N(;INI]F_R5 & L:ONSIIl:I'Alir$ Walk-By Checklist (AWC) SFGB 737 Floor El.737 Bldg.SFGBInteraction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Noflooding concern identdied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?A 55 gallon drum and one light weight shelve near MCC-2-E11 were identified to beunrestrained. Plant personnel were notified and the drum and shelving were immediately tied off. cR-2012-14420 issued to address this condition.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

X Y Sheet L56 of 2L2 NiA N/A X X X Evaluated by: ,-=;1.4/tt(Brian A. Lucarelli t0n0t20t2 1tt lYJ-d'*-A /.4 Eddie M. Guerra Date: t0lt0l20r2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUUTA}ITSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Sheet L57 of 2L2 @u Room Floor El.SFGB 737 737 Bldg.SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-2-3-24.1pegDescription: Maintenance equipment and unrestrained drums located in the areanear MCC. CR-2012-14420 issued to address the situation. File Name: l-60-2-3-24.1peg

== Description:== View of hanging lights in the area. l 2-3-24.jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG INEERS & CC}NSU LTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y@Bldg.SFGB File Name: l 2-3-24.1peg

== Description:== Notice label on top of unrestrained drum near MCC.Sheet L58 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.SFGB 737 737 pOe I'au[ c. Iliazo Associates, I*c.f Nt;lNEERS {l L-ONSIllTrl}'.'lS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet 759 of 2L2 Status:@SFGB 741-PLAT Bldg.SFGBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2HVR-ACU207A 741 Y Y Y N/A X X X X Faul C. Ilizzo Associatcs, lnc.f ST;II.iEERS N CONIUITANI'SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet L6O of 2L2 U Status:@r0lr0l20r2 N RoomFloor El.741 SFGB 741-PLAT SFGB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Scaffold in the area is well braced. Temporary unrestrained step ladder.found in the area judged not a seismic concern.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by:Brian A. Lucarelli Date: Eddie M. Guerra Date: Bldg.N Y U N/A U NiA N Y U N Y N/A U N Y r0n0t20t2 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)SFGB 741-PLAT Status: @Sheet LGL of 2L2 U 741 Bldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-2-3-25jpeg

== Description:== Scaffold located in the area File Name:

Description:

Unrestrained ladder identified in the area. Judged not a seismic cqncern for nearby equipment. l-60-2-3-zsjpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.t\(;INFI'RS & CONStrlT.dNl SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SRVB 780Floor El.780 Bldg.SRVB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Blockwall identified in the area. Calculation 57.7 shows blockwall has been reinforced to adequately sustain seismic effects. Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2FWS-FCV47B 2FWS-FCV479 @Sheet L62 of 2L2 N/A N/A X X X X pCe Paul C. ltizz' Associatcs, ['c.I \clN[trRS {i Ct)NsUtTrNfS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.SRVB 780 780 SRVBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffolding located in the area was judged not to presenl an inleraction concern with nearby equipment.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N Sheet L63 of 2I2 U Bldg.Status:@t0tr0t20r2 U N/A U N/A U N/A N Y N Y N Y U N Y Evaluated by:-.1< - I ,t ,. 7,/'tl=--' -,L-./

t. '.,-l't,,/t.,*-{

t";tBrian A. Lucarelli/.-/"<---t'/t+-qJf Date: Date: Eddie M. Guerra r0n0t20t2 X X X X R Paul c. Rizzo Associates, I*c.IINCINEERS Ar C()NSL,'LTANI $Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Status:@Sheet L54 of 2L2 U N SRVB 780 780 Bldg.SRVBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-2-3-27 .1peg

== Description:== General view of areaFile Name: l-60-2-3-27 jpeg

Description:

General view of area Sheet L55 of 2L2 ltaul C]. ltizzo Associatcs, lnc.[ \( ;lNF I:RS & (]t)ltsl ;l TA,\*l s Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @N Bldg.SRVB File Name: l-65-2-3-27 jpeg

Description:

Scaffold identified in the atea File Name : l 2-3-27jpeg

== Description:== Tag for seismic requirements for nearby scaffold U RoomFloor El.SRVB 780 780 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EI\G INEERS &" OONSUUTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet t66 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.SRVB 780 780 Bldg.SRVBFile Name: l-67 3-27 .1peg

Description:

General view of area File Name: l-68-2-3-27 .1peg

== Description:== Block wall identified in the area PCe Paul c. Rizz' Associated, l'c.I i{{IINFERS & (-ONSI :lf _{}*Ti Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SWGR Vent Room 773 Floor El. 773 Blde. MSCV Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Sheet t67 of 2L2 Status: @ N U1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Fans and ducts in the area were.found to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 7HVZ-DMP215A 2HVZ-FN261A 2HVZ-FN261B YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.L:tClNEERs {! CONSTrlTAt*TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SWGR Vent Room 773Floor El. 773 Bldg. MSCV Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No Jlooding concern identified in this areo.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Temporary housekeeping equipment identified in the area. Judged not to present an interaction concern with nearby components.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the arca?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet 168 of 2L2 Status: @ N U YNUN/A X YNUNiA X YNUN/A X YNU XDate: l0ll0l20l2 Date: l0n0t20L2 Eddie M. Guerra Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN'GTNEERS 6c C0NSUUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L69 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.773SWGR Vent Room 773 Bldg.MSCVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: 1-59-9 l6 jpeg

Description:

General view of areaFile Name: l-60-9-3-16jpegDescription: Equipment found in the area. Itaul C. Rizz,o Associatesr Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSTi LT.{N-TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L7O of 2L2 U N RoomFloor El.SWGR Vent Room 773 773 Bldg.MSCV File Name : l-66-9 I 6jpeg

== Description:==

General view of area PC\e Paul c. Rizz' Associates, I.c.h ]..C lN EE RS

CoNiUtT,{\1-SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Sheet !7L of 212 Status: YValve Pit A 7t8 Bldg.VLVPInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in thedegraded conditions?area appear to be free of significant Tag No. 63005 on valve 2SWS-MOV562 indicates that the valve has rust and needs tobe cleaned and painted. CR-2012-14412 issued to address this condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

All piping in the area is well supported. Unit heater identi/ied to be well supported.Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2SWS-MOVl06A2SWS-PT-] ] 3A N Y N Y N Y N X X X X Paul C. ltizzo Associates, Inc. 1,r*{;lNFtRS & (-()Nit',lTA.}iTsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Valve Pit A Bldg.VLVP Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the areaT Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Sheet L72 of 2L2 U Status: Y t0/1^0t20r2 @718 U N Y U N Y N/A N Y N/A U N/A U N YEvaluated by: ,'?=i,/,{+(Brian A. Lucarelli Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: t0tr0t20t2 X X X X R Paul c. Rizro Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & COTTISUUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Valve Pit A Status:@Sheet L73 of 2L2 UFloor El.7 r8 Bldg.VLVPOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: VLV_PT_A( I Xpg

Description:

General view of area File Name: VLV_PT_A(2)jpg

== Description:==

General view of area Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG INEERS &. C-ONSULTANIS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y@Sheet L74 of 2t2 U RoomFloor El.Valve Pit A 718 Bldg.VLVP File Name: VLV_PT_A(3)jpg

== Description:== Surface rust identified on several MOVs in the area.File Name: VLV_PT_A(4)jpg

== Description:==

Deficiency tag requesting cleanup and painting.CR-2012-14412 issued to address this finding. PC\e []aul C. Rizzo Associates, I'c.f \(;l N FERS & L'ONSI. I l_1.{i-TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.Yard Bldg.YARD Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?Mild surface corrosion identified on several locations oround tank 2QSS-TK21. Thisis mostly due to humidity in the area. CR-2012-14744 and CR-2012-14749 wereissued to address moderate corrosion identified on valves.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)? Piping and conduits in the areq were found to be rigidly supported. N Y Status: YSheet L75 of 2tZ N/A N/A N Y N N Y 4. Does it appear that the area is free interactions with other equipment lighting)? of potentially adverse seismic spatialin the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2QSS-2e7 2oSS-LT104A

2QSS-TK2I 730 X X X X pce Paul c. [tizz. Associates, Inc.l: )ir;tN I S RS & CClNit i i T,{r*IS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Yard 730 YARD Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?Noflooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffolding identified to be well braced.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the arca?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Bldg.@Sheet L76 of 2L2 U N Y N N Y Stafus: Y r0/10t2012 U N/A U N/A U N/A U N Y Evaluated by: ff:;#,,{,!1 Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. Guerra Date: Date: r0n0t20t2 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associateu, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSLILTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L77 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.Yard 730 Bldg.YARDOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-65-4-3-29.1pe9

== Description:==

View of Tank 2QSS-TK2I. File Name: I 4 29.;peg

== Description:==

Scaffold located in the area. Itaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.F NGTNF E RS S. C'ONSL: tTAr*fS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y Sheet L78 of 2L2 U@RoomFloor El.Yard 730 Bldg.YARDFile Name: l-66-4-3-29.1peg

== Description:== General view of area File Name : l-67 3-29.jpeg

== Description:== Scaffold located in the area. I-67 3-29.jpeg Paul C. Riz,zo Associates, Inc.EhIGTNEERS & CONSUUTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Sheet L79 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.Yard 730 Bldg.YARD File Name: I 4-3-29.1peg

== Description:==

General view of area pCe Ilaul c. Rizzo Associates, h'rc.RCBX 721-A RCP Pump Cubicle 72rE\:Cl NFDRS (\ eONSl : I ]'As.-"l'S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Room Floor El.Bldg.RCBX Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?No degraded conditions were identified.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Piping and cable trays in the area were.fbund to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2CCP-AOVI OTA NSheet L8O of 2L2 U U N N/A N/A N/A U N Y U N Y NiA U N Y X X X X PCe lraul c. Riszo Associates, I'c.I \."{ ;l Nf E RS {i {'0NSt : ]:I'.{i-'IS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet t8L of 2L2 U Status:@t0lt0l20l2 N RCBX 721-A RCP Pump Cubicle 721 Bldg.RCBX Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?NoJlooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Scaffolding located in the area. Judged not to present an interaction concern.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: N U N Y N Y U NiA N/A U N/A U N Y Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: rutr0t20r2 X X X X Paul C. Riszo Associateo, Inc, ENCINEERS E. CONSULTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet L82 of 2Lz U RoomFloor El.721 RCBX 721-4 RCP Pump Cubicle Bldg.RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-6-3-l9jpeg

== Description:==

View of scaffold in the area File Name: l-60-6-3-l9jpeg

== Description:==

View of pipe supports and cables hanging in the area Paul C. Rizzo Associatesr Inc, ENGINEER5 & CONSUUTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet t83 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.721 RCBX 721-A RCP Pump Cubicle Bldg.RCBX File Name: l-65-6-3-19jpeg

== Description:==

View of scaffold in the area I -6s-6 l9 jpeg PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, I'c.I li(; lNIl h RS (. !:ONSL: tll A*-"t SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.RCBX 718 Bldg.RCBX Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays in the area werefound to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2CCP-FTIOTA 2CCP-PT]O7ASheet L84 of 2L2 U 718 N N/A U N/A U N/A U N/A U N Y N N N Y X X X X Itaul C'. Rizzo Associates, Inc.h :r-"c I n! F I R 5 & (.ONS[ i t:l'A]iIS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room RCBX 718 Floor El. 718 Bldg.RCBX Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Maintenance equipmentfound in the area to be properly restrained.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Eddie M. Guerra NSheet L85 of 2L2 U U N Y N N Y Status:@r0lr0l2012 N/A U N/A U N/A U N Y Date: Date: r0lr0l2012 X X X X Paul C. Riszo Associatesr Inc.ri.ruG INEERS &. CONSLiI.TANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet L86 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.RCBX 718 718 Bldg.RCBX other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-2 l gjpeg

Description:

General view of area File Name: l-60-2 I gjpeg

Description:

View of maintenance equipment in the area Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS &. CONSUUTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Bldg.RCBX File Name: l-65-2 19 jpeg

Description:

View of cable trays in the area. File Name: l-66-2 I 9jpeg

Description:

View of vertical cable trays properly supportedSheet L87 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.RCBX 718 718 PCe llaul c. Itizzo Associates, I'c.Sheet L88 of 2L2 Status: @ N UIlli(ilN F:E RS &. CO NSLiI

1".*{f S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room RCBX 7l8-AnnulusFloor El.

718 Bldg. RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?lV'all mounted supports and instruments were.found in good condition.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2CCP-MOV] 12A 2FWS-LT477F YNUNiA X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X pce llaul c. Rizz' Ass'ciates, I'c.t\1; lNIt I RS & CONSl_; LTA]il:Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) RoomFloor El.Evaluated by: RCBX 718-AnnulusL89 of 2L2 718 Bldg.RCBX Status:@t0lr0l2012 Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No Jlooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Maintenance carts in the area identified to be securelv locked.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) N Y N Y N Y N Y"-#;;_{{!:{ Brian A. Lucarelli Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: t0n0t20r2 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSI.ILTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @RCBX 7l8-Annulus 718 Bldg.RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Description:

Temporary outage related maintenance equipment File Name: l-60-4-3-19jpeg

== Description:==

Temporary outage related maintenance equipmentSheet 190 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.File Name: l-59-4-3-l 9jpeg pce Paul C. Rizzo A.ssociates, I*c.FNtl ls-[t RS &. CONSUl:I AN-I SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RCBX 692-Near Inner Stairs Status:@RoomFloor El.692 Bldg.RCBXInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limitsf4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2CHS-MOV3I O N N Y N Y N YSheet L9t of 2L2 X x X X I-)aul C. Ilizzo Associates, lnc.f.Nctn\[ERS & l{)Nst-:L:l A\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Floor El.RCBX 692-Near Inner Stairs 692 Bldg.RCBX Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Heavy storqge boxes and scaffolding were identi/ied in the area. Judged not an interaction concern.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Status:@l0lr0l2012Sheet L92 U U N/A N/A N U N Y N Y U N Y U N Y Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: r0n0/2012 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I-NGINEERS {i. CONSL]L.TA}.II S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L93 of 2L2 U N RoomFloor El.692 RCBX 692-Near Inner Stairs Bldg.RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I 4-3-17 .jpeg

Description:

View of heavy storage boxes in the area. File Name: I 4-3-17 .jpeg

Description:

Fire line located above 2CHS-MOV310 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ET.$GINEERS & CONSUUTANT$ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:Sheet 194 of zLz U RoomFloor El.RCBX 692-Near Inner Stairs 692 Bldg.RCBX File Name: l-65-4-3-17 jpeg

Description:

View of scaffold in the area PCE Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room RCBX 718-PEN-724 COL 9Sheet L95 of 2L2 Status: @ N U Floor El. 718 Bldg. RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?wall mounted supports and instruments were.found in good condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays in the area were.found to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2DAS-AOVl OOA YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUNiA X pce Paul C. Ilize. Associates, I'c.f NCINESRS & lONSI:11"tu\.15 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.RCBX 718-PEN-724 COL 9 Bldg.RCBX Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Scaffold in the area is well braced.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: Brian A. Lucarelli-m41d, Eddie M. Guerra 718 NSheet L96 of 2L2 U U N Y N Y Status:@t0ll0l20r2 N/A U N/A U N/A N Y U N Y Date: Date: r0tr0t20r2 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EI\'G INE ERS & CONST.ILTA}ITSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room RCBX 718-PEN-724 COL 9 Floor El.718 Status:@Sheet t97 of zlz U Bldg.RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-66-7 l9jpeg

Description:

General view of area File Name: l 7 I gjpeg

Description:

View of scaffold in the area pOe I'.g!-c. Ilizzo Asstrciates, I'c.[N.-(; tN E F.RS & r-ONSt i litAN'fS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.RCBX 707 707 Bldg.RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions? Mild surface corrosion identiJied on anchorage.for heat exchangers (2RHS-E2lA and 2RHS-E2IB) and pump (2RHS-P2IA) in the area. Judged not to present an adverse condition.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Rod hung supports found in adequate condition. Cabte trays in the area were Jbund to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2RHS-E2IA 2RHS-HCV758A 2RHS-P2]A 2RHS-RV721A Sheet L98 of 212 Status:@X N Y N Y N Y N Y x X X PCe Paul C. Rizzo Ass*ciates, ['c.ENCINFLRS {! C{)NST:ITAN] S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.RCBX 707 707 RCBX Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No./looding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Bldg.Sheet I99 of 2L2 U Status:@t0n0/20t2 N U N Y U N N/A NiA N Y U N/A U N Y Evaluated by:.f;. '- ,/ -/.. /l - - .1.:,1,u,ri*,1,_-jr,(I Brian A. Lucarelli Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: t0tr0t20t2 X X x X Paul C. Riezo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & L-ONSULTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Status:@Sheet 20O of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.RCBX 707 707 Bldg.RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-59-2-2-lSjpeg

== Description:== General view of area File Name: l 2-2-lSjpeg

== Description:==

View of sheet metal housing on 2RHS-E2lB and sulrounding piping. Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @N Sheet 2OL of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.RCBX 707 707 Bldg.RCBX File Name: l-65-2 I 8 jpeg

Description:

View of well braced HVAC ducts in the area File Name: 2-63-3-2-lSjpeg

== Description:== General view of Heat Exchanger 2RHS-E?IB Paul C. RiEro Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CON$UITA}i'TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 202 of 2L2 U N RoomFloor El.RCBX 707 707 Bldg.RCBX File Name: 2-64-3-2-lSjpeg

== Description:==

General view of ceiling rod hung supports PCe Paul C. Rizzo Ass'ciates, ['c.t,f,*t;lNFERs & C{lNSL;l i AN-I'S Checklist (AWC)RCBX 718-A RCP Pump Area Walk-By RoomFloor El.718 Status: Bldg.RCBXInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. 'space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays in the area were Jbund to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2RHS-MOV7O2A N Y N Y N Y N Y2O3 of 2L2 X X X X pCe Iraul C. Itizzo Associatcs, ['c.RCBX 718-4 RCP Pump riNctNf tRs ti c()NsLtlANIs Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.718 Bldg.RCBXInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No Jlooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identffied regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?ScalJblding located in the area. Judged not to present an interqction concern.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Eddie M. Guerra Status:@t0n0t20t2 N Y N Y N Y N Y Date: Date: t0n0t20t2 2O4 of 2L2 X X X X R Paul c. Rizzo Associates, I*c.FNG INEERS &. T]ONSTi I.:I A}VITArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RCBX 718-,4' RCP Pump Status:@Sheet 205 of 2t2 U N RoomFloor El.718 Bldg.RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I 3 l9 jpeg

Description:

General view of area File Name: I 3-3-l9jpeg

== Description:==

View of scaffolding in the area I 3-3-r9jpeg PCa [)aul c. Itizzo Associates, I.c.[ \{-ih- F F. R 5 r\ {-(,rNSU Ll ,\}i.lsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room RCBX 718-Annulus Col 4Floor El. 718 Bldg. RCBXInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Sheet ZOG ot 2L2 Status: @ N UI . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions? Wall mounted supports for piping and cable trays were identified to be in good condition.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2SIS-67 YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUNiA X PCe Paul c. Ilizzo Ass.ciates, 1*c.I:SGINFERS & (-ONST:LI A}iTS Area Watk-By Checklist (AWC)RCBX 718-Annulus Col4 NSheet 2O7 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.Interaction Effects 718 RCBX 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingJire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporury installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Nitrogen bottles and storage boxes were identified to be properly secured in the area.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the arca?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

{=;"4{t{Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: Bldg.Status:@r0tr0t20t2 U N/A U N/A U N/A N Y N Y N Y U N Y Eddie M. Guerra Date: t0tt0t20r2 X X X X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & (UNSUUTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @NSheet 208 of 212 U Room Floor El.718 RCBX 718-Annulus Col 4 Bldg.RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: I 5 l9 jpeg

Description:

General view of cable trays and fire line in the area File Name:

Description:

View of nitrogen bottles and storage boxes properly secured in the area I 5 l9 jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG INEERS & CONSUUTAI*TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet 209 of 2L2 U RoomFloor El.718 RCBX 718-Annulus Col 4 Bldg.RCBX File Name: l-65-5-3-l9jpeg

== Description:==

Temporary outage related maintenance equipmentFile Name: l-66-5-3-l9jpegDescription: View of wall mounted supports for piping and cable trays. Paul C. ltizzo Associates, Inc.h-{lt NF tRs & coNst.:t:rA:-rsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room RCBX 718-8 RCP PumpSheet ?LO of 2I2 Status: @ N U Floor El. 718 Bldg. RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?Wall mounted supports for piping were identdied to be in good condition.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)? Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2RHS-MOV72OA YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X YNUN/A X Ilaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.[r-C lN Fl E R S & r] O NSLi tl'Ar-I S Area Watk-By Checklist (AWC)NSheet ZtL of 2L2 U Room Floor El.Interaction Effects RCBX 718-8 RCP Pump RCBX5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)? Scaffold in the area is well braced.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra 718 Bldg.Status:@t0/r0/2012 U NiA N/A U N/A N Y U N Y N Y U N Date: Date: r0/10t2012 X X X X Ilaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,[:NGINEIRS & CONSL]UI"AIVI S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @N Sheet 2L2 of 2L2 U Room Floor El.718 RCBX 718-8 RCP Pump Bldg.RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-5-2-19 jpeg

Description:

General view of 2RHS-MOV720A File Name: 2-62-5-2-19.1peg

== Description:==

View of scaffolding above 2RHS-MOV720A 2-6r-5-2-19 jpeg 2-62-5-2-t9.jpeg APPENDIX D: COMPONENT LIST FOR ANCHORAGE CONFIGURATION CHECK Component ID References 2CCP-E2IA Drawing 10080-RS-36J 2CCP-FTIO7 A Drawins 12241 -BK- 16G-8-2F 2CCP-P2IA Drawins 12241 -RC-36P-9 2CCP-PT1O7A Drawing 12241-BK- 1 6G-8-2F}CCP-TK21A Calculation NM(B)-436-IA 2CHS-PzIA Drawing 10080-RC-36N and Drawine 10080-RC-36P 2CHS-TK21A Drawing 2003.470-033-0 I I 2EGF-TK22A Drawins 10080-RC-29 A and Drawine 10080-RC-29B 2EGS-EGz-I Drawins 10080-RC-298 2FNC-EZTA Drawins I 0080-RC-0038K 2FNC-PZTA Drawing 1 0080-RC-0038K 2FWE-P22 Calculation I 2241-NM(B ) -67 8 -CZC 2FWE-P23A Drawins 2002.400 -208 -028 and C alculat ron 2602. 400- 20 8 -03 5 C 2HVD-FN2]OA Calculation NM(B)-SZ l -CZC 2HVZ-FN26IA Calculation NM(B)-52 1 -CZC 2HVZ-FN261B Calculation NM (B) - 521 -CZC 2QSS-LT l04A Drawing 12241-BK-l6G-45-3 2RHS-E218 Drawing 1 0080-ISI-E-2P 2RHS-PzIA Drawins 10880-RV-0052A 2SIS-P21A Drawins 2002.290-00 I -002 2SWS-PzIA Calculation 73 I -N-0027 2SWS-PT-1134 Drawing 12241 -BK- 1 6G- I7 -3K 2SWS-PT-TT7 A Drawins 12241-RK-5J-2 BAT-2-1 Drawins 2001 .240-841 -034 DC-SWBD2-I Drawins 200 1.260-3 50-030F MCC-2-EO1C alculation NM (B) - 468 -CZC MCC-2-E07C alcul at ron 12241 -NM (B ) - 468 -CZC MCC-2-El1 Calculation I 224 I-NM(B ) -468-CZC PNL 2DIGEN-l Calculation I 2241-NM(B ) -438-CZC PNL DC2-07 Drawin g 200 l .260 -363 -082L PNL DC2-19 Drawins 2001 .260-363- l56,{ D-l Component ID References PNL.SEQ-244 Drawing 10080-R TRF-2-8N Drawing 2001. 180-307- 131C UPS-VITBS2-I Drawing SK-E02-0376-E- I -5 UPS-VITB52.1-REG Drawins SK-E02-0376-E- I -5 D-2}}

v t e Letter Sequence Other
TAC:MF0092, (Open) TAC:MF0093, (Open) TAC:MF0116, (Open) TAC:MF0159, (Open)
Initiation Acceptance... Administration Questions Answers 10 July 2012 29 April 2013 24 September 2013 27 November 2012 Results Approval... Other: L-13-376, Addendum to the Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1, Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report, ML13135A229, ML13135A230, ML13135A231, ML13135A233, ML13135A234, ML13135A235, ML13135A236, ML13135A237, ML13135A238, ML13135A240, ML13135A241, ML13135A242, ML13135A243, ML13135A244, ML13135A245, ML13135A246, ML13135A247, ML13135A248, ML13135A249, ML13135A251, ML13151A052, ML13295A695, ML14009A089
MONTHYEAR2013-11-21 [Table View]

ML13135A241: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 22:23, 17 March 2019

Text

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Navigation menu

Search